调理剂及农艺措施对污染稻田中水稻吸收镉的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.03.010

中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 574-584.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.03.010

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇下一篇

调理剂及农艺措施对污染稻田中水稻吸收镉的影响

彭鸥¹,刘玉玲¹,铁柏清¹(),叶长城¹,张淼¹,李园星露¹,周俊驰¹,许蒙¹,张燕¹,龙涌²

¹ 湖南农业大学资源环境学院/湖南省灌溉水源水质污染净化工程技术研究中心,长沙 410128
² 株洲市渌口区南洲镇农技站,湖南株洲 412107

收稿日期:2019-04-25 接受日期:2019-09-12 出版日期:2020-02-01 发布日期:2020-02-13
通讯作者: 铁柏清
作者简介:彭鸥,Tel：18508424171;E-mail：hanhexiaou@foxmail.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0801505);湖南省科技计划项目重点研发计划项目(2016NK2017);长沙市科技计划项目(kq1801025)

Effects of Conditioning Agents and Agronomic Measures on Cadmium Uptake by Rice in Polluted Rice Fields

PENG Ou¹,LIU YuLing¹,TIE BaiQing¹(),YE ChangCheng¹,ZHANG Miao¹,LI YuanXingLu¹,ZHOU JunChi¹,XU Meng¹,ZHANG Yan¹,LONG Yong²

¹ College of Resources and Environment, Hunan Agricultural University/Hunan Engineering & Technology Research Center for Irrigation Water Purification, Changsha 410128;
² Agricultural Technology Service Station, Nanzhou Town, Lukou District, Zhuzhou 412107, Hunan

Received:2019-04-25 Accepted:2019-09-12 Online:2020-02-01 Published:2020-02-13
Contact: BaiQing TIE

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究水分管理、调理剂措施和组合措施对污染稻田稻米降Cd效果,旨在探索出不显著降低水稻产量前提下,能更高效降低土壤Cd生物有效性和稻米中Cd含量的方法。【方法】在湖南省株洲市选择中度Cd污染稻田开展田间小区水稻试验。试验中水稻种植两季,早稻品种为中嘉早17,晚稻为泰优390。试验分为6组,分别为水分管理（T2）处理、施用硅肥（T3）处理、施用竹炭处理（T4）、施用硅肥结合水分管理（T5）处理、施用竹炭结合水分管理（T6）处理和1个试验对照（T1）,重复3次。【结果】试验各处理对稻田土壤有效态Cd含量均有降低,竹炭结合水分管理（T6）处理对两季水稻土壤均有显著降低,硅肥结合水分管理（T5）处理对晚稻土壤有效态Cd降低幅度最大。试验各处理对水稻各部位Cd含量均有降低效果,在糙米Cd含量方面,5个试验处理中对糙米Cd含量降低幅度以组合措施修复技术效果最好,即硅肥结合水分管理（T5）和竹炭结合水分管理（T6）处理。在水分管理修复技术(T2)中降Cd效果最高为29.23%;在施用调理剂修复技术中,硅肥处理（T3）和竹炭处理（T4）对稻壳和糙米中Cd含量均有显著降低（P＜0.05）作用,其中硅肥处理（T3）糙米最高降Cd幅度为49.23%,竹炭处理（T4）糙米最高降Cd幅度为47.69%;在组合措施中均能显著降低水稻糙米Cd含量,其中硅肥结合水分管理（T5）处理糙米降Cd幅度为60.34%—78.46%,竹炭结合水分管理（T6）糙米降Cd幅度为56.90%—67.69%。同时,本文对土壤有效态Cd含量与水稻各部位Cd含量相关性进行分析,发现水稻籽粒（稻壳与糙米）中Cd含量与土壤有效态Cd含量存在极显著正相关（P＜0.01）,且两个水稻品种规律一致。各处理对水稻各部位富集系数亦有降低效果,以硅肥结合水分管理（T5）处理和竹炭结合水分管理（T6）效果最好。对于水稻各部位向籽粒转运系数降低效果各部位规律不一致,但茎鞘和叶片两个部位向籽粒（稻壳和糙米）转运系数均显著降低,水分管理（T2）处理除外。在水稻产量方面,仅水分管理（T2）处理对中嘉早17有显著降低,其他处理降低幅度不显著,各处理对泰优390处理没有显著影响。【结论】组合措施优于单一水分管理或单一调理剂处理,且在水稻产量没有显著降低情况下对稻米Cd污染稻田稻米降Cd幅度最高达到78.46%,可以进一步确保Cd污染农田安全利用。

