Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2021, Vol. 20 Issue (2): 450-459    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63294-4
Section 2: The main factors determining yield and efficiency gaps at different levels Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
The priority of management factors for reducing the yield gap of summer maize in the north of Huang-Huai-Hai region, China
LIU Yue-e, LI Yu-xin, LÜ Tian-fang, XING Jin-feng, XU Tian-jun, CAI Wan-tao, ZHANG Yong, ZHAO Jiu-ran, WANG Rong-huan
Beijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Understanding yield potential, yield gap and the priority of management factors for reducing the yield gap in current intensive maize production is essential for meeting future food demand with the limited resources. In this study, we conducted field experiments using different planting modes, which were basic productivity (CK), farmer practice (FP), high yield and high efficiency (HH), and super high yield (SH), to estimate the yield gap. Different factorial experiments (fertilizer, planting density, hybrids, and irrigation) were also conducted to evaluate the priority of individual management factors for reducing the yield gap between the different planting modes. We found significant differences between the maize yields of different planting modes. The treatments of CK, FP, HH, and SH achieved 54.26, 58.76, 65.77, and 71.99% of the yield potential, respectively. The yield gaps between three pairs: CK and FP, FP and HH, and HH and SH, were 0.76, 1.23 and 0.85 t ha–1, respectively. By further analyzing the priority of management factors for reducing the yield gap between FP and HH, as well as HH and SH, we found that the priorities of the management factors (contribution rates) were plant density (13.29%)>fertilizer (11.95%)>hybrids (8.19%)>irrigation (4%) for FP to HH, and hybrids (8.94%)>plant density (4.84%)>fertilizer (1.91%) for HH to SH. Therefore, increasing the planting density of FP was the key factor for decreasing the yield gap between FP and HH, while choosing hybrids with density and lodging tolerance was the key factor for decreasing the yield gap between HH and SH.
Keywords:  maize       yield gap       management factors priority       hybrid       plant density       fertilizer       irrigation  
Received: 02 April 2020   Accepted:
Fund: We thank the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0300106) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601247) for their financial support.
Corresponding Authors:  ZHAO Jiu-ran, Tel/Fax: +86-10-51503936, E-mail: maizezhao@126.com; WANG Rong-huan, Tel/Fax: +86-10-51503703, E-mail: ronghuanwang@126.com    
About author:  LIU Yue-e, E-mail: lye0520@163.com

Cite this article: 

LIU Yue-e, LI Yu-xin, LÜ Tian-fang, XING Jin-feng, XU Tian-jun, CAI Wan-tao, ZHANG Yong, ZHAO Jiu-ran, WANG Rong-huan . 2021. The priority of management factors for reducing the yield gap of summer maize in the north of Huang-Huai-Hai region, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(2): 450-459.

Abdulai S, Nkegbe P K, Donkoh S A. 2013. Technical efficiency of maize production in northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 5251–5259. Addai K N, Owusu V. 2014. Technical efficiency of maize farmers across various agroecological zones of Ghana. Journal of Agriculture & Rural Development, 3, 149–172. Cao H Z, Li Y N, Chen G F, Chen D D, Qu H R, Ma W Q. 2019. Identifying the limiting factors driving the winter wheat yield gap on smallholder farms by agronomic diagnosis in North China Plain. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18, 2–14. Cassman K G. 1999. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 5952–5959. Chen X P, Cui Z, Gao Q, Zhang Q, Guo S, Ren J, Ye Y, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Xue J, Huang J, Tang Q, Sun Y, Peng X, Fan M, Wang G, Wu L, An N, Wu L, Ma L. 2014. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 514, 486–489. Chen X P, Cui Z L, Vitousek P M, Cassman K G, Matson P A, Bai J, Meng Q, Hou P, Yue S, Römheld V, Zhang F. 2011. Integrated soil–crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 6399–6404. Cui Z, Zhang H, Chen X, Zhang C, Ma W, Huang C, Zhang W, Mi G, Miao Y, Li X, Gao Q, Yang J, Wang Z, Ye Y, Guo S, Lu J, Huang J, Lv S, Sun Y, Liu Y. 2018. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 555, 363–366. Dinnes D L, Karlen D L, Jaynes D B, Kaspar T C, Hatfield J L, Colvin T S, Cambardella C A. 2002. Nitrogen management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching in tile-drained Midwestern soils. Agronomy Journal, 94, 153–171. Duvick D N. 1997. What is yield? In: Edmeades G O, Bänziger M, Mickelson H R, Peña-Valdivia C B, eds., Developing Drought- and Low N-Tolerant Maize. Proceedings of a Symposium, El Batan, Mexico. 25–29 Mar, 1996. CIMMYT, Mexico. pp. 332–335. Evans L T. 1993. Crop Evolution, Adaptation, and Yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Hammer G L, Dong Z, McLean G, Doherty A, Messina C, Schussler J, Zinselmeier C, Paszkiewicz S, Cooper M. 2009. Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the U.S. Corn Belt? Crop Science, 49, 299–312. Hou P, Cui Z L, Bu L D, Yang H S, Zhang F S, Li S K. 2014. Evaluation of a modifed Hybrid-Maize model incorporating a newly developed module of plastic film mulching. Crop Science, 54, 2796–2804. van Ittersum M K, Cassman K G, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z. 2013. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance - A review. Field Crops Research, 143, 4–17. Li S K, Wang C T. 2010. Potential and Ways to High Yield in Maize. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) Liu B H, Chen X P, Cui Z L, Meng Q F, Zhao M. 2015. Research advance in yield potential and yield gap of three major cereal crops. Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture, 23, 525–534. Liu B H, Chen X P, Meng Q F, Yang H S, Wart J V. 2017. Estimating maize yield potential and yield gap with agro-climatic zones in China - Distinguish irrigated and rainfed conditions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 239, 108–117. Liu B H, Wu L, Chen X P, Meng Q F. 2016. Quantifying the potential yield and yield gap of Chinese wheat production. Agronomy Journal, 108, 1890. Liu G, Hou P, Xie R, Ming B, Wang K, Xu W, Liu W, Yang Y, Li S. 2017. Canopy characteristics of high-yield maize with yield potential of 22.5 Mg ha−1. Field Crops Research, 213, 221–230. Liu Z, Yang X, Hubbard K G, Lin X. 2012. Maize potential yields and yield gaps in the changing climate of Northeast China. Global Change Biology, 18, 3441–3454. Liu Z J, Yang X G, Lin X M, Hubbard K G, Lv S, Wang J. 2016a. Maize yield gaps caused by non-controllable, agronomic, and socioeconomic factors in a changing climate of Northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 541, 756–764. Liu Z J, Yang X G, Lin X M, Hubbard K G, Lv S, Wang J. 2016b. Narrowing the agronomic yield gaps of maize by improved soil, cultivar, and agricultural management practices in different climate zones of Northeast China. Earth Interactions, 20, 1–18. Lobell D B, Cassman K G, Field C B. 2009. Crop yield gaps: Their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 179–204. van Loon M P, Adjei-Nsiah S, Descheemaeker K, Akotsen-Mensah C, van Dijk M, Morley T, van Ittersum M K, Reidsma P. 2019. Can yield variability be explained? Integrated assessment of maize yield gaps across smallholders in Ghana. Field Crops Research, 236, 132–144. Meng Q, Hou P, Wu L, Chen X, Cui Z, Zhang F. 2013. Understanding production potentials and yield gaps in intensive maize production in China. Field Crops Research, 143, 91–97. Mueller N D, Gerber J S, Johnston M, Ray D K, Ramankutty N, Foley J A. 2012. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature, 490, 254–257. Ruffo M L, Gentry L F, Henninger A S, Seebauer J R, Below F K. 2015. Evaluating management factor contributions to reduce corn yield gaps. Agronomy Journal, 107, 495–505. Schils R, Olesen J E, Kersebaum K C, Rijk B. 2018. Cereal yield gaps across Europe. European Journal of Agronomy, 101, 109–120. Shi Y S, Li Y, Wang T Y, Song Y C. 2006. Descriptors and Data Standard for Maize (Zea mays L.). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. pp. 3–51. (in Chinese) Sileshi G, Akinnifesi F K, Debusho L K, Beedy T, Ajayi O C, Mong’omba S. 2010. Variation in maize yield gaps with plant nutrient inputs, soil type and climate across sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Research, 116, 1–13. Silva J V, Laborte A G, van Ittersum M K. 2016. Explaining rice yields and yield gaps in Central Luzon, Philippines: An application of stochastic frontier analysis and crop modelling. European Journal of Agronomy, 82, 223–241. Silva J V, Reidsma P, Lourdes Velasco M, Laborte A G, van Ittersum M K. 2018. Intensification of rice-based farming systems in Central Luzon, Philippines: Constraints at field, farm and regional levels. Agricultural System, 165, 55–70. Tollenaar M, Lee E A. 2002. Yield potential, yield stability, and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research, 75, 161–169. VanWart J, Kersebaum K C, Peng S, Milner M, Cassman K G. 2013. Estimating crop yield potential at regional to national scales. Field Crops Research, 143, 34–43. Wang M, Wang L C, Cui Z L, Chen X P, Xie J G, Hou Y P. 2017. Closing the yield gap and achieving high N use efficiency and low apparent N losses. Field Crops Research, 209, 39–46. Xu W, Liu C, Wang K, Xie R, Ming B, Wang Y, Zhang G, Liu G, Zhao R, Fan P, Li S, Hou P. 2017. Adjusting maize plant density to different climatic conditions across a large longitudinal distance in China. Field Crops Research, 212, 126–134. Xue J, Gou L, Shi Z G, Zhao Y S, Zhang W F. 2017a. Effect of leaf removal on photosynthetically active radiation distribution in maize canopy and stalk strength. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16, 85–96. Xue J, Ling G, Zhao Y, Yao M, Yao H, Tian J, Zhang W. 2016. Effects of light intensity within the canopy on maize lodging. Field Crops Research, 188, 133–141. Xue J, Xie R Z, Zhang W F, Wang K R, Hou P, Ming B, Gou L, Li S K. 2017b. Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and -density maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12, 2717–2725. Yang H S, Dobermann A, Cassman K G, Walters D T. 2006. Features, applications, and limitations of the Hybrid-Maize simulation model. Agronomy Journal, 98, 737–748. Zhang F S, Cui Z L, Fan M S, Zhang W F, Chen X P, Jiang R F. 2011. Integrated soil-crop system management: Reducing environmental risk while increasing crop productivity and improving nutrient use efficiency in China. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40, 1051–1057. Zhang J, Jiang X, Xue Y, Li Z, Yu B, Xu L, Lu X, Miao Q, Liu Z, Cui Z. 2019. Closing yield gaps through soil improvement for maize production in coastal saline soil. Agronomy, 9, 573.
[1] Jun Deng, Ke Liu, Xiangqian Feng, Jiayu Ye, Matthew Tom Harrison, Peter de Voil, Tajamul Hussain, Liying Huang, Xiaohai Tian, Meixue Zhou, Yunbo Zhang. Exploring strategies for agricultural sustainability in super hybrid rice using the food–carbon–nitrogen–water–energy–profit nexus framework[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 624-638.
[2] Teng Li, Shumei Wang, Qing Liu, Xuepeng Zhang, Lin Chen, Yuanquan Chen, Wangsheng Gao, Peng Sui. Effects of changing assimilate supply on starch synthesis in maize kernels under high temperature stress[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 639-647.
[3] Xiqiang Li, Yuhong Gao, Zhengjun Cui, Tingfeng Zhang, Shiyuan Chen, Shilei Xiang, Lingling Jia, Bin Yan, Yifan Wang, Lizhuo Guo, Bing Wu . Optimized nitrogen and potassium fertilizers application increases stem lodging resistance and grain yield of oil flax by enhancing lignin biosynthesis[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 659-670.
