控释尿素基施深度对夏玉米产量和氮素利用的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.21.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究控释尿素不同施肥深度对氮素吸收与利用的影响,明确控释尿素一次性基施在黄淮海夏玉米区实现高产、高效、稳产的适宜施肥深度。【方法】在大田条件下选用郑单958为供试品种,设置不施氮肥（CK）、地表撒施（DP0）、沟施深度5 cm（DP5）、10 cm（DP10）、15 cm（DP15）、20 cm（DP20）、25 cm（DP25）7个处理,系统研究控释尿素基施深度对夏玉米生长发育和产量及氮素利用的影响。【结果】在施用等量控释尿素条件下,施肥深度均对夏玉米产量存在显著影响。夏玉米产量随基施深度增加呈先增后减的趋势,并且2013年和2014年夏玉米产量与施肥深度间的关系符合二次曲线关系,二者的相关性均达到显著水平,2年获得最高产量的理论施肥深度分别为12.5 cm和12.2 cm,而实际生产中DP15处理产量最高,DP15和DP10处理产量差异不显著,较CK分别显著增产16.72%和16.50%（P<0.05）。与DP0处理相比,随施肥深度增加,夏玉米的氮素收获指数、氮肥偏生产力、氮肥农学效率、氮肥利用率均呈现出先增加后降低的趋势,其中氮肥农学效率、氮肥利用率均符合二次曲线关系,氮素收获指数和氮肥农学效率2年平均以DP10处理最大,分别为61.91%和6.68 kg·kg^-1,而氮肥偏生产力、氮肥利用率以DP15处理最高,分别为47.27 kg·kg^-1和46.97%。施肥深度在10 cm和15 cm 较地表撒施（DP0）能增加土壤硝态氮和铵态氮含量并且减少氮素损失,花后氮素积累量2年均值增加38.93%和41.88%,促进了植株花后氮素积累量,并且分别显著增加夏玉米植株总吸氮量20.45%和22.36%。相关性分析可以看出,夏玉米产量与干物质积累量、氮素总积累量、氮肥偏生产力、氮肥农学效率和氮肥利用率均成显著正相关,与氮素籽粒生产效率成显著负相关。【结论】在施氮量为225 kg N·hm^-2时,控释尿素一次性基施深度控制在10—15 cm可显著提高夏玉米的氮素吸收积累量,增加氮素利用效率,降低氮素损失,提高干物质积累量,最终获得较高籽粒产量,实现高产高效,可作为夏玉米控释尿素种肥同播的适宜施肥深度。

关键词: 夏玉米, 控释尿素, 施肥深度, 氮素利用率, 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】 The effects of different fertilization depths of controlled-release urea on nitrogen absorption and utilization were investigated, and then the suitable fertilization depth for achieving high, efficient and stable yield of controlled- release urea in the Huang-Huai-Hai summer maize area was determined.【Method】 Zhengdan958 was selected as the test variety under field conditions, and seven treatments were set, including no nitrogen fertilizer (CK), surface application (DP0), furrow dressing depth of 5 cm (DP5), 10 cm (DP10), 15 cm (DP15), 20 cm (DP20) and 25 cm (DP25). The effects of urea application depth on growth, yield and nitrogen utilization of summer maize were studied systematically.【Result】Under the same amount of controlled-release urea application, the yield of summer maize was significantly affected by fertilization depth. The yield of summer maize increased at first and then decreased with the increase of basal fertilization depth. Moreover, the relationship between maize yield and fertilization depth in the summer of 2013 and 2014 conformed to the quadratic curve and the correlation between them reached a significant level as well. The theoretical fertilization depth that obtained the highest yield was 12.5 cm and 12.2 cm in 2013 and 2014, respectively. While in actual production, the DP15 treatment produced the highest yield with no significant difference between DP15 and DP10 treatment, with a significant increase of 16.72% and 16.50%, separately, compared with CK (P<0.05). Compared with DP0, nitrogen harvest index, partial nitrogen productivity, nitrogen agronomic efficiency and nitrogen utilization rate of summer maize all showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of basal fertilization depth. The agricultural efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer and the utilization rate of nitrogen fertilizer fit the quadratic curve. The nitrogen harvest index and nitrogen fertilizer agronomic efficiency were the largest under DP10 treatment in two years, achieving to 61.91% and 6.68 kg·kg^-1, respectively, however, the highest nitrogen fertilizer efficiency was 47.27 kg·kg^-1 and 46.97% under DP15 treatment, respectively. Compared with DP0, fertilization depth of 10 cm and 15 cm could increase soil nitrate and ammonium nitrogen content and reduce nitrogen loss. The mean value of nitrogen accumulation after flowering was 38.93% and 41.88% in 2013 and 2014, respectively, which promoted the post-flowering nitrogen accumulation and significantly increased the total nitrogen uptake above-ground by 20.45% and 22.36%, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that summer maize yield was significantly positively correlated with dry matter accumulation, total nitrogen accumulation, partial nitrogen productivity, nitrogen agronomic efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency, and significantly negatively correlated with nitrogen grain production efficiency.【Conclusion】 In nitrogen application rate of 225 kg N·hm^-2, controlled release urea one-time basal application depth in 10 to 15 cm could significantly improve nitrogen absorption accumulation of summer maize, increase nitrogen use efficiency, reduce nitrogen loss, improve the dry matter accumulation, eventually obtain higher grain yield. Furthermore, it also realized higher production and efficiency, and could be used as controlled release urea suitable fertilization depth for summer maize sowing and manuring simultaneously.

