中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 1082-1094.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.06.003
王秀秀1,2(),邢爱双2,杨茹2,何守朴2,贾银华2,潘兆娥2,王立如2,杜雄明2(),宋宪亮1()
收稿日期:
2021-10-26
接受日期:
2021-11-19
出版日期:
2022-03-16
发布日期:
2022-03-25
通讯作者:
杜雄明,宋宪亮
作者简介:
王秀秀,Tel:18854889975;E-mail: 基金资助:
WANG XiuXiu1,2(),XING AiShuang2,YANG Ru2,HE ShouPu2,JIA YinHua2,PAN ZhaoE2,WANG LiRu2,DU XiongMing2(),SONG XianLiang1()
Received:
2021-10-26
Accepted:
2021-11-19
Online:
2022-03-16
Published:
2022-03-25
Contact:
XiongMing DU,XianLiang SONG
摘要:
【目的】鉴定分析陆地棉种质的纤维品质、产量和早熟等性状,筛选综合评价指标,建立可靠的综合评价模型,为陆地棉品种选育提供理论支撑。【方法】以来源广泛的630份陆地棉种质为材料,在中国3个主要植棉区的8个环境下,对17个表型性状进行鉴定,使用R包“lme4”对表型性状数据进行最佳线性无偏估计(best linear unbiased prediction,BLUP),并用于后续分析。综合运用相关分析、主成分分析、隶属函数法、聚类分析和逐步回归等方法对陆地棉种质进行综合评价。【结果】陆地棉种质群体具有较高的遗传多样性,不同性状的多样性指数为1.961—2.084,并且存在明显的区域特异性。该群体的铃数、伸长率、纺纱均匀性指数和短绒率具有较大变异,纤维长度、纤维强度和生育期性状的变异较小。相关分析表明,多数性状间存在显著或极显著相关性,部分纤维品质性状之间存在极强相关性。通过主成分分析,将17个性状转换为6个独立的综合指标,其贡献率为5.860%—31.044%,累积贡献率达到82.642%。主成分分析可以很好地将该陆地棉群体的纤维品质性状、产量性状和农艺性状进行分类。利用隶属函数法计算表型综合值(F值),17个性状的表型值与F值均显著相关。发现F值高的材料(均值为0.668)的产量性状(铃数、单铃重、衣分和子指)和纤维品质性状(纤维长度、纤维整齐度、纤维强度、纺纱均匀性指数、短绒率和马克隆值)显著优于F值低的材料(均值为0.396),并且具有植株较高和生育期较长的特点。通过逐步回归建立了8个性状(铃数、吐絮期、单铃重、开花期、衣分、株高、果枝始节和纺纱均匀性指数)作为自变量的回归方程。基于F值进行系统聚类,将630份陆地棉种质划分为4类,第Ⅰ类为纤维品质优质型,包含118份材料;第Ⅱ类丰产型包含250份材料;第Ⅲ类为早熟型,包含51份材料;第Ⅳ类材料的表型介于第Ⅱ类和第Ⅲ类之间。最终筛选出23份纤维品质优良材料和135份高产材料,可提供育种和生产应用。【结论】陆地棉表型性状存在地理来源特异性;采用多元统计分析方法综合评价陆地棉种质是可行的;630份陆地棉种质可被分划为4种类型(优质型、丰产型、早熟型和其他型)。
王秀秀,邢爱双,杨茹,何守朴,贾银华,潘兆娥,王立如,杜雄明,宋宪亮. 陆地棉种质资源表型性状综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
表1
陆地棉种质17个性状的描述性指标"
性状 Traits | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 方差 Variance | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 变异系数 Coefficient of variation (%) | 上四分之一位数 Q1 | 下四分之一位数 Q3 | 多样性 指数 H' |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
吐絮期BOD | 124.903 | 143.797 | 133.870 | 2.720 | 7.396 | 0.026 | 1.315 | 2.031 | 132.462 | 135.382 | 2.019 |
开花期FD | 66.619 | 76.051 | 72.190 | 1.386 | 1.922 | -0.500 | 0.528 | 1.920 | 71.271 | 73.117 | 2.053 |
株高PH | 56.812 | 87.718 | 72.638 | 4.348 | 18.909 | -0.048 | 0.555 | 5.986 | 69.935 | 75.487 | 2.070 |
果枝节位SBN | 5.904 | 7.770 | 6.456 | 0.174 | 0.030 | 0.431 | 4.774 | 2.699 | 6.354 | 6.572 | 2.044 |
铃数BN | 9.142 | 18.224 | 12.678 | 1.287 | 1.658 | 0.221 | 0.567 | 10.156 | 11.795 | 13.482 | 2.068 |
单铃重BW | 3.889 | 6.623 | 5.372 | 0.434 | 0.188 | -0.140 | 0.259 | 8.076 | 5.101 | 5.658 | 2.068 |
果枝数FBN | 10.442 | 11.919 | 11.207 | 0.216 | 0.047 | -0.098 | 0.557 | 1.926 | 11.071 | 11.337 | 2.049 |
衣分LP | 19.397 | 42.836 | 34.727 | 2.917 | 8.508 | -0.244 | 1.149 | 8.400 | 32.876 | 36.614 | 2.056 |
子指SI | 9.209 | 15.392 | 11.883 | 1.089 | 1.186 | 0.265 | -0.056 | 9.164 | 11.078 | 12.567 | 2.077 |
伸长率FE | 6.972 | 13.468 | 9.456 | 1.034 | 1.070 | 0.094 | 0.161 | 10.936 | 8.809 | 10.130 | 2.077 |
纤维长度FL | 23.212 | 34.985 | 29.607 | 1.875 | 3.516 | 0.414 | 0.362 | 6.334 | 28.409 | 30.524 | 2.037 |
纤维整齐度FLU | 79.915 | 87.204 | 84.649 | 0.958 | 0.918 | -0.536 | 1.803 | 1.132 | 84.138 | 85.240 | 2.030 |
纤维强度FS | 24.410 | 37.517 | 29.462 | 1.986 | 3.945 | 0.919 | 0.772 | 6.742 | 28.128 | 30.345 | 1.962 |
成熟度MAT | 0.821 | 0.868 | 0.847 | 0.008 | 0.000 | -0.186 | -0.019 | 0.965 | 0.841 | 0.852 | 2.084 |
