Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2016, Vol. 15 Issue (2): 381-390    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61141-8
Plant Protection Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effects of insect-resistant transgenic cotton on ground-dwelling beetle assemblages (Coleoptera)
 ZHAO Cai-yun, YU Xiao-dong, LIU Yong-bo, LI Jun-sheng
1、State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences,
Beijing 100012, P.R.China
2、Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101,
P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  We compared the ground-dwelling beetle assemblages under four scenarios in which transgenic Bt (Cry 1Ac) cotton (33B), transgenic Bt (Cry 1Ac)+CpTI cotton (SGK321), conventional cotton (33), conventional cotton (Shiyuan 321) in North China. During the survey in two years (2009–2010), 24 ground beetle species were captured with pitfall traps in 20 plots which included five replicates for each cotton type. No significant difference was observed in the number of ground beetle species captured, activity density, evenness and Shannon-Wiener diversity among the four cotton varieties. Chlaenius posticalis was less abundant in transgenic Bt+CpTI cotton (SGK321) fields than its conventional cotton (Shiyuan 321), but more abundant in transgenic Bt cotton (33B) fields compared with its conventional cotton (33). There was no significant difference for other abundant species between in transgenic cotton and in conventional cotton fields. Based on non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis, ground-dwelling beetle assemblages were similar in transgenic and conventional cotton over the two years, but the ground-dwelling beetle assemblages in transgenic cotton 33B significantly differed from that in the conventional cotton (strain 33) in 2010. No strong evidence that the transgenic cotton effect on ground-dwelling beetle assemblages was found in this study.

Abstract  We compared the ground-dwelling beetle assemblages under four scenarios in which transgenic Bt (Cry 1Ac) cotton (33B), transgenic Bt (Cry 1Ac)+CpTI cotton (SGK321), conventional cotton (33), conventional cotton (Shiyuan 321) in North China. During the survey in two years (2009–2010), 24 ground beetle species were captured with pitfall traps in 20 plots which included five replicates for each cotton type. No significant difference was observed in the number of ground beetle species captured, activity density, evenness and Shannon-Wiener diversity among the four cotton varieties. Chlaenius posticalis was less abundant in transgenic Bt+CpTI cotton (SGK321) fields than its conventional cotton (Shiyuan 321), but more abundant in transgenic Bt cotton (33B) fields compared with its conventional cotton (33). There was no significant difference for other abundant species between in transgenic cotton and in conventional cotton fields. Based on non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis, ground-dwelling beetle assemblages were similar in transgenic and conventional cotton over the two years, but the ground-dwelling beetle assemblages in transgenic cotton 33B significantly differed from that in the conventional cotton (strain 33) in 2010. No strong evidence that the transgenic cotton effect on ground-dwelling beetle assemblages was found in this study.
Keywords:  biodiversity       community       cotton varieties       non-target insects  
Received: 26 January 2015   Accepted:
Fund: 

This study was supported by the the Special Program for New Transgenic Variety Breeding of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2013ZX08012-005 and 2014ZX08012-005).

Corresponding Authors:  LI Jun-sheng, Tel/Fax: +86-10-84915330, E-mail: lijsh@craes.org.cn     E-mail:  lijsh@craes.org.cn
About author:  ZHAO Cai-yun, Tel/Fax: +86-10-84931225, E-mail: zhaocy@craes.org.cn;

Cite this article: 

ZHAO Cai-yun, YU Xiao-dong, LIU Yong-bo, LI Jun-sheng. 2016. Effects of insect-resistant transgenic cotton on ground-dwelling beetle assemblages (Coleoptera). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(2): 381-390.

AlDeeb M A, Wilde G E. 2003. Effect of Bt corn expressing theCry3Bb1 toxin for corn rootworm control on abovegroundnontarget arthropods. Environmental Entomology, 32,1164-1170

Álvarez-Alfageme F, Ortego F, Castanera P. 2009. Bt maizefed-prey mediated effect on fitness and digestive physiologyof the ground predator Poecilus cupreus L. (Coleptera:Carabidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 55, 144-150

Andow D A, Lövei G L, Arpaia S. 2006. Ecological riskassessment for Bt crops. Nature Biotechnology, 24,749-751

Baars M A. 1979. Patterns of movement of radioactive carabidbeetles. Oecologia (Berl.), 44, 125-140

Bagla P. 2010. Hardy cotton-munching pests are latest blow toGM crops. Science, 327, 1439.

