Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2021, Vol. 20 Issue (5): 1250-1265    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63442-6
Special Issue: 油料作物合辑Oil Crops
Crop Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effects of shading stress during the reproductive stages on photosynthetic physiology and yield characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea Linn.)
WANG Yi-bo, HUANG Rui-dong, ZHOU Yu-fei
Agricultural College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

在间作系统中,高位作物往往会对低位作物造成遮荫胁迫,从而影响低位作物的农艺特性。本研究探讨了遮荫胁迫下不同花生品种间光合、生理及产量变化的差异机制。在花生的生殖生长时期对4个花生品种S60、C4、P12和YS151进行77天的遮荫胁迫。结果表明,遮荫胁迫下,S60和P12的产量和干物重降低幅度均低于C4和YS151。遮荫胁迫下S60和P12的抗氧化酶活性高于C4和YS151。遮荫胁迫下,S60和P12的捕光能力高于C4和YS151,这与叶绿素a、b含量和叶绿素a/b比值的变化有关。遮荫胁迫下,C4和YS151的净光合速率、气孔导度和蒸腾速率降低,而胞间CO2浓度升高。非气孔限制因子降低了遮荫胁迫下花生的光合能力。遮光胁迫下,S60和P12的PSII (Fv/Fm)和非光化学猝灭(NPQ)的最大光化学效率均高于C4和YS151。以上结果表明,S60和P12在弱光环境中可以吸收更多的光能进行光合作用,并将多余的能量以热量的形式耗散,以提高其防光能力。本研究解释了造成遮荫胁迫下花生品种间抗逆性差异的机制,为耐荫品种的选择提供了生理参数。

In intercropping systems, high-positioned crops often exert shading stress on low-positioned crops, thus affecting the agronomic characteristics of the low-positioned crops.  This study determined the mechanisms of photosynthetic, physiological and yield variations among peanut cultivars under shading stress.  Four peanut cultivars, S60, C4, P12, and YS151, were grown in the field and subjected to shading stress for 77 days during reproductive stages.  S60 and P12 showed lower yield and reduced biomass accumulation than C4 and YS151 under shading stress.  Shading stress induced higher antioxidant enzyme activities in S60 and P12, relative to C4 and YS151.  Under shading stress, S60 and P12 showed a higher light-trapping capability than C4 and YS151, which was associated with changes in chlorophyll (Chl) a and b contents, and Chl a/b ratio.  The net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rates of C4 and YS151 were decreased, but the intercellular CO2 concentration increased under shading stress.  The results demonstrated that non-stomatal limiting factors decreased the photosynthetic capacity of peanut under shading stress.  The maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were higher in S60 and P12 than in C4 and YS151 under shading stress.  These results suggest that S60 and P12 could absorb more light energy from weak light environments for photosynthesis than C4 and YS151 and dissipate the excess energy in the form of heat to improve their light protection ability.  This study explains the inter-variety differences in shading stress tolerance in peanut and provides physiological parameters for guiding the selection of shade-tolerant cultivars.
Keywords:  peanut        shading        antioxidant enzyme system        photosynthesis        fluorescence        yield  
Received: 15 May 2020   Accepted:
Fund: This study was financially supported by the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-06-135-A17)
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence ZHOU Yu-fei, E-mail:    
About author:  WANG Yi-bo, E-mail:;

Cite this article: 

WANG Yi-bo, HUANG Rui-dong, ZHOU Yu-fei. 2021. Effects of shading stress during the reproductive stages on photosynthetic physiology and yield characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea Linn.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(5): 1250-1265.

Agegnehu G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W. 2008. Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 257–263.
Carruthers K, Prithiviraj B, Fe Q, Cloutier D, Martin R C, Smith D L. 2000. Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: Yield component responses. European Journal of Agronomy, 12, 103–115.
Chance B, Maehly A. 1955. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymol, 2, 764–775.
Chen H, Li Q P, Zeng Y L, Deng F, Ren W J. 2019. Effect of different shading materials on grain yield and quality of rice. Scientific Reports, 9, 1–9.
Chen Z, Cui H M, Wu P, Zhao Y L, Sun Y C. 2010. Study on the optimal intercropping width to control wind erosion in North China. Soil & Tillage Research, 110, 230–235.
