Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (S): 94-103.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.S.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Ensiling and Natural Drying on Composition and Abundance of Bacterium of Corn Stalk Analyzed by MiSeq Sequencing Technology

TAO Lian, DIAO Qi-yu   

  1. Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2015-09-21 Online:2015-10-20 Published:2015-10-20

Abstract: 【Objective】The microbes carried by corn stalk maybe had the potential impact on the nutrients absorption and utilization of nutrients and animal health, due to the large amount of feeding. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of ensiling and natural drying of corn stalk silage on its bacterium composition and abundance, and try to provide a theoretical basis for the utilization of corn stalk from the microbiological point of view. 【Method】 The effect of ensiling and natural drying on composition and abundance of bacterium of corn stalk was analyzed using MiSeq sequencing technology. 【Result】The results showed that, the overall number of OTUs detected by the analysis reached 10887 based on ≥ 97% nucleotide sequence identity between reads, and the rarefaction curve of each sample was flattening. These implied that the sequencing depth was sufficient to reflect the vast majority of bacterium in the samples. There were differences and similarities on the composition and abundance of bacterium during stuff, dried and silage samples of corn stalk. Flora constitute of dry corn stalks was the most complex, followed by corn stalk stuff and the silage. The numbers of Proteobacteria plylum, Gammaproteobacteria class, Enterobacteriales order, Enterobacteriaceae family in dry corn stalk were 96.53%, 90.67%, 81.42% and 81.42%, which were significantly increased compared with stuff of corn stalk (P<0.05); while the numbers of Proteobacteria plylum, Gammaproteobacteria class, Enterobacteriales order, Enterobacteriaceae family in corn stalk silage were 55.93%, 37.51%, 25.03% and 25.03%, which were significantly decreased compared with stuff and dry corn stalk (P<0.05). 4) The numbers of Firmicutes phylum, Bacilli class, Lactobacillales order, Lactobacillaceae family, and Pediococcus genus in corn stalk silage were 39.10%, 38.91%, 38.81%, 32.08% and 28.14%, which were significantly increased compared with stuff and dry corn stalk (P<0.05); while the numbers of Firmicutes phylum, Bacilli class, Lactobacillales order, Lactobacillaceae family, and Pediococcus genus in corn stalk silage were only 2.47%, 2.45%, 2.39%, 1.55% and 1.32%. 【Conclusion】 There was significant difference on bacterium composition and abundance between dried and silage samples of corn stalk; the using method of ensiling was better than natural dried corn stalk. MiSeq sequencing technology could provide the information of composition and abundance of flora.

