Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (19): 3743-3757.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.19.003

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Production Potential of Main Sugarcane Varieties Under Different Planting Modes in Hilly and Mountainous Areas

ZHAO Yong1,2(), AI Jing1,2, WANG YuTong1,2, ZHANG ZhongFu1,2, YANG HongQi3, LI JiaQun4, GUO ZhaoJian3, LIU HaiJun4, QIN Wei1,2, DENG Jun1,2(), ZHANG YueBin1,2()   

  1. 1 National Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Biological Breeding, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650000
    2 Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661699, Yunnan
    3 Dehong Sugarcane Science Research Institute, Longchuan 678707, Yunnan
    4 Menghai County Sugarcane Technology Promotion Station, Menghai 666200, Yunnan
  • Received:2024-04-27 Accepted:2024-06-21 Online:2024-10-01 Published:2024-10-09
  • Contact: DENG Jun, ZHANG YueBin

RichHTML

14

PDF

836

Abstract:

【Objective】The research focused on the production potential of sugarcane main varieties under the different planting modes in mountainous and hilly regions, in order to explore the relationship between the varieties and mechanical adaptation, screen the adaptable varieties for mechanical production, and clarify the main characteristics of the varieties, thus to provide the theory for promoting the completely mechanical production of sugarcane in mountainous and hilly regions.【Method】Two different ecological types of sugarcane production regions in mountainous regions of Yunnan were selected to study the production potential of four main planting varieties, including LC05-136, YZ05-49, YZ05-51, and YZ08-1609, under two different planting modes (the completely mechanical or manual production).【Result】The yield and sucrose content of sugarcane varied between the two factors of varieties and planting modes, and the yield was significantly affected. Under the mechanical production, the yield of YZ08-1609 was significantly higher than that with the treatment of artificial production (P<0.01), while YZ05-51 showed the opposite trend (P<0.01), under the mechanical production, the sucrose content of YZ08-1609 is slightly higher than that with the artificial production (P>0.05), while these of LC05-136 and YZ05-49 were slightly decreased (P>0.05). The planting density and the emergence rate of sugarcane varied with both varieties and production modes. The planting density under the machinery production was generally higher than that under the artificial production, while the emergence rate was generally lower than that with the treatment of the artificial production. The emergence rate of YZ05-51 under the machinery production significantly decreased (P<0.05), while the emergence rate of YZ08-1609 remained relatively stable (P>0.05). The main agronomic traits of sugarcanes varied with both varieties and the production modes. The millable stalks of YZ08-1609 under the machinery production were significantly higher than that under the artificial production (P<0.05); the industrial characteristics were mainly influenced by the variety. YZ08-1609 owned higher growth potential under the machinery production, with significantly higher yield and millable stalks compared with these under the artificial production, and slightly higher sucrose content; YZ05-51 owned higher growth potential under the artificial production with the performance of higher yield under the artificial production. 【Conclusion】Different sugarcane varieties owned the different adaptabilities to the machinery production, like some sugarcane varieties were suitable for the machinery production and some were suitable for the manual production. During pushing forward the progress of the application of mechanical production in sugarcane planting, the adaptability of varieties should be fully considered. Overall, sugarcane varieties suitable for the machinery production should own higher sugarcane yield and more millable stalks, and the sucrose content should be less affected or even slightly higher than that under the manual production.

Key words: sugarcane, mechanized planting, manual planting, yield, sucrose, millable stalks

Fig. 1

Main meteorological characteristics of test sites from 2000 to 2020"

Fig. 2

Difference analysis of yield and sucrose content on new planting varieties under different cropping pattern a, b represented the differences in yield of new planting sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively; c, d represented the difference in sucrose content between new planting sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. ns: No significant difference between different treatments (P>0.05), **: Extremely significant difference between different treatments (P<0.01). The same as below"

Fig. 3

Difference analysis of planting density and emergence rate on new planting sugarcane varieties under different cropping pattern a, b represented the differences analysis of planting density of sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. c, d represented the difference analysis of the emergence rate of sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. The different lowercase letters represented the differences between different varieties under manual planting system, while the different uppercase letters represented the differences between different varieties under mechanical planting system. *: Significant difference (P<0.05). The same as below"

Fig. 4

Difference analysis of main agronomic traits on new planting sugarcane under different cropping pattern a, d represented the differences of planting height of sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. b, e represented the differences of stem diameter of sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. c, f represented the differences of millable stalks of sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively"

