氮添加对不同种植模式下人工草地产量稳定性的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.15.006

中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (15): 3007-3019.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.15.006

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇下一篇

氮添加对不同种植模式下人工草地产量稳定性的影响

袁波¹^,²^,⁵(), 徐丽君¹^,^*(), 磋么机¹, 聂莹莹¹, 张洪志¹, 柳新伟¹^,²^,^*(), 杨敏¹^,³, 郭明英⁴

¹ 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所/北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室/内蒙古呼伦贝尔草原生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站，北京 100081
² 青岛农业大学资源与环境学院，山东青岛 266109
³ 都江镇农业农村综合服务中心，贵州三都 558106
⁴ 呼伦贝尔市林业和草原科学研究所，内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021000
⁵ 吐鲁番市高昌区农业技术推广中心，新疆吐鲁番 838000

收稿日期:2025-02-14 接受日期:2025-06-13 出版日期:2025-08-01 发布日期:2025-07-30
通信作者:
徐丽君，E-mail：xulijun@caas.cn。
柳新伟，E-mail：sdxw@163.com
联系方式: 袁波，E-mail：599082927@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(22378422); 中国农业科学院基本科研业务费专项(G2023-01-32); 国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-34-29); 内蒙古自治区科技计划(2023YFDZ0019)

The Impact of Nitrogen Addition on the Species Stability of Artificial Grasslands Under Different Planting Patterns

YUAN Bo¹^,²^,⁵(), XU LiJun¹^,^*(), CUO MeJi¹, NIE YingYing¹, ZHANG HongZhi¹, LIU XinWei¹^,²^,^*(), YANG Min¹^,³, GUO MingYing⁴

¹ Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China/Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Beijing 100081
² College of Resources and Environment, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, Shandong
³ Integrated Agricultural and Rural Service Center of Dujiang Town, Sandu 558106, Guizhou
⁴ Hulunbeir Forestry and Grassland Science Research Institute, Hulunbeir 021000, Inner Mongolia
⁵ Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Gaochang District, Turpan City 838000, Xinjiang

Received:2025-02-14 Accepted:2025-06-13 Published:2025-08-01 Online:2025-07-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】北方农牧交错区是我国重要的农畜产品生产基地和生态安全屏障，分析不同种植模式对草地产量、种间相容性及产量稳定性的影响，以期为揭示氮添加对不同种植模式人工草地的可持续利用性提供科学依据。【方法】基于呼伦贝尔国家野外站长期栽培草地核心试验平台，设置3种种植模式，分别为杂花苜蓿单播（M）、无芒雀麦单播（B）、杂花苜蓿-无芒雀麦1﹕1混播（M﹕B）；设置3种施氮水平，分别为不施氮（CK）、75 kg N·hm^-2（N₇₅）、150 kg N·hm^-2（N₁₅₀）。利用产量、相对产量（RY）、相对产量总和（RYT）、竞争率（CR）、稳定性、异步性等指标，研究人工草地不同种植模式下牧草产量对氮添加的响应。【结果】（1）通过8年长期定位观测，结果显示，N₇₅与N₁₅₀处理前期均显著提高混播草地牧草产量，其中N₁₅₀处理促进了单播草地牧草产量，且不同施氮水平下，混播草地牧草产量和稳定性均高于单播草地。（2）在杂花苜蓿-无芒雀麦混播草地，建植第1—5年杂花苜蓿竞争率>1，建植第6—8年杂花苜蓿竞争率<1，说明建植前期杂花苜蓿竞争力极大，而无芒雀麦后期通过持续养分利用维持系统平衡，这种时序互补性使混播草地牧草产量稳定性提升1.41—1.53倍，异步性提升1.27—1.57倍，进而缓冲产量波动，并且稳定性与异步性呈正比例关系。【结论】物种产量异步性和稳定性是决定混播产量稳定的关键因素。在呼伦贝尔地区建植单播型杂花苜蓿或者无芒雀麦人工草地，建议施氮量150 kg N·hm^-2为宜；建植杂花苜蓿-无芒雀麦混播草地，建议建植初期加大施氮量，以75 kg N·hm^-2为宜。豆禾混播牧草通过互补共生，既有效利用土壤中的养分、提高了牧草产量，同时又实现减少外源氮的施入量，达到促进和维持草地高产状态的目的。

