干旱胁迫对甘蔗4个生理指标遗传变异的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.01.003

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Understanding of the genetic variations in response to drought conditions of four physiological indexes, namely stomatal conductance (Gs), original light energy transformation efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), leaf elongation (LE) and leaf relative water content (RWC) could help their adaption to the current breeding program.【Method】The genetic variation (s_g²), broad sense heritability (h_b²) under rainfed and irrigated conditions for four physiological indexes, namely Gs, Fv/Fm, LE and RWC were measured for 13, 18, 15 and 10 times, respectively, from two sets of field trials in 22 and 18 genotypes which were consistently conducted at two locations in Kaiyuan and Yuanjiang counties of Yunnan province in the crop growing periods of 2013 and 2014. In the trials, rainfed and irrigated treatments were set as the main plot, and genotype was used as the sub-plot. The s_g² and error variation (s_e²) for each index at each measurement was determined using software GenStat, and h_b² was calculated. Paired t tests for the differences of s_g² and h_b² between drought and irrigated treatments were processed using software SAS9.1.【Result】The mean differences between drought and irrigated treatments were all significant (P＜0.01) in 13, 18, 15 and 10 measurements of Gs Fv/Fm, LE and RWC, respectively. Under drought and irrigated treatments, the differences in Gs among the genotypes was significant in 10 and 11 out of 13 measurements with the ranges of h_b² at 0.19-0.68 and 0.19-0.82, and grand means of 0.49 and 0.53, respectively, overall significantly higher s_g² and h_b²were found under the irrigated treatment. The differences in Fv/Fm, among the genotypes were significant in 17 and 16 out of 18 measurements with the ranges of h_b² at 0.26-0.83 and 0.16-0.85, and grand means of 0.64 and 0.58, respectively, overall higher s_g² and h_b² were found under the drought treatment. The differences in LE among the genotypes were significant in 14 and 10 out of 15 measurements with the ranges of h_b² at 0.09-0.89 and 0.09-0.81, and grand means of 0.58 and 0.50, respectively, overall higher s_g² and h_b² were found under the drought treatment. The differences in RWC among the genotypes were significant in 8 and 6 out of 10 measurements with the ranges of h_b² at 0.10-0.76 and 0.16-0.77, and grand means of 0.57 and 0.47, respectively, overall higher s_g² and h_b² were found under the drought treatment. 【Conclusion】The s_g² and h_b² of Gs, Fv/Fm, LE and RWC were impacted by water stress, in general, much higher s_g² and h_b² of Gs could be obtained under irrigated conditions and that of Fv/Fm, LE and RWC under drought conditions. However, higher h_b² could be obtained under irrigated conditions for all the four physiological indexes.

Key words: sugarcane, water stress, physiological index, genetic variation

ZHAO PeiFang, ZHAO Jun, LIU JiaYong, ZAN FengGang, XIA HongMing, P.A. Jackson, J. Basnayake, N.G. Inman-Bamber, YANG Kun, ZHAO LiPing, QIN Wei, CHEN XueKuan, ZHAO XingDong, FAN YuanHong. Genetic Variation of Four Physiological Indexes as Impacted by Water Stress in Sugarcane[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(1): 28-37.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.01.003

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2017/V50/I1/28

References

[1] 张风娟, 李健, 杜成忠, 杨丽涛, 李杨瑞, 邢永秀. 不同甘蔗品种叶片气孔对水分胁迫的响应. 广西植物, 2014(6): 821-827.

Zhang F J, Li J, Du C Z, Yang L T, Li Y R, Xing Y X. Stomatal response to water stress in leaves of different sugarcane cultivars. Guihaia, 2014(6): 821-827. (in Chinese)

[2] 吴才文, 范源洪, 陈学宽, 刘家勇, 赵俊, 赵培方, 夏红明, 杨昆. 云南抗旱甘蔗品种的选育及效果. 中国糖料, 2012(4): 37-39.

