Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (13): 2513-2523.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.13.007

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Cause of Influence of Spray Volume on Control Effect of Pesticide Unit Dose in Rice Fields

GU ZhongYan, XU DeJin, XU GuangChun   

  1. Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014
  • Received:2018-01-15 Online:2018-07-01 Published:2018-07-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between the spray volume in rice fields and retention on rice plants, understand the mechanism affecting the control effect of pesticide unit dose, and to provide a basis for the scientific use of pesticides. 【Method】 the liquid retention on unit area of ??rice was measured under spraying conditions, the change of the liquid retention indicated the point of run-off and maximum retention of the liquid on rice leaves. The surface tension of the liquid was measured by the method according to the GB/T 5549-2010, and the critical micelle concentration of the surfactant solution was determined by using the law of the surface tension varying with the concentration of the surfactant. The zisman method was used to measure the critical surface tension of rice leaves. The key factors affecting the leaf capacity of rice leaves were analyzed. By simulating chlorantraniliprole control of rice leaf roller(Cnaphalocrocis medinalis), pymetrozine and chlorpyrifos control of brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) in a spray tower, the relationship between spray volume and droplet density and the effect of pesticide unit dosage on control effect against pests were also investigated. 【Result】 With the increase of the spray volume, the liquid holding capacity of rice leaves increased. After reaching the maximum value, the liquid began to lose and then it decreased to a stable value and no longer changed. The final liquid holding capacity was only 50% of the maximum value. The critical surface tension of the tested rice leaves was 29.90-31.22 mN·m-1, which meant the tested surface was a low-energy surface. The surface tension of clear water was 71.8 mN·m-1, which was greater than the critical surface tension of the tested surface. The surface tension of tested rice leaves limited the liquid holding capacity of the leaves. With the additives TX-10 and Silwet-408, the surface tension of the liquid was less than the critical surface tension of rice, which increased the liquid holding capacity of the rice leaves. When the auxiliary agent reached the critical micelle concentration, TX-10 and Silwet-408 provided the best results. The amount of liquid spray affected the density of spray droplets, thus affecting the control effect of pesticide unit dose. When the droplet volume median diameter was 200 μm, the amount of liquid medicine 150 L·hm-2 was less than 10 drops/cm2. The control effect of three effective doses 20, 25 and 30 g of chlorantraniliprole against C. medinalis was less than 60%. The liquid droplet volume 450 L·hm-2 had less than 40 drops/cm2. The control effect of three effective doses against C. medinalis was 56.92%, 62.86% and 65.07%, respectively. The liquid droplet volume 900 L·hm-2 was 82 drops/cm2, the three effective doses of chlorantraniliprole had the best control effect on C. medinalis, which was over 70%. Reducing the droplet volume median diameter and increasing the amount of droplets of unit volume of liquid could reduce the amount of liquid spray. When the diameter of droplets was 75 μm and the liquid volume was 450 L·hm-2, the droplets were 140 drops/cm2 and the control effect of chlorantraniliprole against C. medinalis had no significant difference with 200 μm droplet diameter and 900 L·hm-2 liquid volume. Because of the barrier of rice canopy, the droplets number under the canopy was very few when spraying on the longitudinal surface of rice. When the droplet volume median diameter was 200 μm and the spray liquid volume was 900 L·hm-2 or the droplet volume median diameter was 75 μm and the spray liquid volume was 450 L·hm-2, the amount of droplets under the canopy were less than 20 drops/cm2, the pesticides had poor control effect on the N. lugens. Under the canopy spray, pesticides were sprayed directly on the infestation sites of the N. lugens, and the control effect of the pymetrozine and chlorpyrifos unit doses on the N. lugens was significantly improved. 【Conclusion】 The amount of liquid used affects the amount of pesticides deposited on rice plants and the density of droplets per unit area of rice, thus affecting the control effect of pesticide unit doses on pests. When the liquid volume was 450 L·hm-2 (droplet diameter 75 μm) or 900 L·hm-2 (droplet diameter 200 μm), the canopy was evenly sprayed up and down in rice fields, which ensured that the liquid retention on rice plant was within the range of the point of run-off and had a sufficient density of droplets, the control effect of pesticide against pests was good.

