大豆芽期拟茎点种腐病鉴定体系构建及抗性种质筛选

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.11.004

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】An accurate and rapid indoor evaluation system was established by using soybeans with different resistance levels to Phomopsis seed decay as test materials. And then 170 soybean germplasm accessions were employed to screened out disease-resistant varieties, so as to provide methods and material basis for high-throughput assessment of Phomopsis seed decay in soybean and cultivation of resistant varieties.【Method】In terms of establishing a reliable evaluation method for Phomopsis seed decay, Qihuang 34, Williams, Zhongzuo 09-560, z13-631-2, ZDD26268, Chenxiqingpidou 1 and Tongxianhuangdou were selected as experimental materials. For each soybean accession, the seeds with uniform size and undamaged seed coat were germinated in the dark after disinfection. At different germination stages, the pathogen of Phomopsis seed decay was inoculated for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h. The mycelium coverage rate and seed decay rate of seed surface under different infection time were counted to determine the optimal identification period for evaluating Phomopsis seed decay in soybean. Then, the resistance of 170 different soybean germplasms in natural population was identified by using the coverage rate of mycelium on the surface of seeds and the decay rate of seeds as evaluation indexes. The high disease resistance varieties were screened based on 5 disease resistance levels.【Result】The soybean accessions showed the most significant differences in disease resistance levels after 96 h of germination when mycelium coverage rate and seed decay rate of soybean surface were used as evaluation indexes. Further comparison of the incidence of 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h after infection showed that the difference in disease resistance between different varieties after infection for 72 h was the most obvious. Therefore, it was the most suitable period, 72 h of infection at the bud stage after 96 h of germination, for evaluating the resistance level of different soybean varieties to Phomopsis seed decay. The resistance of 170 soybean varieties to Phomopsis seed decay was identified and classified into five disease resistance grades, namely, high resistance, medium resistance, medium susceptibility, susceptibility and high susceptibility. Among them, there were 30 varieties of grade I (high resistance to disease), 51 varieties of grade Ⅱ (medium resistance to disease), 71 varieties of grade Ⅲ (medium disease susceptibility), 4 varieties of grade Ⅳ (disease susceptibility) and 14 varieties of grade V (high disease susceptibility), idicating that there are extensive variations in the resistance to Phomopsis seed decay of soybean germplasm resources in China.【Conclusion】In this study, the most optimum stage of disease identification was considered as soybean seeds after 96 h germination to infect the Phomopsis longicolla for 72 h. After that, the mycelium coverage rate and seed decay rate of soybean surface were counted as evaluation parameters. The evaluation system has high accuracy and reliability, which can provide an effective method for high-throughput identification of different varieties in the laboratory. And 30 highly resistant varieties were further screened to provide a material basis for the breeding of resistant varieties.

Key words: soybean, Phomopsis seed decay, evaluation system, disease-resistant variety

MIAO Long, YANG Lei, XU JingHao, LI Na, WANG FeiYu, QIU LiJuan, WANG XiaoBo. Establishment of Evaluation System and Screening of Disease- Resistant Accessions for Phomopsis Seed Decay in Soybean Germination Stage[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2092-2101.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

30 soybean varieties with high resistance to Phomopsis seed decay"

品种名称 Name of varieties	菌丝覆盖率平均值±标准差 Mean±SD (%)	种子腐烂率平均值±标准差 Mean±SD (%)	抗性等级 Grade
铁荚子Tiejiazi	0.00±0.00	0.00±0.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
金元1 Jinyuan No.1	0.00±0.00	0.00±0.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
陈茬大豆Chenchadadou	0.00±0.00	0.00±0.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
八月炸Bayuezha	0.00±0.00	0.00±0.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
泉变11 Quanbian 11	10.33±2.52	0.00±0.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
中黄30 Zhonghuang 30	7.00±2.00	0.00±0.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
黑豆Heidou	31.33±3.21	0.00±0.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
大屯小黑豆Datunxiaoheidou	40.67±4.04	7.33±2.52	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
WDD02069	0.00±0.00	11.67±2.08	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
青皮豆Qingpidou	0.00±0.00	8.33±1.53	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
平顶黄豆Pingdinghuangdou	0.00±0.00	10.00±2.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
茶豆Chadou	0.00±0.00	13.00±3.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
涟源虎皮豆Lianyuanhupidou	0.00±0.00	12.67±2.08	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
冬大豆Dongdadou	31.33±3.51	14.67±2.52	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
吉青3号Jiqing No.3	39.67±2.52	21.00±3.61	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
红豆Hongdou	80.33±2.52	22.00±2.65	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
房山黑豆-1 Fangshanheidou -1	81.67±2.08	22.33±2.52	Ⅰ级（高抗) HR
青皮1 Qingpi1	0.00±0.00	25.67±3.06	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
黑壳豆Heikedou	3.33±2.08	26.67±2.08	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
陇中黄602 Longzhonghuang 602	30.67±4.04	22.67±3.21	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
AGS162	51.00±2.65	22.33±3.06	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
迟黄豆1 Chihuangdou 1	53.67±3.21	24.67±3.51	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
中作09-560 Zhongzuo 09-560	75.33±4.73	27.00±2.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
WDD01831	0.00±0.00	30.00±4.00	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
ZDD26268	0.00±0.00	32.67±3.06	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
浙鲜豆2号Zhexiandou No.2	7.67±2.08	30.67±4.04	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
新垒头茶豆Xinleitouchadou	20.00±3.00	33.33±3.06	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
PI438342	29.67±1.53	32.33±2.08	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
中江红黄豆Zhongjianghonghuangdou	73.67±4.04	32.00±1.73	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR
山宁7号Shanning 7	81.33±4.16	29.33±3.06	Ⅰ级（高抗）HR

