Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 2484-2498.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.11.013

• FOOD SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Dough Floc Images and Physicochemical Properties During Oat Dough Mixing Stage and Construction of Deep Learning Recognition Model

HOU ChenZi1(), LI XiaoPing1, WANG XiaoLong1, GUO LaiChun2, REN ChangZhong2, HU XinZhong1()   

  1. 1 College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119
    2 Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baicheng 137000, Jilin
  • Received:2025-11-06 Accepted:2026-01-09 Online:2026-06-01 Published:2026-06-03
  • Contact: HU XinZhong

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to classify the stages of oat dough mixing, analyze the mechanisms by which oat dough flocs regulate product quality at each stage, and develop a model to identify these stages, so as to provide a theoretical basis and technical support for enhancing the automation of oat flour product processing.【Method】Oat dough flocs images during oat flour mixing were used as the dataset. Morphological information was first extracted from these images to classify the stages of oat dough mixing. Subsequently, the regulatory mechanisms of dough floc properties on product quality at each stage were elucidated, focusing on gelatinization degree, amylose content, intermolecular forces, textural properties, rheological properties and moisture distribution of dough flocs. Finally, a simple and efficient prediction model for oat dough mixing stages was developed by combining a convolutional neural network (ResNet-50) with a support vector machine (SVM).【Result】Based on changes in the image shadow area combined with cluster analysis, the oat dough mixing process was divided into four distinct stages: water absorption and adhesion, agglomeration into a mass, dynamic equilibrium, and rupture followed by dispersion. Three key trends were observed during the mixing process: first, the gelatinization degree of oat dough flocs gradually increased and stabilized at the dynamic equilibrium stage, while the amylose content decreased gradually and stabilized at the same stage; second, the effects of disulfide bonds, hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions progressively enhanced; third, textural analysis showed that from the water absorption and adhesion stage to the dynamic equilibrium stage, the hardness, chewiness, and elasticity of oat dough flocs all increased and reached their maximum values, whereas hardness began to decrease at the rupture and dispersion stage. Additionally, the K value of rheological properties showed an upward trend from the water absorption and adhesion stage to the dynamic equilibrium stage, indicating improved dough strength and stability of the oat dough flocs. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) analysis further revealed that moisture migrated from the free state to the bound state (A22-1, and A22-2) and finally reached a stable state at the dynamic equilibrium stage. Notably, the ResNet-50-SVM-based prediction model for oat dough floc image stages achieved a recognition accuracy of 90%.【Conclusion】The oat dough mixing process could be divided into four stages based on the shadow area of dough floc images, with significant variations in dough floc quality across these stages. Specifically, at the dynamic equilibrium stage, particle uniformity and processability of oat dough flocs were optimized, making this stage the ideal processing window for oat noodle production. The established model enabled reliable identification and classification of dough mixing stages, providing the methodological and technical support for the automated processing of oat noodle products.

Key words: oat, dough flocs image analysis, deep learning, recognition model, physicochemical properties analysis

Table 1

Basic indicators of six types of oat flour(Dry basis)"

样品
Sample
水分含量
Moisture Content (%)
脂肪含量
Fat content
(%)
蛋白质含量
Protein content
(%)
β-葡聚糖含量β-Glucan content (%) 淀粉含量
Starch content
(%)
初始糊化度Gelatinization degree (%)
HN 4.32±0.12f 6.98±0.12b 15.30±0.19a 3.89±0.34b 54.48±1.98e 30.58±0.44f
LB 8.76±0.06b 6.49±0.16c 12.95±0.05c 2.19±0.18d 58.86±1.03d 35.56±0.28e
XB 4.50±0.08e 7.46±0.12a 12.12±.0.02d 2.53±0.19c 63.30±1.81c 38.01±0.53d
SZ 8.58±0.08c 7.23±0.12b 13.83±0.12b 4.23±0.22a 62.94±1.10c 39.36±0.36c
WC 11.36±0.13a 6.28±0.05d 12.17±0.07d 1.46±0.09e 72.54±1.69a 41.15±0.64b
YS 6.62±0.17d 5.90±0.17e 10.68±0.13e 1.63±0.21e 68.19±1.72b 42.95±0.38a
平均值Average value 7.36 6.72 12.84 2.66 63.39 37.94
变异系数 CV 0.37 0.09 0.12 0.44 0.10 0.15

Fig. 1

Image processing and particle size proportion of oat dough flocs in different dough-kneading times"

Fig. 2

Classification of oat dough flocs in different dough mixing stages"

Fig. 3

Physicochemical properties and related analysis of oat dough flocs in different dough-making stages Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05)"

Table 2

Fitting parameters of dynamic frequency sweep curves of oat dough flocs in different dough mixing stages"

和面时间
Dough-kneading time
z K
(×105)
R2 硬度
Hardness (g)
内聚性
Resilience (g.s)
阶段 1 Stage 1 0.090±0.002a 1.44±0.02c 0.992 18105.29±101.74c 0.28±0.01c
阶段 2 Stage 2 0.094±0.001a 1.65±0.04b 0.993 21627.88±159.69b 0.31±0.01b
阶段 3 Stage 3 0.094±0.003a 1.72±0.04a 0.994 23201.24±231.29a 0.35±0.03a
阶段 4 Stage 4 0.090±0.004a 1.55±0.01b 0.992 21739.69±894.81b 0.29±0.02c
不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05) Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05)

Fig. 4

Oat dough mixing stages and automatic identification model"

[1]
任长忠, 闫金婷, 董锐, 胡新中. 燕麦营养成分、功能特性及其产品的研究进展. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(12): 438-446.
REN C Z, YAN J T, DONG R, HU X Z. Research progress on oat nutrients, functional properties and related products. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(12): 438-446. (in Chinese)
[2]
谷玉娟. 熟化对裸燕麦加工品质特性的影响及作用机理研究[D]. 郑州: 河南工业大学, 2023.
GU Y J. Effects of curing treatment on the processing quality of naked oat and the underlying mechanism[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan University of Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
[3]
KLOSE C, ARENDT E K. Proteins in oats; their synthesis and changes during germination: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2012, 52(7): 629-639.

doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.504902 pmid: 22530714
[4]
彭湃, 王晓龙, 马兰, 邹晓阳, 马倩莹, 张心语, 李小平, 胡新中. 燕麦麸粉和苦荞皮粉的添加对小麦面条结构、蒸煮品质及消化特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(20): 4102-4114. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.20.014.
PENG P, WANG X L, MA L, ZOU X Y, MA Q Y, ZHANG X Y, LI X P, HU X Z. Effects of oat bran flour and Tartary buckwheat bran flour on structure, cooking quality and digestive characteristics of wheat noodles. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(20): 4102-4114. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.20.014. (in Chinese)
[5]
刘振蓉, 赵武奇, 胡新中, 贺刘成, 陈月圆. 燕麦挂面制作过程中干燥工艺优化研究. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4927-4942. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.24.011.
LIU Z R, ZHAO W Q, HU X Z, HE L C, CHEN Y Y. Optimization of drying process in oat noodle production. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4927-4942. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.24.011. (in Chinese)
[6]
何晴, 孙莹莹, 刘文秋, 高丽茵, 李丰勇, 张婵. 机器视觉技术在食品检测中的应用研究进展. 食品与发酵工业, 2026, 52(8): 411-419.

doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.043465
HE Q, SUN Y Y, LIU W Q, GAO L Y, LI F Y, ZHANG C. Research progress on application of machine vision technology in food inspection. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2026, 52(8): 411-419. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.043465
[7]
瞿炜, 李力, 杨洁. 破解深度学习-核心篇:模型算法与实现. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2024: 45-78.
QU W, LI L, YANG J. Cracking Deep Learning-Core Chapter:Model Algorithm and Implementation. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press, 2024: 45-78. (in Chinese)
[8]
谢家兴, 廖飞, 王卫星, 高鹏, 胡凯, 吴佩文, 邓钲奇, 刘洪山. 基于改进Faster R-CNN的荔枝病虫害检测. 华中农业大学学报, 2025, 44(1): 62-73.
XIE J X, LIAO F, WANG W X, GAO P, HU K, WU P W, DENG Z Q, LIU H S. Detecting diseases and insect pests in Litchi based on improved Faster R-CNN. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2025, 44(1): 62-73. (in Chinese)
[9]
龙满生, 欧阳春娟, 刘欢, 付青. 基于卷积神经网络与迁移学习的油茶病害图像识别. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(18): 194-201.
LONG M S, OUYANG C J, LIU H, FU Q. Image recognition of Camellia oleifera diseases based on convolutional neural network & transfer learning. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(18): 194-201. (in Chinese)
[10]
桂江生, 吴子娴, 李凯. 基于卷积神经网络模型的大豆花叶病初期高光谱检测. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(2): 256-262.
GUI J S, WU Z X, LI K. Hyperspectral imaging for early detection of soybean mosaic disease based on convolutional neural network model. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 2019, 45(2): 256-262. (in Chinese)
[11]
徐子龙, 杨柳, 肖轩, 范雨超, 罗洋, 李瑜, 裴后昌, 张永林. 基于LSP与GLCM方法的碎米识别特性研究. 中国粮油学报, 2023, 38(10): 196-203.
XU Z L, YANG L, XIAO X, FAN Y C, LUO Y, LI Y, PEI H C, ZHANG Y L. Research on identification characteristics of broken rice based on LSP and GLCM methods. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2023, 38(10): 196-203. (in Chinese)
[12]
赵嘉辉. 基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的烤烟烟叶智能化分级方法应用研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2023.
ZHAO J H. Application of intelligent classification method for flue-cured tobacco leaves based on convolutional neural network (CNN)[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2023. (in Chinese)
[13]
LIU R, XING Y N, ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG B, JIANG X J, WEI Y M. Effect of mixing time on the structural characteristics of noodle dough under vacuum. Food Chemistry, 2015, 188: 328-336.

doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.045 pmid: 26041200
[14]
史赵建. 小麦面条和面阶段面絮图像识别与面絮特性研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2022.
SHI Z J. Image recognition of dough crumbs at the mixing stages and study on characteristics of the crumbs[D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2022. (in Chinese)
[15]
BIRCH G G, PRIESTLEY R J. Degree of gelatinisation of cooked rice. Starch-Stärke, 1973, 25(3): 98-100.

doi: 10.1002/star.v25:3
[16]
WANG K Q, LUO S Z, ZHONG X Y, CAI J, JIANG S T, ZHENG Z. Changes in chemical interactions and protein conformation during heat-induced wheat gluten gel formation. Food Chemistry, 2017, 214: 393-399.

doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.037
[17]
施建斌, 隋勇, 蔡沙, 何建军, 熊添, 范传会, 陈学玲, 家志文, 王少华, 蔡芳, 蒋修军, 梅新. 挤压处理荞麦对面团特性和面条品质的影响. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(9): 172-177.
SHI J B, SUI Y, CAI S, HE J J, XIONG T, FAN C H, CHEN X L, JIA Z W, WANG S H, CAI F, JIANG X J, MEI X. Effect of extruded buckwheat powder on dough characteristic and noodle quality. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(9): 172-177. (in Chinese)
[18]
GAO L, CHENG W W, FU M X, WU D, TANG X Z. Effect of improved extrusion cooking technology modified buckwheat flour on whole buckwheat dough and noodle quality. Food Structure, 2022, 31: 100248.

doi: 10.1016/j.foostr.2021.100248
[19]
刘玲, 马鑫鑫, 史赵建, 胡新中. 从水分迁移角度阐释压延间距对小麦鲜面品质的影响. 食品科学, 2023, 44(4): 152-161.
LIU L, MA X X, SHI Z J, HU X Z. Influence of sheeting gap on the quality of fresh wheat noodles from the perspective of water migration. Food Science, 2023, 44(4): 152-161. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20211219-217
[20]
王禧恺, 张峰, 刘叶楠, 牛艳荣. 基于ResNet50+GCN的图像与位姿信息融合室内位置感知方法. 探测与控制学报, 2025. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1316.tj.20250725.1543.002.
WANG X K, ZHANG F, LIU T N, NIU Y R. Research on indoor positioning method fusing image and pose information based on ResNet50 and GCN. Journal of Detection & Control, 2025. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1316.tj.20250725.1543.002. (in Chinese)
[21]
庞俊彪. 机器学习:慕课版. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2024: 89-105.
PANG J B. Machine Learning. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press, 2024: 89-105. (in Chinese)
[22]
王晋东. 迁移学习导论. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2021.
WANG J D. Introduction to Transfer Learning. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2021. (in Chinese)
[23]
傅婕, 吴跃. 基于偏振成像技术的大米品种真实性识别. 食品工业科技, 2025, 46(7): 235-247.
FU J, WU Y. Authenticity recognition of rice varieties based on polarization imaging technology. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(7): 235-247. (in Chinese)
[24]
韩晓彤, 杨保军, 李苏炫, 廖福兵, 刘淑华, 唐健, 姚青. 基于图像的水稻纹枯病智能测报方法. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1557-1567. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.08.007.
HAN X T, YANG B J, LI S X, LIAO F B, LIU S H, TANG J, YAO Q. Intelligent forecasting method of rice sheath blight based on images. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1557-1567. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.08.007. (in Chinese)
[25]
龚玉圆, 冯媛, 王晓龙, 马蓁, 任田, 李小平, 刘柳, 胡新中. 加工方式对燕麦制品营养成分及功能特性的影响. 中国粮油学报, 2020, 35(9): 21-27.
GONG Y Y, FENG Y, WANG X L, MA Z, REN T, LI X P, LIU L, HU X Z. Effects of processing methods on nutritional components and functional characteristics of oat products. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2020, 35(9): 21-27. (in Chinese)
[26]
史赵建, 胡新中, 李亮, 刘玲, 雷洋. 小麦面条和面过程不同阶段面絮的划分与自动识别. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(5): 279-287.
SHI Z J, HU X Z, LI L, LIU L, LEI Y. Classification and automated identification of dough crumbs at different stages of the wheat noodles mixing process. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(5): 279-287. (in Chinese)
[27]
HUANG Z Q, LU J P, LI X H, TONG Z F. Effect of mechanical activation on physico-chemical properties and structure of cassava starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2007, 68(1): 128-135.

doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.07.017
[28]
HOPKINS E J, NEWLING B, HUCL P, SCANLON M G, NICKERSON M T. Water mobility and association by 1H NMR and diffusion experiments in simple model bread dough systems containing organic acids. Food Hydrocolloids, 2019, 95: 283-291.

doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.04.018
[29]
FRANZONI M B, TEOBALDI A G, BARRERA G N, ACOSTA R H, RIBOTTA P D, VELASCO M I. NMR characterization of structure and moisture sorption dynamics of damaged starch granules. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2022, 285: 119220.

doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119220
[30]
TANG H R, GODWARD J, HILLS B. The distribution of water in native starch granules: A multinuclear NMR study. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2000, 43(4): 375-387.

doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00183-1
[31]
MARIOTTI M, PAGANI M A, LUCISANO M. The role of buckwheat and HPMC on the breadmaking properties of some commercial gluten-free bread mixtures. Food Hydrocolloids, 2013, 30(1): 393-400.

doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.07.005
[32]
ZHANG Y J, ZHANG Y, AI Z L, ZHANG H. Thermal, rheological properties and microstructure of hydrated gluten as influenced by antifreeze protein from oat (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Cereal Science, 2020, 93: 102934.

doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2020.102934
[33]
SULLIVAN P, O’FLAHERTY J, BRUNTON N, ARENDT E, GALLAGHER E. The utilisation of barley middlings to add value and health benefits to white breads. Journal of Food Engineering, 2011, 105(3): 493-502.

doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.03.011
[34]
TESTER R F, DEBON S J J, SOMMERVILLE M D. Annealing of maize starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2000, 42(3): 287-299.

doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(99)00170-8
[35]
ZHOU Y, ZHAO D, FOSTER T J, LIU Y X, WANG Y, NIRASAWA S, TATSUMI E, CHENG Y Q. Konjac glucomannan-induced changes in thiol/disulphide exchange and gluten conformation upon dough mixing. Food Chemistry, 2014, 143: 163-169.

doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.088 pmid: 24054226
[36]
郭学艺, 董桂梅, 申瑞玲, 李云龙. 高糊化度苦荞全粉对鲜湿面条品质的影响. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(4): 42-49, 88.
GUO X Y, DONG G M, SHEN R L, LI Y L. Effect of high-gelatinized Tartary buckwheat flour on the quality of fresh wet noodles. Journal of Light Industry, 2024, 39(4): 42-49, 88. (in Chinese)
[37]
刘庆飞, 张宏立, 王艳玲. 基于深度可分离卷积的实时农业图像逐像素分类研究. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(19): 3673-3682. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.005.
LIU Q F, ZHANG H L, WANG Y L. Real-time pixel-wise classification of agricultural images based on depth-wise separable convolution. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(19): 3673-3682. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.19.005. (in Chinese)
[38]
齐星荟. 基于高光谱遥感的小麦品质监测及筋型分类研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2025.
QI X H. Research on quality monitoring and gluten type classification of wheat based on hyperspectral remote sensing[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2025. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG ZhiGao, LI LiuBin, XU Ying, JU ChengHui, HE Rong. Image Processing-Based Detection Method for Corn Damage Ratio and Synchronous Analysis of Quality Variation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(9): 1987-2001.
[2] MA HuiFeng, WEN ShuLiang, LIU WanYan, LIN YaQiu, LI Xin, LIU KeHan, ZHU HuiYing, XUE FuLai, XING JiaNi. Functional Study of Goat CSRP3 Gene on Myoblast Differentiation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(9): 2002-2015.
[3] JIA ZiCheng, QIN BingYu, MA CaiYing, DU Yong, LIU TongGao, XUE RuiLin, WANG XiaoLong, ZHOU ShiWei. Effects of Diets with Different Nutritional Levels on Maternal-Infant Integrated Production Performance and Rumen Microorganisms of Double-Lamb Shanbei White Cashmere Goats [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 668-686.
[4] YANG Lin, DUAN PuShun, WANG FengWu, WANG QianJun, ZHENG ChengZhong, MEI Xue, WANG XiQuan, ZHAO BaoPing. Effects of Endogenous Hormones and Source-Sink-Flow Relationships on Grain Yield in Oat Under Reduced Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(11): 2358-2373.
[5] WANG Niu, SHI XinRan, ZHANG WeiDong, WANG Xin. Effect of FGF5 and FGF21 on Proliferation of Dermal Papilla Cells in Cashmere Goat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 819-830.
[6] WANG JiaXin, HU JingYi, ZHANG Wei, WEI Qian, WANG Tao, WANG XiaoLin, ZHANG Xiong, ZHANG PanPan. Effects of Different Mulching Methods on the Production of Photosynthetic Substances and Water Use Efficiency of Intercropped Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 460-477.
[7] ZHANG Fan, TANG XiangFang, YANG Liang, WANG Hui, CHEN RuiPeng, XIONG BenHai. Research Progress of Intelligent Monitoring Technology for Beef Cattle Production Performance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 5081-5096.
[8] XU XiuYuan, ZHANG HongZhi, XU LiJun, XUE Wei, NIE YingYing, GUO MingYing, LI JinXia, ZHAO YaRu, SHI MingJiang. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Photosynthetic Carbon Allocation in Pasture Based on 13C Pulse-Labeling Experiments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4346-4356.
[9] REN JiaHui, SUN JuanJuan, HAO YingLu, WANG FengWu, WANG JingYu, ZHANG MingWei, LI BaoHan, ZHENG ChengZhong, HE ZhuQing, WANG ZhaoLan. Screening of Feed Oat Varieties and Its Evaluation of Silage Quality in Central Inner Mongolia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(19): 4026-4038.
[10] ZHANG JianLong, XING WenWen, YE ShaoBo, ZHANG Chao, ZHENG DeCong. Oat Plant Height Estimation Based on a Dual Output Regression Convolutional Neural Network [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(20): 3974-3985.
[11] WANG XiaoJun, WANG JinLan, JU ZeLiang, LIANG GuoLing, JIA ZhiFeng, LIU WenHui, MA Xiang, MA JinXiu, LI Wen. Comprehensive Evaluation on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Different Varieties of Forage Oat in the Qinghai Lake Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(19): 3730-3742.
[12] WANG YunYun, LI YiNian, CHEN YuLun, DING QiShuo, HE RuiYin. A Method for Testing Phenotype Parameters of Wheat Grains on Spike Based on Improved Mask R-CNN [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2322-2335.
[13] CHEN HengGuang, PEI XiaoMeng, XIA YuTing, LIU Jing, MAO DaGan. Effects of Adding Curcumin to Perinatal Diets on Production Performance, Blood Indexes and Gene Expression of Inflammatory Factors in Goats [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2483-2496.
[14] MIAO Long, SHU Kuo, HU YanJiao, HUANG Ru, HE GenHua, ZHANG WenMing, WANG XiaoBo, QIU LiJuan. Identification and Gene Mapping of Hard Seededness Mutant Mzp661 in Soybean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2065-2078.
[15] WANG Peng, LIU ZiYi, LIU YuFang, CHU MingXing. miR-535 Targets the GAB2 Gene to Promote Goat Granulosa Cell Proliferation Through Activation of the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(23): 4757-4771.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!