Fig. 5

Difference analysis of main technological traits on new planting sugarcane varieties under different cropping pattern a, d represented the differences analysis of the juice extraction yield in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. b, e represented the difference analysis of gravity purity of sugarcane in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. c, f represented the difference analysis of sugarcane fiber in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively"

Fig. 6

Analysis of yield and emergence rate of sugarcane varieties on the first ratoon under different cropping pattern a, b represented the yield of varieties in first ratoon in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively. c, d represented the emergence rate of varieties in first ratoon in experimental sites of Longchuan and Menghai, respectively"

Fig. 7

Difference analysis of sugarcane root dry weight under different planting pattern and tiller numbers a-d: The root dry weight and growth performance of sugarcane varieties in the large growth period; e: The comparison of root dry weight and growth performance of four tiller stems and two tiller stems during the tillering stage"

Fig. 8

Difference analysis of main industrial and agronomy traits on variety YZ08-1609 under different cropping patterns"

Fig. 9

Analysis of the main characteristics of sugarcane varieties suitable for mechanical production and prediction on the correlation of different planting traits"

[1]
ZHAO Y, YU L X, AI J, ZHANG Z F, DENG J, ZHANG Y B. Climate variations in the low-latitude plateau contribute to different sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yields and sugar contents in China. Plants, 2023, 12(14): 2712.
[2]
贾笛迩, 高欣欣, 刘高源, 张顺生, 郭家文. 云南省丘陵山地甘蔗全程机械化发展的研究进展. 热带农业科学, 2022, 42(2): 115-120.
JIA D E, GAO X X, LIU G Y, ZHANG S S, GUO J W. Research progress in the development of sugarcane mechanization in the hilly and mountainous regions of Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2022, 42(2): 115-120. (in Chinese)
[3]
刘庆庭, 莫建霖, 区颖刚, 杨丹彤. 我国整秆与切段2种甘蔗收获方式发展历程与前景分析. 甘蔗糖业, 2013(6): 45-55.
LIU Q T, MO J L, OU Y G, YANG D T. Analysis on the development course and prospect of sugarcane whole stalk harvesting and billet harvesting technology in China. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2013(6): 45-55. (in Chinese)
[4]
胡朝晖. 浅析我国甘蔗生产全程机械化的困境与前景. 甘蔗糖业, 2020(3): 7-13.
HU Z H. Difficulties and prospects of sugarcane production mechanization in China. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2020(3): 7-13. (in Chinese)
[5]
梁阗, 罗亚伟, 游建华, 高轶静, 何为中, 谭宏伟, 周柳强, 刘丽敏, 刘红坚, 李涛. 不同机械种植模式对甘蔗产量及效益影响. 中国糖料, 2023, 45(2): 41-46.
LIANG T, LUO Y W, YOU J H, GAO Y J, HE W Z, TAN H W, ZHOU L Q, LIU L M, LIU H J, LI T. Effects of different mechanical planting patterns on sugarcane yield and benefits in sugarcane. Sugar Crops of China, 2023, 45(2): 41-46. (in Chinese)
[6]
杨洪岂, 郭兆建, 杨光琴, 陈寿宏, 晏祥玉, 杨梅, 康宁, 张永港. 2CZX-2型甘蔗种植机引进应用及综合配套措施. 中国糖料, 2017, 39(3): 30-32.
YANG H Q, GUO Z J, YANG G Q, CHEN S H, YAN X Y, YANG M, KANG N, ZHANG Y G. Introduction and application of CZX-2 sugarcane planter and integrated matching measures. Sugar Crops of China, 2017, 39(3): 30-32. (in Chinese)
[7]
陈建国, 张跃彬, 杨洪昌, 樊仙, 方志存, 李俊, 郭家文. 2CZX-2型甘蔗种植机在云南蔗区应用情况及经济效益分析. 甘蔗糖业, 2015(1): 57-60.
CHEN J G, ZHANG Y B, YANG H C, FAN X, FANG Z C, LI J, GUO J W. Application and economic analysis of the sugarcane planter 2CZX-2 in Yunnan sugarcane region. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2015(1): 57-60. (in Chinese)
[8]
ROSSI NETO J, DE SOUZA Z M, KÖLLN O T, CARVALHO J L N, FERREIRA D A, CASTIONI G A F, BARBOSA L C, DE CASTRO S G Q, BRAUNBECK O A, GARSIDE A L, FRANCO H C J. The arrangement and spacing of sugarcane planting influence root distribution and crop yield. BioEnergy Research, 2018, 11(2): 291-304.
[9]
