杂交小麦苗期光合特性分析及其对强优势组合的早期预测

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.23.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】通过分析不同杂交小麦组合及其亲本苗期叶片的光合特性与籽粒产量的相关性,为杂交小麦强优势组合早期筛选和预测提供理论依据。【方法】以2个恢复系和4个不育系及其配制的6个杂交小麦组合为材料,在大田种植条件下测定小麦苗期叶片的光合特性,包括净光合速率（P_n）、气孔导度（G_s）、胞间CO₂浓度（C_i）、蒸腾速率（T_r）、水分利用效率（WUE）、叶绿素含量、Rubisco活性及其大小亚基编码基因rbcL、rbcS相对表达量;调查成熟期的产量性状,包括株高、主穗穗长、单株地上生物量、有效穗数、穗粒数、单株籽粒产量、主穗小穗数、千粒重、收获指数,并分析杂种优势以及光合性状与产量性状的相关性。【结果】杂交小麦苗期的净光合速率、气孔导度、蒸腾速率均表现出显著的超高亲优势,其中净光合速率的平均超高亲优势为15.4%,气孔导度为21.3%,蒸腾速率则为11.46%,净光合速率值高的恢复系所配制的杂交组合具有更高的净光合速率和杂种优势,而胞间二氧化碳浓度、水分利用效率则少数有负向优势。成熟期有效穗数、单株籽粒产量及单株生物量具有较高的超高亲优势,其中穗数的超高亲优势值达到最高,平均优势值为34.21%。相关性分析表明,净光合速率与气孔导度、蒸腾速率、单株生物量和单株籽粒产量呈显著或极显著正相关,说明气孔导度、蒸腾速率可辅助筛选高光合小麦,同时苗期净光合速率与产量关系密切。叶绿素含量、Rubisco活性、大小亚基编码基因rbcL、rbcS相对表达量的杂种优势差异较大,其中杂交小麦Rubisco活性均高于双亲,且具有显著的超高亲优势,平均超高亲优势为5.38%。编码基因中,与rbcL相比rbcS具有更高的超高亲优势和中亲优势,而叶绿素含量主要表现为负向优势,少数表现出中亲优势,极少数表现出超高亲优势,且各项指标与净光合速率均无显著相关性。【结论】杂交小麦在苗期已表现出显著的杂种优势,尤其是净光合速率、气孔导度和蒸腾速率,而净光合速率与单株产量、单株生物量显著正相关,因此结合小麦杂交组合的田间表现,苗期净光合速率高低可以作为早期预测杂交组合的产量潜力的参考依据。

关键词: 杂交小麦, 光合作用, 籽粒产量, 杂种优势

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this study was to provide a theoretical basis for early heterosis prediction of hybrid wheat by analyzing photosynthetic characteristics of leaves of different hybrid wheat combinations and their parents at the seedling stage, so that it was easy to select hybrids with strong heterosis. 【Method】 Six hybrid wheat combinations and their parents, including two restorer lines and four male sterile lines, were used as materials to measure the photosynthetic characteristics of wheat leaves at the seedling stage in the field, including net photosynthetic rate (P_n), stomatal conductance (G_s) and intercellular CO₂ concentration (C_i), transpiration rate (T_r), water use efficiency (WUE), chlorophyll content (Chl.), Rubisco content and the relative expression of rbcL and rbcS genes encoding Rubisco subunits as well as their heterosis and correlation. The yield traits were investigated at the wheat maturity stage, including plant height, length of main spike, biomass per plant, spike number per plant, grains per spike, grain yield per plant, spikelets of main spike, thousand grain weight, and harvest index. And then, correlation between grain yield and their photosynthetic characteristics was analyzed. 【Result】 P_n, G_s and T_r of six hybrid wheat showed significant heterosis over high parents. The average heterosis of P_n over high parents was 15.4%, G_s was 21.3%, and T_r was 11.46%. The higher P_n and stronger heterosis of hybrids resulted from the restorer lines with higher P_n, while C_i and WUE of some hybrids showed negative heterosis. The number of spikes per plant, yield per plant and biomass per plant had greater heterosis over high parents, in which the number of spikes per plant performed the highest heterosis with 34.21% on average. Correlation analysis showed that P_n was significantly or super-significantly positively correlated with G_s, T_r, grain yield per plant and biomass per plant, suggesting that G_s and T_r could help to screen high photosynthetic wheat, and P_n at the seedling stage had important relationship with yield. Among them, the Rubisco activity of hybrid wheat was higher than that of its parents, and it had a significant heterosis over high parents, with an average heterosis of 5.38% over high parents. Compared with rbcL, rbcS had a higher over high-parent heterosis and over mid-parent heterosis. The chlorophyll content mainly showed a negative advantage, few over mid-parent heterosis, and very few showed over high-parent heterosis. There was no significant correlation between P_n and other photosynthetic characteristics.【Conclusion】 The results indicated that the leaf photosynthesis of hybrid wheat at the seedling stage showed significant over high-parent heterosis, especially P_n, G_s and T_r, and P_n was significantly positively correlated with the yield per plant and the biomass per plant, so the level of net photosynthetic rate could be one of the important traits for early prediction of yield potential of hybrid combination.