Wu C W, Fan Y H, Chen X K, Liu J Y, Zhao J, Zhao P F, Xia H M, Yang K. Breeding of drought-resistant sugarcane varieties in Yunnan. Sugar crops of China, 2012(4): 37-39. (in Chinese)

[3] Inman-Bamber N G, Smith D M. Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Research, 2005, 92: 185-202.

[4] Graça J P D, Rodrigues F A, Farias J R B, de Oliveira M C N, Zingaretti C B H, Sonia M Z. Physiological parameters in sugarcane cultivars submitted to water deficit. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2010, 22(3): 187-197.

[5] Zhao D, Glaz B, Jack C. Sugarcane response to water-deficit stress during early growth on organic and sand soils. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 2010, 5(3): 403-414.

[6] 罗俊, 张木清, 林彦铨, 张华, 陈如凯. 甘蔗苗期叶绿素荧光参数与抗旱性关系研究. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(11): 1718-1721.

Luo J, Zhang M Q, Lin Y Q, Zhang H, Chen R K. Studies on the relationship of chlorophyll fluorescence characters and drought tolerance in seedling of sugarcane under water stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004, 37(11): 1718-1721. (in Chinese)

[7] Silva de A M, John L J, Silva J A G D, Sharma V. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2007, 19(3): 193-201.

[8] Begum M K, Alam M R, Islam M S, Arefin M S. Effect of water stress on physiological characters and juice quality of sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 2012, 14(2): 161-167.

[9] Basnayake J, Jackson P A, Inman-Bamber N G, Lakshmanan P. Sugarcane for water-limited environments. Genetic variation in cane yield and sugar content in response to water stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(16): 6023-6033.

[10] Silva M d A, Jifon J L, Silva J A G d, Dos Santos C M, Sharma V. Relationships between physiological traits and productivity of sugarcane in response to water deficit. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2012, 152(1): 104-118.

[11] 金伟, 杨丽涛, 英潘, 杨建波, 罗超有, 李杨瑞. 不同甘蔗品种对干旱和复水的生态生理响应. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(12): 1945-1951.

Jin W, Yang L T, Ying P, Yang J B, Luo C Y, Li Y R. Eco-physiological responses of different sugarcane varieties to drought and re-watering. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2012, 43(12): 1945-1951. (in Chinese)

[12] 潘方胤, 杨俊贤, 吴文龙, 刘福业, 吴建涛, 彭冬永, 陈勇生. 甘蔗育种中抗旱品系筛选及简易鉴定. 广东农业科学, 2012(16): 10-12.

Pan F Y, Yang J X, Wu W L, Liu F Y, Wu J T, Peng D Y, Chen Y S. Breeding and simple identification of drought-tolerant sugarcane line. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012(16): 10-12. (in Chinese)

[13] 陈义强, 邓祖湖, 郭春芳, 陈如凯, 张木清. 甘蔗常用亲本及其衍生品种的抗旱性评价. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(6): 1108-1117.

Chen Y Q, Deng Z H, Guo C F, Chen R K, Zhang M Q. Drought resistant evaluations of commonly used parents and their derived varieties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(6): 1108-1117. (in Chinese)

[14] Silva M D A, Soares R A B, Landell M G D A, Campana M P. Agronomic performance of sugarcane families in response to water stress. Bragantia, 2008, 67(3): 655-661.

[15] Tardieu F. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science, 2003, 8(1): 9-14.

[16] Basnayake J, Jackson P A, Inman-Bamber N G, Lakshmanan P. Sugarcane for water-limited environments. Variation in stomatal conductance and its genetic correlation with crop productivity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(13): 3945-3958.

[17] Sliva M A, Silva J A G, Da Jifon J L, Sharma V. Use of physiological parameters to detect differences in drought tolerance among sugarcane genotypes. Proceedings of International Society of Sugar Cane Technologist, 2007, 26: 541-547.

