基于多年定点的小麦籽粒质量稳定性研究

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.09.016

中国农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (9): 1833-1844.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.09.016

• 研究简报 • 上一篇

基于多年定点的小麦籽粒质量稳定性研究

赵博慧¹(), 张影全¹, 景东林², 刘保华³, 程媛媛², 苏玉环³, 唐娜¹, 张波¹(), 郭波莉¹, 魏益民¹

¹ 中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所/农业农村部粮油加工综合利用技术集成实验室, 北京 100193
² 邢台市农业科学研究院,河北邢台 054099
³ 邯郸市农业科学院，河北邯郸 056011

收稿日期:2023-09-24 接受日期:2024-01-18 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-05-09
通信作者:
张波，E-mail：zjzb1978@126.com
联系方式: 赵博慧，E-mail：zhaobohui1999@126.com。
基金资助:
财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-03); 中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所创新工程(CAAS-ASTIP-2022-IFST)

A Study on the Quality Stability of Wheat Grains at Designated Locations Across Multiple Years

ZHAO BoHui¹(), ZHANG YingQuan¹, JING DongLin², LIU BaoHua³, CHENG YuanYuan², SU YuHuan³, TANG Na¹, ZHANG Bo¹(), GUO BoLi¹, WEI YiMin¹

¹ Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Integrated Laboratory of Grain and Oil Processing and Comprehensive Utilization Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193
² Xingtai Agricultural Science Research Institute, Xingtai 054099, Hebei
³ Handan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Handan 056011, Hebei

Received:2023-09-24 Accepted:2024-01-18 Published:2024-05-01 Online:2024-05-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】质量稳定的小麦原粮可以保持加工工艺及其参数基本不变，减少加工过程中人为干预，并降低工艺调整过程损耗，同时保证面制品质量的稳定性。开展品种质量稳定性评价可以为加工企业采购质量稳定的原粮提供参考。【方法】以2013—2019年邢台市和邯郸市种植的7个小麦品种师栾02-1、济麦22、良星99、邯6172、婴泊700、鲁原502和藁优2018为参试样品，采用变异系数定量表征品种在多年、多地的质量稳定性。将容重、籽粒粗蛋白含量、湿面筋含量、面团稳定时间相乘，计算其乘积的变异系数，作为质量稳定性的综合性表征统计量。对同年同地的品种两两配对，分析其质量指标的稳定性。【结果】参试样品容重、蛋白质含量、湿面筋含量、面团稳定时间、质量指标乘积变异系数的波动范围分别为0.06%—5.50%、0.01%—12.21%、0.03%—10.02%、0.4%—138.69%、0.32%—140.01%。配对分析显示，品种容重稳定性从高到低依次为藁优2018、鲁原502、邯6172、良星99、婴泊700、济麦22、师栾02-1。籽粒粗蛋白含量稳定性从高到低依次为藁优2018、邯6172、婴泊700、鲁原502、良星99、济麦22、师栾02-1。湿面筋含量稳定性从高到低依次为藁优2018、邯6172、鲁原502、婴泊700、良星99、师栾02-1、济麦22。面团稳定时间稳定性从高到低依次为婴泊700、济麦22、藁优2018、鲁原502、邯6172、良星99、师栾02-1。上述质量指标乘积稳定性从高到低依次为婴泊700、藁优2018、鲁原502、良星99、邯6172、济麦22、师栾02-1。【结论】参试的质量指标中，容重的稳定性较高，面团稳定时间的稳定性较低，籽粒粗蛋白含量和湿面筋含量的稳定性介于两者之间。以4个质量指标乘积的变异系数为评价依据，婴泊700在参试品种中质量稳定性较高。

关键词: 小麦, 籽粒质量, 品质稳定性, 加工品质, 变异系数

Abstract:

