|
|
|
QTLs for Waterlogging Tolerance at Germination and Seedling Stages in Population of Recombinant Inbred Lines Derived from a Cross Between Synthetic and Cultivated Wheat Genotypes |
YU Ma, MAO Shuang-lin, CHEN Guo-yue, LIU Ya-xi, LI Wei, WEI Yu-ming, LIU Chun-ji , ZHENG You-liang |
1.Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
2.Agronomy College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
3.CSIRO Plant Industry, St Lucia QLD 4067, Australia |
|
|
摘要 Waterlogging is a widespread limiting factor for wheat production throughout the world. To identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth, survival rate (SR), germination rate index (GRI), leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI), root length index (RLI), plant height index (PHI), root dry weight index (RDWI), shoot dry weight index (SDWI), and total dry weight index (DWI) were assessed using the International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) population W7984/Opata85. Significant and positive correlations were detected for all traits in this population except RLI. A total of 32 QTLs were associated with waterlogging tolerance on all chromosomes except 3A, 3D, 4B, 5A, 5D, 6A, and 6D. Some of the QTLs explained large proportions of the phenotypic variance. One of these is the QTL for GRI on 7A, which explained 23.92% of the phenotypic variation. Of them, 22 alleles from the synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 contributed positively. These results suggested that synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 is an important genetic resource for waterlogging tolerance in wheat. These alleles conferring waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth in wheat could be utilized in wheat breeding for improving waterlogging tolerance.
Abstract Waterlogging is a widespread limiting factor for wheat production throughout the world. To identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth, survival rate (SR), germination rate index (GRI), leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI), root length index (RLI), plant height index (PHI), root dry weight index (RDWI), shoot dry weight index (SDWI), and total dry weight index (DWI) were assessed using the International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) population W7984/Opata85. Significant and positive correlations were detected for all traits in this population except RLI. A total of 32 QTLs were associated with waterlogging tolerance on all chromosomes except 3A, 3D, 4B, 5A, 5D, 6A, and 6D. Some of the QTLs explained large proportions of the phenotypic variance. One of these is the QTL for GRI on 7A, which explained 23.92% of the phenotypic variation. Of them, 22 alleles from the synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 contributed positively. These results suggested that synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 is an important genetic resource for waterlogging tolerance in wheat. These alleles conferring waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth in wheat could be utilized in wheat breeding for improving waterlogging tolerance.
|
Received: 05 December 2012
Accepted:
|
Fund: This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB100100), the National High- Tech R&D Program of China (2011AA100103) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31230053 and 31171556). |
Corresponding Authors:
ZHENG You-liang, Tel: +86-28-86290909, Fax: +86-28-82650350, E-mail: ylzheng@sicau.edu.cn
E-mail: ylzheng@sicau.edu.cn
|
About author: ZHENG You-liang, Tel: +86-28-86290909, Fax: +86-28-82650350, E-mail: ylzheng@sicau.edu.cn |
Cite this article:
YU Ma, MAO Shuang-lin, CHEN Guo-yue, LIU Ya-xi, LI Wei, WEI Yu-ming, LIU Chun-ji , ZHENG You-liang.
2014.
QTLs for Waterlogging Tolerance at Germination and Seedling Stages in Population of Recombinant Inbred Lines Derived from a Cross Between Synthetic and Cultivated Wheat Genotypes. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(1): 31-39.