Key words: pesticide, spraying volume, point of run-off, retention, droplet density, control effect

[1]    张帅, 邵振润, 沈晋良, 龙丽萍. 加强水稻主要病虫科学用药防控的原则和措施. 农药, 2011, 50(11): 855-857.
Zhang S, Shao Z R, Shen J L, Long L P. Emphasis on fundamental principle and measures of scientific control towards main pests and diseases of rice. Agrochemicals, 2011, 50(11): 855-857. (in Chinese)
[2]    Wirth W, Storp S, Jacobsen W. Mechanisms controlling leaf retention of agricultural spray solutions. Pesticide Science, 1991, 33(4): 411-420.
[3]    Foqué D, Pieters J G, Nuyttens D. Effect of spray angle and spray volume on deposition of a medium droplet spray with support in ivy pot plants. Pest Management Science, 2014, 70(3): 427-439.
[4]    Garcerá C, Moltó E, Chueca P. Factors influencing the efficacy of two organophosphate insecticides in controlling California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell). A basis for reducing spray application volume in Mediterranean conditions. Pest Management Science, 2014, 70(1): 28-38.
[5]    Ebert T A, Taylor R A J, Downer R A, Hall F R. Deposit structure and efficacy of pesticide application. 1: Interactions between deposit size, toxicant concentration and deposit number. Pesticide Science, 1999, 55(8): 783-792.
[6]    Ebert T A, Taylor R A J, Downer R A, Hall F R. Deposit structure and efficacy of pesticide application. 2: Trichoplusia ni control on cabbage with fipronil. Pesticide Science, 1999, 55(8): 793-798.
[7]    Ebert T A, Downer R A. A different look at experiments on pesticide distribution. Crop protection, 2006, 25(4): 299-309.
[8]    袁会珠, 齐淑华, 杨代斌. 药液在作物叶片的流失点和最大稳定持留量研究. 农药学学报, 2000, 2(4): 66-71.
Yuan H Z, Qi S H, Yang D B. Study on the point of run-off and the maximum retention of spray liquid on crop leaves. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2000, 2(4): 66-71. (in Chinese)
[9]    袁会珠, 杨代斌, 闫晓静, 张琳娜. 农药有效利用率与喷雾技术优化. 植物保护, 2011, 37(5): 14-20.
Yuan H Z, Yang D B, Yan X J, Zhang L N. Pesticide efficiency and the way to optimize the spray application. Plant Protection, 2011, 37(5): 14-20. (in Chinese)
[10]   Xu L Y, Zhu H P, Ozkan H E, Thistle H W. Evaporation rate and development of wetted area of water droplets with and without surfactant at different locations on waxy leaf surfaces. Biosystems Engineering, 2010, 106: 58-67.
[11]   Taylor P. The wetting of leaf surface. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2011, 16(4): 326-334.
[12]   Shih F F, Daigle K W, Champagne E T. Effect of rice wax on water vapour permeability and sorption properties of edible pullulan films. Food Chemistry, 2011, 127(1): 118-121.
[13]   Kolyva F, Stratakis E, Rhizopoulou S, Chimona C, Fotakis C. Leaf surface characteristics and wetting in Ceratonia siliqua L. Flora, 2012, 207(8): 551-556.
[14]   Zheng Q S, LÜ C J. Size effects of surface roughness to super hydrophobicity. Procedia IUTAM, 2014, 10: 462-475.
[15]   Sikorska D, Papierowska E, Szatylowicz J, Sikorski P, Suprun K, Hopkins R J. Variation in leaf surface hydrophobicity of wetland plants: the role of plant traits in water retention. Wetlands, 2017, 37(5): 997-1002.
