农艺措施对干旱区棉田土壤有机碳及微生物量碳含量的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.22.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探讨干旱区绿洲棉田农艺措施对土壤有机碳（SOC）及微生物量碳含量（MBC）的影响，揭示农艺措施对农田生态系统土壤碳稳定性的影响机制，为干旱区农业资源高效利用及可持续发展提供理论依据。【方法】试验采用裂裂区设计，以膜下滴灌和常规漫灌2种灌溉方式为主区，秸秆还田与秸秆不还田2种处理为裂区，4种施肥处理：单施有机肥（为腐熟鸡粪，OM）、单施氮磷钾化肥（NPK）、氮磷钾化肥与有机肥配施（NPK+OM）和不施肥（CK）为裂裂区。于棉花出苗后开始测定土壤异氧呼吸强度，并于每年棉花收获期采集土壤样品，测定和分析不同农艺措施下绿洲棉田土壤有机碳及微生物量碳含量。【结果】干旱区绿洲棉田不同农艺措施两两交互及3种措施交互作用下土壤有机碳、微生物量碳含量差异均不显著（P＞0.05）。土壤有机碳、微生物量碳含量表层0—20 cm含量均最高，其下层随着土壤深度的增加呈逐渐降低的趋势，至40—60 cm土层降至最低。不同农艺措施下，土壤有机碳含量变化表现为，与常规漫灌方式相比，膜下滴灌方式增加了2.5%—3.0%，秸秆还田比秸秆不还田增加了2.3%—6.3%，与CK处理相比，（NPK+OM）处理土壤有机碳含量增加了14.3%—16.8%，且（NPK+OM）/OM处理土壤有机碳含量显著大于CK/NPK处理（P＜0.05）。土壤微生物量碳含量为膜下滴灌方式比常规漫灌方式增加了21.9%—34.3%，秸秆还田比秸秆不还田增加了12.1%—29.4%，与CK处理相比，（NPK+OM）处理土壤微生物量碳含量增加了83.9%—151.0%。棉田土壤微生物熵（qMB）的大小变化在灌溉处理间表现为膜下滴灌>常规漫灌方式，秸秆处理间为秸秆还田>秸秆不还田处理，施肥处理间土壤微生物熵在0—40 cm土层显著大于40—60 cm土层，且不同土层间（NPK+OM）处理土壤微生物熵为最大，其次分别为OM、NPK、CK处理。棉田土壤微生物代谢熵（qCO₂）大小变化在不同灌溉处理间表现为膜下滴灌低于常规漫灌方式，秸秆处理间为秸秆还田低于秸秆不还田处理，施肥处理间为（NPK+OM）P＜0.05）。不同农艺措施间互作，膜下滴灌方式及秸秆还田措施下，（NPK+OM）处理棉田土壤微生物代谢熵最低。【结论】干旱区棉花生产中，采用膜下滴灌节水技术，氮磷钾化肥和有机肥配施，并实施秸秆还田等农田管理措施，可使土壤质量得到进一步改善，有利于农田土壤的可持续利用。

关键词: 干旱区, 棉花, 农艺措施, 棉田, 土壤有机碳, 微生物量碳

Abstract: 【Objective】To reveal the regulatory mechanism of agronomic measures on soil carbon stability of the agro-ecosystem in arid region, an experiment was carried out to study the effects of agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) of cotton fields, which would a provide theoretical basis for agricultural resources utilization and sustainable development in the oasis arid region.【Method】In this study, the split-split plot design method was used to arrange the treatments during cotton growth period. In the main plot treatment, two irrigation methods were designed: drip irrigation and flood irrigation. The split-plot treatment consisted of two stubble management measures: stubble-incorporated and stubble-removed. The split-split-plot treatment was composed of four fertilizer treatments: organic manure (chicken manure, which was composted before utilization, OM), N P K fertilizer (NPK), combined application of NPK fertilizer and organic manure (NPK+OM), and no fertilization (CK). The soil heterotrophic respiration intensity was measured after emergence of the cotton seedling, and soil samples were collected in the annual cotton harvest period. The soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon of cotton fields were measured under different agronomic measures.【Result】Both soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon were not significant under the condition of interaction between different agronomic measures (P＞0.05). The soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon at 0-20 cm surface soil were the highest, with lower distribution trends as soil layer depth increased of cotton field, and reduced to lowest at 40-60 cm soil layer in the oasis arid region. The soil organic carbon under conventional flood irrigation was 2.5%-3.0% more than that under drip irrigation under mulch, and under stubble incorporation was 2.3%-6.3% more than that under stubble removal, and as compared with CK treatment, the soil organic carbon under NPK+OM fertilization increased by 14.3%-16.8%, and the soil organic carbon of (NPK + OM) and OM treatment were significantly greater than CK and NPK treatment (P＜0.05). The microbial biomass carbon under drip irrigation under mulching was 21.9%-34.3% more than that under conventional flood irrigation method, and under stubble incorporation was 12.1%-29.4% more than that under stubble removal, and as compared with CK treatment, the microbial biomass carbon under NPK+OM fertilization increased by 83.9%-151.0%. The soil microbial quotient (qMB) was larger under drip irrigation under mulching than those under conventional flood irrigation among the irrigation treatments, and the soil microbial quotient was larger with stubble incorporation relative to removal among the stubble treatments, and the soil microbial quotient at 0-40 cm soil layer was larger than that 40-60 cm soil layer among the fertilization treatments, and the soil microbial quotient was the highest under NPK+OM fertilization, and OM, CK, and NPK, respectively. The soil microbial metabolic quotient (qCO₂) was smaller under drip irrigation under mulching than under conventional flood irrigation among the irrigation treatments, and the soil microbial metabolic quotient was smaller with stubble incorporation relative to removal among the stubble treatments, and lowest under NPK+OM fertilization (followed by OM, NPK, and CK) among the fertilization treatments, and the soil microbial metabolic quotient of (NPK + OM) treatment was significantly compared with other fertilization treatments (P＜0.05). Under the conditions of interaction between different agronomic measures, the soil microbial metabolic quotient was the lowest in the NPK+OM treatment with stubble incorporation under drip irrigation under mulching.【Conclusion】In arid region, cotton production using reasonable agronomic measures, such as water saving technology of drip irrigation under mulching, combined with application of NPK fertilizer and organic manure and straw incorporation, could not only further improve soil quality, but are also be conducive to the sustainable utilization of agricultural soils.

Key words: arid region, cotton, agronomic measures, cotton field, soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC)

张前兵，杨玲，张旺锋，罗宏海，张亚黎，王进. 农艺措施对干旱区棉田土壤有机碳及微生物量碳含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(22): 4463-4474.

ZHANG Qian-bing, YANG Ling, ZHANG Wang-feng, LUO Hong-hai, ZHANG Ya-li, WANG Jin. Effects of Agronomic Measures on Soil Organic Carbon and Microbial Carbon Content in Cotton in Arid Region[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(22): 4463-4474.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.22.012

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2014/V47/I22/4463

参考文献

[1] Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 2004, 304: 1623-1627.

[2] Houghton R A, Skole D L, Nobre C A, Hackler J L, Lawrence K T, Chomentowski W H. Annual fluxes of carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature, 2000, 403(6767): 301-304.

[3] 潘根兴, 李恋卿, 郑聚锋, 张旭辉, 周萍. 土壤碳循环研究及中国稻田土壤固碳研究的进展与问题. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 901-914.

Pan G X, Li L Q, Zheng J F, Zhang X H, Zhou P. Perspectives on cycling and sequestration of organic carbon in paddy soils of China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 901-914. (in Chinese)

[4] Smith P. Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems, 2008, 81(2): 169-178.

[5] 柴仲平, 梁智, 王雪梅, 贾宏涛. 不同灌溉方式对棉田土壤物理性质的影响. 新疆农业大学学报, 2008, 31(5): 57-59.

Chai Z P, Liang Z, Wang X M, Jia H T. The influence of the different methods of irrigation on the soil physical properties in cotton field. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2008, 31(5): 57-59. (in Chinese)

[6] 张明园, 魏燕华, 孔凡磊, 陈阜, 张海林. 耕作方式对华北农田土壤有机碳储量及温室气体排放的影响. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(6): 203-209.

Zhang M Y, Wei Y H, Kong F L, Chen F, Zhang H L. Effects of tillage practices on soil carbon storage and greenhouse gas emission of farmland in North China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012, 28(6): 203-209. (in Chinese)

[7] 芦思佳, 韩晓增, 尤孟阳, 朱巍巍. 施肥对黑土密度分组中碳、氮的影响. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(2): 177-180.

Lu S J, Han X Z, You M Y, Zhu W W. Distribution of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in density fractions on black soil as affected by fertilization. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(2): 177-180. (in Chinese)

[8] 赵鑫, 宇万太, 李建东, 姜子绍. 不同经营管理条件下土壤有机碳及其组分研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(11): 2203-2209.

