Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 1657-1669.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.09.001

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS •     Next Articles

Identification of Wheat Key Autophagy-Related Factor ATG18 and Profiling of Their Expression Under Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

 SUN  Hong, ZHANG  Wei, WEI  Xiao-Jing, WANG  Hua-Zhong   

  1. School of Life Sciences, Tianjin Normal University/Tianjin Key Laboratory of Animals and Plants Resistance, Tianjin 300387
  • Received:2013-11-22 Online:2014-05-01 Published:2014-01-27

Abstract: 【Objective】 One objective of this study is to identify wheat homologues of autophagy-related gene ATG18, to analyze the sequence characteristics and 3-D structures of their encoding proteins. The other objective is to profile their expression patterns under biotic and abiotic stresses and under phytohormone applications, thus laying a foundation for elucidating their biological functions. 【Method】 EST assembly and RT-PCR were carried out to clone ATG18 cDNA sequences from RNA pool generated from the powdery mildew (Pm) causal fungus Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici (Bgt)-challenged wheat leaves. Bioinformatics tools were employed to analyze gene exon-intron models, to predict protein domains, conserved amino acids and 3-D structures and to analyze the phylogenetic relationships among plant orthologues. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR was used to investigate gene expression patterns in responses to Bgt infection, treatments of various phytohormones or exposure to conditions of high salinity, drought, low temperature and darkness or nitrogen deficiency. 【Result】 Four members (TaATG18a, 18b, 18c and 18d) of the wheat ATG18 family were identified in this study. They are of great similarity and each has an ORF of 1 158 bp encoding a protein of 385 amino acids. The deduced protein sequences of TaATG18s consist of two classic WD-40 domains, one phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P) binding motif and the conserved amino acids at the ATG2-binding site. The four TaATG18s all have two kinds of alternatively spliced mRNA isoforms, respectively encoding the complete functional protein form and the N-terminal truncated non-functional form missing the WD-40 domain and the conserved functional residues. TaATG18a was predicted to fold into a six-blade β-propeller-like structure similar to other WD-40 proteins. The PI3P binding motif is located at the strand 4 of blade 5 and the loop connecting blades 5 and 6, and the ATG2 binding site is located at the loop connecting blades 2 and 3. Expression of TaATG18s can be upregulated by biotic stress of Bgt infection, however, the detailed regulation patterns by Bgt infection differed between wheat-Bgt compatible and incompatible reactions. In the two incompatible reactions triggered by the broad-spectrum Pm resistance gene Pm21 and the isolate-specific Pm resistance gene Pm3f, two times of transcripts accumulation of TaATG18s were observed during 0-36 hours after inoculation of Bgt, which are closely related to the progression of Bgt infection. Although TaATG18s of the moderately susceptible line Yangmai 158 also showed a bimodal Bgt-induced expression profile, the first time of transcripts accumulation had a shorter duration and a lower peak than that observed in the incompatible reaction on Pm21-carrying Yangmai 158 isogenic line. Expression of TaATG18s of the highly susceptible line Chancellor fluctuated little in response to Bgt infection. Differences were also found between the resistant line and the susceptible line as to their TaATG18s expression responding to the same exogenously applied phytohormone salicylic acid (SA) or ethylene, which showed negative effects on the resistance line but positive effects on the susceptible line. Phytohormones regulated the expression of TaATG18s not only at the transcription level, but also at the process of mRNA splicing. Expression of TaATG18s can also be upregulated by abiotic stresses of high salinity, drought, low temperature and darkness or nitrogen deficiency. 【Conclusion】 Proteins encoded by TaATG18s identified here probably participate in the wheat autophagy process through their PI3P-mediated autophagic membrane localization and the formation of ATG18-ATG2 complex. TaATG18s and their involved autophagy are implicated in the wheat immune response to Bgt infection and in the wheat responses to various abiotic stresses. Different expression responses of TaATG18s to one kind of phytohormone SA or ethylene in the resistant and the susceptible lines may partially account for the different phenotype outcomes of Pm resistance or susceptibility.

