模拟降水条件下生物炭对酸性红壤理化性质的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】明确降水条件下生物炭对红壤理化性状的影响。【方法】采用室内模拟降水的方法，将以花生壳为原料在400℃热解制备的生物炭施入红壤，在气温25—30℃、单次降水量20 mm条件下进行连续试验约20 d，分析生物炭对施肥和未施肥红壤的速效钾（SAK）、速效磷（SAP）、铵态氮（SAN）、硝态氮（SAN）、有机碳（SOC）、活性铝（SAA）以及pH值在降水前后的变化。共设8个试验处理：未施肥+未施C（CK）、未施肥+1%生物炭（C1）、未施肥+2%生物炭（C2）、未施肥+3%生物炭（C3）；施肥+未施C（F）、施肥+1%生物炭（FC1）、施肥+2%生物炭（FC2）、施肥+3%生物炭（FC3）。施肥土壤施用KH₂PO₄0.14 g·kg^-1、KNO₃0.51 g·kg^-1、NH₄NO₃ 0.80 g·kg^-1和Ca(NO₃)₂0.95 g·kg^-1。【结果】施用生物炭的红壤，其速效钾、速效磷、硝态氮、铵态氮、活性铝、有机质和pH等指标在降水后均有较大变化，且不同生物炭用量对红壤理化性质的影响存在较大差异。施用3%生物炭时，土壤理化性质在降水前后变化最为显著，C3处理的pH值比CK处理提高了0.60个单位，速效钾的下降幅度比CK少9.5%，速效磷、硝态氮的下降幅度分别比CK高出33.2%和40.5%，有机碳和铵态氮则没有明显变化，活性铝下降了91.1%。而降水后FC3处理的pH值比F处理提高了1.09个单位，速效钾的下降幅度比对照少10.3%，速效磷和硝态氮的下降幅度分别比F处理高23.4%和21.9%，有机碳和铵态氮的增幅分别比F处理高23.6%和5.4%，活性铝下降了94.8%。【结论】在降水条件下，生物炭有利于酸性红壤保持适宜的速效钾含量，提高土壤pH值和有机碳含量，以及能大幅降低土壤活性铝浓度，且对施肥后酸性红壤理化性质的影响更明显。

关键词: 生物炭, 模拟降水, 红壤, 土壤理化性状, 施肥

Abstract: 【Objective】 Purposes of this study are to determine if biochar has effects on red soil under precipitation conditions, and the difference between no-fertilization soil and fertilization soil.【Method】A rainfall simulation experiment was carried out with different biochar levels (biochar/soil: 0%, 1%, 2% and 3%) on red soil, and some characters such as soil available phosphorus (SAP), available potassium (SAK), nitrate nitrogen (SNN), ammonium nitrogen (SAN), organic carbon (SOC) and active aluminum (SAA) were determined.【Result】Under precipitation conditions, the variation of SAN, SOC, SAA and pH in red soil was observably. When 3% biochar was added, the change of soil characters was most significantly. Compared with the no-fertilization control (CK), soil pH raised by 0.60, SAA decreased by 91.1%, the descent range of SAK decreased by 9.5%, the descent ranges of SAP and SNN, respectively, increased by 33.2%, 40.5% in no-fertilization soil with 3% biochar application. Compared with the fertilization control (F), soil pH raised by 1.09, SAA decreased by 94.8%, the descent range of SAK decreased by10.3%, the descent ranges of SAP and SNN, respectively, increased by 23.4% and 21.9%, SOC and SAN, respectively, increased by 23.6% and 5.4% in fertilization soil with 3% biochar application rate.【Conclusion】Under precipitation conditions, biochar was propitious to maintain SAP, improved soil pH and SOC, and decreased SAA, especially in red soil with fertilizer application.

Key words: biochar, simulating rainfall, red soil, soil characters, fertilization

朱盼，应介官，彭抒昂，姜存仓. 模拟降水条件下生物炭对酸性红壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(5): 1035-1040.

ZHU Pan, YING Jie-guan, PENG Shu-ang, JIANG Cun-cang. Effects of Biochar on Physico-Chemical Properties of Acid Red Soil Under Simulated Rainfall Condition[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(5): 1035-1040.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.05.21

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2015/V48/I5/1035

参考文献

[1] 赵其国, 黄国勤, 马艳芹. 中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策. 生态学报, 2013, 33(24): 7615-7622.

Zhao Q G, Huang G Q, Ma Y Q. The problems in red soil ecosystem in southern of China and its countermeasures. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(24): 7615-7622. (in Chinese)

[2] 袁金华, 徐仁扣. 生物质炭对酸性土壤改良作用的研究进展. 土壤, 2012, 44(4): 541-547.

Yuan J H, Xu R K. Research progress of amelioration effects of biochars on acid soils. Soils, 2012, 44(4): 541-547. (in Chinese)

[3] Yuan J H, Xu R K, Wang N, Li J Y. Amendment of acid soil with crop residues and biochars. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(3): 302-308.

[4] Li X M, Shen Q R, Zhang D Q, Mei X L, Ran W, Xu Y C, Yu G H. Functional groups determine biochar properties (pH and EC) as studied by two-dimensional 13C NMR correlation spectroscopy. PLoS One, 2013, 8(6): 1-8.

