Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (14): 2919-2928.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.14.015

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Response Characteristics of Green Onion (Allium fistulosum L.) to LED Light Quality Under Artificial Climate Chamber

GAO Song(),LIU XueNa,LIU Ying,CAO BiLi,CHEN ZiJing,XU Kun()   

  1. 1 College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University/Collaborative Innovation Center of Fruit & Vegetable Quality and Efficient Production in Shandong/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops in Huanghuai Region, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2019-12-19 Accepted:2020-02-02 Online:2020-07-16 Published:2020-08-10
  • Contact: Kun XU E-mail:songgao@sdau.edu.cn;xukun@sdau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】The purpose was to explore the response characteristics of green onion growth, product quality and photosynthetic characteristics of green onions to different light qualities, and to provide technical parameters for optimizing the regulation of light environment in industrial production of green onions and improve the production efficiency of green onions based on fresh green leaves. 【Method】 Under the condition of LED light source in artificial climate chamber, two different varieties of green onion ‘Zhangqiu’ and ‘Tianguang’ were used as experimental materials. The seedlings of green onion with about 15 cm in seedling height and 2-3 pieces of true leaves were cultured under five different light qualities, including blue light (B), red light (R), green light (G), yellow light (Y) and white light (W). The light intensity was controlled at (301.6 ± 12.7) μmol·m-2·s-1, the light time was 12 h/d, and the day/night temperature was controlled at 25℃/18℃, respectively. Samples were taken at 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 days after treatment, and the photosynthetic parameters of green onions treated with different light quality were measured, as well as the growth and product quality of green onion at 40 days of culture. 【Result】The growth, product quality, leaf pigment content, photosynthetic rate (Pn), apparent quantum efficiency (AQY) and RuBP maximum regeneration rate of green onion under W were significantly better than those under monochromatic light. After 40 days of culture, the fresh weight (FW) per plant of green onion treated with W was 25.21 g, which was 7.83%, 20.28%, 35.68% and 60.78% higher than B, R, G and Y, respectively. The Pn under W was 7.63 μmol·m-2·s-1, which was 11.39%, 24.07%, 39.23% and 59.62% higher than B, R, G and Y, respectively. The photo-saturated photosynthetic rate (Pmax) under W reached 13.29 μmol·m-2·s-1, which was 5.39%, 9.47%, 15.57% and 21.48% higher than B, R, G and Y, respectively. There was no significant difference in light saturation point (LSP) among other monochromatic light, while the light compensation point (LCP) was higher in Y, followed by G and R, and lower in B and W. There were also significant differences among different monochromatic light, the FW per plant of B was significantly higher than Y, which reached 24.22 g and 16.52 g, respectively, G and R were in the middle. Pn, AQY, Pmax, carboxylation efficiency (CE) and maximum regeneration rate of RuBP of green onion leaves treated with B were also significantly higher than those of other monochromatic light. The quality indexes in green onion, such as soluble sugar, crude cellulose, pyruvate, soluble protein, free amino acid and dry matter in W, were significantly higher than those in monochromatic light. However, the B was higher among the monochromatic light, and the others were red light, green light, and yellow light in order. 【Conclusion】 The W was the most beneficial to the growth of green onions, which showed that the photosynthetic efficiency of leaves was higher and the product quality was better, and the effect of each monochromatic light treatment was higher than B, followed by R, Y and G. It reflected that green onions had strong utilization ability to W and B, which laid a foundation for further study on the formation of yield and quality of green onions by compound light.

Key words: green onion (Allium fistulosum L.), artificial climate chamber, LED, light quality, growth, quality, photosynthesis

Fig. 1

Adjustable LED light source culture frame 1: Central air conditioning and fresh air system: increase air flow, control indoor temperature; 2: Air chamber; 3: Humidification pipeline: humid air is thoroughly mixed in the air chamber and sent to the various layers of the cultivation rack by the fresh air system; 4: Shutter: filter; 5: Light tube; 6: Cultivation rack placement layer; 7: Light intensity adjuster; 8: Power supply; 9: Microcomputer automatic time switch"

Fig. 2

Characteristics of representative irradiance spectrum under different treatments W:White light;B:Blue light;G:Green light;Y:Yellow light;R: Red light。The same as below"

Table 1

Effects of different light qualities on the growth of green onion"

