综合农学管理模式对春玉米产量和养分累积特征的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.006

中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (20): 3546-3558.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.006

• 专题：东北春玉米高产与养分高效 • 上一篇下一篇

综合农学管理模式对春玉米产量和养分累积特征的影响

袁静超¹,刘剑钊¹,梁尧¹,展文洁^1,²,张洪喜¹,曾子豪^1,²,蔡红光¹(),任军¹()

¹ 吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业部东北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室,长春 130033
² 吉林农业大学,长春 130118

收稿日期:2019-03-19 接受日期:2019-07-01 出版日期:2019-10-16 发布日期:2019-10-28
通讯作者: 蔡红光,任军
作者简介:袁静超,E-mail：jingchao_yuan@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0201804);吉林省科技厅重点研发项目(20180201077NY);吉林省农业科技创新工程(CXGC2017ZD001);吉林省人才开发资金项目

Characteristics of Grain Yield and Nutrient Accumulation for Spring Maize Under Different Agronomic Management Practices

JingChao YUAN¹,JianZhao LIU¹,Yao LIANG¹,WenJie ZHAN^1,²,HongXi ZHANG¹,ZiHao ZENG^1,²,HongGuang CAI¹(),Jun REN¹()

¹ Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Agro-Environment in Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture, Changchun 130033
² Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118

Received:2019-03-19 Accepted:2019-07-01 Online:2019-10-16 Published:2019-10-28
Contact: HongGuang CAI,Jun REN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 研究综合农学管理模式下春玉米产量及开花前后植株养分累积与转运特征,旨在为春玉米高产高效生产提供理论和技术支持。【方法】 试验于2009—2011年在吉林省公主岭市铁北区进行,以先玉335为供试材料,在大田条件下设置5种不同农学管理模式,即无肥区（CK）、农户习惯模式（FP）、综合农学管理模式1（Opt-1）、综合农学管理模式2（Opt-2）、综合农学管理模式3（Opt-3）,通过3年定位试验,系统监测不同生育时期植株氮、磷、钾养分吸收与累积特征,重点对开花前后春玉米干物质及氮磷钾养分累积与转运特征进行比较研究。【结果】 合理增密、平衡施肥和深松作业是春玉米获得高产的关键措施。5种模式间以Opt-3最优,与农户习惯模式（FP）相比,Opt-3产量和干物质累积量增幅分别为13.9%和22.4%,其增产贡献主要来自于收获穗数（较农户模式增加34.3%）。在与FP处理化肥投入量基本一致的情况下,Opt-3处理下植株氮、磷、钾累积量分别增加9.5%、28.1%和23.9%,氮、磷、钾素转运效率分别增加47.7%、21.7%和45.0%,氮肥偏生产力增加14.0%,磷肥偏生产力增加4.4%。与Opt-1模式相比,Opt-3处理主要通过增加密度实现了产量的进一步提升（较Opt-1种植密度增加10 000株/hm ²,增产56—346 kg·hm ^-2）;与Opt-2模式相比,Opt-3主要通过肥料的进一步优化实现了效率的提升（较Opt-2氮肥农学利用率提高29.5%）。通过肥料成本核算,Opt-3处理较FP处理增加收益2 218元/hm ²,较Opt-1处理增加收益290元/hm ²,较Opt-2处理节约成本367元/hm ²。【结论】 合理增密至70 000株/hm ²、优化化肥用量（N 225 kg·hm ^-2-P₂O₅ 90 kg·hm ^-2-K₂O 90 kg·hm ^-2）和施用时期、增施有机肥（15 000 kg·hm ^-2）、补充中微肥（150 kg·hm ^-2）,并结合土壤深松是较为优化的综合农学管理模式,可以实现东北中部春玉米产量和效率的协同提升。

关键词: 农学管理, 春玉米, 产量, 养分累积与转运, 偏生产力

Abstract:

【Objective】 This research aimed to investigate the characteristics of grain yield, nutrient accumulation and transport of spring maize before and after flowering under different agronomic management practices, so as to provide theoretical and technical support for high yield and efficient production of spring maize. 【Method】 The field experiment was conducted from 2009 to 2012 in Gongzhuling of Jilin province. The hybrid “Xianyu335” was used as research material. During three consecutive years, five different agronomic management practices (CK, FP, Opt-1, Opt-2, and Opt-3) were set under the field conditions. The characteristics of dry matter accumulation, nutrient absorbing and transport were monitored before and after flowering of spring maize. The influence of grain yield was studied under different agronomic management practices. 【Result】 Reasonable densification, nutrient management and deep scarification were the key measures for high yield of spring maize. The result indicated Opt-3 was optimal under five different agronomic management practices. Compared with FP, the grain yield and dry matter accumulation of Opt-3 increased 13.9% and 22.4%, respectively. The number of maize ears in harvest stage contributed yield mostly, and the yield under Opt-3 was 34.3% higher than that under FP. Under the condition of same amount of fertilizer input between Opt-3 and FP, N, P and K accumulation of Opt-3 increased by 9.5%, 28.1% and 23.9% than that of FP, respectively. N, P and K translocation rate of Opt-3 increased by 47.7%, 21.7% and 45.0%, respectively. Partial productivity of N, P fertilizer increased by 14.0% and 4.4%, respectively. Compared with Opt-1, the grain yield of Opt-3 was further augmented by increasing planting density. When planting density was increased by 10 000 plant/hm ², the grain yield increased 56-346 kg·hm ^-2. Compared with Opt-2, the efficiency of Opt-3 was improved through further optimization of fertilizer, and ANUE of Opt-3 increased 29.5%. Through fertilizer cost accounting, compared with FP, Opt-3 increased income by 2 218 yuan/hm ². Compared with Opt-1, Opt-3 increased income by 290 yuan/hm ². Compared with Opt-2, Opt-3 saved 367 yuan/hm ².【Conclusion】 By reasonable densification to 70 000 plant/hm ², optimized fertilizer (N 225 kg·hm ^-2-P₂O₅ 90 kg·hm ^-2-K₂O 90 kg·hm ^-2) and application period, organic fertilizer (1 500 kg·hm ^-2), added microelement fertilizer (150 kg·hm ^-2), combined with soil deep tillage, it was a relatively optimized integrated agronomic management mode, which could realize the synergistic improvement of spring maize yield and efficiency in the middle of northeast China.

Key words: agronomic management practices, spring maize, grain yield, nutrient accumulation and transport, partial productivity

袁静超,刘剑钊,梁尧,展文洁,张洪喜,曾子豪,蔡红光,任军. 综合农学管理模式对春玉米产量和养分累积特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(20): 3546-3558.

JingChao YUAN,JianZhao LIU,Yao LIANG,WenJie ZHAN,HongXi ZHANG,ZiHao ZENG,HongGuang CAI,Jun REN. Characteristics of Grain Yield and Nutrient Accumulation for Spring Maize Under Different Agronomic Management Practices[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20): 3546-3558.

