|
|
|
|
|
| Genetic variation in LBL1 contributes to depth of leaf blades lobes between cotton subspecies, Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum |
HE Dao-fang1, 2*, ZHAO Xiang1, 2*, LIANG Cheng-zhen2*, ZHU Tao2, Muhammad Ali Abid2, CAI Yong-ping1, HE Jin-ling1, ZHANG Rui2 |
1 School of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, P.R.China
2 Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Leaf is a essential part of the plants for photosynthetic activities which mainly economize the resources for boll heath. Significant variations of leaf shapes across the Gossypium sp. considerably influence the infiltration of sunlight for photosynthesis. To understand the genetic variants and molecular processes underlying for cotton leaf shape, we used F2 population derived from upland cotton genotype P30A (shallow-lobed leaf) and sea-island cotton genotype ISR (deep-lobed leaf) to map leaf deep lobed phenotype controlling genes LBL1 and LBL2. Genetic analysis and localization results have unmasked the position and interaction between both loci of LBL1 and LBL2, and revealed the co-dominance impact of the genes in regulating depth of leaf blades lobes in cotton. LBL1 had been described as a main gene and member of transcription factor family leucine zipper (HD-ZIPI) from a class I homologous domain factor Gorai.002G244000. The qRT-PCR results elaborated the continuous change in expression level of LBL1 at different growth stages and leaf parts of cotton. Higher expression level was observed in mature large leaves followed by medium and young leaves respectively. For further confirmation, plants were tested from hormonal induction treatments, which explained that LBL1 expression was influenced by hormonal signaling. Moreover, the highest expression level was detected in brassinolides (BR) treatment as compared to other hormones, and this hormone plays an important role in the process of leaf blade lobed formation.
|
|
Received: 08 November 2017
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the Genetically Modified Organisms Breeding Major Projects, China (2016ZX0800 5004, 2016ZX08009003-003-004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601349), and the Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence ZHANG Rui, Tel: +86-10-82106127, E-mail: zhangrui@caas.cn; HE Jin-ling, Tel: +86-551-65786865, E-mail: he-jl@126.com
|
| About author: HE Dao-fang, E-mail: 1102771135@qq.com; ZHAO Xiang, E-mail: 1203831938@qq.com; LIANG Cheng-zhen, Tel: +86-10-82106128, E-mail: liangchengzhen@caas.cn;
* These authors contributed equally to this study. |
Cite this article:
HE Dao-fang, ZHAO Xiang, LIANG Cheng-zhen, ZHU Tao, Muhammad Ali Abid, CAI Yong-ping, HE Jin-ling, ZHANG Rui.
2018.
Genetic variation in LBL1 contributes to depth of leaf blades lobes between cotton subspecies, Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(11): 2394-2404.
|
Andres R J, Bowman D T, Kaur B, Kuraparthy V. 2014. Mapping and genomic targeting of the major leaf shape gene (L.) in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127, 167.
Andres R J, Bowman D T, Lawrence K S, Myers G O, Chee P W, Lubbers E L, Kuraparthy V. 2013. Effect of leaf shape on boll rot incidence in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). International Journal of Plant Breeding & Genetics, 7, 132–138.
Andres R J, Coneva V, Frank M H, Tuttle J R, Samayoa L F, Han S W, Kaur B, Zhu L, Fang H, Bowman D T, Rojas-Pierce M, Haigler C H, Jones D C, Holland J B, Chitwood D H, Kuraparthy V. 2016. Modifications to a LATE MERISTEM IDENTITY1 gene are responsible for the major leaf shapes of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, E57.
Andries J A, Jones J E, Sloane L W, Marshall J G. 1970. Effects of super okra leaf shape on boll rot, yield, and other characters of Upland Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Science, 9, 403–407.
Baker D N, Myhre D L. 1969. Effects of leaf shape and boundary layer thickness on photosynthesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Physiologia Plantarum, 22, 1043–1049.
Chang L, Fang L, Zhu Y, Wu H, Zhang Z, Liu C, Li X, Zhang T. 2016. Insights into interspecific hybridization events in allotetraploid cotton formation from characterization of a gene regulating leaf shape. Genetics, 204, 799–806.
Chitwood D, Klein L, Hanlon R, Chacko S, Greg M, Kitchen C, Miller A, Londo J. 2016. Latent developmental and evolutionary shapes embedded within the grapevine leaf. New Phytologist, 210, 343–355.
Eshed Y, Baum S F, Perea J V, Bowman J L. 2001. Establishment of polarity in lateral organs of plants. Current Biology, 11, 1251–1260.
Eshed Y, Izhaki A, Baum S F, Floyd S K, Bowman J L. 2004. Asymmetric leaf development and blade expansion in Arabidopsis are mediated by KANADI and YABBY activities. Development, 131, 2997.
Hasson A, Blein T, Laufs P. 2010. Leaving the meristem behind: the genetic and molecular control of leaf patterning and morphogenesis. Comptes Rendus - Biologies, 333, 350–360.
Hu Y, Xie Q, Chua N H. 2003. The Arabidopsis auxin-inducible gene ARGOS controls lateral organ size. The Plant Cell, 15, 1951.
