|
|
|
A FIASCO-Based Approach for Detection and Diagnosis of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in China |
LIU Tai-guo, WANG Xi, GAO Li, LIU Bo, CHEN Wan-quan , XIANG Wen-sheng |
1、State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,
Beijing 100193, P.R.China
2、College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P.R.China |
|
|
摘要 Stem or black rust of wheat, caused by the fungus Puccinia graminis Pers. f. sp. tritici Eriks. & E. Henn. (Pgt), has historically caused severe losses to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production worldwide. In the Fujian and Guangdong provinces of China, six moderate-to-severe epidemics of wheat stem rust have occurred, which caused destructive losses of wheat between 1949 and 1966, although these were brought under control by integrated management. A rapid and reliable detection of the pathogen will contribute to the accurate forecast and seasonal control of this disease. The objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic molecular marker generated from simple sequence repeats (SSR) for the early rapid identification of P. graminis. The genomic DNA of P. graminis, Puccinia striiformis, Puccinia triticina and seven other species was amplified by a pair of SSR primers generated by the FIASCO (fast isolation by AFLP sequences containing repeats) enrichment protocol. The primer set Pgtw (f)/ Pgtw (r) generated a polymorphic pattern displaying a 330-bp DNA fragment specific for P. graminis whereas no DNA fragment was obtained from other non-target wheat fungal pathogens. The detection limit of the primer was 1 ng DNA in a 25-mL PCR reaction. The SSR markers of P. graminis can also be used to detect the presence of latent hyphae in Pgt-infected wheat leaves as early as 30 h post-inoculation. A rapid approach to distinguish P. graminis from similar pathogenic fungi would be anticipated in further study.
Abstract Stem or black rust of wheat, caused by the fungus Puccinia graminis Pers. f. sp. tritici Eriks. & E. Henn. (Pgt), has historically caused severe losses to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production worldwide. In the Fujian and Guangdong provinces of China, six moderate-to-severe epidemics of wheat stem rust have occurred, which caused destructive losses of wheat between 1949 and 1966, although these were brought under control by integrated management. A rapid and reliable detection of the pathogen will contribute to the accurate forecast and seasonal control of this disease. The objective of this study was to develop a diagnostic molecular marker generated from simple sequence repeats (SSR) for the early rapid identification of P. graminis. The genomic DNA of P. graminis, Puccinia striiformis, Puccinia triticina and seven other species was amplified by a pair of SSR primers generated by the FIASCO (fast isolation by AFLP sequences containing repeats) enrichment protocol. The primer set Pgtw (f)/ Pgtw (r) generated a polymorphic pattern displaying a 330-bp DNA fragment specific for P. graminis whereas no DNA fragment was obtained from other non-target wheat fungal pathogens. The detection limit of the primer was 1 ng DNA in a 25-mL PCR reaction. The SSR markers of P. graminis can also be used to detect the presence of latent hyphae in Pgt-infected wheat leaves as early as 30 h post-inoculation. A rapid approach to distinguish P. graminis from similar pathogenic fungi would be anticipated in further study.
|
Received: 15 August 2013
Accepted:
|
Fund: Financial supports by the National 973 Program of China (2013CB127701 and 2011CB100403), the Ntional 863 Program of China (2012AA101501) and the National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China (2012BAD19BA04) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest, China (200903035) and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-03) from the Ministry of Agriculture of China, and the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (31371884) are also gratefully acknowledged. The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or the preparation of the manuscript. |
Corresponding Authors:
CHEN Wan-quan, E-mail: wqchen@ippcaas.cn; XIANG Wen-sheng, E-mail: xiangwensheng@neau.edu.cn
E-mail: wqchen@ippcaas.cn;xiangwensheng@neau.edu.cn
|
About author: LIU Tai-guo, E-mail: tgliu@ippcaas.cn;* These authors contributed equally to this study. |
Cite this article:
LIU Tai-guo, WANG Xi, GAO Li, LIU Bo, CHEN Wan-quan , XIANG Wen-sheng.
2014.
