|
|
|
|
|
| Proteomic Analysis of Cucumber Defense Rresponses Induced by Propamocarb |
| WU Peng, QIN Zhi-wei, WU Tao, ZHOU Xiu-yan, XIN Ming , GUO Qian-qian |
| College of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 Propamocarb is an agricultural chemical that has been widely used to protect cucumber plants from downy mildew. To understand the mechanisms of cucumber defense responses to propamocarb, we investigated the physiological and proteomic responses of the cucumber line D0351 with propamocarb application. We found that after treatment with propamocarb, the activities of detoxifying enzymes (glutathione reductase, GR; glutathione S-tramsferase, GST) and soluble sugar content of cucumber fruit were significantly increased, but malonaldehyde (MDA) content was significantly reduced. To identify components of propamocarb responsive signaling, we compared the high resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) protein profiles of control and propamocarb-treated fruits, and identified 18 differentially expressed (13 up-regulated and 5 down-regulated) proteins induced by propamocarb which were determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization timeof- flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). The majority of the proteins had functions related to detoxication, energy and transport, protein biosynthesis, regulating reactions and defending against stresses. A real-time quantitative reverse transcriptional-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to compare transcript and protein accumulation patterns for 18 candidate proteins, and the expression of 14 was consistent at both transcript and protein levels. The responses of cucumber proteome to propamocarb seemed complex; the identified proteins may play an important role in regulating adaptation activities following exposure to propamocarb. Data presented herein may shed light on understanding cucumber fruit defense responses under propamocarb treatment.
Abstract Propamocarb is an agricultural chemical that has been widely used to protect cucumber plants from downy mildew. To understand the mechanisms of cucumber defense responses to propamocarb, we investigated the physiological and proteomic responses of the cucumber line D0351 with propamocarb application. We found that after treatment with propamocarb, the activities of detoxifying enzymes (glutathione reductase, GR; glutathione S-tramsferase, GST) and soluble sugar content of cucumber fruit were significantly increased, but malonaldehyde (MDA) content was significantly reduced. To identify components of propamocarb responsive signaling, we compared the high resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) protein profiles of control and propamocarb-treated fruits, and identified 18 differentially expressed (13 up-regulated and 5 down-regulated) proteins induced by propamocarb which were determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization timeof- flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). The majority of the proteins had functions related to detoxication, energy and transport, protein biosynthesis, regulating reactions and defending against stresses. A real-time quantitative reverse transcriptional-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to compare transcript and protein accumulation patterns for 18 candidate proteins, and the expression of 14 was consistent at both transcript and protein levels. The responses of cucumber proteome to propamocarb seemed complex; the identified proteins may play an important role in regulating adaptation activities following exposure to propamocarb. Data presented herein may shed light on understanding cucumber fruit defense responses under propamocarb treatment.
|
|
Received: 24 October 2012
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21372158). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence QIN Zhi-wei, Tel: +86-451-55190058, Fax: +86-451-55190058, E-mail: qzw303@126.com
E-mail: qzw303@126.com
|
| About author: WU Peng, E-mail: horti.pwu@gmail.com |
Cite this article:
WU Peng, QIN Zhi-wei, WU Tao, ZHOU Xiu-yan, XIN Ming , GUO Qian-qian.
2013.
Proteomic Analysis of Cucumber Defense Rresponses Induced by Propamocarb. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(11): 2022-2035.