Key words: summer maize, controlled release urea, base application depth, nitrogen use efficiency, yield

丁相鹏,李广浩,张吉旺,刘鹏,任佰朝,赵斌. 控释尿素基施深度对夏玉米产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21): 4342-4354.

DING XiangPeng,LI GuangHao,ZHANG JiWang,LIU Peng,REN BaiZhao,ZHAO Bin. Effects of Base Application Depths of Controlled Release Urea on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Summer Maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4342-4354.

图/表 9

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

表2

图5

图6

表3

参考文献 38

[1]	WANG S J, LUO S S, YUE S C, SHEN Y F, LI S Q. Fate of ¹⁵N fertilizer under different nitrogen split applications to plastic mulched maize in semiarid farmland. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2016,105:129-140.
[2]	ZHANG W F, DOU Z X, HE P, JU X T, POWLSON D, CHADWICK D, NORSE D, LU Y L, ZHANG Y, WU L, CHEN X P, CASSMAN K G, ZHANG F S. New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013,110(21):8375-8380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210447110 pmid: 23671096
[3]	CAMERON K C, DI H J, MOIR J L. Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: A review. Annals of Applied Biology, 2013,162:145-173.
[4]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):915-924.
	ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, CUI Z L, MA W Q, CHEN X P, JIANG R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008,45(5):915-924. (in Chinese)
[5]	PENG S B, TANG Q Y, ZOU Y B. Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Production Science, 2009,12(1):3-8.
[6]	PENG S B, BURESH R J, HUANG J L, ZHONG X H, ZOU Y B, YANG J C, WANG G H, LIU Y Y, HU R F, TANG Q Y, CUI K H, ZHANG F S, DOBERMANN A. Improving nitrogen fertilization in rice by site-specific N management: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2010,30:649-656. doi: 10.1051/agro/2010002
[7]	CHEN X P, CUI Z L, FAN M S, VITOUSEK P, ZHAO M, MA W Q, WANG Z L, ZHANG W J, YAN X Y, YANG J C, DENG X P, GAO Q, GUO S W, REN J, LI S Q, YE Y L, WANG Z H, HUANG J L, TANG Q Y, SUN Y X, PENG X L, ZHANG J W, HE M R, ZHU Y J, XUE J Q, WANG G L, AN N, WU L Q, MA L, ZHANG W F, ZHANG F S. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 2014,514(7523):486-489. pmid: 25186728
[8]	KETTERING J, RUIDISCH M, GAVIRIA C, OK Y S, KUZYAKOV Y. Fate of fertilizer ¹⁵N in intensive ridge cultivation with plastic mulching under a monsoon climate. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2013,95(1):57-72.
[9]	PATIL M D, DAS B S, BARAK E, BHADORIA P B S, POLAK A. Performance of polymer-coated urea in transplanted rice: Effect of mixing ratio and water input on nitrogen use efficiency. Paddy Water Environ, 2010,8(2):189-198.
[10]	王宜伦, 卢艳丽, 刘举, 苏瑞光, 马龙, 谭金芳, 白由路. 专用缓释肥对夏玉米产量及养分吸收利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(1):29-32.
	WANG Y L, LU Y L, LIU J, SU R G, MA L, TAN J F, BAI Y L. Effects of special slow-release fertilizer on yield and nutrient absorption and utilization of summer maize. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2015(1):29-32. (in Chinese)
[11]	张民, 史衍玺, 杨守祥, 杨越超. 控释和缓释肥的研究现状与进展. 化肥工业, 2001,28(5):27-30.
	ZHANG M, SHI Y X, YANG S X, YANG Y C. Research status and progress of controlled-release and slow-release fertilizer. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2001,28(5):27-30. (in Chinese)
[12]	侯云鹏, 李前, 孔丽丽, 秦裕波, 王蒙, 于雷, 王立春, 尹彩侠. 不同缓/控释氮肥对春玉米氮素吸收利用、土壤无机氮变化及氮平衡的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(20):3928-3940.
	HOU Y P, LI Q, KONG L L, QIN Y B, WANG M, YU L, WANG L C, YIN C X. Effects of different slow/controlled release nitrogen fertilizers on spring maize nitrogen uptake and utilization, soil inorganic nitrogen and nitrogen balance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(20):3928-3940. (in Chinese)
[13]	冯小杰, 战秀梅, 王雪鑫, 陈坤, 彭靖, 韩晓日. 包膜尿素不同配比减施对土壤无机氮含量及玉米氮素吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(10):1733-1745.
	FENG X J, ZHAN X M, WANG X X, CHEN K, PENG J, HAN X R. Effects of soil inorganic nitrogen and nitrogen absorbing by maize under the reduced application of coated urea at different proportions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019,52(10):1733-1745. (in Chinese)
