中国农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 1243-1257.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.06.014

• 食品科学与工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于3种方法的西南杂交籼稻稻米食味评价及品种优选

卢慧1(),袁玉洁1,张丝琪1,陈虹1,陈多1,钟晓媛1,李博1,邓飞1,陈勇1,李贵勇2,任万军1()   

  1. 1四川农业大学/农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,四川温江 611130
    2云南省农业科学院粮食作物研究所,昆明 650200
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-30 接受日期:2020-09-03 出版日期:2021-03-16 发布日期:2021-03-25
  • 通讯作者: 任万军
  • 作者简介:卢慧,E-mail:luhui@stu.sicau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家粮食丰产增效科技创新专项(2016YFD03005-06);国家粮食丰产增效科技创新专项(2018YFD030141-04);四川省育种攻关项目(2016NYZ0051)

Evaluation of Rice Eating Quality and Optimization of Varieties of Southwest Indica Hybrid Rice Based on Three Taste Evaluation Methods

Hui LU1(),YuJie YUAN1,SiQi ZHANG1,Hong CHEN1,Duo CHEN1,XiaoYuan ZHONG1,Bo LI1,Fei DENG1,Yong CHEN1,GuiYong LI2,WanJun REN1()   

  1. 1Sichuan Agricultural University/Crop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Wenjiang 611130, Sichuan
    2Institute of Food Crops of Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650200
  • Received:2020-06-30 Accepted:2020-09-03 Online:2021-03-16 Published:2021-03-25
  • Contact: WanJun REN

摘要:

【目的】基于现有3种稻米食味评价方法,研究西南稻区不同杂交籼稻品种食味品质特点,并优选出优良食味杂交籼稻品种。【方法】在2017年品种筛选试验的基础上,于2018年在云南永胜和四川大邑分别采用单因素随机区组田间试验,应用2种国标感官评价和食味计进行评价,比较分析20个杂交籼稻品种的食味品质差异及其对食味评价方法的响应。【结果】稻米食味品质受多种因素共同调控,食味优良的品种具有在2种感官评价下稻米的气味、外观、适口性、滋味和冷饭质地,以及食味计评价下的外观和口感评分均优良的共性,进而具有较高的食味品质。通径分析表明,适口性对食味贡献率最大,滋味和外观次之,冷饭质地最低。不同品种间稻米食味品质差异明显。3种评价方法下,宜香优2115、内5优39、繁优609、花香优1618、川优6203和隆两优1146在2生态点均具有优良食味品质。相较于绿优4923和川优8377等低食味品种,宜香优2115和花香优1618等品种具有较高的气味、外观、适口性、滋味,进而食味较好。品种对不同评价方法的响应存在差异,永胜渝香203和大邑Y两优1号在2种感官评价下均属于低食味品种,但在食味计评价下则显著高于食味计平均食味。线性拟合结果表明,感官百分制评分和等级综合评分线性拟合度高,相关系数r=0.94***,而食味计评分与感官百分制评分和等级综合评分相关系数分别为r=0.49***r=0.53***,离散程度较大,不足以解释相互之间关系。【结论】稻米食味品质受生态条件和品种共同作用,采用单一食味评价方法不能准确评价各品种稻米食味品质。因此,综合运用3种现行食味评价方法,筛选出宜香优2115、内5优39、繁优609、花香优1618、川优6203和隆两优1146等6个食味优良且稳定的品种,可以用作西南优质食味品种推广。

关键词: 水稻, 食味品质, 评价方法, 食味计, 感官评价

Abstract:

【Objective】 Based on the three existing taste evaluation methods, the aim of this study was to research the eating quality characteristics of different indica hybrid rice varieties, and to select the excellent taste indica hybrid rice varieties in Southwest China. 【Method】 Based on the variety screening test in 2017, a single-factor randomized block field experiment was conducted in Yongsheng and Dayi in 2018. The eating quality was evaluated by two national standard sensory evaluation methods and taste analyzer for comparing the response of indica hybrid rice to sensory evaluation method, and the differences were compared among the 20 rice varieties. 【Result】 The eating quality of rice was regulated by multiple factors, the varieties with good taste had common characteristics, including excellent aroma, appearance, palatability, flavor and cold rice texture under the two sensory evaluations, as well as the appearance and taste value under the taste analyzer evaluation, and consequently to better eating quality. The path analysis showed that palatability had the highest contribution, followed by flavor and appearance, and the cold rice texture was the lowest. There were obvious differences in the eating quality of rice among different varieties. Under the three evaluation methods, Yixiangyou 2115, Nei 5 you 39, Fanyou 609, Huaxiangyou 1618, Chuanyou 6203 and Longliangyou 1146 all had excellent eating quality at 2 eco-points. Compared with Lüyou 4923 and Chuanyou 8377, Yixiangyou 2115 and Huaxiangyou 1618 had higher aroma, appearance, palatability, flavor, and consequently to higher eating quality. There were differences in the response of varieties to different evaluation method. Yuxiang 203 at Yongsheng and Y Liangyou 1 hao at Dayi belonged to poor taste varieties under 2 sensory evaluations, whereas both of them significantly higher than average under the evaluation of taste analyzer. The linear fitting results showed that the sensory hundred percentage point system (SHP) and the comprehensive grade rating (CGR) had a high linear fit, the correlation coefficient was r=0.94***, the correlation coefficients of the taste analyzer value (TAV) to SHP and CGR were r=0.49 *** or r=0.53 ***, respectively, and the degree of dispersion was too large to fully explain the internal relationship between each other. 【Conclusion】 The eating quality of rice was affected by ecological conditions and varieties. However, using a single taste evaluation method could not accurately evaluate the eating quality of rice varieties. Therefore, 6 varieties with good and stable taste, including Yixiangyou 2115, Nei 5 you 39, Fanyou 609, Huaxiangyou 1618, Chuanyou 6203 and Longliangyou1146, were selected by comprehensive used of the three current taste evaluation methods, which could be promoted as the high-quality taste varieties in Southwest China.

Key words: rice, eating quality, evaluation method, taste analyzer, sensory evaluation