Hutchinson J B. 1936. The genetics of cotton. Journal of Genetics, 32, 399–410.
Jiang C, Wright R J, Woo S S, Delmonte T A, Paterson A H. 2000. QTL analysis of leaf morphology in tetraploid Gossypium (cotton). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 100, 409–418.
Karami E, Krieg D R, Quisenberry J E. 1980. Water relations and carbon-14 assimilation of cotton with different leaf morphology. Crop Science, 20, 421–426.
Karami E, Weaver J B. 1980. Dry-matter production, yield, photosynthesis, chlorophyll content and specific leaf weight of cotton in relation to leaf shape and colour. Journal of Agricultural Science, 94, 281–286.
Kidner C A. 2010. The many roles of small RNAs in leaf development. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 37, 13–21.
Lacape J M, Gawrysiak G, Cao T V, Viot C, Llewellyn D, Liu S M, Jacobs J, Becker D, Barroso P A V, de Assuncão J H, Palaï O, Georges S, Jean J, Giband M. 2013. Mapping QTLs for traits related to phenology, morphology and yield components in an inter-specific Gossypium hirsutum×
G. barbadense cotton RIL population. Field Crops Research, 144, 256–267.
Liu J, Meng Y, Chen B, Zhou Z, Mao Y, Lv F, Chen J, Wang Y. 2015. Photosynthetic characteristics of the subtending leaf and the relationships with lint yield and fiber quality in the late-planted cotton. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, 79.
Mattsson J, Ckurshumova W, Berleth T. 2003. Auxin signaling in Arabidopsis leaf vascular development. Plant Physiology, 131, 1327–1339.
Nawab N, Saeed A, Tariq M S, Nadeem K, Mahmood K, Hassan M, Shakil Q, Alam M S, Hussain S I, Khan A. 2011. Inheritance of okra leaf type in different genetic backgrounds and its effects on fibre and agronomic traits in cotton. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 16484–16490.
Nicotra A B, Leigh A, Boyce C K, Jones C S, Niklas K J, Royer D L, Tsukaya H. 2011. The evolution and functional significance of leaf shape in the angiosperms. Functional Plant Biology, 38, 535–552.
Paterson A H, Wendel J F, Gundlach H, Guo H, Jenkins J, Jin D, Llewellyn D, Showmaker K C, Shu S, Udall J, Yoo M J, Byers R, Chen W, Doron-Faigenboim A, Duke M V, Gong L, Grimwood J, Grover C, Grupp K, Hu G, et al. 2012. Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature, 492, 423.
Peebles R H, Kearney T H. 1928. Mendelian inheritance of leaf shape in cotton. Journal of Heredity, 19, 235–238.
Pekker I, Alvarez J P, Eshed Y. 2005. Auxin response factors mediate Arabidopsis organ asymmetry via modulation of KANADI activity. The Plant Cell, 17, 2899.
Pettigrew W T, Heitholt J J, Kevin C V. 1993. Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines. Crop Science, 33, 1295–1299.
Scarpella E, Marcos D, Friml J, Berleth T. 2006. Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport. Developmental Biology, 20, 1015–1027.
Semchenko M, Zobel K. 2007. The role of leaf lobation in elongation responses to shade in the rostte-forming forb Serratula tinctoria (Astreaceae). Annals of Botany, 100, 83–90.
Sessa G, Carabelli M, Ruberti I. 1994. Identification of distinct families of HD-ZIP proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. In: Plant Molecular Biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany. p. 43.
Siso S, Camarero J J, Gilpelegrin E. 2001. Relationship between hydraulic resistance and leaf morphology in broadleaf Quercus species: A new interpretation of leaf lobation. Trees, 15, 341–345.
Tang Y, Zhao C Y, Tan S T, Xue H W. 2016. Arabidopsis type II phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase PI4K 5 regulates auxin biosynthesis and leaf margin development through interacting with membrane-bound transcription factor ANAC078. PLoS Genetics, 12, e1006252.
Vogel S. 2009. Leaves in the lowest and highest winds: Temperature, force and shape. New Phytologist, 183, 13.
William R M, Randy W. 1986. Normal vs. okra leaf yield interactions in cotton. Performance of near-isogenic lines from bulk populations. Crop Science, 26, 219–222.
Wu Z B, Sun J Z. 1987. The effect of leaf shape on yield, quality and resistance of cotton. China Cotton, 5, 5. (in Chinese)
Zgurski J M, Sharma R, Bolokoski D A, Schultz E A. 2005. Asymmetric auxin response precedes asymmetric growth and differentiation of asymmetric leaf1 and asymmetric leaf2 Arabidopsis leaves. The Plant Cell, 17, 77–91.
Zhu Q H, Zhang J, Liu D, Stiller W, Liu D, Zhang Z, Llewellyn D, Wilson I. 2015. Integrated mapping and characterization of the gene underlying the okra leaf trait in Gossypium hirsutum L. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 763–774.
Zhu W, Ma Z B, Li L L, Yuan C. 2009. Comparison of yield, fiber properties and photosynthetic characteristics of CMS-based interspecific hybrid cotton (G. hirsutum×G. barbadense) with different leaf types. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 21, 10–13. (in Chinese)
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
