|
|
|
|
|
| GeneticAnalysisofEarlinessTraits inShortSeasonCotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.) |
| SONG Mei-zhen, FAN Shu-li, YUAN Ri-hong, PANG Chao-you , YU Shu-xun |
| Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Anyang 455000, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 Inheritance and interrelationship of phenotype and genotype of earliness traits were evaluated in a diallel analysis involving six early-maturing parents. Date of first square (DFS), date of first flower (DFF), date of first open boll (DFOB), number of node first sympodial branch (NNFSB), and harvested rate before frost (HRBF) as earliness traits of six parents, 15 F1 hybrids and 15 F2 progenies were investigated from 2005 to 2008. The experiment design was a randomized complete block design with three replications. Additive, dominance and epistasis effects were analyzed with ADAA (additivedominance- epistasis) model. HRBF, DFF, and DFOB showed significant additive genetic variances. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.088 (HN, narrow sense) and 0.416 (HNE, environment interaction) for HRBF, to 0.103 (HN) and 0.524 (HNE) for DFF, and to 0.187 (HN) and 0.519 (HNE) for DFOB. Dominance genetic effects for DFS, DFF, DFOB, and NNSFB were stronger than additive effects. Additive-by-additive epistatic effects for DFS, DFOB, and NNSFB were detected and affected by environment. Correlation analysis showed generally that HRBF had a significant negative genetic and phenotypic correlation with DFS, DFOB, and NNFSB; DFS had significant positive genetic and phenotypic correlations with DFF, DFOB, and NNFSB; significant positive genetic and phenotypic correlations were also detected between DFF and DFOB, DFF and NNFSB, DFOB and NNFSB. The results showed that the lower the node to the first fruiting branch and the shorter the plant, the earlier was the onset of squaring, flowering, and boll opening, the higher was the harvest rate before frost. Heredity of earliness traits among parents and their hybrids were also detected and parents A1, A2, B1, B2, and B3 could be used to improve earliness traits of short season cotton cultivars.
Abstract Inheritance and interrelationship of phenotype and genotype of earliness traits were evaluated in a diallel analysis involving six early-maturing parents. Date of first square (DFS), date of first flower (DFF), date of first open boll (DFOB), number of node first sympodial branch (NNFSB), and harvested rate before frost (HRBF) as earliness traits of six parents, 15 F1 hybrids and 15 F2 progenies were investigated from 2005 to 2008. The experiment design was a randomized complete block design with three replications. Additive, dominance and epistasis effects were analyzed with ADAA (additivedominance- epistasis) model. HRBF, DFF, and DFOB showed significant additive genetic variances. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.088 (HN, narrow sense) and 0.416 (HNE, environment interaction) for HRBF, to 0.103 (HN) and 0.524 (HNE) for DFF, and to 0.187 (HN) and 0.519 (HNE) for DFOB. Dominance genetic effects for DFS, DFF, DFOB, and NNSFB were stronger than additive effects. Additive-by-additive epistatic effects for DFS, DFOB, and NNSFB were detected and affected by environment. Correlation analysis showed generally that HRBF had a significant negative genetic and phenotypic correlation with DFS, DFOB, and NNFSB; DFS had significant positive genetic and phenotypic correlations with DFF, DFOB, and NNFSB; significant positive genetic and phenotypic correlations were also detected between DFF and DFOB, DFF and NNFSB, DFOB and NNFSB. The results showed that the lower the node to the first fruiting branch and the shorter the plant, the earlier was the onset of squaring, flowering, and boll opening, the higher was the harvest rate before frost. Heredity of earliness traits among parents and their hybrids were also detected and parents A1, A2, B1, B2, and B3 could be used to improve earliness traits of short season cotton cultivars.
|
|
Received: 11 August 2011
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This study was supported by the the Special Grand Nat ional Science and Technology Project , China (2009ZX08005-020B). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondance YU Shu-xun, Tel: +86-372-2562201, E-mail: yu@cricaas.com.cn
|
Cite this article:
SONG Mei-zhen, FAN Shu-li, YUAN Ri-hong, PANG Chao-you , YU Shu-xun.
2012.