A FIASCO-Based Approach for Detection and Diagnosis of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(11): 2438-2444.
|
Cao L H, Xu S C, Lin R M, Liu T G, Chen W Q. 2008. Earlymolecular diagnosis and detection of Puccinia striiformisf. sp. tritici in China. Letters in Applied Microbiology,46, 501-506Chen H Q, Sui C, Wei J H. 2009. Summary of strategies fordeveloping SSR primer. Molecular Plant Breeding, 7,845-851Gao L, Chen W, Liu T. 2010. Development of a SCAR markerby inter-simple sequence repeat for diagnosis of dwarf buntof wheat and detection of Tilletia controversa Kühn. FoliaMicrobiologica, 55, 258-264Gao L, Chen W, Liu T. 2011. An ISSR-based approach forthe molecular detection and diagnosis of dwarf bunt ofwheat, caused by Tilletia controversa Kühn. Journal ofPhytopathology, 159, 155-158Jak?e J, Javornik B. 2001. High throughput isolation ofmicrosatellites in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). PlantMolecular Biology Reporter, 19, 217-226Jin Y, Pretorius Z A, Singh R P. 2007. New virulence within race TTKS (Ug99) of the stem rust pathogen and effectiveresistance genes. Phytopathology, 97, S137-S137.Jin Y, Singh R P. 2006. Resistance in US wheat to recenteastern African isolates of Puccinia graminis f. sp. triticiwith virulence to resistance gene Sr31. Plant Disease, 90,476-480Keiper F J, Haque M S, Hayden M J, Park R F. 2006. Geneticdiversity in Australian populations of Puccinia graminisf. sp. avenae. Phytopathology, 96, 96-104Leonard K J, Szabo L J. 2005. Stem rust of small grains andgrasses caused by Puccinia graminis. Molecular PlantPathology, 6, 99-111Liu J H, Gao L, Liu T G, Chen W Q. 2009. Developmentof a sequence-characterized amplified region marker fordiagnosis of dwarf bunt of wheat and detection of Tilletiacontroversa Kühn. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 49,235-240Mackenzie D. 2007. Billions at risk from wheat super-blight.New Scientist, 193, 35.Mottura M, Gailing O, Verga A, Finkeldey R. 2004. Efficiencyof microsatellite enrichment in Prosopis chilensis usingmagnetic capture. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 22,251-258Shen F J, Phill W, Zhang Z H, Zhang A J, Stephanie S, Steve JK, Yue B S 2005. Enrichment of giant panda microsatellitemarkers using dynal magnet beads. Acta Genetica Sinica,32, 457-462 (in Chinese)Szabo L J. 2007. Development of simple sequence repeatmarkers for the plant pathogenic rust fungus, Pucciniagraminis. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 92-94Szabo L J, Kolmer J A. 2007. Development of simple sequencerepeat markers for the plant pathogenic rust fungusPuccinia triticina. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 708-710Tsukasa N, Satomi N, Koji M, Hirotaka Y, Hiroyuki F. 2006.A protocol for the construction of microsatellite enrichedgenomic library. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 24,305-312Visser B, Herselman L, Pretorius Z A. 2009. Geneticcomparison of Ug99 with selected South African races ofPuccinia graminis f.sp. tritici. Molecular Plant Pathology,10, 213-222Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, HornesM, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. 1995.AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. NucleicAcids Research, 23, 4407-4414Wang X J, Zheng W M, Buchenauer H, Zhao J, Han Q M,Huang L L, Kang Z S. 2008. The development of a PCRbasedmethod for detecting Puccinia striiformis latentinfections in wheat leaves. European Journal of PlantPathology, 120, 241-247Zambino P J. 2002. Dry grinding at near-ambient temperaturesfor extracting DNA from rust and other fungal spores.Biotechniques, 33, 48-51Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T. 2002. Strategies formicrosatellite isolation: A review. Molecular Ecology,11, 1-16Zhong S, Leng Y, Friesen T L, Faris J D, Szabo L J. 2009.Development and characterization of expressed sequencetag-derived microsatellite markers for the wheat stem rustfungus Puccinia graminis