关键词: 氮添加, 人工草地, 种植模式, 产量, 种间相容性, 异步性

Abstract:

【Objective】 The agro-pastoral ecotone in northern China is an important production base for agricultural and livestock products and a crucial ecological security barrier. This study analyzed the effects of different planting patterns on pasture yield, interspecific compatibility, and yield stability, aiming to provide the important scientific evidence for revealing the sustainable utilization of artificially established grasslands under different planting patterns with nitrogen addition.【Method】 Based on the long-term cultivated grassland core experimental platform at the Hulunbuir National Field Station, three planting patterns were established: single sowing of Medicago varia (M), single sowing of Bromus inermis (B), and a 1:1 mixed sowing of Medicago varia and Bromus inermis (M:B). Additionally, three nitrogen application levels were set: no nitrogen (CK), 75 kg N·hm^-2(N₇₅), and 150 kg N·hm^-2 (N₁₅₀). Indicators, such as yield, relative yield (RY), relative yield total (RYT), competition ratio (CR), stability, and asynchrony, were utilized to investigate the response of forage yield to nitrogen addition under different planting patterns in artificial grasslands.【Result】 (1) Through eight years of long-term site-specific observations, the results showed that both N₇₅ and N₁₅₀ treatments significantly increased the forage yield of mixed-sown grasslands in the early stages. Specifically, the N₁₅₀ treatment promoted the forage yield of monoculture grasslands. Moreover, under different nitrogen application levels, the forage yield and stability of mixed-sown grasslands were consistently higher than those of monoculture grasslands. (2) In the mixed-sown grassland of variegated alfalfa and smooth brome, the competition ratio of variegated alfalfa was greater than 1 in the first to fifth year after establishment, and less than 1 in the sixth to eighth year. This indicated that variegated alfalfa was highly competitive in the early stages, while smooth brome maintained system balance through continuous nutrient utilization in the later stages. This temporal complementarity enhanced the forage yield stability of the mixed-sown grassland by 1.41-1.53 times and the asynchrony by 1.27-1.57 times, thereby buffering yield fluctuations. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between stability and asynchrony.【Conclusion】 Species yield asynchrony and stability were key factors determining the stability of mixed-sowing yields. For establishing monoculture artificial grasslands of variegated alfalfa or smooth brome in the Hulunbuir region, it was recommended to apply 150 kg N·hm^-2 of nitrogen. For establishing mixed-sown grasslands of variegated alfalfa and smooth brome, it was advisable to increase the nitrogen application rate to 75 kg N·hm^-2 during the initial establishment phase. Through complementary symbiosis, legume-grass mixed-sown pastures could effectively utilize soil nutrients, increase forage yield, and simultaneously reduce the amount of exogenous nitrogen applied, thereby achieving the goal of promoting and maintaining high pasture productivity.

Key words: nitrogen addition, pastureland, cropping pattern, yield, interspecific compatibility, asynchronism

袁波, 徐丽君, 磋么机, 聂莹莹, 张洪志, 柳新伟, 杨敏, 郭明英. 氮添加对不同种植模式下人工草地产量稳定性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(15): 3007-3019.

YUAN Bo, XU LiJun, CUO MeJi, NIE YingYing, ZHANG HongZhi, LIU XinWei, YANG Min, GUO MingYing. The Impact of Nitrogen Addition on the Species Stability of Artificial Grasslands Under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(15): 3007-3019.

