基于参数化和非参数化法的棉花生物量高光谱遥感估算

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.20.005

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this experiment was to use hyperspectral remote sensing data to estimate cotton biomass quickly and non-destructively, and to assess the performance differences between parameterized and non-parametric algorithms on cotton. 【Method】This experiment was based on the dataset of four cotton varieties in two years (2004 and 2005), and the two-year data were modeled and verified respectively. The biomass estimation models in different periods (before and after boll opening) were built by utilizing parameterized algorithms, including vegetation index method and continuous wavelet transform, and non-parameterized algorithms, including partial least squares regression, random forest, artificial neural network, regression tree, bag tree and enhanced tree, support vector machine and Gaussian process regression, respectively. 【Result】Near-infrared and red edge bands were still the most effective bands in monitoring cotton biomass of remote sensing. The parameterized method was simple, efficient and accurate. Among the parametric methods, CI_{red edge} was proved to be the best vegetation index for cotton biomass estimation with high independent verification results (before boll opening: RMSE=27.23 g·m^-2; after boll opening: RMSE=48.81 g·m ^-2). The result based on continuous wavelet transform alleviated the underestimation phenomenon of vegetation index, especially after boll opening (before boll opening: RMSE=31.54 g·m ^-2; after boll opening: RMSE=37.57 g·m ^-2). Among the non-parametric methods, the random forest was the best algorithm for cotton biomass estimation (before boll opening: RMSE=20.48 g·m ^-2; after boll opening: RMSE=30.28 g·m ^-2). The estimation accuracy of the two types of algorithms was affected by cotton wool, and the estimation accuracy after boll opening was significantly lower than before boll opening. 【Conclusion】In this study, the cotton biomass estimation models based on parameterized and non-parameterized algorithms were evaluated, and it was proved that the non-parameterized algorithm had high inversion accuracy and could be used as an important method for non-destructive monitoring of cotton biomass.

Key words: biomass, hyperspectral, vegetation index, continuous wavelet, machine learning, cotton

ZHOU Meng,HAN XiaoXu,ZHENG HengBiao,CHENG Tao,TIAN YongChao,ZHU Yan,CAO WeiXing,YAO Xia. Remote Sensing Estimation of Cotton Biomass Based on Parametric and Nonparametric Methods by Using Hyperspectral Reflectance[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4299-4311.

Figures/Tables 12

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Table 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 5