Zhao X, Yu W T, Li J D, Jiang Z S. Research advances in soil organic carbon and its fractions under different management patterns. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(11): 2203-2209. (in Chinese)

[9] 陈朝, 吕昌河, 范兰, 武红. 土地利用变化对土壤有机碳的影响研究进展. 生态学报, 2011, 31(18): 5358-5371.

Chen Z, Lu C H, Fan L, Wu H. Effects of land use change on soil organic carbon: a review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(18): 5358-5371. (in Chinese)

[10] 苏永中, 杨荣, 杨晓, 范桂萍. 农业管理措施对新垦荒漠沙地农田土壤有机碳及其组分的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(14): 2867-2876.

Su Y Z, Yang R, Yang X, Fan G P. Effects of agricultural management practices on soil organic carbon and its fractions in newly cultivated sandy soil in northwest China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(14): 2867-2876. (in Chinese)

[11] 马富裕, 周治国, 郑重, 郑旭荣, 李明思, 李正尚, 张卫国, 邢明亮, 夏东利. 新疆棉花膜下滴灌技术的发展与完善. 干旱地区农业研究, 2004, 22(3): 202-208.

Ma F Y, Zhou Z G, Zheng Z, Zheng X R, Li M S, Li Z S, Zhang W G, Xing M L, Xia D L. The development and improvement of drip irrigation under plastic film on cotton. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2004, 22(3): 202-208. (in Chinese)

[12] 贡璐, 张海峰, 吕光辉, 杜东伟. 塔里木河上游典型绿洲不同连作年限棉田土壤质量评价. 生态学报, 2011, 31(14): 4136-4143.

Gong L, Zhang H F, Lu G H, Du D W. Soil quality assessment of continuous cropping cotton fields for different years in a typical oasis in the upper reaches of the Tarim River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(14): 4136-4143. (in Chinese)

[13] 唐光木, 徐万里, 盛建东, 梁智, 周勃, 朱敏. 新疆绿洲农田不同开垦年限土壤有机碳及不同粒径土壤颗粒有机碳变化. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(2): 279-285.

Tang G M, Xu W L, Sheng J D, Liang Z, Zhou B, Zhu M. The variation of soil organic carbon and soi particle-size in Xinjiang oasis farmland of different years. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(2): 279-285. (in Chinese)

[14] 徐万里, 唐光木, 盛建东, 梁智, 周勃, 朱敏. 垦殖对新疆绿洲农田土壤有机碳组分及团聚体稳定性的影响. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7): 1773-1779.

Xu W L, Tang G M, Sheng J D, Liang Z, Zhou B, Zhu M. Effects of cultivation on organic carbon fractionation and aggregate stability in Xinjiang oasis soils. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(7): 1773-1779. (in Chinese)

[15] 新疆统计局. 新疆统计年鉴2011. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2011.

Statistics Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook-2011. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2011. (in Chinese)

[16] 张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 李少昆, 曹连莆, 王登伟. 氮肥对新疆高产棉花群体光合性能和产量形成的影响. 作物学报, 2002, 28(6): 789-796.

Zhang W F, Wang Z L, Yu S L, Li S K, Cao L P, Wang D W. Effect of nitrogen on canopy photosynthesis and yield formation in high- yielding cotton of Xinjiang. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28(6): 789-796. (in Chinese)

[17] 韩琳, 张玉龙, 金烁, 王娇, 魏岩岩, 崔宁, 魏巍. 灌溉模式对保护地土壤可溶性有机碳与微生物量碳的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(8): 1625-1633.

Han L, Zhang Y L, Jin S, Wang J, Wei Y Y, Cui N, Wei W. Effect of different irrigation patterns on soil dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in protected field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(8): 1625-1633. (in Chinese)

[18] 王成己, 潘根兴, 田有国, 李恋卿, 张旭辉, 韩晓君. 不同施肥下农田表土有机碳含量变化分析: 基于中国农业生态系统长期试验资料. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2010, 40(7): 650-657.

Wang C J, Pan G X, Tian Y G, Li L Q, Zhang X H, Han X J. Changes in cropland topsoil organic carbon with different fertilizations under long-term agro-ecosystem experiments across mainland China. Science China: Life Sciences, 2010, 40(7): 650-657. (in Chinese)

[19] Yeomansa J C, Bremnera J M. A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1988, 19(13): 1467-1476.

[20] Vance E D, Brookesp C, Jenkinson D C. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19: 703-707.