Table 4

References 32

[1]	HOBBS T W, SCHMITTHENNER A F, KUTER G A. A new Phomopsis species from soybean. Mycologia, 1985, 77(4): 535-544.
[2]	崔友林. 大豆茎枯病病原菌鉴定及3种检疫性大豆病原菌适生性分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2009.
	CUI Y L. Identification of pathogen causing soybean stem blight and potential geographic distribution of three quarantine pathogens of soybean[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009. (in Chinese)
[3]	HEPPERLY P R. Quality losses in Phomopsis-infected soybean seeds. Phytopathology, 1978, 68(12): 1684-1687.
[4]	WRATHER J A, SHANNON J G, STEVENS W E, SLEPER D A, ARELLI A P. Soybean cultivar and foliar fungicide effects on Phomopsis sp. seed infection. Plant Disease, 2004, 88(7): 721-723.
[5]	WRATHER J A, SLEPER D A, STEVENS W E, SHANNON J G, WILSON R F. Planting date and cultivar effects on soybean yield, seed quality, and Phomopsis sp. seed infection. Plant Disease, 2003, 87(5): 529-532.
[6]	MULIK M M. SINCLAIR J B. Phomopsis seed decay. Compendium of Soybean Diseases, 1999, 4: 31-32.
[7]	SINCLAIR J B. Phomopsis seed decay of soybeans-A prototype for studying seed disease. Plant Disease, 1993, 77(4): 329-334.
[8]	叶文武, 刘万才, 王源超. 中国大豆病虫害发生现状及全程绿色防控技术研究进展. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(2): 265-273.
	YE W W, LIU W C, WANG Y C. Occurrence status and whole- process green control technologies for soybean diseases and pests in China. Journal of Plant Protection, 2023, 50(2): 265-273. (in Chinese)
[9]	JACKSON E W, FENG C D, FENN P, CHEN P Y. Genetic mapping of resistance to Phomopsis seed decay in the soybean breeding line MO/PSD-0259 (PI562694) and Plant Introduction 80837. The Journal of Heredity, 2009, 100(6): 777-783.
[10]	ZHANG Y P, CHEN G Y, LUO S C, QU H X, TANG Y P, XIE Q X, ZHOU J S. Stress physiology and virulence characterization of Phomopsis asparagi (sacc.) bubak isolated from Asparagus in Jiangxi Province of China. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2012, 13(7): 1502-1508.
[11]	张岳平, 陈光宇, 罗绍春, 瞿华香. 芦笋重要真菌病害研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(31): 114-119.
	ZHANG Y P, CHEN G Y, LUO S C, QU H X. The advance of major fungal diseases studies on Asparagus officinalis L.. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(31): 114-119. (in Chinese)
[12]	马珂. 茄褐纹病菌生物学特性、致病性及寄主抗性机制的研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2005.
	MA K. Studies on physiological characteristics, pathogenicity of Phomopsis vexans and resistance of eggplant-to-eggplant Phomopsis rot[D]. Heifei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese)
[13]	崔友林, 段灿星, 丁俊杰, 王晓鸣, 武小菲, 朱振东. 一种新发生的大豆茎枯病病原菌鉴定. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(1): 99-103.
	CUI Y L, DUAN C X, DING J J, WANG X M, WU X F, ZHU Z D. Pathogen identification of a newly occurred soybean stem blight in China. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2010, 32(1): 99-103. (in Chinese)
[14]	HARTMAN G L, SINCLAIR J B, RUPE J C. Compendium of Soybean Diseases. 4th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: APS Press, 1999.
[15]	张建成, 顾建锋, 徐瑛, 杨兰英. 大豆拟茎点种腐病的研究进展及其检疫意义. 植物检疫, 2005, 19(3): 163-167.
	ZHANG J C, GU J F, XU Y, YANG L Y. Research progress and quarantine significance of soybean pseudostem rot. Plant Quarantine, 2005, 19(3): 163-167. (in Chinese)
[16]	ZIMMERMAN M S, MINOR H C. Inheritance of Phomopsis seed decay resistance in soybean PI 417479. Crop Science, 1993, 33(1): 96-100.
[17]	JACKSON E W, FENN P, CHEN P Y. Inheritance of resistance to Phomopsis seed decay in soybean PI 80837 and MO/PSD-0259 (PI 562694). Crop Science, 2005, 45(6): 2400-2404.
