|
|
|
|
|
| Application of the combination of 1,3-dichloropropene and dimethyl disulfide by soil injection or chemigation: effects against soilborne pests in cucumber in China |
| MAO Lian-gang, WANG Qiu-xia, YAN Dong-dong, LIU Peng-fei, SHEN Jin, FANG Wen-sheng, HU Xiao-mei, LI Yuan, OUYANG Can-bin, GUO Mei-xia, CAO Ao-cheng |
1、Department of Pesticides, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R.China
2、State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100193, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 The combination of 1,3-dichloropropene+dimethyl disulfide (1,3-D+DMDS), which forms a pre-plant soil fumigant, can provide a substitute for the environmentally unfriendly methyl bromide (MB). Three greenhouse trials were performed to evaluate the root-knot nematode and soilborne fungi control efficacy in the suburbs of Beijing in China in 2010-2014. Randomized blocks with three replicates were designed in each trial. The combination of 1,3-D+DMDS (10+30 g m−2) significantly controlled Meloidogyne incognita, effectively suppressed the infestation of Fusarium oxysporum and Phytophthora spp., and successfully provided high commercial fruit yields (equal to MB but higher than 1,3-D or DMDS). The fumigant soil treatments were significantly better than the untreated controls. These results indicate that 1,3-D+DMDS soil treatments can be applied by soil injection or chemigation as a promising MB alternative against soilborne pests in cucumber in China.
Abstract The combination of 1,3-dichloropropene+dimethyl disulfide (1,3-D+DMDS), which forms a pre-plant soil fumigant, can provide a substitute for the environmentally unfriendly methyl bromide (MB). Three greenhouse trials were performed to evaluate the root-knot nematode and soilborne fungi control efficacy in the suburbs of Beijing in China in 2010-2014. Randomized blocks with three replicates were designed in each trial. The combination of 1,3-D+DMDS (10+30 g m−2) significantly controlled Meloidogyne incognita, effectively suppressed the infestation of Fusarium oxysporum and Phytophthora spp., and successfully provided high commercial fruit yields (equal to MB but higher than 1,3-D or DMDS). The fumigant soil treatments were significantly better than the untreated controls. These results indicate that 1,3-D+DMDS soil treatments can be applied by soil injection or chemigation as a promising MB alternative against soilborne pests in cucumber in China.
|
|
Received: 22 January 2015
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This research was supported by Beijing Team-Innovation, Modern Agricultural and Industrial Technology Innovation System of China (2010B064) and the Program on Substituted Technology for Methyl Bromide in China (Special Finance of Chinese Ministry of Agriculture, 2110402) over the years. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
CAO Ao-cheng, Tel: +86-10-62815940Fax: +86-10-62894863, E-mail: caoac@vip.sina.com
E-mail: caoac@vip.sina.com
|
| About author: MAO Lian-gang, Tel: +86-10-62815616, E-mail: maoliangang@126.com; |
Cite this article:
MAO Lian-gang, WANG Qiu-xia, YAN Dong-dong, LIU Peng-fei, SHEN Jin, FANG Wen-sheng, HU Xiao-mei, LI Yuan, OUYANG Can-bin, GUO Mei-xia, CAO Ao-cheng.
2016.
Application of the combination of 1,3-dichloropropene and dimethyl disulfide by soil injection or chemigation: effects against soilborne pests in cucumber in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(1): 145-152.