【Objective】The stable quality of wheat raw grain can keep the processing technology and its parameters basically unchanged, reduce human intervention in the processing process and the loss of process adjustment, and ensure the stability of the quality of flour products. The evaluation of variety quality stability could provide the reference for processing enterprises to purchase stable quality raw grain.【Method】In this experiment, seven wheat varieties, including Shiluan 02-1, Jimai 22, Liangxing 99, Han 6172, Yingbo 700, Luyuan 502, and Gaoyou 2018, were planted in Xingtai and Handan cities from 2013 to 2019 and selected as trial samples. The coefficient of variation was used to quantitatively characterize the quality stability of varieties over multiple years and locations. The product of test weight, crude protein in grains, wet gluten content, and dough stability time was calculated, and its coefficient of variation was used as a comprehensive statistical measure of quality stability. Pairwise analysis of varieties in the same year and location was conducted to analyze the stability of their quality indicators.【Result】The fluctuation ranges of test weight, crude protein in grains, wet gluten content, dough stability time, and the coefficient of variation of the product of quality indicators were 0.06%-5.50%, 0.01%-12.21%, 0.03%-10.02%, 0.4%-138.69%, and 0.32%-140.01%, respectively. Pairwise analysis showed that the stability of test weight from high to low was Gaoyou 2018, Luyuan 502, Han 6172, Liangxing 99, Yingbo 700, Jimai 22, and Shiluan 02-1. The stability of crude protein in grains from high to low was Gaoyou2018, Han 6172, Yingbo 700, Luyuan 502, Liangxing 99, Jimai 22, and Shiluan 02-1. The stability of wet gluten content from high to low was Gaoyou 2018, Han 6172, Luyuan 502, Yingbo 700, Liangxing 99, Shiluan 02-1, and Jimai 22. The stability of dough stability time from high to low was Yingbo 700, Jimai 22, Gaoyou 2018, Luyuan 502, Han 6172, Liangxing 99, and Shiluan 02-1. The stability of the product of the above quality indicators from high to low was Yingbo 700, Gaoyou 2018, Luyuan 502, Liangxing 99, Han 6172, Jimai 22, and Shiluan 02-1. 【Conclusion】Among the tested quality indicators, test weight showed higher stability, while dough stability time exhibited lower stability. The stability of crude protein in grains and wet gluten content fell between the two. By using the coefficient of variation of the product of four quality indicators as the evaluation criterion, Yingbo 700 demonstrated higher quality stability among the trial varieties.

Key words: wheat, grain quality, quality stability, processing quality, coefficient of variation

赵博慧, 张影全, 景东林, 刘保华, 程媛媛, 苏玉环, 唐娜, 张波, 郭波莉, 魏益民. 基于多年定点的小麦籽粒质量稳定性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1833-1844.

ZHAO BoHui, ZHANG YingQuan, JING DongLin, LIU BaoHua, CHENG YuanYuan, SU YuHuan, TANG Na, ZHANG Bo, GUO BoLi, WEI YiMin. A Study on the Quality Stability of Wheat Grains at Designated Locations Across Multiple Years[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1833-1844.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.09.016

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2024/V57/I9/1833

图/表 6

表1

参试小麦种植年份地点和样品数"