[14]	周丽平, 杨俐苹, 白由路, 卢艳丽, 王磊. 夏玉米施用不同缓释化处理氮肥的效果及氮肥去向. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(8):1527-1536.
	ZHOU L P, YANG L P, BAI Y L, LU Y L, WANG L. Effects of different slow-released nitrogen fertilizers on summer maize and nitrogen fate in the field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(8):1527-1536. (in Chinese)
[15]	赵斌, 董树亭, 王空军, 张吉旺, 刘鹏. 控释肥对夏玉米产量及田间氨挥发和氮素利用率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2009,20(11):2678-2684.
	ZHAO B, DONG S T, WANG K J, ZHANG J W, LIU P. Effects of controlled-release fertilizers on summer maize grain yield field ammonia volatilization and fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009,20(11):2678-2684. (in Chinese)
[16]	王苓, 张民, 刘之广, 耿计彪, 刘备. 不同养分释放期控释尿素掺混后的养分释放特征. 化肥工业, 2017,44(5):5-10, 26.
	WANG L, ZHANG M, LIU Z G, GENG J B, LIU B. Nutrient release characteristics of controlled release urea with different blending proportions at different nutrient release period. Chemical Fertilizer Industry, 2017,44(5):5-10, 26. (in Chinese)
[17]	肖剑, 郑圣先, 易国英. 控释肥料养分释放动力学及其机理研究第3报土壤水分对包膜型控释肥料养分释放的影响(续完). 磷肥与复肥, 2002,17(6):9-12.
	XIAO J, ZHENG S X, YI G Y. Kinetics and mechanism of nutrient release from controlled release fertilizer-Part 3 effect of soil on moisture content on nutrient release of film coated controlled release fertilizer. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2002,17(6):9-12. (in Chinese)
[18]	何婷婷, 汪有科, 史志鹏. 黄土丘陵山地全年覆膜下土壤温度、水分运移规律研究. 西南农业学报, 2019,32(6):1314-1322.
	HE T T, WANG Y K, SHI Z P. Movement law of soil temperature and soil water under annual film mulching in loess hilly region. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019,32(6):1314-1322. (in Chinese)
[19]	余琼, 索炎炎, 司贤宗, 张翔, 李亮, 孙艳敏. 不同缓控释肥种类及施用深度对花生养分积累及产质量的影响. 华北农学报, 2020,35(2):152-160.
	YU Q, SUO Y Y, SI X Z, ZHANG X, LI L, SUN Y M. Effects of different slow controlled release fertilizers and application depth on nutrient accumulation, yield and quality of peanut. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020,35(2):152-160. (in Chinese)
[20]	杨云马, 孙彦铭, 贾良良, 孟春香, 贾树龙. 氮肥基施深度对夏玉米产量、氮素利用及氮残留的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(3):830-837.
	YANG Y M, SUN Y M, JIA L L, MENG C X, JIA S L. Effect of base nitrogen application depth on summer maize yield, nitrogen utilization efficiency and nitrogen residue. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016,22(3):830-837. (in Chinese)
[21]	姜超强, 卢殿君, 王世济, 周健民, 祖朝龙, 王火焰. 夏玉米普通尿素一次施肥位点优化研究. 中国农业科技导报, 2017,19(12):67-74.
	JIANG C Q, LU D J, WANG S J, ZHOU J M, ZU C L, WANG H Y. Research on placement site of urea single application in summer maize. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,19(12):67-74. (in Chinese)
[22]	杜玉奎. 施氮深度对夏玉米根系分布及产量形成的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2015.
	DU Y K. The effect of depth of nitrogen fertilization on root distribution and the yield formation in maize[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[23]	刘晓伟, 陈小琴, 王火焰, 卢殿君, 周健民, 陈照明, 朱德进. 根区一次施氮提高水稻氮肥利用效率的效果和原理. 土壤, 2017,49(5):868-875.
	LIU X W, CHEN X Q, WANG H Y, LU D J, ZHOU J M, CHEN Z M, ZHU D J. Effects and principle of root-zone one-time N fertilization on enhancing rice (Oryza sativa L.) N use efficiency. Soils, 2017,49(5):868-875. (in Chinese)
[24]	周伟, 吕腾飞, 杨志平, 孙红, 杨莨杰, 陈勇, 任万军. 氮肥种类及运筹技术调控土壤氮素损失的研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(9):3051-3058.
	ZHOU W, LÜ T F, YANG Z P, SUN H, YANG L J, CHEN Y, REN W J. Research advances on regulating soil nitrogen loss by the type of nitrogen fertilizer and its application strategy. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(9):3051-3058. (in Chinese)
[25]	郭金金, 张富仓, 王海东, 闫世程, 郑静, 陈东峰, 李志军. 不同施氮量下缓释氮肥与尿素掺混对玉米生长与氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(20):3930-3943.
	GUO J J, ZHANG F C, WANG H D, YAN S C, ZHENG J, CHEN D F, LI Z J. Effects of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer and urea blending on maize growth and nitrogen uptake under different nitrogen application rates. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(20):3930-3943. (in Chinese)