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

图4

图5

参考文献 49

[1]	NIE Y Y, XU L J, XIN X P, YE L M. Long-term grassland diversity-productivity relationship regulated by management regimes in northern China. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 949: 175084.
[2]	XU L J, LI D, WANG D, YE L M, NIE Y Y, FANG H J, XUE W, BAI C L, VAN RANST E. Achieving the dual goals of biomass production and soil rehabilitation with sown pasture on marginal cropland: Evidence from a multi-year field experiment in Northeast Inner Mongolia. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 985864.
[3]	YUAN B, XU L J, WEI J Q, CUO M J, ZHANG H Z, NIE Y Y, GUO M Y, LI J X, LIU X W. Medicago pasture soil C: N: P stoichiometry mediated by N fertilization in northern China. Agronomy, 2025, 15(3): 724.
[4]	JENSEN E S, PEOPLES M B, BODDEY R M, GRESSHOFF P M, HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H, J R ALVES B, MORRISON M J. Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2012, 32(2): 329-364.
[5]	OLIVARES J, BEDMAR E J, SANJUÁN J. Biological nitrogen fixation in the context of global change. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2013, 26(5): 486-494. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-12-0293-CR pmid: 23360457
[6]	谢开云, 张英俊, 李向林, 何峰, 万里强, 王栋, 秦燕. 无芒雀麦和紫花苜蓿在(1: 1)混播中的竞争与共存. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(18): 3767-3778. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.18.020.
	XIE K Y, ZHANG Y J, LI X L, HE F, WAN L Q, WANG D, QIN Y. Competition and coexistence of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and smooth brome(Bromus inermis layss.) in mixture. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(18): 3767-3778. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.18.020. (in Chinese)
[7]	汪爱霞, 马彦麟, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 银敏华, 汪精海, 贾琼, 唐仲霞, 姜渊博. 无芒雀麦与苜蓿混播草地生产力提升的水氮调控模式. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(2): 321-330.
	WANG A X, MA Y L, QI G P, KANG Y X, YIN M H, WANG J H, JIA Q, TANG Z X, JIANG Y B. Water and nitrogen regulation patterns for productivity improvement of bromus inermis and alfalfa mixed grassland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(2): 321-330. (in Chinese)
[8]	WANG L L, XIE J H, LUO Z Z, NIU Y N, COULTER J A, ZHANG R Z, LI L L. Forage yield, water use efficiency, and soil fertility response to alfalfa growing age in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 243: 106415.
[9]	XU L J, YE L M, NIE Y Y, YANG G X, XIN X P, YUAN B, YANG X F. Sown alfalfa pasture decreases grazing intensity while increasing soil carbon: Experimental observations and DNDC model predictions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 1019966.
[10]	崔增. 人工草地对半干旱区农田土壤质量改善及水分效应研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
	CUI Z. Effects of artificial grasslands on soil quality and soil moisture of farmland in semi-arid areas[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[11]	吴宛萍. 混播比例对陇东黄土高原紫花苜蓿/无芒雀麦草地土壤有机碳库的影响[D]. 兰州:兰州大学 2023.
	WU W P. Effect of mixing ratio on soil organic carbon pool of alfalfa/ smooth bromegrass mixture in Longdong Loess Plateau[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2023. (in Chinese)
[12]	郑伟, 朱进忠, 加娜尔古丽, 李海, 张景路. 不同混播方式对豆禾混播草地生产性能的影响. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(5): 45-52.
	ZHENG W, ZHU J Z, JIA N, LI H, ZHANG J L. Effects of different mixed sowing patterns on production performance of legume-grass mixture. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2011, 33(5): 45-52. (in Chinese)
[13]	赵保文, 詹圆, 方嘉琪, 周青平, 汪辉. 混播比例对燕麦与箭筈豌豆生产性能的影响. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(3): 81-90.
	ZHAO B W, ZHAN Y, FANG J Q, ZHOU Q P, WANG H. Mixing ratios effects on production performance and quality in oat and common vetch intercropping systems. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2024, 46(3): 81-90. (in Chinese)
[14]	祁亚淑, 朱林, 许兴. 宁夏绿洲禾豆牧草混播组合及其比例效应. 草业科学, 2015, 32(9): 1463-1472.
	QI Y S, ZHU L, XU X. Effects of mixed combination and proportion between leguminous and graminaceous forages grown in Ningxia desert steppe. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(9): 1463-1472. (in Chinese)
[15]	FOSTER A, VERA C L, MALHI S S, CLARKE F R. Forage yield of simple and complex grass-legume mixtures under two management strategies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2014, 94(1): 41-50.
[16]	FRANKOW-LINDBERG B E, DAHLIN A S. N2 fixation, N transfer, and yield in grassland communities including a deep-rooted legume or non-legume species. Plant and Soil, 2013, 370(1): 567-581.
[17]	许莹月, 侯钰荣, 王静, 周晨烨, 孙宗玖, 朝木力嘎, 柯梅, 王玉祥. 豆禾间行混播对草地生产性能与土壤养分的影响. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(10): 75-86.