Key words: MiSeq, corn stalk, ensiling, natural drying, bacterium

[1]    张永根. 饲料组合效应及其对纤维物质消化率的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2001(11): 33-35.
Zhang Y G. Feed composition effect and its impact on fiber digestibility. Heilongjiang Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2001(11): 33-35. (in Chinese)
[2]    杨文琦, 龙宣杞, 崔卫东. 玉米青贮中细菌多样性分析. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(8): 1424-1433.
Yang W Q, Long X Q, Cui W D. Bacteria diversity analysis in corn silage. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(8): 1424-1433. (in Chinese)
[3]    王彦波, 许梓荣. 饲料营养水平对家畜肠道微生物和疾病的影响. 兽药与饲料添加剂, 2003, 8(4): 31-34.
Wang Y B, Xu Z R. Nutritional levels of gut microbes and diseases of livestock. Veterinary Pharmaceuticals & Feed Additives, 2003, 8(4): 31-34. (in Chinese)
[4]    张慧杰. 饲草青贮微生物菌群动态变化与乳酸菌的鉴定筛选[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
Zhang H J. Identification and screening of forage silage microflora dynamic changes of lactic acid bacteria[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011. (in Chinese)
[5]    Dunière L, Sindou J, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Chevallier I, Thévenot-Sergentet D.Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2013, 182(1/4): 1-15.
[6]    Santos A O, Avila C L S, Schwan R F. Selection of tropical lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the quality of maize silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(12): 7777-7789.
[7]    程银华, 雷雪芹, 徐廷生, 王帅, 王玉峰, 田英申. 揉丝微贮与传统青贮秸秆的微生物组成与营养成分分析. 家畜生态学报, 2013, 34(4): 41-44.
Cheng Y H, Lei X Q, Xu T S, Wang S, Wang Y F, Tian Y S. Microbe composition and nutrient content analysis for straws of micro-storage and traditional silage. Acta Ecologae Animalis Domastici, 2013, 34(4): 41-44. (in Chinese)
[8]    李旭娇, 玉柱. 苜蓿青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌菌株的筛选. 中国奶牛, 2014(11): 37-40.
Li X J, Yu Z. Filtering of excellent lactic acid bacteria strains from alfalfa silage. China Dairy Cattle, 2014(11): 37-40. (in Chinese)
[9]    Degnan P H, Ochman H. Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity. ISME Journal, 2012, 6(1): 183-194.
[10]   Bokulich N A, Subramanian S, Faith J J, Gevers D, Gordon J I, Knight R, Mills D ACaporaso J G. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nature Methods, 2012, 10(1): 11-57.
[11]   Capoaso J G, Lauber C L, Walters W A, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME Journal, 2012, 6(8): 1621-1624.
[12] Youssef N, Sheik C S, Krumholz L R, Najar F Z, Roe B A. Comparison of species richness estimates obtained using nearly complete fragments and simulated Pyrosequencing-Generated fragments in 16S rRNA Gene-Based environmental surveys. Applied and Encironmental Nvironmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(16): 5227-5236.
[13]   Matthias H, Alexander S, Rob E, Tae-Wan K, Harshal C. Metagenomic discovery of Biomass-Degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science, 2011, 331(6016): 463-467.
[14]   Luo C W, Tsementzi D, Kyprides N, Read T, Konstantinidis K T. Direct comparisons of illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample. Plos One, 2012, 7(2): e300872.
[15]   Degnan P H, Ochman H. Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity. ISME Journal, 2012, 6(1): 183-194.
[16]   闫绍鹏, 杨瑞华, 冷淑娇, 王秋玉, 周容涛. 高通量测序技术及其在农业科学研究中的应用. 中国农学通报, 2012(30): 171-176.
Yan S P, Yang R H, Leng S J, Wang Q Y, Zhou R T. High-fluxed DNA sequencing technology and its application in agricultural science research. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012(30): 171-176. (in Chinese)
[17]   Jensen G S, Patterson K M, Yoon I. 酵母培养物具有抗大肠杆菌和抗真菌而不影响健康微生物区系的特性. 饲料工业, 2008(24): 30-32.
Jensen G S, Patterson K M, Yoon I. Characters of anti-Colibacillus and anti-fungal of yeast culture. Feed Industry 2008(24): 30-32. (in Chinese),
[18]   赵珺, 黄玉珍. 枯草芽孢杆菌与酵母培养物对奶牛产奶性能的影响研究. 长春大学学报, 2007, 17(4): 52-56.
Zhao J, Huang Y Z. Effects of bacillus subtilis and yeast culture for feed intake and milk production. Journal of Changchun University, 2007, 17(4): 52-56. (in Chinese)
[19]   Cai Y P, Saman P, Benno Y. Classification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of common carp and freshwater prawns. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 1999, 45(4): 177-184.
[20]   Xue F, Zhou Z, Ren L P, Meng Q X. Influence of rumen-protected lysine supplementation on growth performance and plasma amino acid concentrations in growing cattle offered the maize stalk silage/maize grain-based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 169(1/2): 61-67.
[21]   Wang R, Sun Y, Zhang S, Lu X. Two-step pretreatment of corn stalk silage for increasing sugars production and decreasing the amount of catalyst. Bioresource Techenology, 2012, 120: 290-294.
[22]   Yang H J, Xie C Y. Assessment of fibrolytic activities of 18 commercial enzyme products and their abilities to degrade the cell wall fraction of corn stalks in vitro enzymatic and ruminal batch cultures. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2010, 159(3/4): 110-121.
[23]   穆秀明, 田树飞, 陈哲凯, 李艳清. 青贮玉米秸秆的饲用价值分析. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2011(6): 89-90.