马克隆值MIC | 3.587 | 5.676 | 4.580 | 0.336 | 0.113 | -0.309 | 0.192 | 7.337 | 4.377 | 4.806 | 2.012 |
纺纱均匀性指数SCI | 80.190 | 179.508 | 136.565 | 14.856 | 220.706 | 0.477 | 0.593 | 10.878 | 127.338 | 143.745 | 2.016 |
短绒率SFI | 3.244 | 10.985 | 5.144 | 0.751 | 0.564 | 0.698 | 7.195 | 14.603 | 4.788 | 5.559 | 1.961 |
表2
不同地理来源的种质表型性状差异"
性状 Traits | 非洲 Africa | 亚洲其他国家 Other Asian countries | 欧洲 Europe | 南美洲 South America | 美国与墨西哥 America and Mexico | 前苏联 Former Soviet Union | 澳大利亚 Australia | 长江流域 Yangtze River valley | 黄河流域 Yellow River valley | 中国北部 North China | F值 F value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
铃数BN | 12.481 | 12.748 | 12.385 | 12.547 | 12.765 | 12.232 | 12.715 | 12.952 | 12.973 | 12.189 | 2.739** |
吐絮期BOD | 135.057 | 133.945 | 131.852 | 135.532 | 134.625 | 132.153 | 135.892 | 134.270 | 133.643 | 131.067 | 16.555** |
单铃重BW | 5.433 | 5.461 | 5.288 | 5.544 | 5.483 | 5.375 | 5.381 | 5.258 | 5.316 | 5.176 | 4.319** |
果枝数FBN | 11.168 | 11.150 | 11.251 | 11.056 | 11.169 | 11.313 | 10.982 | 11.289 | 11.218 | 11.214 | 9.959** |
开花期FD | 72.913 | 72.448 | 71.328 | 72.476 | 72.609 | 71.294 | 73.132 | 72.065 | 72.426 | 71.024 | 12.766** |
伸长率FE | 9.875 | 9.913 | 9.885 | 9.931 | 9.560 | 9.968 | 9.587 | 8.516 | 9.809 | 9.056 | 21.971** |
纤维长度FL | 29.682 | 29.065 | 28.604 | 29.293 | 28.880 | 28.058 | 30.144 | 31.814 | 29.134 | 30.530 | 47.759** |
纤维整齐度FLU | 84.842 | 84.362 | 84.162 | 84.535 | 84.381 | 83.993 | 84.828 | 85.487 | 84.593 | 85.174 | 22.611** |
纤维强度FS | 29.282 | 28.932 | 28.260 | 29.027 | 28.941 | 28.171 | 29.586 | 31.695 | 28.736 | 30.409 | 37.642** |
衣分LP | 34.606 | 34.400 | 34.923 | 35.008 | 34.041 | 34.568 | 35.348 | 34.760 | 35.785 | 35.262 | 2.522** |
成熟度MAT | 0.844 | 0.845 | 0.847 | 0.845 | 0.847 | 0.847 | 0.845 | 0.847 | 0.846 | 0.849 | 1.408 |
马克隆值MIC | 4.583 | 4.634 | 4.754 | 4.666 | 4.654 | 4.792 | 4.539 | 4.256 | 4.662 | 4.544 | 23.278** |
株高PH | 75.503 | 73.274 | 70.924 | 71.410 | 71.764 | 73.994 | 72.160 | 72.182 | 72.707 | 75.281 | 5.403** |
果枝节位SBN | 6.532 | 6.491 | 6.355 | 6.493 | 6.464 | 6.377 | 6.563 | 6.459 | 6.484 | 6.405 | 4.724** |
纺纱均匀性指数SCI | 137.087 | 132.173 | 127.293 | 133.401 | 131.791 | 124.857 | 139.234 | 154.121 | 132.454 | 143.795 | 46.108** |
短绒率SFI | 5.065 | 5.390 | 5.574 | 5.269 | 5.395 | 5.420 | 5.148 | 4.443 | 5.331 | 4.663 | 24.228** |
子指SI | 11.677 | 11.583 | 11.526 | 12.004 | 12.136 | 11.832 | 11.515 | 12.349 | 11.574 | 11.194 | 7.084** |
表3
陆地棉种质17个性状的相关性分析"
性状 Traits | 铃数 BN | 吐絮期 BOD | 单铃重 BW | 果枝数 FBN | 开花期 FD | 伸长率 FE | 纤维 长度 FL | 纤维整 齐度 FLU | 纤维 强度 FS | 衣分 LP | 成熟度 MAT | 马克 隆值 MIC | 株高 PH | 果枝 节位 SBN | 纺纱均 匀性指 数SCI | 短绒率 SFI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
吐絮期 BOD | -0.110** | |||||||||||||||
单铃重 BW | -0.067 | 0.140** | ||||||||||||||
果枝数 FBN | 0.373** | -0.389** | -0.306** | |||||||||||||
开花期 FD | 0.145** | 0.727** | 0.125** | -0.305** | ||||||||||||
伸长率 FE | 0.042 | 0.059 | 0.105** | -0.129** | 0.261** | |||||||||||
纤维长度 FL | 0.053 | 0.160** | -0.115** | 0.014 | -0.009 | -0.503** | ||||||||||
纤维整 齐度 FLU | 0.089* | 0.162** | -0.026 | -0.006 | 0.048 | -0.338** | ||||||||||
纤维强度 FS | -0.021 | 0.057 | -0.131** | 0.094* | -0.165** | -0.624** | 0.806** | 0.753** | ||||||||