[16]   Ebert T, Derksen R. A geometric model of mortality and crop protection for insects feeding on discrete toxicant deposits. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2004, 97(2): 155-162.
[17]   中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 表面活性剂——用拉起液膜法测定表面张力: GB/T 5549-2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, (2011-12-01)[2018-01-15].
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Surface active agents determination of surface tension by drawing up liquid films: GB/T 5549-2010[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, (2011-12-01)[2018- 01-15]. (in Chinese)
[18]   刘程, 张万福, 陈长明. 表面活性剂应用手册. 2版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1996: 28-43.
Liu C, Zhang W F, Chen C M. Manual for applying surfactant. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chemical Industrial Press, 1996: 28-43. (in Chinese)
[19]   顾中言, 许小龙, 韩丽娟. 几种植物临界表面张力值的估测. 现代农药, 2002(2): 18-20.
Gu Z Y, Xu X L, Han L J. Study on the method of measure of the critical surface tension of plants. Modern Agrochemicals, 2002(2): 18-20. (in Chinese)
[20]   屠豫钦, 李秉礼. 农药应用工艺学导论. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006: 33-36.
Tu Y Q, Li B L. Introduction to Application Technology of Pesticides. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006: 33-36. (in Chinese)
[21]   顾中言, 徐德进, 徐广春, 许小龙. 喷雾药液在植物叶片表面滞留量变化的计量装置: ZL 2011 1 0032409.8 [P]. (2011-10-05) [2018- 01-15].
Gu Z Y, Xu D J, Xu G C, Xu X L. Metering device for the change of spray liquid on the surface of plant leaves: ZL 2011 1 0032409.8[P]. (2011-10-05)[2018-01-15]. (in Chinese)
[22]   徐广春, 顾中言, 徐德进, 许小龙. 促进稻田农药利用效率的表面活性剂筛选. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7): 1370-1379.
Xu G C, Gu Z Y, Xu D J, Xu X L. Screening of surfactants for promoting the efficiency of pesticide used in paddy field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(7): 1370-1379. (in Chinese)
[23]   Pedibhotla V K, Hall F R, Holmsen J. Deposit characteristics and toxicity of fipronil formulations for tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) control on cotton. Crop Protection, 1999, 18(8): 493-499.
[24]   Qin W C, Qiu B J, Xue X Y, Chen C, Xu Z F, Zhou Q Q. Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers. Crop protection, 2016, 85: 79-88.
[25]   Martini X, Kincy N, Nansen C. Quantitative impact assessment of spray coverage and pest behavior on contact pesticide performance. Pest Management Science, 2012, 68(11): 1471-1477.
[26]   徐德进, 顾中言, 徐广春, 许小龙, 范鹏. 药液表面张力与喷雾方法对雾滴在水稻植株上沉积的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(2): 213-218.
Xu D J, Gu Z Y, Xu G C, Xu X L, Fan P. Effects of solution surface tension and spray methods on deposition of droplets on rice plants. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(2): 213-218. (in Chinese)
[27]   Wang S L, Song J L, He X K, Song L, Wang X N, Wang C L, Wang Z C, Ling Y. Performances evaluation of four typical unmanned aerial vehicles used for pesticide application in China. International journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2017, 10(4): 22-31.
[28]   Armstrong-Cho C, Wolf T, Chongo G, Gan Y, Hogg T, Lafond G, Johnson E, Banniza S. The effect of carrier volume on ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei) control in chickpea. Crop Protection, 2008, 27(6): 1020-1030.
[29]   徐德进, 顾中言, 徐广春, 许小龙. 喷雾方式对农药雾滴在水稻群体内沉积分布的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(1): 69-79.
Xu D J, Gu Z Y, Xu G C, Xu X L. Influence of spray method on the deposit and distribution of spray droplets in rice field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2014, 47(1): 69-79. (in Chinese)
[30]   JIN S Q, BLUEMLING B, MOL A P J. Information, trust and pesticide overuse: Interactions between retailers and cotton farmers in China. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 2015, 72/73: 23-32.