年份 Year	城市 City	品种 Variety	样品数 Number of samples
2013	邢台市 Xingtai	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	7
2013	邯郸市 Handan	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	4
2014	邢台市 Xingtai	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	4
2014	邯郸市 Handan	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	6
2015	邢台市 Xingtai	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	3
2015	邯郸市 Handan	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	9
2016	邢台市 Xingtai	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	5
2016	邯郸市 Handan	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	6
2017	邢台市 Xingtai	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	5
2017	邯郸市 Handan	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	2
2018	邢台市 Xingtai	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	5
2018	邯郸市 Handan	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	4
2019	邢台市 Xingtai	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	7
2013	邢台市 Xingtai	济麦22 Jimai 22	11
2013	邯郸市 Handan	济麦22 Jimai 22	8
2014	邢台市 Xingtai	济麦22 Jimai 22	17
2014	邯郸市 Handan	济麦22 Jimai 22	7
2015	邢台市 Xingtai	济麦22 Jimai 22	10
2015	邯郸市 Handan	济麦22 Jimai 22	6
2016	邢台市 Xingtai	济麦22 Jimai 22	8
2017	邢台市 Xingtai	济麦22 Jimai 22	12
2017	邯郸市 Handan	济麦22 Jimai 22	3
2018	邢台市 Xingtai	济麦22 Jimai 22	12
2018	邯郸市 Handan	济麦22 Jimai 22	4
2019	邢台市 Xingtai	济麦22 Jimai 22	9
2013	邢台市 Xingtai	良星99 Liangxing 99	4
2013	邯郸市 Handan	良星99 Liangxing 99	2
2014	邢台市 Xingtai	良星99 Liangxing 99	5
2014	邯郸市 Handan	良星99 Liangxing 99	2
2015	邯郸市 Handan	良星99 Liangxing 99	2
2016	邢台市 Xingtai	良星99 Liangxing 99	3
2016	邯郸市 Handan	良星99 Liangxing 99	3
2017	邢台市 Xingtai	良星99 Liangxing 99	3
2013	邯郸市 Handan	邯6172 Han 6172	16
2014	邯郸市 Handan	邯6172 Han 6172	13
2015	邯郸市 Handan	邯6172 Han 6172	11
2016	邯郸市 Handan	邯6172 Han 6172	5
2017	邯郸市 Handan	邯6172 Han 6172	4
2018	邯郸市 Handan	邯6172 Han 6172	4
2014	邢台市 Xingtai	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	2
2015	邢台市 Xingtai	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	2
2015	邯郸市 Handan	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	3
2017	邢台市 Xingtai	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	2
2018	邢台市 Xingtai	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	2
2018	邯郸市 Handan	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	2
2014	邢台市 Xingtai	鲁原502 Luyuan 502	5
2015	邢台市 Xingtai	鲁原502 Luyuan 502	7
2017	邯郸市 Handan	鲁原502 Luyuan 502	3
2018	邢台市 Xingtai	鲁原502 Luyuan 502	3
2019	邯郸市 Handan	鲁原502 Luyuan 502	3
2013	邢台市 Xingtai	藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	6
2013	邯郸市 Handan	藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	2
2014	邯郸市 Handan	藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	2
2016	邢台市 Xingtai	藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	2

