中国甘蔗主产区产量差及影响因素分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.11.011

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Although China is the third biggest country in sugarcane planting areas and total production in the world, the sugarcane yield per hectare in China is much lower than the other high-yield sugarcane producing countries. This paper studied sugarcane yield potentials and current yield gaps in different sugarcane producing areas in China, and then the potential to reduce yield gap by optimizing yield-limiting factors was discussed, and thus to provide reference for increasing yield and efficiency in sugarcane production. 【Method】This study was based on data collection including statistical data and experiment data from literatures. A total of 147 data sets of sugarcane yield and planting areas from 1999 to 2018 in different provinces (autonomous regions, cities) were obtained from the national statistics database. Based on the database of CNKI and Web of Science, experiment data about planting density, fertilization rate, variety and yield from 93 papers were collected for main sugarcane producing areas, including 54 papers in Guangxi, 14 papers in Yunnan, and 25 papers in Guangdong. In each producing area, the mean of upper 5% experimental yields was used as yield potential, and the mean of statistical data as farmer’s yield, and yield gap was calculated as the difference between yield potential and farmer’s yield. Then the relationships between yield and fertilization rate, planting density and variety were analyzed, and therefore recommendations of optimized fertilization rate, planting density, variety and the potential to reduce yield gap were obtained. 【Result】Guangxi, Yunnan and Guangdong were the three main sugarcane producing areas in China. The sugarcane yield potentials were 137.1 t·hm^-2in Guangxi, 147.2 t·hm^-2in Yunnan, and 145.8 t·hm^-2in Guangdong, respectively; while farmer’s yield were 74.2, 62.0, 78.3 t·hm^-2, respectively, only achieving 54.1%, 42.1%, and 53.7% yield potential for each area, respectively. Fertilization rate, planting density and variety had significant effects on sugarcane yield, and there was big potential to optimize these yield-limiting factors. The fertilization recommendations were 270 kg N·hm^-2, 99 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2, 208 kg K₂O·hm^-2 in Guangxi, 228 kg N·hm^-2, 117 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2, 281 kg K₂O·hm^-2 in Yunnan, and 240 kg N·hm^-2, 71 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2, 193 kg K₂O·hm^-2 in Guangdong. The recommended planting density in Guangxi, Yunnan, Guangdong was 8×10⁴-10×10⁴, 10×10⁴-12×10⁴, 8×10⁴-10×10⁴ buds/hm², respectively, and the varieties with high yields were GF series, GT series and YT series, respectively. 【Conclusion】According to the results, the potentials of yield increase in Guangxi, Yunnan, Guangdong were 62.9, 85.2, and 67.5 t·hm^-2, respectively. Fertilization optimization could increase yield 16.9, 28.4, and 25.3 t·hm^-2 for each area. Optimizing planting density could increase yield 23.6, 27.9, 22.1 t·hm^-2, and optimizing sugarcane variety could increase yield 26.8, 42.4, and 15.1 t·hm^-2, respectively.

Key words: sugarcane, main sugarcane production areas, yield gaps, fertilization, planting density, variety, potential yield

ZHOU YiFan,YANG LinSheng,MENG Bo,ZHAN Jian,DENG Yan. Analysis of Yield Gaps and Limiting Factors in China’s Main Sugarcane Production Areas[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2377-2388.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