[18] Inman-Bamber N G. Sugarcane water stress criteria for irrigation and drying off. Field Crops Research, 2004, 89(1): 107-122.

[19] Jackson P A, McRae T A. Gains from selection of broadly adapted and specifically adapted sugarcane families. Field Crops Research, 1998, 59(3): 151-162.

[20] Jackson P A, McRae T A. Selection of sugarcane clones in small plots: Effects of plot size and selection criteria. Crop Science, 2001, 41(2): 315-322.

[21] Stringer J K, Cullis B R, Thompson R. Joint modeling of spatial variability and within-row interplot competition to increase the efficiency of plant improvement. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2011, 16(2): 269-281.

[22] Zhao P F, Liu J Y, Yang K, Xia H M, Wu C W, Chen X K, Zhao J, Yang H C, Li J, Zan F G, Wu Z D, Yao L, Li F Q, Zhao L P. Registration of ‘YZ05-51’ sugarcane. Journal of Plant Registration, 2015, 9(2): 172-178.

[23] Sinclair T R. Is transpiration efficiency a viable plant trait in breeding for crop improvement? Functional Plant Biology, 2012, 39(5): 359-365.

[24] Condon A G, Richards R A, Rebetzke G J, Farquhar G D. Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55(407): 2447-2460.

[25] Fischer R A, Rees D, Sayre K D, Lu Z M, Condon A G, Saavedra A L. Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Science, 1998, 38(6): 1467-1475.

[26] Jiang G M, Sun J Z, Liu H Q, Qu C M, Wang K J, Guo R J, Bai K Z, Gao L M, Kuang T Y. Changes in the rate of photosynthesis accompanying the yield increase in wheat cultivars released in the past 50 years. Journal of Plant Research, 2003, 116(5): 347-354.

[27] Zheng T C, Zhang X K, Yin G H, Wang L N, Han Y L, Chen L, Huang F, Tang J W, Xia X C, He Z H. Genetic gains in grain yield, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance achieved in Henan Province of China between 1981 and 2008. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122(3): 225-233.

[28] Horie T, Matsuura S, Takai T, Kuwasaki K, Ohsumi A, Shiraiwa T. Genotypic difference in canopy diffusive conductance measured by a new remote-sensing method and its association with the difference in rice yield potential. Plant Cell and Environment, 2006, 29(4): 653-660.

[29] Prashar A, Yildiz J, McNicol J W, Bryan G J, Jones H G. Infra-red thermography for high throughput field phenotyping in solanum tuberosum. PloS one, 2013, 8: e658166.

[30] Luo J, Pan Y B, XU L P, Zhang Y Y, Zhang H, Chen R K, Que Y X. Photosynthetic and canopy characteristics of different varieties at the early elongation stage and their relationships with the cane yield in sugarcane. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(2014): 707095.

[31] Furbank R T, Tester M. Phenomics-technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science, 2011, 16(12): 635-644.

[32] Silva M D A, Jifon J L, Sharma V, Da Silva J A G, Caputo M M, Damaj M B, Guimaraes E R, Ferro M I T. Use of physiological parameters in screening drought tolerance in sugarcane genotypes. Sugar Tech, 2011, 13(3): 191-197.