Key words: hybrid wheat, photosynthesis, grain yield, heterosis

李姜玲,杨澜,阮仁武,李中安. 杂交小麦苗期光合特性分析及其对强优势组合的早期预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23): 4996-5007.

LI JiangLing,YANG Lan,RUAN RenWu,LI ZhongAn. Analysis of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Hybrid Wheat at Seedling Stage and Its Use for Early Prediction of Strong Heterosis Combinations[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 4996-5007.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.23.006

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2021/V54/I23/4996

图/表 9

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

图1

表8

参考文献 46

[1]	GODFRAY H C J, BEDDINGTON J R, CRUTE I R, HADDAD L, LAWRENCE D, MUIR J F, PRETTY J, ROBINSON S, THOMAS S M, TOULMIN C. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 2010, 327(5967):812-818. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383
[2]	KEMPE K, RUBTSOVA M, GILS M. Split-gene system for hybrid wheat seed production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(25):9097-9102.
[3]	TESTER M, LANGRIDGE P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science, 2010, 327(5967):818-822. doi: 10.1126/science.1183700
[4]	LI S, YANG D, ZHU Y. Characterization and use of male sterility in hybrid rice breeding. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2007, 49(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/jipb.2007.49.issue-6
[5]	CHEN L, LIU Y G. Male sterility and fertility restoration in crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014, 65(1):579-606. doi: 10.1146/arplant.2014.65.issue-1
[6]	GUPTA P K, BALYAN H S, GAHLAUT V, SARIPALLI G, PAL B, BASNET B R, JOSHI A K. Hybrid wheat: past, present and future. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2019, 132(9):2463-2483. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03397-y
[7]	李中安. 一种以蓝粒为标记性状的两系法杂交小麦的选育方法: CN200610042629.8.(2006-09-06)[2021-02-11].
	LI Z A. A breeding method of two-line hybrid wheat marked by blue grain: CN200610042629.8[P].(2006-09-06)[2021-02-11]. (in Chinese)
[8]	MURCHIE E H, PINTO M, HORTON P. Agriculture and the new challenges for photosynthesis research. The New Phytologist, 2009, 181(3):532-552. doi: 10.1111/nph.2009.181.issue-3
[9]	CHEN X J, MIN D H, TAUQEER A H, HU G Y. Evaluation of 14 morphological, yield-related and physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in Chinese winter bread wheat revealed by analysis of the membership function value of drought tolerance (MFVD). Field Crops Research, 2012, 137:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.008
[10]	TSHIKUNDE N M, MASHILO J, SHIMELIS H, ODINDO A. Agronomic and physiological traits, and associated Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) affecting yield response in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10(5):1428. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01428
[11]	FISCHER R A, REES D, SAYRE K D, CONDON G A, LARQUE S. Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate and cooler canopies. Crop Science, 1998, 38(6):1467-1475. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060011x
[12]	ZHENG T C, ZHANG X K, YIN G H, WANG L N, HAN Y L, CHEN L, HE F, TANG J W, XIA X C, HE Z H. Genetic gains in grain yield, net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance achieved in Henan province of China between 1981 and 2008. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122(3):225-233. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.015
[13]	ZHOU Y, HE Z H, SUI X X, XIA X C, ZHANG X K, ZHANG G S. Genetic improvement of grain yield and associated traits in the northern China winter wheat region from 1960 to 2000. Crop Science, 2007, 47(1):245-253. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0175
[14]	ZHOU Y, ZHU H Z, CAI S B, HE Z H, ZHANG X K, XIA X C, ZHANG G S. Genetic improvement of grain yield and associated traits in the southern China winter wheat region: 1949 to 2000. Euphytica, 2007, 157(3):465-473. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9376-8
[15]	REYNOLDS M P, PASK A J D, HOPPITT W J E, SONDER K, SUKUMARAN S, MOLERO G, PIERRE C S, PAYNE T, SINGH R P, BRAUN H J, et al. Strategic crossing of biomass and harvest index-source and sink-achieves genetic gains in wheat. Euphytica, 2017, 213(11):257-270. doi: 10.1007/s10681-017-2040-z
[16]	刘红梅, 周新跃, 陈杰, 李海林, 邱颖波, 刘建丰. 籼型杂交稻光合特性的杂种优势分析. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(3):122-127.
	LIU H M, ZHOU X Y, CHEN J, LI H L, QIU Y B, LIU J F. Heterosis analysis of photosynthetic characteristics in indica hybrid rice. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2014, 29(3):122-127. (in Chinese)
[17]	赵仁杰, 周紫阳. 高粱杂交种吉杂319及其亲本叶片光合相关参数的比较. 东北农业科学, 2020, 45(2):9-12.
	ZHAO R J, ZHOU Z Y. Comparison of photosynthetic parameters of sorghum hybrid Jiza 319 and its parents. Northeast Agricultural Science, 2020, 45(2):9-12. (in Chinese)
[18]	王秀莉, 胡兆荣, 彭惠茹, 杜金昆, 孙其信, 王敏, 倪中福. 普通小麦光合碳同化与产量性状杂种优势的关系. 作物学报, 2010, 36(6):1003-1010.
	WANG X L, HU Z R, PENG H R, DU J K, SUN Q X, WANG M, NI Z F. Relationship of photosynthetic carbon assimilation related traits of flag leaves with yield heterosis in a wheat diallel cross. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(6):1003-1010. (in Chinese)
[19]	YANG X, CHEN X, GE Q Y, LI B, TONG Y P, LI Z S, KUANG T Y, LU C M. Characterization of photosynthesis of flag leaves in a wheat hybrid and its parents grown under field conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2007, 164(3):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.01.007
[20]	SONG Q H, SU R N, CHAI Y M, BACHIR D G, CHEN L, HU Y. High photosynthetic capability of wheat germplasm with rye chromosome. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2017, 216:202-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.06.012
[21]	吴讷, 陈炫, 姜瑶瑶, 张天烨, 羊健, 朱统泉, 张恒木, 陈剑平. 中国小麦花叶病毒(CWMV)侵染条件下小麦内参基因的选择. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(7):1182-1187.
	WU N, CHEN X, JIANG Y Y, ZHANG T Y, YANG J, ZHU T Q, ZHANG H M, CHEN J P. Selection of reference genes in wheat infected by Chinese wheat mosaic virus (CWMV)s. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensi, 2018, 30(7):1182-1187. (in Chinese)
[22]	许大全. 光合速率、光合效率与作物产量. 生物学通报, 1999, 34(8):8-10.