关键词: 水稻, 水分管理, 镉, 硅肥, 竹炭

Abstract:

【Objective】How to safely use cadmium (Cd) to prevent it from contaminating cultivated land to produce up to standard rice is a hot topic for scholars. This paper mainly explored the effects of water management, conditioning agent measures and combined measures on the Cd reduction of rice in polluted rice fields. It aimed to reduce the bioavailability of soil Cd and the Cd content in rice under the premise of not significantly reducing rice yield【Method】Field rice experiments were carried out in a moderately Cd-contaminated paddy field in Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, through a field plot test. In the experiment, rice was planted for two seasons. The early rice variety was Zhongjiazao17, and the late rice variety was Taiyou390. The test setup design was divided into 6 groups, namely water management treatment (T2), application of silicon fertilizer treatment (T3), application of bamboo charcoal treatment (T4), application of silicon fertilizer combined with water management treatment (T5), application of bamboo charcoal combined with water management treatment (T6), and control (T1), and each treatment was repeated 3 times.【Result】The effective Cd content in the paddy soil was reduced by the treatments. The bamboo charcoal combined with water management treatment (T6) significantly reduced the soil moisture in the two rice grow seasons. The silicon fertilizer combined with water management treatment (T5) had the largest reduction of available cadmium in the late rice soil. The treatments all had the effect of reducing the Cd content in all parts of rice. In the aspect of cadmium content of brown rice, the reduction of Cd content in brown rice in the five experimental treatments was the best in combination with the repair technology, namely silicon fertilizer combined with water management treatment (T5). Combined with carbon and water management (T6), in the water management and repair technology, the water management in the whole growth period has the best Cd effect, the highest reduction was 29.23%; in the application of conditioning agent repair technology, silicon fertilizer treatment (T3) and bamboo charcoal treatment (T4) significantly reduced rice husks and brown rice (P＜0.05). Under the silicon fertilizer treatment (T3), brown rice had the highest Cd amplitude of 49.23%; under the bamboo charcoal treatment (T4), brown rice had the highest Cd amplitude of 47.69%. In the treatment technology, the Cd content of rice brown rice could be significantly reduced. The silicon fertilizer combined with water management treatment (T5) of brown rice decreased Cd range from 60.34% to 78.46%, and bamboo charcoal combined with water management (T6) brown rice decreased Cd range from 56.90% to 67.69%. At the same time, this paper analyzed the correlation between soil available cadmium content and cadmium content in various parts of rice, and found that there was very significant positive correlation between rice grain (rice husk and brown rice) and soil available cadmium content (P＜0.01), and two rice varieties were consistent. The treatments also had the effect of reducing the enrichment coefficient of various parts of rice, and the best results were obtained by silicon fertilizer combined with water management treatment (T5) and carbon combined water management (T6). Regarding the effect of reducing the rice-to-grain transfer coefficients from different parts of the rice, the rules were inconsistent, but the transfer coefficients of the stalk sheaths and leaves to the grains (rice hulls and brown rice) were significantly reduced, except for water management (T2) treatment. In terms of rice yield, only water management treatment (T2) significantly reduced yield of Zhongjiazao17, and the other treatments did not decrease significantly. Each treatment had no significant effect on Taiyou390.【Conclusion】The combination measures were better than single water management or single conditioner treatment, and the maximum Cd drop in rice Cd-contaminated rice fields reached 78.46% when rice yield was not significantly reduced, which could further ensure the safe use of Cd-contaminated farmland.

Key words: rice, water management, cadmium, silicon fertilizer, bamboo charcoal

彭鸥,刘玉玲,铁柏清,叶长城,张淼,李园星露,周俊驰,许蒙,张燕,龙涌. 调理剂及农艺措施对污染稻田中水稻吸收镉的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(3): 574-584.