Key words: wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) , autophagy , ATG18 , powdery mildew

[1]Liu Y, Bassham D C. Autophagy: Pathways for self-eating in plant cells. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63: 215-237.

[2]Yoshimoto K. Beginning to understand autophagy, an intracellular self-degradation system in plants. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2012, 53(8): 1355-1365.

[3]Klionsky D J, Abdalla F C, Abeliovich H, Abraham R T, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli K, Agholme L, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Aguirre-Ghiso J A, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy, 2012, 8(4): 445-544.

[4]Li F, Vierstra R D. Autophagy: A multifaceted intracellular system for bulk and selective recycling. Trends in Plant Science, 2012, 17(9): 526-537.

[5]Kim S H, Kwon C, Lee J H, Chung T. Genes for plant autophagy: Functions and interactions. Molecules and Cells, 2012, 34(5): 413-423.

[6]Tsukada M, Ohsumi Y. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Letters, 1993, 333(1/2): 169-174.

[7]王燕, 刘玉乐. 植物细胞自噬研究进展. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2010, 32(5): 677-698.

Wang Y, Liu Y L. Progress in plant autophagy. Chinese Journal of Cell Biology, 2010, 32(5): 677-698. (in Chinese)

[8]Obara K, Sekito T, Niimi K, Ohsumi Y. The Atg18-Atg2 complex is recruited to autophagic membranes via phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and exerts an essential function. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2008, 283(35): 23972-23980.

[9]Rieter E, Vinke F, Bakula D, Cebollero E, Ungermann C, Proikas-Cezanne T, Reggiori F. Atg18 function in autophagy is regulated by specific sites within its β-propeller. Journal of Cell Science, 2013, 126(2): 593-604.

[10]Nair U, Klionsky D J. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of specific and nonspecific autophagy pathways in yeast. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2005, 280(51): 41785-41788.

[11]Dove S K, Piper R C, McEwen R K, Yu J W, King M C, Hughes D C, Thuring J, Holmes A B, Cooke F T, Michell R H, Parker P J, Lemmon M A. Svp1p defines a family of phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate effectors. The EMBO Journal, 2004, 23(9): 1922-1933.

[12]Krick R, Henke S, Tolstrup J, Thumm M. Dissecting the localization and function of Atg18, Atg21 and Ygr223c. Autophagy, 2008, 4(7): 896-910.

[13]Xiong Y, Contento A L, Bassham D C. AtATG18a is required for the formation of autophagosomes during nutrient stress and senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 2005, 42(4): 535-546.

[14]Xia K, Liu T, Ouyang J, Wang R, Fan T, Zhang M. Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of autophagy- associated gene homologues in rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Research, 2011, 18(5): 363-377.

[15]Xiong Y, Contento A L, Nguyen P Q, Bassham D C. Degradation of oxidized proteins by autophagy during oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2007, 143(1): 291-299.

[16]Liu Y, Xiong Y, Bassham D C. Autophagy is required for tolerance of drought and salt stress in plants. Autophagy, 2009, 5(7): 954-963.

[17]Lenz H D, Haller E, Melzer E, Kober K, Wurster K, Stahl M, Bassham D C, Vierstra R D, Parker J E, Bautor J, Molina A, Escudero V, Shindo T, van der Hoorn R A, Gust A A, Nürnberger T. Autophagy differentially controls plant basal immunity to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. The Plant Journal, 2011, 66(5): 818-830.

[18]Lai Z, Wang F, Zheng Z, Fan B, Chen Z. A critical role of autophagy in plant resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. The Plant Journal, 2011, 66(6): 953-968.

[19]Wang Y, Wu Y, Tang D. The autophagy gene, ATG18a, plays a negative role in powdery mildew resistance and mildew-induced cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 2011, 6(9): 1408-1410.

[20]Han S, Yu B, Wang Y, Liu Y. Role of plant autophagy in stress response. Protein and Cell, 2011, 2(10): 784-791.

[21]Hayward A P, Dinesh-Kumar S P. What can plant autophagy do for an innate immune response? Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2011, 49: 557-576.

