Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 540-547.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.03.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Multilevel Nonlinear Mixed Effect Model for Evaluation of   Muscovy Ducks Body Weight for Growth

 ZHANG  Yuan-Yue, HE  Xi   

  1. 1.湖南农业大学动物科学技术学院, 长沙 410128
  • Received:2011-02-27 Online:2012-02-01 Published:2011-09-20

Abstract: 【Objective】 Research on quantificationally describing the model of body weight growth of native Muscovy ducks was carried out. 【Method】 Four body weight growth models were designed using Richards growth function, including 2-level nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual and gender (ModelⅠ), 2-level nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual and gender with autoregressive correlation structure (Model Ⅱ), 1-level nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual (Model Ⅲ), and 0-level nonlinear fixed effect model ignoring individual and gender (Model Ⅳ), to describe the growth characters of individual and population of Muscovy ducks. Information criteria,error variance, average measured and fitted values at different ages, and estimates obtained by fitting the models and growth parameters were compared. 【Result】 The results showed that Model Ⅱ had the best effect overall fit. It was estimated by the model that the birth weight, the mature weight, and the inflexion point age, the body weight and the absolute growth rate at maximum growth rate of male and female native Muscovy ducks were 40 g, 3 504 g, 43 d, 1 523 g, and 65 g•d-1, and 40 g, 2 209 g, 36 d, 977 g, and 45 g•d-1, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Multilevel Richards nonlinear mixed effect model considering individual and gender with autoregressive correlation structure was the best growth model for fitting the body growth of male or female native Muscovy ducks.

Key words: multilevel nonlinear mixed effect model, body growth, Muscovy ducks, evaluation

[1]Crawford R C. Poultry Genetics and Breeding. New York: Elsevier Science Publisher, 1990.

[2]张元跃, 柳小春. 番鸭体重生长非线性混合效应模型评价的研究. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(19): 4101-4108.

Zhang Y Y, Liu X C. Study on nonlinear mixed effect model for evaluation of Muscovy body weight for growth. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(19): 4101-4108. (in Chinese)

[3]Schinckel A P, Adeola O, Einstein M E. Evaluation of alternative nonlinear mixed effects models of duck growth. Poultry Science, 2005, 84: 256-264.

[4]Zuidhof M J. Mathematical characterization of broiler carcass yield dynamics. Poultry Science, 2005, 84: 1108-1122.

[5]Wang Z, Zuidhof M J. Estimation of growth parameters using a nonlinear mixed Gompertz model. Poultry Science, 2004, 83: 847-852.

[6]Aggrey S E. Logistic nonlinear mixed effects model for estimating growth parameters. Poultry Science, 2009, 88(2): 276-270.

[7]Romero L F, Zuidhof M J, Renema R A, Robinson F E, Naeima A. Nonlinear mixed models to study metabolizable energy utilization in broiler breeder hens. Poultry Science, 2009, 88: 1310-1320.

[8]Sauer N, Emrich K, Piepho H P, Lemme A, Redshaw M S, Mosenthin R. Meta-analysis of the relative efficiency of methionine-hydroxy- analogue-free-acid compared with dl-Methionine in broilers using nonlinear mixed models. Poultry Science, 2008, 87: 2023-2031.

[9]Darmani K, Kebreab E, Lopez S, France J. An evaluation of different growth function for describing the profile of live weight with time(age) in meat and egg strains of chicken. Poultry Science, 2003, 82(7): 1536-1543.

[10]Zanton G I, Heinrichs A J. Evaluation of modeling procedure for fitting in situ feed degradation profiles. Journal of animal Science, 2009, 87: 2080-2088.

[11]Nahashon S N, Aggrey S E, Adefope N A, Amenyenu A, Wright D. Gompertz-Laird model prediction of optimum utilization of crude protein and metabolizable energy by French guinea fowl broilers. Poultry Science, 2010, 89: 52-57.

[12]Porter T, Kebreab E, Kuhi H D, Strathe A B, France J. Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poultry Science, 2010, 89: 371-378.

[13]Vitezica Z G, Marie-Etancelin C, Bernadet X M D. Comparison of nonlinear and spline regression models for describing mule duck growth. Poultry Science, 2010, 89(8): 1778-1784.

[14]Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. 4th ed. London: Wiley, 2011.

[15]Strathe A B, Danfær A, Sørensen H, Kebreab E. A multilevel nonlinear mixed-effects approach to model growth in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 88(2): 638-649.

[16]National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. Washington: National Academy of Sciences, 1994.

[17]Littell R C, Milliken G A, Stroup W W, Wolfinger R D, Schabenberger O. SAS System for Mixed Models. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2006.  

[18]SAS Institute. SAS / STAT User’s Guide. 9.2 version. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2008.