[18]	SHAN Z, LI S, LIU Y, YANG Z, YANG C, SHA A, CHEN H, CHEN S, ZHOU X A. First report of Phomopsis seed decay of soybean caused by Phomopsis longicolla in South China. Plant Disease, 2012, 96(11): 1693-1693.
[19]	DORRANCE A, BERRY S, ANDERSON T, MEHARG C. Isolation, storage, pathotype characterization, and evaluation of resistance for Phytophthora sojae in soybean. Plant Health Progress, 2007, 9: 35.
[20]	张晨, 陈汉, 王志昂, 董莎萌, 王源超, 叶文武. 大豆拟茎点种腐病菌Phomopsis longicolla荧光素酶标记菌株的制备及应用. 大豆科学, 2023, 42(3): 344-351.
	ZHANG C, CHEN H, WANG Z A, DONG S M, WANG Y C, YE W W. Generation and preliminary application of a luciferase labeled strain for soybean Phomopsis seed decay pathogen Phomopsis longicolla. Soybean Science, 2023, 42(3): 344-351. (in Chinese)
[21]	李雪光, 李淑娴, 宋洁, 许艳丽. 大豆拟茎点种腐病菌(Phomopsis longicolla)对大豆种子致病性及侵入部位研究. 大豆科学, 2014, 33(3): 455-457, 462.
	LI X G, LI S X, SONG J, XU Y L. The pathogenicity and infection site of Phomopsis longicolla on soybean seed. Soybean Science, 2014, 33(3): 455-457, 462. (in Chinese)
[22]	黑龙江省市场监督管理局. 大豆对大豆拟茎点种腐病抗病性鉴定技术规程: DB23/T 2979-2021. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
	Heilongjiang Market Supervision and Administration. Technical specification for identification of soybean resistance to Phomopsis Seed Decay: DB23/T 2979-2021. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021. (in Chinese)
[23]	赵巍巍, 高必达, 陈枝楠, 王颖, 程颖慧. 8种杀菌剂对大豆南北方茎溃疡病菌和拟茎点种腐病菌的室内毒力测定. 农药, 2008, 47(1): 66-67.
	ZHAO W W, GAO B D, CHEN Z N, WANG Y, CHENG Y H. Toxicity of eight fungicides to Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivora, D. phaseolorum var. meridionalis and Phomopsis longicolla. Agrochemicals, 2008, 47(1): 66-67. (in Chinese)
[24]	BOSS P K, ROBINSON S P. Analysis of the expression of anthocyanin pathway genes in developing Vitis vinifera L. cv Shiraz grape berries and the implications for pathway regulation. Plant Physiology, 1996, 111(4): 1059-1066.
[25]	YANG J, YE W W, WANG X M, REN L R, YAO Y, WANG X L, WANG Y, DONG S M, ZHENG X B, WANG Y C. An improved method for the identification of soybean resistance to Phytophthora sojae applied to germplasm resources from the Huanghuaihai and Dongbei regions of China. Plant Disease, 2020, 104(2): 408-413.
[26]	LI S X. Development of a seedling inoculation technique for rapid evaluation of soybean for resistance to Phomopsis longicolla under controlled conditions. Plant Methods, 2018, 14: 81.
[27]	LI S X, MUSUNGU B, LIGHTFOOT D, JI P S. The interactomic analysis reveals pathogenic protein networks in Phomopsis longicolla underlying seed decay of soybean. Frontiers in Genetics, 2018, 9: 104.
[28]	DUVNJAK T, VRATARIC M, SUDARIC A, VRANDECIC K, MILICEVIC T. Pathogen-plant interaction: Phomopsis longicolla strain pathogenicity. Cereal Research Communications, 2007, 35(2): 361-364.
[29]	KURIBAYASHI T, LANKINEN P, MIKKONEN K S. A layered solid-state culture system for investigating the fungal growth and decay behaviour on the cellulosic substrate. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2023, 212: 106794.
[30]	XUE A G, MORRISON M J, COBER E, ANDERSON T R, RIOUX S, ABLETT G R, RAJCAN I, HALL R, ZHANG J X. Frequency of isolation of species of Diaporthe and Phomopsis from soybean plants in Ontario and benefits of seed treatments. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2007, 29(4): 354-364.
[31]	DIXON R A, ACHNINE L, KOTA P, LIU C J, SRINIVASA REDDY M S, WANG L J. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence - A genomics perspective. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2002, 3(5): 371-390.
[32]	SHERRIE S, PATRICK F, PENG Y C, ERIC J. Inheritance of resistance to Phomopsis seed decay in PI 360841 soybean. Journal of Heredity, 2008, 99(6): 588-592.

