Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2013, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (22): 4800-4807.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.22.018

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Immune Stress on the Bacterial Community in the Broiler Chickens Gastrointestinal Tract Analyzed by Real-Time PCR

 FENG  Yan-12, YANG  Xiao-Jun-2, LI  Wu-Lin-2, YANG  Ning-1, YAO  Jun-Hu-2   

  1. 1.College of Life Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi
    2.College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
  • Received:2013-03-11 Online:2013-11-15 Published:2013-07-23

Abstract: 【Objective】The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of immune stress on intestinal microflora and common bacteria changes of broiler chickens. 【Method】 One hundred and eighty 1-day old AA broilers were allocated into 4 groups. Each treatment had 5 replicate cages of 9 broilers per replicate pen. Different immune stress models, including the control group (no vaccines, NV), conventional vaccines group (CV), immune hyperthyroidism group (LPS) and immune suppression group (CYP) were set in this study. On d 21, 28, 35 and 42, each treatment group from each of 6 chickens, after slaughter, jejunum, ileum and duodenum and cecum intestinal contents were collected under sterile operation. 【Result】Gastrointestinal tract Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Enterococcus in broilers under immunological stress were analyzed by RT-PCR. The dynamic distribution and changes of the four bacterial species in the broiler's digestive tract were also analyzed systematically. Among the 4 genera of bacteria, changes mainly concentrated in the ileum and cecum, and the Enterobacteriaceae content was 5.03-7.88 copies/mg, Lactobacillus content was 5.48-10.34 copies/mg, Bifidobacterium content was 4.11-7.98 copies/mg, Enterococcus content was 5.61-8.79 copies/mg. The results showed that immune stress makes the four bacterial species in broiler's digestive tract change conspicuously in their genic copy when compared with CV. In which, the changes of the four bacterial species mainly represent in ileum and cecum, while the changes of days by duodenum species is not clear. 【Conclusion】 Immune stress results in the changes of the intestinal flora composition, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are relatively high in NV case and LPS and CYP did not affect intestinal flora changes of chicken in late stage.

Key words: RT-PCR , intestinal microflora , immue stress , broilers

[1]Alverdy J C, Chang E B. The re-emerging role of the intestinal microflora in critical illness and inflammation: why the gut hypothesis of sepsis syndrome will not go away. Journal of Leukocyte Biology, 2008,83: 461-466.

[2]冯焱, 杨小军, 胡雄兵, 刘烨, 尹瑞卿, 覃定奎, 姚军虎. 免疫应激对肉鸡肠道微生物区系的影响. 农业生物技术学报, 2012, 20(7):807-814.

Feng Y, Yang X J, Hu X B, Liu Y, Ying R Q, Qin D K, Yao J H. Effects of different immune status on the variation of intestinal microflora community in broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology,  2012, 20(7):807-814. (in Chinese)

[3]姚琨. 肉仔鸡后肠道主要正常菌群组成及其演替规律的研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学, 2006.

Yao K, Research on regular of microbial composition and its succession in broiler chickens[D]. Beijing: China Agriculture University, 2006. (in Chinese)

[4]Steinhof F U. Who controls the crowd? New findings and old questions about the intestinal microflora. Immunology Letters, 2005, 99(1): 12 -16.

[5]Chierici R, Fanaro S, Saccomandia D, Vigi V. Advances in the modulation of the microbial ecology of the gut in early infancy. Acta Paediatrt,  2003,91(Suppl.):56-63.

[6]Li X Q, Li Q, Xu C L. Effect of supplementation of fructooligosaccharide and/or bacillus subtilis to diets on performance and on intestinal microflora in broilers. Archives of Animal Breeding, 2008, 51:64-70.

[7]Wallace T D, Bradley S, Buckley N D, Green-Johnson J M, Interactions of lactic acid bacteria with human intestinal epithelial cells: effects on cytokine production. Journal of Food Protection, 2003, 66:466-472.

[8]Yang Y, Iji P A, Kocher A, Thomson E, Mikkelsen L L, Choct M. Effects of mannanoligosaccharide in broiler chicken diets on growth performance, energy utilization, nutrient digestibility, and intestinal microflora. British of Poultry Science, 2008, 49:186-194.