RAJULA SHANTHY T, MUTHUSAMY G R. Wider row spacing in sugarcane: A socio-economic performance analysis. Sugar Tech, 2012, 14(2): 126-133.
[10]
GARSIDE A L, BELL M J, ROBOTHAM B G. Row spacing and planting density effects on the growth and yield of sugarcane: 2. Strategies for the adoption of controlled traffic. Crop and Pasture Science, 2009, 60(6): 544.
[11]
罗锡文. 我国甘蔗机械化发展状况分析. 农业机械, 2024(1): 40-41.
LUO X W. Analysis of sugarcane mechanization development in China. Farm Machinery, 2024(1): 40-41. (in Chinese)
[12]
张跃彬, 赵培方, 胡朝晖, 阙友雄. 近年我国甘蔗品种的育种成就与发展趋势. 中国糖料, 2024, 46(1): 87-92.
ZHANG Y B, ZHAO P F, HU Z H, QUE Y X. The recent achievements and development trends of sugarcane improvement in China. Sugar Crops of China, 2024, 46(1): 87-92. (in Chinese)
[13]
DESALEGN B, KEBEDE E, LEGESSE H, FITE T. Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement: Selecting variety, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and bioregulator as a first-line treatment. Heliyon, 2023, 9(4): e15520.
[14]
周一帆, 杨林生, 孟博, 战健, 邓燕. 中国甘蔗主产区产量差及影响因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11): 2377-2388. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.11.011.
ZHOU Y F, YANG L S, MENG B, ZHAN J, DENG Y. Analysis of yield gaps and limiting factors in China’s main sugarcane production areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2377-2388. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.11.011. (in Chinese)
[15]
区惠平, 周柳强, 黄金生, 朱晓晖, 曾艳, 彭嘉宇, 谢如林, 谭宏伟, 李忠宁, 沈小微, 刘昔辉. 基于甘蔗产量与土壤磷素平衡的磷肥施用量研究. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(13): 2818-2829. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.13.011.
OU H P, ZHOU L Q, HUANG J S, ZHU X H, ZENG Y, PENG J Y, XIE R L, TAN H W, LI Z N, SHEN X W, LIU X H. Research on phosphorus application rate based on sugarcane yield and phosphorus balance in soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2818-2829. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.13.011. (in Chinese)
[16]
VERMA A K, GARG P K, HARI PRASAD K S, DADHWAL V K. Variety-specific sugarcane yield simulations and climate change impacts on sugarcane yield using DSSAT-CSM-CANEGRO model. Agricultural Water Management, 2023, 275: 108034.
[17]
李文凤, 范源洪, 陈学宽, 夏红明, 李复琴, 王炎炎. 甘蔗糖分的快速测定方法. 中国糖料, 2009, 31(2): 14-15.
LI W F, FAN Y H, CHEN X K, XIA H M, LI F Q, WANG Y Y. Rapid determination method of cane sugar content. Sugar Crops of China, 2009, 31(2): 14-15. (in Chinese)
[18]
熊焰, 王辉, 王军, 王露露, 周霞, 王健华, 伍苏然. 苗期机械损伤对甘蔗生长及产量的影响. 南方农业, 2022, 16(23): 25-28.
XIONG Y, WANG H, WANG J, WANG L L, ZHOU X, WANG J H, WU S R. Effects of mechanical damage at seedling stage on growth and yield of sugarcane. South China Agriculture, 2022, 16(23): 25-28. (in Chinese)
[19]
农蓓, 欧丽萍, 梁永游, 黄子轩, 黄振文, 农继胜, 黄大勇, 黄国恩. 百色甘蔗生产机械化与人工种植效益对比试验. 广西糖业, 2019(3): 60-62.
NONG B, OU L P, LIANG Y Y, HUANG Z X, HUANG Z W, NONG J S, HUANG D Y, HUANG G E. The benefit contrast test between sugarcane mechanized and artificial production in Baise. Guangxi Sugar Industry, 2019(3): 60-62. (in Chinese)
[20]
LI Z, LI S Y, LIN Z L, ZHANG H. Effects of mechanical differences in sugarcane on the quality of mechanical harvesting. International Agrophysics, 2023, 37(1): 27-40.
[21]
郭保卫, 唐闯, 王岩, 蔡嘉鑫, 唐健, 周苗, 景秀, 张洪程, 许轲, 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 李国辉, 陈恒. 两种机械化种植方式对优质晚籼稻产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 3910-3925. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.20.004.
GUO B W, TANG C, WANG Y, CAI J X, TANG J, ZHOU M, JING X, ZHANG H C, XU K, HU Y J, XING Z P, LI G H, CHEN H. Effects of two mechanical planting methods on the yield and quality of high-quality late indica rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 3910-3925. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.20.004. (in Chinese)
[22]
韩超, 许方甫, 卞金龙, 徐栋, 裘实, 赵晨, 朱盈, 刘国栋, 张洪程, 魏海燕. 淮北地区机械化种植方式对不同生育类型优质食味粳稻产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11): 1681-1693.