Related Articles 15

[1]	LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[2]	LIU FangDong, SUN Lei, WANG WuBin, ZHAO JinMing, GAI JunYi. Changes of Cropping System and Suggestions on Ecological Cultivation Regions of Soybeans in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 486-498.
[3]	CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong, WU CunXiang. Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
[4]	WU Qiong, XIE XiangTing, WANG Lei, MOU Yong, LI JinWei. Development and Validation of Event-Specific PCR Method for the Quantification of Genetically Modified Soybean DBN8205 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 29-40.
[5]	LIU LuPing, HU XueJie, QI Jin, CHEN Qiang, LIU Zhi, ZHAO TianTian, SHI XiaoLei, LIU BingQiang, MENG QingMin, ZHANG MengChen, HAN TianFu, YANG ChunYan. Cloning of the Promoters and Analysis of Expression Patterns of Maturity Genes E1 and E2 in Soybean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(5): 840-850.
[6]	ZHENG Yu, CHEN Yi, TI JinSong, SHI LongFei, XU XiaoBo, LI YuLin, GUO Rui. Evaluation of Carbon Footprint and Economic Benefit of Different Tobacco Rotation Patterns [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 733-747.
[7]	ZHANG Qi, XUE FuZhen, YANG XiuJie, JIANG SuYang, HUANG XueJuan, MA JiaYi, ZHANG ZheWen, XU JieFei. Study on the Function of Soybean Nicotinamide Enzyme GmNIC1 Gene Under Saline Alkali Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5128-5142.
[8]	MA HeXiao, GE GuoLong, ZHANG XiangQian, LU ZhanYuan, WANG ManXiu, RONG MeiRen, SHI JingJing, ZHANG DeJian, SUN XuePing. Effects of Different Crop Rotation Systems on Soil Readily Oxidized Organic Carbon and Carbon Pool Activity Differences [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5201-5215.
[9]	GAO ChunHua, ZHAO HaiJun, ZHAO FengTao, KONG WeiLin, JU FeiYan, LI ZongXin, SHI DeYang, LIU Ping. Effect of Growth Regulators on the Stem Characteristics and Yield of Summer Maize in Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4920-4935.
[10]	YANG ShuQi, ZHAO YingXing, QIAN Xin, ZHANG XuePeng, MENG WeiWei, SUI Peng, LI ZongXin, CHEN YuanQuan. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Maize-Soybean Intercropping Pattern in the Huang-Huai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4936-4951.
[11]	FANG Jian, QIN ZhaoJi, YU YuanYuan, YU NingNing, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, REN BaiZhao, ZHANG JiWang. Impacts of Varying Row Ratio Arrangements on Plant Performance, Stand Yield, and Comprehensive Benefits in Soybean-Maize Strip intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4841-4857.
[12]	SONG XuHui, ZHAO XueYing, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, ZHANG JiWang, LIU Peng, REN Hao. Effects of Row Ratio Allocation on Light Distribution and Photosynthetic Production Capacity of Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4858-4871.
[13]	SHI DeYang, GAO ChunHua, LI YanHong, ZHAO HaiJun, XIA DeJun. Effects of Row Spacing Configuration on the Canopy Characteristics and Grain Yield of the Intercropping Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4872-4885.
[14]	ZHANG MengYu, HE ZaiJu, WANG XingXing, REN Hao, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin. The Influences of Different Plant Height Combinations of Maize Varieties on Light Distribution in the Canopy and the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Maize Under Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping Pattern [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4886-4904.
[15]	KONG WeiLin, GAO ChunHua, ZHAO FengTao, JU FeiYan, LI ZongXin, ZHAO HaiJun, LIU Ping. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate Combined with Drip Irrigation Amount After Sowing on Yield, Economic Benefit, Water Use Characteristics of Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping Planting System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4905-4919.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

