播期和种植密度对油菜产量和茎秆抗倒性的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.08.004

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Stem lodging is an important factor that restricts the increase of rapeseed production efficiency in China. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changing discipline and physiological mechanism of the lodging resistance of rapeseed stem treated with different sowing dates and densities, so as to provide theoretical and technical supports for high-yield and lodging resistance of rapeseed cultivation. 【Method】A split-plot experiment with two canola varieties (Huayouza 62 and Fengyou 520), two sowing dates (September 25, October 25) and four densities (15×10⁴, 30×10⁴, 45×10⁴, and 60×10⁴ plants/hm²)was performed to investigate yield and yield composition, stem mechanical strength, lodging index, microstructure, the main components of stem and key enzyme activities of lignin synthesis. 【Result】(1) At the sowing date of September 25 (T1), yield per plant, effective pods per plant and seeds per pod decreased with the density increased from 15×10⁴ hm^-2 to 60×10⁴ hm^-2, and the highest yield with the lowest lodging index was observed at density of 45×10⁴ hm^-2; Under the delayed the sowing date to October 25 (T2), the population yield, yield per plant, effective pods per plant and seeds per pod decreased significantly compared with those under T1, but the above-ground fresh weight decreased more significantly, resulting in the decrease of lodging index and the increase of lodging resistance under delayed sowing dates; (2)When sowing at the appropriate time, both the plant height and stem dry weight decreased significantly, while the lodging index was with a tendency of increasing firstly and then decreasing with increased densities, and the susceptible lodging part was transferred from the upper part to the base part of rapeseed stem. The parameters such as vascular bundle length/the thickness outside the pith and vascular bundle area/stem cross-sectional area gradually increased, and the content of lignin and cellulose of stem increased first and then decreased. With sowing dates delayed from September 25 to October 25, plant height, stem dry weight, stem lignin and cellulose content decreased significantly, but the above-ground fresh weight decreased more, resulting in the decreased lodging index. Stepwise regression analysis showed that lignin was the key index to improve the structure of the transport tissue, coordinate the lodging index and the population yield. The higher lignin content and the population lignin content of the stem could simultaneously obtain stronger lodging resistance of the stem and a higher population yield. (3) When the density increased from 15×10⁴ hm^-2 to 60×10⁴ hm^-2, the activities of peroxidase (POD), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and 4-coumaryl: CoA ligase (4CL) under T1 increased, and those decreased significantly with sowing date delayed from T1 to T2. 【Conclusion】Optimizing planting density under different sowing dates could significantly increase the population yield, and the decreased yield at the delayed sowing date could be compensated by increasing planting density. The ability of lignin synthesis enhanced, and the lignin content increased under delaying sowing dates with higher plant densities, and coordinated the contradiction between high yield and lodging resistance in rapeseed.

Key words: rapeseed, sowing date, planting density, lodging resistance, yield

YUAN Yuan,WANG Bo,ZHOU GuangSheng,LIU Fang,HUANG JunSheng,KUAI Jie. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Planting Densities on the Yield and Stem Lodging Resistance of Rapeseed[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1613-1626.

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Table 2

Effects of different sowing dates and planting densities on rapeseed yield and yield composition"