[22]Bassham D C, Laporte M, Marty F, Moriyasu Y, Ohsumi Y, Olsen L J, Yoshimoto K. Autophagy in development and stress responses of plants. Autophagy, 2006, 2(1): 2-11.

[23]Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL Workspace: A web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22(2): 195-201.

[24]Larkin M A, Blackshields G, Brown N P, Chenna R, McGettigan P A, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace I M, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson J D, Gibson T J, Higgins D G. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23(21): 2947-2948.

[25]Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2007, 24(8): 1596-1599.

[26]Wilkinson P A, Winfield M O, Barker G L, Allen A M, Burridge A, Coghill J A, Edwards K J. CerealsDB 2.0: An integrated resource for plant breeders and scientists. BMC Bioinformatics, 2012, 13: 219.

[27]Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods, 2001, 25(4): 402-408.

[28]Nair U, Cao Y, Xie Z, Klionsky D J. Roles of the lipid-binding motifs of Atg18 and Atg21 in the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway and autophagy. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2010, 285(15): 11476-11488.

[29]Krick R, Busse R A, Scacioc A, Stephan M, Janshoff A, Thumm M, Kühnel K. Structural and functional characterization of the two phosphoinositide binding sites of PROPPINs, a β-propeller protein family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2012, 109(30): 2042-2049.

[30]Watanabe Y, Kobayashi T, Yamamoto H, Hoshida H, Akada R, Inagaki F, Ohsumi Y, Noda N N. Structure-based analyses reveal distinct binding sites for Atg2 and phosphoinositides in Atg18. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2012, 287(38): 31681-31690.

[31]Proikas-Cezanne T, Waddell S, Gaugel A, Frickey T, Lupas A, Nordheim A. WIPI-1alpha (WIPI49), a member of the novel 7-bladed WIPI protein family, is aberrantly expressed in human cancer and is linked to starvation-induced autophagy. Oncogene, 2004, 23(58): 9314-9325.

[32]Baskaran S, Ragusa M J, Boura E, Hurley J H. Two-site recognition of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate by PROPPINs in autophagy. Molecules and Cells, 2012, 47(3): 339-348.

[33]Liu Y, Schiff M, Czymmek K, Tallóczy Z, Levine B, Dinesh-Kumar S P. Autophagy regulates programmed cell death during the plant innate immune response. Cell, 2005, 121(4): 567-577.

[34]Patel S, Dinesh-Kumar S P. Arabidopsis ATG6 is required to limit the pathogen-associated cell death response. Autophagy, 2008, 4(1): 20-27.

[35]Hofius D, Schultz-Larsen T, Joensen J, Tsitsigiannis D I, Petersen N H, Mattsson O, Jørgensen L B, Jones J D, Mundy J, Petersen M. Autophagic components contribute to hypersensitive cell death in Arabidopsis. Cell, 2009, 137(4): 773-783.

[36]Wang Y, Nishimura M T, Zhao T, Tang D. ATG2, an autophagy-related protein, negatively affects powdery mildew resistance and mildew-induced cell death in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 2011, 68(1): 74-87.

[37]Thomma B P, Penninckx I A, Broekaert W F, Cammue B P. The complexity of disease signaling in Arabidopsis. Current Opinion in Immunology, 2001, 13(1): 63-68.

[38]Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2005, 43: 205-227.

[39]Yoshimoto K, Jikumaru Y, Kamiya Y, Kusano M, Consonni C, Panstruga R, Ohsumi Y, Shirasu K. Autophagy negatively regulates cell death by controlling NPR1-dependent salicylic acid signaling during senescence and the innate immune response in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2009, 21(9): 2914-2927.

[40]Ton J, Flors V, Mauch-Mani B. The multifaceted role of ABA in disease resistance. Trends in Plant Science, 2009, 14(6): 310-317.