Fig. 5

Table 6

Fig. 6

References 50

[1]	杨国正, 王德鹏, 聂以春, 张献龙. 钾肥用量对棉花生物量和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(5):905-911.
	YANG G Z, WANG D P, NIE Y C, ZHANG X L. Effect of potassium application rate on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) biomass and yield. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(5):905-911. (in Chinese)
[2]	赵春江. 农业遥感研究与应用进展. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(12):277-293.
	ZHAO C J. Advances of research and application in remote sensing for agriculture. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2014, 45(12):277-293. (in Chinese)
[3]	祁亚琴, 王登伟, 陈冠文, 黄春燕, 段震宇, 陈燕, 袁杰, 杨坤. 基于高光谱数据提取作物冠层特征信息的研究进展. 棉花学报, 2005, 17(6):371-375.
	QI Y Q, WANG D W, CHEN G W, HUANG C Y, DUAN Z Y, CHEN Y, YUAN J, YANG K. Research of crop canopy characteristic information by using hyperspectral remote sensing data. Cotton Science, 2005, 17(6):371-375. (in Chinese)
[4]	黄春燕, 王登伟, 曹连莆, 张煜星, 任丽彤, 程诚. 棉花地上鲜生物量的高光谱估算模型研究. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(3):131-135.
	HUANG C Y, WANG D W, CAO L P, ZHANG Y X, REN L T, CHENG C. Models for estimating cotton aboveground fresh biomass using hyperspectral data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(3):131-135. (in Chinese)
[5]	安海波, 李斐, 赵萌莉, 刘亚俊. 基于优化光谱指数的牧草生物量估算. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2015, 35(11):3155-3160.
	AN H B, LI F, ZHAO M L, LIU Y J. Optimized spectral indices based estimation of forage grass biomass. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2015, 35(11):3155-3160. (in Chinese)
[6]	CHENG T, SONG R Z, LI D, ZHOU K, ZHENG H B, YAO X, TIAN Y C, CAO W X, ZHU Y. Spectroscopic estimation of biomass in canopy components of paddy rice using dry matter and chlorophyll indices. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(4):319-333. doi: 10.3390/rs9040319
[7]	TIAN Y C, YAO X, YANG J, CAO W X, HANNAWAY D B, ZHU Y. Assessing newly developed and published vegetation indices for estimating rice leaf nitrogen concentration with ground- and space-based hyperspectral reflectance. Field Crops Research, 2011, 120(2):299-310. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.002
[8]	ZHU Y, TIAN Y C, YAO X, LIU X J, CAO W X. Analysis of common canopy reflectance spectra for indicating leaf nitrogen concentrations in wheat and rice. Plant Production Science, 2007, 10(4):400-411. doi: 10.1626/pps.10.400
[9]	CHENG T, RIVARD B, SÁNCHEZ-AZOFEIFA A G, FÉRET J B, JACQUEMOUD S, USTIN S L. Deriving leaf mass per area (LMA) from foliar reflectance across a variety of plant species using continuous wavelet analysis. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 87:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.10.009
[10]	CHENG T, RIVARD B, SÁNCHEZ-AZOFEIFA A. Spectroscopic determination of leaf water content using continuous wavelet analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 115(2):659-670. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.001
[11]	KOGER C H, BRUCE L M, SHAW D R, REDDY K N. Wavelet analysis of hyperspectral reflectance data for detecting pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) in soybean (Glycine max). Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 86(1):108-119. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00071-3
[12]	YAO X, SI H Y, CHENG T, JIA M, CHEN Q, TIAN Y C, ZHU Y, CAO W X, CHEN C Y, CAI J Y. Hyperspectral estimation of canopy leaf biomass phenotype per ground area using a continuous wavelet analysis in wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9:1360. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01360
[13]	李旭青, 刘湘南, 刘美玲, 吴伶. 水稻冠层氮素含量光谱反演的随机森林算法及区域应用. 遥感学报, 2014, 18(4):923-945.
	LI X Q, LIU X N, LIU M L, WU L. Random forest algorithm and regional applications of spectral inversion model for estimating canopy nitrogen concentration in rice. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2014, 18(4):923-945. (in Chinese)
[14]	张春兰, 杨贵军, 李贺丽, 汤伏全, 刘畅, 张丽妍. 基于随机森林算法的冬小麦叶面积指数遥感反演研究. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(5):855-867.
	ZHANG C L, YANG G J, LI H L, TANG F Q, LIU C, ZHANG L Y. Remote sensing inversion of leaf area index of winter wheat based on random forest algorithm. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5):855-867. (in Chinese)
[15]	王念一, 于丰华, 许童羽, 杜文, 郭忠辉, 张国圣. 基于机器学习的粳稻叶片叶绿素含量高光谱反演建模. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(2):359-366.
	WANG N Y, YU F H, XU T Y, DU W, GUO Z H, ZHANG G S. Hyperspectral retrieval modelling for chlorophyll contents of japonica-rice leaves based on machine learning. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(2):359-366. (in Chinese)
[16]	陶惠林, 冯海宽, 杨贵军, 杨小冬, 苗梦珂, 吴智超, 翟丽婷. 基于无人机数码影像和高光谱数据的冬小麦产量估算对比. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(23):111-118.
	TAO H L, FENG H K, YANG G J, YANG X D, MIAO M K, WU Z C, ZHAI L T. Comparison of winter wheat yields estimated with UAV digital image and hyperspectral data. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(23):111-118. (in Chinese)
[17]	王大成, 王纪华, 靳宁, 王芊, 李存军, 黄敬峰, 王渊, 黄芳. 用神经网络和高光谱植被指数估算小麦生物量. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(S2):196-201.
	WANG D C, WANG J H, JIN N, WANG Q, LI C J, HUANG J F, WANG Y, HUANG F. ANN-based wheat biomass estimation using canopy hyperspectral vegetation indices. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(S2):196-201. (in Chinese)
[18]	吕杰, 汪康宁, 李崇贵, 史晓亮. 基于高光谱遥感的玉米叶绿素含量估测模型. 中国矿业大学学报, 2016, 45(2):405-410.
	LÜ J, WANG K N, LI C G, SHI X L. Estimation models of corn chlorophyll content based on proximal hyperspectral remote sensing. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2016, 45(2):405-410. (in Chinese)
[19]	QI X M, ZHANG L D, DU X L, SONG Z J, XU S Y. Quantitative analysis using NIR by building PLS-BP model. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2003, 23(5):870-872.
[20]	YANG X H, HUANG J F, WU Y P, WANG J W, WANG P, WANG X M, HUETE A R. Estimating biophysical parameters of rice with remote sensing data using support vector machines. Science China Life Sciences, 2011, 54(3):272-281. doi: 10.1007/s11427-011-4135-4
[21]	唐普恩, 丁建丽, 葛翔宇, 张振华. 基于Sentinel-2A 影像干旱区棉花叶片 SPAD 数字制图. 生态学报, 2020, 40(22):8326-8335.