Mu X M, Tian S F, Chen Z K, Li Y Q. Analysis of feeding value of silage corn stalks. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2011(6): 89-90. (in Chinese)
[24]   雷剑, 王敏奇, 李卫芬. 家畜内源性CatheIiCidin抗菌肽的表达调控及其生物学作用. 中国饲料, 2007(24): 25-29.
Lei J, Wang M Q, Li W F. Regulation and biological role within the livestock-derived antimicrobial peptide expression CatheIiCidin. China Feed, 2007(24): 25-29. (in Chinese)
[25]   李泽青, 闫峻, 张永芳, 张菊. 青贮发酵过程中主要微生物的活动规律及控制. 广东畜牧兽医科技, 2011(6): 12-15.
Li Z Q, Yan J, Zhang Y F, Zhang J. Activities of silage fermentation process and control of major microorganisms. Guangdong Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science, 2011(6): 12-15. (in Chinese)
[26]   张想峰, 艾尼瓦尔·艾山, 买热木尼沙·吾甫尔, 闫京阳, 于苏甫·热西提. 新疆小芦苇青贮中乳酸杆菌的分离鉴定. 新疆农业科学, 2009, 46(6): 1327-1331.
Zhang X F, Ainiwaer A, Mairemunisha W, Yan J Y, Yusufu R. Isolation and identification of lactobacillus from Xinjiang small reed silage. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 46(6): 1327-1331. (in Chinese)
[27]   杨杨, 石超, 郭旭生. 高寒草甸魏斯氏乳酸茵的分离鉴定及理化特性研究. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 266-275.
Yang Y, Shi C, Guo X S. Characterization and identification of Weissella species isolated from Kobresia littledalei growing in alpine meadows. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 266-275. (in Chinese)
[1] JIANG QiQi,XU JianJian,SU Yue,ZHANG Qi,CAO Peng,SONG ChenHu,LI ZhongAn,SONG Zhen. Construction and Application of Infectious Clone of Citrus Yellow Mosaic Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4840-4850.
[2] ZHAO WeiSong,GUO QingGang,SU ZhenHe,WANG PeiPei,DONG LiHong,HU Qing,LU XiuYun,ZHANG XiaoYun,LI SheZeng,MA Ping. Characterization of Fungal Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Healthy and Diseased-Verticillium Wilt Potato Plants and Carbon Source Utilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2): 296-309.
[3] HUANG ZiYue,LIU WenJun,QIN RenLiu,PANG ShiChan,XIAO Jian,YANG ShangDong. Endophytic Bacterial Community Composition and PICRUSt Gene Functions in Different Pumpkin Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 4018-4032.
[4] ZHAO WeiSong,GUO QingGang,LI SheZeng,WANG PeiPei,LU XiuYun,SU ZhenHe,ZHANG XiaoYun,MA Ping. Effect of Wilt-Resistant and Wilt-Susceptible Cotton on Soil Bacterial Community Structure at Flowering and Boll Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5): 942-954.
[5] GONG Qiang,WANG Ke,YE XingGuo,DU LiPu,XU YanHao. Generation of Marker-Free Transgenic Barley Plants by Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18): 3638-3649.
[6] WeiSong ZHAO,QingGang GUO,SheZeng LI,YaJiao WANG,XiuYun LU,PeiPei WANG,ZhenHe SU,XiaoYun ZHANG,Ping MA. Control Efficacy of Broccoli Residues on Cotton Verticillium Wilt and Its Effect on Soil Bacterial Community at Different Growth Stages [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4505-4517.
[7] ZHANG XiaoLi,ZHANG HongYuan,LU Chuang,PANG HuanCheng,JIN CunWang,GAO Xi,CHENG AiPing,LI YuYi. Effects of the Different Autumn Irrigation Years on Soil Bacterial Community in Hetao Irrigation District [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(19): 3380-3392.
[8] NIU Lu, ZHAO QianQian, YANG Jing, XING GuoJie, ZHANG Wei, HE HongLi, YANG XiangDong. Over-Expression of Yeast PAC1 Confers Enhanced Resistance to Soybean mosaic virus in Transgenic Soybean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(2): 217-225.
[9] WANG QingFeng, JIANG Xin, MA MingChao, GUAN DaWei, ZHAO BaiSuo, WEI Dan, CAO FengMing, LI Li, LI Jun. Influence of Long-Term Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Community in Mollisols of Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(17): 3315-3324.
[10] ZHOU JingLong, FENG ZiLi, FENG HongJie, LI YunQing, YUAN Yuan, LI ZhiFang, WEI Feng, SHI YongQiang, ZHAO LiHong, SUN ZhengXiang, ZHU HeQin, ZHOU Yi. Biocontrol Effect and Mechanism of Cotton Endophytic Bacterium Bacillus cereus YUPP-10 Against Verticillium Wilt in Gossypium hirsutum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(14): 2717-2727.
[11] Qingge-er, GAO Ju-lin, YU Xiao-fang, HU Shu-ping, WANG Zhi-gang, WANG Zhen, Naoganchaolu BORJIGIN . Function and Composition Stability of a Composite Microbial System GF-20 with Efficient Corn Stalk Decomposition Under Low Temperature [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(3): 443-454.
[12] LI Chun-jiang, XU Zhao-hong, SHI Qing-ping, QIN Tian-tian, DONG Zhao-xia, ZHANG Jian-guo. The Yield, Nutritional Value and Silage Quality of Three Wheat Varieties Planted on the Winter Fallow Field [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(2): 399-406.
[13] ZHANG Su-yu, WANG He-zhou, YANG Ming-da, WANG Jing-li, HE De-xian. Influence of Returning Corn Stalks to Field Under Different Soil Moisture Contents on Root Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(13): 2484-2496.
[14] LIU Yan-rong, CEN Hui-fang, YAN Jian-ping, ZHANG Wan-jun. Optimizing of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Switchgrass Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(1): 80-89.
[15] HOU Wen-sheng, LIN Kang-xue, CHEN Pu, JIA Zhi-wei, ZHOU Yang, YU Yang, LIU Yan-hua. Establishment and Prospect of Efficient Transformation Systems for Soybean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(21): 4198-4210.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!