|
|
|
|
|
| Prospective use of bacteriocinogenic Pediococcus pentosaceus as direct-fed microbial having methane reducing potential |
| Sanjay Kumar, Sumit S Dagar, Seyed H Ebrahimi, Ravinder K Malik, Ramesh C Upadhyay, AnilK Puniya |
1、Dairy Microbiology Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India
2、Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India
3、Dairy Cattle Physiology, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India
4、Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterninary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19348, USA
5、Microbial Science Division, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune 411004, India |
|
|
|
摘要 Direct-fed microbials (DFM), generally regarded as safe status, are successfully used in improving rumen ecology, gastro-intestinal health, feed efficiency, milk production and growth rate in ruminants. On the other hand, methanogenesis in rumen, which accounts for a significant loss of ruminant energy and increased greenhouse gas in environment, is of great concern, therefore, use of DFM for improving productivity without compromising the animal health and ecological sustainability is encouraged. The present study was conducted to investigate the methane reducing potential of bacteriocinogenic strain Pediococcus pentosaceus-34. Since, the culture showed no hemolysis on blood agar and DNase activity, hence, it was considered to be avirulent in nature, a prerequisite for any DFM. The culture also showed tolerance to pH 5.0 for 24 h with 0.5% organic acid mixture, whereas when given a shock for 2 h at different pH and organic acids concentrations, it showed growth at pH 3.0 and 4.0 with 0.1 and 1.0% organic acids, respectively, as having good animal probiotics attributes. The total gas production was significantly (P<0.05) higher in live pedicoccal culture (LPC) and dead pedicoccal culture (DPC) both with wheat straw, when compared to the control. In sugarcane bagasse, gas production was significantly lower (P<0.05) with LPC compared to the control and DPC both. Methane was reduced by the inclusion of LPC in sugarcane bagasse (0.07 mL CH4 mg–1 dry matter digestibility) with no effect on other rumen fermentation parameters. However, with wheat straw and LPC total gas, in vitro dry matter digestibility, total volatile fatty acids increased significantly but no reduction in methane production was observed in comparison to the control. Therefore, further research is warranted in this direction, if the bacteriocinogenic strains can be used as DFM for ruminants to improve the ruminant productivity.
Abstract Direct-fed microbials (DFM), generally regarded as safe status, are successfully used in improving rumen ecology, gastro-intestinal health, feed efficiency, milk production and growth rate in ruminants. On the other hand, methanogenesis in rumen, which accounts for a significant loss of ruminant energy and increased greenhouse gas in environment, is of great concern, therefore, use of DFM for improving productivity without compromising the animal health and ecological sustainability is encouraged. The present study was conducted to investigate the methane reducing potential of bacteriocinogenic strain Pediococcus pentosaceus-34. Since, the culture showed no hemolysis on blood agar and DNase activity, hence, it was considered to be avirulent in nature, a prerequisite for any DFM. The culture also showed tolerance to pH 5.0 for 24 h with 0.5% organic acid mixture, whereas when given a shock for 2 h at different pH and organic acids concentrations, it showed growth at pH 3.0 and 4.0 with 0.1 and 1.0% organic acids, respectively, as having good animal probiotics attributes. The total gas production was significantly (P<0.05) higher in live pedicoccal culture (LPC) and dead pedicoccal culture (DPC) both with wheat straw, when compared to the control. In sugarcane bagasse, gas production was significantly lower (P<0.05) with LPC compared to the control and DPC both. Methane was reduced by the inclusion of LPC in sugarcane bagasse (0.07 mL CH4 mg–1 dry matter digestibility) with no effect on other rumen fermentation parameters. However, with wheat straw and LPC total gas, in vitro dry matter digestibility, total volatile fatty acids increased significantly but no reduction in methane production was observed in comparison to the control. Therefore, further research is warranted in this direction, if the bacteriocinogenic strains can be used as DFM for ruminants to improve the ruminant productivity.
|
|
Received: 21 October 2013
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The work was conducted as a part of a Ph D project of Sanjay Kumar that was supported by NDRI (ICAR) fellowship. The authors are also grateful to National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture, India (NICRA) for providing partial support. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Anil Kumar Puniya, E-mail: akpuniya@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
Sanjay Kumar, Sumit S Dagar, Seyed H Ebrahimi, Ravinder K Malik, Ramesh C Upadhyay, AnilK Puniya.