0
/ 收藏文章 0 / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.20.006

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2019/V52/I20/3546

图/表 9

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

参考文献 35

[1]	颜鹏 . 支撑夏玉米高产高效群体的根层氮素调控机制与途径[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
	YAN P . The mechanisms of root-zone N management regulates maize canopy development with high yield and high N use efficiency[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015. ( in Chinese)
[2]	卜令铎 . 旱地春玉米高产高效栽培体系构建、评价及区域模拟[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
	BU L D . The cultivation system establishment and assessment contributing to yield and efficiency improvement of dryland maize, and regional simulation[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2013. ( in Chinese)
[3]	李伟波, 张效朴 . 吉林中部玉米高产施肥与提高化肥利用率研究. 玉米科学, 1998,6(2):65-68.
	LI W B, ZHANG X P . Study on high yield fertilization and fertilizer utilization of maize in central Jilin province. Maize Sciences, 1998,6(2):65-68. (in Chinese)
[4]	张梅, 任军, 郭金瑞, 闫孝贡, 刘剑钊, 蔡红光, 边秀芝 . 吉林中部黑土区玉米高产栽培土壤培肥技术研究. 玉米科学, 2011,19(6):101-104.
	ZHANG M, REN J, GUO J R, YAN X G, LIU J Z, CAI H G, BIAN X Z . Study on the technology of soil fertility for high yielding cultivation of maize plant in Jilin province. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2011,19(6):101-104. (in Chinese)
[5]	任军, 边秀芝, 郭金瑞, 闫孝贡, 刘剑钊 . 黑土区高产土壤培肥与玉米高产田建设研究. 玉米科学, 2008,16(4):147-151,157.
	REN J, BIAN X Z, GUO J R, YAN X G, LIU J Z . Building up fertility for high yield soil and construction of high-yield field in the black soil regions. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008,16(4):147-151,157. (in Chinese)
[6]	边秀芝, 郭金瑞, 闫孝贡, 刘剑钊, 任军 . 吉林西部半干旱区玉米高产氮磷钾肥适宜用量研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(2):63-65.
	BIAN X Z, GUO J R, YAN X G, LIU J Z, REN J . Study on optimum rate of NPK fertilizer application for corn at western semiarid area of Jilin. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2010(2):63-65. (in Chinese)
[7]	边秀芝, 郭金瑞, 闫孝贡, 刘剑钊, 任军 . 吉林中部玉米高产施肥模式研究. 吉林农业科学, 2008,33(6):41-43.
	BIAN X Z, GUO J R, YAN X G, LIU J Z, REN J . Fertilization model of high yield of maize in middle Jilin province. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 2008,33(6):41-43. (in Chinese)
[8]	王楷, 王克如, 王永宏, 赵健, 赵如浪, 王喜梅, 李健, 梁明晰, 李少昆 . 密度对玉米产量(>15000 kg·hm ^-2)及其产量构成因子的影响 . 中国农业科学, 2012,45(16):3437-3445. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.16.025
	WANG K, WANG K R, WANG Y H, ZHAO J, ZHAO R L, WANG X M, LI J, LIANG M X, LI S K . Effects of density on maize yield and yield components. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(16):3437-3445. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.16.025
[9]	赵营, 同延安, 赵护兵 . 不同供氮水平对夏玉米养分累积、转运及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(5):622-627. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2006.0504
	ZHAO Y, TONG Y A, ZHAO H B . Effects of different N rates on nutrients accumulation, transformation and yield of summer maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2006,12(5):622-627. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2006.0504
[10]	王帅, 王楠, 张溪, 杨锡财, 权振贵, 冷冰原 . 玉米栽培模式对暗棕壤微生物学特性及养分状况的影响. 水土保持学报, 2016,30(1):165-170, 195.
	WANG S, WANG N, ZHANG X, YANG X C, QUAN Z G, LENG B Y . Effect of different corn cultivation modes on the microbiological characteristics and nutrient conditions of dark-brown soil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,30(1):165-170, 195. (in Chinese)
[11]	于文颖, 纪瑞鹏, 冯锐, 赵先丽, 张玉书 . 不同生育期玉米叶片光合特性及水分利用效率对水分胁迫的响应. 生态学报, 2015,35(9):2092-2909.
	YU W Y, JI R P, FENG R, ZHAO X L, ZHANG Y S . Response of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of maize leaves in different growth stage. Acata Ecologica Sinca, 2015,35(9):2902-2909. (in Chinese)
[12]	靳立斌, 张吉旺, 李波, 崔海岩, 董树亭, 刘鹏, 赵斌 . 高产高效夏玉米的冠层结构及其光合特性. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(12):2430-2439. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.12.004
	JIN L B, ZHANG J W, LI B, CUI H Y, DONG S T, LIU P, ZHAO B . Canopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics of high yield and high nitrogen efficiency summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,46(12):2430-2439. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.12.004