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01681
HAN C, XU F F, BIAN J L, XU D, QIU S, ZHAO C, ZHU Y, LIU G D, ZHANG H C, WEI H Y. Effects of mechanical planting methods on the yield and quality of Japonica rice with good taste and different growth tdurations in Huaibei Region. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(11): 1681-1693. (in Chinese)
[23]
吴立强, 王省芬, 张艳, 柯会锋, 刘素娟, 李志坤, 徐东永, 杨君, 孙正文, 谷淇深, 陈斌, 王红这, 卢怀玉, 张桂寅, 马峙英. 棉花早熟高产优质抗逆适于机械化新品种创新应用. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(6): 1-9.

doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.06.01
WU L Q, WANG X F, ZHANG Y, KE H F, LIU S J, LI Z K, XU D Y, YANG J, SUN Z W, GU Q S, CHEN B, WANG H Z, LU H Y, ZHANG G Y, MA Z Y. Creation and application of new cotton varieties with early maturity, high yield, good fibre quality, high adversity resistance and suitability for mechanization. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(6): 1-9. (in Chinese)
[24]
方志存, 高欣欣, 李美蓉, 邹俊云, 武彩英, 旗尔, 郭家文. 不同种植方式对甘蔗农艺性状及产量的影响. 中国糖料, 2016, 38(6): 13-14.
FANG Z C, GAO X X, LI M R, ZOU J Y, WU C Y, QI E, GUO J W. Impacts of different planting methods on agronomic characters and yield of sugarcane. Sugar Crops of China, 2016, 38(6): 13-14. (in Chinese)
[25]
于海杰, 黄严, 陈超君, 梁和, 李朝, 陈昌君, 韦承坤. 机械种植对甘蔗产量、蔗糖分及抗旱性的影响. 广西职业技术学院学报, 2016, 9(2): 6-11.
YU H J, HUANG Y, CHEN C J, LIANG H, LI C, CHEN C J, WEI C K. Influence of mechanical planting on sugarcane yield, sugar content and drought resistance. Journal of Guangxi Vocational and Technical College, 2016, 9(2): 6-11. (in Chinese)
[26]
谭秦亮, 周全光, 朱鹏锦, 庞新华, 欧克纬, 李穆, 程琴. 甘蔗机械化种植对不同品种农艺性状及产量的影响. 农业研究与应用, 2017(6): 1-6.
TAN Q L, ZHOU Q G, ZHU P J, PANG X H, OU K W, LI M, CHENG Q. Impacts of mechanized planting on agronomic traits and yield of different sugarcane varieties. Agricultural Research and Application, 2017(6): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[27]
罗艺. 不同种植方式和不同行距对甘蔗生长效应的研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2014.
LUO Y. The growth effect of sugarcane with different planting patterns and row width[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[28]
CHRISTINA M, JONES M R, VERSINI A, MÉZINO M, LE MÉZO L, AUZOUX S, SOULIÉ J C, POSER C, GÉRARDEAUX E. Impact of climate variability and extreme rainfall events on sugarcane yield gap in a tropical Island. Field Crops Research, 2021, 274: 108326.
[29]
罗俊, 许莉萍, 邱军, 张华, 袁照年, 邓祖湖, 陈如凯, 阙友雄. 基于HA-GGE双标图的甘蔗试验环境评价及品种生态区划分. 作物学报, 2015, 41(2): 214-227.
LUO J, XU L P, QIU J, ZHANG H, YUAN Z N, DENG Z H, CHEN R K, QUE Y X. Evaluation of sugarcane test environments and ecological zone division in China based on HA-GGE biplot. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(2): 214-227. (in Chinese)
[30]
QUE Y X, WU Q B, ZHANG H, LUO J, ZHANG Y B. Developing new sugarcane varieties suitable for mechanized production in China: Principles, strategies and prospects. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 14: 1337144.
[31]
王臻, 周芳, 杨远霄, 周婷, 刘红艳. 我国芝麻适宜机械化种植与收获的关键农艺性状研究进展. 中国种业, 2024(1): 22-31.
WANG Z, ZHOU F, YANG Y X, ZHOU T, LIU H Y. Research progress on key agronomic traits of sesame for mechanized planting and harvesting in China. China Seed Industry, 2024(1): 22-31. (in Chinese)
[32]
周娟, 王胜利, 杜召海, 陈煜, 张景霞, 宋章强, 张传云, 王芙蓉, 张军. 适宜轻简化机械化植棉的鲁棉378的选育及其栽培技术. 中国棉花, 2022, 49(2): 24-25.