	TANG P E, DING J L, GE X Y, ZHANG Z H. SPAD digital mapping of cotton leaves in arid area based on Sentinel-2A image. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(22):8326-8335. (in Chinese)
[22]	陈硕博. 无人机多光谱遥感反演棉花光合参数与水分的模型研究[D]. 陕西: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
	CHEN S B. Modeling of cotton photosynthetic parameters and water content retrieval by multi-spectral remote sensing of UAV[D]. Shaanxi: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[23]	顾生浩. 棉花功能结构模型建立与新疆棉花产量预测[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018.
	GU S H. A functional-structural model of cotton and prediction of cotton yield in Xinjiang[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[24]	马岩川. 基于高光谱遥感的棉花冠层水氮参数估算[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020.
	MA Y C. Estimation of water and nitrogen parameters of cotton at canopy scale based on hyperspectral remote sensing[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2020. (in Chinese)
[25]	VERRELST J, RIVERA J P, VEROUSTRAETE F, MUNOZ-MARI J, CLEVERS J G P W, CAMPS-VALLS G, MORENO J. Experimental Sentinel-2 LAI estimation using parametric, non-parametric and physical retrieval methods-A comparison. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2015, 108:260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.04.013
[26]	BUSCHMANN C, NAGEL E. In vivo spectroscopy and internal optics of leaves as basis for remote sensing of vegetation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(4):711-722. doi: 10.1080/01431169308904370
[27]	JORDAN C F. Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor. Ecology, 1969, 50(4):663-666. doi: 10.2307/1936256
[28]	PENUELAS J, GAMON J A, FREDEEN A L, MERINO J, FIELD C B. Reflectance indices associated with physiological changes in nitrogen- and water-limited sunflower leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1994, 48(2):135-146. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(94)90136-8
[29]	BARNES J D, BALAGUER L, MANRIQUE E, ELVIRA S, DAVISON A W. A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls A and B in lichens and higher plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 1992, 32(2):85-100. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(92)90034-Y
[30]	DASH J, CURRAN P J. Evaluation of the MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 25(23):5403-5413. doi: 10.1080/0143116042000274015
[31]	DATT B. Visible/near infrared reflectance and chlorophyll content in Eucalyptus leaves. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2010, 20(14):2741-2759. doi: 10.1080/014311699211778
[32]	GITELSON A A, GRITZ Y R, MERZLYAK M N. Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2003, 160(3):271-282. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00887
[33]	MA B L, MORRISON M J, DWYER L M. Canopy light reflectance and field greenness to assess nitrogen fertilization and yield of maize. Agronomy Journal, 1996, 88(6):915-920. doi: 10.2134/agronj1996.00021962003600060011x
[34]	GITELSON A A, KAUFMAN Y J, MERZLYAK M N. Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 58(3):289-298. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00072-7
[35]	HUETE A, DIDAN K, MIURA T, RODRIGUEZ E P, GAO X, FERREIRA L G. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 83(1):195-213. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2
[36]	RONDEAUX G, STEVEN M, BARET F. Optimization of soil- adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 55(2):95-107. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00186-7
[37]	GAMON J A, PEÑUELAS J, FIELD C B. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992, 41(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(92)90059-S
[38]	BROGE N H, LEBLANC E. Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 76(2):156-172. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00197-8
[39]	KOWALSKI B R, GELADI P. Partial least-squares regression: A tutorial. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1986, 185(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-9
[40]	BALAGUER L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45:5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
[41]	FARIFTEH J, MEER F V D, ATZBERGER C, CARRANZA E J M. Quantitative analysis of salt-affected soil reflectance spectra: A comparison of two adaptive methods (PLSR and ANN). Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 110(1):59-78. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.005
[42]	BREIMAN L I, FRIEDMAN J H, OLSHEN R A, STONE C J. Classification and regression trees. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 2015, 57(3):582-588.
[43]	BREIMAN L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 1996, 24(2):123-140.
[44]	FRIEDMAN J, HASTIE T, TIBSHIRANI R. Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting. The Annals of Statistics, 2000, 28(2):337-407.
[45]	RASMUSSEN C E, WILLIAMS C K L. Gaussian processes for machine learning [M]. New York: MIT Press, 2006.
[46]	ZHENG H B, CHENG T, ZHOU M, LI D, YAO X, TIAN Y C, CAO W X, ZHU Y. Improved estimation of rice aboveground biomass combining textural and spectral analysis of UAV imagery. Precision Agriculture, 2019, 20(3):611-629. doi: 10.1007/s11119-018-9600-7
[47]	GITELSON A A, ANDRÉS V, ARKEBAUER T J, RUNDQUIST D C, GALINA K, BRYAN L. Remote estimation of leaf area index and green leaf biomass in maize canopies. Geophysical Research Letters, 2003, 30(5):335-343.
[48]	WANG H F, HUO Z G, ZHOU G S, LIAO Q H, FENG H K, WU L. Estimating leaf SPAD values of freeze-damaged winter wheat using continuous wavelet analysis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 98:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.10.032
[49]	LI D, TIAN L, WAN Z F, JIA M, CHENG T. Assessment of unified models for estimating leaf chlorophyll content across directional- hemispherical reflectance and bidirectional reflectance spectra. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 231:111240. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111240
[50]	ASNER G P. Biophysical and biochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 64(3):234-253. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00014-5