[9]Johnson R W. Inhibition of growth by pro-inflammatory cytokines: an integrated view. Animal Science, 1997, 75(5): 1244-1255.

[10]Kopecny J, Mrazek J, Fliegerova K, Fruhauf P, Tuckova L. The intestinal microflora of childhood patients with indicated celiac disease. Folia Microbiologica, 2008, 53(3): 214-216.

[11]Smehilova M, Vlkova E, Nevoral J, Flajsmanova K, Killer J, Rada V. Comparison of intestinal microflora in healthy infants and infants with allergic colitis. Folia Microbiologica, 2008, 53: 255-258.

[12]Lee S, Lillehoj H S, Parka D W, Honga Y H, Lin J J. Effects of Pediococcus- and Saccharomyces-based probiotic (MitoMaxs) on coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2007, 30: 261-268.

[13]Cunningham-Rundles S, McNeeley D F, Moon A. Mechanisms of nutrient modulation of the immune response. Journal Allergy Clinal Immunity, 2005, 15: 1119-1128.

[14]Kogut M H, Klasing K. An immunologist’s perspective on nutrition, immunity, and infectious diseases: Introduction and overview. Journal Applied Poultry Research, 2009, 18:103-110.

[15]Dahllof I. Molecular community analysis of microbial diversity. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2002, 13(3): 213-217.

[16]Takaishi H, Matsuki T, Nakazawa A, Takada T, Kado S, Asahara T, Kamada N, Sakuraba A, Yajima T, Higuchi H, Inoue N, Ogata H, Iwao Y, Nomoto K, Tanaka R, Hibi T. Imbalance in intestinal microflora constitution could be involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2008, 298:463-472.

[17]Teo A Y, Tan H M, Evaluation of the performance and intestinal gut microflora of  roilers fed on corn-soy diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 (CloSTAT). Journal Applied Poultry Research, 2007, 16: 296-303.

[18]倪学勤, Joshua Gong, Hai Yu, Shayan Sharif, 曾东. PCR-DGGE 技术分析蛋鸡 MHC 基因对肠道细菌种群结构的影响, 中国农业科学,  2009, 42(7):2564-2571.

Ni X Q, Gong J H, Yu H, Shaif S Y, Zeng D, Influence of MHC genotype on the bacterial community in the layer gastrointestinal tract analyzed by PCR-DGGE. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(7):2564-2571. (in Chinese)

[19]潘康成, 陈正礼, 崔恒敏, 冯兴, 盛琴, 赵爽. 利用 ERIC-PCR和 PCR-DGGE技术分析喂服枯草芽孢杆菌肉鸡肠道菌群的多样性. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22(4): 985 -991.

Pan K C, Chen Z L, Cui H M, Feng X, Sheng Q, Zhao S. Analysis of intestinal microflora diversity in broiler treated with Bacillus subtilis by ERIC-PCR and PCR-DGGE. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 22(4): 985-991. (in Chinese)

[20]Kim G B, Seo Y M, Kim C H, Paik I K. Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora, and immune response of broilers. Poultry Science, 2011, 90: 75-82.

[21]Jessica A C, Craig M C P. Intestinal crosstalk: a new paradigm for understanding the gut as the “motor” of critical illness. Shock, 2007,  28(4):384- 393.

[22]Maloy K J, Poweie F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature, 2011, 474: 298-306.

[23]Lan Y, Verstegen M W A, Tamminga S, Williams B A. The role of the commensal gut microbial community in broiler chickens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 2005, 3(61):95-104.

[24]Yang X J, Li W L, Feng Y, Yao J H. Effects of immune stress on growth performance, immunity, and cecal microflora in chickens. Poultry Science, 2011, 49, 2740-2746.

[25]何明清, 程安春. 动物微生态学.成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 2004.