处理
Treatment
叶片数
Leaf number
株高
Plant height
(cm)
假茎长
Cauloid length (cm)
假茎粗
Cauloid diameter
(mm)
叶片鲜重
Leaf FW
(g)
假茎鲜重
Cauloid FW
(g)
根系鲜重
Root FW
(g)
单株鲜重
Per plant FW
(g)
ZQ W 6.40±0.55a 47.24±1.44a 9.90±0.65a 9.88±0.38a 14.70±0.70a 9.34±0.52a 1.61±0.07a 25.64±1.14a
B 6.00±0.71ab 45.20±0.91b 10.00±0.61a 9.25±0.28b 14.10±0.53a 8.52±0.68b 1.33±0.06b 23.95±1.03b
G 5.00±0.71cd 37.28±1.57d 8.68±0.31b 7.75±0.08c 11.04±0.46c 6.93±0.68c 1.22±0.12b 19.18±0.72d
Y 4.60±0.55d 33.84±1.16e 7.98±0.31c 7.37±0.32d 9.54±0.43d 5.33±0.55d 1.05±0.08c 15.92±0.33e
R 5.40±0.55bc 40.30±1.35c 9.40±0.42a 9.17±0.12b 13.03±0.39b 8.61±0.27b 1.24±0.06b 22.87±0.62c
TG W 5.60±0.55a 47.10±1.24a 9.76±0.43ab 8.82±0.32a 14.84±0.44a 8.83±0.41a 1.11±0.07a 24.78±0.47a
B 5.40±0.55ab 44.66±1.27b 10.14±0.72a 8.70±0.25a 13.92±0.33b 7.92±0.39b 0.97±0.08b 22.81±0.46b
G 4.60±0.55cd 39.70±0.76d 9.30±0.45b 8.20±0.20b 11.47±0.69c 5.78±0.44c 0.73±0.03d 17.98±0.52c
Y 4.00±0.00d 33.04±1.02e 7.00±0.35d 7.31±0.16c 9.71±0.30d 4.90±0.44d 0.83±0.24cd 15.43±0.71d
R 4.80±0.45bc 42.64±2.17c 8.66±0.55c 7.62±0.17c 11.99±0.29c 6.10±0.21c 0.95±0.06bc 19.04±0.36c

Table 2

Multiple Comparison of different light qualities on the growth of green onion"

处理
Treatment
叶片数
Leaf number
(No.)
株高
Plant height (cm)
假茎长
Cauloid length (cm)
假茎粗
Cauloid diameter (mm)
叶片鲜重
Leaf FW
(g)
假茎鲜重
Cauloid FW
(g)
根系鲜重
Root FW
(g)
单株鲜重
Per plant FW
(g)
品种
Variety
ZQ 5.48±0.87a 40.77±5.18a 9.19±0.90a 8.69±1.01a 12.48±2.02a 7.75±1.56a 1.29±0.20a 21.51±3.66a
TG 4.88±0.73b 41.43±5.10a 8.97±1.22a 8.13±0.64b 12.38±1.90a 6.71±1.52b 0.92±0.17b 20.01±3.47b
光质
Light quality
W 6.00±0.67a 47.17±1.27a 9.83±0.53a 9.35±0.65a 14.77±0.56a 9.08±0.51a 1.36±0.27a 25.21±0.94a
B 5.70±0.67a 44.93±1.08b 10.07±0.64a 8.98±0.38b 14.01±0.43b 8.22±0.61b 1.15±0.20b 23.38±0.96b
G 4.80±0.63b 38.49±1.72d 8.99±0.49b 7.97±0.27d 11.25±0.60d 6.35±0.81d 0.97±0.27c 18.58±0.87d
Y 4.30±0.48c 33.44±1.11e 7.49±0.60c 7.34±0.24e 9.62±0.36e 5.12±0.52e 0.94±0.20c 15.68±0.58e
R 5.10±0.57b 41.47±2.11c 9.03±0.60b 8.40±0.83c 12.51±0.64c 7.36±1.34c 1.09±0.16b 20.96±2.08c
PP-value
品种 Var. 0.0004 0.0918 0.1275 0.0000 0.4799 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
光质 LQ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
品种×光质Var.×LQ 0.9541 0.0150 0.0060 0.0000 0.0136 0.0001 0.0155 0.0000

Table 3

Effects of different light qualities on quality in green onion"