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 31

[1]	张勇, 郝元峰, 张艳, 何心尧, 夏先春, 何中虎. 小麦营养和健康品质研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(22): 4284-4298. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.003.
	ZHANG Y, HAO Y F, ZHANG Y, HE X Y, XIA X C, HE Z H. Progress in research on genetic improvement of nutrition and health qualities in wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(22): 4284-4298. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.003. (in Chinese)
[2]	胡学旭, 孙丽娟, 周桂英, 吴丽娜, 陆伟, 李为喜, 王爽, 杨秀兰, 宋敬可, 王步军. 2006—2015年中国小麦质量年度变化. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(16): 3063-3072. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.16.001.
	HU X X, SUN L J, ZHOU G Y, WU L N, LU W, LI W X, WANG S, YANG X L, SONG J K, WANG B J. Variations of wheat quality in China from 2006 to 2015. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(16): 3063-3072. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.16.001. (in Chinese)
[3]	赵惠吉, 邹渝丰, 钟宇. 小麦粉加工工艺对质量指标的影响. 现代食品, 2022, 28(10): 102-105.
	ZHAO H J, ZOU Y F, ZHONG Y. The influence of wheat flour processing technology on quality indexes. Modern Food, 2022, 28(10): 102-105. (in Chinese)
[4]	田宪玺, 王雪艳, 陈书亮, 董斌. 山东小麦加工业高质量发展问题研究. 粮食与油脂, 2022, 35(3): 8-11.
	TIAN X X, WANG X Y, CHEN S L, DONG B. Research on high quality development of wheat processing industry in Shandong. Cereals & Oils, 2022, 35(3): 8-11. (in Chinese)
[5]	马冬云, 朱云集, 郭天财, 王晨阳. 基因型和环境及其互作对河南省小麦品质的影响及品质稳定性分析. 麦类作物学报, 2002, 22(4): 13-18.
	MA D Y, ZHU Y J, GUO T C, WANG C Y. Effects of genotype, environment and G×E interaction on wheat quality of Henan province and the stability analysis. Acta Tritical Crops, 2002, 22(4): 13-18. (in Chinese)
[6]	杨学举, 周进宝, 万永红. 优质小麦品质性状的环境变异研究. 麦类作物学报, 2000, 20(3): 21-24.
	YANG X J, ZHOU J B, WAN Y H. Study on variation of quality characters of high quality wheat grown in different environment. Acta Tritical Crops, 2000, 20(3): 21-24. (in Chinese)
[7]	李晓航, 盛坤. 2011—2015年黄淮麦区小麦品种品质分析. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(18): 134-140. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19030024
	LI X H, SHENG K. Wheat quality in Huang-Huai wheat region from 2011 to 2015. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(18): 134-140. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19030024
[8]	张强涛, 何渊博. 师栾02-1 小麦2015—2019年质量变化与分析. 现代面粉工业, 2020, 34(4): 18-21.
	ZHANG Q T, HE Y B. Quality change and analysis of wheat Shiluan 02-1 from 2015 to 2019. Modern Flour Milling Industry, 2020, 34(4): 18-21. (in Chinese)
[9]	田纪春, 胡瑞波, 陈建省, 张永祥, 王延训. 小麦粉面团稳定时间的变化及其稳定性分析. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(11): 2165-2172.
	TIAN J C, HU R B, CHEN J S, ZHANG Y X, WANG Y X. Variation and stability analysis of wheat dough stability time. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(11): 2165-2172. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.at-2004-2002
[10]	洪宇, 吴海彬, 段晓亮, 常柳, 邢晓婷, 孙辉. 强筋小麦品种周麦33号品质性状稳定性及食品加工适用性分析. 粮油食品科技, 2021, 29(2): 94-99.
	HONG Y, WU H B, DUAN X L, CHANG L, XING X T, SUN H. Stability of quality characters and applicability of food processing of strong gluten wheat variety Zhoumai 33. Science and Technology of Cereals, Oils and Foods, 2021, 29(2): 94-99. (in Chinese)
[11]	杨攀, 秦毛毛, 刘艳喜, 张琨, 吴政卿, 周正富, 晁岳恩. 小麦品种郑麦158的品质特点及其稳定性分析. 现代农业科技, 2020(16): 3-4, 6.
	YANG P, QIN M M, LIU Y X, ZHANG K, WU Z Q, ZHOU Z F, CHAO Y E. Quality characteristics and stability analysis of wheat variety Zhengmai 158. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(16): 3-4, 6. (in Chinese)
[12]	班进福, 李彩华, 郭家宝, 赵彦坤, 郭进考, 刘彦军. 优质强筋冬小麦石优20号品质稳定性分析. 河北农业科学, 2020, 24(1): 65-69.
	BAN J F, LI C H, GUO J B, ZHAO Y K, GUO J K, LIU Y J. Analysis on quality stability of strong gluten wheat Shiyou No.20. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 24(1): 65-69. (in Chinese)
[13]	郭天财, 马冬云, 朱云集, 王晨阳, 夏国军, 罗毅. 冬播小麦品种主要品质性状的基因型与环境及其互作效应分析. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(7): 948-953.
	GUO T C, MA D Y, ZHU Y J, WANG C Y, XIA G J, LUO Y. Genotype, environment and their interactive effects on main quality traits of winter-sown wheat variety. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004, 37(7): 948-953. (in Chinese)
[14]	BAENZIGER P S, CLEMENTS R L, MCINTOSH M S, YAMAZAKI W T, STARLING T M, SAMMONS D J, JOHNSON J W. Effect of cultivar, environment, and their interaction and stability analyses on milling and baking quality of soft red winter wheat. Crop Science, 1985, 25(1): 5-8. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500010002x
[15]	魏益民, 尹成华, 田纪春, 刘彦军, 欧阳韶晖. 黄淮冬麦区小麦籽粒质量研究报告. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
	WEI Y M, YIN C H, TIAN J C, LIU Y J, OUYANF S H. Research Report on Wheat Grain Quality of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Beijing: Science Press, 2017. (in Chinese)
[16]	EBERHART S A, RUSSELL W A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 1966, 6(1): 36-40. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
[17]	HAZEN S P, WARD R W. Variation in soft winter wheat characteristics measured by the single kernel characterization system. Crop Science, 1997, 37(4): 1079-1086. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700040008x
[18]	MLADENOV N, PRZULJ N, HRISTOV N, DJURIC V, MILOVANOVIC M. Cultivar-by-environment interactions for wheat quality traits in semiarid conditions. Cereal Chemistry, 2001, 78(3): 363-367. doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.2001.78.3.363
[19]	刘艳喜, 秦毛毛, 周正富, 张琨, 赵梦琪, 吴政卿, 雷振生. 优质强筋小麦品种郑麦379的品质及其稳定性分析. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(12): 30-36.
	LIU Y X, QIN M M, ZHOU Z F, ZHANG K, ZHAO M Q, WU Z Q, LEI Z S. Quality and its stability of strong gluten wheat variety Zhengmai 379. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(12): 30-36. (in Chinese)
[20]	康立宁, 魏益民, 欧阳韶晖, 张国权. 基因型与环境对小麦品种粉质参数的影响. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(1): 91-95.
	KANG L N, WEI Y M, OUYANG S H, ZHANG G Q. Genotype and environment effects on farinograms of winter wheat variety. Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica, 2003, 23(1): 91-95. (in Chinese)
[21]	张学林, 梅四伟, 郭天财, 王晨阳, 朱云集, 王永华. 遗传和环境因素对不同冬小麦品种品质性状的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010, 30(2): 249-253.
	ZHANG X L, MEI S W, GUO T C, WANG C Y, ZHU Y J, WANG Y H. Effects of genotype and environment on winter wheat qualities. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2010, 30(2): 249-253. (in Chinese)
[22]	康立宁. 小麦品种(品系)品质稳定性研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2000.
	KANG L N. Study on quality property stability of wheat varieties[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2000. (in Chinese)
[23]	姚大年, 李保云, 梁荣奇, 刘广田. 基因型和环境对小麦品种淀粉性状及面条品质的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2000, 5(1): 63-68.
	YAO D N, LI B Y, LIANG R Q, LIU G T. Effects of wheat genotypes and environments to starch properties and noodle quality. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2000, 5(1): 63-68. (in Chinese)
[24]	PETERSON C J, GRAYBOSCH R A, BAENZIGER P S, GROMBACHER A W. Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Science, 1992, 32(1): 98-103. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010022x
[25]	MILLER B S, POMERANZ Y, AFEWORK S. Hardness (Texture) of hard red winter wheat grown in a soft wheat area and of soft red winter wheat grown in a hard wheat area. Cereal Chemistry, 1984, 61(2): 201-203.
[26]	张璐, 刘清, 侯致武. 使用SPSS进行单因素方差分析. 现代商贸工业, 2016, 37(32): 174-175.
	ZHANG L, LIU Q, HOU Z W. One-way ANOVA was performed by SPSS. Modern Business Trade Industry, 2016, 37(32): 174-175. (in Chinese)
[27]	杨小勇. 方差分析法浅析: 单因素的方差分析. 实验科学与技术, 2013, 11(1): 41-43.
	YANG X Y. Discussion of variance analysis: The single factor variance analysis. Experiment Science and Technology, 2013, 11(1): 41-43. (in Chinese)
[28]	龚学臣. SPSS软件在交互效应方差分析中的应用. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2015, 31(1): 19-22.
	GONG X C. Application of SPSS software in multivariate analysis of variance. Journal of Hebei North University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 31(1): 19-22. (in Chinese)
[29]	赵云. 两独立总体T检验的SPSS实现. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(20): 44-47.
	ZHAO Y. SPSS implementation of t test for two independent populations. Statistics & Decision, 2021, 37(20): 44-47. (in Chinese)
[30]	应智霞, 施陈, 邹志文. 3种常见统计软件在生物统计学教学中的应用比较: 以配对数据t-检验为例. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(13): 197-199, 207.
	YING Z X, SHI C, ZOU Z W. Comparison of the application of three statistical software in biostatistics teaching-A case study of paired t-test. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 27(13): 197-199, 207. (in Chinese)
[31]	张时民. 配对t检验和相关分析中的误区. 江西医学检验, 2001, 19(5): 303-305.
	ZHANG S M. Misunderstandings in paired t-test and correlation analysis. Jiangxi Journal of Medical Laboratory Sciences, 2001, 19(5): 303-305. (in Chinese)