品种名称 Name of varieties	萌发时长 Germination time (h)
	0		48		72		96
	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率Decay rate (%)	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率 Decay rate (%)	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率Decay rate (%)	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率Decay rate (%)
Williams	64.0±13.4b	14.0±5.5b	50.0±15.8b	12.0±8.4b	68.0±14.8ab	70.0±7.1a	90.0±11.5a	72.5±9.6a
中作09-560 Zhongzuo 09-560	55.0±1.3ab	12.5±5.0b	46.0±8.90b	28.0±4.5ab	66.7±5.8a	25.0±5.7a	58.0±8.4ab	26.0±5.5ab
z13-631-2	82.50±9.6a	67.5±15.0a	46.7±15.3b	60.0±5.0ab	13.3±5.7c	53.3±5.8ab	60.0±8.9b	50.0±6.3b
ZDD26268	72.0±11.7a	21.7±14.7b	55.0±7.1ab	55.0±7.1a	43.3±20.8b	60.0±10.0a	12.0±4.5c	20.0±7.1b
辰溪青皮豆1 Chenxiqingpidou 1	72.5±9.6ab	57.5±9.6b	80.0±10.0a	74.0±8.9a	60.0±10.0b	63.3±5.8ab	60.0±8.2b	55.0±5.8b
通县黄豆 Tongxian huangdou	55.0±5.8a	15.0±5.8c	66.7±25.2a	73.3±11.5ab	56.0±15.20a	56.0±11.4a	45.0±10.0a	25.0±5.8bc
齐黄34 Qihuang 34	12.5±10.0a	10.0±5.8b	11.7±4.1a	15.0±5.5b	8.3±4.1a	15.0±5.5b	13.3±5.8a	41.7±9.6a

品种名称 Name of varieties	侵染时长 Infection time (h)
	24		48		72		96
	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率Decay rate (%)	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率Decay rate (%)	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率Decay rate (%)	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率Decay rate (%)
Williams	0.00c	0.00c	40.00±8.40b	40.00±5.50b	90.00±11.50a	72.50±9.60a	91.67±9.83a	83.30±7.53a
中作09-560 Zhongzuo 09-560	0.00c	0.00c	0.00c	0.00c	58.00±8.40b	26.00±5.50b	84.00±8.90a	50.00±12.20a
z13-631-2	0.00d	0.00d	18.00±4.70c	16.00±5.50c	60.00±8.94b	50.00±6.32b	95.00±5.48a	93.30±8.37a
ZDD26268	0.00c	16.00±5.50b	0.00c	16.70±5.20b	12.00±4.50b	20.00±7.10b	30.00±8.20a	35.00±5.80a
辰溪青皮豆1 Chenxiqingpidou 1	17.50±9.60b	0.00d	27.50±9.60b	17.50±9.60c	60.00±8.20a	55.00±5.80b	67.50±9.60a	70.00±14.10a
通县黄豆 Tongxian huangdou	0.00b	0.00c	0.00b	0.00c	45.00±10.00a	25.00±5.80b	47.50±9.60a	35.00±17.30a
齐黄34 Qihuang 34	0.00b	0.00c	0.00b	22.00±4.50b	13.30±5.80a	41.70±9.60a	0.00b	52.50±15.00a

抗性等级 Grade	品种数量Number	菌丝覆盖率Coverage rate (%)	种子腐烂率 Decay rate (%)	占比 Fraction (%)	菌丝覆盖率平均值±标准差 Mean±SD (%)	菌丝覆盖率变异系数 CV of coverage rate (%)	腐烂率平均值± 标准差 Mean±SD (%)	腐烂率变异系数 CV of decay rate (%)
Ⅰ级（高抗）HR	30	<80	0-30	17.65	24.00±28.40	118.30	17.00 ±12.00	70.59
Ⅱ级（中抗）MR	51	<80	31-60	30.00	24.51±20.98	85.60	49.80±9.22	18.51
Ⅲ级（中感）MS	71	<80	61-100	41.76	34.07±29.61	86.91	79.55±17.00	21.37
Ⅲ级（中感）MS	71	≥80	0-30	41.76	34.07±29.61	86.91	79.55±17.00	21.37
Ⅳ级（感病）S	4	≥80	31-60	2.35	96.25±4.78	4.97	54.00±4.78	8.85
Ⅴ级（高感）HS	14	≥80	61-100	8.23	93.00±7.00	7.53	89.64±13.65	15.23

Establishment of Evaluation System and Screening of Disease- Resistant Accessions for Phomopsis Seed Decay in Soybean Germination Stage

RichHTML

PDF