年份 Year	播期 Sowing date	品种 Variety	密度 Density	单株角果数 Effective pods per plant	每角粒数 Seeds per pod	千粒重 1000-seed weight (g)	单株产量 Yield per plant (g)	成株率 Survival rate (%)	实际产量 Yield (kg·hm^-2)
2017-2018	T1	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	315.0b	17.41a	3.68a	20.51a	93.60a	2742.3c
			D2	185.0ef	17.00ab	3.76a	11.82d	87.93bc	2901.0b
			D3	156.8gh	16.46bcd	3.60a	9.24e	84.22cd	3290.9a
			D4	103.7k	16.14cde	3.69a	6.11h	82.59de	2649.1cd
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	372.4a	16.88b	3.18bc	19.99a	93.53a	2555.7de
			D2	222.8d	16.58bcd	3.08bcd	11.39d	87.06bc	2939.5b
			D3	172.6fg	15.45fgh	3.13bcd	8.36f	81.57de	2731.0c
			D4	128.4ij	15.03h	3.04cde	7.03g	77.30fg	2625.9cde
	T2	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	262.9c	16.63bc	3.26b	14.25b	94.51a	1866.0i
			D2	171.8fg	16.17cde	3.23bc	8.96ef	88.57b	2261.0gh
			D3	141.7hi	15.88ef	3.19bc	7.19g	83.99cd	2467.1ef
			D4	106.9k	15.01h	3.19bc	5.12i	79.91ef	2484.9def
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	274.3c	16.07de	3.02cde	13.33c	96.94a	1857.7i
			D2	190.8e	15.66efg	2.92de	8.73ef	87.36bc	2203.5gh
			D3	154.9h	15.38fgh	2.94de	6.99g	79.94ef	2362.2fg
			D4	113.5jk	15.29gh	2.87e	4.99i	75.55g	2126.8h
2018-2019	T1	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	284.0b	16.26a	3.58c	17.19a	97.60a	2311.5c
			D2	173.6e	16.00ab	3.77ab	10.45b	93.10ab	2704.5ab
			D3	139.6g	15.77bcd	3.79a	8.28d	84.50c	2854.7a
			D4	96.1ij	15.49de	3.70b	5.52f	83.30c	2655.0b
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	312.6a	16.16a	3.30de	16.60a	95.20a	2113.5d
			D2	182.6de	15.80bcd	3.26ef	9.67bc	93.30ab	2660.3b
			D3	152.7fg	15.50de	3.29ef	7.75de	83.80c	2534.6b
			D4	102.3ij	15.34ef	3.21 f	5.06 fg	80.70 cde	2339.1 c
	T2	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	194.1 cd	16.04ab	3.21f	10.00bc	94.80a	1384.5h
			D2	141.4fg	15.95abc	3.24ef	7.31e	84.40c	1669.5fg
			D3	108.7hi	15.66cd	3.37d	5.74f	78.30def	1792.0ef
			D4	86.0j	15.06f	3.28ef	4.26gh	76.90ef	1932.7e
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	206.0c	15.73bcd	2.94g	9.39c	89.70b	1198.2i
			D2	157.4f	15.32ef	2.92g	7.05e	82.20cd	1514.6gh
			D3	123.4h	15.13f	2.98g	5.58f	77.30ef	1836.3ef
			D4	89.8j	14.74g	2.95g	3.90h	75.60f	1570.7g
方差分析Variance analyses
2017-2018			T	**	**	**	**	NS	**
			V	**	**	**	*	**	**
			D	**	**	NS	**	**	**
			T×V	**	*	**	NS	NS	NS
			T×D	**	NS	NS	**	NS	**
			V×D	**	NS	NS	*	*	**
			T×V×D	**	*	NS	NS	NS	**
2018-2019			T	**	**	**	**	**	**
			V	**	**	**	**	*	**
			D	**	**	**	**	**	**
			T×V	NS	*	**	NS	NS	NS
			T×D	**	NS	NS	**	*	**
			V×D	**	NS	**	NS	NS	*
			T×V×D	**	NS	NS	NS	NS	*

Table 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 3

Effects of different sowing dates and planting densities on main composition of rapeseed stem (%)"

