|
|
|
|
|
| Leaf Gas Exchange, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, and Fruit Yield in Hot Pepper (Capsicum anmuum L.) Grown Under Different Shade and Soil Moisture During the Fruit Growth Stage |
| ZHUJuan-juan, LIANGYin-li, WUXing, HAOWang-lin |
1.College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
2.Extension Center of Agricultural Technology, Fengxian Agricultural Bureau, Fengxian 721700, P.R.China
3.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, the Chinese Academy of Sciences/Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 Relative leaf chlorophyll (Chl.) content, leaf gas exchange, Chl. fluorescence, plant biological biomass, and fruit yield were evaluated in growing hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) during the fruit-growing stages in hot summer under three shade levels (un-shade, 30% shade, and 70% shade) and four soil water contents (SWC) of 40-55%, 55-70%, 70-85%, and 85- 100% of field moisture capacity (FMC). Hot pepper crops were more affected by light irradiance than by soil moisture and by their interaction during the whole observed periods. Hot pepper attained greatest relative leaf Chl. content (expressed as SPAD value) and photosynthetic activity when cultivated with 30% shade, resulting in the highest plant biological biomass and fruit yield. Although 70% shade improved leaf photosynthetic efficiency (expressed as Fv/Fm or Fv´/Fm´), crops obtained the lowest photosynthetic rate, photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), and non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ). This showed that light irradiance was insufficiency in S70% (70% shade) treatment. The leaf net photosynthetic rates (PN), Fv/Fm, and fruit yield increased gradually as SWC levels increased from 40-55% to 70- 85% FMC, but decreased as SWC was higher than 70-85% FMC. The water consumption increased progressively with SWC levels, but water-use efficiency (WUE) was the highest when soil moisture was 55-70% FMC. Interaction of shade and soil moisture had significant effects on PN and Fv/Fm, but not on other parameters. Under drought stress (40-55% and 55-70% FMC), 30% shade could relieve the droughty damage of crops and improve photosynthetic capacity and WUE, but 70% shade could not, oppositely, aggravate the damage. The positive correlation (r2 =0.72) between leaf PN and fruit yield was existent. This indicated that improvement of leaf photosynthesis would increase potentially marketable yield in hot pepper crops during the full fruit-growing stages. For agricultural purposes, approximately S30% (30% shade) with 70- 85% FMC is suggested to cultivate hot pepper during the fruit growth stage in hot summer months.
Abstract Relative leaf chlorophyll (Chl.) content, leaf gas exchange, Chl. fluorescence, plant biological biomass, and fruit yield were evaluated in growing hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) during the fruit-growing stages in hot summer under three shade levels (un-shade, 30% shade, and 70% shade) and four soil water contents (SWC) of 40-55%, 55-70%, 70-85%, and 85- 100% of field moisture capacity (FMC). Hot pepper crops were more affected by light irradiance than by soil moisture and by their interaction during the whole observed periods. Hot pepper attained greatest relative leaf Chl. content (expressed as SPAD value) and photosynthetic activity when cultivated with 30% shade, resulting in the highest plant biological biomass and fruit yield. Although 70% shade improved leaf photosynthetic efficiency (expressed as Fv/Fm or Fv´/Fm´), crops obtained the lowest photosynthetic rate, photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), and non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ). This showed that light irradiance was insufficiency in S70% (70% shade) treatment. The leaf net photosynthetic rates (PN), Fv/Fm, and fruit yield increased gradually as SWC levels increased from 40-55% to 70- 85% FMC, but decreased as SWC was higher than 70-85% FMC. The water consumption increased progressively with SWC levels, but water-use efficiency (WUE) was the highest when soil moisture was 55-70% FMC. Interaction of shade and soil moisture had significant effects on PN and Fv/Fm, but not on other parameters. Under drought stress (40-55% and 55-70% FMC), 30% shade could relieve the droughty damage of crops and improve photosynthetic capacity and WUE, but 70% shade could not, oppositely, aggravate the damage. The positive correlation (r2 =0.72) between leaf PN and fruit yield was existent. This indicated that improvement of leaf photosynthesis would increase potentially marketable yield in hot pepper crops during the full fruit-growing stages. For agricultural purposes, approximately S30% (30% shade) with 70- 85% FMC is suggested to cultivate hot pepper during the fruit growth stage in hot summer months.