He M Q, Cheng A C. Animal Micro-ecology. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 2004. (in Chinese)

[26]Sudo N. Stress and gut microbiota: Does postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal system for stress response? International Congress Series, 2006, 1287:350-354.
[1] WANG YiDan,YANG FaLong,CHEN DiShi,XIANG Hua,REN YuPeng. One-Step Multiple TaqMan Real-time RT-PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Swine Diarrhea Viruses [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 179-192.
[2] WANG SiTong,CHEN Yan,LUO YuJia,YANG YuanYuan,JIANG ZhiYang,JIANG XinYi,ZHONG Fan,CHEN Hao,XU HongXing,WU Yan,DUAN HongXia,TANG Bin. Effect of Three Novel Compounds on Trehalose and Chitin Metabolism and Development of Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1568-1578.
[3] XIE LiXue,ZHANG XiaoYan,ZHANG LiJie,ZHENG Shan,LI Tao. Complete Genome Sequence Characteristics and TC-RT-PCR Detection of East Asian Passiflora Virus Infecting Passiflora edulis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4408-4418.
[4] WANG XueJie,XING Shuang,ZHAO ShaoMeng,ZHOU Ying,LI XiuMei,LIU QingXiu,MA DanDan,ZHANG MinHong,FENG JingHai. Effects of Heat Stress on Ileal Microbiota of Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3450-3460.
[5] YuYan YANG,YaoWen LI,Shuang XING,MinHong ZHANG,JingHai FENG. The Temperature-Humidity Index Estimated by the Changes of Surface Temperature of Broilers at Different Ages [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1270-1279.
[6] KANG JunMei,ZHANG QiaoYan,JIANG Xu,WANG Zhen,ZHANG TieJun,LONG RuiCai,CUI HuiTing,YANG QingChuan. Cloning MsSQE1 from Alfalfa and Functional Analysis in Saponin Synthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(2): 247-260.
[7] XU JianJian,WANG YanJiao,DUAN Yu,MA ZhiMin,BIN Yu,ZHOU ChangYong,SONG Zhen. Construction of Genome-Length cDNA of Citrus Vein Enation Virus and Identification of Its Infectivity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18): 3707-3715.
[8] ZHANG DaoWei,KANG Kui,YU YaYa,KUANG FuPing,PAN BiYing,CHEN Jing,TANG Bin. Characteristics and Immune Response of Prophenoloxidase Genes in Sogatella furcifera [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(15): 3108-3119.
[9] LIU YiRan,ZHANG Hong,JIN JiSu,ZHOU ZhongShi,GUO JianYing. Identification and Expression Analysis of the Halloween Gene Family in Agasicles hygrophila [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(10): 2009-2019.
[10] Shuang XING,JingHai FENG. Effects of Lactobacillus Supplements on Growth Performance of Broilers: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 183-190.
[11] DING YanJuan,LIU YongKang,LUO YuJia,DENG YingMei,XU HongXing,TANG Bin,XU CaiDi. Potential Functions of Nilaparvata lugens GSK-3 in Regulating Glycogen and Trehalose Metabolism [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1237-1246.
[12] TANG Bin,SHEN QiDa,ZENG BoPing,XIAO ZhongJiu,QIU LingYu,PAN BiYing,LI Kun,ZHANG DaoWei. Characteristics, Developmental Expression and RNAi Effect Analysis of a Novel Trehalose-6-Phosphate Synthase Gene in Nilaparvata lugens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 466-477.
[13] YANG YuYan,WANG XueJie,ZHANG MinHong,FENG JingHai. The Upper Limit Temperature of Thermoneutral Zone Estimated by the Changes of Temperature and Respiration Rate of the Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 550-557.
[14] JunBo PENG,XingHong LI,Wei ZHANG,Ying ZHOU,JinBao HUANG,JiYe YAN. Pathogenicity and Gene Expression Pattern of the Exocrine Protein LtGH61A of Grape Canker Fungus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4518-4526.
[15] WAN DongLi,HOU XiangYang,DING Yong,REN WeiBo,WANG Kai,LI XiLiang,WAN YongQing. Response and the Expression of Pi-Responsive Genes in Leymus chinensis Under Inorganic Phosphate Treatment [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4215-4227.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!