Bourassa S, C?bcamo H A, Larney F J, Spence J R. 2008.Carabid assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a rotationof three different crops in southern Alberta, Canaada:a comparison of sustainable and conventional farming.Environment Entomology, 37, 1214-1223

Brust G E, Stinner B R, McCartney D A. 1986. Predator activityand predation in corn agroecosystems. EnvironmentalEntomology, 15, 1017-1021

Candolfi M P, Brown K, Grimm C, Reber B, Schmidli H. 2004.A faunistic approach to assess potential side effects ofgenetically modified Bt-corn on non-target athropods underfield conditions. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 14,129-170

Carrière Y, Christa E K, Manda G C, Christine M Y, Larry A,Huang C Y, Magfurar R, Barron J O, Stuart E M. 2009.Landscape effects of transgenic cotton on non-target antsand beetles. Basic and Applied Ecology, 10, 597-606

Clark M S, Luna J M, Stone N D, Youngman R R. 1994.Generalist predator consumption of armyworm (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) and effect of predator removal on damage inno-till corn. Environmental Entomology, 23, 617-622

Clarke K R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses ofchanges in community structure. Australian Journal ofEcology, 18, 117-143

Deng D A, Wang G Q, Li J. 1983. The observation experimentalon the prey of beetle on aphids. Land ReclamationUniversity of Heilongjiang, 2, 79-82 (in Chinese)

Duelli P, Obrist M K. 2003. Regional biodiversity in anagricultural landscape: The contribution of seminaturalhabitat islands. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 129-138

Floate K D, Cárcamo H A, Blackshaw R E, Postman B,Bourassa S. 2007. Response of ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) field population to four years of Lepidopteraspecific Bt corn production. Environmental Entomology,36, 1269-1274

French B W, Chandler L D, Ellsbury M M, Fuller B W,West M. 2004. Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae)assemblages in a transgenic corn-soybean croppingsystem. Environmental Entomology, 33, 554-563

Hammer Ø, Harper D A T, Ryan P D. 2001. PAST:Paleonotological statistics software package for educationand data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1-9

Hance T. 1987. Predation impact of carabids at differentpopulation densities on Aphis fabae development in sugarbeet. Pedobiologia, 30, 251-262

Harwood J D, Samson R A, Obrycki J J. 2006. No evidencefor the uptake of Cry1Ab Bt-endotoxins by the generalistpredator Scarites subterraneus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) inlaboratory and field experiments. Biocontrol Science andTechnology, 16, 377-388

Huang J K, Mi J W, Lin H, Wang Z J, Chen R J, Hu R F, RozelleS, Pray C. 2010. A decade of Bt cotton in Chinese fields:Assessing the direct effects and indirect externalities of Btcotton adoption in China. Science China (Life Sciences),53, 981-991

Hutchison W D, Burkness E C, Mitchell P D, Moon R D, LeslieT W, Fleischer S J, Abrahamson M, Hamilton K L, SteffeyK L, Gray M E, Hellmich R L, Kaster LV, Hunt T E, WrightR J, Pecinovsky K, Rabaey T L, Flood B R, Raun E S.2010. Areawide suppression of European corn borer withBt maize reaps savings to non-Bt maize growers. Science,330, 222-225

Krebs J R, Wilson J D, Bradbury R B, Siriwardena G M. 1999.The second silent spring? Nature, 400, 611-612

Lawrence S. 2005. Agbio keeps growing. Nature Biotechnology,23, 281-281

Li G P, Feng H Q, Chen P Y, Wu S Y, Liu B, Qiu F. 2010.Effects of transgenic Bt cotton on the population density,oviposition behavior, development, and reproduction of anontarget pest, Adelphocoris suturalis (Hemiptera: Miridae).Environmental Entomology, 39, 1378-1387

Liu C X, Wu K M. 2011. Current progress in research anddevelopment of transgenic cotton and a strategic prospectfor China. Plant Protection, 37, 11-17

Liu Y H, Axmacher J C, Wang C L, Li L T, Yu Z R. 2011. Groundbeetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the intensively cultivatedagricultural landscape of Northern China - implications for biodiversity conservation. Insect Conservation andDiversity, 3, 34-43

Liu Y H, Axmacher J C, Wang C L, Li L T, Yu Z R. 2012. Groundbeetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages of restoredsemi-natural habitats and intensively cultivated fields innorthern China. Restoration Ecology, 20, 234-239