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

试验 Experiment	样点数 Number of samples	生物量Biomass (g·m^-2)
试验 Experiment	样点数 Number of samples	最低值Min	平均值Mean	最大值Max
试验1 Experiment 1	100	14.4	50.9	140.9
试验2 Experiment 2	80	20.0	95.5	155.2

植被指数 Vegetation index	名称 Name	公式 Formula	文献 Reference
DI	差值指数 Difference index	R₈₀₀ -R₅₅₀	[26]
DVI	差值植被指数 Difference vegetation index	R₈₀₀ -R₆₈₀	[27]
RVI	比值植被指数 Ratio vegetation index	R₇₈₇/R₇₆₅	[5]
SRPI	简单比值色素指数 Simple ratio pigment index	R₄₃₀ /R₆₈₀	[28]
NPCI	叶绿素归一化植被指数 Chlorophyll normalized vegetation index	(R₆₈₀-R₄₃₀)/(R₆₈₀+R₄₃₀)	[29]
MTCI	中分辨率陆地叶绿素成像指数 MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index	(R₇₅₀-R₇₁₀)/(R₇₁₀-R₆₈₀)	[30]
DATT	DATT	(R₈₀₀-R₇₂₀)/( R₈₀₀ -R₆₈₀)	[31]
CI_{red edge}	红边叶绿素指数 Red edge chlorophyll index	(R₈₀₀ /R₇₂₀)- 1	[32]
NDVI	归一化植被指数 Normalized vegetation index	(R₇₈₀-R₆₇₀)/(R₇₈₀-R₆₇₀)	[33]
GNDVI	绿色归一化植被指数 Green normalized vegetation index	(R₈₀₁-R₅₅₀)/(R₈₀₀+R₅₅₀)	[34]
EVI	增强型植被指数 Enhanced vegetation index	2.5×(R_NIR /R_RED )/(R_NIR+6.0×R_RED-7.5×R_BLUE+1)	[35]
OSAVI	优化土壤调整植被指数 Optimized soil-adjusted vegetation index	1.16×(R_NIR-R_RED)/(R_NIR+R_RED+0.16)	[36]
PRI	光化学植被指数 Physiological reflectance index	(R₅₃₁-R₅₇₀)/(R₅₃₀+R₅₇₀)	[37]
TVI	三角形植被指数 Triangle vegetation index	0.5×[120×(R₇₅₀-R₅₅₀)-200×(R₆₇₀-R₅₅₀)]	[38]