[13]	李秀芳, 李淑文, 和亮, 文宏达 . 水肥配合对夏玉米养分吸收及根系活性的影响. 水土保持学报, 2011,25(1):188-191, 233.
	LI X F, LI S W, HE L, WEN H D . Effects of water and fertilizer cooperation on plant nutrient accumulation and root activity of summer maize. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,25(1):188-191, 233. (in Chinese)
[14]	王海燕, 高聚林, 王志刚, 于晓芳, 孙继颖, 崔超, 高鑫 . 密度对超高产春玉米氮素积累、运转、利用及叶片衰老的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,32(3):194-198.
	WANG H Y, GAO J L, WANG Z G, YU X F, SUN J Y, CUI C, GAO X . Effects of planting density on nitrogen accumulation, operation, use and leaves senescence of super-high yield spring maize. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2011,32(3):194-198. (in Chinese)
[15]	王宜伦, 李潮海, 何萍, 金继运, 韩燕来, 张许, 谭金芳 . 超高产夏玉米养分限制因子及养分吸收积累规律研究. 植物营养学报, 2010,16(3):559-566.
	WANG Y L, LI C H, HE P, JIN J Y, HAN Y L, ZHANG X, TAN J F . Nutrient restrictive factors and accumulation of super-high-yield summer maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010,16(3):559-566. (in Chinese)
[16]	龚海清, 付海美, 徐明岗, 郜红建, 朱平, 高洪军 . 长期施肥下黑土有机肥替代率变化特征. 中国生态农业学报, 2018,26(9):1398-1406.
	GONG H Q, FU H M, XU M G, GAO H J, ZHU P, GAO H J . Substitution rate of organic fertilizer under long-term fertilization in black soils. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018,26(9):1398-1406. (in Chinese)
[17]	蔡红光, 张秀芝, 闫孝贡, 刘剑钊, 盖嘉慧, 张洪喜, 袁静超, 周康, 任军 . 吉林省春玉米土壤中、微量元素“潜缺乏”初探. 玉米科学, 2013,21(3):71-75.
	CAI H G, ZHANG X Z, YAN X G, LIU J Z, GAI J H, ZHANG H X, YUAN J C, ZHOU K, REN J . Preliminary study on hidden deficiency of secondary and trace elements in spring maize in Jilin province. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013,21(3):71-75. (in Chinese)
[18]	刘武仁, 郑金玉, 罗洋, 郑洪兵, 李瑞平, 李伟堂, 李征, 胡庆生, 杨秀梅 . 不同耕作方式对玉米叶片冠层光合特性的影响. 玉米科学, 2012,20(6):103-106, 111.
	LIU W R, ZHENG J Y, LUO Y, ZHENG H B, LI R P, LI W T, LI Z, HU Q S, YANG X M . Effects of different tillage methods on the photosynthetic traits of maize leaf. Maize Science, 2012,20(6):103-106, 111. (in Chinese)
[19]	隽英华, 汪仁, 孙文涛, 邢月华, 隋世江, 鲁东, 毛佰传 . 施氮模式对春玉米养分累积特性的影响. 核农学报, 2011,25(1):143-148.
	JUAN Y H, WANG R, SUN W T, XING Y H, SUI S J, LU D, MAO B C . Effects of models of applying nitrogen fertilizer on nutrition accumulation of spring maize. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2011,25(1):143-148. (in Chinese)
[20]	高伟, 金继运, 何萍, 李书田 . 我国北方不同地区玉米养分吸收及累积动态研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14(4):623-629. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0402
	GAO W, JIN J Y, HE P, LI S T . Dynamics of maize nutrient uptake and accumulation in different regions of northern China. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2008,14(4):623-629. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0402
[21]	鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Analysis of Soil Agronomization. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[22]	杨恒山, 张玉芹, 徐寿军, 李国红, 高聚林, 王志刚 . 超高产春玉米干物质及养分积累与转运特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(2):315-323. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11296
	YANG H S, ZHANG Y Q, XU S J, LI G H, GAO J L, WANG Z G . Characteristics of dry matter and nutrient accumulation and translocation of super-high-yield maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012,18(2):315-323. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11296
[23]	齐文增, 陈晓璐, 刘鹏, 刘惠惠, 李耕, 邵立杰, 王飞飞, 董树亭, 张吉旺, 赵斌 . 超高产夏玉米干物质与氮、磷、钾养分积累与分配特点. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(1):26-36. doi: 10.11674／zwyf.2013.0103
	QI W Z, CHEN X L, LIU P, LIU H H, LI G, SHAO L J, WANG F F, DONG S T, ZHANG J W, ZHAO B . Characteristics of dry matter, accumulation and distribution of N, P and K of super-high-yield summer maize. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013,19(1):26-36. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11674／zwyf.2013.0103
[24]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振玲, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风 . 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):918-924.
	ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, CUI Z L, MA W Q, CHEN X P, JIANG R F . Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008,45(5):918-924. (in Chinese)
[25]	WANG Y L, LIANG Z Y, YANG Z P, GUO J L, GUO C X, WANG Q . Study on matter production and population photosynthetic characteristics of high-yielding spring maize under different modes. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2016,17(12):2779-2783.
[26]	靳立斌, 崔海岩, 李波, 杨今胜, 董树亭, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺 . 综合农学管理对夏玉米氮效率和土壤硝态氮的影响. 作物学报, 2013,39(11):2009-2015. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.02009
	JIN L B, CUI H Y, LI B, YANG J S, DONG S T, ZHAO B, LIU P, ZHANG J W . Effects of integrated agronomic practices on nitrogen efficiency and soil nitrate nitrogen of summer maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013,39(11):2009-2015. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.02009
[27]	JAT S L, PARIHAR C M, SINGH A K, KUMAR B, SINGH B, SAVEIPUNE D . Plant density and fertilization in hybrid quality protein maize (Zea mays): Effects on the soil nutrient status and performance of succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum) and productivity of cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017,87(1):23-28.
[28]	Amanullah. Rate and timing of nitrogen application influence partial factor productivity and agronomic NUE of maize (Zea mays L.) planted at low and high densities on calcareous soil in northwest Pakistan. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2016,39(5):683-690.
[29]	杨晓卡, 米慧玲, 高韩钰, 辛思颖, 马文奇, 魏静 . 不同栽培模式对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作系统产量、氮素累积和平衡的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(6):1935-1941.
	YANG X K, MI H L, GAO H Y, XIN S Y, MA W Q, WEI J . Effects of different cultivation patterns on yield, nitrate accumulation and nitrogen balance in winter wheat and summer maize rotation system. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(6):1935-1941. (in Chinese)
[30]	张平良, 郭天文, 刘晓伟, 李书田, 曾骏, 谭雪莲, 董博 . 密度和施氮量互作对全膜双垄沟播玉米产量、氮素和水分利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(4):579-590.
	ZHANG P L, GUO T W, LIU X W, LI S T, ZENG J, TAN X L, DONG B . Effect of plant density and nitrogen application rate on yield, nitrogen and water use efficiencies of spring maize under whole plastic-film mulching and double-furrow sowing. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019,25(4):579-590. (in Chinese)
[31]	佟桐, 李彩凤, 顾万荣, 王明泉, 张立国, 刘笑鸣, 王彬, 赵猛 . 氮肥和密度对黑龙江春玉米物质积累、抗倒伏及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2019,28(3):377-387.
	TONG T, LI C F, GU W R, WANG M Q, ZHANG L G, LIU X M, WANG B, ZHAO M . Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density on dry matter accumulation, lodging resistance and yield of spring maize in Heilongjiang province. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentails Sinica, 2019,28(3):377-387. (in Chinese)
[32]	罗方, 杨恒山, 张玉芹, 柳宝林 . 春玉米根系特征对种植密度的响应. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,32(6):494-498.
	LUO F, YANG H S, ZHANG Y Q, LIU B L . Response of root system characteristics of spring maize to planting density. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities(Natural Sciences), 2017,32(6):494-498. (in Chinese)
[33]	CAI H G, MA W, ZHANG X Z, PING J Q, YAN X G, LIU J Z, YUAN J C, WANG L C, REN J . Effect of subsoil tillage depth on nutrient accumulation root distribution and grain yield in spring maize. The Crop Journal, 2014,2(5):297-307.
[34]	袁静超, 刘剑钊, 闫孝贡, 张洪喜, 梁尧, 蔡红光, 任军 . 春玉米连作体系高产栽培模式优化研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(1):53-62.
	YUAN J C, LIU J Z, YAN X G, ZHANG H X, LIANG Y, CAI H G, REN J . Optimization of agronomic management mode for high-yield continuous spring maize cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018,24(1):53-62. (in Chinese)
[35]	蔡红光, 袁静超, 闫孝贡, 刘剑钊, 张洪喜, 梁尧, 任军 . 不同培肥措施对土壤物理性状及无机氮的影响. 土壤通报, 2017,48(2):14-22.
	CAI H G, YUAN J C, YAN X G, LIU J Z, ZHANG H X, LIANG Y, REN J . Characteristics of soil physical property and mineral nitrogen in different soil fertility managements. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2017,48(2):14-22. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