References 41

[1]	王学清, 张静. 中国甘蔗产业支持政策及相关发展思路. 农业展望, 2018,14(1):43-48, 53.
	WANG X Q, ZHANG J. Support policy and relevant development ideas of China’s sugarcane industry. Agricultural Outlook, 2018,14(1):43-48, 53. (in Chinese)
[2]	徐雪, 夏海龙. 中国食糖未来10年产需形势展望. 世界农业, 2014(7):95-99.
	XU X, XIA H L. China’s sugar production and demand outlook in the next 10 years. World Agriculture, 2014(7):95-99. (in Chinese)
[3]	王继华, 商贺阳, 杨少海. 我国甘蔗养分高效利用的研究进展. 中国糖料, 2018,40(6):66-68, 72.
	WANG J H, SHANG H Y, YANG S H. Research progress on nutrient efficient utilization of sugarcane in China. Sugar Crops of China, 2018,40(6):66-68, 72. (in Chinese)
[4]	SHEN J B, ZHU Q C, JIAO X Q. Agriculture green development: a model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020,7(1):5-13. doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2019300
[5]	EVANS L T. Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Photosynthetica, 1998,34(1):56-56. doi: 10.1023/A:1006889901899
[6]	DE DATTA S K. Principles and Practices of Rice Production. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
[7]	杨晓光, 刘志娟. 作物产量差研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(14):2731-2741.
	YANG X G, LIU Z J. Advances in research on crop yield gaps. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014,47(14):2731-2741. (in Chinese)
[8]	魏志标, 柏兆海, 马林, 张福锁. 中国苜蓿、黑麦草和燕麦草产量差及影响因素. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(3):507-522.
	WEI Z B, BO Z H, MA L, ZHANG F S. Yield gap of alfalfa, ryegrass and oat grass and their influence factors in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(3):507-522. (in Chinese)
[9]	MUELLER N D, GERBER J S, JOHNSTON M. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature, 2012,490(7419):254-257. doi: 10.1038/nature11420
[10]	刘保花, 陈新平, 崔振岭, 孟庆锋, 赵明. 三大粮食作物产量潜力与产量差研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23(5):525-534.
	LIU B H, CHEN X P, CUI Z L, MENG Q F, ZHAO M. Research advance in yield potential and yield gap of three major cereal crops. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015,23(5):525-534. (in Chinese)
[11]	HOCHMAN Z, GOBBETT D, HOLZWORTH D. Reprint of “Quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: A case study of wheat in Australia”. Field Crops Research, 2013,143:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.02.001
[12]	LOBELL D B, CASSMAN K G, FIELD C B. Crop Yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2009,34(1):179-204. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740
[13]	LIANG W, CARBERRY P, WANG G. Quantifying the yield gap in wheat-maize cropping systems of the Hebei Plain, China. Field Crops Research, 2011,124(2):180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.07.010
[14]	王雪丽, 阮红燕, 黄智刚. 基于AEZ模型的广西甘蔗生产潜力分析. 作物杂志, 2015(1):121-126.
	WANG X L, RUAN H Y, HUANG Z G. Analysis on potential productivity of sugarcane in Guangxi Province based on AEZ model. Crops, 2015(1):121-126. (in Chinese)
[15]	SUMBERG J. Mind the (yield) gap(s). Food Security, 2012,4(4):509-518. doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0213-0
[16]	曹玉贤, 朱建强, 侯俊. 中国再生稻的产量差及影响因素. 中国农业科学, 2020,53(4):707-719.
	CAO Y X, ZHU J Q, HOU J. Yield gap of ratoon rice and their influence factors in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020,53(4):707-719. (in Chinese)