GeneticAnalysisofEarlinessTraits inShortSeasonCotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(12): 1968-1975.
|
| [1]Al-Rawi K M, Kohel R J. 1969. Diallel analysis of yield andother agronomic characters in Gossypium hirsutum L.Crop Science, 9, 779-783.[2]Basbag S, Ekinci R, Gencer O. 2007. Combining ability andheterosis for earliness characters in line testerpopulation of Gossypium hirsutum L. Hereditas, 144,185-190.[3]Braden C A, Smith C W. 2004. Phenology measurementsand fiber associations of near-long staple uplandcotton. Crop Science, 44, 2032-2037.[4]GodoyA S, Palomo G A. 1999. Genetic analysis of earlinessin upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.). II. yield and lintpercentage. Euphytica, 105, 161-166.[5]Godoy S. 1994. Comparative study of earliness estimatorsin cotton (G. hirsutum L.). ITEA Production Vegetal,90, 175-186.[6]Iqbal M, Chang M A, Jabbar A, Iqbal M I, Hassan M, IslamN. 2003. Inheritance of earliness and other charactersin upland cotton. Journal of Biological Sciences, 3,585-590.[7]Jenkins J N, McCarty J C, Wu J, Saha S, Gutierrez O A,Hayes R, Stelly D M. 2007. Genetic effects of thirteenGossypium barbadense L. chromosome substitutionlines in topcrosses with upland cotton cultivars: II fiberquality traits. Crop Science, 47, 561-570.[8]Kassianenko V A, Dragavtsev V A, Razorenov G I,Razorenova T S. 2003. Variability of cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.) with regard to earliness. Genetic Resourcesand Crop Evolution, 50, 157-163.[9]Mao S C, Song M Z, Zhuang J N, Zhang C J. 1999. Studyon productivity of the wheat-cotton double maturingsystem in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Scientia AgriculturaSinica, 32, 107-109.[10](in Chinese)Munro J M. 1971. An analysis of earliness in cotton. CottonGrowing Review, 48, 28-41.[11]Phillip J P, Phillip N J. 2002. Profitability of short seasoncotton genotypes on the high plains of Texas. TexasJournal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 15, 7-14.[12]Rauf S, Khan TM, Sadaqat H A, Khan A I. 2004. Correlationand path coefficient analysis of yield components incotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). International Journalof Agriculture and Biology, 4, 686-688.[13]Richmond T R, Radwan S R H. 1962. A comparative studyof seven methods of measuring earliness of cropmaturity in cotton. Crop Science, 2, 397-400.[14]Saha S, Wu J X, Jenkins J N, McCarty J C, Hayes R, StellyD M. 2010. Genetic dissection of chromosomesubstitution lines of cotton to discover novelGossypium barbadense L. alleles for improvement ofagronomic traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,120, 1193-1205.[15]Saha S, Wu J X, Jenkins J N, McCarty J C, Hayes R, StellyD M. 2011. Delineation of interspecific epistasis on fiberquality traits in Gossypium hirsutum by ADAA analysisof intermated G. barbadense chromosome substitutionlines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122, 1351-1361.[16]Tiffany D, Nalm N R. 1981. Acomparison of twelve methodsof measuring earliness in upland cotton. In: BeltwideCotton Production Research Conference. New Orleans,USA. pp. 101-103.[17]Wu J, Jenkins J N, McCarty Jr J C, Wu D. 2006. Variancecomponent estimation using the additive, dominance,and additive and additive model when genotypes varyacross environments. Crop Science, 46, 174-179.[18]Xu Z C, Zhu J. 1999. An approach for predicting heterosisbased on an additive, dominance and additive additivemodel with environment interaction. Heredity, 82, 510-517.[19]Ye Z H, Zhu J. 2000. Genetic analysis on flowering and bollsetting in upland cotton. III. Genetic behavior at differentdeveloping stage. Acta Genetic Sinica, 27, 800-809. (in Chinese)[20]Yu S X, Song M Z, Fan S L, Wang W, Yuan R H. 2005.Biochemical genetics of short-season cotton cultivarsthat express early maturity without senescence. Journalof Integrative Plant Biology, 47, 334-342.[21]Zhu J. 1993. Methods of predicting genotype value andheterosis for offspring of hybrids. Journal ofBiomathematics, 8, 32-44. (in Chinese)[22]Zhu J. 1995. Analysis of conditional effects and variancecomponents in evelopmental genetics. Genetics, 141,1633-1639.[23]Zhu J. 1997. Genetic Model Analyze Approaches. ChinaAgricultural Publishing Company, Beijing. (in Chinese)[24]Zhu J, Weir B S. 1994. Analysis of cytoplasmic and maternaleffects: II. genetic models for triplod endosperms.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 89, 160-166. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