Dahmardeh M, Ghanbari A S B, Ramroudi M. 2009. Effect of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) with cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on green forage yield and quality evaluation. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 235–239.
Demmig B, Winter K, Krüger A, Czygan F C. 1987. Photoinhibition and zeaxanthin formation in intact leaves: A possible role of the xanthophyll cycle in the dissipation of excess light energy. Journal of Plant Physiology, 84, 218–224.
Djanaguiraman M, Sheeba J A, Devi D D, Bangarusamy U. 2009. Cotton leaf senescence can be delayed by nitrophenolate spray through enhanced antioxidant defence system. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195, 213–224.
Du Y, Zhao Q, Li S, Yao X, Xie F, Zhao M. 2019. Shoot/root interactions affect soybean photosynthetic traits and yield formation: A case study of grafting with record-yield cultivars. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 445.
Du Z K, Wang J. 2012. Cd bio-accumulative characteristics and physiological response of Solanum nigrum L. under different light intensities. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 18, 1502–1510. (in Chinese)
Fan Y Y, Chen J X, Cheng Y J, Ali R M, Wu X L. 2018. Effect of shading and light recovery on the growth, leaf structure, and photosynthetic performance of soybean in a maize-soybean relay-strip intercropping system. PLoS ONE, 13, e0198159.
Field K J, George R, Fearn B, Quick W P, Davey M P. 2013. Best of both worlds: simultaneous high-light and shade-tolerance adaptations within individual leaves of the living stone Lithops aucampiae. PLoS ONE, 8, e75671.
Foyer C H, Noctor G. 2005. Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: A re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant Cell and Environment, 28, 1056–1071.
Garnczarska M , Bednarski W , Morkunas I. 2004. Re-aeration-induced oxidative stress and antioxidative defenses in hypoxically pretreated lupine roots. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161, 415–422.
Gao J, Liu Z, Zhao B, Liu P, Zhang J W. 2020. Physiological and comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into the effects of shade stress in maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Plant Biology, 20, 1.
Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 990, 87–92.
Ghosh P K. 2004. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research, 88, 227–237.
Gill S S, Tuteja N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 909–930.
Gong W Z, Jiang C D, Wu Y S, Chen H H, Liu W Y, Yang W Y. 2015. Tolerance vs. avoidance: two strategies of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings in response to shade in intercropping. Photosynthetica, 53, 259–268.
Gong W Z, Qi P F, Du J B, Sun X, Wu X L, Song C, Liu W G, Wu Y S, Yu X B, Yong T W, Wang X C, Yang F, Yan Y H, Yang W Y. 2014. Transcriptome analysis of shade-induced inhibition on leaf size in relay intercropped soybean. PLoS ONE, 9, e98465.
Gopal K, Muniyappa V, Jagadeeswar R. 2010. Management of peanut budnecrosis disease in groundnut through intercropping with cereal and pulse crops. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 43, 883–891.
Gronle A, Lux G, Böhm H, Schmidtke K, Wild M, Demmel M, Brandhuber R, Wilbois K P, Heß J. 2015. Effect of ploughing depth and mechanical soil loading on soil physical properties weed infestation, yield performance and grain quality in sole and intercrops of pea and oat in organic farming. Soil & Tillage Research, 148, 59–73.
Havir E A, McHale N A. 1987. Biochemical and developmental characterization of multiple forms of catalase in tobacco leaves. Plant Physiology, 84, 450–455.
Jiang C D, Wang X, Gao H Y, Shi L, Chow W S. 2011. Systemic regulation of leaf anatomical structure, photosynthetic performance, and highlight tolerance in sorghum. Plant Physiology, 155, 1416–1424.
Kalaji H M, Carpentier R, Allakhverdiev S I, Bosa K. 2012. Fluorescence parameters as early indicators of light stress in barley. Journal of Photochemistry Photobiology (B: Bilolgy), 112, 1–6.
Kwon J W, Park J H, Kwon K S, Kim D S, Jeong J B, Lee H K. 2006. Effect of shading practices on the chemical compounds and antioxidant in aruncus dioicus. Korean Journal of Plant Resources, 19, 3–19.
Lazár D. 2015. Parameters of photosynthetic energy partitioning. Journal of Plant Physiology, 175, 131–147.
Lei Y, Yin C, Li C. 2006. Differences in some morphological physiological, and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskii. Physiologia Plantarum, 127, 182–191.