585

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	19	0	0	566

From	Others	local

Times	385	200
Rate	66%	34%

Abstract

369

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	369

From	Others	local

Times	344	25
Rate	93%	7%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	产量 Grain yield (kg·hm^-2)	收获穗数 Ear number (hm^-2)	穗粒数 Kernel number	百粒重 100-kernel weight (g)	增产 Increase (%)
2009	CK	5991.6b	53000c	389b	29.8b	—
	FP	8356.6a	45000d	503a	37.2a	—
	Opt-1	9108.0a	63000a	521a	29.9b	9.0
	Opt-2	9142.0a	61000b	504a	30.4b	9.4
	Opt-3	9163.7a	63000a	501a	29.8b	9.7
2010	CK	7526.1c	58000b	398c	33.9c	—
	FP	8945.6b	51000c	479a	37.9b	—
	Opt-1	10019.9a	57000b	455a	40.7a	12.0
	Opt-2	10390.4a	67000a	388c	41.7a	16.2
	Opt-3	10102.5a	64000a	401b	41.0a	12.9
2011	CK	4457.0c	57000b	288c	27.6b	—
	FP	9253.0b	47000c	638a	35.2ab	—
	Opt-1	10639.0a	57000b	558b	32.6a	15.0
	Opt-2	11077.9a	62000a	504b	33.5ab	19.7
	Opt-3	10985.0a	65000a	504b	32.5b	18.7
变异来源 Sources of variance
年份 Year (Y)		15.77^**	15.81^**	28.55^**	104.26^**
处理 Treatment (T)		85.66^**	3.23^**	45.64^**	21.85^**
年份×处理 Y×T		8.09^**	11.90^**	11.78^**	6.87^**

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	积累量 Accumulation of dry matter (kg·hm^-2)		积累率 Accumulation rate (%)		对籽粒贡献率 Accumulation rate (%)		转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
年份 Year	处理 Treatment	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
2009	CK	6312.0c	8235.0a	43.4	56.6	2.8	97.2	3.3
	FP	8384.5b	7832.4a	51.7	48.3	19.4	80.6	19.3
	Opt-1	9976.0a	9696.2a	50.7	49.3	13.6	86.4	13.3
	Opt-2	11514.3a	9293.9a	55.3	44.7	25.4	74.6	23.2
	Opt-3	11239.2a	8579.4a	56.7	43.3	25.9	74.1	22.8
2010	CK	6028.0b	6480.8d	48.2	51.8	14.2	85.8	15.2
	FP	7850.0b	8985.1c	46.6	53.4	6.2	93.8	6.6
	Opt-1	10154.0a	8739.8c	53.7	46.3	21.3	78.7	19.9
	Opt-2	10920.0a	14267.1a	43.4	56.6	1.1	98.9	1.3
	Opt-3	9906.0a	11906.0b	45.4	54.6	6.9	93.1	7.8
2011	CK	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	FP	11468.0ab	10453.3c	52.3	47.7	14.7	85.3	13.6
	Opt-1	9433.3b	15800.7a	37.4	62.6	1.8	98.2	2.6
	Opt-2	12480.0a	12831.3b	49.3	50.7	12.5	87.5	12.8
	Opt-3	13408.5a	13097.0b	49.1	50.9	11.9	88.1	12.2

