Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (20): 4040-4046.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.017

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Safety Evaluation of Cefquinome Sulfate Intramammary Infusion (Dry Cow)

WU Tong1, ZHANG Dao-kang2, LIU Mao-lin2, HUANG Hui-li2, ZHANG Ning3, XU Fei2, LIU Yi-ming2   

  1. 1College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095
    2Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
    3 College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094
  • Received:2016-03-15 Online:2016-10-16 Published:2016-10-16

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of cefquinome sulfate intramammary infusion(dry cow) on the body temperature, milk yield per day, somatic cell counts and mammary microbiota of the health dairy cows.【Method】Six primiparous and multiparous healthy dairy cow were selected, which have not been treated with any antibiotics by systemic or intramammary administration 30 days before. They were fed with food and water without any antibiotics and under normal conditions. Rectal temperature, milk yield per day and somatic cell counts per quarter were recorded on 1 and 0 day before administration, and pathogenic bacteria were isolated and identified. After a single intramammary administration of Cefquinome Sulfate Intramammary Infusion (Dry Cow) to each quarter, milk yield was recorded on 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 day after administration, rectal temperature per cow and somatic cell counts per quarter were recorded on 12 h, 3, 5, 7 and 10 day after administration, and pathogenic bacteria were isolated and identified on 10 day after administration. The data of rectal temperature, milk yield per day, somatic cell counts and pathogenic bacteria before and after administration were analyzed by SPSS software and the clinical symptom and adverse effects, such as red, swelling, heat and pain were observed continuously throughout the trial. 【Result】The average daily milk yield were 28.8, 27.7, 28.1, 28.7, 28.8, 29.2, and 29.6 kg on 1, 0 day before administration and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 day after administration, and it had no significant difference (P>0.05). The somatic cell counts per quarter at different time-points were all in the range of 300-500 thousand per milliliter. There were also no obvious difference in the average rectal temperature of 38.3, 38.4, 38.3, 38.3, 38.3, 38.2 and 38.3 at different time-points. The results for bacteria showed that totally 8 strains of E.coli, 5 strains of Streptococcus and 7 strains of Staphylococcus were isolated from the milk samples before administration, but only 1 strain of Streptococcus, 1 strain of Staphylococcus, and 1 strain of E.coli were isolated on 10 day after administration, and no new species of bacteria were found.【Conclusion】It was concluded that cefquinome sulfate intramammary infusion(Dry Cow) is safe for dairy cow, since it has no adverse effect on rectal temperature, milk yield and somatic cell counts.

Key words: cefquinome sulfate intramammary infusion, dry cow, safety, somatic cell counts