年份 Year	播期 Sowing date	品种 Variety	密度 Density	酸不溶木质素 Acid insoluble lignin	酸溶木质素 Soluble lignin	总木质素 Total lignin	半纤维素 Hemicel lulose	纤维素 Cellulose	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar
2017-2018	T1	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	24.00bc	1.73abc	25.73abcd	19.03cde	34.74bc	3.44a
			D2	24.23abc	1.70abc	25.93abc	20.11b	36.00ab	3.24b
			D3	24.96a	1.57c	26.53a	21.13a	37.25a	3.05c
			D4	23.38cde	1.73abc	25.11cde	18.75def	35.98ab	3.40a
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	22.43fg	1.83ab	24.26fg	18.66def	32.78cd	3.29b
			D2	23.74bcd	1.80ab	25.54bcd	18.61def	34.84bc	3.11c
			D3	24.53ab	1.74abc	26.26ab	19.84bc	35.61ab	3.06c
			D4	23.78bcd	1.77ab	25.55bcd	19.33bcd	34.78bc	3.27b
	T2	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	21.84g	1.73abc	23.57g	16.96hi	29.14e	3.08c
			D2	22.72ef	1.72abc	24.43efg	17.56gh	30.89de	2.86e
			D3	24.03bc	1.68abc	25.71abcd	17.98fg	31.51d	2.71f
			D4	24.48ab	1.63bc	26.11ab	18.09efg	32.61d	2.68f
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	21.73g	1.87a	23.59g	16.91hi	22.32h	2.96d
			D2	22.32fg	1.82ab	24.14fg	17.22ghi	23.79gh	2.72f
			D3	23.08def	1.82ab	24.90def	16.301i	25.46fg	2.70f
			D4	23.36cde	1.81ab	25.17cde	17.95fg	27.09f	2.63f
2018-2019	T1	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	24.43b	2.03bcde	26.46b	18.32abc	27.97cd	5.50a
			D2	25.43a	1.99cdef	27.42a	18.90a	28.85bc	4.87c
			D3	25.66a	1.94efg	27.60a	19.25a	32.45a	4.06h
			D4	22.58cd	2.11ab	24.68cd	17.10defg	27.88cd	4.41f
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	20.96fgh	2.06abcd	23.02efg	17.38cdef	26.70de	4.96b
			D2	22.44cd	1.98def	24.42cd	18.10abcd	29.06bc	4.49e
			D3	23.20c	1.85gh	25.05c	18.36abc	30.59b	3.21l
			D4	21.22efg	2.01bcde	23.23ef	17.53bcde	28.96bc	4.33f
	T2	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	20.23hi	1.91fgh	22.14gh	17.44cde	26.36de	5.04b
			D2	21.17efgh	1.88gh	23.05efg	17.62bcde	26.75de	4.57d
			D3	22.04de	1.86gh	23.90de	18.21abcd	28.14cd	4.18g
			D4	23.40c	1.76i	25.16c	18.63ab	28.90bc	3.76j
		沣油520 FY 520	D1	19.73i	2.13a	21.87h	15.13h	23.71g	4.80c
			D2	20.55ghi	2.08abc	22.64fgh	16.15g	24.68fg	3.95i
			D3	21.84def	1.87gh	23.71de	16.30fg	26.01ef	3.43k
			D4	23.06c	1.84hi	24.90c	16.64efg	27.01de	3.36k
方差分析Variance analyses
2017-2018			T	**	NS	**	**	**	**
			V	**	**	**	**	**	**
			D	**	NS	**	**	**	**
			T×V	NS	NS	NS	NS	**	NS
			T×D	**	NS	**	**	*	**
			V×D	NS	NS	NS	**	NS	*
			T×V×D	**	NS	**	NS	NS	NS
2018-2019			T	**	**	**	**	**	**
			V	**	**	**	**	**	**
			D	**	**	**	**	**	**
			T×V	**	**	**	**	**	NS
			T×D	**	**	**	**	**	**
			V×D	NS	**	NS	NS	NS	**
			T×V×D	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	**