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	积累量 Accumulation of dry matter (kg·hm^-2)		积累率 Accumulation rate (%)		对籽粒贡献率 Accumulation rate (%)		转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
年份 Year	处理 Treatment	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
2009	CK	46.8c	78.0a	37.5	62.5	19.4	80.6	37.7
	FP	115.9b	61.3a	65.4	34.6	54.3	45.7	57.8
	Opt-1	141.8a	69.2a	67.2	32.8	57.6	42.4	60.4
	Opt-2	159.5a	57.4a	73.5	26.5	67.7	32.3	65.9
	Opt-3	144.6a	63.7a	69.4	30.6	61.8	38.2	63.9
2010	CK	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	FP	149.7b	65.4a	69.6	30.4	52.3	47.7	42.8
	Opt-1	170.7a	48.5b	77.9	22.1	70.9	29.1	57.9
	Opt-2	186.3a	78.2a	70.4	29.6	57.5	42.5	49.9
	Opt-3	166.1a	67.9a	71.0	29.0	59.0	41.0	51.0
2011	CK	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	FP	113.3bc	130.7a	46.4	53.6	7.4	92.6	8.6
	Opt-1	136.5b	117.8b	53.7	46.3	26.5	73.5	28.9
	Opt-2	161.0a	102.2b	61.2	38.8	41.9	58.1	42.0
	Opt-3	179.4a	75.2c	70.5	29.5	55.7	44.3	46.3

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	积累量 Accumulation of dry matter (kg·hm^-2)		积累率 Accumulation rate (%)		对籽粒贡献率 Accumulation rate (%)		转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
年份 Year	处理 Treatment	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
2009	CK	26.6b	40.4c	39.7	60.3	29.2	70.8	60.1
	FP	35.3b	63.3b	35.8	64.2	19.0	81.0	40.6
	Opt-1	38.4b	82.1a	31.9	68.1	19.5	80.5	50.6
	Opt-2	53.5a	66.2b	44.7	55.3	38.5	61.5	74.3
	Opt-3	50.9a	67.1b	43.1	56.9	37.1	62.9	75.1
2010	CK	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	FP	52.8b	18.8ab	73.8	26.2	64.0	36.0	59.6
	Opt-1	65.4a	22.2a	74.7	25.3	68.4	31.6	66.2
	Opt-2	73.5a	27.0a	73.1	26.9	67.1	32.9	69.2
	Opt-3	59.2b	33.9a	63.6	36.4	51.5	48.5	58.9
2011	CK	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	FP	38.8b	44.8b	46.4	53.6	31.3	68.7	51.1
	Opt-1	49.3b	65.2a	43.1	56.9	24.9	75.1	42.0
	Opt-2	61.2a	59.5ab	51.6	48.4	34.2	65.8	45.6
	Opt-3	62.8a	52.6ab	53.9	46.1	38.4	61.6	50.0

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	积累量 Accumulation of dry matter (kg·hm^-2)		积累率 Accumulation rate (%)		对籽粒贡献率 Accumulation rate (%)		转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
年份 Year	处理 Treatment	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	吐丝前BS	吐丝后AS	转运效率 Translocation rate (%)
2009	CK	78.1b	27.5b	74.0	26.0	35.3	64.7	14.7
	FP	117.9b	60.9a	65.9	34.1	22.1	77.9	12.2
	Opt-1	163.8ab	22.0b	88.2	11.8	76.1	23.9	26.9
	Opt-2	188.4a	19.6b	90.6	9.4	81.9	18.1	25.9
	Opt-3	173.8a	13.7c	92.7	7.3	89.0	11.0	29.1
2010	CK	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	FP	112.6b	3.4c	97.0	3.0	85.7	14.3	23.0
	Opt-1	134.9a	5.3c	96.2	3.8	77.9	22.1	9.9
	Opt-2	148.7a	29.9a	83.3	16.7	50.6	49.4	15.5
	Opt-3	145.5a	15.3b	90.5	9.5	67.2	32.8	16.9
2011	CK	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	FP	84.6c	45.2a	65.2	34.8	21.8	78.2	13.3
	Opt-1	114.1b	47.7a	70.5	29.5	40.2	59.8	24.5
	Opt-2	156.2a	26.4b	85.5	14.5	63.8	36.2	25.0
	Opt-3	156.1a	21.9b	87.7	12.3	69.2	30.8	24.4