[26]	ZHENG W K, ZHANG M, LIU Z G, ZHOU H Y, LU H, ZHANG W T, YANG Y C, LI C L, CHEN B C. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system. Field Crops Research, 2016,197:52-62.
[27]	张瑞富, 杨恒山, 范秀艳, 张宏宇, 柳宝林, 刘晶. 施磷深度和深松对春玉米磷素吸收与利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(4):880-887.
	ZHANG R F, YANG H S, FAN X Y, ZHANG H Y, LIU B L, LIU J. Effects of phosphorus application depths on its uptake and utilization in spring maize under subsoiling tillage. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018,24(4):880-887. (in Chinese)
[28]	王火焰, 周健民. 根区施肥—提高肥料养分利用效率和减少面源污染的关键和必需措施. 土壤, 2013,45(5):785-790.
	WANG H Y, ZHOU J M. Root-zone fertilization-A key and necessary approach to improve fertilizer use efficiency and reduce non-point source pollution from the cropland. Soils, 2013,45(5):785-790. (in Chinese)
[29]	申丽霞, 王璞, 兰林旺, 孙西欢. 施氮对夏玉米碳氮代谢及穗粒形成的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(6):1074-1079.
	SHEN L X, WANG P, LAN L W, SUN X H. Effect of nitrogen supply on carbon-nitrogen metabolism and kernel set in summer maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007,13(6):1074-1079. (in Chinese)
[30]	安景文, 汪仁, 包红静, 解占军, 华丽民. 不同肥料配方一次性施肥对玉米产量和养分吸收的影响. 土壤通报, 2008,39(4):874-877.
	AN J W, WANG R, BAO H J, XIE Z J, HUA L M. Effects of basal dressing total fertilizers once with different fertilizer formulas on product and nutrient uptake of maize. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2008,39(4):874-877. (in Chinese)
[31]	武鹏, 杨克军, 王玉凤, 张翼飞, 张文超, 吴琼, 陈天宇, 张鹏飞, 庞晨, 王怀鹏, 尹雪巍, 杨丽. 缓释尿素对土壤和玉米植株氮素及干物质和产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018,36(5):94-101.
	WU P, YANG K J, WANG Y F, ZHANG Y F, ZHANG W C, WU Q, CHEN T Y, ZHANG P F, PANG C, WANG H P, YIN X W, YANG L. The effects of slow-release urea on soil and plant nitrogen content, dry matter and yield of maize. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018,36(5):94-101. (in Chinese)
[32]	GENG Y H, CAO G J, WANG S H. Nitrogen accumulation characteristics of high yield spring maize in northeast China. International Journal of Plant Production, 2018,12:149-157.
[33]	刘威, 周剑雄, 谢媛圆, 徐祥玉, 袁家富, 徐芳森, 熊汉锋, 熊又升. 控释尿素不同条施深度下鲜食玉米产量和氮素利用效应. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(1):246-251, 258.
	LIU W, ZHOU J X, XIE Y Y, XU X Y, YUAN J F, XU F S, XIONG H F, XIONG Y S. Yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of fresh edible maize under different fertilization depths of control-release urea. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,32(1):246-251, 258. (in Chinese)
[34]	HE G, WANG Z H, LI F C, DAI J, MA X L, LI Q, XUE C, CAO H B, WANG S, LIU H, LUO L C, HUANG M, MALHI S S. Soil nitrate-N residue, loss and accumulation affected by soil surface management and precipitation in a winter wheat-summer fallow system on dryland. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2016,106(1):31-46.
[35]	NKEBIWE P M, WEINMANN M, BAR-TAL A, MULLER T. Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrient acquisition and yield: A review and meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2016,196:389-401.
[36]	李宗新, 董树亭, 王空军, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 王庆成, 刘春晓. 不同肥料运筹对夏玉米田间土壤氮素淋溶与挥发影响的原位研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(6):998-1005.
	LI Z X, DONG S T, WANG K J, ZHANG J W, LIU P, WANG Q C, LIU C X. In situ study on influence of different fertilization strategies for summer maize on soil nitrogen leaching and volatilization. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007,13(6):998-1005. (in Chinese)
[37]	HU H Y, NING T Y, LI Z J, HAN H F, ZHANG Z Z, QIN S J, ZHENG Y H. Coupling effects of urea types and subsoiling on nitrogen-water use and yield of different varieties of maize in northern China. Field Crops Research, 2013,142:85-94.
[38]	祝清震, 武广伟, 安晓飞, 陈立平, 孟志军, 赵春江. 基肥定深施用装置排肥口位置与施肥深度关系模型. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(13):8-17.
	ZHU Q Z, WU G W, AN X F, CHEN L P, MENG Z J, ZHAO C J. Relationship model of fertilizer outlet location and fertilizer application depth of depth-fixed application device of base-fertilizer. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(13):8-17. (in Chinese)