[17]	李恒锐, 蒙福山, 邱文武, 卢美瑛, 马文清, 彭崇. 甘蔗新品种(系)筛选试验. 中国糖料, 2015,37(1):11-13.
	LI H R, MENG F S, QIU W W, LU M Y, MA W Q, PENG C. Selecting test of new sugarcane varieties (Strain). Sugar Crops of China, 2015,37(1):11-13. (in Chinese)
[18]	欧克纬, 卢业飞, 李佳慧, 朱鹏锦, 周全光, 吕平, 程琴, 张宇, 庞新华. 广西引进甘蔗品种(系)的比较筛选与综合评价. 福建农业学报, 2020,35(4):414-421.
	OU K W, LU Y F, LI J H, ZHU P J, ZHOU Q G, LV P, CHENG Q, ZHANG Y, PANG X H. Screening and evaluation of sugarcane cultivars for germplasm collection in Guangxi. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020,35(4):414-421. (in Chinese)
[19]	邓海华, 谭步清, 何树林, 唐志军, 陈祖宏, 刘亚利, 吴凯南. CP65-357适宜下种量和施肥量的初步研究. 甘蔗糖业, 1999(1):5-10.
	DENG H H, TAN B Q, HE S L, TANG Z J, CHEN Z H, LIU Y L, WU K N. Preliminary studies on the rates of planting and N, P, K fertilization for CP65-357. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 1999(1):5-10. (in Chinese)
[20]	中华人民共和国国家统计局. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=A01, 2020.
	National Bureau of Statistics. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=A01, 2020. (in Chinese)
[21]	联合国粮食及农业组织. http://www.fao.org/home/zh, 2020.
	Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/home/zh, 2020. (in Chinese)
[22]	邓军, 李孝翠, 张跃彬. 云南甘蔗生产现状与发展对策. 甘蔗糖业, 2011(4):77-80.
	DENG J, LI X C, ZHANG Y B. The Current situation and development countermeasures of sugarcane production in Yunnan. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2011(4):77-80. (in Chinese)
[23]	串丽敏, 何萍, 赵同科. 作物推荐施肥方法研究进展. 中国农业科技导报, 2016,18(1):95-102.
	CHUAN L M, HE P, ZHAO T K. Research advance on recommendation for crop fertilization methodology. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016,18(1):95-102. (in Chinese)
[24]	李瑞民, 齐永文, 吴文龙. 雷州市甘蔗“3414”肥效试验初报. 甘蔗糖业, 2018(1):23-26.
	LI R M, QI Y W, WU W L. Report on “3414” fertilizer effect experiment of sugarcane in Leizhou. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2018(1):23-26. (in Chinese)
[25]	ZENG Y, ZHOU L Q, HUANG J S. Characteristics and evaluation of soil fertility in sugarcane-producing areas in Guangxi. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017(3):443-448, 451.
[26]	冯学娟, 张曼其, 吴刃, 梁明, 廖积贤, 陈东俊, 赵丽宏. 不同甘蔗品种在不同养分条件下的生长表现. 农家科技, 2019(3):29-30.
	FENG X J, ZHANG M Q, WU R, LIANG M, LIAO J X, CHEN D J, ZHAO L H. Growth performance of different sugarcane varieties under different nutrient conditions. Farm Technology, 2019(3):29-30. (in Chinese)
[27]	郭家文, 张跃彬, 刘少春, 崔雄维. 云南甘蔗主产区土壤有机质和速效养分分布研究. 土壤通报, 2010,41(4):872-876.
	GUO J W, ZHANG Y B, LIU S C, CUI X W. The distribution of soil organic matter and available nutrient of the sugar bait in Yunnan. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2010,41(4):872-876. (in Chinese)
[28]	郭家文, 刘少春, 张跃彬, 崔雄维, 刀静梅, 樊仙. 云南甘蔗主产区土壤pH、全氮磷钾的分布状况. 土壤, 2012,44(5):868-872.
	GUO J W, LIU S C, ZHANG Y B, CUI X W, DAO J M, FAN X. Distribution of soil pH and total N, P, K in main sugarcane fields in Yunnan Province. Soils, 2012,44(5):868-872. (in Chinese)
[29]	谭显平, 周英明, 刘军, 王果, 陈政, 李刚. 不同下种量对果蔗产量和品质影响的研究. 甘蔗糖业, 2012(5):13-25.
	TAN X P, ZHOU Y M, LIU J, WANG G, CHEN Z, LI G. Study on the effect of different seeding amount on fruit cane yield and quality. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2012(5):13-25. (in Chinese)
[30]	杨俊贤, 刘福业, 张允演. 粤糖93-159播种密度和施肥水平的研究. 甘蔗糖业, 2004(2):1-3, 36.