衣分LP | 0.331** | -0.108** | 0.092* | 0.052 | 0.052 | 0.127** | -0.028 | 0.151** | -0.051 | |||||||
成熟度 MAT | 0.061 | -0.227** | -0.009 | 0.223** | -0.293** | -0.580** | -0.133** | -0.110** | 0.205** | 0.154** | ||||||
马克隆值 MIC | 0.084* | -0.210** | 0.111** | 0.108** | -0.073 | 0.333** | -0.710** | -.0528** | -0.458** | 0.290** | 0.545** | |||||
株高PH | 0.093* | 0.183** | 0.074 | 0.104** | 0.292** | 0.164** | -0.005 | 0.036 | -0.053 | 0.071 | -0.089* | 0.055 | ||||
果枝节位 SBN | 0.066 | 0.544** | 0.145** | -0.245** | 0.652** | 0.166** | 0.099* | 0.149** | -0.027 | 0.087* | -0.248** | -0.125** | 0.342** | |||
纺纱均匀 性指数 SCI | 0.008 | 0.154** | -0.104** | 0.012 | -0.036 | -0.533** | 0.957** | 0.907** | 0.903** | -0.043 | -0.100* | -0.714** | -0.023 | 0.085* | ||
短绒率 SFI | -0.035 | -0.036 | 0.085* | -0.080* | 0.107** | 0.331** | -0.809** | -0.845** | -0.782** | -0.038 | 0.045 | 0.441** | -0.06 | -0.016 | -0.842** | |
子指SI | -0.299** | 0.218** | 0.468** | -0.187** | -0.081* | -0.290** | 0.251** | 0.191** | 0.303** | -0.465** | -0.021 | -0.312** | -0.148** | -0.034 | 0.302** | -0.196** |
表4
17个表型性状前6个主成分的特征向量、特征根、方差贡献率及累积贡献率"
性状 Traits | 特征向量1 PV1 | 特征向量2 PV2 | 特征向量3 PV3 | 特征向量4 PV4 | 特征向量5 PV5 | 特征向量6 PV6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
铃数BN | -0.011 | -0.055 | 0.464 | 0.044 | 0.051 | 0.231 |
吐絮期BOD | 0.076 | 0.448 | -0.038 | 0.186 | -0.274 | -0.146 |
单铃重BW | -0.038 | 0.175 | -0.223 | 0.432 | 0.520 | 0.354 |
果枝数FBN | 0.002 | -0.311 | 0.282 | -0.116 | -0.236 | 0.486 |
开花期FD | -0.021 | 0.475 | 0.172 | 0.130 | -0.218 | -0.095 |
伸长率FE | -0.252 | 0.245 | 0.120 | -0.314 | 0.349 | 0.100 |
纤维长度FL | 0.416 | 0.018 | 0.075 | -0.052 | 0.034 | -0.023 |
纤维整齐度FLU | 0.387 | 0.045 | 0.162 | 0.034 | 0.203 | -0.040 |
纤维强度FS | 0.390 | -0.119 | 0.019 | 0.138 | -0.070 | -0.038 |
衣分LP | -0.046 | -0.037 | 0.447 | 0.251 | 0.460 | -0.291 |
成熟度MAT | -0.030 | -0.344 | 0.019 | 0.593 | -0.266 | -0.119 |
马克隆值MIC | -0.313 | -0.145 | 0.116 | 0.364 | 0.039 | -0.039 |
株高PH | -0.015 | 0.195 | 0.269 | 0.105 | -0.189 | 0.554 |
果枝节位SBN | 0.033 | 0.427 | 0.184 | 0.164 | -0.161 | -0.006 |
纺纱均匀性指数SCI | 0.432 | 0.003 | 0.047 | -0.022 | 0.035 | -0.025 |
短绒率SFI | -0.372 | 0.042 | -0.124 | 0.004 | -0.163 | -0.057 |
子指SI | 0.163 | 0.070 | -0.490 | 0.196 | 0.075 | 0.359 |
特征值 E | 5.278 | 3.030 | 2.119 | 1.492 | 1.134 | 0.996 |
方差贡献率 CR (%) | 31.044 | 17.823 | 12.466 | 8.778 | 6.671 | 5.860 |
累积贡献率 CCR (%) | 31.044 | 48.868 | 61.334 | 70.112 | 76.782 | 82.642 |
表5
F值高(top 5%)与F值低(top 5%)的材料的表型均值及F值与17个表型性状的相关系数"
性状 Traits | F值高 F-low | F值低 F-high | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient value |
---|---|---|---|
铃数BN | 11.904b | 12.969a | 0.212** |
吐絮期BOD | 130.071b | 136.304a | 0.473** |
单铃重BW | 4.967b | 5.363a | 0.217** |
果枝数FBN | 11.289 | 11.222 | -0.108** |
开花期FD | 70.201b | 73.078a | 0.426** |
伸长率FE | 9.657a | 8.544b | -0.206** |
纤维长度FL | 26.516b | 32.531a | 0.765** |
纤维整齐度FLU | 82.727b | 85.848a | 0.822** |
纤维强度FS | 27.406b | 32.232a | 0.616** |
衣分LP | 32.373 | 33.142 | 0.191** |
成熟度MAT | 0.853a | 0.845b | -0.217** |
马克隆值MIC | 4.984a | 4.173b | -0.511** |
株高PH | 69.548b | 75.688a | 0.350** |
果枝节位SBN | 6.205b | 6.595a | 0.519** |
纺纱均匀性指数SCI | 112.010b | 159.429a | 0.774** |
短绒率SFI | 6.276a | 4.010b | -0.706** |
子指SI | 11.476b | 12.535a | 0.228** |
表型综合值F | 0.369 | 0.638 | 1.000 |
表6
不同类群17个性状的均值"
性状 Traits | Ⅰ-Ⅰ | Ⅰ-Ⅱ | Ⅱ-Ⅰ | Ⅱ-Ⅱ | Ⅲ-Ⅰ | Ⅲ-Ⅱ | Ⅳ-Ⅰ | Ⅳ-Ⅱ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
吐絮期BOD | 136.086 | 134.776 | 134.509 | 134.637 | 132.304 | 129.857 | 133.732 | 132.636 |
开花期FD | 73.251 | 72.305 | 72.611 | 72.595 | 70.863 | 70.090 | 72.315 | 71.615 |
株高PH | 76.395 | 74.229 | 72.808 | 73.280 | 68.375 | 69.644 | 72.609 | 70.685 |
果枝节位SBN | 6.639 | 6.502 | 6.508 | 6.512 | 6.245 | 6.202 | 6.456 | 6.352 |
铃数BN | 13.006 | 12.742 | 12.838 | 13.052 | 11.657 | 12.226 | 12.662 | 12.093 |
单铃重BW | 5.377 | 5.366 | 5.408 | 5.466 | 4.660 | 5.131 | 5.414 | 5.311 |
果枝数FBN | 11.248 | 11.218 | 11.159 | 11.188 | 11.239 | 11.325 | 11.191 | 11.235 |
衣分LP | 33.439 | 34.805 | 35.203 | 35.641 | 30.920 | 33.310 | 34.944 | 33.732 |
子指SI | 12.383 | 12.324 | 11.787 | 11.978 | 10.982 | 11.641 | 11.695 | 11.720 |
伸长率FE | 8.622 | 8.804 | 9.740 | 9.492 | 9.713 | 9.558 | 9.709 | 9.531 |
纤维长度FL | 32.382 | 31.702 | 29.524 | 30.306 | 25.405 | 27.080 | 28.952 | 28.215 |
纤维整齐度FLU | 85.901 | 85.651 | 84.713 | 85.105 | 81.457 | 83.282 | 84.338 | 83.868 |
纤维强度FS | 32.203 | 31.640 | 29.281 | 29.964 | 26.539 | 27.743 | 28.501 | 28.314 |
成熟度MAT | 0.844 | 0.846 | 0.845 | 0.846 | 0.854 | 0.852 | 0.846 | 0.849 |
马克隆值MIC | 4.185 | 4.317 | 4.590 | 4.530 | 5.030 | 4.915 | 4.659 | 4.717 |
纺纱均匀性指数SCI | 159.334 | 153.906 | 136.109 | 141.881 | 101.329 | 117.271 | 130.397 | 125.746 |
短绒率SFI | 4.031 | 4.353 | 5.211 | 4.912 | 7.486 | 5.788 | 5.417 | 5.640 |
表型综合值 F | 0.644 | 0.602 | 0.542 | 0.569 | 0.312 | 0.401 | 0.513 | 0.464 |
[1] | 喻树迅, 范术丽, 王寒涛, 魏恒玲, 庞朝友. 中国棉花高产育种研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(18):3465-3476. |
YU S X, FAN S L, WANG H T, WEI H L, PANG C Y. Research progress on high-yield cotton breeding in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(18):3465-3476. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 喻树迅, 魏晓文, 赵新华. 中国棉花生产与科技发展. 棉花学报, 2000(6):327-329. |
YU S X, WEI X W, ZHAO X H. China's cotton production and technological development. Cotton Science, 2000(6):327-329. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 杜雄明, 孙君灵, 周忠丽, 贾银华, 潘兆娥, 何守朴, 庞保印, 王立如. 棉花资源收集、保存、评价与利用现状及未来. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012,13(2):163-168. |
DU X M, SUN J L, ZHOU Z L, JIA Y H, PAN Z E, HE S P, PANG B Y, WANG L R. Current status and future of cotton resource collection, conservation, evaluation andutilization. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2012,13(2):163-168. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 杨旭, 刘飞, 张宇, 成玉富, 薛林宝, 陈学好. 利用SSR标记研究茄子种质资源遗传多样性. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2016,35(12):3450-3457. |
YANG X, LIU F, ZHANG Y, CHENG Y F, XUE L B, CHEN X H. Using SSR markers to study the genetic diversity of eggplant germplasm resources. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2016,35(12):3450-3457. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 周忠丽, 杜雄明, 刘国强, 程德荣, 孙君灵, 石玉真. 陆地棉优良种质综合评价. 植物遗传资源科学, 2002(2):13-18. |