Li X Q, Wang J G, Gen C X, Jin S H. 2013. Gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant enzymes in leaves of centipede grass (Eremochloa ophiuroides) after barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) infection. Journal of Pure Applied Microbiology, 7, 393–399.
Li Y H, Shi D Y, Li G H, Zhao B, Zhang J W, Liu P, Ren B Z, Dong S T. 2019. Maize/peanut intercropping increases photosynthetic characteristics, 13C-photosynthate distribution, and grain yield of summer maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18, 2219–2229.
Liang K M, Yang T, Zhang S B, Zhang J E, Luo M Z, Fu L, Zhao B L. 2016. Effects of intercropping rice and water spinach on net yields and pest control: An experiment in southern China. International of Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 14, 448–465.
Liang Y F, Ning J, Yi K C. 2019. Response of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of polygonatum cyrtonema to shading conditions. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 44, 67–75. (in Chinese)
Liu X, Rahman T, Song C, Su B, Yang F, Yong T. 2017. Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 200, 38–46.
Liu X, Rahman T, Song C, Yang F, Su B, Cui L, Bu W, Yang W. 2018. Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize-soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 224, 91–101.
Ma L K, Dong K, Zhu J H. 2019. Effects of N application on faba bean chocolate spot and canopy microclimate in wheat and faba bean intercropping system. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 244–253. (in Chinese)
Matthews R B, Azam Ali S N, Saffell R A, Peacock J M, Williams J H. 1991. Plant growth and development in relation to the microclimate of a sorghum/groundnut intercrop. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 53, 285–301.
Mauro R P, Occhipinti A, Longo A M G, Mauromicale G. 2011. Effects of shading on chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis of subterranean clover. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 197, 57–66.
Meng X H, Zhang Y J, PI L, Yang D F, Zhai Y J. 2007. Effect of shading on the photosynthetic pigment and protective enzyme activities in pinellia ternata leaves. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 27, 1167–1171. (in Chinese)
Peng Q, Liang Y, Chen C, Jia W, Wu X. 2010. Response of physiological characteristics of pepper leaf to different light intensities and soil moisture contents. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 26, 115–121. (in Chinese)
Porra R J. 2002. The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynthesis Research, 73, 149–156.
Ruban A. 2012. The photosynthetic membrane (molecular mechanisms and biophysics of light harvesting) II adaptations of the photosynthetic membrane to light. Photosynthesis Resarch, 122, 233–234.
Schreiber U, Bilger W. 1993. Progress in chlorophyll fluorescence research: Major developments during the past years in retrospect. Progress in Botany, 54, 151–173.
Su B, Song Y, Song C, Cui L, Yong T, Yang W. 2014. Growth and photosynthetic responses of soybean seedlings to maize shading in relay intercropping system in Southwest China. Photosynthetica, 52, 332–340.
Terashima I, Hanba Y T, Tazoe Y, Vyas P, Yano S. 2006. Irradiance and phenotype: Comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 343–354.
Van K O, Snel J F H. 1990. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynthesis Research, 25, 147–150.
Wan Y, Yan Y, Xiang D, Ye M, Yang W, Liu J. 2015. Isoflavonoid accumulation pattern as affected by shading from maize in soybean (Glycine max (L.) merr.) in relay strip intercropping system. Plant Production Science, 18, 302–313.
Wang J, Shi K, Lu W P, Lu D L. 2020. Post-silking shading stress affects leaf nitrogen metabolism of spring maize in southern China. Plants-Basel, 9, 2.
Wang X C, Wu X L, Ding G H, Yang F, Yong T W, Wang X C, Yang W Y. 2020. Analysis of grain yield differences among soybean cultivars under maize-soybean intercropping. Agronomy-Basel, 10, 110.
Wang Y, Zhang Z K, Liang Y Y, Han Y L, Han Y L, Tan J F. 2020. High potassium application rate increased grain yield of shading-stressed winter wheat by improving photosynthesis and photosynthate translocation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 134.
Wu L M, Zhang W J, Ding Y F, Zhang J W, Cambula E D, Weng F, Liu Z H, Ding C Q, Tang S, Chen L, Wang S H, Li G H. 2017. Shading contributes to the reduction of stem mechanical strength by decreasing cell wall synthesis in japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 881.