	YANG J X, LIU F Y, ZHANG Y Y. Study on the planting density and fertilization ratio for sugarcane variety Yuetang 93-159. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2004(2):1-3, 36. (in Chinese)
[31]	陆建勋, 邓展云, 刘晓静, 李鸣, 徐林, 贤武, 刘海斌. 不同种植密度对桂糖系列甘蔗新品种农艺性状及产量的影响. 广西农业科学, 2010,41(11):1170-1172.
	LU J X, DENG Z Y, LIU X J, LI M, XU L, XIAN W, LIU H B. Effects of different planting densities on yield and agronomic characters of Guitang series sugarcane varieties. Guangxi Agricultural Sciences, 2010,41(11):1170-1172. (in Chinese)
[32]	黄曲燕, 李毅杰, 梁强, 林善海, 黄海荣, 李翔. 不同甘蔗基因型在南宁蔗区的适应性表现. 广西糖业, 2018(2):10-13.
	HUANG Q Y, LI Y J, LIANG Q, LIN S H, HUANG H R, LI X. Adaptability of different sugarcane genotypes in Nanning sugarcane area. Guangxi Sugar Industry, 2018(2):10-13. (in Chinese)
[33]	覃新福. 2015/2016年甘蔗新品种(系)比较试验初报. 广西糖业, 2018(1):3-6.
	TAN X F. Preliminary report on comparison test of new sugarcane varieties (lines) in 2015/2016. Guangxi Sugar Industry, 2018(1):3-6. (in Chinese)
[34]	李杨瑞. 广西甘蔗生产中的主要问题及几点建议. 广西糖业, 2020(4):3-7.
	LI Y R. The main problems in the sugarcane production in Guangxi and a few suggestions. Guangxi Sugar Industry, 2020(4):3-7. (in Chinese)
[35]	王伦旺, 廖江雄, 谭芳, 唐仕云, 黄家雍, 李翔, 杨荣仲, 李杨瑞, 黄海荣, 经艳, 邓宇驰. 高产高糖抗倒伏甘蔗新品种桂糖42号的选育及高产栽培技术. 南方农业学报, 2015,46(8):1361-1366.
	WANG L W, LIAO J X, TAN F, TANG S Y, HUANG J Y, LI X, YANG R Z, LI Y R, HUANG H R, JING Y, DENG Y C. Breeding of new high-yield, high-sugar and lodging-resistant sugarcane variety Guitang 42 and its high-yield cultivation technique. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2015,46(8):1361-1366. (in Chinese)
[36]	游奕来, 甘道建, 周柏权, 李伯欣, 唐拴虎, 徐培智. 控释肥料在甘蔗生产上的应用效果研究. 广东农业科学, 2008(6):18-19.
	YOU Y L, GAN D J, ZHOU B Q, LI B X, TANG S H, XU P Z. Study on application effect of controlled release fertilizer in sugarcane production. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2008(6):18-19. (in Chinese)
[37]	陈杨, 樊明寿, 康文钦, 秦永林. 内蒙古阴山丘陵地区马铃薯施肥现状与评价. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012 (2):104-108.
	CHEN Y, FAN M S, KANG W Q, QIN Y L. Evaluation and present situation of fertilization for potato in hilly country of Yinshan in Inner Mongolia. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2012(2):104-108. (in Chinese)
[38]	郭家文, 刘少春, 王龙, 张跃彬, 崔雄维. 25年来两类植蔗土壤肥力演变及原因分析—以云南陇川农场为例. 土壤, 2010,42(2):219-223.
	GUO J W, LIU S C, WANG L, ZHANG Y B, CUI X W. Changes and mechanism of soil fertility under two kinds of sugarcane cultivations during 25 years—A case study of Longchuan Farm, Yunnan Province. Soils, 2010,42(2):219-223. (in Chinese)
[39]	张跃彬. 我国蔗糖产业安全问题与发展对策. 中国糖料, 2019,41(1):66-68.
	ZHANG Y B. Safety Problems and development countermeasures of cane sugar industry in China. Sugar Crops of China, 2019,41(1):66-68. (in Chinese)
[40]	全怡吉, 武晋宇, 李如丹, 樊仙, 刀静梅, 杨绍林, 邓军. 云南省蔗糖产业发展现状分析. 中国糖料, 2019,41(4):76-80.
	QUAN Y J, WU J Y, LI R D, FAN X, DAO J M, YANG S L, DENG J. Analysis on the current situation of cane sugar industry in Yunnan Province. Sugar Crops of China, 2019,41(4):76-80. (in Chinese)
[41]	朱卫江. 我国甘蔗机械化收获现状与发展路径选择. 农机质量与监督, 2019(10):30-32.
	ZHU W J. Current situation of sugarcane mechanized harvesting in China and development path selection. Agricultural Machinery Quality & Supervision, 2019(10):30-32. (in Chinese)