|
|
Received: 26 November 2010
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was financially supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program-Climatic Change, China (XDA05050504), and the Key Technology R&D Program of China during the 11th Five-Years Plan period (2011BAD31B05-04). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
LIANG Yin-li, Tel: +86-29-87012227, Fax: +86-29-87012210, E-mail: liangyl@ms.
iswc.ac.cn
E-mail: liangyl@ms.
|
| About author: ZHU Juan-juan, Mobile: 18691724350, E-mail: zjj0954@163.com; |
Cite this article:
ZHUJuan-juan , LIANGYin-li , WUXing , HAOWang-lin .
2012.
Leaf Gas Exchange, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, and Fruit Yield in Hot Pepper (Capsicum anmuum L.) Grown Under Different Shade and Soil Moisture During the Fruit Growth Stage. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(6): 927-937.
|
| [1]Araus J L,Amaro T, Voltas J, Nakkoul H, Nachit M M. 1998. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection criterion for grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research, 55, 209-223. [2]Ashraf M. 2001. Relationships between growth and gas exchange characteristics in some salt-tolerant amphidiploid Brassica species in relation to their diploid parents. Environmental and Experiment Botany, 45, 155-163. [3]Ashraf M, Bashir A. 2003. Relationship of photosynthetic capacity at the vegetative stage and during grain development with grain yield of two hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars differing. European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 277-287. [4]Bertamini M, Muthuchelian K, Nedunchezhian N. 2006. Shade effect alters leaf pigments and photosynthetic responses in Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) grown under field conditions. Photosynthetica, 2, 227-234. [5]Björkman O, Powles S B. 1984. Inhibition of photosynthetic reactions under water stress: interaction with light level. Planta, 161, 490-504. [6]Cafer G, Iran E, Akincik K, Ucan S, Akinci S G. 2006. Response of red hot pepper plant (Capsicum annuum L.) to the deficit irrigation. Akdeniz Uuniversiteisi Zirrat Fakultesi Dergisi, 19, 131-138. [7]Campbell D, Hurry V, Clarke A, Gustafsson P, Õquist G. 1998. Chlorophyl l f luorescence analysis of cyanobacterial photosynthesis and acclimation. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 62, 667-683. [8]Chongo G, Mcvetty P. 2001. Relationship of physiological characters to yield parameters in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 81, 1-6. [9]Climent J M, Alonso I, Pardos J A, Gil L. 2006. Developmental constraints limit the response of Canary Island pine seedling to combined shade and drought. Forest Ecology and Management, 231, 164-168. [10]Cornic G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreased stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 5, 187-188. [11]Cornic G, Briantais J M. 1991. Partitioning of photosynthetic electron flow between CO2 and O2 reduction in a C3 leaf (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) at different CO2 concentrations and during drought stress. Planta, 183, 178-184. [12]Dai Y J, Shen Z G, Liu Y, Wang L L, Hannawayc D, Lu H F. 2009. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 65, 177-182. [13]Hansen P. 1969. Importance of leaf photosynthetic activity during reproductive period. Physiology Plant, 22, 186-190. [14]Hedeker D, Gibbons R D. 2006. Longitudinal Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. pp. 81-99. [15]Hegde D M. 1987. Growth analysis of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in relation to soil moisture and nitrogen fertilization. Science Horticulturae, 33, 179-187. [16]Huo H X, Niu WQ, WangY K, Wang J Z. 2008. Influence of irrigation on volume to hot pepper growth. Yellow River, 30, 55-57. (in Chinese) [17]Ibaraki Y, Murakami J. 2007. Distribution of chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm within individual plants under various stress conditions. Acta Horticulturae, 761, 255-258. [18]Israeli Y, Plautb Z, Schwartz A. 1995. Effect of shade on banana morphology, growth and production. Scientia Horticulturae, 62, 45-56. [19]Jaimez R E, Rada F. 2006. Flowering and fruit production dynamics of sweet pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq) under different shade conditions in a humid tropical region. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 27, 97-108. [20]Jason J G, Thomas G R, Pharr D M. 2004. Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and carbohydrate content of illicium taxa grown under varied irradiance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 129, 46-53. [21]Kang S X, Zhang L, Hu X T, Li Z J, Jerie P. 2001. An improved water use efficiency for hot pepper grown under controlled alternate drip irrigation on partial roots. Scientia Horticulturae, 89, 257-267. [22]Klaus H, Oscar K. 2008. Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, UAS. pp. 241-278. [23]Kornyeyev D, Holaday S, Logan B. 2003. Predicting the extent of photosystem II photoinactivation using chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters measured during illumination. Plant Cell Physiology, 44, 1064-1070. [24]Lawlor D. 1995. Photosynthesis, productivity, and environment. Journal of Experiment Botany, 46, 1449-1461. [25]Liang YL,Wu X, Zhu J J, ZhouM J, Peng Q. 2011. Response of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to mulching practices under planted greenhouse condition. Agricultural Water Management, 99, 111-120. [26]Little T M, Hills F J. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation: Design and Analysis. Wiley, New York, USA. pp. 153-187. [27]Long S P, Zhu X G, Naidu S L, Ort D R. 2006. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environment, 29, 315-330. [28]Mao L Z, Lu H F, Wang Q, Cai M M. 2007. Comparative photosynthesis characteristics of calycanthus chinensis and chimonanthus praecox. Photosynthetica, 45, 601-605. [29]Maxwell K, Johnson G N. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescencea practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 659-668. [30]Moller M, Tanny J , Cohen S, Tei t e l M. 2003. Micrometeorological measurements in a screenhouse. Acta Horticulturae, 614, 445-451. [31]Navarro JM, Flores P, Garrido C,Martinez V. 2006. Changes in the contents of antioxidant compounds in pepper fruits at different ripening stages, as affected by salinity. Food Chemistry, 96, 66-73. [32]ren E, Sjostrom M. 1990. Estimation of the effect of photoinhibition on the carbon gain in leaves of a willow canopy. Planta, 181, 560-567. [33]Pessarakli M. 1990. Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Mrcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA. pp. 483-497. [34]SAS institute. 2003. SAS for Windows. V.9.1. SAS Inst., Cary, NC. Shao G C, Zhang Z Y, Liu N, Yu S E, Xing W G. 2008. Comparative effects of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial rootzone drying (PRD) on soil water distribution, water use, growth and yield in greenhouse grown hot pepper. Scientia Horticulture, 119, 11-16. [35]Showemimo F A, Olarewaju J D. 2007. Drought tolerance indices in sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 1, 29-33. [36]Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Castillo-Hernandez J, Caballero-Nieto J. 2000. Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 80, 61-69. [37]Souza R P, Machado E C, Silva J A B, Lag鬭 A M M A, Silveira A G. 2004. Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) during water stress and recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 51, 45-56. [38]Starman T, Lombardini L. 2006. Growth, gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence of four ornamental herbaceous perennial during water deficit conditions. Horticultural Science, 131, 469-475. [39]Thomas D S, Turner D W. 2001. Banana (Musa sp.) leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in response to soil drought, shading and lamina folding. Scientia Horticulturae, 90, 93-108. [40]Wang H, Wang F L, Wang G, Majourhat K. 2007. The responses of photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content of nectarine (Prunus persica var. Nectarina Maxim) to greenhouse and field grown conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 112, 66-72. [41]Weiss E A. 2002. Spice Crops: World Production and Trade. CABI Publishing, CAB Internat ional, Wallingford, UK. pp. 16-17. [42]Wittmann C, Aschan G, Pfanz H. 2001. Leaf and twig photosynthesis of young been (Fagus sylvstica) and aspen (Populus tremula) trees grown under different light regime. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2, 145-154. [43]Zieslin N, Mor Y. 1990. Light on roses: a review. Scientia Horticulturae, 43, 1-14. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