Wu Y, Li P, Zhao Y, Wang J, Wu X. 2007. Study on photosynthetic characteristics of Orychophragmus violaceus related to shade tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae, 113, 173–176.
Xia L. 1999. Varietal difference in photosynthetic characteristics of rice under photo-oxidation and shading. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 25, 301–308. (in Chinese)
Xu B C, Li F M, Shan L. 2008. Switchgrass and milkvetch intercropping under 2:1 row-replacement in semiarid region, northwest China: Aboveground biomass and water use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 485–492.
Xu H Y, Ying Z, Zhang J Q. 2016. Effect of the intercropping of organic sorghum and different crops on yield and benefit. Tillage and Cultivation, 3, 27–29. (in Chinese)
Xu L, Han L, Huang B. 2011. Antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought and post-drought recovery. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 136, 247–255.
Yang F, Feng L Y, Liu Q L, Wu X L, Fan Y F, Raza M A, Cheng Y Z, Chen J X, Wang X C, Yong T W, Liu W G, Liu J, Du J B, Shu K, Yang W Y. 2018. Effect of interactions between light intensity and red-to-far-red ratio on the photosynthesis of soybean leaves under shade condition. Environmental & Experimental Botany, 150, 79–87.
Yang F, Huang S, Gao R C, Liu W G, Yong T W, Wang X C, Wu X L, Yang W Y. 2014. Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red:far-red ratio. Field Crops Research, 155, 245–253.
Yang F, Liao D, Wu X, Gao R, Fan Y, Raza M A, Wang X, Yong T, Liu W, Liu J. 2017. Effect of aboveground and belowground interactions on the intercrop yields in maize-soybean relay intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 203, 16–23.
Yao X D, Li C H, Li S Y, Zhu Q, Zhang H J, Wang H Y, Yu C M, Steven K S M, Xie F T. 2017a. Effect of shade on leaf photosynthetic capacity, light-intercepting, electron transfer and energy distribution of soybeans. Plant Growth Regulation, 83, 409–416.
Yao X D, Zhou H L, Zhu Q, Li C H, Zhang H J, Wu J J, Xie F T. 2017b. Photosynthetic response of soybean leaf to wide light-fluctuation in maize-soybean intercropping system. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1695.
Yu X B, Luo L, Zeng X T, Su B Y, Gong W Z, Yong T W, Yang W Y, Zhang M R, Wu H Y. 2015. Response of roots morphology and physiology to shading in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 37, 185–193. (in Chinese)
Yucel C, Avci M, Kizilsimsek M, Hatipoglu R. 2020. Yield and quality of silage from soybean-maize intercropping. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 29, 874–883.
Zhang J Z, Shi L, Shi A P, Zhang Q X. 2004. Photosynthetic responses of four Hosta cultivars to shade treatments. Photosynthetica, 42, 213–218.
Zhang Q , Zhai J, Wei Y, Lu L, Peng C. 2019. Effects of shading on the senescence and photosynthetic physiology of the early-flowering rice mutant FTL10 at noon. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 39, 776–784.
Zhang Y Q, Fang H, Fan G Q, Sai L H, Xue L H, Chen X W, Lei J J. 2018. Effects of shading and planting density on the physiological characteristics of flag leaf and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation in South Xinjiang. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 38, 94–100. (in Chinese)
Zivcak M, Brestic M, Kalaji H M, Govindjee. 2014. Photosynthetic responses of sun- and shade-grown barley leaves to high light: is the lower PSII connectivity in shade leaves associated with protection against excess of light? Photosynthesis Research, 119, 339–354.
Zuo Y M, Zhang F S. 2003. The effects of peanut intercropping with different gramineous species and their intercropping model on iron nutrition of peanut. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2, 289–296.
[1] ZHANG Sheng-zhong, HU Xiao-hui, WANG Fei-fei, CHU Ye, YANG Wei-qiang, XU Sheng, WANG Song, WU Lan-rong, YU Hao-liang, MIAO Hua-rong, FU Chun, CHEN Jing. A stable and major QTL region on chromosome 2 conditions pod shape in cultivated peanut (Arachis hyopgaea L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2323-2334.
