Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2011, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 2284-2293 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.11.010

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Cropland-Use Management on Potentials of Soil Carbon Sequestration and Carbon Emission Mitigation in China

WANG Xiao-bin, WU Xue-ping, ZHAO Quan-sheng, DENG Xiang-zheng, CAI Dian-xiong   

  1. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所/农业部植物营养与养分循环重点实验室
  • Received:2010-07-05 Revised:2010-08-10 Online:2011-06-01 Published:2011-06-01

Abstract:

Changes in land use, especially in cropland-use management, induced by human activities is one of the most important factors influencing climate change. In China, facing the huge pressure of dealing with climate change, the research on the relations between cropland-use management and soil carbon (C) sink, and the effects of cropland-use management on soil C sequestration and C emission mitigation is important, aiming at providing a decision-making basis for improvement of soil C sequestration and C emission mitigation in China. Through the literature reviews, this paper analyzes the impact of cropland-use management on soil C sequestration and C emission mitigation in China. As literature reviewed, agriculture is not only a main source of C emission, but also a sink of C sequestration. Through improvement of cropland-use management (such as increasing straw return into the soil, organic fertilizer application, and no-till/reduced tillage practices, etc.), there has shown an increasing trend in soil C sink in cropland since the last 20 years. Based on the estimation of soil C sequestration in cropland in China, especially with the recommended management practices, especially in the future 50 years, the potential for soil C sequestration in cropland of China is estimated about 87-393 TgC·a-1, thus offsetting about 11%-52% of the total industry C emissions, in which improved cropland-use management (including straw return, organic fertilizer application, and no-till/reduced tillage) could share about 30%-36% of C sequestration. This shows that cropland-use management in China could play an important role in soil C sequestration and C emission mitigation.

Key words: China, cropland-use management, soil carbon sequestration, carbon emission

[1] YUAN HaoLiang, NIE Jun, LI Peng, LU YanHong, LIAO YuLin, XU ChangXu, LI ZhongYi, CAO WeiDong, ZHANG JiangLin. Effects of Co-Utilization of Chinese Milk Vetch and Rice Straw on Soil Phosphorus Composition and Phosphorus Activation of Paddy Field in Southern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1480-1491.
[2] ZHANG WeiJian, YAN ShengJi, SHANG ZiYin, TANG ZhiWei, WU LiuGe, LI JiaRui, CHEN HaoTian, DENG AiXing, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Xin, ZHENG ChengYan, SONG ZhenWei. Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields: Not Entirely Attributable to Rice Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 824-833.
[3] LI Bei, ZHENG JiaXi, ZHANG HuiJie. Regional Disparities, Spatial Agglomeration and Dynamic Evolution of Planting Industry Eco-Efficiency in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 687-704.
[4] GUO HuiTing, SUN YanWen, NIU YiHeng, LI YaPeng, LI JianHua, XU MingGang. Fertilization Significantly Changed Soil Bacterial Diversity and Dominant Microbial Community in Croplands of Northern China—Meta Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 114-128.
[5] ZHANG HaoXin, YU ShengYue, LEI QiuLiang, DU XinZhong, ZHANG Jizong, AN MiaoYing, FAN BingQian, LUO JiaFa, LIU HongBin. Simulating Soil Organic Carbon Dynamic Changes in Dryland and Paddy Field of Northeast China Using RothC Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1564-1578.
[6] ZHAO TongTong, GU XiaoBo, TAN ChuanDong, YAN TingLin, LI XiaoYan, CHANG Tian, DU YaDan. Effects of Water-Nitrogen Coupling on the Mineralization of Organic Carbon and Nitrogen for Mulched Farmland Soils in the Arid Regions of Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(5): 929-942.
[7] ZHENG Yu, CHEN Yi, TI JinSong, SHI LongFei, XU XiaoBo, LI YuLin, GUO Rui. Evaluation of Carbon Footprint and Economic Benefit of Different Tobacco Rotation Patterns [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 733-747.
[8] ZHANG SiJia, YANG Jie, ZHAO Shuai, LI LiWei, WANG GuiYan. The Impact of Diversified Crops and Wheat-Maize Rotations on Soil Quality in the North China Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 238-251.
[9] YIN MinHao, CHEN ChiBo, LU YiHeng, TIAN Yun. China's Agricultural Carbon Emission Density: Spatiotemporal Characteristics, Dynamic Evolution, and Spatial Effect [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(18): 3710-3727.
[10] SUN JianFei, CHENG Kun. A Review of Soil Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Quantification in Cropland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(11): 2190-2205.
[11] ZHANG Yang, GAO Yan, ZHANG Yan, HUANG DanDan, CHEN XueWen, ZHANG ShiXiu, LIANG AiZhen. Effects of Residue Return Methods on Nitrogen Mineralization and N-Cycling Functional Genes in Black Soil of Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(10): 1958-1968.
[12] ZHU RuiMing, ZHAO RongQin, JIAO ShiXing, LI XiaoJian, XIAO LianGang, XIE ZhiXiang, YANG QingLin, WANG Shuai, ZHANG HuiFang. Spatial Distribution and Driving Factors of Winter Wheat Irrigation Carbon Emission Intensity at Township Level in Henan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(5): 950-964.
[13] TIAN Yun, WANG XiaoRui, YIN MinHao, ZHANG HuiJie. Re-Evaluation of China’s Agricultural Net Carbon Sink: Current Situation, Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Influencing Factors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(22): 4507-4521.
[14] LONG HuaiYu, LU ChangAi, JI HongJie, ZHANG RenLian. A Retrieval System for Great Soil Groups from China’s Provisional Soil Classification System for the 3rd National Soil Census [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(21): 4264-4275.
[15] CHEN Shi, HUANG YinLan, JIN YunXiang, XU ChengLin, ZOU JinQiu. Agricultural Climatic Factors and Their Thresholds for Winter Wheat Cultivation in Northern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(16): 3142-3153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!