	XU Y Y, HOU Y R, WANG J, ZHOU C Y, SUN Z J, ZHAO M L G, KE M, WANG Y X. Effects of intercropping mixture of legume and grass on grassland production performance and soil nutrients. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2024, 46(10): 75-86. (in Chinese)
[18]	刘敏, 龚吉蕊, 王忆慧, 张梓榆, 徐沙, 罗亲普. 豆禾混播建植人工草地对牧草产量和草质的影响. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(1): 179-185.
	LIU M, GONG J R, WANG Y H, ZHANG Z Y, XU S, LUO Q P. Effects of legume-grass mixed sowing on forage grass yield and quality in artificial grassland. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(1): 179-185. (in Chinese)
[19]	LI W J, LI J H, LU J F, ZHANG R Y, WANG G. Legume-grass species influence plant productivity and soil nitrogen during grassland succession in the eastern Tibet Plateau. Applied Soil Ecology, 2010, 44(2): 164-169.
[20]	WICHERN F, MAYER J, JOERGENSEN R G, MÜLLER T. Rhizodeposition of C and N in peas and oats after ¹³C-¹⁵N double labelling under field conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39(10): 2527-2537.
[21]	SHAH Z, SHAH S H, PEOPLES M B, SCHWENKE G D, HERRIDGE D F. Crop residue and fertiliser N effects on nitrogen fixation and yields of legume-cereal rotations and soil organic fertility. Field Crops Research, 2003, 83(1): 1-11.
[22]	DONOHUE I, HILLEBRAND H, MONTOYA J M, PETCHEY O L, PIMM S L, FOWLER M S, HEALY K, JACKSON A L, LURGI M, MCCLEAN D, O’CONNOR N E, O’GORMAN E J, YANG Q. Navigating the complexity of ecological stability. Ecology Letters, 2016, 19(9): 1172-1185. doi: 10.1111/ele.12648 pmid: 27432641
[23]	WANG S P, LAMY T, HALLETT L M, LOREAU M. Stability and synchrony across ecological hierarchies in heterogeneous metacommunities: Linking theory to data. Ecography, 2019, 42(6): 1200-1211.
[24]	YAN Y, CONNOLLY J, LIANG M W, JIANG L, WANG S P. Mechanistic links between biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and stability in a multi-site grassland experiment. Journal of Ecology, 2021, 109(9): 3370-3378.
[25]	张永亮, 张丽娟, 于铁峰, 潘东. 禾豆组合与间作方式对牧草产量及产量稳定性的影响. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5):1410-1418. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.05.037
	ZHANG Y L, ZHANG L J, YU T F, PAN D. Effects of grass-legume combinations and intercropping patterns on the forage yield and yield stability. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 27(5):1410-1418. (in Chinese)
[26]	董世魁. 高寒地区多年生禾草混播草地群落稳定性及其调控机制研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2001.
	DONG S K. The stability of mixture grassland of cultivated perennial grass and its regulation in alpine region of Qinghai-Tibetan plateau of China[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2001. (in Chinese)
[27]	YAN H L, GU S S, LI S Z, SHEN W L, ZHOU X L, YU H, MA K, ZHAO Y G, WANG Y C, ZHENG H, DENG Y, LU G X. Grass- legume mixtures enhance forage production via the bacterial community. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022, 338: 108087.
[28]	王建光. 农牧交错区苜蓿-禾草混播模式研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
	WANG J G. Study on mixed-sowing modes of alfalfa and grasses in the farming pasture region[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012. (in Chinese)
[29]	曾昭海. 豆科作物与禾本科作物轮作研究进展及前景. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(1): 57-61.
	ZENG Z H. Progress and perspective of legume-gramineae rotations. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(1): 57-61. (in Chinese)
[30]	MONTEROS M J, HAN Y, BRUMMER E C. Alfalfa. Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Forage Crops. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014: 187-219.
[31]	ILYAS N, YANG Y J, ZHANG C S, SINGH R P, YU Q G, YUAN Y, YOU X W, LI Y Q. Temporal dynamics and variation in the alfalfa root nodule and rhizosphere microbial communities of coastal sand and lawn soil. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2022, 17(1): 173-182.
[32]	JI S N, LU X W, LI X N, HAUTIER Y, WANG C. Nitrogen addition strengthens the stabilizing effect of biodiversity on productivity by increasing plant trait diversity and species asynchrony in the artificial grassland communities. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1301461.
[33]	王博杰, 唐海萍, 何丽, 林国辉, 赵世杰, 赵明旭. 农牧交错区旱作条件下苜蓿和冰草人工草地稳定性研究. 草业学报, 2016, 25(4): 222-229. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015287
	WANG B J, TANG H P, HE L, LIN G H, ZHAO S J, ZHAO M X. Stability of alfalfa and wheatgrass pasture under dry farming in a pastoral agronomy area. Acta Protoculture Sinica, 2016, 25(4): 222-229. (in Chinese)
[34]	冀超, 殷国梅, 刘思博, 慕宗杰, 薛艳林, 李敬忠, 马春梅, 张英, 杨风兰, 梁叶文. 氮肥水平对紫花苜蓿农艺性状及经济效益的影响. 北方农业学报, 2021, 49(5): 127-134. doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.05.18