doi: 10.11963/cc20210165
ZHOU J, WANG S L, DU Z H, CHEN Y, ZHANG J X, SONG Z Q, ZHANG C Y, WANG F R, ZHANG J. Breeding and cultivation techniques of Lumian 378 for simplified and mechanized cultivation. China Cotton, 2022, 49(2): 24-25. (in Chinese)
[33]
赵丽萍, 覃伟, 刘家勇. 甘蔗根系概论与研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
ZHAO L P, QIN W, LIU J Y. Introduction and Research on Sugarcane Root System. Beijing: Science Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
[34]
刘佳欣, 吴周周, 周婵婵, 阿娜, 李漪濛, 王术. 水稻倒伏性状与抗倒途径研究进展. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(6): 44-48, 55.

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.06.009
LIU J X, WU Z Z, ZHOU C C, A N, LI Y M, WANG S. Research progress of lodging characters and lodging resistance pathways in rice. China Rice, 2023, 29(6): 44-48, 55. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.06.009
[35]
覃伟, 杨昆, 赵丽萍, 赵勇, 张静, 吴才文, 赵培方, 刘家勇, 姚丽, 任生林, 毛钧, 陈建国, 赵俊. 干旱条件下甘蔗宿根性评价及其关键影响因子分析. 甘蔗糖业, 2023, 52(3): 22-27.
QIN W, YANG K, ZHAO L P, ZHAO Y, ZHANG J, WU C W, ZHAO P F, LIU J Y, YAO L, REN S L, MAO J, CHEN J G, ZHAO J. Evaluation analysis of sugarcane rooting and its key influencing factors under drought. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 2023, 52(3): 22-27. (in Chinese)
[1] PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2# and Changbai7# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2] WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[3] WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[4] ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[5] HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[6] HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[7] GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[8] YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[9] YANG Rui, CHEN JingDong, HUANG Ying, XIE LingLi, ZHANG XueKun, ZHOU DengWen, LIU QingYun, XU JinSong, XU BenBo. Genetic Improvement and Configuration Analysis of High-Yield Rapeseed Lines in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 250-264.
[10] CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[11] CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong, WU CunXiang. Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
[12] ZHANG ZhiYong, TAN ShiChao, XIONG ShuPing, MA XinMing, WEI YiHao, WANG XiaoChun. Effects of Annual Water and Nitrogen Optimization on Yield and Nitrogen Migration of Wheat-Maize Rotation System in Irrigation Area of Northern Henan [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 336-353.
[13] LÜ XuDong, SUN ShiYuan, LI YaNan, LIU YuLong, WANG YanQun, FU Xin, ZHANG JiaYing, NING Peng, PENG ZhengPing. Effects of Intelligent Mechanized Layered Fertilization on Root-Soil Nutrient Distribution and Yield in Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 129-146.
[14] LU Hao, ZHANG MingLong, HAN Mei, YAN QingBiao, LI ZhengPeng, YIN Wen, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang. Green Manure Returning via Sheep Digest with Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction are Beneficial to Improve Wheat Yield and Soil Quality at Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 147-160.
[15] YE MeiJin, CHEN JiaTing, ZHOU JieGuang, YIN Li, HU XinRong, LAN YuXin, CHEN Bin, SU LongXing, LIU JiaJun, LIU TianChao, LI XiaoYu, MA Jian. Identification, Validation and Genetic Effect Analysis of Major QTL for Spike Density in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 17-28.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd