|
|
|
|
|
| Energy Requirements for Maintenance and Growth of German Mutton Merino Crossbred Lambs |
| DENG Kai-dong, DIAO Qi-yu, JIANG Cheng-gang, TU Yan, ZHANG Nai-feng, LIU Jie, MA Tao |
1.Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2.College of Animal Science, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 210038, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 A comparative slaughter trial and a metabolism trial were conducted to determine the requirement of net energy (NE) and metabolizable energy (ME) by the crossbreed of German Mutton Merino×Inner Mongolia Merino for fattening from 35 to 50 kg of body weight (BW). 49 crossbred female lambs ((33.9±2.3) (SD) kg BW) of German Mutton Merino×Inner Mongolia Merino were used. 34 lambs were randomly chosen for comparative slaughter, which were offered an identical mixture diet (concentrate:roughage=55:45) at 100, 75 or 55% of ad libitum intake, whereas the remainders were used in the metabolism trial to evaluate the ME of the diet after methane production was measured by open-circuit respirometry. As feed intake decreased from 100 to 75 and 55% of ad libitum intake, the apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM) linearly increased (P=0.010) from 60.8 to 63.6 and 66.9%, respectively, and methane production decreased from 52.1 to 44.3 and 39.9 L d-1, respectively, but the ratio of methane energy to gross energy intake increased linearly (P=0.010) from 8.20 to 8.96 and 10.97%, respectively. Consequently, the ME values of the diet increased from 9.35 to 9.64 and 9.85 MJ kg-1 DM, respectively. The NE requirement for maintenance (NEm) was 255 kJ kg-1 BW0.75, and the ME requirement for maintenance (MEm) was 352 kJ kg-1 BW0.75, with a partial energy efficiency for maintenance (km) of 0.72. The NE requirement for growth (NEg) ranged from 1.26 to 4.66 MJ d-1 as average daily gains increased from 100 to 300 g d-1, with a partial energy efficiency for growth (kg) of 0.45. These results indicated that the NEg required by crossbred female lambs of German Mutton Merino×Inner Mongolia Merino was lower than the recommendation of the American or British nutritional system.
Abstract A comparative slaughter trial and a metabolism trial were conducted to determine the requirement of net energy (NE) and metabolizable energy (ME) by the crossbreed of German Mutton Merino×Inner Mongolia Merino for fattening from 35 to 50 kg of body weight (BW). 49 crossbred female lambs ((33.9±2.3) (SD) kg BW) of German Mutton Merino×Inner Mongolia Merino were used. 34 lambs were randomly chosen for comparative slaughter, which were offered an identical mixture diet (concentrate:roughage=55:45) at 100, 75 or 55% of ad libitum intake, whereas the remainders were used in the metabolism trial to evaluate the ME of the diet after methane production was measured by open-circuit respirometry. As feed intake decreased from 100 to 75 and 55% of ad libitum intake, the apparent digestibility of dry matter (DM) linearly increased (P=0.010) from 60.8 to 63.6 and 66.9%, respectively, and methane production decreased from 52.1 to 44.3 and 39.9 L d-1, respectively, but the ratio of methane energy to gross energy intake increased linearly (P=0.010) from 8.20 to 8.96 and 10.97%, respectively. Consequently, the ME values of the diet increased from 9.35 to 9.64 and 9.85 MJ kg-1 DM, respectively. The NE requirement for maintenance (NEm) was 255 kJ kg-1 BW0.75, and the ME requirement for maintenance (MEm) was 352 kJ kg-1 BW0.75, with a partial energy efficiency for maintenance (km) of 0.72. The NE requirement for growth (NEg) ranged from 1.26 to 4.66 MJ d-1 as average daily gains increased from 100 to 300 g d-1, with a partial energy efficiency for growth (kg) of 0.45. These results indicated that the NEg required by crossbred female lambs of German Mutton Merino×Inner Mongolia Merino was lower than the recommendation of the American or British nutritional system.
|
|
Received: 10 November 2011
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was conducted as part of the National Technology Program for Meat Sheep Industry of China (nycytx- 39) and funded by the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence DIAO Qi-yu, Tel: +86-10-82106055, Fax: +86-10-82106090, E-mail: diaoqiyu@mail.caas.net.cn
|
| About author: DENG Kai-dong, E-mail: kdeng@jit.edu.cn |
Cite this article:
DENG Kai-dong, DIAO Qi-yu, JIANG Cheng-gang, TU Yan, ZHANG Nai-feng, LIU Jie, MA Tao.
