Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2010, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (19): 4101-4108 .doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.19.024

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Nonlinear Mixed Effect Model for Evaluation of Muscovy Body Weight for Growth

ZHANG Yuan-yue, LIU Xiao-chun   

  1. (湖南农业大学动物科学技术学院)
  • Received:2010-03-22 Revised:2010-07-01 Online:2010-10-01 Published:2010-10-01
  • Contact: LIU Xiao-chun

Abstract:

【Objective】 The aim of the study is to describe and estimate the trajectory and parameters of body weight growth of native Muscovy. 【Method】 One hundred and sixteen Muscovy ducks were fed and observed for 21 weeks, five body weight growth functions including Gompertz, Logistic, Von Bertalanffy, Richards, and Brody were estimated, nonlinear mixed effect models were fitted to data of body weight in Muscovy, and the 8 growth parameters including mature weight, Point of inflection (POI), POI weight, birth weight, absolute growth rate, relative growth rate, absolute maturing rate, and relative maturing rate were computed for these models in this study. The results of fitting and estimating with these different growth models were compared using information criteria,error variance, and accuracy of estimated growth parameters for evaluating the alternative models. 【Result】 The 5 nonlinear mixed effect models with 8 growth parameters each were fit for body weight of Muscovy ducks. Their accuracies had a much larger increase than these of the nonlinear fixed effect models. Among the 5 nonlinear mixed effect models for the body growth of female and male Muscovy, information criteria of Gompertz growth model were least, and reduction of residual error variance of this model was up to 99.92%. For the body growth of male or female Muscovy, information criteria of Richards growth model was least among the 5 nonlinear mixed effect models. Reduction of residual error variance of this model was up to 89.80% for male group, 91.81% for female group. 【Conclusion】 Gompertz,Richards nonlinear mixed effect models are best growth models for fitting the body growth of Muscovy,for male or female Muscovy, respectively.

Key words: nonlinear mixed effect model, body growth, muscovy duck, evaluation

[1] ZHU DaWei,ZHANG LinPing,CHEN MingXue,FANG ChangYun,YU YongHong,ZHENG XiaoLong,SHAO YaFang. Characteristics of High-Quality Rice Varieties and Taste Sensory Evaluation Values in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1271-1283.
[2] WANG YangYang,LIU WanDai,HE Li,REN DeChao,DUAN JianZhao,HU Xin,GUO TianCai,WANG YongHua,FENG Wei. Evaluation of Low Temperature Freezing Injury in Winter Wheat and Difference Analysis of Water Effect Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[3] GOU ZhiWen,YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,FAN Hong. Analysis of Sustainability of Multiple Cropping Green Manure in Wheat-Maize Intercropping After Wheat Harvested in Arid Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[4] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[5] ZHANG YaLing, GAO Qing, ZHAO Yuhan, LIU Rui, FU Zhongju, LI Xue, SUN Yujia, JIN XueHui. Evaluation of Rice Blast Resistance and Genetic Structure Analysis of Rice Germplasm in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 625-640.
[6] BIAN NengFei, SUN DongLei, GONG JiaLi, WANG Xing, XING XingHua, JIN XiaHong, WANG XiaoJun. Evaluation of Edible Quality of Roasted Peanuts and Indexes Screening [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 641-652.
[7] LI Long, LI ChaoNan, MAO XinGuo, WANG JingYi, JING RuiLian. Advances and Perspectives of Approaches to Phenotyping Crop Root System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 425-437.
[8] SHEN Qian,ZHANG SiPing,LIU RuiHua,LIU ShaoDong,CHEN Jing,GE ChangWei,MA HuiJuan,ZHAO XinHua,YANG GuoZheng,SONG MeiZhen,PANG ChaoYou. Construction of A Comprehensive Evaluation System and Screening of Cold Tolerance Indicators for Cold Tolerance of Cotton at Seedling Emergence Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355.
[9] HU Xin, ZHANG ZhiLiang, ZHANG Fei, DENG Bo, FANG WeiMin. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Large-Flowered Tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051.
[10] WeiLi ZHANG,H KOLBE,RenLian ZHANG,DingXiang ZHANG,ZhanGuo BAI,Jing ZHANG,HuaDing SHI. Overview of Soil Survey Works in Main Countries of World [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3565-3583.
[11] Yue GE,DeQuan ZHANG,ShaoBo LI,Li CHEN,XiaoChun ZHENG,Ce LIANG,TongJing YAN,JinHuo LI,ZhenYu WANG. Eating Quality Evaluation of Lamb in Different Postmortem Phases Based on Consumers’ Sensory Preferences [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3640-3651.
[12] SHEN ZhiJun, TIAN Yu, CAI ZhiXiang, XU ZiYuan, YAN Juan, SUN Meng, MA RuiJuan, YU MingLiang. Evaluation of Brown Rot Resistance in Peach Based on Genetic Resources Conserved in National Germplasm Repository of Peach in Nanjing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 3018-3028.
[13] TAN FengLing,ZHAN Ping,WANG Peng,TIAN HongLei. Effects of Thermal Sterilization on Aroma Quality of Flat Peach Juice Based on Sensory Evaluation and GC-MS Combined with OPLS-DA [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2425-2435.
[14] XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[15] FAN WenJing,LIU Ming,ZHAO Peng,ZHANG QiangQiang,WU DeXiang,GUO PengYu,ZHU XiaoYa,JIN Rong,ZHANG AiJun,TANG ZhongHou. Screening of Sweetpotato Varieties Tolerant to Low Nitrogen at Seedling Stage and Evaluation of Different Nitrogen Efficiencies [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 1891-1902.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!