[4] Zichen Liu, Liyan Shang, Shuaijun Dai, Jiayu Ye, Tian Sheng, Jun Deng, Ke Liu, Shah Fahad, Xiaohai Tian, Yunbo Zhang, Liying Huang. Optimizing nitrogen application and planting density improves yield and resource use efficiency via regulating canopy light and nitrogen distribution in rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 81-91.
[5] Ziwen Shi, Sheng Zhang, Qing He, Xiaoyuan Wang, Bo yang, Tao Yu, Hongyang Yi, Tingzhao Rong, Moju Cao. ZmCals12 impacts maize growth and development by regulating symplastic transport[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 42-55.
[6] Yunji Xu, Xuelian Weng, Shupeng Tang, Xiufeng Jiang, Weiyang Zhang, Kuanyu Zhu, Guanglong Zhu, Hao Zhang, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Alternate wetting and moderate drying irrigation improves rice cooking and eating quality by optimizing lipid and fatty acid synthesis in grains[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 68-80.
[7] Xiaohui Xu, Qiang Chai, Falong Hu, Wen Yin, Zhilong Fan, Hanting Li, Zhipeng Liu, Qiming Wang. Intercropping grain crops with green manure under reduced chemical nitrogen improves the soil carbon stocks by optimizing aggregates in an oasis irrigation area[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 326-338.
[8] Ligong Peng, Sicheng Deng, Wentao Yi, Yizhu Wu, Yingying Zhang, Xiangbin Yao, Pipeng Xing, Baoling Cui, Xiangru Tang. Partial organic fertilizer substitution and water-saving irrigation can reduce greenhouse gas emissions in aromatic rice paddy by regulating soil microorganisms while increasing yield and aroma[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 273-289.
[9] Qinghao Wang, Juan Hu, Weizhen Yu, Limin Gu, Peng Liu, Bin Zhao, Wenchao Zhen, Jiwang Zhang, Baizhao Ren. Shading and waterlogging interactions exacerbate summer maize yield losses by reducing assimilate accumulation and remobilization processes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 92-104.
[10] Lichao Zhai, Shijia Song, Lihua Zhang, Jinan Huang, Lihua Lv, Zhiqiang Dong, Yongzeng Cui, Mengjing Zheng, Wanbin Hou, Jingting Zhang, Yanrong Yao, Yanhong Cui, Xiuling Jia. Subsoiling before winter wheat alleviates the kernel position effect of densely grown summer maize by delaying post-silking root–shoot senescence[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3384-3402.
[11] Ling Ai, Ju Qiu, Jiuguang Wang, Mengya Qian, Tingting Liu, Wan Cao, Fangyu Xing, Hameed Gul, Yingyi Zhang, Xiangling Gong, Jing Li, Hong Duan, Qianlin Xiao, Zhizhai Liu. A naturally occurring 31 bp deletion in TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 causes branched ears in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3322-3333.
[12] Yunji Xu, Xuelian Weng, Shupeng Tang, Weiyang Zhang, Kuanyu Zhu, Guanglong Zhu, Hao Zhang, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Untargeted lipidomic analysis of milled rice under different alternate wetting and soil drying irrigation regimes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3351-3367.
[13] Xiaotian Mi, Wanyi Xie, Lei Fan, Tianli Zhang, Yaru Liu, Gang He. Paired nitrogen management for improving wheat yields while minimizing nitrogen losses[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3626-3640.
[14] Jiahong Yu, Bingbing Luo, Yujie Yang, Suna Ren, Lei Xu, Long Wang, Xianqing Jia, Yiyong Zhu, Keke Yi. Polyphosphate-enriched algae fertilizer as a slow-release phosphorus resource can improve plant growth and soil health[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3656-3670.
[15] Siriyaporn Chanapanchai, Wahdan Fitriya, Ida Bagus Made Artadana, Kanyaratt Supaibulwatana. Important role and benefits of Azolla plants in the management of agroecosystem services, biodiversity, and sustainable rice production in Southeast Asia[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 3004-3023.
No Suggested Reading articles found!