品种 Variety	年份和种植市作为随机变量的重复数 The number of replicates of the year and planting city as random variables	容重变异系数 Coefficient of variation of test weight	籽粒粗蛋白变异系数 Coefficient of variation of crude protein in grains	湿面筋含量变异系数 Coefficient of variation of wet gluten content	面团稳定时间变异系数 Coefficient of variation of dough stability time	质量指标乘积变异系数 Coefficient of variation of product of quality indicators
师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	13	2.14±1.97a	5.09±4.20a	4.95±1.91a	27.92±32.63a	91.61±174.94a
济麦22 Jimai 22	12	1.86±0.76a	4.57±1.39a	5.89±1.97a	4.57±1.39a	26.03±16.15a
良星99 Liangxing 99	8	1.15±1.04a	3.30±2.13a	4.99±2.31a	25.52±12.34a	22.23±8.62a
邯6172 Han 6172	6	1.25±0.21a	3.45±1.29a	3.80±2.25a	33.52±45.75a	34.06±46.83a
婴泊700 Yingpo 700	6	1.74±1.03a	3.79±1.63a	4.76±3.99a	6.06±3.24a	8.59±5.91a
鲁原502 Luyuan 502	5	1.30±0.74a	4.76±2.35a	5.04±2.04a	26.99±15.70a	26.80±14.87a
藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	4	1.29±0.67a	2.62±1.68a	2.70±2.02a	33.61±27.61a	27.88±17.72a

