Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (13): 2532-2540.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.13.002

• THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC RESTORATION OF DEGRADED GRASSLAND • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Systematic Restoration for Degraded Grasslands: Concept, Mechanisms and Approaches

WANG DeLi1,WANG Ling1,XIN XiaoPing2,LI LingHao3,TANG HuaJun2()   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education/School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024
    2Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
    3State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
  • Received:2019-11-06 Accepted:2020-02-19 Online:2020-07-01 Published:2020-07-16
  • Contact: HuaJun TANG E-mail:hjtang@mail.caas.net.cn

Abstract:

Grasslands occupying the most terrestrial land surface display multiple functions. The long-term overgrazing of livestock often occur, and additional climate changes brings about the negative effects on the ecological stability, and therefore, grassland degradation is worldwide prevailing, which reduce the multiple functions of grasslands, and how to restore those degraded grasslands remains a crucial challenge for the human beings. For the past several decades, most researches on grassland restoration have focused on restoration practice rather than underlying theoretical basis, and the general restoration theory is lacking. Consequently, it is hard to have a practical solution for degraded grasslands due to lack of the available techniques. In this paper, the authors summarize the previous grassland restoration theories or models from restoration succession trajectory to the threshold model, the alternative state model and the filter model. A new concept, named as “systematic restoration for degraded grasslands” is put forward, which emphasizes three dimensions as key structure components (trophic species and dominant species of plant-animal-microbe), self-organized processes (water-nutrient coupling, linkage between aboveground and belowground), and multi-functionality (synergy and stability of grassland multiple functions), and also give the further explanations for contexts and mechanisms of the grassland systematic restoration (GSR): system structure integration, self-organization of ecological processes, and multi-functionality. Generally, the target of grassland restoration is approaching to the climax community or primordial state of ecosystem. The authors here emphasize the restoration of system self-organization, resulting from the interactions among the species like plant-soil feedback, as well as grassland multiple functions (goods and ecological services)characterized by their synergism and coupling. At last, the authors discuss the potential restoration practices like natural restoration by fencing and resting, intervening restoration with artificial inputs, and stimulating restoration with utilizing such as grazing and cutting, and perhaps the latter is the feasible mean for practical grassland restoration. The restoration mechanisms and practices for degraded grasslands are more complicated than thought, and here we attempt to establish a comprehensive conceptual framework to provide a new insight into grassland restoration theory. Certainly, it needs more evidence and experiments to enrich this new concept, GSR.

Key words: grasslands, degradation, restoration, systematic restoration, trophic, ecological process

Fig. 1

Diagram of ecological restoration theory or models"

Fig. 2

Conceptual framework of systematic restoration for degraded grasslands"