[2] XU Yan-xia, ZHANG Jing, WAN Zi-yun, HUANG Shan-xia, DI Hao-chen, HE Ying, JIN Song-heng. Physiological and transcriptome analyses provide new insights into the mechanism mediating the enhanced tolerance of melatonin-treated rhododendron plants to heat stress[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2397-2411.
[3] HUA Jin-feng, ZHANG Lei, HAN Yong-hua, GOU Xiao-wan, CHEN Tian-yuan, HUANG Yong-mei, LI Yan-qing, MA Dai-fu, LI Zong-yun. Chromosome-level genome assembly of Cylas formicarius provides insights into its adaptation and invasion mechanisms[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 825-843.
[4] LIU Zhu, NAN Zhen-wu, LIN Song-ming, YU Hai-qiu, XIE Li-yong, MENG Wei-wei, ZHANG Zheng, WAN Shu-bo. Millet/peanut intercropping at a moderate N rate increases crop productivity and N use efficiency, as well as economic benefits, under rain-fed conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 738-751.
[5] TIAN Jin-yu, LI Shao-ping, CHENG Shuang, LIU Qiu-yuan, ZHOU Lei, TAO Yu, XING Zhi-peng, HU Ya-jie, GUO Bao-wei, WEI Hai-yan, ZHANG Hong-cheng. Increasing the appropriate seedling density for higher yield in dry direct-seeded rice sown by a multifunctional seeder after wheat-straw return[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 400-416.
[6] WANG Ke, HE Yan-yan, ZHANG You-jun, GUO Zhao-jiang, XIE Wen, WU Qing-jun, WANG Shao-li. Characterization of the chemosensory protein EforCSP3 and its potential involvement in host location by Encarsia formosa[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 514-525.
[7] YANG Wen-jia, LI Yu-lin, LIU Wei-jian, WANG Shi-wen, YIN Li-na, DENG Xi-ping. Agronomic management practices in dryland wheat result in variations in precipitation use efficiency due to their differential impacts on the steps in the precipitation use process[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 92-107.
[8] JIANG Hui, GAO Ming-wei, CHEN Ying, ZHANG Chao, WANG Jia-bao, CHAI Qi-chao, WANG Yong-cui, ZHENG Jin-xiu, WANG Xiu-li, ZHAO Jun-sheng. Effect of the L-D1 alleles on leaf morphology, canopy structure and photosynthetic productivity in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 108-119.
[9] LI Teng, ZHANG Xue-peng, LIU Qing, LIU Jin, CHEN Yuan-quan, SUI Peng. Yield penalty of maize (Zea mays L.) under heat stress in different growth stages: A review[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2465-2476.
[10] ZHU Peng-fei, YANG Qing-li, ZHAO Hai-yan. Identification of peanut oil origins based on Raman spectroscopy combined with multivariate data analysis methods[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2777-2785.
[11] TIAN Chang, SUN Ming-xue, ZHOU Xuan, LI Juan, XIE Gui-xian, YANG Xiang-dong, PENG Jian-wei. Increase in yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double rice with long-term application of controlled-release urea[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 2106-2118.
[12] WU Han-yu, QIAO Mei-yu, ZHANG Wang-feng, WANG Ke-ru, LI Shao-kun, JIANG Chuang-dao. Systemic regulation of photosynthetic function in maize plants at graining stage under vertically heterogeneous light environment[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 666-676.
[13] ZHAO Zhi-hao, SHI Ai-min, GUO Rui, LIU Hong-zhi, HU Hui, WANG Qiang. Protective effect of high-oleic acid peanut oil and extra-virgin olive oil in rats with diet-induced metabolic syndrome by regulating branched-chain amino acids metabolism[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 878-891.
[14] Muhammad Irfan WARIS, Aneela YOUNAS, Rana Muhammad Kaleem ULLAH, Fatima RASOOL, Muhammad Muzammal ADEEL, WANG Man-qun. Molecular and in vitro biochemical assessment of chemosensory protein 10 from the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens at acidic pH[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 781-796.
[15] XIE Jun, Blagodatskaya EVGENIA, ZHANG Yu, WAN Yu, HU Qi-juan, ZHANG Cheng-ming, WANG Jie, ZHANG Yue-qiang, SHI Xiao-jun. Substituting nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer with optimal amount of crop straw improved rice grain yield, nutrient use efficiency and soil carbon sequestration[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3345-3355.
No Suggested Reading articles found!