处理
Treatment
可溶性糖
Soluble sugar
(%)
粗纤维
Crude cellulose
(mg?g-1)
丙酮酸
Pyruvate
(mg?g-1)
可溶性蛋白
Soluble protein
(mg?g-1)
游离氨基酸
Free amino acid
(mg?g-1)
干物质
Dry matter
(%)
ZQ W 1.46±0.04a 0.24±0.00a 1.03±0.02a 1.43±0.01a 0.93±0.05a 8.42±0.08a
B 1.36±0.12a 0.19±0.00b 0.95±0.02b 1.16±0.02b 0.90±0.04a 8.22±0.10b
G 0.93±0.03c 0.11±0.01d 0.48±0.03e 1.00±0.02d 0.78±0.04b 7.60±0.17d
Y 0.70±0.06d 0.08±0.00e 0.64±0.05d 0.92±0.01e 0.69±0.05c 7.24±0.11e
R 1.15±0.03b 0.14±0.01c 0.83±0.02c 1.07±0.02c 0.89±0.05a 7.97±0.09c
TG W 2.14±0.10a 0.14±0.00a 1.04±0.02a 1.51±0.04b 0.89±0.04a 7.96±0.09a
B 1.82±0.05b 0.10±0.00b 0.95±0.02b 1.60±0.05a 0.76±0.04b 7.74±0.11b
G 1.36±0.12d 0.09±0.00c 0.42±0.01e 0.78±0.05d 0.60±0.03c 7.00±0.18d
Y 0.80±0.05e 0.06±0.01d 0.52±0.02d 0.67±0.02e 0.59±0.04c 6.83±0.18e
R 1.58±0.03c 0.10±0.01b 0.83±0.03c 1.00±0.02c 0.70±0.04b 7.43±0.13c

Table 4

Multiple Comparison of different light quality on quality in Green onion"

处理
Treatment
可溶性糖
Soluble sugar
(%)
粗纤维
Crude cellulose
(mg?g-1)
丙酮酸
Pyruvate
(mg?g-1)
可溶性蛋白
Soluble protein
(mg?g-1)
游离氨基酸
Free amino acid
(mg?g-1)
干物质
Dry matter
(%)
品种
Variety
ZQ 1.12±0.29b 0.15±0.06a 0.79±0.21a 1.11±0.18a 0.84±0.10a 7.89±0.44a
TG 1.54±0.47a 0.10±0.03b 0.75±0.25b 1.11±0.39a 0.71±0.12b 7.39±0.46b
光质
Light quality
W 1.80±0.38a 0.19±0.06a 1.04±0.02a 1.47±0.05a 0.91±0.05a 8.19±0.25a
B 1.59±0.26b 0.15±0.05b 0.95±0.02b 1.38±0.24b 0.83±0.08b 7.98±0.27b
G 1.14±0.25d 0.10±0.01d 0.45±0.04e 0.89±0.13d 0.69±0.10c 7.30±0.36d
Y 0.75±0.07e 0.07±0.01e 0.58±0.07d 0.79±0.13e 0.64±0.07c 7.03±0.26e
R 1.36±0.24c 0.12±0.02c 0.83±0.02c 1.03±0.04c 0.80±0.11b 7.70±0.31c
PP-value
品种Var.
光质LQ
品种×光质Var.×LQ
0.0000 0.0000 0.0031 0.8627 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0020 0.0000 0.0485 0.5240

Fig. 3

Effects of different light qualities on pigment content in green onion leaves Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05). The same as below"

Fig. 4

Effects of different light qualities on dynamic changes of Pn and Gs in green onion leaves"

Fig. 5

Effects of different light qualities on Pn-PFD and Pn-CO2 in green onion leaves"

Table 5

Effects of different light quality on photosynthetic characteristics in green onion leaves"