品种 Variety	年份作为随机变量的重复数 The number of replicates of the year as a random variable		容重变异系数 Coefficient of variation of test weight		籽粒粗蛋白变异系数 Coefficient of variation of crude protein in grains		湿面筋含量变异系数 Coefficient of variation of wet gluten content		面团稳定时间变异系数 Coefficient of variation of dough stability time		质量指标乘积变异系数 Coefficient of variation of product of quality indicators
品种 Variety	邢台市 Xingtai	邯郸市 Handan	邢台市 Xingtai	邯郸市 Handan	邢台市 Xingtai	邯郸市 Handan	邢台市 Xingtai	邯郸市 Handan	邢台市 Xingtai	邯郸市 Handan	邢台市 Xingtai	邯郸市 Handan
师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1	7	6	1.11±0.59a	3.33±2.37a	3.43±2.54a	7.03±4.88a	4.52±1.71ab	5.45±2.01ab	29.38±18.45a	26.22±43.65a	29.35±18.69a	22.97±2.06a
济麦22 Jimai 22	7	5	2.07±0.51a	1.57±0.94a	5.05±1.58a	3.89±0.57a	6.11±2.30a	5.58±1.32ab	5.05±1.58b	3.89±0.57a	4.95±3.51a	15.88±0.71a
良星99 Liangxing 99	4	4	1.33±0.74a	0.98±1.25a	4.09±1.87a	2.51±2.07a	5.75±1.61ab	4.23±2.62ab	29.60±11.66a	21.44±11.65a	29.85±19.13a	20.67±8.02a
邯6172 Han 6172	0	6	-	1.25±0.21a	-	3.45±1.29a	-	3.80±2.25b	-	33.52±45.75a	-	64.82±48.64a
婴泊700 Yingpo 700	4	2	1.62±1.18a	1.99±0.55a	3.53±1.60a	4.31±1.55a	2.62±1.20b	9.05±4.17a	4.75±2.00b	8.68±3.63a	114.57±231.66a	19.6±3.82a
鲁原502 Luyuan 502	3	2	1.65±0.78a	0.77±0.01a	5.27±2.19a	4.00±2.38a	6.18±1.48a	3.33±1.48b	29.36±19.60a	23.44±4.33a	24.87±10.96a	34.06±46.83a
藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	2	2	1.44±0.63a	0.92±0.79a	3.85±1.94a	1.88±0.71a	2.49±2.20b	2.91±2.43b	28.75±10.03ab	40.18±37.59a	24.83±10.14a	31.00±23.24a