[41]Chen C N, Chen H R, Yeh S Y, Vittore G, Ho T H. Autophagy is enhanced and floral development is impaired in AtHVA22d RNA interference Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2009, 149(4): 1679-1689.
[1] CAI WeiDi,ZHANG Yu,LIU HaiYan,ZHENG HengBiao,CHENG Tao,TIAN YongChao,ZHU Yan,CAO WeiXing,YAO Xia. Early Detection on Wheat Canopy Powdery Mildew with Hyperspectral Imaging [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1110-1126.
[2] LI WenHui,HE YiJing,JIANG Yao,ZHAO HongYu,PENG Lei,LI Jia,RUI Rong,JU ShiQiang. Effects of FB1 on Apoptosis and Autophagy of Porcine Oocytes in vitro Maturation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1241-1252.
[3] FENG ZiHeng,SONG Li,ZHANG ShaoHua,JING YuHang,DUAN JianZhao,HE Li,YIN Fei,FENG Wei. Wheat Powdery Mildew Monitoring Based on Information Fusion of Multi-Spectral and Thermal Infrared Images Acquired with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 890-906.
[4] ZHANG Jie,JIANG ChangYue,WANG YueJin. Functional Analysis of the Interaction Between Transcription Factors VqWRKY6 and VqbZIP1 in Regulating the Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Chinese Wild Vitis quinquangularis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4626-4639.
[5] KANG Chen,ZHAO XueFang,LI YaDong,TIAN ZheJuan,WANG Peng,WU ZhiMing. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of CC-NBS-LRR Family in Response to Downy Mildew and Powdery Mildew in Cucumis sativus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3751-3766.
[6] SHA RenHe,LAN LiMing,WANG SanHong,LUO ChangGuo. The Resistance Mechanism of Apple Transcription Factor MdWRKY40b to Powdery Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5220-5229.
[7] DING Xi,ZHAO KaiXi,WANG YueJin. Expression of Stilbene Synthase Genes from Chinese Wild Vitis quinquangularis and Its Effect on Resistance of Grape to Powdery Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2): 310-323.
[8] Xin ZHANG,KongLin HUO,XingXing SONG,DuoNi ZHANG,Wen HU,ChuanHuo HU,Xun LI. Effects of GnIH on Autophagy and Apoptosis of Porcine Ovarian Granulosa Cells via p38MAPK Signaling Pathway [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(9): 1904-1912.
[9] Fei QI,Shu LIN,MengFei SONG,MengRu ZHANG,ShuYan CHEN,NaiXin ZHANG,JinFeng CHEN,QunFeng LOU. Screening and Identification of Cucumber Mutant Resistant to Powdery Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 172-182.
[10] ChanJing FENG,GuangZheng SUN,Yang WANG,Qing MA. Functional Analysis of Gene ShARPC5 Involved in Tomato Resistance to Powdery Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 65-73.
[11] LIU MengQi,WU FengYing,WANG YueJin. Expression of Stilbene Synthase Gene and Resistance to Powdery Mildew Analysis of Chinese Wild Vitis quinquangularis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(14): 2436-2449.
[12] HAO JunJie, LI Lei, WANG Bo, QIN YuHong, CUI Jian, WANG Ying, WANG PeiSheng, JIANG ZhiXun, SUN JiLu, WANG ZhenQing, YUE Huan, ZHANG ShouCai . Fine Mapping and Analysis Candidate Gene to Powdery Mildew in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(17): 3427-3434.
[13] WANG Yu-hai, HE Fang, BAO Yin-guang, MING Dong-feng, DONG Lei, HAN Qing-dian, LI Ying-ying, WANG Hong-gang. Development and Genetic Analysis of a Novel Wheat-Aegilops Germplasm TA002 Resistant to Powdery Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(3): 418-428.
[14] ZHANG Rui-qi, FENG Yi-gao, HOU Fu, CHEN Shu-lin, BIE Tong-de, CHEN Pei-du. The Genetic Effect of Wheat-H.villosa T5VS·5DL Translocated Chromosome on Agronomic Characteristics, Quality and Powdery Mildew Resistance of Common Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(6): 1041-1051.
[15] GUO Li-1, GUO Cheng-Jin-1, LU Wen-Jing-2, LI Xiao-Juan-2, XIAO Kai-1. Chromosome Localization of Phosphate Transporter Gene TaPHT2;1 and Its Effects on Phosphate Uptake and Utilization in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(4): 613-621.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!