	JI C, YIN G M, LIU S B, MU Z J, XUE Y L, LI J Z, MA C M, ZHANG Y, YANG F L, LIANG Y W. Effect of nitrogen levels on alfalfa agronomic traits and economic benefit. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2021, 49(5): 127-134. (in Chinese) doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.05.18
[35]	万井尉. 紫花苜蓿人工草地施肥试验. 现代畜牧兽医, 2015, 1: 10-14.
	WAN J W. Fertilization experiment of alfalfa artificial grassland. Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2015, 1: 10-14. (in Chinese)
[36]	徐然然, 常生华, 贾倩民, SHAHZAD A, 张程, 刘永杰, 侯扶江. 施氮和利用方式对黄土高原禾豆混播草地产量、品质和水分利用的影响. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1744-1755. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.030
	XU R R, CHANG S H, JIA Q M, SHAHZAD A, ZHANG C, LIU Y J, HOU F J. Effects of nitrogen application and utilization methods on yield, quality and water use of grass-legume mixed grassland in loess plateau. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 11: 174-1755. (in Chinese)
[37]	谢开云, 李向林, 何峰, 万里强, 王栋, 秦燕, 余群. 单播与混播下紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦生物量对氮肥的响应. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 148-156. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20140619
	XIE K Y, LI X L, HE F, WAN L Q, WANG D, QIN Y, YU Q. Response of alfalfa and smooth brome to nitrogen fertilizer in monoculture and mixed grasslands. Acta Protoculture Sinica, 2014, 23(6): 148-156. (in Chinese)
[38]	张馨文. 氮添加对荒漠草原生产力及群落稳定性的影响机制[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2022.
	ZHANG X W. Effects and mechanism of nitrogen addition on productivity and community stability in the desert grassland[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2022. (in Chinese)
[39]	才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 牛伊宁, 蔡立群, 谢军红. 中国苜蓿产量及水分利用效率对种植年限响应的Meta分析. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 27-38. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019404
	CAI L, WANG L L, LUO Z Z, LI L L, NIU Y N, CAI L Q, XIE J H. Meta-analysis of alfalfa yield and WUE response to growing ages in China. Acta Protoculture Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 27-38. (in Chinese)
[40]	李裕元, 邵明安, 上官周平, 樊军, 王丽梅. 黄土高原北部紫花苜蓿草地退化过程与植被演替研究. 草业学报, 2006, 15(2): 85-92.
	LI Y Y, SHAO M A, SHANG G Z P, FAN J, WANG L M. Study on the degrading process and vegetati on successi on of Medicagosativa grassland in north loess plateau, China. Acta Protoculture Sinica, 2006, 15(2): 85-92. (in Chinese)
[41]	NUTTALL W F, MCCARTNEY D H, HORTON P R, BITTMAN S, WADDINGTON J. The effect of N, P, S fertilizer, temperature and precipitation on the yield of bromegrass and alfalfa pasture established on a Luvisolic soil. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1991, 71(4): 1047-1055.
[42]	谢开云. 氮素添加对紫花苜蓿和无芒雀麦种间关系及氮素平衡的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
	XIE K Y. Effect of nitrogen addition on interspecific relationship and nitrogen balance of alfalfa and smooth bromegrass[D]. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[43]	WU Q, REN H Y, WANG Z W, LI Z G, LIU Y H, WANG Z, LI Y H, ZHANG R Y, ZHAO M L, CHANG S X, HAN G D, HECTOR A. Additive negative effects of decadal warming and nitrogen addition on grassland community stability. Journal of Ecology, 2020, 108(4): 1442-1452.
[44]	李治国. 紫花苜蓿-无芒雀麦混播群落稳定性及其产量因子模型建立的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2005.
	LI Z G. The study of community stability and the establishment of yield factors model about mix-sowing of Medicago Sativa&Bromus Innermis[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese)
[45]	LOREAU M, DE MAZANCOURT C. Species synchrony and its drivers: neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments. The American Naturalist, 2008, 172(2): E48-E66.
[46]	NIU D C, YUAN X B, CEASE A J, WEN H Y, ZHANG C P, FU H, ELSER J J. The impact of nitrogen enrichment on grassland ecosystem stability depends on nitrogen addition level. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 618: 1529-1538.
[47]	杜忠毓. 水氮添加对荒漠草原植物种间关系及群落稳定性的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2021.
	DU Z Y. Effects of water and nitrogen addition on the plant interspecific association and community stability in the desert grassland[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[48]	HEJCMAN M, ČEŠKOVÁ M, SCHELLBERG J, PÄTZOLD S. The rengen grassland experiment: effect of soil chemical properties on biomass production, plant species composition and species richness. Folia Geobotanica, 2010, 45(2): 125-142.
[49]	MOLINA J A, MARTÍN-SANZ J P, VALVERDE-ASENJO I, SÁNCHEZ-JIMÉNEZ A, QUINTANA J R. Mediterranean grassland succession as an indicator of changes in ecosystem biodiversity and functionality. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2023, 32(1): 95-118.