[1] WANG D L, WANG L, LIU J S, ZHU H, ZHONG Z W. Grassland ecology in China: Perspectives and challenges. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2018,5(1):24-43.
[2] 唐华俊, 辛晓平, 李凌浩, 王德利, 闫玉春, 周延林, 王明玖, 周道玮, 崔国文, 李向林, 闫瑞瑞, 陈宝瑞, 徐丽君, 王旭. 北方草甸退化草地治理技术与示范. 生态学报, 2016,36(22):7034-7039.
TANG H J, XIN X P, LI L H, WANG D L, YAN Y C, ZHOU Y L, WANG M J, ZHOU D W, CUI G W, LI X L, YAN R R, CHEN B R, XU L J, WANG X. North meadow degraded grassland treatment technology and demonstration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(22) :7034-7039. (in Chinese)
[3] 王德利, 杨利民. 草地生态与管理利用. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004.
WANG D L, YANG L M. Grassland Ecology and Management Utilization. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004. (in Chinese)
[4] 王德利, 郭继勋. 松嫩盐碱化草地的恢复理论与技术. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
WANG D L, GUO J X. Restoration Theory and Technology of Songnen Saline-Alkaline Grassland. Beijing: Science Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
[5] 王德利, 吕新龙, 罗为东. 不同放牧密度对草原被特征的影响分析. 草业学报, 1996,5(2):28-33.
WANG D L, LV X L, LUO W D. Analysis to effects of different grazing density on characteristics of rangeland vegetation. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1996,5(2):28-33. (in Chinese)
[6] JORDAN W R, GILPIN M E, ABER J D. Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research London: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[7] PARKERV T. The scale of successional models and restoration objectives. Restoration Ecology, 1997,5(4):301-306.
[8] 郑慧莹, 李建东. 松嫩平原盐生植被与盐碱化草地恢复. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
ZHENG H Y, LI J D. Restoration of Saline Vegetation and Saline- Alkaline Grassland in Songnen Plain. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. (in Chinese)
[9] ANDERSON R C, SCHWEGMAN J E, ANDERSON M R. Micro- scale restoration: A 25-year history of a southern Illinois barrens. Restoration Ecology, 2000,8(3):296-306.
[10] MAY R M. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 1977,269(5628):471-477.
[11] BRISKE D D, FUHLENDORF S D, SMEINS F E. A unified framework for assessment and application of ecological thresholds. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2006,59(3):225-236.
[12] WHISENANT S G. Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process- Orientated, Landscape-Scale Approach. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[13] CONNELL J H, SOUSA W P. On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. The American Naturalist, 1983,121(6):789-824.
[14] SUDING K N, HOBBS R J. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: A developing framework. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009,24(5):271-279.
[15] HULVEY K B, AIGNER P A. Using filter-based community assembly models to improve restoration outcomes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014,51(4):997-1005.
[16] 董世魁, 刘世梁, 邵新庆, 黄晓霞. 恢复生态学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009.
DONG S K, LIU S L, SHAO X Q, HUANG X X. Restoration Ecology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
[17] LI X F, ZHONG Z W, SANDERS D, SMIT C, WANG D L, NUMMI P, ZHU Y, WANG L, ZHU H, NAZIM H. Reciprocal facilitation between large herbivores and ants in a semi-arid grassland. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2018,285(1888):20181665.
[18] WUBS E R J, BEZEMER T M. Plant community evenness responds to spatial plant-soil feedback heterogeneity primarily through the diversity of soil conditioning. Functional Ecology, 2018,32(2):509-521.
[19] HECTOR A, BAGCHI1 R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature, 2007,448:188-191.
[20] 王德利, 王岭. 草地管理概念的新释义. 科学通报, 2019,64(11):1106-1113.
WANG D L, WANG L. A new perspective on the concept of grassland management. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019,64(11):1106-1113. (in Chinese)
[21] 呼格吉勒图, 杨劼, 宝音陶格涛, 包青海. 不同干扰对典型草地群落物种多样性和生物量的影响. 草业学报, 2009,18(3):6-11.
HUGE J L T, YANG J, BAOYIN T G T, BAO Q H. Effects of different disturbances on species diversity and biomass of community in the typical steppe. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009,18(3):6-11. (in Chinese)
[22] HU Z M, LI S G, GUO Q, NIU S L, HE N P, LI L H, YU G R. A synthesis of the effect of grazing exclusion on carbon dynamics in grasslands in China. Global Change Biology, 2016,22, 1385-1393.
[23] 张宝田, 王德利. 移栽羊草改良松嫩平原碱斑方法的研究. 东北师大学报, 2009,41(3):97-100.
ZHANG B T, WANG D L. A technique of rapidly restoring alkali- steppe with directly cultivating Leymus chinensis on the Songnen Plains. Journal of Northeast Normal University, 2009,41(3):97-100. (in Chinese)
[24] 黄立华, 梁正伟. 不同叶龄及灌水方式对重度盐碱地羊草移栽成活率的影响. 中国草地学报, 2010,32(2):32-36.
HUANG L H, LIANG Z W. Effect of leaf ages and irrigation ways on survival rate of Leymus chinensis transplanted in heavy saline-alkaline land. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2010,32(2):32-36. (in Chinese)
[25] RUIZ-LOZANO J M, PORCEL R, AZCON C, AROCA R. Regulation by arbuscular mycorrhizae of the integrated physiological response to salinity in plants: New challenges in physiological and molecular studies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002,63:4033-4044.