|
Ahn S, Anderson J A, Sorrells M E, Tanksley S D. 1993.Homoeologous relationships of rice, wheat and maize chromosomes. Molecular and General Genetics, 241,483-490Armstrong W, Brändle R, Jackson M B. 1994. Mechanismsof flood tolerance in plants. Acta Botanica Neerlandica,43, 307-358Boru G, van G M, Kronstad W E, Boersma L. 2001.Expression and inheritance of waterlogging tolerance stress in wheat. Euphytica, 117, 91-98Burgos M S, Messmer M M, Stamp P, Chmid J. 2001.Flooding tolerance of spelt (Triticum spelta L.) comparedto wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) - a physiological andgenetic approach. Euphytica, 122, 287-295Cao Y, Cai S B, Wu Z S, Zhu W, Fang X W, Xiong E H. 1995. Studies on genetic features of waterloggingtolerance in wheat. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 11,11-15 (in Chinese)Collaku A, Harrison S A. 2005. Heritability of waterloggingtolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 45, 722-727Colmer T D, Flowers T J, Munns R. 2006. Use of wildrelatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 57, 1059-1078Colmer T D, Voesenek L A C J. 2009. Flooding tolerance:suites of plant traits in variable environments. FunctionalPlant Biology, 36, 665-681Cui F, Li J, Ding A M, Zhao C H, Wang L, Wang X Q, Li SS, Bao Y G, Li X F, Feng D S, et al. 2011. ConditionalQTL mapping for plant height with respect to the lengthof the spike and internode in two mapping populationsof wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122, 1517-1536van Deynze A E, Dubcovsky J, Gill K S, Nelson J C, Sorrells M E, Dvofak J, Gill B S, Lagudah E S,McCouch S R, Appels R. 1995. Molecular-genetic mapsfor group 1 chromosomes of Triticeae species and theirrelation to chromosomes in rice and oat. Genome, 38,45-59Evans D E. 2003. Aerenchyma formation. New Phytologist,161, 35-49Hossain A, Uddin S N. 2011. Mechanisms of waterloggingtolerance in wheat: Morphological and metabolic adaptations under hypoxia or anoxia. Australian Journalof Crop Science, 5, 1094-1101Huang B, Johnson J W, Nesmith S, Bridges D C. 1994a.Growth, physiological and anatomical responses of twowheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply.Journal of Experimental Botany, 45, 193-202Huang B, Johnson J W, Nesmith D S, Bridges D C. 1994b.Root and shoot growth of wheat genotypes in responseto hypoxia and subsequent resumption of aeration. CropScience, 34, 1538-1544Jackson M B, Armstrong W. 1999. Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation inrelation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biology,1, 274-287Jackson M B, Drew M C. 1984. Effects of flooding ongrowth and metabolism of herbaceous plants. In: Kozlowski T T, ed., Flooding and Plant Growth.Academic Press, New York. pp. 47-128Jayatilake D V, Bai G H, Dong Y H. 2011. A novel quantitative trait locus for Fusarium head blight resistance in chromosome 7A of wheat. Theoretical andApplied Genetics, 122, 1189-1198King I P, Forster B P, Law C C, Cant K A, Orford S E,Gorham J, Reader S, Miller T E. 1997. Introgression ofsalt-tolerance genes from Thinopyrum bessarabicum intowheat. New Phytologist, 137, 75-81Lage J, Skovmand B, Andersen S B. 2003. Expression andsuppression of resistance to greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) in synthetic hexaploid wheats derived from Triticum dicoccum × Aegilops tauschii crosses. Journalof Economic Entomology, 96, 202-206 Li H B, Vaillancourt R, Mendham N J, Zhou M X. 2008.Comparative mapping of quantitative trait loci associatedwith waterlogging tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.). BMC Genomics, 9, 401.Ma H X, Bai G H, Zhang X, Lu W Z. 2006. Main effects,epistasis, and environmental interactions of quantitativetrait loci for Fusarium head blight resistance in a recombinant inbred population. Phytopathology, 96,534-541Ma L Q, Zhou E F, Huo N X, Zhou R H, Wang G Y, Jia J Z.2007. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in a recombinantinbred population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Euphytica, 153, 109-117Martin N, Bouck A, Arnold M. 2006. Detecting adaptive trait introgression between Iris fulva and I. brevicaulisin highly selective field conditions. Genetics, 172, 2481-2489McDonald M P, Galwey N W, Ellneskog-Staam P, ColmerT D. 2001. Evaluation of Lophopyrum elongatum asa source of genetic diversity to increase waterloggingtolerance of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum). NewPhytologist, 151, 369-380Mujeeb-Kazi A, RosasV, Roldan S. 1996. Conservationof the genetic variation of Triticum tauschii (Coss.)Schmalh. (Aegilops squarrosa auct. Non L.) insynthetic hexaploid wheats (T. turgidum L. × T. tauschii;2n=6x=42, AABBDD) and its potential utilizationfor wheat improvement. Genetic Resources and CropEvolution, 43, 129-134Munns R, James R A, Islam A K M R, Colmer T D. 2011.Hordeum marinum-wheat amphiploids maintain higher leaf K+:Na+ and suffer less leaf injury than wheat parentsin saline conditions. Plant Soil, 348, 365-377Nandi S, Subudhi P K, Senadhira D, Manigbas N L,SenMandi S, Huang N. 1997. Mapping QTL for submergence tolerance in rice by AFLP analysis andselective genotyping. Molecular and General Genetics,255, 1-8Pang J Y, Zhou M X, Mendham N, Shabala S. 2004. Growthand physiological responses of six barley genotypes to waterlogging and subsequent recovery. AustralianJournal of Agricultural Research, 55, 895-906Parelle J, Dreyer E, Brendel O. 2010. Genetic variability anddeterminism of adaptation of plants to soil waterlogging.In: Mancuso S, Shabala S, eds., Waterlogging Signallingand Tolerance in Plants. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag,Germany. pp. 241-265Pearson A, Cogan N O I, Baillie B C, Hand M L,Bandaranayake C K, Erb S, Wang J P, Kearney G A,Gendall A R, Smith K F, et al. 2011. Identification of QTL for morphological traits influencing waterloggingtolerance in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.).Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122, 609-622Poysa V W. 1984. The genetic control of low temperature,iceencasement, and flooding tolerances by chromosomes5A, 5B, and 5D in wheat. Cereal ResearchCommunications, 12, 135-141Qiu F Z, Zheng Y L, Zhang Z L, Xu S Z. 2007. Mappingof QTL associated with waterlogging tolerance duringthe seedling stage in maize. Annals of Botany, 99, 1067-1081Samad A, Meisner C A, Saifuzzaman M, van Ginkel M.2001. Waterlogging tolerance. In: Reynolds M P,Ortiz-Monasterio J I, McNab A, eds., Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico. pp. 136-144Settler T L, Waters I. 2003. Reviews of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance inwheat, barley and oats. Plant Soil, 253, 1-34Song Q J, Shi J R, Singh S, Fickus E W, Costa J M, LewisJ, Gill B S, Ward R, Cregan P B. 2005. Development and mapping of microsatellite (SSR) markers in wheat Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 110, 550-560Taeb M, Koebner R M D, Forster B P. 1993. Genetic variation for waterlogging tolerance in the Triticeae and the chromosomal location of genes conferringwaterlogging tolerance in Thinopyrum elongatum.Genome, 36, 825-830Tang Q Y, Feng M G. 2007. DPS Data Processing System:Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis, and DataMining. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)Thomson C J, Colmer T D, Watkin E L J, GreenwayH. 1992. Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv.Gamenya and Kite) and triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir)to waterlogging. New Phytologist, 120, 335-344Toojinda T, Siangliw M, Tragoonrung S, Vanavichit A.2003. Molecular genetics of submergence tolerance inrice: QTL analysis of key traits. Annals of Botany, 91,243-253.Trethowan R M, Mujeeb-Kazi A. 2008. Novel germplasm resources for improving environmental stress tolerance of hexaploid wheat. Crop Science, 48, 1255-1265Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. 2007. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, NorthCarolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Watkin E L J, Thomson C J, Greenway H. 1998. Root development in two wheat cultivars and one triticale cultivar grown in stagnant agar and aerated nutrient solution. Annals of Botany, 81, 349-354Yang W Y, Liu D C, Li J, Zhang L Q, Wei H T, Hu X R,Zheng Y L, He Z H, Zou Y C. 2009. Synthetic hexaploidwheat and its utilization for wheat genetic improvementin China. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 36, 539-546Zhou M X, Li H B, Mendham N J. 2007. Combining abilityof waterlogging tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.). Crop Science, 47, 278-284. |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|