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	穗长 Ear length (cm)	秃尖长 Bald tip length (cm)	穗粒数 Kernel number per spike	千粒重 Weight of 1000-kernels (g)	产量 Yield (kg·hm^-2)	收获指数 Harvest index
2013	CK	15.97c	0.54a	518.26d	271.4b	8902.5d	0.43b
	DP0	16.24b	0.31ab	540.94c	283.7ab	9954.0bc	0.49ab
	DP5	16.74b	0.17b	544.79bc	285.0ab	10137.5b	0.51a
	DP10	17.22a	0.19b	572.71a	291.8a	10443.0a	0.52a
	DP15	17.11a	0.21b	579.26a	295.6a	10492.5a	0.52a
	DP20	16.91a	0.12b	562.93ab	286.4a	10308.3ab	0.51a
	DP25	16.61b	0.19b	526.83cd	280.3b	9855.0c	0.48ab
2014	CK	16.40a	0.17a	527.73c	301.8c	9315.0d	0.47b
	DP0	17.04a	0.11ab	558.13b	307.0bc	10122.0c	0.48b
	DP5	16.84a	0.10ab	561.53b	317.0ab	10406.5b	0.52ab
	DP10	17.12a	0.03b	579.33a	323.3a	10780.5a	0.55a
	DP15	17.04a	0.07ab	576.26a	326.2a	10790.5a	0.55a
	DP20	16.81a	0.15a	567.48ab	319.6a	10526.2ab	0.54a
	DP25	16.63a	0.09ab	556.75b	306.5bc	10040.5c	0.51ab
方差分析 ANOVA
年份（Y）		NS	**	**	**	**	NS
施肥深度（D）		**	**	**	**	**	*
年份×施肥深度（Y×D）		NS	**	*	*	NS	NS