Related Articles 15

[1]	LI XingYu, HUANG Rong, XIAN YiMing, TIAN JiaoJiao, MA XiaoJin, YANG QiaoXi, LI Bing, WANG ChangQuan. Characteristics of Organic Carbon Fractions and Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Different Size Aggregates in Rice Field Soils in Response to Long-Term Fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1255-1271.
[2]	WEI YuanHui, YU YiHui, LI ZiJun, DING WenJie, TU WenLong, MAO YanLing. Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on Soil Organic Carbon Structure and Carbon-Fixing Bacterial Community Structure in Yellow-Mud Paddy Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1020-1033.
[3]	LI WenHu, LI HaiFeng, DU YuPeng, DING YuLan, LUO YiNuo, LI YuKe, SHE WenTing, ZHANG Feng, TENG Yu, ZHANG SiQi, HUANG Cui, LI XiaoHan, LIU JinShan, WANG ZhaoHui. Regional Differences in Wheat Zinc Uptake and Translocation Responses to Soil Zinc Fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1034-1047.
[4]	YANG Yan, JIANG LiHua, LI Ni, SHI Jing, TAN DeShui, LIU YuMin, ZHAO HuanYu, XU Yu. Water and Fertilizer Management for Reducing Nitrogen Leaching in Facility Vegetable Fields and Achieving Concurrent Yield Increase and Efficiency Improvement [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 850-861.
[5]	YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[6]	CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[7]	WANG RenZhuo, LI YueYing, HUANG ShaoMin, JIANG GuiYing, ZHANG Qi, LIU ChaoLin, YANG Jin, WANG MengRu, WANG BeiBei, LIU Fang, GUO DouDou, JIE XiaoLei, SONG Lian, LIU ShiLiang. Effects of Long-Term Combination of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Bacterial Community Structure, Ecological Network, and Key Species in Fluvo-Aquic Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 354-367.
[8]	GUO HuiTing, SUN YanWen, NIU YiHeng, LI YaPeng, LI JianHua, XU MingGang. Fertilization Significantly Changed Soil Bacterial Diversity and Dominant Microbial Community in Croplands of Northern China—Meta Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 114-128.
[9]	LÜ XuDong, SUN ShiYuan, LI YaNan, LIU YuLong, WANG YanQun, FU Xin, ZHANG JiaYing, NING Peng, PENG ZhengPing. Effects of Intelligent Mechanized Layered Fertilization on Root-Soil Nutrient Distribution and Yield in Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 129-146.
[10]	WEI WenHua, LI Pan, SHAO GuanGui, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, FAN Hong, HE Wei, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LianHao. Response of Silage Maize Yield and Quality to Reduced Irrigation and Combined Organic-Inorganic Fertilizer in Northwest Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1521-1534.
[11]	BAI YuXin, LIU LingZhi, AN TingTing, LI ShuangYi, WANG JingKuan. Eeffects of Long-Term Fertilization on Bacterial Community Structure and Carbon Metabolic Functions in Brown Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1579-1590.
[12]	CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, SHAO GuanGui, WU XiaYu, YIN Wen, ZHAO LianHao, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong. The Regulatory Effect of Reduced Irrigation and Combined Organic- Inorganic Fertilizer Application on Stay-Green Characteristics in Silage Maize Leaves After Tasseling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1381-1396.
[13]	ZHAO Yao, CHENG Qian, XU TianJun, LIU Zheng, WANG RongHuan, ZHAO JiuRan, LU DaLei, LI CongFeng. Effects of Plant Type Improvement on Root-Canopy Characteristics and Grain Yield of Spring Maize Under High Density Condition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1296-1310.
[14]	TIAN Lei, SHAO Xin, ZHOU YiMin, MIAO XiuZhen, JI Nan, WANG Hao, SHI MingShuai, ZHANG YueZhong. Selection of Maize Planting Density and Dense-Planting Tolerant and Lodging-Resistant Varieties in the Southern Foothills of the Greater Khingan Mountains under Multi-Factor Management [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5143-5155.
[15]	WANG TongChao, YU NingNing, CUI Dong, REN BaiZhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, REN Hao, XIONG Wei, ZHANG JiWang. Regulation of Fertilization and Kernel Set Characteristics in Summer Maize by Planting Density Under Drip Fertigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5156-5174.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

省（自治区、直辖市） Province (autonomous region, municipality)		产量 Yield (×10⁴ t)	种植面积 Planting area (×10³ hm²)	单位产量 Unit yield (t·hm^-2)
广西	Guangxi	7292.8	886.4	82.3
云南	Yunnan	1640.1	260.1	63.1
广东	Guangdong	1412.7	172.6	81.9
海南	Hainan	132.5	20.8	63.8
江西	Jiangxi	64.6	14.3	45.0
贵州	Guizhou	62.5	10.6	59.1
浙江	Zhejiang	40.6	6.2	66.0
四川	Sichuan	36.2	9.3	38.7
湖南	Hunan	33.8	7.4	45.8
湖北	Hubei	27.7	6.5	43.0
福建	Fujian	26.1	4.9	53.3
河南	Henan	15.4	2.0	75.8
安徽	Anhui	10.1	1.7	58.1
重庆	Chongqing	9.1	2.2	41.5
江苏	Jiangsu	5.3	0.9	61.9
上海	Shanghai	0.2	0.1	34.3
陕西	Shaanxi	0.1	0.0	25.0

Analysis of Yield Gaps and Limiting Factors in China’s Main Sugarcane Production Areas

RichHTML

PDF