Table 3

Fig. 4

Table 4

Fig. 5

References 32

[1]	刘成, 冯中朝, 肖唐华, 马晓敏, 周广生, 黄凤洪, 李加纳, 王汉中. 我国油菜产业发展现状、潜力及对策. 中国油料作物学报, 2019,41(4):485-489.
	LIU C, FENG Z C, XIAO T H, MA X M, ZHOU G S, HUANG F H, LI J N, WANG H Z. Development, potential and adaptation of Chinese rapeseed industry. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2019,41(4):485-489. (in Chinese)
[2]	蒯婕, 孙盈盈, 左青松, 廖庆喜, 冷锁虎, 程雨贵, 曹石, 吴江生, 周广生. 机械收获模式下直播冬油菜密度与行距的优化. 作物学报, 2016,42(6):898-908.
	KUAI J, SUN Y Y, ZUO Q S, LIAO Q X, LENG S H, CHENG Y G, CAO S, WU J S, ZHOU G S. Optimization of plant density and row spacing for mechanical harvest inwinter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016,42(6):898-908. (in Chinese)
[3]	蒯婕, 王积军, 左青松, 陈红琳, 高建芹, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 长江流域直播油菜密植效应及其机理研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(24):4625-4632.
	KUAI J, WANG J J, ZUO Q S, CHEN H L, GAO J Q, WANG B, ZHOU G S, FU T D. Effects and mechanism of higher plant density on directly-sown rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(24):4625-4632. (in Chinese)
[4]	BERRY P M, SPINK J H, GAY A P, CRAIGON J. A comparison of root and stem lodging risks among winter wheat cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2003,141:191-202.
[5]	雷小龙, 刘利, 刘波, 黄光忠, 马荣朝, 任万军. 杂交籼稻F优498机械化种植的茎秆理化性状与抗倒伏性. 中国水稻科学, 2014,28(6):612-620.
	LEI X L, LIU L, LIU B, HUANG G Z, MA R C, REN W J. Physical and chemical characteristics and lodging resistance of culm of indica hybrid rice F you 498 under mechanical planting. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014,28(6):612-620. (in Chinese)
[6]	吴莲蓉. 油菜茎秆生化成分和倒伏相关性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2015.
	WU L R. Study on the stem biochemical components in rapeseed and their relationship with lodging characters[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[7]	李华英. 种植密度和播期对冬小麦籽粒产量和抗倒性能的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
	LI H Y. Effects of plant density and sowing date on grain yieldand lodging resistance of winter wheat[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[8]	BHAGAT K P, SAIRAM R K, DESHMUKH P S, KUSHWAHA S R. Biochemical analysis of stem in lodging tolerant and susceptible wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under normal and late sown conditions. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2011,16:68-74.
[9]	TANAKA K, MURATA K, YAMAZAKI M, ONOSATO K, MIYAO A, HIROCHIKA H. Three distinct rice cellulose synthase catalytic subunit genes required for cellulose synthesis in the secondary wall. Plant Physiology, 2003,133:78-83.
[10]	LI X Y, ZUO Q S, CHANG H B, BAI G P, KUAI J, ZHOU G S. Higher density planting benefits mechanical harvesting of rapeseed in the Yangtze River basin of China. Field Crops Research, 2018,218:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.013
[11]	孙盈盈. 不同栽培措施对油菜产量及抗倒性的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
	SUN Y Y. Effect of different cultivation measures on rapeseed yieldand lodging resistance[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[12]	李小勇, 周敏, 王涛, 张兰, 周广生, 蒯婕. 种植密度对油菜机械收获关键性状的影响. 作物学报, 2018,44(2):278-287.
	LI X Y, ZHOU M, WANG T, ZHANG L, ZHOU G S, KUAI J. Effects of planting density on the mechanical harvesting characteristics of semi-winter rapeseed. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018,44(2):278-287. (in Chinese)
[13]	CROOK M J, ENNOS A R. The effect of nitrogen and growth regulators on stem and root characteristics associated with lodging in two cultivars of winter wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1995,46(289):931-938.
[14]	LI X J, LI S Y, LIN J X. Effect of GA₃ spraying on lignin and auxin contents and the correlated enzyme activities in bayberry (Myrica rubra Bieb.) during flower-bud induction. Plant Science, 2003,164:549-556. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00004-9
[15]	赵小红, 白羿雄, 王凯, 姚有华, 姚晓华, 吴昆仑. 种植密度对2个青稞品种抗倒伏及秸秆饲用特性的影响. 作物学报, 2020,46(4):586-595.
	ZHAO X H, BAI Y X, WANG K, YAO Y H, YAO X H, WU K L. Effects of planting density on lodging resistance and straw forage characteristics in two hulless barley varieties. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020,46(4):586-595. (in Chinese)
[16]	VANHOLME R, MORREEL K, RALPH J, BOERJAN W. Lignin engineering. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2008,11:278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.03.005 pmid: 18434238
[17]	汪灿, 阮仁武, 袁晓辉, 胡丹, 杨浩, 林婷婷, 何沛龙, 李燕, 易泽林. 荞麦茎秆解剖结构和木质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系. 作物学报, 2014,40(10):1846-1856.
	WANG C, RUAN R W, YUAN X H, HU D, YANG H, LIN T T, HE P L, LI Y, YI Z L. Relationship of anatomical structure and lignin metabolism with lodging resistance of culm in buckwheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014,40(10):1846-1856. (in Chinese)