处理
Treatment
表观光合
量子效率
AQY
光饱和点
LSP
(μmol·m-2·s-1)
光饱和光合
速率 Pmax
(μmol·m-2·s-1)
光补偿点
LCP
(μmol·m-2·s-1)
羧化效率
CE
CO2饱和点CSP
(μl·L-1)
CO2补偿点CCP
(μl·L-1)
RuBP最大再生速率
Maximum RuBP regeneration rate (μmol·m-2·s-1)
品种
Variety
ZQ 0.0479a 1157.59b 12.54a 56.25b 0.0698a 1376.92b 71.05b 36.64a
TG 0.0489a 1303.91a 11.65b 71.97a 0.0674b 1418.73a 75.69a 35.56b
光质
Light quality
W 0.0542a 1297.13a 13.29a 45.61e 0.0780a 1386.15b 57.35e 38.98a
B 0.0504b 1193.44b 12.61b 48.30d 0.0720b 1388.97b 66.21d 37.23b
G 0.0454d 1216.30b 11.50d 77.12b 0.0640d 1401.43a 80.28b 34.89d
Y 0.0439d 1195.32b 10.94e 85.62a 0.0607e 1404.76a 88.09a 32.98e
R 0.0481c 1251.55ab 12.14c 63.90c 0.0683c 1407.81a 74.90c 36.41c
PP-value
品种Var. 0.1426 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000
光质LQ 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000
品种×光Var.×LQ 0.3187 0.0445 0.0000 0.0000 0.0003 0.0416 0.0499 0.0000
[1] JIAO Y L, LAU O S, DENG X W. Light regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2007,8(3):217-230.
doi: 10.1038/nrg2049 pmid: 17304247
[2] YAMAZAKI J. Is light quality involved in the regulation of the photosynthetic apparatus in attached rice leaves? Photosynthesis research, 2010,105(1):63-71.
pmid: 20532628
[3] FAN Y G, ZHAO X X, WANG H Y, TIAN Y Y, XIANG Q Z, ZHANG L X. Effects of light intensity on metabolism of light-harvesting pigment and photosynthetic system in Camellia sinensis L. cultivar 'Huangjinya'. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019,166:103796.
[4] WANG X X, FU X L, CHEN M, HUAN L, LIU W H, QI Y H, GAO Y G, XIAO W, CHEN X D, LI L, GAO D S. Ultraviolet B irradiation influences the fruit quality and sucrose metabolism of peach (Prunus persica L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018,153:286-301.
[5] JOHKAN M, SHOJI K, GOTO F, HASHIDA S, YOSHIHARA T. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. HortScience, 2010,45(12):1809-1814.
[6] HOGEWONING SW, TROUWBORST G, MALJAARS H, POORTER H, VAN IEPEREN W, HARBINSON J. Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010,61(11):3107-3117.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq132 pmid: 20504875
[7] JING X, WANG H, GONG B, LIU S Q, WEI M, AI X Z, LI Y, SHI Q H. Secondary and sucrose metabolism regulated by different light quality combinations involved in melon tolerance to powdery mildew. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018,124:77-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.12.039 pmid: 29353685
[8] 许莉, 刘世琦, 齐连东, 梁庆玲, 于文艳. 不同光质对叶用莴苣光合作用及叶绿素荧光的影响. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(1):96-100.
XU L, LIU S Q, QI L D, LIANG Q L, YU W Y. Effect of light quality on leaf lettuce photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007,23(1):96-100. (in Chinese)
[9] 李亚华, 陈龙, 高荣广, 杨凤娟, 王秀峰, 魏珉, 史庆华, 米庆华. LED光质对茄子果实品质及抗氧化能力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(9):2728-2734.
pmid: 26785555
LI Y H, CHEN L, GAO R G, YANG F J, WANG X F, WEI M, SHI Q H, MI Q H. Effects of LED qualities on quality and antioxidation capacity of eggplant fruits. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(9):2728-2734. (in Chinese)
pmid: 26785555
[10] QIAN H M, LIU T Y, DENG M D, MIAO H Y, CAI C X, SHEN W S, WANG Q M. Effects of light quality on main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant capacity of Chinese kale sprouts. Food Chemistry, 2016,196:1232-1238.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.055 pmid: 26593611
[11] 刘庆, 连海峰, 刘世琦, 孙亚丽, 于新会, 郭会平. 不同光质LED光源对草莓光合特性, 产量及品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(6):1743-1750.
pmid: 26572027
LIU Q, LIAN H F, LIU S Q, SUN Y L, YU X H, GUO H P. Effects of different LED light qualities on photosynthetic characteristics, fruit production and quality of strawberry. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(6):1743-1750. (in Chinese)
pmid: 26572027
[12] SARTORY D P, GROBBELAAR J U. Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis. Hydrobiologia, 1984,114(3):177-187.
[13] 赵世杰, 刘华山, 董新纯. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1998.
ZHAO S J, LIU H S, DONG X C. Techniques of Plant Physiological Experiment. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1998. (in Chinese)
[14] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