[5] Gaskin J W, Steiner C, Harris K, Das K C, Bibens B. Effects of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2008, 51(6): 2061-2069.

[6] 马莉, 吕宁, 冶军, 茹思博, 李国峰, 侯振安. 生物碳对灰漠土有机碳及其组分的影响. 中国农业生态报, 2012, 20(8): 976-981.

Ma L, Lü N, Ye J, Ru X B, Li G F, Hou Z A. Effects of biochar on organic carbon content and fractions of gray desert soil. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(8): 976-981. (in Chinese)

[7] Wang J Y, Pan X J, Liu Y L, Zhang X L, Xiong Z Q. Effects of biochar amendment in two soils on greenhouse gas emissions and crop production. Plant and Soil, 2012, 360(1/2): 287-298.

[8] Schulz H, Dunst G, Glaser B. Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growthand soil fertility. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2013, 33: 817-827.

[9] Illingworth J, Williams P T, Rand B. Characterisation of biochar porosity from pyrolysis of biomass flax fibre. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2013, 86(2): 63-70.

[10] 黄超, 刘丽君, 章明奎. 生物质炭对红壤性质和黑麦草生长的影响. 浙江大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2011, 37(4): 439-445.

Huang C , Liu L J, Zhang M K. Effects of biochar on properties of red soil and ryegrass growth. Journal of Zhejiang University: Agriculture & Life Science, 2011, 37(4):439-445. (in Chinese)

[11] 张祥, 王典, 姜存仓, 朱盼, 雷晶, 彭抒昂. 生物炭对我国南方红壤和黄棕壤理化性质的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(8): 979-984.

Wang D, Zhang X, Jiang C C, Zhu P, Lei J, Peng S A. Effect of biochar on physicochemical properties of red and yellow brown soils in the South China Region. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(8): 979-984. (in Chinese)

[12] 李际会, 吕国华, 白文波, 国金义, 宋吉青, 张庆忠. 改性生物炭的吸附作用及其对土壤硝态氮和有效磷淋失的影响. 中国农业气象, 2012, 33(2): 220-225.

Li J H, Lü G H, Bai W B, Guo J Y, Song J Q, Zhang Q Z. Effect of modified biochar on soil nitrate nitrogen and available phosphorus leaching. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2012, 33(2):220-225. (in Chinese)

[13] Novak J M, Busscher W J, Laird D L, Ahmedna M, Watts D W, Niandou M A S. Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Soil Science, 2009, 174(2): 105-112.

[14] 廖红玲, 张智勇, 谢远玉. 近48年赣州市降水量变化特征分析. 江西农业学报, 2010, 22(10): 97-100.

Liao H L, Zhang Z Y, Xie Y Y. Analysis of characteristics of Ganzhou precipitation changes nearly 48 years. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2010, 22(10): 97-100. (in Chinese)

[15] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.

Bao S D. Soil Agro-Chemical Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005.

[16] 王虹. 土壤活性硅铝的测定与方法改进. 土壤通报, 1986, 3: 135-137.

Wang H. The determination of active silicon and aluminum soil and the method of improvement. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1986, 3:135-137. (in Chinese)

[17] Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan K. Y, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil, 2010, 327: 235-246.

[18] Williams B J, Peterson J C, Utzinger J D. Liming reaction in sphagnum peat-based growing media. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1988, 113:210-214..

[19] Glaser B. Manioc peel and charcoal: a potential organic amendment for sustainable soil fertility in the tropics. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 2005, 41: 15-21.

[20] Sierra J, Noel C, L’Ozier-Lafontaine D H, Welcker C, Desfontaines L. Mineral nutrition and growth of tropical maize as affected by soil acidity. Plant and Soil, 2003, 252(2): 215-226.

[21] Broschat T K. Nitrate, phosphate, and potassium leaching from container-grown plants fertilized by several methods. HortScience, 1995, 30:74-77.

[22] Yao Y, Gao B, Zhang M, Inyang M, Zimmerman A R. Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere, 2012, 89 (11): 1467-1471.

[23] Kameyama K, Miyamoto T, Shiono T, Shinogi Y. In?uence of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar application on nitrate leaching in calcaric dark red soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2012, 41: 1131-1137.

[24] Doydora S A, Cabrera M L, Das K C, Gaskin J W, Sonon L S, Miller W P. Release of nitrogen and phosphorus from poultry litter amended with acidified biochar. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011, 8(5): 1491-1502.

[25] Knowles O A, Robinson B H, Contangelo A, Clucas L. Biochar for the mitigation of nitrate leaching from soil amended with biosolids. Science of the Total Environment, 2011, 409: 3206-3210.

[26] Lehmann J, da Silva Jr J P, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological anthrosol and a ferralsol of Central Amazonia: fertilizer, and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil, 2003, 249: 343-357.

[27] Lehmann J. Bio-energy in the black. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2007, 5: 381-387.

[28] Mizuta K, Matsumoto T, Hatate Y, Nishihara K, Nakanishi T. Removal of nitrate nitrogen from drinking water using bamboo powder charcoal. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 95: 255-257.

[29] Cao X D, Harris W. Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101: 5222-5228.

[30] Hua L, Lu Z Q, Ma H R, Jin S S. Effect of biochar on carbon dioxide release, organic carbon accumulation, and aggregation of soil. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 2014, 33(3): 941-946.