[18]	束红梅, 赵新华, 周治国, 郑密, 王友华. 不同棉花品种纤维比强度形成的温度敏感性差异机理研究. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(7):2332-2341.
	SHU H M, ZHAO X H, ZHOU Z G, ZHENG M, WANG Y H. Physiological mechanisms of variation in temperature-sensitivity of cotton fiber strength formation between two cotton cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009,42(7):2332-2341. (in Chinese)
[19]	SONG X, LIU F L, ZHENG P Y, ZHANG X K, LU G Y, FU G P, CHENG Y. Correlation analysis between agronomic traits and yield of rapeseed (Brassica napusL.) for high-density planting. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010,43(9):1800-1806.
[20]	OZER H. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 2003,19(3):453-463.
[21]	MATINFAR M, MATINFAR M, MAHJOOR M, SHIRANI RAD A H, MAHMODI R. Effect of plant density on yield and yield seed components of rapeseed (Brassica napus) cultivars. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 2013,6(4):405-414.
[22]	LI H G, CHENG X, ZHANG L P, HU J H, ZHANG F G, CHEN B Y, XU K, GAO G Z, LI H, LI L X, HUANG Q, LI Z Y, YAN G X, WU X M. An integration of genome-wide association study and gene co-expression network analysis identifies candidate genes of stem lodging-related traits in Brassica napus. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018,9:796. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00796 pmid: 29946333
[23]	KATAHIRA R, SLUITER J B, SCHELL D J, DAVIS M F. Degradation of carbohydrates during dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment can interfere with lignin measurements in solid residues. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013,61(13):3286-3292. pmid: 23428141
[24]	PEI Y J, LI Y Y, ZHANG Y B, YU C B, FU T D, ZOU J, TU Y Y, PENG L C, CHEN P. G-lignin and hemicellulosic monosaccharides distinctively affect biomass digestibility in rapeseed. Bioresour Technol, 2016,203:325-333. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.072 pmid: 26748046
[25]	周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 朱旭彤. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测. 中国农业科学, 2003,36(11):1378-1382.
	ZHOU G S, MEI F Z, ZHOU Z Q, ZHU X T. Comprehensive evaluation and forecast on physiological indices of waterlogging resistance of different wheat varieties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003,36(11):1378-1382. (in Chinese)
[26]	吕丽华, 陶洪斌, 夏来坤, 张雅杰, 赵明, 赵久然, 王璞. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性. 作物学报, 2008,34(3):447-455.
	LÜ L H, TAO H B, XIA L K, ZHANG Y J, ZHAO M, ZHAO J R, WANG P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis traits of summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,34(3):447-455. (in Chinese)
[27]	胡焕焕, 刘丽平, 李瑞奇, 李慧玲, 李雁鸣. 播种期和密度对冬小麦品种河农822产量形成的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2008,28(3):490-495.
	HU H H, LIU L P, LI R Q, LI H L, LI Y M. Effect of sowing date and planting density on the yield formation of a winter wheat cultivar Henong 822. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2008,28(3):490-495. (in Chinese)
[28]	LIU W G, DENG Y C, HUSSAIN S, ZOU J L, YUAN J, LUO L, YANG C Y, YUAN X Q, YANG W Y. Relationship between cellulose accumulation and lodging resistance in the stem of relay intercropped soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Field Crops Research, 2016,196:261-267.
[29]	崔海岩, 靳立斌, 李波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 董树亭, 刘鹏. 遮阴对夏玉米茎秆形态结构和倒伏的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(17):3497-3505.
	CUI H Y, JIN L B, LI B, ZHANG J W, ZHAO B, DONG S T, LIU P. Effects of shading on stalks morphology, structure and lodging of summer maize in field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(17):3497-3505. (in Chinese)
[30]	佘恒志, 聂姣, 李英双, 刘星贝, 胡丹, 马珊, 次仁卓嘎, 汪灿, 吴东倩, 阮仁武, 易泽林. 不同抗倒伏能力甜荞品种茎秆木质素及其单体合成特征. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(7):1202-1209.
	SHE H Z, NIE J, LI Y S, LIU X B, HU D, MA S, CIREN Z G, WANG C, WU D Q, RUAN R W, YI Z L. Lignin and lignin monomer synthetic characteristics of culm incommon buckwheat with different lodging resistance capabilities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(7):1202-1209. (in Chinese)
[31]	卢昆丽, 尹燕枰, 王振林, 李勇, 彭佃亮, 杨卫兵, 崔正勇, 杨东清, 江文文. 施氮期对小麦茎秆木质素合成的影响及其抗倒伏生理机制. 作物学报, 2014,40(9):1686-1694.
	LU K L, YIN Y P, WANG Z L, LI Y, PENG D L, YANG W B, CUI Z Y, YANG D Q, JIANG W W. Effect of nitrogen fertilization timing on lignin synthesis of stem and physiological mechanism of lodging resistance in wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014,40(9):1686-1694. (in Chinese)
[32]	师恭曜. 甘蓝型油菜茎秆抗倒伏性构成因素的鉴定与评价[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2010: 27-31.
	SHI G Y. Characterization and evaluation of stem lodging resistance in rapeseed (Brassica Campestris L.)[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2010: 27-31. (in Chinese)