算法 Algorithms	核心算法 Core algorithm	文献 Reference
PLSR	Matrix inversion	[39]
RF	Bootstraping	[40]
ANN	Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm	[41]
RT	Sorting & grouping	[42]
BaT	Bootstrap aggregation (bagging) + RT	[43]
BoT	Least squares boosting + RT	[44]
SVM	Bayesian statistical inference	[20]
GPR	Bayesian statistical inference	[45]

植被指数 Vegetation index	相关系数 Correlation coefficient		植被指数 Vegetation index	相关系数 Correlation coefficient
植被指数 Vegetation index	吐絮前 Before boll opening	吐絮后 After boll opening	植被指数 Vegetation index	吐絮前 Before boll opening	吐絮后 After boll opening
GNDVI	0.67**	0.55**	PRI	0.23**	0.28*
DATT	0.63**	0.55**	RVI	0.26**	0.03
CI_{red edge}	0.59**	0.53**	EVI	0.15**	0.30**
MTCI	0.56**	0.50**	OSAVI	0.18**	0.33**
SRPI	0.34**	0.43**	DI	0.13**	0.16**
NPCI	-0.34**	-0.42**	DVI	0.07	0.14*
NDVI	0.29**	0.36**	TVI	0.04	0.10*

时期 Stage	波段 Band (nm)	尺度 Scale	模型 model	决定系数 Coefficient of determination (R²)	验证 Validation
时期 Stage	波段 Band (nm)	尺度 Scale	模型 model	决定系数 Coefficient of determination (R²)	R²	RMSE (g·m^-2)
吐絮前 Before boll opening	1202	3	y = 11.96e^-197.80x	0.41**	0.57	38.43
	1209	4	y = 11.11e^-68.73x	0.48**	0.63	31.54
	720	5	y = 60.34e^-3.52x	0.58**	0.59	34.56
	722	6	y=44.45e^-4.19x	0.59**	0.58	36.47
吐絮后 After boll opening	1202	3	y = 8.63e^-259.6x	0.40**	0.50	36.49
	1209	4	y = 9.40e^-78.69x	0.40**	0.48	37.57
	720	5	y = 78.25e^-3.49x	0.46**	0.55	48.41
	722	6	y=53.43e^-4.80x	0.55**	0.54	39.50

Remote Sensing Estimation of Cotton Biomass Based on Parametric and Nonparametric Methods by Using Hyperspectral Reflectance

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 50

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

方法 Methods	吐絮前Before boll opening				吐絮后After boll opening
	建模集Modeling		预测集Predicting		建模集Modeling		预测集Predicting
	R²	RMSE (g·m^-2)	R²	RMSE(g·m^-2)	R²	RMSE (g·m^-2)	R²	RMSE (g·m^-2)
RF	0.76	11.14	0.53	20.48	0.57	16.43	0.65	30.28
SVM	0.84	7.47	0.44	33.55	0.67	14.61	0.54	44.25
GPR	0.85	7.28	0.38	29.16	0.38	19.49	0.39	53.84
BaT	0.72	9.30	0.24	39.92	0.41	17.89	0.35	51.61
BoT	0.96	3.56	0.22	39.71	0.91	7.73	0.36	51.38
RT	0.94	5.06	0.30	40.99	0.90	9.32	0.42	54.53
PLSR	0.43	15.91	0.13	30.28	0.35	23.79	0.19	30.59
ANN	0.83	9.76	0.57	38.09	0.69	23.41	0.42	51.99