PENG Ou,LIU YuLing,TIE BaiQing,YE ChangCheng,ZHANG Miao,LI YuanXingLu,ZHOU JunChi,XU Meng,ZHANG Yan,LONG Yong. Effects of Conditioning Agents and Agronomic Measures on Cadmium Uptake by Rice in Polluted Rice Fields[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3): 574-584.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.03.010

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2020/V53/I3/574

图/表 7

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

表4

图3

参考文献 36

[1]	YI K X, WANG F, CHRN J Y, JIANG S H, HUANG S J, PENG L, ZENG QING R, LUO S. Annual input and output fluxes of heavy metals to paddy fields in four types of contaminated areas in Hunan Province, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,634:67-76.
[2]	庞荣丽, 王瑞萍, 谢汉忠, 郭琳琳, 李君 . 农业土壤中镉污染现状及污染途径分析. 天津农业科学, 2016,22(12):87-91.
	PANG R L, WANG R P, XIE H Z, GUO L L, LI J . Analysis of cadmium pollution in agricultural soils and analysis of its aay of pollution. Tianjin Agricultural Science, 2016,22(12):87-91. (in Chinese)
[3]	LI H, LUO N, LI Y W, CAI Q Y, LI H Y, MO C H, WONG M H . Cadmium in rice: transport mechanisms, influencing factors, and minimizing measures. Environmental Pollution, 2017,224:622-630.
[4]	喻华, 上官宇先, 涂仕华, 秦鱼生, 陈琨, 陈道全, 刘前聪 . 水稻籽粒中镉的来源. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(10):1940-1947.
	YU H, SHANGGUAN Y X, TU S H, QIN Y S, CHEN K, CHEN D Q, LIU Q C . Sources of cadmium accumulated in rice grain. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(10):1940-1947. (in Chinese)
[5]	MENG J, ZHONG L B, WANG L, LIU X M, TANG C X, CHEN H J, XU J M . Contrasting effects of alkaline amendments on the bioavailability and uptake of Cd in rice plants in a Cd-contaminated acid paddy soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018,25(9):8827-8835.
[6]	史磊, 郭朝晖, 梁芳, 彭驰, 肖细元, 封文利 . 水分管理和施用石灰对水稻镉吸收与运移的影响. 农业工程学报, 2017,33(24):111-117.
	SHI L, GUO Z H, LIANG F, PENG C, XIAO X Y, FENG W L . Effects of lime and water management on uptake and translocation of cadmium in rice. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(24):111-117. (in Chinese)
[7]	谢晓梅, 方至萍, 廖敏, 黄宇, 黄小辉 . 低积累水稻品种联合腐殖酸、海泡石保障重镉污染稻田安全生产的潜力. 环境科学, 2018(9):4348-4358.
	XIE X M, FANG Z P, LIAO M, HUANG Y, HUANG X H . Potential to ensure safe production from rice fields polluted with heavy cadmium by combining a rice variety with low cadmium accumulation, humic acid, and sepiolite. Environmental Science, 2018(9):4348-4358. (in Chinese)
[8]	杨小粉, 刘钦云, 袁向红, 吴勇俊, 郑海飘, 聂凌俐, 李翊君, 张文, 敖和军 . 综合降镉技术在不同污染程度稻田土壤下的应用效果研究. 中国稻米, 2018,24(2):37-41.
	YANG X F, LIU Q Y, YUAN X H, WU Y J, ZHENG H P, NIE L L, LI Y J, ZHANG W, AO H J . Effects of VIP technology on reducing cadmium under different cadmium pollution degree paddy soil. Chinese Rice, 2018,24(2):37-41. (in Chinese)
[9]	WAN Y N, CAMATA A Y, YU Y, GUO T L, ZHU L N, LI H F . Cadmium dynamics in soil pore water and uptake by rice: Influences of soil-applied selenite with different water managements. Environmental Pollution, 2018,240:523-533.
[10]	李园星露, 叶长城, 刘玉玲, 李丹阳, 刘寿涛, 罗海艳, 刘孝利, 铁柏清, 孙健 . 硅肥耦合水分管理对复合污染稻田土壤As-Cd生物有效性及稻米累积阻控. 环境科学, 2018(2):944-952.