ZHOU Z L, DU X M, LIU G Q, CHENG D R, SUN J L, SHI Y Z. Comprehensive evaluation of the excellent germplasm of upland cotton. Plant Genetic Resources Science, 2002(2):13-18. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 李慧琴, 于娅, 王鹏, 刘记, 胡伟, 鲁丽丽, 秦文强. 270份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状与品质性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019,20(4):903-910. |
LI H Q, YU Y, WANG P, LIU J, HU W, LU L L, QIN W Q. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic and quality traits of 270 upland cotton germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019,20(4):903-910. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 代攀虹, 孙君灵, 何守朴, 王立如, 贾银华, 潘兆娥, 庞保印, 杜雄明, 王谧. 陆地棉核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(19):3694-3708. |
DAI P H, SUN J L, HE S P, WANG L R, JIA Y H, PAN Z E, PANG B Y, DU X M, WANG M. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits of upland cotton core collection. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(19):3694-3708. (in Chinese) | |
[8] |
王俊铎, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 艾先涛, 郭江平, 莫明, 李雪源, 郑巨云. 200份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性分析. 新疆农业科学, 2020,57(9):1623-1629.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.09.007 |
WANG J D, GONG Z L, LIANG Y J, AI X T, GUO J P, MO M, LI X Y, ZHENG J Y. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic traits in 200 upland cotton germplasm resources. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020,57(9):1623-1629. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.09.007 |
|
[9] | 葛浩, 胡道武, 何守朴, 李洪戈, 王晓阳, 庞保印, 陈全家, 杜雄明. 376份陆地棉棉铃早期性状的多样性分析. 分子植物育种, 2021: 1-18. [2021-11-15]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20210406.1014.004.html. |
GE H, HU D W, HE S P, LI H G, WANG X Y, PANG B Y, CHEN Q J, DU X M. Diversity analysis of early traits of 376 upland cotton bolls. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021: 1-18.[2021-11-15]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20210406.1014.004.html.(in Chinese) | |
[10] | 杨涛, 黄雅婕, 李生梅, 任丹, 崔进鑫, 庞博, 于爽, 高文伟. 海岛棉种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2021,54(12):2499-2509. |
YANG T, HUANG Y J, LI S M, REN D, CUI J X, PANG B, YU S, GAO W W. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits of island cotton germplasm resources. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021,54(12):2499-2509. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 刘方, 王春英, 王玉红, 高伟, 周忠丽, 蔡小彦, 王星星, 王坤波. 103份亚洲棉表型多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014,15(3):491-497. |
LIU F, WANG C Y, WANGY H, GAO W, ZHOU Z L, CAI X Y, WANG X X, WANG K B. Phenotypic diversity analysis of 103 Asian cottons. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2014,15(3):491-497. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 何守朴. 外源渐渗对栽培陆地棉群体分化和纤维品质的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2020. |
HE S P. The effect of exogenous infiltration on the differentiation and fiber quality of cultivated upland cotton[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 杜雄明, 周忠丽, 刘国强. 棉花种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. |
DU X M, ZHOU Z L, LIU G Q. Descriptor and Data Standard for Cotton (Gossypium Spp). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. (in Chinese) | |
[14] |