	XU D Q. Photosynthetic rate, photosynthetic efficiency and crop yield. Chinese Bulletin of Biology, 1999, 34(8):8-10. (in Chinese)
[23]	TOLLENAAR M, AHMADZADEH A, LEE E A. Physiological basis of heterosis for grain yield in maize. Crop Science, 2004, 44(6):2086-2094. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.2086
[24]	WEI G, TAO Y, LIU G Z, CHEN C, LUO R, XIA H A, GAN Q, ZENG H P, LU Z L, HAN Y N, et al. A transcriptomic analysis of super hybrid rice LYP9 and its parents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(19):7695-7701.
[25]	NI Z F, KIM E D, HA M, LACKEY E, LIU J X, ZHANG Y R, SUN Q X, CHEN Z J. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature, 2009, 457(7277):327-331. doi: 10.1038/nature07523
[26]	张其德, 卢从明, 张世平, 张启峰. 几组有优和无优杂交组合中杂交稻及其亲本光合功能的比较. 植物学通报, 1998, 15(1):51-56.
	ZHANG Q D, LU C M, ZHANG S P, ZHANG Q F. The comparison of photosynthetic functions among hybrid rice and their parents in some heterosis and nonheterosis hybrid combinations. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1998, 15(1):51-56. (in Chinese)
[27]	AISAWI K A B, REYNOLDS M P, SINGH R P, FOULKES M J. The physiological basis of the genetic progress in yield potential of CIMMYT spring wheat cultivars from 1966 to 2009. Crop Science, 2015, 55(4):1749-1764. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0601
[28]	TAUSZ-POSCH S, DEMPSEY R W, SENEWEERA S, NORTON R M, FITZGERALD G, TAUSZ M. Does a freely tillering wheat cultivar benefit more from elevated CO₂ than a restricted tillering cultivar in a water-limited environment. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 64:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2014.12.009
[29]	BECHE E, BENIN D, DA SILVA C L, MUNARO L B, MARCHESE J A. Genetic gain in yield and changes associated with physiological traits in Brazilian wheat during the 20th century. European Journal of Agronomy, 2014, 61:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2014.08.005
[30]	SUZUKI Y, KIHARA-DOI T, KAWAZU T, MIYAKE C, MAKINO A. Differences in Rubisco content and its synthesis in leaves at different positions in Eucalyptus globulus seedlings. Plant Cell Environment, 33(8):1314-1323.
[31]	SASANUMA T. Characterization of the rbcS multigene family in wheat: Subfamily classification, determination of chromosomal location and evolutionary analysis. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2001, 265(1):161-171. doi: 10.1007/s004380000404
[32]	RODERMEL S. Subunit control of Rubisco biosynthesis-A relic of an endosymbiotic past. Photosynthesis Research, 1999, 59(2):105-123. doi: 10.1023/A:1006122619851
[33]	DEAN C, PICHERSKY E. DUNSMUIR P. Structure, evolution and regulation of rbcS genes in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1989, 40(1):415-439. doi: 10.1146/arplant.1989.40.issue-1
[34]	EVANS J R. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C₃ plants. Oecologia, 1989, 78(1):9-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00377192
[35]	MAKINO A, MAE T, OHIRA K. Differences between wheat and rice in the enzyme properties of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase and their relationship to photosynthetic gas exchange. Planta, 1988, 174(1):30-38. doi: 10.1007/BF00394870
[36]	杨小苗, 吴新亮, 刘玉凤, 李天来, 齐明芳. 一个番茄EMS叶色黄化突变体的叶绿素含量及光合作用. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6):1983-1989.
	YANG X M, WU X L, LIU Y F, LI T L, QI M F. Analysis of chlorophyll and photosynthesis of a tomato chlorophyll-deficient mutant induced by EMS. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(6):1983-1989. (in Chinese)
[37]	LI Y, REN B, GAO L, DING L, JIANG D, XU X, SHEN Q, GUO S. Less chlorophyll does not necessarily restrain light capture ability and photosynthesis in a chlorophyll-deficient rice mutant. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2012, 199(1):49-56. doi: 10.1111/jac.2013.199.issue-1
[38]	SUZUKI Y, OHKUBO M, HATAKEYAMA H, OHASHI K, YOSHIZAWA R, KOJIMA S, HAYAKAWA T, YAMAYA T, MAE T, MAKINO A. Increased Rubisco content in transgenic rice transformed with the “sense” rbcs gene. Plant Cell Physiology, 2008, 48(4):626-637. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm035
[39]	SUZUKI Y, MIYAMOTO T, YOSHIZAWA R, MAE T, MAKINO A. Rubisco content and photosynthesis of leaves at different positions in transgenic rice with an overexpression of RBCS. Plant Cell Environment, 2010, 32(4):417-427. doi: 10.1111/pce.2009.32.issue-4
[40]	SAWCHUK M G, DONNER T J, HEAD P, SCARPELLA E. Unique and overlapping expression patterns among members of photosynthesis- associated nuclear gene families in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2008, 148(4):1908-1924. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.126946
[41]	YOON M, PUTTERILL J J, ROSS G S, LAING W A. Determination of the relative expression levels of Rubisco small subunit genes in Arabidopsis by rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Analytical Biochemistry, 2001, 291(2):237-244. doi: 10.1006/abio.2001.5042
[42]	SAEED I, BACHIR D G, CHEN L, HU Y G. The expression of TaRca2-α gene associated with net photosynthesis rate, biomass and grain yield in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under field conditions. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(8):e0161308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161308
[43]	DRIEVER S M, SIMKIN A J, ALOTAIBI S, FISK S J, MADGWICK P J, SPARKS C A, JONES H D, LAWSON T, PARRY M, RAINES C A. Increased SBPase activity improves photosynthesis and grain yield in wheat grown in greenhouse conditions. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 2017, 372(1730):1-10.
[44]	LIU J, LI M, ZHANG Q, WEI X, HUANG X. Exploring the molecular basis of heterosis for plant breeding. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2020, 62(3):287-298. doi: 10.1111/jipb.v62.3
[45]	LIU Y J, GAO S Q, TANG Y M, GONG J, ZHANG X, WANG Y B, Zhang L P, Sun R W, Zhang Q, Chen Z B. Transcriptome analysis of wheat seedling and spike tissues in the hybrid Jingmai 8 uncovered genes involved in heterosis. Planta, 2018, 247(6):1307-1321. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2848-3
[46]	BAO J Y, LEE S, CHEN C, ZHANG X Q, YU J. Serial analysis of gene expression study of a hybrid rice strain (LYP9) and its parental cultivars. Plant Physiology, 2005, 138(3):1216-1231. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.060988

亲本及F₁代 Parents and F₁ hybrid		净光合速率 P_n (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	气孔导度 G_s (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)	胞间二氧化碳浓度 C_i (μmol·mol^-1)	水分利用效率 WUE (mmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率 T_r (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)	叶绿素a Chl.a (mg·g^-1)	叶绿素b Chl.b (mg·g^-1)	叶绿素(a+b) Chl.(a+b) (mg·g^-1)
不育系 Male sterile lines	18L7077	28.28	373.78	255.09	13.45	2.10	0.842	0.253	1.095
	15L7084	25.58	340.2	228.01	17.35	1.56	0.848	0.262	1.109
	12L8012	23.72	315.66	271.39	12.11	1.97	0.782	0.245	1.027
	12L8015	22.38	269.2	237.99	14.73	1.54	0.798	0.245	1.043
恢复系 Restorer lines	川麦93 Chuanmai93	24.94	365.86	231.84	15.7	1.64	0.850	0.259	1.108
恢复系 Restorer lines	川14品16 Chuan14pin16	23.53	318.98	233.02	15.32	1.55	0.896	0.269	1.164
F₁代 F₁ hybrid	12L8015×川14品16 12L8015×Chuan 14 pin 16	27.92	434.69	256.59	16.92	1.67	0.851	0.244	1.095
	15L7084×川14品16 15L7084×Chuan 14 pin 16	27.83	439.33	239.79	16.58	1.75	0.826	0.245	1.071
	18L7077×川14品16 18L7077×Chuan 14 pin 16	30.26	454.31	235.03	13.94	2.17	0.809	0.243	1.052
	12L8012×川麦93 12L8012×Chuanmai 93	30.03	454.59	246.35	14.08	2.20	0.808	0.247	1.055
	12L8015×川麦93 12L8015×Chuanmai 93	31.48	461.67	220.00	17.75	1.89	0.778	0.236	1.014
	15L7084×川麦93 15L7084×Chuanmai 93	28.25	396.67	230.21	14.61	1.96	0.859	0.267	1.126
均值 Mean		27.02	385.41	240.44	15.21	1.83	0.829	0.251	1.080
标准差 Std		2.814	62.018	13.874	1.640	0.236	0.033	0.010	0.042
变异系数CV (%)		10.42	16.09	5.77	10.78	12.88	4.04	4.03	3.90
组间差异Difference in combinations (F)		111.460**	438.683**	8.840**	105.507**	59.222**	23.849**	11.24*	12.46**