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	氮素收获指数 NHI (kg·kg^-1)	氮肥偏生产力 NPFP (kg·kg^-1)	氮肥农学效率 NAE (kg·kg^-1)	氮肥利用率 NUE (%)	氮素籽粒生产效率 NGPE (kg·kg^-1)
2013	CK	0.61a	—	—	—	60.50a
	DP0	0.52bc	44.24a	4.67c	27.37c	47.69bc
	DP5	0.50c	45.23a	5.67b	36.74b	45.60bc
	DP10	0.61a	46.41a	6.85a	43.77a	42.51bc
	DP15	0.59ab	46.63a	7.07a	47.15a	41.43c
	DP20	0.61a	46.21a	6.65a	42.00a	43.03bc
	DP25	0.52bc	43.80a	4.23c	23.10c	49.49b
2014	CK	0.58ab	—	—	—	57.50a
	DP0	0.50c	41.40b	4.92c	24.27c	48.11b
	DP5	0.55bc	46.32ab	5.74b	34.20b	44.39bc
	DP10	0.62a	47.14ab	6.51a	44.70a	41.06c
	DP15	0.60ab	47.91a	6.27ab	46.80a	40.13c
	DP20	0.55bc	47.67ab	5.83ab	36.90b	43.37bc
	DP25	0.48c	45.51ab	4.11d	21.00c	48.94b
方差分析 ANOVA
年份（Y）		NS	**	**	**	**
施肥深度（D）		**	**	**	**	**
年份×施肥深度（Y×D）		NS	**	*	*	NS

	产量 Yield	干物质积累量 Dry accumulation amount	氮素总积累量 Total N accumulation	氮肥偏生产力 NPFP	氮肥农学效率 NAE	氮肥利用率 NUE	氮素籽粒生产效率NGPE
产量 Yield	1
干物质积累量 Dry accumulation amount	0.990**	1
氮素总积累量 Total N accumulation	0.981**	0.993**	1
氮肥偏生产力 NPFP	0.943**	0.896**	0.869*	1
氮肥农学效率 NAE	0.998**	0.990**	0.981**	0.943**	1
氮肥利用率 NUE	0.981**	0.993**	0.998**	0.869*	0.981**	1
氮素籽粒生产效率 NGPE	-0.993**	-0.996**	-0.997**	-0.905**	-.993**	-0.997**	1