|
| Ajwa H, Klose S, Nelson S D, Minuto A, Gullino M L, LambertiF, Lopez-Aranda J M. 2003. Alternatives to methyl bromidein strawberry production in the United States of America andthe Mediterranean region. Phytopathologia Mediterranea,42, 220-244Arnault I, Fleurance C, Vey F, Fretay G D, Auger J. 2013.Use of Alliaceae residues to control soil-borne pathogens.Industrial Crops and Products, 49, 265-272Bell C H. 2000. Fumigation in the 21st century. Crop Protection,19, 563-569De Cal A, Martinez-Treceño A, Lopez-Aranda J M, Melgarejo P.2004. Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide in Spanishstrawberry nurseries. Plant Disease, 88, 210−214.Cao A. 2003. Project background. In: Cao A, Duan X, YuanH, eds., Screening of the Alternatives to Methyl Bromidein Soil Fumigation in China. China Agricultural UniversityPress, Beijing, China. pp. 1-8 (in Chinese)Csinos A S, Johnson W C, Johnson A W, Sumner D R,McPherson R M, Gitaitis R D. 1997. Alternative fumigantsfor methyl bromide in tobacco and pepper transplantproduction. Crop Protection, 16, 585−594.Desaeger J A, Csinos A S. 2006. Root-knot nematodemanagement in double-cropped plasticulture vegetables.Journal of Nematology, 38, 59-67Desaeger J A, Seebold K W, Csinos A S. 2008. Effect ofapplication timing and method on efficacy and phytotoxicityof 1,3-D, chloropicrin and metam-sodium combinationsin squash plasticulture. Pest Management Science, 64,230-238Giannakou I, Anastasiadis I. 2005. Evaluation of chemicalstrategies as alternatives to methyl bromide for the controlof root-knot nematodes in greenhouse cultivated crops.Crop Protection, 24, 499-506Gilreath J P, Santos B M, Busacca J D, Egerjr J E, Gilreath PR, Mirusso J M. 2006. Validating broadcast application ofTelone C-35 complemented with chloropicrin and herbicidesin commercial tomato farms. Crop Protection, 25, 79-82Gilreath J P, Noling J W, Santos B M. 2004. Methyl bromidealternatives for bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) andcucumber (Cucumis sativus) rotations. Crop Protection,23, 347-351Godbehere J S, Storkan D C. 2013. Odor mitigating fumigantcomposition. Google Patents. [2014-08-08]. http://www.google.com/patents/US20130178364.Heller J J, Sunder P H, Charles P, Pornmier J J, Fritsch J. 2009.Dimethyl disulfide, a new alternative to existing fumigantson strawberries in France and Italy. Acta Horticulturae,842, 953-956Hutchinson C M, McGiffen Jr M E, Ohr H D, Sims J J, BeckerJ O. 2010. Efficacy of methyl iodide and synergy withchloropicrin for control of fungi. Pest Management Science,56, 413-418Komada H. 1975. Development of a selective medium forquantitative isolation of Fusarium oxvsporum from naturalsoil. Review of Plant Protection Research, 8, 114-125Liu W. 2000. Plant Pathogenic Nematodes. China AgriculturePress, Beijing, China. p. 373. (in Chinese)López-Aranda J M, Miranda L, Romero F, De Los Santos B,Soria C, Medina J J, Montes F, Vega J M, Páez J I, BascónJ, Talavera M, Pérez R, Zea T. 2006. Alternativas químicasal bromuro de metilo en fresa. Trabajos realizados enEspaña sobre alternativas al bromuro de metilo en fresa:Resumen de resultados (Research undertaken in Spainon alternatives to methyl bromide: summary of results). In:International Workshop on Alternatives to Methyl Bromidefor Strawberries and Flowers. Auggust 22-23, 2006 Ixtapande la Sal, Mexico. (in Spainish)Mao L, Wang Q, Yan D, Ma T, Liu P, Shen J, Li Y, Ouyang C,Guo M, Cao A. 2014. Evaluation of chloropicrin as a soilfumigant against Ralstonia solanacarum in ginger (Zingiberofficicnale Rosc.) production in China. PLOS ONE, 9,e91767. Mao L, Wang Q, Yan D, Xie H, Li Y, Guo M, Cao A. 2012.Evaluation of the combination of 1,3-dichloropropene anddazomet as an efficient alternative to methyl bromide forcucumber production in China. Pest Management Science,68, 602−609.Mao L, Yan D, Wang Q, Li Y, Ouyang C, Liu P, Shen J, GuoM, Cao A. 2014. Evaluation of the combination of dimethyldisulfide and dazomet as an efficient methyl bromidealternative for cucumber production in China. Journal ofAgricultural and Food Chemistry, 62, 4864-4869Margesin R, Schinner F 2005. Manual for Soil Analysis-Monitoring and Assessing Soil Bioremediation. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 47−49.Masago H, Yoshikawa M, Fukada M, Nakanishi N. 1977.Selective inhibition of Pythium spp. on a medium fordirect isolation of Phytophthora spp. from soils and plants.Phytopathology, 67, 425−428. MBTOC (Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee). 2006.Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee,in 2006 Assessment. United Nations EnvironmentProgramme, Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 101-158MBTOC (Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee) 2010.Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee,in 2010 Assessment. United Nations EnvironmentProgramme, Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 72-97McKinney H H 1923. Influence of soil, temperature and moistureon infection of wheat seedling by Helminthosporiumsativum. Journal of Agricultural Research, 26, 195−217.Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1985. Total carbon, organic carbonand organic matter. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keency OR, eds., Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society ofAgronomy Publishers, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 539-576Qiao K, Dong S, Wang H, Xia X, Ji X, Wang K. 2012.Effectiveness of 1,3-dichloropropene as an alternativeto methyl bromide in rotations of tomato (Solanumlycopersicum) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in China.Crop Protection, 38, 30-34Qiao K, Shi X, Wang H, Ji X, Wang K. 2011. Managing rootknotnematodes and weeds with 1,3-dichloropropene as analternative to methyl bromide in cucumber crops in China.Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59, 2362-2367Santos B M, Gilreath J P, Motis T N, Noling J W, Jones J P,Norton J A. 2006. Comparing methyl bromide alternativesfor soilborne disease, nematode and weed management infresh market tomato. Crop Protection, 25, 690−695.Santos B M, Lopez-Aranda J M, Miranda L, Medina J J, Soria C,de los Santos B, Romero F, Perez-Jimenez R M, TalaveraM, Fennimore S A. 2009. Methyl bromide alternativesfor high tunnel strawberry production in southern Spain.HortTechnology, 19, 187-192Schinner F, Öhlinger R, Kandeler E, Margesin R. 1995. Methodsin Soil Biology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin,Heidelberg. pp. 386-389.Song Z, Wang Q, Guo M, Zhao Y, Cao A. 2008. Assessmenton dimethyl disulfide as a soil fumigant. Agrochemicals, 47,454-456 (in Chinese)Steel R G D, Torrie J H. 1960. Principles and Procedures ofStatistics. McGraw-Hill Book, New York. p. 481.Stewart Z P, Oxborough R M, Tungu P K, Kirby M J, RowlandM W, Irish S R. 2013. Indoor application of attractive toxicsugar bait (ATSB) in combination with mosquito nets forcontrol of pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. PLOS ONE,8, e84168.Thomson W T. 1992. Agricultural Chemicals. ThomsonPublications, Fresno, USA. p. 206.Van Wambeke E. 2007. Combinations of reduced rates of1,3-dichloropropene and dazomet as a broad spectrum soilfumigation strategy in view of methyl bromide replacement.Communications in Agricultural and Applied BiologicalSciences, 72, 61-70Van Wambeke E, Ceustermans A, De Landtsheer A,Coosemans J. 2009. Combinations of soil fumigantsfor methyl-bromide replacement. Communications inAgricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 74, 75−84.Van Wambeke E, Ceustermans A, De Landtsheer A, GybelsK, Coosemans J. 2010. Combinations of chemical soilfumigants for broad spectrum soil disinfestation. ActaHorticulturae, 883, 145-154Wang Q X, Yan D D, Mao L G, Ma T T, Liu P F, Wu Z F, Li Y,Guo M X, Cao A C. 2013. Efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropeneplus chloropicrin gelatin capsule formulation for the controlof soilborne pests. Crop Protection, 48, 24-28Wijesinghe C J, Wilson Wijeratnam R S, Samarasekara J K RR, Wijesundera R L C. 2011. Development of a formulationof Trichoderma asperellum to control black rot diseaseon pineapple caused by (Thielaviopsis paradoxa). CropProtection, 30, 300-306Yates S R, Gan J, Papiernik S K, Dungan R, Wang D. 2002.Reducing fumigant emissions after soil application.Phytopathology, 92, 1344-1348Zanón M J, Gutiérrez L A, Myrta A. 2014. Spanish experienceswith dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) on the control of root-knotnematodes, Meloidogne spp., in fruiting vegetables inprotected crops. Acta Horticulturae, 1044, 421-426 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