性状 Trait	超高亲优势 Over high-parent heterosis			中亲优势 Over mid-parent heterosis			超低亲优势 Below low-parent heterosis
性状 Trait	正向组合数 HPH>0	平均 AH (%)	范围 Range (%)	正向组合数 MPH>0	平均 AH (%)	范围 Range (%)	负向组合数LPH<0	平均 AH (%)	范围 Range (%)
净光合速率 P_n	6	15.40	7.00-26.23	6	20.08	11.82-33.05	0	25.34	13.25-40.66
气孔导度 G_s	6	24.30	8.42-36.27	6	35.82	20.35-47.81	0	39.35	16.60-61.47
胞间二氧化碳浓度 C_i	3	-0.61	-9.22-7.82	3	0.16	-6.35-8.95	1	3.04	-5.11-10.11
水分利用效率 WUE	3	-2.67	-15.80-13.06	4	2.88	-11.58-16.67	1	9.42	-9.00-23.27
蒸腾速率 T_r	6	11.36	3.59-19.09	6	16.93	8.00-22.07	0	23.82	8.28-40.43
叶绿素a Chl.a	1	-5.78	-9.72-1.13	2	-2.65	-7.22-1.46	3	0.79	-4.59-8.88
叶绿素b Chl.b	1	-6.44	-9.50-2.17	1	-4.18	-8.32-2.72	4	0.16	-7.11-3.28
叶绿素(a+b) Chl.(a+b)	1	-5.90	-9.67-1.94	1	-3.00	-7.48-1.59	3	0.16	-5.18-6.67