LI H S. The Principle and Technology of Plant physiology and Biochemistry Experiment. Beijing: High Education Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[15] 文树基. 基础生物化学实验指导. 西安: 陕西科学技术出版社, 1994.
WEN S J. Guide of Biochemistry Experiment. Xi'an: Shaanxi Science and Technology Press, 1994. (in Chinese)
[16] YE Z P, ROBAKOWSKI P, SUGGETT D J, KANG H J. A mechanistic model for the photosynthesis-light response based on the photosynthetic electron transport of photosystem II in C3 and C4 species. New Phytologist, 2013,199:110-120.
doi: 10.1111/nph.12242 pmid: 23521402
[17] ZUO Z C, MENG Y Y, YU X H, ZHANG Z L, FENG D S, SUN S F, LIU B, LIN C T. A study of the blue-light-dependent phosphorylation, degradation, and photobody formation of arabidopsis CRY2. Molecular Plant, 2012,5(3):726-733.
doi: 10.1093/mp/sss007 pmid: 22311776
[18] YANG F, WANG X C, LIAO D P, LU F Z, GAO R C, LIU W G, YONG T W, WU X L, DU J B, LIU J, YANG W Y. Yield response to different planting geometries in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 2014,107(1):296-304.
[19] SU N N, WU Q, SHEN Z G, XIA K, CUI J. Effects of light quality on the chloroplastic ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation, 2014,73:227-235.
[20] WANG J, LU W, TONG Y X, YANG Q C. Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:250.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00250 pmid: 27014285
[21] 郑洁, 胡美君, 郭延平. 光质对植物光合作用的调控及其机理. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(7):1619-1624.
pmid: 18839928
ZHENG J, HU M J, GUO Y P. Regulation of photosynthesis by light quality and its mechanism in plants. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008,19(7):1619-1624. (in Chinese)
pmid: 18839928
[22] 许大全, 高伟, 阮军. 光质对植物生长发育的影响. 植物生理学报, 2015,51(8):1217-1234.
XU D Q, GAO W, RUAN J. Effects of light quality on plant growth and development. Plant Physiology Journal, 2015,51(8):1217-1234. (in Chinese)
[23] TAIZ L, ZEIGER E. Plant Physiology. Third Edition.UNITED STATES American Society of Plant Biologists, 2002:112-119.
[24] 曹刚, 张国斌, 郁继华, 马彦霞. 不同光质LED光源对黄瓜苗期生长及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(6):1297-1304.
CAO G, ZHANG G B, YU J H, MA Y X. Effects of different LED light qualities on cucumber seedling growth and chlorophyll fuorescence parameters. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,46(6):1297-1304. (in Chinese)
[25] 巩彪, 靳志勇, 刘娜, 刘世琦, 王秀峰, 艾希珍, 魏珉, 史庆华. 光质对紫背天葵生长, 次生代谢和抗氧化胁迫的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(11):3577-3584.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201611.039 pmid: 29696855
GONG B, JIN Z Y, LIU N, LIU S Q, WANG X F, AI X Z, WEI M, SHI Q H. Effects of light quality on growth, secondary metabolites, and oxidative stress tolerance of Gynura bicolor. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(11):3577-3584. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201611.039 pmid: 29696855
[26] 张瑞华, 徐坤, 董灿兴, 李莹莹, 吕杰. 光质对姜生长及光能利用特性的影响. 园艺学报, 2008,35(5):673-680.
ZHANG R H, XU K, DONG C X, LI Y Y, LÜ J. Effects of light quality on growth and light utilization characteristics in ginger. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008,35(5):673-680. (in Chinese)
[27] WANG H, GU M, CUI J X, SHI K, ZHOU Y H, YU J Q. Effects of light quality on CO2 assimilation, chlorophyll fluorescence quenching, expression of Calvin cycle genes and carbohydrate accumulation in Cucumis sativus. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2009,96:30-37.
[28] 张磊, 刘维正, 辛国胜, 韩俊杰, 商丽丽, 邱鹏飞, 林祖军. 3种专用型甘薯光合光响应曲线及其模型拟合研究. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(15):71-77.
ZHANG L, LIU W Z, XIN G S, HAN J J, SHANG L L, QIU P F, LIN Z J. Photosynthesis light response curves of three sweet-potato varieties and model fitting. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015,31(15):71-77. (in Chinese)
[29] LIN K H, HUANG M Y, HUANG W D, HSU M H, YANG Z W, YANG C M. The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Scientia Horticulturae, 2013,150:86-91.
[30] 李岩, 王丽伟, 文莲莲, 魏珉, 史庆华, 杨凤娟, 王秀峰. 红蓝光质对转色期间番茄果实主要品质的影响. 园艺学报, 2017,44(12):2372-2382.
LI Y, WANG L W, WEN L L, WEI M, SHI Q H, YANG F J, WANG X F. Effects of red and blue light qualities on main fruit quality of tomato during color-turning period. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017,44(12):2372-2382. (in Chinese)
