|
|
|
|
|
| Characterization of Growth and Light Utilization for Rice Genotypes with Different Tiller Angles |
| OUYANG You-nan, ZENG Fan-rong, ZHAN Ling, ZHANG Guo-ping |
1.Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology
2.State Key Laboratory for Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute
3.College of Life and Environment Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University |
|
|
|
摘要 Tiller angle is very important for plant architecture and canopy structure in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiological and ecological characteristics of three rice genotypes with different tiller angle habits were compared in the paper. DI508, a genotype with changing tiller angle during the growth, has semi-erect tillers at early tillering stage, similar to genotype M09, and had erect tillers at late stage, similar to genotype 9308. In terms of dry biomass per plant, DI508 was consistently higher than those of M09 and 9308 throughout the growth. It was also a distinct difference of leaf area per plant that DI508 was larger than two others. From booting stage, DI508 and 9308 maintained higher photosynthetic ability of the topmost three leaves, while M09 showed rapid decline in photosynthesis during grain filling. It may be concluded that the genotype DI508 with dynamic tiller angle habit has a comprehensive advantage of fast growth and high weed competition at early stage and slow decline in photosynthesis at late stage.
Abstract Tiller angle is very important for plant architecture and canopy structure in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiological and ecological characteristics of three rice genotypes with different tiller angle habits were compared in the paper. DI508, a genotype with changing tiller angle during the growth, has semi-erect tillers at early tillering stage, similar to genotype M09, and had erect tillers at late stage, similar to genotype 9308. In terms of dry biomass per plant, DI508 was consistently higher than those of M09 and 9308 throughout the growth. It was also a distinct difference of leaf area per plant that DI508 was larger than two others. From booting stage, DI508 and 9308 maintained higher photosynthetic ability of the topmost three leaves, while M09 showed rapid decline in photosynthesis during grain filling. It may be concluded that the genotype DI508 with dynamic tiller angle habit has a comprehensive advantage of fast growth and high weed competition at early stage and slow decline in photosynthesis at late stage.
|
|
Received: 01 August 2010
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The authors are deeply indebted to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30700486), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Y3110099), and the China Spark Program (2008GA700004) for their support to this project. |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence ZHANG Guo-ping, Professor, Tel: +86-571-86971115, Fax: +86-571-86971117, E-mail: zhanggp@zju.edu.cn
E-mail: zhanggp@zju.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
OUYANG You-nan, ZENG Fan-rong, ZHAN Ling, ZHANG Guo-ping.
2011.
Characterization of Growth and Light Utilization for Rice Genotypes with Different Tiller Angles. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(11): 1701-1709.
|
| [1]Berkowitz A. 1988. Competition for resources in weed-crop mixtures. In: Altieri M A, Liebman M, eds., Weed Management in Agro-Ecosystems: Ecological Approaches. 1998. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, London. pp. 89-119. [2]Blount A R, Gates R N, Pfahler P L, Quesenberry K H. 2003. Early plant selection effects on crown traits in pensacola bahiagrass with selection cycle. Crop Science, 43, 1996-1998. [3]von Caemmerer S, Farquhar G D. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387. [4]Callaway M B. 1992. A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 7, 169-180. [5]Chang T T, Li C C. 1980. Genetics and breeding. In: Luh B S, ed., Rice Production and Utilization. AVI Publishing Company, Westport. pp. 87-146. [6]Chen Y D, Wan B H, Zhang X. 2004. Studies on the morphological characters of south China double cropping super rice at the active tillering stage. Agricultural Sciences in China, 37, 896904. (in Chinese) [7]Cheng S H, Cao L Y, Yang S H, Zhai H Q. 2004. Forty year’s development of hybrid rice: China’s experience. Rice Science, 11, 225-230. [8]Dennis H G, Alla N S, Green S R. 2004. From controlled environments to field simulations: leaf area dynamics and photosynthesis of kiwifruit vines (Actinidia deliciosa). Functional Plant Biology, 31, 169-179. [9]Dingkuhn M, Jones M P, Johnson D E, Sow A. 1998. Growth and yield potential of Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima upland rice cultivars and their