[1] GUAN RuoBing,LI HaiChao,MIAO XueXia. Commercialization Status and Existing Problems of RNA Biopesticides [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2949-2960.
[2] WEI Lei,MI XiaoTian,SUN LiQian,LI ZhaoMin,SHI Mei,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Current Status of Chemical Fertilizers, Pesticides, and Irrigation Water and Their Reducing Potentials in Wheat Production of Northern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2584-2597.
[3] YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,YU AiZhong,ZHAO Cai,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,FAN Hong,GUO Yao. Effects of Intercropped Wheat Straw Retention on Canopy Temperature and Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics of Intercropped Maize Mulched with Plastic During Grain Filling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4764-4776.
[4] YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,HU FaLong,FAN ZhiLong,FAN Hong,YU AiZhong,ZHAO Cai. Characteristics of Soil Water Utilization in Spring Wheat Field with Different Straw Retention Approaches in Dry Inland Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1247-1259.
[5] GU ChaoHeng,YAN YanYan,WEI XiYa,SHI QingHua,GONG Biao. Physiological Mechanism of S-adenosylmethionine on Alleviating Chlorothalonil Residue in Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(6): 1058-1065.
[6] HaiChao CAO,QingShun LIU,HaiXiu BAI,Jun HAN,ShiLing YANG,Ming XUE,Feng LIU. Development of 30% Clothianidin·Pyraclostrobin·Difenoconazole Flowable Concentrate for Seed-Coating and Its Application Effect in Peanut Field [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20): 3595-3604.
[7] XU Jin, ZHU JieHua, YANG YanLi, TANG Hao, Lü HePing, FAN MingShou, SHI Ying, DONG DaoFeng, WANG GuiJiang, WANG WanXing, XIONG XingYao, GAO YuLin. Status of Major Diseases and Insect Pests of Potato and Pesticide Usage in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(16): 2800-2808.
[8] DING XinYu, WANG ZiKui, YANG Xuan, DU ShanShan, SHEN YuYing. Response of Dry Land Soil Respiration to Conservation Tillage Practices During Drying-Wetting Cycles [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(24): 4759-4768.
[9] YE Meng-liang, NIE Ji-yun, XU Guo-feng, YAN Zhen, ZHENG Li-jing. Residue and Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment of Four Pesticides in Apple [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(7): 1289-1302.
[10] MA Shu-jie, LIU Lin, LU Xiao-peng, MA Zhi-qing, ZHANG Xing. Herbicidal Activities of Alkaloids from Cephalotaxus sinensis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(19): 3746-3753.
[11] ZHAO Heng-ke, LAN Yue, NAN Can, HU Yue, RAO Ping, TIAN Ya, YAN Wei, QIAN Kun, HE Lin. Preparation of 8% Fenpropathrin·Cyflumetofen Nano-Emulsion and Its Performance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(14): 2700-2710.
[12] XIONG Xin, GUO Shu-qi, LI Lin, MA Zhi-qing, ZHANG Xing. Effect of Sophora alopecuroides Alkaloids on Tomato Growth and Fruit Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(9): 1737-1746.
[13] MA Yan-dong, ZHAO Jing-bo, SHAO Tian-jie, XING Shan. Soil Moisture and Enrichment Regularity of Steppe Soil in Qinghai Lake Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(10): 1982-1995.
[14] QU Ming-Bo, LIU Tian, CHEN Lei, CHEN Qi, YANG Qing. Research Progresses in Insect Glycosyl Hydrolyase Family 20 β-N-acetylhexosamindase [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(7): 1303-1312.
[15] NIE Ji-yun, LI Zhi-xia, LIU Chuan-de, FANG Jin-bao, WANG Cheng, GUO Yong-ze, LEI Shao-rong, LI Hai-fei, XU Guo-feng, YAN Zhen. Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Apples [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(18): 3655-3667.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!