2015.
Prospective use of bacteriocinogenic Pediococcus pentosaceus as direct-fed microbial having methane reducing potential. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(3): 561-566.
|
| Abdel-Aziz N A, Salem A Z M, El-Adawy M M, Camacho LM, Kholif A E, Elghandour M M Y, Borhami B E. 2015.Biological treatments as a mean to improve feed utilizationin agriculture animals-An overview. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 14, 534-543Agarwal N, Kamra D, Chaudhary L, Sahoo A, Pathak N 2000Selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for use asa microbial feed additive. Letters in Applied Microbiology,31, 270-273Albano H, Pinho C, Leite D, Barbosa J, Silva J, Carneiro L,Magalhães R, Hogg T, Teixeira P. 2009. Evaluation of abacteriocin-producing strain of Pediococcus acidilactici asa biopreservative. Food Control, 20, 764-770Asa R, Tanaka A, Uehara A, Shinzato I, Toride Y, Usui N,Hirakawa K, Takahashi J. 2010. Effects of proteaseresistantantimicrobial substances produced by lactic acidbacteria on rumen methanogenesis. Asian-AustralasianJournal of Animal Science, 23, 700-707Callaway T, Martin S, Wampler J, Hill N, Hill G. 1997. Malatecontent of forage varieties commonly fed to cattle. Journalof Dairy Science, 80, 1651-1655Chaucheyras-Durand F, Duran H. 2010. Probiotics in animalnutrition and health. Beneficial Microbes, 1, 3-9Elghandour M M Y, Vázquez Chagoyán J C, Salem A Z M, KholifA E, Martínez Castañeda J S, Camacho L M, Cerrillo-SotoM A. 2014. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at directaddition or pre-incubation on in vitro gas production kineticsand degradability of four fibrous feeds. Italian Journal ofAnimal Sciecne, 13, 295-301Elghandour M M Y, Salem A Z M, Martínez Castañeda J S,Camacho L M, Kholif A E, Vázquez Chagoyán J C. 2015.Direct-fed microbes: A tool for improving the utilization oflow quality roughages in ruminants. Journal of IntegrativeAgriculture, 14, 526-533Elsner H A, Sobottka I, Mack D, Laufs R, Claussen M, WirthR. 2000. Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis andEnterococcus faecium blood culture isolates. EuropeanJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 19, 39-42Gamo Y, Mii M, Zhou X G, Sar C, Santoso B, Arai I, KimuraK,Takahashi J. 2002. Effects of lactic acid bacteria, yeastsand galactooligosaccharide supplementation on in vitrorumen methane production. In: Takahashi J, Young B A,eds., Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture. ElsevierScience BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 201-204Goering H K, van Soest P J. 1970. Forage fibre analysis:Apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications.In: USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 379. US GovernmentPrinting Office, Washington, D.C. p. 20.Gupta H, Malik R K. 2007. Incidence of virulence in bacteriocinproducingenterococcal isolates. Le Lait: Dairy Science andTechnology, 87, 587-601Hu W L, Liu J X, Ye J A, Wu Y M, Guo Y Q. 2005. Effect oftea saponin on rumen fermentation in vitro. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 120, 333-339Ike Y, Hashimoto H, Clewell D. 1987. High incidence ofhemolysin production by Enterococcus (Streptococcus)faecalis strains associated with human parenteral infections.Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 25, 1524-1528Jin L, Ho Y, Abdullah N, Ali M, Jalaludin S. 1998. Effects ofadherent Lactobacillus cultures on growth, weight of organsand intestinal microflora and volatile fatty acids in broilers.Animal Feed Science and Technology, 70, 197-209Kalmokoff M, Bartlett F, Teather R. 1996. Are ruminal bacteriaarmed with bacteriocins? Journal of Dairy Science, 79,2297-2306Klieve A V, Hegarty R S. 1999. Opportunities for biologicalcontrol of ruminal methanogenesis. Asian-AustralasianJournal of Agricultural Research, 50, 1315-1320Krehbiel C R, Rust S R, Zhang G, Gilliland S E. 2003. Bacterialdirect-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performanceresponse and mode of action. Journal of Animal Science,81, E120-E132.Kumar S, Choudhury P K, Carro M D, Griffith G W, Dagar S S,Puniya M, Calabro S, Ravella S R, Dhewa T, Upadhyay RC, Sirohi S K, Kundu S S, Wanapat M, Puniya A K. 2014.New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation fromruminants. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98,31-44Kumar S, Dagar S S, Puniya A K, Upadhyay R C. 2013a.Changes in methane emission, rumen fermentation inresponse to dietand microbial interactions. Research inVeterinary Science, 94, 263-268Kumar S, Dagar S S, Sirohi, S K, Upadhyay R C, Puniya AK. 2013b. Microbial profiles, in vitro gas production, drymatter digestibiltiy based on various ratio of roughage toconcentrate. Annals of Microbiology, 63, 541-545Kumar S, Dagar S S, Puniya A K. 2012. Isolation andcharacterization of methanogens from rumen of Murrahbuffalo. Annals of Microbiology, 62, 345-350Kumar S, Puniya A K, Puniya M, Dagar S S, Sirohi S K, SinghK, Griffith G W. 2009. Factors affecting rumen methanogensand methane mitigation strategies. World Journal ofMicrobiology and Biotechnology, 25, 1557-1566Lee S S, Hsu J T, Mantovani H C, Russell J B. 2002. The effectof bovicin HC5, a bacteriocin from Streptococcus bovis HC5,on ruminal methane production in vitro. FEMS MicrobiologyLetters, 217, 51-55Lila Z A, Mohammed N, Yasui T, Kurokawa Y, Kanda S,Itabashi H. 2004. Effects of a twin strain of Saccharomycescerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal microorganismfermentation in vitro. Journal of Animal Science, 82,1847-1854Martin S A, Nisbet D J. 1992. Effect of direct-fed microbials onrumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science,75, 1736-1744 Newbold C J, Wallace R J, Chen X B, McIntosh F M. 1995.Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in theireffects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep.Journal of Animal Science, 73, 1811-1818Nollet L, Mbanzamihigo L, Demeyer D, Verstraete W. 1998.Effect of the addition of Peptostreptococcus productusATCC 35244 on reductive acetogenesis in the ruminalecosystem after inhibition of methanogenesis by cell-freesupernatant of Lactobacillus plantarum 80. Animal FeedScience and Technology, 71, 49-66Puniya A K, Salem A Z M, Kumar S, Dagar S S, Griffith G W,Puniya M, Ravella S R, Kumar N, Dhewa T, Kumar R. 2015.Role of live microbial feed supplements with reference toanaerobic fungi in ruminant productivity: A review. Journalof Integrative Agriculture, 14, 550-560Russell J B, Mantovani H C. 2002. The bacteriocins of ruminalbacteria and their potential as an alternative to antibiotics.Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 4, 347-355Sandri M, Manfrin C, Pallavicini A, Stefanon B. 2014. Microbialdiversity of the liquid fraction of rumen content from lactatingcows. Animal, 8, 572-579Tabe E S, Oloya J, Doetkott D K, Bauer M L, Gibbs P S,Khaitsa M L. 2008. Comparative effect of direct-fedmicrobials on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7and Salmonella in naturally infected feedlot cattle. Journalof Food Protection, 71, 539-544Tilley J M A, Terry R A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the invitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science,18, 104-111Weinberg Z, Shatz O, Chen Y, Yosef E, Nikbahat M, Ben-Ghedalia D, Miron J. 2007. Effect of lactic acid bacteriainoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silages.Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 4754-4762Wilkinson L. 1992. SYSTAT for Windows: Statistics, Graphics,Data, Getting Started. Version 5. Systat, USA. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