KEYLOCK C J. Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos, 2005,109(1):203-207.
doi: 10.1111/oik.2005.109.issue-1 |
[15] |
胡标林, 万勇, 李霞, 雷建国, 罗向东, 严文贵, 谢建坤. 水稻核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 作物学报, 2012,38(5):829-839.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00829 |
HU B L, WAN Y, LI X, LEI J G, LUO X D, YAN W G, XIE J K. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits in rice core collections. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012,38(5):829-839. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00829 |
|
[16] |
YUAN Y C, XING H X, ZENG W G, XU J L, MAO L L, WANG L Y, FENG W, TAO J C, WANG H R, ZHANG H J, WANG Q K, ZHANG G H, SONG X L, SUN X Z. Genome-wide association and differential expression analysis of salt tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum L. at the germination stage. BMC Plant Biology, 2019,19:394.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1989-2 |
[17] | 梁森苗, 张淑文, 郑锡良, 任海英, 朱婷婷, 戚行江. 杨梅生长指标与果实品质间的相关性分析. 核农学报, 2019,33(4):751-758. |
LIANG S M, ZHANG S W, ZHENG X L, REN H Y, ZHU T T, QI X J. Correlation analysis between bayberry growth indicators and fruit quality. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019,33(4):751-758. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 王恩军, 陈垣, 韩多红, 蔡子平, 张芬琴, 张勇. 菘蓝农艺性状与药材产量的相关和通径分析. 核农学报, 2018,32(2):399-406. |
WANG E J, CHEN Y, HAN D H, CAI Z P, ZHANG F Q, ZHANG Y. Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits and medicinal material yield of Isatis indigotica. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018,32(2):399-406. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 王慧敏, 彭振英, 李新国, 万书波, 张智猛, 丁红, 高文伟. 67个花生品种主要农艺性状的变异及相关性分析. 山东农业科学, 2019,51(9):91-96. |
WANG H M, PENG Z Y, LI X G, WAN S B, ZHANG Z M, DING H, GAO W W. Variation and correlation analysis of main agronomic characters of 67 peanut varieties. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019,51(9):91-96. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 刘剑光, 赵君, 徐剑文, 吴巧娟, 肖松华. 200份陆地棉种质资源的遗传多样性分析. 江苏农业科学, 2021,49(14):66-69. |
LIU J G, ZHAO J, XU J W, WU Q J, XIAO S H. Genetic diversity analysis on 200 upland cotton germplasm resources. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021,49(14):66-69. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 王天友, 王有武, 曹新川, 刘春艳, 秦宁, 何良荣. 南疆陆地棉种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 种子, 2020,39(4):5-11. |
WANG T Y, WANG Y W, CAO X C, LIU C Y, QIN N, HE L R. Analysis of genetic diversity of phenotypic traits of upland cotton germplasm resources in Southern Xinjiang. Seed, 2020,39(4):5-11. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 王辉, 王天友, 曹新川, 刘春艳, 张凤娇, 何良荣. 南疆陆地棉种质资源遗传多样性及群体结构分析. 分子植物育种, 2021: 1-27.[2021-11-15]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20210520.0954.002.html. |
WANG H, WANG T Y, CAO X C, LIU C Y, ZHANG F J, HE L R. Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of upland cotton germplasm resources in Southern Xinjiang. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021: 1-27.[2021-11-15]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20210520.0954.002.html.(in Chinese) | |
[23] | 刘娜, 高文伟. 陆地棉耐盐表型数据的遗传多样性研究 种子, 2019, 38(11): 57-62+67. |