[26] LIU C, WANG L, SONG X X, CHANG Q, FRANK D A, WANG D L, LI J, LIN H J, DU F Y. Towards a mechanistic understanding of the effect that different species of large grazers have on grassland soil N availability. Journal of Ecology, 2018,106(1):357-366.
[27] GAO Y, WANG D L, BA L, BAI Y G, LIU B. Interactions between herbivory and resource availability on grazing tolerance of Leymus chinensis. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008,63(1/3):113-122.
[28] LIU J S, WANG L, WANG D L, BONSER S P, SUN F, ZHOU Y F, GAO Y, TENG X. Plants can benefit from herbivory: Stimulatory effects of sheep saliva on growth of Leymus chinensis. PLoS ONE, 2012,7(1):e29259.
[29] LIU J, FENG C, WANG D L, WANG L, WILSEY J, BRIAN , ZHONG Z W. Impacts of grazing by different large herbivores in grassland depend on plant species diversity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,52:1053-1062.
[30] WANG L, DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M, WANG D L, ISBELL F, LIU J, FENG C, LIU J S, ZHONG Z W, ZHU H, YUAN X, CHANG Q, LIU C. Diversifying livestock promotes multidiversity and multifunctionality in managed grasslands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2019,116(13):6187-6192.
[1] FENG Chen,FENG LiangShan,LIU Qi,LI HaoRu,ZHENG JiaMing,YANG Ning,BAI Wei,ZHANG Zhe,SUN ZhanXiang. The Degradation Characteristics of Different Plastic Films and Their Effects on Maize Yield in Semi-Arid Area in Western Liaoning [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1869-1880.
[2] WANG Bing,LI HuiMin,CAO HaiQun,WANG GuiRong. Mechanisms and Applications of Plant-Herbivore-Natural Enemy Tritrophic Interactions Mediated by Volatile Organic Compounds [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1653-1672.
[3] YAN RuiRui, GAO Wa, SHEN BeiBei, ZHANG Yu, WANG Miao, ZHU XiaoYu, XIN XiaoPing. Index System for Quantitative Evaluation of Pasture Degradation in Meadow Grassland of Inner Mongolia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3343-3354.
[4] Na JIANG,DongMei SHI,GuangYi JIANG,Ge SONG,ChengJing SI,Qing YE. Effects of Soil Erosion on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Cultivated Layer of Purple Soil Slope Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(9): 1845-1859.
[5] WANG WenXin,WANG WenLong,GUO MingMing,WANG TianChao,KANG HongLiang,YANG Bo,ZHAO Man,CHEN ZhuoXin. Effects of Natural Vegetation Restoration on Characteristics of Soil Aggregate and Soil Erodibility of Gully Heads in Gully Region of the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(16): 2845-2857.
[6] QIU CunPu, CHEN XiaoFen, LIU Ming, LI WeiTao, WU Meng, JIANG ChunYu, FENG YouZhi, LI ZhongPei. Microbial Transformation Process of Straw-Derived C in Two Typical Paddy Soils [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(13): 2268-2279.
[7] YU HaiLong, LI ZhiYuan, YANG LiMei, LIU YuMei, ZHUANG Mu, Lü HongHao, LI ZhanSheng, FANG ZhiYuan, ZHANG YangYong. Development of Fertility-Restored BC3 Progenies in Ogura CMS Chinese Kale and Analysis on Gene Transmission Rate of Rfo and Genetic Background [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(9): 1746-1757.
[8] WEI XinYan, HUANG YuanYuan, HUANG YaLi, DU KeJiu. Antagonism of Bacillus methylotrophicus Strain BH21 to Botrytis cinerea [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 883-892.
[9] JI Cheng, JIA Ru, ZHAO LiHong. Application of Gene Engineering Technique in Aflatoxin Biodegradation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(17): 3422-3428.
[10] CHEN Li-juan, LI Xin, LI Zheng, LI Pei-di, LI Zhong-wen, ZHANG De-quan. Protein Phosphorylation on the Function of Myofibrillar Proteins in Mutton Muscle [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(7): 1360-1370.
[11] SONG Hui-fang, LI Ying-long, MA En-bo, ZHANG Jian-zhen. The Heterogenous Expression and Enzymatic Characteristics of β-N-acetylglucosaminidase from Locusta migratoria [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(21): 4140-4148.
[12] HOU Xiang-yang. Priority Approaches, Techniques and Models to Sustainably Tap the Grassland Productivity Potential [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(16): 3229-3238.
[13] ZHONG Ping, CHEN Pu-rui, WANG Qian, XIAO Fu-liang, ZHANG Kuan, MA Fu-rong, HUANG Mei-ling, WANG Ping-rong, DENG Xiao-jian, SUN Chang-hui. Genetic Analysis and Candidate Gene Identification of the Panicle Degradation Mutant spd11 in Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(10): 1835-1843.
[14] CHEN Zeng-long, CHEN Xiu, DONG Feng-shou, LIU Xin-gang, XU Jun, ZHENG Yong-quan. Chiral Stability of Dinotefuran in Organic Solvents and Water [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(9): 1756-1763.
[15] YAN Du-jian, ZHOU Qi-wu, LU Hao, WU Chen-chen, ZHAO Bao-yu, CAO Dan-dan, MA Feng, LIU Xiao-xue. The Disaster, Ecological Distribution and Control of Poisonous Weeds in Natural Grasslands of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(3): 565-582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!