Lövei G L, Sunderland K D. 1996. Ecology and Behavior ofground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Reviewof Entomology, 41, 231-256

Lozzia G C. 1999. Biodiversity and structure of ground beetleassemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Bt corn and itseffects on non-target insects. Bolletino di Zoologia, 31,37-58

Lu Y H, Wu K M, Jiang Y Y, Guo Y Y, Desneux N. 2012.Widespread adoption of Bt cotton and insecticide decreasepromotes biocontrol services. Nature, 487, 362-265

Lu, Y H, Wu K M, Jiang Y Y, Xia B, Li P, Feng H Q, WyckhuysK A G, Guo Y Y. 2010. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple cropscorrelated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China.Science, 328, 1151-1154

Lundgren J G. 2005. Ground beetles as weed control agents:The influence of farm management on granivory. AmericanEntomologist, 51, 224-226

Meissle M, Vojtech E, Poppy G M. 2005. Effects of Bt maizefedprey on the generalist predator Poecilus cupreusL. (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Transgenic Research, 14,123-132

Men X Y, Ge F, Edwards C A, Yardim E N. 2005. The influenceof pesticide applications on Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)and sucking pests in transgenic Bt cotton and nontransgeniccotton in China. Crop Protection, 24, 319-324

Mullin C A, Saunders M C, Leslie T W, Biddinger D J, FleischerS J. 2005. Toxic and behavioral effects to Carabidae of seedtreatments used on Cry3Bb1- and Cry1Ab/c-protected corn.Environmental Entomology, 34, 1626-1636

Naranjo S E. 2005. Long-term assessment of the effectsof transgenic Bt cotton on the abundance of nontargetarthropod natural enemies. Environmental Entomology,34, 1193-1210

Naranjo S E, Head G, Dively G. 2005. Field studies assessingarthropod non-target effects in Bt transgenic crops:Introduction. Environmental Entomology, 34, 1178-1180

Niemelä J, Spence J R, Spence D H. 1992. Habitat associationsand seasonal activity of ground-beetles (Coleoptera:Carabidae) in Central Alberta. Canadian Entomologist,124, 521-540

Peterson J A, Obrycki J J, Harwood J D. 2009. Quantificationof Bt-endotoxin exposure pathways in carabid food websacross multiple transgenic events. Biocontrol Science andTechnology, 19, 613-625

Pielou E C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. Wiley, New York.

Ranjekar P K, Patankar A, Gupta V, Bhatnagar R, Bentur J,Kumar P A. 2003. Genetic engineering of crop plants forinsect resistance. Current Science, 84, 321-329

Raworth D A, Robertson M C, Bittman S. 2004. Effects of dairyslurry application on carabid beetles in tall fescue, BritishColumbia, Canada. Agriculture Ecosystem Environmental,103, 527-534

Romeis J, Lawo N C, Raybould A. 2009. Making effectiveuse of existing data for case-by-case risk assessmentsof genetically engineered crops. Journal of AppliedEntomology, 133, 571-583

Roth D S, Perfecto I. 1994. The effects of management systemson ground-foraging ant diversity in Costa Rica. EcologicalApplications, 4, 423-436

Smith B, Wilson J B. 1996. A consumer’s guide to evennessindices. Oikos, 76, 70-82

Snow A A, Andow D A, Gepts P, Hallerman E M, Power EM, Tiedje A J M, Wolfenbarger L L. 2005. Geneticallyengineered organisms and the environment: currentstatus and recommendations. Ecological Applications, 15,377-404

Snow A A, Palma M P. 1997. Commercialization of transgenicplants: potential ecological risks. BioScience, 47, 86-96

Spence J R, Niemala J K. 1994. Sampling carabid assemblageswith pitfall traps: The madness and the method. CanadianEntomologist, 126, 881-894

SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions). 1997. SPSSBase 7.5 for Windows User’S Guide. SPSS, Chicago.