|
| [1]Ackerman R S, Cozzarelli N R, Epstein W. 1974.Accumulation of toxic concentrations of methylglyoxalby wild-type Escherichia coli K-12 Journal ofBacteriology, 119, 357-362[2]Ahsan N, Lee D G, Lee S H, Kang K Y, Bahk J D, Choi M S,Lee I J, Renaut J, Lee B H 2007. A comparative proteomicanalysis of tomato leaves in response to waterlogging stress.Physiologia Plantarum, 131, 555-570[3]Ahsan N, Lee D G, Lee W, Alam I, Lee S H, Bahk J D, LeeB H. 2008. Glyphosate-induced oxidative stress in riceleaves revealed by proteomic approach. Plant Physiologyand Biochemistry, 46, 1062-1070[4]Backhaus R A, Kuntz M, Camara B, Bouvier F, Pan Z Q.1994. Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA for a P2 60Sacidic ribosomal protein from Parthenium argentatum.Plant Physiology, 106, 395.[5]Belkhadir Y, Subramaniam R, Dang J L. 2004. Plant diseaseresistance protein signaling: NBS-LRR proteins andtheir partners. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 4, 391-399[6]Bhargava P, Mishra Y, Srivastava A K, Narayan O P, Rai L C.2008. Excess copper induces anoxygenic photosynthesisin Anabaena doliolum: a proteomic assessment of itssurvival strategy. Photosynthesis Research, 96, 61-74[7]Biales A D, Bencic D C, Flick R L, Blocksom K A,Lazorchak J M, Lattier D L. 2011. Proteomic analysis ofa model fish species exposed to individual pesticides anda binary mixture. Aquatic Toxicology, 101, 196-206[8]Bohler S, Bagard M, Oufir M, Planchon S, Hoffmann L,Joliyet Y, Hausman J F, Dizengremel P, Renaut J. 2007.A DIGE analysis of developing poplar leaves subjectedto ozone reveals major changes in carbon metabolism.Proteomics, 7, 1584-1599[9]Bradford M M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method forthe quantitation of microgram quantities of proteinutilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. AnalyticalBiochemistry, 72, 248-254[10]Bustamante C, Chemla Y R, Forde N R, Izhaky D. 2004.Mechanical processes in biochemistry. Annual Review ofBiochemistry, 73, 705-748[11]Chen H B, Huang H Q. 2011. Proteomic analysis of methylparathion-responsive proteins in Sparus latus liver. Fish& Shellfish Immunology, 30, 800-806[12]Chen X, Shang J, Chen D, Lei C, Zou Y, Zhai W, Liu G, XuJ, Ling Z, Cao G, et al. 2006. A B-lectin receptor kinasegene conferring rice blast resistance. The Plant Journal,46, 794-804[13]Colucci S J, Holmes G J. 2010. Downy mildew ofcucurbits. The Plant Health Instructor, doi: 10.1094/PHI-I-2010-0825-01Das A M 2003. Regulation of the mitochondrial ATPsynthasein health and disease. Molecular Genetics andMetabolism, 79, 71-82[14]Dong C J, Wang X L, Shang Q M. 2011. Salicylic acidregulates sugar metabolism that confers toleranceto salinity stress in cucumber seedlings. ScientiaHorticulturae, 129, 629-636[15]Dooki A D, Mayer-Posner F J, Askari H, Zaiee A, SalekdehG H. 2006. Proteomic responses of rice young paniclesto salinity. Proteomics, 6, 6498-6507[16]Du C X, Fan H F, Guo S R, Tezuka T, Li J. 2010. Proteomicanalysis of cucumber seedling roots subjected to saltstress. Phytochemistry, 71, 1450-1459[17]Duncan R, Hershey J W. 1984. Evaluation of isoelectricfocusing running conditions during two-dimensionalisoelect r ic focus ing/sodium dodecyl sul fatepolyacrylamidegel electrophoresis: variation of gelpatterns with changing conditions and optimizedisoelectric focusing conditions. Analytical Biochemistry,138, 144-155[18]Feng W J, Guo B J, Yao Y Y, Peng H R, Sun Q X, Ni ZF. 2012. Proteomic identification of rhythmic proteinsin maize seedling leaves. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 11, 1958-1967[19]Foyer C H, Halliwell B. 1976. The presence of glutathioneand glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: a proposedrole in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta, 133, 21-25[20]Frickel E M, Jemth P, Widersten M, Mannervik B. 2001.Yeast glyoxalase I is a monomeric enzyme with twoactive sites. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276,1845-1849[21]George J, Prasad S, Mahmood Z, Shukla Y. 2010. Studieson glyphosate-induced carcinogenicity in mouse skin:a proteomic approach. Journal of Proteomics, 73, 951-964[22]Giannakoula A, Moustakas M, Mylona P, Papadakis I,Yupsanis T. 2008. Aluminium tolerance in maize iscorrelated with increased levels of mineral nutrients,carbohydrates and proline and decreased levels of lipidperoxidation and Al accumulation. Journal of PlantPhysiology, 165, 385-396[23]Giannakoula A, Moustakas M, Syros T, Yupsanis T. 2010.Aluminium stress induces up-regulation of an efficientantioxidant system in the Al-tolerant maize line but notin the Al-sensitive line. Environmental and ExperimentalBotany, 67, 487-494[24]Glavinas H, Krajcsi P, Cserepes J, Sarkadi B. 2004. The roleof ABC transporters in drug resistance, metabolism andtoxicity. Current Drug Delivery, 1, 27-42[25]Gueta-Dahan Y, Yaniv Z, Zilinskas B A, Ben-Hayyim G.1997. Salt and oxidative stress: similar and specificresponses and their relation to salt tolerance in Citrus.Planta, 203, 460-469[26]Gygi S P, Rochon Y, Franza B R, Aebersold R. 1999.Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance inyeast. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 19, 1720-1730[27]Haqq C M, King C Y, Ukiyama E. 1995. Molecular basisof mammalian sexual determination: activation ofMüllerian inhibiting substance gene expression by SRY.Science, 5190, 1494-1500[28]Heath R L, Packer L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in isolatedchloroplasts I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acidperoxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics,125, 189-198[29]Hirokawa N, Tekamura R. 2003. Biochemical and molecularcharacterization of diseases linked to motor proteins.Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 28, 558-565[30]Hurkman W J, Tanaka C K. 1986. Solubilization of plantmembrane proteins for analysis by two-dimensional gelelectrophoresis. Plant Physiology, 81, 802-806[31]Khan A A, Mcneilly T, Collins C. 2000. Accumulation ofamino acids, proline, and carbohydrates in response toaluminum and manganese stress in maize. Journal ofPlant Nutrition, 23, 1303-1314[32]Kim Y S, Lee J H, Yoon G M, Cho H S, Park S W, Suh MC, Choi D, Ha H J, Liu J R, Pai H S. 2000. CHRK1, aChitinase-related receptor-like kinase in tobacco. PlantPhysiology, 123, 905-916[33]Korithoski B, Le´vesque C M, Cvitkovitch D G. 2007.Involvementof the detoxifying enzyme lactoylglutathionelyase in Streptococcus mutans aciduricity.Journal of Bacteriology, 21, 7586-7592[34]Laemmli U K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins duringthe assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature,227, 680-685[35]Lai E M, Nair U, Phadke N D, Maddock J R. 2004.Proteomic screening and identification of differentiallydistributed membrane proteins in Escherichia coli.Molecular Microbiology, 52, 1029-1044[36]Lange B M, Ghassemian M. 2005. Comprehensivepost-genomic data analysis approaches integratingbiochemical pathway maps. Phytochemistry, 66, 413-451[37]Lee C L, Hsiao H H, Lin C W, Wu S P, Huang S Y, WuC Y, Wang A H, Khoo K H. 2003. Strategic shotgunproteomics approach for efficient construction of anexpression map of targeted protein families in hepatomacell lines. Proteomics, 3, 2472-2486[38]Li Y Z, Fan X W, Liao J X. 2012. Foci of future studieson abiotic stress tolerance of maize in the era of postgenomics.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11, 1236-1244[39]Liang Y, Chen Q, Liu Q, Zhang W, Ding R. 2003.Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzymeactivity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of saltstressedbarley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of PlantPhysiology, 10, 1157-1164[40]Lin Y Z, Chen H Y, Kao R, Chang S P, Chang S J, Lai EM. 2008. Proteomic analysis of rice defense responseinduced by probenazole. Phytochemistry, 69, 715-728[41]Liu F F, Qin Z W, Zhou X Y. 2010. Screening germplasmresources of cucumber plant with low pesticide residuecontent. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University,41, 32-36[42]Ma B H, Qin Z W, Tan X Z. 2010. Determinate ofpropamocarb pesticide residue in cucumber fruits usinggas chromatography. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables,20, 51-53[43]Mishra Y, Chaurasia N, Rai L C. 2009. Heat pretreatmentalleviates UV-B toxicity in the cyanobacteriumAnabaena doliolum: a proteomic analysis of crosstolerance. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 85, 824-833[44]Moffett P, Farnham G, Peart J, David C. 2002. Interactionbetween domains of a plant NBS-LRR protein in diseaseresistance-related cell death. The EMBO Journal, 21,4511-4519[45]Osguthorpe D J. 2000. Ab initio protein folding. CurrentOpinion in Structural Biology, 10, 146-152[46]Park P B. 2002. Complete cDNA sequence encoding 20Sproteasome alpha 5 subunit PAE from soybean. DNASequencing, 4, 237-239[47]Pimentel D. 2009. Pesticides and pest control. In: PeshinR, Dhawan A K, eds., Integrated Pest Management:I n n o v a t i o n - D e v e l o p m e n t P r o c e s s . S p r ingerScience+Business Media B.V., USA.Riou C, Herv C, Pacquit V, Dabos P, Lescure B. 2002.Expression of an arabidopsis lectin kinase receptor gene,lecRK-a1, is induced during senescence, wounding andin response to oligogalacturonic acids. Plant Physiologyand Biochemistry, 40, 431-438[48]Ruiz J M, Blasco B, Rivero R M, Romero L. 2005. Nicotinefreeand salt tolerant tobacco plants obtained by graftingto salinity resistant rootstocks of tomato. PhysiologiaPlantarum, 124, 465-475[49]Sasabe M, Naito K, Suenaga H, Ikeda T, Toyoda K, InagakiY, Shiraishi T, Ichinose Y. 2007. Elicitin-responsivelectin-like receptor kinase genes in BY-2 cells[50]Mitochondrial DNA, 18, 152-159[51]Smalle J, Vierstra R. 2004. The ubiquitin 26S proteasomeproteolytic pathway. Annual Review of Plant Biology,55, 555-590[52]Sonenberg N, Dever T E. 2003. Eukaryotic translationfactors and regulators. Current Opinion in StructuralBiology, 13, 56-63[53]Srivastava A K, Bhargava P, Thapar R, Rai L C. 2008.Salinity-induced physiological and proteomic changesin Anabaena doliolum. Environmental and ExperimentalBotany, 64, 49-57[54]Staiger C J, Gibbon B C, Kovar D R, Zonia L E. 1998.Profilin and actindepolymerizing factor: modulators ofactin organization in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 2,275-281[55]Tesfaye M, Temple S J, Allan D L, Vance C P, Samac DA. 2001. Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis andconfers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiology, 127,1836-1844[56]Vannini C, Domingo G, Marsoni M, Bracale M, SestiliS, Ficcadenti N, Speranza A, Crinelli R, Carloni E,Scoccianti V. 2011. Proteomic changes and moleculareffects associated with Cr(III) and Cr(VI) treatments ongerminating kiwifruit pollen. Phytochemistry, 72, 1786-1795[57]Venema J, Tollervey D. 1999. Ribosome synthesis inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Annual Review of Genetics,33, 261-311[58]Wang J. 2010. Physiological and molecular mechanismsof brassinosteroids-regulated pesticide degradation intomato. PhD thesis, Zhejiang University, China. (in Chinese)[59]Xie Z, Fan B, Chen C, Chen Z. 2001. An important role ofan inducible RNA-dependent RNA polymerase in plantantiviral defense. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 6516-6521[60]Xu C J, Li Y T, Kong A T. 2005. Induction of phase I, II andIII drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics. Archivesof Pharmacal Research, 28, 249-268[61]Yan S P, Tang Z C, Su W A. 2005. Proteomic analysis ofsalt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics, 5,235-244[62]Yan S P, Zhang Q Y, Tang Z C, Su W A, Sun W N. 2006.Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insightsinto chilling stress responses in rice. Molecular &Cellular Proteomics, 5, 484-496[63]Yu D, Fan B, MacFarlane S A, Chen Z. 2003. Analysisof the involvement of an inducible Arabidopsis RNAdependentRNA polymerase in antiviral defense.Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 16, 206-216[64]Yu W, Zhang R, Li R, Guo S. 2007. Isolation andcharacterization of glyphosateregulated genes in soybeanseedlings. Plant Science, 172, 497-504[65]Zorb C, Schmitt S, Neeb A, Karl S, Linder M, SchubertS. 2004. The biochemical reaction of maize (Zeamays L.) to salt stress is characterized by a mitigationof symptoms and not by a specific adaptation. PlantScience, 167, 91-100 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