[1]    刘裕田. 奶牛乳房炎的发病原因及防治. 当代畜牧,2015(23): 46-48.
LIU Y T.  The etiology and prevention and control of dairy cow mastitis. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2015(23): 46-48.(in Chinese)
[2]    郑丹. 奶牛乳房炎的发病原因及综合防治措施. 农技服务, 2015, 32(1):137-138.
ZHENG D. The etiology of dairy cow mastitis and comprehensive prevention and control measures. Agricultural Technology Service, 2015, 32(1):137-138. (in Chinese)
[3]    倪春霞, 蒲万霞, 胡永浩, 邓海平, 王玲, 孟小琴. 奶牛乳房炎病原菌的分离鉴定及耐药性分析. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(2):20-24.
NI C X, PU W X, HU Y H, DENG H P, WANG L, MENG X Q. Isolation , identification and drug sensitive test of pathogenic bactcria causing dairy cattle mastitis. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2010, 19(2):20-24.(in Chinese)
[4]    谷春雷. 奶牛乳房炎的发病原因及防治措施. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2015, 36(1):102-103.
Gu C L. The etiology and prevention and control of dairy cow mastitis. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2015, 36(1):102-103. (in Chinese)
[5]    HERINGSTAD B, KLEMETSDAL G, RUANE J. Clinical mastitis in Norwegian cattle: Frequency, variance components and genetic correlation with protein yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 1999, 82(6):1325-1330.
[6]    FENLON D R, LOGUE D N, GUNN J, WILSON J. A study of mastitis bacteria and herd management practices to identify their relationship to high somatic cell counts in bulk tank milk.The British Veterinary Journal, 1995,151(1):17-25.
[7]    王玲, 李宏胜, 王正兵, 严作庭, 苗小楼, 陈炅然, 祁光红, 肖俊武, 张继良. 规模化奶牛养殖区奶牛乳房炎的调查及病因分析. 中国乳业, 2010(10):50-53.
WANG L, LI H S, WANG Z B, YAN Z T, MIAO X L, CHEN J R, QI G H, XIAO J W, ZHANG J L. An investigation and analysis of reason of dairy cow mastitis.China Dairy, 2010(10):50-53.(in Chinese)
[8]    DINGWELL R T, LESLIE K E, SCHUKKEN Y H, SARGEANT J M, TIMMS L L, DUFFIELD T F, KEEFE G P, KELTON D F, LISSEMORE K D, CONKLIN J. Association of cow and quarter-level factors at drying-off with new intramammary infections during the dry period. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2004(63): 75-89.
[9]    EBERHART R J. Management of dry cows to reduce mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 1986, 69: 1721-1732.
[10]   史同瑞, 王爽, 吴博. 干乳期奶牛乳房炎防治与保健. 中国动物保健, 2012, 14(1):38-40.
SHI T R, WANG S, WU B. The prevention of Dry milk cow Mastitis. China Animal Health, 2012, 14(1):38-40. (in Chinese)
[11]   刘美瑞, 赵地顺, 刘宝树, 刘林英, 汪学良, 李俊盼, 葛京京. 头孢喹肟研究进展. 中国畜牧兽医, 2013, 40(4):216-220.
LIU M R, ZHAO D S, LIU B S, LIU L Y, WANG X L, LI J P, GE J J. Advance of study on Cefquinome. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2013, 40(4):216-220. (in Chinese)
[12]   王付民,陈杖榴. 头孢喹诺的研究进展. 动物医学进展, 2004, 25(4):50-53.
WANG F M, CHEN Z L. Advance of study on Cefquinome. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2004, 25(4):50-53. (in Chinese)
[13]   俞吉杰, 余祖功, 赵杰, 刘利峰, 段复康, 江善祥. HPLC法测定硫酸头孢喹肟冻干粉针中硫酸头孢喹肟含量. 畜牧与兽医, 2008, 40(9):31-34.
YU J J, YU Z G, ZHAO J, LIU L F, DUAN F K, JIANG S X. Determination of cefquinomesulphate in cefquinomesulphate lyophilized powder by HPLC. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2008, 40(9): 31-34. (in Chinese)
[14]   SHPIGEL N Y, LEVIN D, WINKLER M, SARAN A, ZIV G, BOTTNER A. Efficacy of cefquinome for treatment of cows with mastitis experimentally induced using Escherichia coli. Journal of Dairy Science, 1997, 80(2):318-323.
[15]   MURPHY S P,ERWINM E,JONES R N. Cefquinome (HR 11lV) in vitro evaluation of a broad-spectrum cephalosporin indicated for infections in animals. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1994, 20(1):49-55.
[16]   郭亚楠, 周德刚, 李建成, 江海洋. 硫酸头孢喹肟注射液在猪体内的药代动力学及生物等效性研究. 中国兽药杂质, 2013, 47(7): 33-37.
GUO Y N, ZHOU D G, LI J C, JIANG H Y. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of cefquinome sulfate injection in pigs. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Drug, 2013, 47(7):33-37. (in Chinese)
[17]   AL-TAHER A Y. Pharmacokinetics of cefquinome in camels. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2010, 9(4):848-852.
[18]   张成.硫酸头孢喹肟注射液肌肉刺激性试验. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2011, 32(11):53-54.
ZHANG C. Cefquinome Sulfateinjection muscle stimulation experiment. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2011, 32(11): 53-54. (in Chinese)
[19]   荣俊, 张军忍, 余祖功, 江善祥.国产硫酸头孢喹肟对小鼠的急性和蓄积毒性研究. 动物医学进展, 2008, 29(2):48-51.
RONG J, ZHANG J R, YU Z G, JIANG S X. Study on acute toxicity and cumulative toxicity of domestic cefquinome sulfate in mice. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 2008, 29(2):48-51. (in Chinese)
[20]   SHPIGEL N Y,LEVIN D,WINKLER M. Efficacy of cefquinome for treatment of cows with mastitis experimentally induced using Escherichia coli. Journal of Dairy Science, 1997, 80(2):318-323.