Related Articles 15

[1]	PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2^# and Changbai7^# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	ZHU Qi, JIA ZhenPeng, Tahir SHAH, XU ChenSheng, LI ZhiQi, LÜ HuiShuai, ZHU PengChao, WEI XiaoMin, HUANG DongLin, SUN YanNi, CAO WeiDong, GAO YaJun, WANG ZhaoHui, ZHANG DaBin. Green Manure Crops Combined with Enhanced-Efficiency Products Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Carbon Footprints in Dryland Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1507-1522.
[3]	WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[4]	WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[5]	ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[6]	HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[7]	LIU HaiQing, JIN JiaoJiao, SUN WanCang, CHAI Peng, QI WeiLiang, YANG Gang, LI Chan, LUO XueMei, SU YunYun, QIN XueXue. Morphogenesis of the Low-Growth Point and Its Multi-Hormonal Regulatory Mechanism During Overwintering in Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 951-966.
[8]	HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[9]	GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[10]	YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[11]	YANG Rui, CHEN JingDong, HUANG Ying, XIE LingLi, ZHANG XueKun, ZHOU DengWen, LIU QingYun, XU JinSong, XU BenBo. Genetic Improvement and Configuration Analysis of High-Yield Rapeseed Lines in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 250-264.
[12]	CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[13]	CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong, WU CunXiang. Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
[14]	ZHANG ZhiYong, TAN ShiChao, XIONG ShuPing, MA XinMing, WEI YiHao, WANG XiaoChun. Effects of Annual Water and Nitrogen Optimization on Yield and Nitrogen Migration of Wheat-Maize Rotation System in Irrigation Area of Northern Henan [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 336-353.
[15]	LÜ XuDong, SUN ShiYuan, LI YaNan, LIU YuLong, WANG YanQun, FU Xin, ZHANG JiaYing, NING Peng, PENG ZhengPing. Effects of Intelligent Mechanized Layered Fertilization on Root-Soil Nutrient Distribution and Yield in Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 129-146.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

播期 Sowing date	品种 Variety	密度 Density	2017-2018			2018-2019
播期 Sowing date	品种 Variety	密度 Density	生育期 Growth days (d)	有效积温 Effective accumulated temperature (℃)	降雨量 Rainfall (mm)	生育期 Growth days (d)	有效积温 Effective accumulated temperature (℃)	降雨量 Rainfall (mm)
T1	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	218	2772.2	207.3	218	2669.9	492.8
		D2	216	2727.5	207.3	216	2623.5	492.8
		D3	214	2678.6	206.3	214	2581.4	492.8
		D4	213	2653.4	206.3	213	2564.0	492.8
	沣油520 FY 520	D1	210	2586.1	206.1	210	2519.2	449.5
		D2	208	2548.0	206.1	208	2478.0	449.5
		D3	206	2516.1	199.3	206	2433.3	449.5
		D4	205	2494.2	181.8	205	2415.4	448.4
T2	华油杂62 HZ 62	D1	191	2318.3	183.0	193	2010.4	475.9
		D2	189	2275.3	180.0	192	1974.8	453.1
		D3	188	2254.8	180.0	191	1949.8	453.1
		D4	187	2234.6	180.0	190	1927.4	453.1
	沣油520 FY 520	D1	185	2195.1	144.2	187	1995.8	474.7
		D2	184	2172.7	144.2	186	1955.9	474.7
		D3	183	2150.4	144.2	185	1933.3	474.7
		D4	182	2126.3	144.2	184	1909.2	474.7

播期 Sowing date	因变量 Dependent variable	自变量 Independent variable	回归系数 Regression coefficients	校准误 Calibration error	标准系数 Standard coefficient	显著性Saliency
播期 Sowing date	因变量 Dependent variable	自变量 Independent variable	回归系数 Regression coefficients	校准误 Calibration error	标准系数 Standard coefficient	T	P
T1	倒伏指数 Lodging index	酸溶木质素soluble lignin	0.412	0.124	0.414	3.334	0.002
	倒伏指数 Lodging index	总木质素Total lignin	-0.042	0.016	-0.328	-2.643	0.011
	小区产量 Yield	群体可溶性糖Group soluble sugar	-2.399	0.382	-0.654	-6.283	0.000
	小区产量 Yield	群体总木质素Group total lignin	0.670	0.085	0.821	7.889	0.000
T2	倒伏指数 Lodging index	酸溶木质素soluble lignin	-0.078	0.013	-0.636	-6.226	0.000
	倒伏指数 Lodging index	总木质素Total lignin	0.285	0.105	0.278	2.721	0.009
	小区产量 Yield	群体总木质素Group total lignin	1.144	0.071	1.001	16.074	0.000
	小区产量 Yield	群体可溶性糖Group soluble sugar	-3.392	0.643	-0.329	-5.274	0.000

Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Planting Densities on the Yield and Stem Lodging Resistance of Rapeseed

RichHTML

PDF