Stephens E J, John E L, Leslie L A, Antonio D, Carrie B. 2012.The impact of Cry3Bb Bt-maize on two guilds of beneficialbeetles. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 156,72-81

Storer N P, Babcock J M, Schlenz M, Meade T, ThompsonG D, Bing J W, Huckaba R M. 2010. Discovery andcharacterization of field resistance to Bt maize: Spodopterafrugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Puerto Rico. Journalof Economic Entomology, 103, 1031-1038

Suenaga H, Hamamura T. 1998. Laboratory evaluation ofcarabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as predatorsof Diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) larvae.Environmental Entomology, 27, 767-772

Sui S X, Zhao G Z, Li A G, Zhu Q Z, Zhao L F, Li Z S.2008. Analysis on the features of transgenic (Bt+CpTI)insectresistant cotton variety SGK321 and their applicationsin Gemplasm. Science & Technology Review, 26, 42-45(in Chinese)

Sun C G, Zhang Q W, Xu J, Wang Y X, Liu J L. 2003. Effectsof transgenic Bt cotton and transgenic Bt+CpTI cottonon population dynamics of main cotton pests and theirnatural enemies. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 46, 705-712(in Chinese).

Symondson W O C, Sunderland K D, Greenstone M H. 2002.Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents?Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 561-594

Tabashnik B E. 2010. Communal benefits of transgenic corn.Science, 330, 189-190

Tabashnik B E, Sisterson M S, Ellsworth P C, Dennehy T J,Antilla L, Liesner L, Whitlow M, Staten R T, Fabrick J A,Unnithan G C, Yelich A J, Ellers-Kirk C, Harpold V S, LiX, Carrière Y. 2010. Suppressing resistance to Bt cottonwith sterile insect releases. Nature Biotechnology, 28, 1304-1307

Tan W J. 2011. The cultivation areas of transgenic cropsincreased five times. Peking Agriculture, 7, 52-53 (inChinese)

Thayer M K. 2005. 11.7. Staphylinidae. In: Beutel R G, LeschenR A B, eds., Handbook of Zoolog. De Gruyter, Berlin. pp.296-344

Thomazoni D, Degrande P E, Silvie P J, Faccenda O. 2010.Impact of Bollgard genetically modified cotton on thebiodiversity of arthropods under practical field conditionsin Brazil. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 6167-6176

Torres J B, Ruberson J R. 2005a. Canopy and grounddwellingpredatory arthropods in commercial Bt and non-Btcotton fields: patterns and mechanisms. EnvironmentalEntomology, 34, 1242-1256

Torres J B, Ruberson J R. 2005b. Lady beetle species shift inBt and non-Bt cotton Telds. In: Proceedings of the BeltwideCotton Conference. National Cotton Council of America,Memphis, TN. pp. 1630-1638

Torres J B, Ruberson J R. 2007. Abundance and diversityof ground-dwelling arthropods of pest managementimportance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields.Annals of Applied Biology, 150, 27-39

Toschki A, Hothorn L A, Rob-Nickoll M. 2007. Effects ofcultivation of genetically modified Bt maize on epigeicarthropods (Araneae; Carabidae). EnvironmentalEntomology, 36, 967-981

Warwick R M, Clarke K R, Suharsono. 1990. A statisticalanalysis of coral community responses to the 1982-83EI Niño in the Thousand Islands, Indonesia Coral Reefs,8,171-179

Wolfenbarger L L, Naranjo S E, Lundgren J G, Bitzer R J,Watrud L S. 2008. Bt crop effects on functional guilds ofnon-target arthropods: a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 3, 2-11

Wu K M. 2007. Environmental impacts and risk managementstrategies of Bt cotton commercialization in China. Journalof Agricultural Biotechnology, 15, 1-4

Wu K M, Lu Y H, Feng H Q, Jiang Y Y, Zhao J Z. 2008.Suppression of cotton bollworm in multiple crops in Chinain areas with Bt toxin containing cotton. Science, 5896,1676-1678

Xu Y, Wu K M, Li H B, Liu J, Ding R F, Wang F, Ahtam U, LiH Q, Wang D M, Chen X X. 2012. Effects of transgenicBt+CpTI cotton on field abundance of non-target pestsand predators in Xinjiang, China. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 11, 1493-1499

Yu H L, Li Y H, Wu K M. 2011. Risk assessment and ecologicaleffects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on nontargetorganisms. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 53,520-538

Zhou H X, Guo J Y, Wan F H. 2004. Effect of transgenic cry1 Ac+CpTI cotton (SGK321) on population dynamics of pestsand their natural enemies. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 47,538-542 (in Chinese)
[1] Xiaotong Liu, Siwei Liang, Yijia Tian, Xiao Wang, Wenju Liang, Xiaoke Zhang. Effect of land use on soil nematode community composition and co-occurrence network relationship[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2807-2819.
[2] Shuo Yuan, Ruonan Li, Yinjie Zhang, Hao'an Luan, Jiwei Tang, Liying Wang, Hongjie Ji, Shaowen Huang.