品种 Variety	师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1						济麦22 Jimai 22					良星99 Liangxing 99
品种 Variety	济麦22 Jimai 22	良星99 Liangxing 99	邯6172 Han 6172	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	鲁原502 Luyuan 502	藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	良星99 Liangxing 99	邯61721 Han 6172	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	鲁原502 Luyuan 502	藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018	婴泊700 Yingpo 700	藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018
容重 Test weight			0.012		0.26	0.021	0.011	0.008	0.019	0.08	0.001
籽粒粗蛋白含量Crude protein in grains			0.018	0.040	0.035	0.010	0.036	0.012	0.007	0.041	0.001
湿面筋含量Wet gluten			0.004		0.029	0.001		0.007	0.009		0.001		0.018
面团稳定时间Dough stability time	0.025			0.025		0.017	0.029					0.015
质量指标乘积 Product of quality indicators	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.002			0.011

基于多年定点的小麦籽粒质量稳定性研究

A Study on the Quality Stability of Wheat Grains at Designated Locations Across Multiple Years

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张余周, 王一钊, 高茹茜, 刘逸凡. 小麦根系构型及抗旱性研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1633-1645.
[2]	周全, 路秋梅, 赵张晨, 武宸冉, 符笑歌, 赵玉娇, 韩勇, 蔺怀龙, 陈微林, 牟丽明, 李兴茂, 王长海, 胡银岗, 陈亮. 244份春小麦苗期抗旱性的鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1646-1657.
[3]	张颖, 石婷瑞, 曹瑞, 潘文秋, 宋卫宁, 王利, 聂小军. ICARDA引进-小麦苗期抗旱性的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1658-1673.
[4]	燕雯, 金秀良, 李龙, 徐子涵, 苏悦, 张跃强, 景蕊莲, 毛新国, 孙黛珍. 基于无人机多源影像数据的灌浆期人工合成小麦抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1674-1686.
[5]	臧少龙, 刘淋茹, 高越之, 吴珂, 贺利, 段剑钊, 宋晓, 冯伟. 基于无人机影像多时相的小麦品种氮效率分类识别[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1687-1708.
[6]	韩潇杰, 任志杰, 李双静, 田培培, 卢素豪, 马耕, 王丽芳, 马冬云, 赵亚南, 王晨阳. 不同施氮量对土壤团聚体碳氮含量及小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1766-1778.
[7]	李永飞, 李战魁, 张战胜, 陈永伟, 康建宏, 吴宏亮. 氮肥后移对高温胁迫下春小麦旗叶生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(8): 1455-1468.
[8]	董慧雪, 陈倩, 郭晓江, 王际睿. 小麦穗发芽抗性机制及抗性育种研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(7): 1237-1254.
[9]	刘泽厚, 王琴, 叶美金, 万洪深, 杨宁, 杨漫宇, 杨武云, 李俊. 人工合成小麦和地方品种穗发芽抗性育种利用效率[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(7): 1255-1266.
[10]	梁王壮, 唐雅楠, 刘佳荟, 郭晓江, 董慧雪, 祁鹏飞, 王际睿. 小麦发芽对面粉质量与加工产品品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(7): 1267-1280.
[11]	高晨凯, 刘水苗, 李煜铭, 赵志恒, 邵京, 于昊琳, 吴鹏年, 王艳丽, 关小康, 王同朝, 温鹏飞. 冬小麦水分利用效率相关驱动因子及其预测模型构建[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(7): 1281-1294.
[12]	董在芳, 丁腾腾, 单艺轩, 李洪连, 陈琳琳, 邢小萍. 自噬相关基因FpAtg3参与假禾谷镰孢的生长和致病[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(6): 1080-1090.
[13]	党建友, 姜文超, 孙睿, 尚保华, 裴雪霞. 旱地小麦产量和水分利用对翻耕时间和降水量及其分布的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(6): 1049-1065.
[14]	卫乃翠, 陶金博, 苑名杨, 张彧, 开梦想, 乔玲, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 王娟玲, 赵佳佳, 郑军. 山西小麦苗期耐低磷特性及遗传分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 831-845.
[15]	高尚洁, 刘杏认, 李迎春, 柳晓婉. 施用生物炭和秸秆还田对农田温室气体排放及增温潜势的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 935-949.