[31] KODERA Y, SUZUKI A, IMADA O, KASUGA S, SUMIOKA I, KANEZAWA A, TARU N, FUJIKAWA M, NAGAE S, MASAMOTO K, MAESHIGE K, ONO K. Physical, chemical, and biological properties of S-allylcysteine, an amino acid derived from garlic. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2002,50:622-632.
pmid: 11804540
[32] RANDLE W M, KOPSELL D A, KOPSELL D E, SNYDER R L, TORRANCE R. Field sampling short-day onions for bulb pungency. HortTechnology, 1998,8:329-332.
[33] 孔灵君, 徐坤, 王磊, 何平, 张永征. 氮硫互作对越冬大葱生长及品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(5):1272-1278.
KONG L J, XU K, WANG L, HE P, ZHANG Y Z. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur interaction on growth and quality of Chinese spring onion. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013,19(5):1272-1278. (in Chinese)
[1] YUE LiXin, WANG QingHua, WANG ZhenBao, NIMAQIONGJI, LIU ZeZhou, KONG SuPing, ZHANG LiFeng, GAO LiMin. Widely Targeted Metabolomics-Based Analysis of the Differences in Tibetan Bunching Onion and Chive on Nutritional Quality and Flavonoid Metabolites [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1070-1086.
[2] ZHANG LiDong, GUO YiCong, HUANG HongYu, NIE Jing, WANG Bing, LI MengYu, LI JiaWang, SUI XiaoLei, LI YuHe. Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100.
[3] WANG ShaoHua, FAN QiuLi, YANG JinChang, SUN YuJie, YU Niu, JIANG ShouQun. Effects of Different Levels of Mytilaria laosensis Leaves Feeding on Growth Performance, Immune Function, Antioxidant Capacity, Carcass Quality and Meat Quality of Yellow-Feathered Chickens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1111-1127.
[4] LIU HaiQing, JIN JiaoJiao, SUN WanCang, CHAI Peng, QI WeiLiang, YANG Gang, LI Chan, LUO XueMei, SU YunYun, QIN XueXue. Morphogenesis of the Low-Growth Point and Its Multi-Hormonal Regulatory Mechanism During Overwintering in Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 951-966.
[5] DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[6] HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[7] YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[8] ZHANG MengBo, TAN HongBing, SHEN Tian, XU MeiLong, ZHOU XinMing, FANG YuLin, JU YanLun. Effects of Different Irrigation Amounts and Anti-transpirant Treatments on Wine Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 413-426.
[9] LU Hao, ZHANG MingLong, HAN Mei, YAN QingBiao, LI ZhengPeng, YIN Wen, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang. Green Manure Returning via Sheep Digest with Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction are Beneficial to Improve Wheat Yield and Soil Quality at Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 147-160.
[10] FU Han, YU Yang, AI Niu, ZHANG SiQing, YU LianWei, SUN ShuHao, ZHAO JinZhang, HAN XiaoYu, SHI Yan, YANG Xue. The Photosystem II Protein NbPsbQ1 Inhibits Viral Infection by Promoting Photosynthetic Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 90-100.
[11] JI ShengYang, LU BaiYi, LI PeiWu. Some Reflections on Modern Science of Agricultural Product Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1830-1844.
[12] LIU JinSong, WU LongMei, BAO XiaoZhe, LIU ZhiXia, ZHANG Bin, YANG TaoTao. Effects of a Short-Term Reduction in Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates on the Grain Yield and Rice Quality of Early and Late-Season Dual-Use Rice in South China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1508-1520.
[13] WEI WenHua, LI Pan, SHAO GuanGui, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, FAN Hong, HE Wei, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LianHao. Response of Silage Maize Yield and Quality to Reduced Irrigation and Combined Organic-Inorganic Fertilizer in Northwest Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1521-1534.
[14] XUE YuQi, ZHAO JiYu, SUN WangSheng, REN BaiZhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG JiWang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms on Yield and Quality of Summer Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1535-1549.
[15] ZHANG YaFeng, DONG WeiJin, LI QiYun, LU Yang, ZHANG ZhengKun, SUI Li. Effect of Interaction Between Beauveria bassiana and Potassium on Tomato Fruit Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1131-1144.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!