Related Articles 15

[1]	ZHANG JianJun, DANG Yi, ZHAO Gang, WANG Lei, FAN TingLu, LI ShangZhong. Influences of Mulching Periods and Nitrogen Application Rates on Maize Yield as well as Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies in Loess Plateau of Eastern Gansu Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 479-490.
[2]	HUANG XunHe,WENG ZhuoXian,LI WeiNa,WANG Qing,HE DanLin,LUO Wei,ZHANG XiQuan,DU BingWang. Genetic Diversity of Indigenous Yellow-Feathered Chickens in Southern China Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA D-Loop Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4526-4538.
[3]	DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[4]	LI Hao,WEI BenHui,HUANG JinLing,LI ZhiGang,WANG LingQiang,LIANG XiaoYing,LI SuLi. Effects of Fenlong Cultivation on Root Cell Structure and Enzyme of Respiratory Metabolic of Sugarcane [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 522-532.
[5]	MENG Rui,LIU Ye,ZHAO Shuang,FANG WeiMin,JIANG JiaFu,CHEN SuMei,CHEN FaDi,GUAN ZhiYong. Effects of Rootstock and Scion Interaction on Salt Tolerance of Grafted Chrysanthemum Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 629-642.
[6]	ZHUANG XinBo,CHEN YinJi,ZHOU GuangHong. The Mechanism of Myofibrillar Protein Gel Functionality Influenced by Modified Sugarcane Dietary Fiber [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3320-3330.
[7]	OU HuiPing,ZHOU LiuQiang,HUANG JinSheng,ZHU XiaoHui,ZENG Yan,PENG JiaYu,XIE RuLin,TAN HongWei,LI ZhongNing,SHEN XiaoWei,LIU XiHui. Research on Phosphorus Application Rate Based on Sugarcane Yield and Phosphorus Balance in Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2818-2829.
[8]	WANG XuanXuan,LIU ChunYu,XIE BeiYu,ZHANG ShuShu,WANG DanYang,ZHU ZhenYuan. Extraction Technology, Preliminary Structure and α-glucosidase Inhibition of Polysaccharide with Alkaline-Extracted from Sugarcane Peel [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2653-2665.
[9]	ZHANG LinLin,ZHI Hui,TANG Sha,ZHANG RenLiang,ZHANG Wei,JIA GuanQing,DIAO XianMin. Characterizations of Transcriptional and Haplotypic Variations of SiTOC1 in Foxtail Millet [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2273-2286.
[10]	ZHOU YiFan,YANG LinSheng,MENG Bo,ZHAN Jian,DENG Yan. Analysis of Yield Gaps and Limiting Factors in China’s Main Sugarcane Production Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2377-2388.
[11]	ZHAO Juan,YIN YiZhen,WANG XiaoLu,MA ChunYing,YIN MeiQiang,WEN YinYuan,SONG XiE,DONG ShuQi,YANG XueFang,YUAN XiangYang. Physiological Response of Millet Callus with Different Herbicide-Resistance to Sethoxydim Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5): 917-928.
[12]	OU HuiPing,ZHOU LiuQiang,HUANG JinSheng,XIE RuLin,ZHU XiaoHui,PENG JiaYu,ZENG Yan,MO ZongBiao,TAN HongWei,YE ShengQin. Change of Phosphorus in Lateritic Red Soil and Its Effect on Sugarcane Yield and Phosphorus Loss in Runoff Under 11-Year Continuous Application of Excessive Phosphorus Fertilizer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4623-4633.
[13]	LI GuiRong,QUAN Ran,CHENG ShanShan,HOU XiaoJin,FAN XiuCai,HU HuiLing. The Influencing Factors of in-vitro Ovule Development in Seedless Grape and Its Physiological Changes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4646-4657.
[14]	QIN YanHong,WANG YongJiang,WANG Shuang,QIAO Qi,TIAN YuTing,ZHANG DeSheng,ZHANG ZhenChen. Complete Nucleotide Sequence Analysis and Genetic Characterization of the Sweet potato feathery mottle virus O and RC Strains Isolated from China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2207-2218.
[15]	ZHAO Yong,ZHAO PeiFang,HU Xin,ZHAO Jun,ZAN FengGang,YAO Li,ZHAO LiPing,YANG Kun,QIN Wei,XIA HongMing,LIU JiaYong. Evaluation of 317 Sugarcane Germplasm Based on Agronomic Traits Rating Data [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 602-615.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Genetic Variation of Four Physiological Indexes as Impacted by Water Stress in Sugarcane

RichHTML

PDF