LIU N, GAO W W. Study on genetic diversity of salt tolerance phenotype data in upland cotton. Seed, 2019, 38(11): 57-62+67. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 钱能. 陆地棉遗传多样性与育种目标性状基因(QTL)的关联分析[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2009. |
QIAN N. Association analysis between genetic diversity of upland cotton and breeding target trait genes (QTL)[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2009. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 陈伟. 主成份分析法用于评价需注意的若干问题. 人类工效学, 2002(1):30-33. |
CHEN W. The principal component analysis method is used to evaluate several problems that need attention. Human Ergonomics, 2002(1):30-33. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 李艳红, 聂俊, 郑锦荣, 谭德龙, 张长远, 史亮亮, 谢玉明. 华南地区樱桃番茄表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 园艺学报, 2021,48(9):1717-1730. |
LI Y H, NIE J, ZHENG J R, TAN D L, ZHANG C Y, SHI L L, XIE Y M. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the genetic diversity of the phenotypic characters of cherry tomato in South China. Acta Horticulture, 2021,48(9):1717-1730. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 唐凤, 李瑶, 王永琪, 张树振, 张永超, 张博. 22份野生披碱草属种质农艺性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 种子, 2021,40(6):44-51. |
TANG F, LI Y, WANG Y Q, ZHANG S Z, ZHANG Y C, ZHANG B. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic traits of 22 wild Elymus spp. germplasm. Seed, 2021,40(6):44-51. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | FANG-CHI H, KRITCHEVSKY S B, LIU Y M, ALKA K, NEWMAN A B, PERRY S E, MARJOLEIN V, MACRO V, HARRIS T B, NICKLAS B J. Association between inflammatory components and physical function in the health, aging, and body composition study: A principal component analysis approach. Journal of Gerontology, 2009,64(5):581-589. |
[29] | 贾瑞玲, 赵小琴, 南铭, 陈富, 刘彦明, 魏立平, 刘军秀, 马宁. 64份苦荞种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性分析与综合评价. 作物杂志, 2021(3):19-27. |
JIA R L, ZHAO X Q, NAN M, CHEN F, LIU Y M, WEI L P, LIU J X, MA N. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of genetic diversity of agronomic traits of 64 Tartary Buckwheat germplasm resources. Crops, 2021(3):19-27. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 钱玉源, 刘祎, 崔淑芳, 王广恩, 张曦, 金卫平, 李俊兰. 基于表型的棉花种质资源遗传多样性分析及核心种质的抽提. 华北农学报, 2019,34(S1):29-35. |
QIAN Y Y, LIU Y, CUI S F, WANG G E, ZHANG X, JIN W P, LI J L. Phenotype-based analysis of genetic diversity of cotton germplasm resources and extraction of core collections. Journal of North China Agriculture, 2019,34(S1):29-35. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 董承光, 王娟, 周小凤, 马晓梅, 李生秀, 余渝, 李保成. 基于表型性状的陆地棉种质资源遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016,17(3):438-446. |
DONG C G, WANG J, ZHOU X F, MA X M, LI S X, YU Y, LI B C. Analysis of genetic diversity of upland cotton germplasm resources based on phenotypic traits. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016,17(3):438-446. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 孔清泉, 杨兆光, 吴振江, 谢业涛, 李强, 肖远龙. 陆地棉92份种质资源主要性状的遗传多样性分析. 棉花科学, 2020,42(3):33-40. |
KONG Q Q, YANG Z G, WU Z J, XIE Y T, LI Q, XIAO Y L. Analysis of genetic diversity of main characters of 92 upland cotton germplasm resources. Cotton Science, 2020,42(3):33-40. (in Chinese) | |