[21]   EHINGER A M, SCHMIDT H, KIETZMANN M. Tissue distribution of cefquinome after intramammary and “systemic”administration in the isolated perfused bovine udder. The Veterinary Journal, 2006, 172(1): 147-153.
[22]   Knappstein K, Suhren G, Walte H G. Influence of milking frequency on withdrawal period after application of lactam antibiotic-based drugs. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2003, 483(1):241-249.
[23]   冯言言, 王海挺, 郑莉, 张智德, 孔梅, 吴连勇, 李培峰. 硫酸头孢喹肟乳房注入剂治疗奶牛乳房炎的临床疗效观察. 中国奶牛, 2014(5):28-30.
FENG Y Y, WANG H T, ZHENG L, ZHANG Z D, KONG M, WU L Y, LI P F.The study of clinical curative effect on cefquinome sulfate intramammary infusion in dairy cows. China Dairy Cattle, 2014(5): 28-30. (in Chinese)
[24]   GURIN-FAUBLEE V, CARRET G HOUFFSCHMIT. In vitro activity of 10 antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated form cows with clinical mastitis. The Verterinary Record, 2003, 152:466-471.
[25]   PENGOV A. The role of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. and associated somatic cell counts in the ovine mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84(3):572-574.
[26]   U.S. Food and Drug Administration CVM GFI #49. Target Animal Safety and Drug Effectiveness Studies for Anti-Microbial Bovine Mastitis Products (Lactating and Non-Lactating Cow Products) [S]Revised April 4, 1996 (Revises the February 1, 1993 Guideline)
[1] ZENG XiaoShan,TANG GuoHua,XIE HongJun,ZHU MingDong,AO HeJun,CHEN Bo,LI FangTing,HAO Ming,XIAO Yan,FU HuiRong,ZHANG Jian,YU YingHong. Selection of PMS Rice Varieties and Application in Flooding Irrigation for Cadmium Reduction [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(17): 3561-3572.
[2] HUI YuanYuan,PENG HaiShuai,WANG BiNi,ZHANG FuXin,LIU YuFang,JIA Rong,REN Rong. Research Progress of Food-Borne Pathogen Detection Based on Electrochemical and Optical Aptasensors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2419-2433.
[3] WANG XiaoBin, YAN Xiang, LI XiuYing. Environmental Safety Risk for Application of Anaerobic Fermentation Biogas Slurry from Livestock Manure in Agricultural Land in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 110-139.
[4] HuiLin YU,Fang JIA,ZongHua QUAN,HaiLan CUI,XiangJu LI. Effects of Glyphosate on Weed Control, Soybean Safety and Weed Occurrence in Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Soybean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1166-1177.
[5] WANG Yi,LI Miao,LI YongFeng,SUN Yuan,QIU HuaJi. Identification and Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Wild Boar Feces [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(14): 2964-2973.
[6] Jing LIU,Chao LI,JinXiong LIU,Rui HE,YanRong SUN. The Role of High-Level Biosafety Laboratories in Biosafety and Consideration About Their Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 74-80.
[7] ZHAO Man, TANG JinRong, NIU LinLin, CHEN Lin, LIANG GeMei. Ecological Safety Evaluation of Different Bt Proteins on the Predator Chrysopa pallens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(9): 1541-1552.
[8] WANG XiaoBin,YAN Xiang,LI XiuYing,JI HongJie. Environmental Risks for Application of Phosphogysum in Agricultural Soils in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 293-311.
[9] HUA WeiYi,LIU YiMing,XU Fei,LU YongQiang,KONG Mei,WANG HaiTing,HUANG HuiLi,WANG HongLei,WU LianYong,LI XiuBo. The Safety Evaluation of Cefalonium Intramammary Infusion (Dry Cow) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 359-366.
[10] YAN ChaoQun,LI ShuaiPeng,ZHANG Shen,XIE Shun,WEI KaiYun,HUANG XianHui. Residue Depletion Study and Withdrawal Period for Cefalonium Intramammary Infusion (Dry cow) in Bovine Milk [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 367-375.
[11] WANG XiaoBin, YAN Xiang, LI XiuYing, CAI DianXiong, LEI Mei. Environment Risk for Application of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum in Soils in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 926-939.
[12] JIA ShiRong. Risk Assessment and Regulation of Genetically Engineered Crops: History and Reformation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(4): 601-612.
[13] LONG DingPei, HAO ZhanZhang, XIANG ZhongHuai, ZHAO AiChun. Current Status of Transgenic Technologies for Safety Consideration in Silkworm (Bombyx mori) and Future Perspectives [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(2): 363-373.
[14] SHEN Ping, ZHANG QiuYan, YANG LiTao, ZHANG Li, LI WenLong, LIANG JinGang, LI XiaYing, WANG HaoQian, SHEN XiaoLing, SONG GuiWen. The Safety Management of Genome Editing Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(8): 1361-1369.
[15] LIU Mao-lin, LIU Yi-ming, XU Fei, ZHANG Dao-kang, HUANG Hui-li, LI Han, LI Xiu-bo. The Detection Methods of the Related Substances in Cefquinome Sulfate Intramammary Infusion [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(15): 3054-3062.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!