[1]	LI YuanJing, YUAN RuiXiang, LI YongTai, SUN TianGe, LIU Feng, LI YanJun, ZHANG XinYu. Identification and Functional Characterization of β-Glucosidase Genes in Verticillium dahliae for Pathogenicity on Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1380-1399.
[2]	QIAN Jin, LI YingXue, WU Fang, ZOU XiaoChen. Improved Leaf Phosphorus Content Estimation of Winter Wheat Using Ensemble Hyperspectral Dimensionality Reduction Method [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 781-792.
[3]	WEN YuBin, BAI ShanShan, CAI ZeJiang, SUN Nan, XU MingGang. Effects of Organic Materials on Soil Microbial Biomass and Its Acidity Regulation Mechanism [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 834-849.
[4]	YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[5]	FEI YaoYing, WANG Di, TANG WeiJie, GUO CaiLi, ZHANG XiaoHu, QIU XiaoLei, CHENG Tao, YAO Xia, JIANG ChongYa, ZHU Yan, CAO WeiXing, ZHENG HengBiao. Estimation of Rice Grain Protein Content Using Fusion Imagery from UAV-based Multi-Sensors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 41-56.
[6]	WANG AiDong, LI RuiJie, FENG XiangQian, HONG WeiYuan, LI ZiQiu, ZHANG XiaoGuo, WANG DanYing, CHEN Song. Multi-Angle Imaging and Machine Learning Approaches for Accurate Rice Leaf Area Estimation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1719-1734.
[7]	GUO ChenLi, LIU Yang, CHEN Yan, HU Wei, WANG YouHua, ZHOU ZhiGuo, ZHAO WenQing. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Postpone Under Nitrogen Reduction Condition on Yield, Phosphorus Fertilizer Utilization Efficiency of Drip-Irrigated Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1749-1766.
[8]	WANG WeiMeng, WEI YunXiao, TANG YunNi, LIU MiaoMiao, CHEN QuanJia, DENG XiaoJuan, ZHANG Rui. Establishment and Rooting Optimization of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Transformation System in Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1479-1493.
[9]	ZHAO YuXuan, MIAO JiYuan, HU Wei, ZHOU ZhiGuo. Effects of Low Temperature at Seedling Stage on Cotton Floral Bud Differentiation and Cotton Plant Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1311-1320.
[10]	TIAN LiWen, LOU ShanWei, ZHANG PengZhong, DU MingWei, LUO HongHai, LI Jie, PAHATI MaiMaiTi, MA TengFei, ZHANG LiZhen. Analysis of Problems and Pathways for Increasing Cotton Yield per Unit Area in Xinjiang Under Green and Efficient Production Mode [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1102-1115.
[11]	WU WenQi, JIAO Yang, XI JiaZhen, WANG XuFeng, GUO BoSen, SHEN YuFang. Effects of Different Organic Materials Combined with Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Fertility and Maize Grain Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4966-4978.
[12]	WANG LiYuan, WANG Hui, WANG MuMu, WANG DongJian, LI RuYu, ZHENG YongSheng, ZHANG Han. Construction and Application of DNA Fingerprint Database for Known Varieties in Upland Cotton DUS Testing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4570-4588.
[13]	HUANG HongMei, WANG SiQi, YANG QingChuan, GUO ChangHong, WANG Xue. Phosphate Transporter MsPT5 Regulates Phosphate Uptake and Utilization in Alfalfa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4544-4556.
[14]	CAO ShiLiang, ZHANG JianGuo, YU Tao, YANG GengBin, LI WenYue, MA XueNa, SUN YanJie, HAN WeiBo, TANG Gui, SHAN DaPeng. Heterosis Groups Research in Maize Inbred Lines Based on Machine Learning [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 203-213.
[15]	LIU Jing, WANG Hong, ZHANG Lei, XIAO JiuJun, WU JianGao, GONG MingChong. Inversion of Nitrogen Content in Chili Pepper Leaves Based on Hyperspectral Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 252-265.