处理方式 Treatment	牧草产量 Yield of grass (kg·hm^-2)								平均值 Average value
处理方式 Treatment	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	平均值 Average value
M-CK	1725.00±329.13abD	9954.26±1310.15aB	9998.66±862.82aB	7218.33±2878.70aC	9315.65±1059.68bBC	12969.72±375.53aA	10720.28±3095.22aAB	9628.52±1212.77aABC	8941.30±3541.97a
M-N₇₅	2249.63±550.10aB	10337.13±3116.74aA	10989.95±1353.53aA	9555.60±3174.82aA	12089.91±1559.61aA	12701.57±1856.93aA	10852.04±1285.57aA	11777.96±3174.54aA	10069.22±3814.67a
M-N₁₅₀	1385.93±392.70bE	9546.30±2410.74aCD	10938.10±1112.34aBC	7850.00±2368.79aD	10886.94±1614.57abBC	14150.56±1515.30aA	13013.43±2614.56aAB	12257.13±1705.02aABC	10003.55±4176.72a
B-CK	2592.69±628.78aE	15475.00±2669.89aA	9012.59±1325.26aC	4872.22±1256.79aDE	8384.35±2283.31aC	12781.85±1562.70aB	7565.46±1146.32aC	6457.87±1670.56aCD	8392.75±4226.25a
B-N₇₅	1855.28±720.52aD	13648.33±4796.95aA	11305.09±2736.12aAB	3514.63±873.51aD	7441.11±1553.76aC	14047.04±1456.17aA	8882.87±1963.69aBC	7624.17±1328.37aC	8539.81±4718.40a
B-N₁₅₀	2767.69±1030.97aE	13633.80±1387.09aA	11381.67±2043.47aB	5238.70±1347.22aD	7935.93±538.57aC	15451.94±1146.30aA	7364.51±378.68aC	7955.83±1209.02aC	8966.26±4165.87a
M:B-CK	1936.85±567.71aE	12151.11±2944.89aBC	11082.13±1645.66aB	6676.85±2086.63aD	13015.83±2211.19aBC	18254.72±2316.09aA	10426.48±3036.11aCD	11586.20±2144.68aCD	11207.62±5018.71a
M:B-N₇₅	2016.85±371.92aD	11133.33±2308.68aB	12107.59±2171.98abAB	5830.86±1325.76aC	12053.98±826.56aAB	15402.41±3047.63aA	10462.69±2025.77aB	10322.31±1957.68aB	10499.88±4301.56a
M:B-N₁₅₀	2412.04±920.17aD	12298.70±1648.81aBC	14381.85±753.80aB	6165.74±1084.21aC	12009.26±1801.24aA	18610.56±4521.26aA	9286.67±2575.09aC	8982.87±1120.55aC	11140.28±5187.74a

处理方式 Treatment	单播稳定性 The stability of single sowing		混播稳定性 The stability of mixed sowing		混播异步性 The asynchrony of mixed sowing
处理方式 Treatment	2016—2019	2020—2023	2016—2019	2020—2023	2016—2019	2020—2023
M-CK	2.00±0.11aB	5.91±1.73aA	3.21±0.61aB	10.67±3.39aA	0.62±0.04aA	0.56±0.36aA
M-N₇₅	2.26±0.18aB	6.83±1.61aA	2.77±0.57aA	10.43±5.87aA	0.70±0.08aA	0.73±0.54aA
M-N₁₅₀	1.99±0.24aB	7.58±2.65aA	3.02±0.52aB	9.51±3.24aA	0.63±0.08aA	0.41±0.21aA
B-CK	1.65±0.27aB	3.46±0.59aA	4.84±0.63aA	5.41±2.12aA	0.41±0.05aB	1.00±0.29aA
B-N₇₅	1.57±0.40aB	3.65±1.10aA	4.39±1.71aA	5.10±1.00aA	0.39±0.06aB	0.97±0.19aA
B-N₁₅₀	1.85±0.34aB	2.93±0.42aA	4.79±1.11aA	3.70±0.92aA	0.40±0.06aB	0.90±0.02aA
平均值 Average
CK	1.83±0.27aB	4.68±1.78aA	4.02±1.02aB	8.04±3.86aA	0.52±0.11aA	0.78±0.39aA
N₇₅	1.91±0.46aB	5.24±2.11aA	3.58±1.51aA	7.77±4.98aA	0.54±0.17aA	0.85±0.42aA
N₁₅₀	1.92±0.30aB	5.26±3.00aA	3.91±1.24aA	6.61±3.76aA	0.51±0.13aA	0.65±0.29aA