[21] Anderson J P E, Domsch K H. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1978, 10: 215-221.

[22] Xu M, Qi Y. Soil-surface CO₂ efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7: 667-677.

[23] 金琳, 李玉娥, 高清竹, 刘运通, 万运帆, 秦晓波, 石锋. 中国农田管理土壤碳汇估算. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(3): 734-743.

Jin L, Li Y E, Gao Q Z, Liu Y T, Wan Y F, Qin X B, Shi F. Estimate of carbon sequestration under cropland management in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(3): 734-743. (in Chinese)

[24] 潘根兴, 赵其国. 我国农田土壤碳库演变研究: 全球变化和国家粮食安全. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(4): 384-393.

Pan G X , Zhao Q G. Study on evolution of organic carbon stock in agricultural soils of China: facing the challenge of global change and food security. Advances in Earth Science, 2005, 20(4): 384-393. (in Chinese)

[25] 张璐, 张文菊, 徐明岗, 蔡泽江, 彭畅, 王伯仁, 刘骅. 长期施肥对中国 3 种典型农田土壤活性有机碳库变化的影响. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(5): 1646-1655.

Zhang L, Zhang W J, Xu M G, Cai Z J, Peng C, Wang B R, Liu H. Effects of long-term fertilization on change of labile organic carbon in three typical upland soils of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(5): 1646-1655. (in Chinese)

[26] Masto R E, Chhonkar P K, Singh D, Patra A K. Changes in soil biological and biochemical characteristics in a long-term field trial on a sub-tropical inceptisol. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38: 1577-1582.

[27] Puri G, Ashman M R. Relationship between soil microbial biomass and gross N mineralization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1992, 30: 251-256.

[28] Muhammad S, Müller T, Joergensen R G. Decomposition of pea and maize straw in Pakistani soils along a gradient in salinity. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2006, 43: 93-101.

[29] Albiach R, Canet R, Pomanes F, Ingelmo F. Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after the application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresource Technology, 2000, 75(1): 43-48.

[30] Chu H Y, Lin X G, Fujii T, Morimoto S, Yagi K, Hu J L, Zhang J B. Soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, bacterial community structure in response to long-term fertilizer management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39(11): 2971-2976.

[31] 李娟, 赵秉强, 李秀英, 姜瑞波, SO Hwat Bing. 长期不同施肥制度下几种土壤微生物学特征变化. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 891-899.

Li J, Zhao B Q, Li X Y, Jiang R B, So H B. Changes of soil microbial properties affected by different long-term fertilization regimes. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(4): 891-899. (in Chinese)

[32] 卜洪震, 王丽宏, 尤金成, 肖小平, 杨光立, 胡跃高, 曾昭海. 长期施肥管理对红壤稻田土壤微生物量碳和微生物多样性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(16): 3340-3347.

Bu H Z, Wang L H, You J H, Xiao X P, Yang G L, Hu Y G, Zeng Z H. Impact of long-term fertilization on the microbial biomass carbon and soil microbial communities in paddy red soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(16): 3340-3347. (in Chinese)

[33] 任天志, Grego S. 持续农业中的土壤生物指标研究. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(1): 68-75.

Ren T Z, Grego S. Soil bioindicators in sustainable agriculture. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2000, 33(1): 68-75. (in Chinese)

[34] Ding M M, Yi W M, Liao L Y, Martens R, Insam H. Effects of afforestation on microbial biomass and activity in soils of tropical China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1992, 24: 865-872.

[35] Sparling G P. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Australia Journal of Soil Research, 1992, 30: 195-207.

[36] Wardle D A, Ghani A. A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO₂) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1995, 27: 1601-1610.

[37] Dilly O, Munch J C. Microbial biomass content, basal respiration and enzyme activities during the course of decomposition of leaf litter in a black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn) forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28: 1073-1081.

[38] 李忠佩, 吴晓晨, 陈碧云. 不同利用方式下土壤有机碳转化及微生物群落功能多样性变化. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(8): 1712-1721.

Li Z P, Wu X C, Chen B Y. Changes in transformation of soil organic carbon and functional diversity of soil microbial community under different land use patterns. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(8): 1712-1721. (in Chinese)

[39] 刘明, 李忠佩, 路磊, 车玉萍. 添加不同养分培养下水稻土微生物呼吸和群落功能多样性变化. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(3): 1108-1115.

Liu M, Li Z P, Lu L, Che Y P. Changes in soil respiration and microbial functional diversity of paddy soil under different fertilizer amendments. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(3): 1108-1115. (in Chinese)