interspecific progenies. Field Crops Research, 57, 57-69. [10]Dingkuhn M, Singh B B, Clerget B, Chantereau J, Sultan B. 2006. Past, present and future criteria to breed crops for water-limited environments in West Africa. Agricultural Water Management, 80, 241-261. [11]Dong Y J, Lin D Z, Kamiunten H, Ogawa T, Cai Q S, Tsuzuki E, Terao H, Matsuo H. 2004. Molecular genetic mapping of QTLs for tiller angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 40, 228-234. [12]Forcella F. 1987. Tolerance of weed competition associated with high leaf area expansion rate in tall fescue. Crop Science, 27, 146-147. [13]Hirose T. 2005. Development of the Monsi-Saeki theory on canopy structure and function. Annals of Botany, 95, 483494. Huang Y X. 2003. Creation and new development of the rice ecological breeding system, and emphases on two sources, supper ascendancy rice breeding. World Science-Technology Research and Development, 25, 1-8. (in Chinese) [14]Huang Y X. 2000. Foundation and new development on the scientific system of rice ecological breeding. Chinese Rice Research Newsletter, 8, 13-14. [15]Johnson D E, Dingkuhn M, Jones M P, Mahamane M C. 1998. The influence of rice plant type on the effect of weed competition on Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima. Weed Research, 38, 207-216. [16]Jones M P, Dingkuhn M, Aluko G K, Semon M. 1997. Interspecific Oryza sativa L.×O. glaberrima Steud. progenies in upland rice improvement. Euphytica, 92, 237-246. [17]Kang W, Ouyang Y, Zhang S, Dong C, Zhu L, Yu S, Xu D, Jin Q. 2007. Morphological and ontogenic characterization of rice with dynamic tiller angle. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 21, 372-378. (in Chinese) [18]Khush G S. 1995. Breaking the yield frontier of rice. GeoJounal, 35, 329-332. [19]Khush G S. 1999. Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century. Genome, 42, 646-655. [20]Lu C, Zou J. 2003. Comparative analysis on plant type of two super hybrid rice and Shanyou 63. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 36, 633-639. (in Chinese) [21]Mao O, Ennos A R. 2006. Structural development and stability of rice Oryza sativa L. var. Nerica 1. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 3123-3130. [22]Nangju D. 1978. Effect of plant density, spatial arrangement, and plant type on weed control in cowpea and soybean. In: Akobundu I O, ed., Weeds and Their Control in the Humid and Subhumid Tropics. 1978. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Nigeria. pp. 288-293. [23]Peng S, Cassman K G, Virmani S S, Sheehy J, Khush G S. 1999. Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Science, 39, 1552-1559. [24]Qian Q, He P, Teng S, Zeng D L, Zhu L H. 2001. QTLs analysis of tiller angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genetica Sinica, 28, 29-32. (in Chinese) [25]Sakamoto T, Morinaka Y, Ohnishi T, Sunohara H, Fujioka S, Ueguchi T M, Mizutani M, Sakata K, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Tanaka H, Kitano H, Matsuoka M. 2006. Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nature Biotechnology, 24, 105-109. [26]Seleznyova A N, Greer D H. 2001. Effects of temperature and leaf osition on leaf area expansion of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) shoots: development of a modeling framework. Annals of Botany, 88, 605-615. [27]Thomas R S, Sheehy J E. 1999. Erect leaves and photosynthesis in rice. Science, 283, 1455. [28]Virk P S, Khush G S, Peng S. 2004. Breeding to enhance yield potential of rice at IRRI: the ideotype approach. International Rice Research Notes, 29, 5-9. [29]Wang G Y, McGiffen M E, Jeff D E, Marchi E C S. 2006. Competitive ability of cowpea genotypes with different growth habit. Weed Science, 54, 775-782. [30]Watanabe T, Hanan J S, Room P M, Hasegawa T, Nakagawa H, Takahashi W. 2005. Rice morphogenesis and plant architecture: measurement, specification and the reconstruction of structural development by 3D architectural modelling. Annals of Botany, 95, 1131-1143. [31]Xu Y B, Mccouch S R, Shen Z. 1998. Transgressive segregation of tiller angle in rice caused by complementary gene action. Crop Science, 38, 12-19. [32]Yu B S, Lin Z W, Li H X, Li X J, Li J Y, Wang Y H, Zhang X, Zhu Z F, Zhai W X, Wang X K, et al. 2007. TAC1, a major quantitative trait locus controlling tiller angle in rice. The Plant Journal, 52, 891-898. [33]Yu Y H, Xu Z J. 2006. Analysis on dynamic change of tiller angle under different cultivation conditions in rice. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 22, 179-181. (in Chinese) [34]Zhao D L, Atlin G N, Bastiaans L, Spiertz J H J. 2006. Comparing rice germplasm groups for growth, grain yield and weedsuppressive ability under aerobic soil conditions. Weed Research, 46, 444-452. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