2013.
Energy Requirements for Maintenance and Growth of German Mutton Merino Crossbred Lambs. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(4): 670-677.
|
| [1]AFRC. 1993. Energy and Protein Requirements ofRuminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRCTechnical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CABInternational, Wallingford, UK.AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed.Association of Official Analytical Chemists,Washington, D. C.ARC. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of RuminantLivestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux,Slough, UK.[2]Chizzotti M L, Tedeschi L O, Valadares Filho S C. 2008. Ameta-analysis of energy and protein requirements formaintenance and growth of Nellore cattle. Journal ofAnimal Science, 86, 1588-1597[3]Chizzotti M L, Valadares Filho S C, Tedeschi L O, Chizzotti F H, Carstens G E. 2007. Energy and protein requirementsfor growth and maintenance of F1 Nellore×Red Angusbulls, steers, and heifers. Journal of Animal Science,85, 1971-1981[4]CSIRO. 2007. Nutrient Requirements of DomesticatedRuminants. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.Dawson L E R, Steen R W J. 1998. Estimation of maintenanceenergy requirements of beef cattle and sheep. Journalof Agricultural Science, 131, 477-485[5]Degen A A, Young B A. 2002. Effect of air temperature andenergy intake on body mass, body composition andenergy requirements in sheep. Journal of AgriculturalScience, 138, 221-226[6]Fernandes M H, Resende K T, Tedeschi L O, Fernandes JS, Silva Jr H M, Carstens G E, Berchielli T T, Teixeira I A,Akinaga L. 2007. Energy and protein requirements formaintenance and growth of Boer crossbred kids.Journal of Animal Science, 85, 1014-1023[7]Ferrell C L. 1988. Contribution of visceral organs to animalenergy expenditures. Journal of Animal Science, 66,23-34[8]Galvani D B, Pires C C, Kozloski G V, Wommer T P. 2008.Energy requirements of Texel crossbred lambs. Journalof Animal Science, 86, 3480-3490[9]INRA. 1989. Ruminant Nutrition: RecommendedAllowances and Feed Tables. John Libbey & Co. Ltd.,Paris, France.Jassim R A M A, Hassan S A, Al-Ani A N. 1996.Metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance andgrowth of Awassi lambs. Small Ruminant Research,20, 239-245[10]Kamalzadeh A, Shabani A. 2007. Maintenance and growthrequirements for energy and nitrogen of Baluchi sheep.International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 9,535-539[11]Lofgreen G P, Garrett W N. 1968. A system for expressingnet energy requirements and feed values for growingand finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science,27, 793-806[12]NRC. 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants:Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids.National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.Ramírez R G, Huerta J, Kawas J R, Alonso D S, Mireles E,Gómez M V. 1995. Performance of lambs grazing in abuffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) pasture and estimationof their maintenance and energy requirements forgrowth. Small Ruminant Research, 17, 117-121[13]Silva A M A, da Silva Sobrinho A G, Trindade I A C M,Resende K T, Bakke O A. 2003. Net requirements ofprotein and energy for maintenance of wool and hairlambs in a tropical region. Small Ruminant Research,49, 165-171[14]Tedeschi L O, Boin C, Fox D G, Leme P R, Alleoni G F,Lanna D P. 2002. Energy requirement for maintenanceand growth of Nellore bulls and steers fed high-foragediets. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 1671-1682[15]Tovar-Luna I, Goetsch A L, Puchala R, Sahlu T, Carstens GE, Freetly H C, Johnson Z B. 2007. Effects of moderatefeed restriction on energy expenditure by 2-year-oldcrossbred Boer goats. Small Ruminant Research, 72,25-32[16]Turner H G, Taylor C S. 1983. Dynamic factors in models ofenergy utilization with particular reference tomaintenance requirement of cattle. World Review ofNutrition and Dietetics, 42, 135-190. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