Effects of long-term partial substitution of inorganic fertilizer with pig manure and/or straw on nitrogen fractions and microbiological properties in greenhouse vegetable soils [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(6): 2083-2098.

[3] Qianqian Chen, Qian Zhao, Baoxing Xie, Xing Lu, Qi Guo, Guoxuan Liu, Ming Zhou, Jihui Tian, Weiguo Lu, Kang Chen, Jiang Tian, Cuiyue Liang.

Soybean (Glycine max) rhizosphere organic phosphorus recycling relies on acid phosphatase activity and specific phosphorus-mineralizing-related bacteria in phosphate deficient acidic soils [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1685-1702.

[4] Minghui Cao, Yan Duan, Minghao Li, Caiguo Tang, Wenjie Kan, Jiangye Li, Huilan Zhang, Wenling Zhong, Lifang Wu.

Manure substitution improves maize yield by promoting soil fertility and mediating the microbial community in lime concretion black soil [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(2): 698-710.

[5] ZHAO Jun-yang, LU Hua-ming, QIN Shu-tao, PAN Peng, TANG Shi-de, CHEN Li-hong, WANG Xue-li, TANG Fang-yu, TAN Zheng-long, WEN Rong-hui, HE Bing. Soil conditioners improve Cd-contaminated farmland soil microbial communities to inhibit Cd accumulation in rice[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2521-2535.
[6] ZHAO Ruo-nan, CHEN Si-yuan, TONG Cui-hong, HAO Jie, LI Pei-si, XIE Long-fei, XIAO Dan-yu, ZENG Zhen-ling, XIONG Wen-guang. Insights into the effects of pulsed antimicrobials on the chicken resistome and microbiota from fecal metagenomes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1857-1869.
[7] LIANG Hai, FU Li-bo, CHEN Hua, ZHOU Guo-peng, GAO Song-juan, CAO Wei-dong. Green manuring facilitates bacterial community dispersal across different compartments of subsequent tobacco[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1199-1215.
[8] WANG Yuan, ZHOU Hong-zhang, GAO Yu, WANG Ning-wei, LIU Han, YANG Fu-yu, NI Kui-kui. Ensiling vine tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata) residue with Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant as an animal unconventional fodder[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1172-1183.
[9] LI Wei-hua, CHEN Peng, WANG Yu-zhu, LIU Qi-zhi. Characterization of the microbial community response to replant diseases in peach orchards[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1082-1092.
[10] WANG Xin-xin, ZHANG Min, SHENG Jian-dong, FENG Gu, Thomas W. KUYPER. Breeding against mycorrhizal symbiosis: Modern cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties perform more poorly than older varieties except at very high phosphorus supply levels[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 701-715.
[11] QU Zheng, LI Yue-han, XU Wei-hui, CHEN Wen-jing, HU Yun-long, WANG Zhi-gang. Different genotypes regulate the microbial community structure in the soybean rhizosphere[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 585-597.
[12] WANG Dong, XI Yue, SHI Xiao-yan, GUO Chao-li, ZHONG Yu-jie, SONG Chao, GUAN Yu, HUANG Lu, YANG Qi-feng, LI Feng-min. Effects of residual plastic film on crop yield and soil fertility in a dryland farming system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(12): 3783-3791.
[13] ZOU Xiao-xia, HUANG Ming-ming, LIU Yan, SI Tong, ZHANG Xiao-jun, YU Xiao-na, GUO Feng, WAN Shu-bo. Inclusion of peanut in wheat–maize rotation increases wheat yield and net return and improves soil organic carbon pool by optimizing bacterial community[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(11): 3430-3443.
[14] LU Qi-qi, SONG Yuan-feng, PAN Ke-qing, LI Yun, TANG Ming-xin, ZHONG Guo-hua, LIU Jie. Improved crop protection and biodiversity of the agroecosystem by reduced tillage in rice paddy fields in southern China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2345-2356.
[15] ZHANG Yin-Jie, GAO Wei, LUAN Hao-an, TAND Ji-wei, LI Ruo-nan, LI Ming-Yue, ZHANG Huai-zhi, HUANG Shao-wen. Effects of a decade of organic fertilizer substitution on vegetable yield and soil phosphorus pools, phosphatase activities, and the microbial community in a greenhouse vegetable production system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 2119-2133.
No Suggested Reading articles found!