[19]Brown H A, Fitzhugh J R, Cartwright T C. Comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 1976, 42(4): 810-818.

[20]Fitzhugh H A. Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shapes. Journal of Animal Science, 1976, 42(5): 1036-1051.

[21]R Foundation for Statistical Computintg R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www. R-project.org Accessed Oct. 1, 2010.

[22]Pinheiro J, Bates D M. Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-97. Foundation for statistical computing, 2010.

[23]National Research Council. Microlivestock: Little-known Small Animals with a Promising Economic Future. Washington, D C: National Academy of Sciences, 1991.

[24]Hall D B, Clutter M. Multivariate multilevel nonlinear mixed effects models for timber yield predictions. Biometrics, 2004, 60: 16-24.

[25]Sauvant D, Milgen J V, Faverdin P, Friggens N. Modelling Nutrient Digestion and  Itilisation in Farm Animals. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Press, 2010.
[1] CUI JieHao, ZHANG Meng, WANG Qin, YU JiaYan, LIN Kun, LI ShangZe, LAN Heng, GENG YanQiu, ZHANG Qiang, GUO LiYing, SHAO XiWen. Evaluation of Lodging Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Japonica Rice Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438.
[2] ZHANG ZhiLin, LIU Rong, ZONG XuXiao, HAO XiaoPeng, YANG Tao. Integrated Multi-Stage Evaluation of Salt Tolerance in Vicia faba L. and Itaconic Acid-Mediated Alleviation of Germination-Stage Salt Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1172-1188.
[3] CHEN MinDong, QIU BoYin, HUANG Hao, LI YongPing, WEN QingFang. Evaluation of Curd Texture Quality in Loose-Curd Cauliflower Germplasm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1302-1316.
[4] ZHANG LiDong, GUO YiCong, HUANG HongYu, NIE Jing, WANG Bing, LI MengYu, LI JiaWang, SUI XiaoLei, LI YuHe. Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100.
[5] JIAO WenJuan, HE WanLong, GENG HongWei, BAI Bin, LI JianFeng, CHENG YuKun. Stripe Rust Resistance Evaluation and Molecular Characterization of Yr Genes for 155 Spring Wheat Varieties (Lines) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 937-950.
[6] HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[7] JI ShengYang, LU BaiYi, LI PeiWu. Some Reflections on Modern Science of Agricultural Product Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1830-1844.
[8] YUE RunQing, LI WenLan, DING ZhaoHua, MENG ZhaoDong. Molecular Characteristics and Resistance Evaluation of Transgenic Maize LD05 with Stacked Insect and Herbicide Resistance Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1269-1283.
[9] YAO Li, DENG ChunXiu, TANG Biao, WANG Hong, WU YueYing, ZHANG Qi, LI YuanHong, LIU ZhongYou, LU ChangAi, LIN ChaoWen. Suitability Evaluation of Late Maturing Citrus in Dongpo District, Meishan City, Sichuan Province Based on Maximum Entropy Model (MaxEnt) and Geographic Information System (GIS) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 748-758.
[10] TIAN XianXian, FENG ShaoFang, WANG Qing, PAN ChenDong, LI Bo, FANG KaiXing, WU HuaLing, QIN DanDan. Biochemical Characteristics Analysis and Suitability Evaluation of Liannan Daye Tea Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4797-4812.
[11] CHEN TianXiao, CAO Rong, SONG QianNan, HU LiangLiang, WANG SuHua, WANG LiXia, CHENG XuZhen, CHEN HongLin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage and Screening of Tolerant Germplasm in Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4317-4332.
[12] CHEN YongXian, CHEN RuiJiang, DU YiZhi, ZHU JunJie, CHEN WanXia, ZHAO ZiHan, WANG JiChun, DU Kang, ZHANG Kai. Screening and Identification of Drought-Tolerant Sweet Potato Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 214-237.
[13] TANG GuiMei, LI WeiDong, ZHOU YuXia, KONG YouHan, XIAO XiaoLing, PENG YingShu, ZHANG Li, FU HongYan, LIU Yang, HUANG GuoLin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cymbidium faberi Germplasm Resources Based on Phenotypic Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 339-354.
[14] HU JiaYan, SHEN ZhiHan, WEN LiHui, YU JiaHao, ZHANG YuJun, JIANG DongHua. Identification and Evaluation of Biocontrol Actinomycetes Against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola for Disease Suppression and Growth Promotion in Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(17): 3434-3450.
[15] YU Huan, LIN Ling, GUO RongRong, CAO XiongJun, WANG Bo, FANG JingGui, XIE ShuYu, HUANG XiaoYun, HAN JiaYu, BAI XianJin. Investigation and Evaluation of Inflorescence Attachment and Quality of Grape Germplasm Resources in The Hot Zone Guangxi [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(17): 3503-3515.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!