综合农学管理模式对春玉米产量和养分累积特征的影响

Characteristics of Grain Yield and Nutrient Accumulation for Spring Maize Under Different Agronomic Management Practices

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

处理 Treatment	种植密度 Plant density (×10⁴plants/hm²)	耕作 Tillage	肥料 Fertilizer	肥料施用量 Fertilizer application amount (kg·hm^-2)
处理 Treatment	种植密度 Plant density (×10⁴plants/hm²)	耕作 Tillage	肥料 Fertilizer	施肥量 Fertilizing amount	播前 Before seeding	拔节期 V6	抽雄期 VT
CK	6.0	灭茬旋耕 Stubble rotary tillage	N	0	—	—	—
			P	0	—	—	—
			K	0	—	—	—
			微量肥Microelement	0	—	—	—
			有机肥Organic	0	—	—	—
FP	5.0	灭茬旋耕 Stubble rotary tillage	N	225	225	—	—
			P	82.5	82.5	—	—
			K	67.5	67.5	—	—
			微量肥Microelement	0	—	—	—
			有机肥Organic	0	—	—	—
Opt-1	6.0	灭茬旋耕 Stubble rotary tillage	N	195	78	117	—
			P	75	75	—	—
			K	82.5	82.5	—	—
			微量肥Microelement	60	60	—	—
			有机肥Organic	15000	15000	—	—
Opt-2	7.0	6展叶深松 V6-subsoiling	N	300	120	120	60
			P	120	96	24	—
			K	120	96	24	—
			微量肥Microelement	150	150	—	—
			有机肥Organic	15000	15000	—	—
Opt-3	7.0	6展叶深松 V6-subsoiling	N	225	90	90	45
			P	90	72	18	—
			K	90	72	18	—
			微量肥Microelement	150	150	—	—
			有机肥Organic	15000	15000	—	—

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	氮肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity of N	磷肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity of P	钾肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity of K
2009	CK	—	—	—
	FP	37.1d	101.3b	123.8a
	Opt-1	46.7a	121.4a	110.4b
	Opt-2	30.5c	76.2c	76.2d
	Opt-3	40.7b	101.8b	101.8c
2010	CK	—	—	—
	FP	39.8c	108.4c	132.5a
	Opt-1	51.4a	133.6a	121.4b
	Opt-2	34.6cd	86.6d	86.6d
	Opt-3	44.9b	112.2b	112.3c
2011	CK	—	—	—
	FP	41.1c	112.2c	137.1a
	Opt-1	54.6a	141.9a	129.0ab
	Opt-2	36.9d	92.3d	92.3c
	Opt-3	48.8b	122.1b	122.1b

[1]	张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[2]	严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299.
[3]	徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313.
[4]	王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16.
[5]	赵政鑫,王晓云,田雅洁,王锐,彭青,蔡焕杰. 未来气候条件下秸秆还田和氮肥种类对夏玉米产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[6]	张玮,严玲玲,傅志强,徐莹,郭慧娟,周梦瑶,龙攀. 播期对湖南省双季稻产量和光热资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 31-45.
[7]	熊伟仡,徐开未,刘明鹏,肖华,裴丽珍,彭丹丹,陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748.
[8]	李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[9]	王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810.
[10]	桂润飞,王在满,潘圣刚,张明华,唐湘如,莫钊文. 香稻分蘖期减氮侧深施液体肥对产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545.
[11]	廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,黄山,曾勇军,张洪程. 杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556.
[12]	李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[13]	张家桦,杨恒山,张玉芹,李从锋,张瑞富,邰继承,周阳晨. 不同滴灌模式对东北春播玉米籽粒淀粉积累及淀粉相关酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1332-1345.
[14]	秦羽青,程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺. 中国北方地区小麦覆盖栽培增产效应的荟萃（Meta）分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109.
[15]	谭先明,张佳伟,王仲林,谌俊旭,杨峰,杨文钰. 基于PLS的不同水氮条件下带状套作玉米产量预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138.