F₁代 F₁ hybrid	净光合速率 P_n	气孔导度 G_s	胞间二氧化碳浓度 C_i	水分利用效率 WUE	蒸腾速率 T_r	叶绿素a Chl.a	叶绿素b Chl.b	叶绿素(a+b) Chl.(a+b)
12L8015×川14品16 12L8015×Chuan 14 pin 16	18.63**	36.28**	7.82*	10.46**	7.73*	-5.01*	-9.13*	-5.96
15L7084×川14品16 15L7084×Chuan 14 pin 16	8.80*	29.14**	2.90	-4.44	11.64**	-9.72**	-9.50*	-9.67*
18L7077×川14品16 18L7077×Chuan 14 pin 16	7.00*	21.54**	3.08	-9.01*	3.59	-7.76*	-8.82*	-8.00*
12L8012×川麦93 12L8012×Chuanmai 93	20.39**	24.25**	-9.23*	-10.34**	11.45**	-4.88	-4.58	-4.81
12L8015×川麦93 12L8015×Chuanmai 93	26.23**	26.19**	-7.56*	13.06**	14.66**	-8.44*	-8.79*	-8.52*
15L7084×川麦93 15L7084×Chuanmai 93	10.44**	8.42*	-0.70	-15.80**	19.09**	1.13	2.17	1.54

性状 Trait	净光合速率 P_n	气孔导度 G_s	胞间二氧化碳浓度 C_i	水分利用效率 WUE	蒸腾速率 T_r	叶绿素a Chl.a	叶绿素b Chl.b
气孔导度 G_s	0.939**
胞间二氧化碳浓度 C_i	-0.534	-0.189
水分利用效率 WUE	0.382	0.396	-0.626*
蒸腾速率 T_r	0.680*	0.559	0.329	-0.196
叶绿素a Chl.a	-0.257	0.002	0.017	0.113	-0.670*
叶绿素b Chl.b	-0.414	-0.269	-0.107	-0.017	-0.619*	0.843**
叶绿素(a+b) Chl.(a+b)	-0.199	-0.062	-0.010	0.082	-0.678*	0.992**	0.904**

性状 Trait	净光合速率 P_n	气孔导度 G_s	胞间二氧化碳浓度 C_i	水分利用效率 WUE	蒸腾速率 T_r	叶绿素a Chl.a	叶绿素b Chl.b	叶绿素(a+b) Chl.(a+b)
杂交小麦组合与不育系值HMC	-0.219	-0.437	0.128	-0.234	-0.704	0.361	0.585	0.416
杂交小麦组合与恢复系值HRC	0.359	-0.508	-0.668	-0.089	-0.177	0.249	-0.313	0.109
杂交小麦组合与中亲值HMPC	-0.192	-0.565	-0.029	-0.239	-0.270	0.374	0.283	0.340