氮添加对不同种植模式下人工草地产量稳定性的影响

The Impact of Nitrogen Addition on the Species Stability of Artificial Grasslands Under Different Planting Patterns

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 49

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	彭廷燊, 陆久焱, 吴美林, 严雨欣, 刘宏周, 南文斌, 秦小健, 李明, 龚俊义, 梁永书. 多年生水稻黄糯2号和长白7号产量相关性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	王玉萍, 符质, 孙佳莹, 穆晓萌, 刘慧淋, 郭进云, 宋文菁, 侯雷平, 赵海亮. 苗期施用褪黑素对番茄短期低温胁迫的缓解作用与应用效果评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[3]	王佳诺, 陈桂平, 李盼, 王丽萍, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文, 赵连豪. 免耕地膜两年覆盖提高绿洲灌区玉米产量的灌浆期光合生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[4]	周新杰, 任昊, 陈应龙, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 过氧化钙对渍涝农田夏玉米根系形态及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[5]	何继航, 张擎, 吕相月, 薛吉全, 徐淑兔, 刘建超. 不同保绿型玉米杂交种氮效率评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[6]	郭富城, 唐海江, 郝馨怡, 马国林, 杨九菊, 黄霖锋, 田蕾, 王彬, 罗成科. 不同灌溉方式对宁夏盐渍化土壤水盐运移、水稻产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[7]	郝琨, 陈洪德, 张威, 钟韵, 党美荣, 朱士江, 黄志坤, 金英. 基于柑橘产量、品质及水氮利用的涌泉根灌水氮综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[8]	延廷霖, 杜娅丹, 胡笑涛, 王贺, 李晓雁, 王玉明, 牛文全, 谷晓博. 加气滴灌下氮肥有机替代对亏缺灌溉棉花产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[9]	蔡廷阳, 朱玉鹏, 李瑞东, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 苗期叶损伤对黄淮海夏大豆光合特性、荚果分布及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
[10]	张志勇, 谭世超, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 韦一昊, 王小纯. 水氮周年优化对豫北灌区小麦玉米轮作系统产量和氮迁移的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 336-353.
[11]	吕旭东, 孙世媛, 李亚楠, 刘玉龙, 王艳群, 付鑫, 张佳英, 宁鹏, 彭正萍. 智能机械化分层施肥对麦田根-土养分分布和小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(1): 129-146.
[12]	陆浩, 张明龙, 韩梅, 严清彪, 李正鹏, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强. 绿肥过腹还田协同氮肥减施提高小麦产量和土壤质量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(1): 147-160.
[13]	叶美金, 陈家婷, 周界光, 尹丽, 胡欣荣, 兰雨昕, 陈斌, 苏龙兴, 刘家君, 刘天超, 李小雨, 马建. 小麦穗密度主效QTL的鉴定、验证及其遗传效应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(1): 17-28.
[14]	董桂春, 王子涵, 王树深, 李杰, 霍晓晴, 杨瑞, 周娟, 舒小伟, 李妍, 曹靓婧, 王子瑞, 姚友礼, 黄建晔. 硫包衣缓释肥提升水稻产量及氮肥利用率的技术途径[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(1): 57-77.
[15]	蒲丽霞, 张佳芮, 叶建萍, 黄秀兰, 樊高琼, 杨洪坤. 二氢赤霉素与秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦分蘖成穗与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1735-1748.