[33] | 尹会会, 李秋芝, 李海涛, 王士红, 李彤, 商娜, 张晗, 杨中旭. 134份国外陆地棉种质主要农艺性状与纤维品质性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017,18(6):1105-1115. |
YIN H H, LI Q Z, LI H T, WANG S H, LI T, SHANG N, ZHANG H, YANG Z X. Analysis of genetic diversity of 134 foreign upland cotton germplasm main agronomic traits and fiber quality traits. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017,18(6):1105-1115. (in Chinese) | |
[34] | 刘翔宇, 赵龙, 巴哈尔古丽·先木西, 彭华, 阿不都热衣木·玉拉音. 新疆陆地棉种质资源的综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(24):4679-4692. |
LIU X Y, ZHAO L, BAHAERGULI·X M X, PENG H, ABUDUREYIMU·Y L Y. Comprehensive evaluation of upland cotton germplasm resources in Xinjiang. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(24):4679-4692. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | 邓艳凤, 肖水平, 王涛, 杨绍群, 杨秀, 刘新稳. 早熟棉12份新品系主要性状的分析与综合评价. 棉花科学, 2020,42(4):14-20. |
DENG Y F, XIAO S P, WANG T, YANG S Q, YANG X, LIU X W. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of main characters of 12 new lines of early maturing cotton. Cotton Science, 2020,42(4):14-20. (in Chinese) | |
[36] | 戴茂华, 刘丽英, 唐长波, 吕德智, 吴振良. 冀中南棉花新品种产量性状与品质性状的综合评价分析. 江西农业学报, 2015,27(4):4-7. |
DAI M H, LIU L Y, TANG C B, LÜ D Z, WU Z L. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of yield and quality traits of new cotton varieties in central and southern Hebei. Jiangxi Journal of Agriculture, 2015,27(4):4-7. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16. |
[2] | 王洋洋,刘万代,贺利,任德超,段剑钊,胡新,郭天财,王永华,冯伟. 基于多元统计分析的小麦低温冻害评价及水分效应差异研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318. |
[3] | 宋松泉,刘军,唐翠芳,程红焱,王伟青,张琪,张文虎,高家东. 种子耐脱水性的生理及分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1047-1063. |
[4] | 卞能飞, 孙东雷, 巩佳莉, 王幸, 邢兴华, 金夏红, 王晓军. 花生烘烤食用品质评价及指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 641-652. |
[5] | 沈倩,张思平,刘瑞华,刘绍东,陈静,葛常伟,马慧娟,赵新华,杨国正,宋美珍,庞朝友. 棉花出苗期耐冷综合评价体系的构建及耐冷指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355. |
[6] | 杜金霞,李奕莎,李美霖,陈文浛,张木清. 甘蔗不同基因型对白条病抗性的评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130. |
[7] | 胡馨, 张职亮, 张飞, 邓波, 房伟民. 大花型茶专用菊杂交后代株系的综合评价与筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051. |
[8] | 谢晓宇, 王凯鸿, 秦晓晓, 王彩香, 史春辉, 宁新柱, 杨永林, 秦江鸿, 李朝周, 马麒, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉吐絮率的限制性两阶段多位点全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(2): 248-264. |
[9] | 万映伶,朱梦婷,刘爱青,金亦佳,刘燕. 中国观赏芍药表型多样性解析与资源评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3629-3639. |
[10] | 陈学森,王楠,张宗营,毛志泉,尹成苗. 关于果树种质资源与遗传育种若干问题的理解与思考[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3395-3410. |
[11] | 杨程,龚桂芝,彭祝春,常珍珍,易璇,洪棋斌. 基于cpInDel标记和cpSSR标记的柑橘属及近缘属植物亲缘关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3210-3223. |
[12] | 沈志军, 田雨, 蔡志翔, 徐子媛, 严娟, 孙朦, 马瑞娟, 俞明亮. 基于国家果树种质南京桃资源圃的桃褐腐病抗性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 3018-3028. |
[13] | 解斌,安秀红,陈艳辉,程存刚,康国栋,周江涛,赵德英,李壮,张艳珍,杨安. 不同苹果砧木对持续低磷的响应及适应性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2598-2612. |
[14] | 王娟, 马晓梅, 周小凤, 王新, 田琴, 李成奇, 董承光. 棉花产量构成因素性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2265-2277. |
[15] | 徐晓,任根增,赵欣蕊,常金华,崔江慧. 中国高粱地方品种和育成品种穗部表型性状精准鉴定及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108. |
|