Brown R L, Cotty P J, Cleveland T E. 1991. Reductionin aflatoxin content of maize by atoxigenic strains ofAspergillus flavus. Journal of Food Protection, 54, 623-626Cotty P J 1994. Influence of field application of an atoxigenicstrain of Aspergillus flavus on the populations of A.flavus infecting cotton bolls and on aflatoxin content ofcottonseed. Phytopathology, 84, 1270-1277Dorner J W, Cole R J, Blankenship P D 1992. Use of abiocompetitive agent to control preharvest aflatoxin indrought stressed peanuts. Journal of Food Protection,55, 888-892Dorner J W, Cole R J, Blankenship P D. 1998. Effect ofinoculum rate of biological control agents on preharvestaflatoxin contamination of peanuts. Biological Control,12, 171-176Dorner J W, Cole R J, Wicklow D T 1999 Aflatoxin reductionin corn through field application of competitive fungi.Journal of Food Protection, 62, 650-656Figueiredo M V, Martinez C R B, Burity H A, Chanway C P2008. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improvingnodulation and nitrogen fixation in the common bean(Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World Journal of Microbiology& Biotechnology, 24, 1187-1193Kerry B R. 2000. Rhizosphere interactions and the exploitationof microbial agents for the biological control of plantparasiticnematodes. Annual Review of Phytopathology,38, 423-441Kloepper J W, Schroth M N 1978. Plant growth promotingrhizobacteria on radishes. In: Proceedings of the VIthInternational Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria.Angres, France, 2, 879-882Kondo T, Sakurada M, Okamoto S, Ono M, Tsukigi H,Suzuki A, Nagasawa H, Sakuda S 2001. Effects ofaflastatin A, an inhibitor of aflatoxin production, onaflatoxin biosynthetic pathway and glucose metabolismin Aspergillus parasiticus. Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo),54, 650-657 Malik K A, Rakhshanda B. 1997. Association of nitrogenfixingplant growth promoting rhizobateria (PGPR) withKallar grass and rice. Plant and Soil, 194, 37-44Mickler C J, Bowen K L, Kloepper J K. 1995. Evaluation ofselected geocarposphere bacteria for biological control ofAspergillusflavus in peanut. Plant and Soil, 175, 291-299Moyne A L, Shelby R, Cleveland T E, Tuzun S. 2001.Bacillomycin D: An iturin with antifungal activity againstAspergillus flavus. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 90,622-629Paster N, Drody S, Chalutz E, Menasherov M, Nitzan R,Wilson C L. 1993. Evaluation of the potential of theyeast Pichia guilliermondii as a biological control agentagainst Aspergillus flavus and fungi of stored soya beans.Mycological Research, 97, 1201-1206Taylor W J, Draughon F A. 2001. Nannocystis exedens: Apotential biocompetitive agent against Aspergillus flavusand Aspergillus parasiticus. Journal of Food Protection,64, 1030-1034Tong J H, Li Y W, Huang Z G, Tian M, Ding J H. 2009.Simultaneous determination of several phytohormonesin cotton root by using high performance liquidchromatography. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 9,2476-2479Van L C. 2007. Plant responses to plant growth-promotingbacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 119,243-254Yabe K, Nakamura H, Ando Y, Terakado N, Nakajima H,Hamasaki T. 1988. Isolation and characterization ofAspergillus parasiticus mutants with impaired aflatoxinproduction by a novel tip culture method. Applied andEnvironmental Microbiology, 54, 2096-2100Yan P S, Gao X J, Wu H Q, Li Q W, Ning L M, Guan S S.2010. Isolation and screening of biological control bacterialstrains against Aspergillus parassiticus from groundnutgeocarposphere. Journal of Earth Science, 21, 309-311Yan P S, Song Y, Sakuno E, Nakajima H, Nakagawa H,Yabe K. 2004. Cyclo (L-leucyl-L-prolyl) produced byAchromobacter xylosoxidans inhibits aflatoxin productionby Aspergillus parasiticus. Appllied & EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 70, 7466-7473f. sp. tritici. Phytopathology,99, 282-289 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|