	LI Y X L, YE C C, LIU Y L, LI D Y, LIU S T, LUO H Y, LIU X L, TIE B Q, SUN J. Bioavailability of silicon fertilizer coupled water management on soil bioavailability and cumulative control of rice in compound contaminated paddy soils. Environmental Science, 2018(2):944-952. (in Chinese)
[11]	纪雄辉, 梁永超, 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 郑圣先, 李兆军 . 污染稻田水分管理对水稻吸收积累镉的影响及其作用机理. 生态学报, 2006,27(9):3930-3939.
	JI X H, LIANG Y C, LU Y H, LIAO Y L, NIE J, ZHENG S X, LI Z J . The effect of water management on the mechanism and rate of uptake and accumulation of cadmium by rice growing in polluted paddy soil. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006,27(9):3930-3939. (in Chinese)
[12]	王梦梦, 何梦媛, 苏德纯 . 稻田土壤性质与稻米镉含量的定量关系. 环境科学, 2018,39(4):1918-1925.
	WANG M M, HE M Y, SU D C . Quantitative relationship between paddy soil properties and cadmium content in rice grains. Environmental Sciences, 2018,39(4):1918-1925. (in Chinese)
[13]	YANG Y J, CHEN J M, HUANG Q N, TANG S Q, WANG J L, HU P S, SHAO G S . Can liming reduce cadmium (Cd) accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa) in slightly acidic soils? A contradictory dynamic equilibrium between Cd uptake capacity of roots and Cd immobilisation in soils. Chemosphere, 2018,193:547-556.
[14]	SANCHEZ-FLORES N, SOLACHE M, OLGUIN M T, FRIPIAT J J, PACHECO-MALAGIN G, SANIGER J M, BULBULIAN S . Selectivity of the Cd ²+/Ca ²+ exchange on modified rice hull silica . Environmental Technology, 2009,30(3):269-275.
[15]	徐胜光, 周建民, 刘艳丽, 陈能场, 谢志宜 . 硅钙调控对酸矿水污染农田水稻镉含量的作用机制. 农业环境科学学报, 2007,26(5):1854-1859.
	XU S G, ZHOU J M, LIU Y L, CHEN N C, XIE Z Y . Regulative mechanism of silicon and calcium on the cadmium content of rice in the farmland polluted by acidic mine water. Journal of Agro- Environmental Science, 2007,26(5):1854-1859. (in Chinese)
[16]	HOU D D, WANG R Z, GAO X Y, WANG K, LIN Z, GE J, LIU T, WEI S, CHEN W K, XIE R H, YANG X E, LU L L, TIAN S K . Cultivar-specific response of bacterial community to cadmium contamination in the rhizosphere of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Pollution, 2018,241:63-73.
[17]	YONEYAMA T, GOSHO T, KATO M, GOTO S, HAYASHI H . Xylem and phloem transport of Cd, Zn and Fe into the grains of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) grown in continuously flooded Cd contaminated soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2010,56(3):445-453.
[18]	URAGUCHI S, FUJIWARA T . Rice breaks ground for cadmium-free cereals. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2013,16(3):328-334.
[19]	HAO X H, ZENG M, WANG J, ZENG Z W, DAI J L, XIE Z J, YANG Y Z, TIAN L F, CHEN L B, LI D P . A node-expressed transporter OsCCX2 is involved in grain cadmium accumulation of rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018,9:476-489.
[20]	陈江民, 杨永杰, 黄奇娜, 胡培松, 唐绍清, 吴立群, 王建龙, 邵国胜 . 持续淹水对水稻镉吸收的影响及其调控机理. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(17):3300-3310.
	CHEN J M, YANG Y J, HUANG Q N, HU P S, TANG S Q, WU L Q, WANG J L, SHAO G S . Effects of continuous flooding on cadmium absorption and its regulation mechanisms in rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(17):3300-3310. (in Chinese)
[21]	RODDA M S, REID R J . Examination of the role of iron deficiency response in the accumulation of Cd by rice grown in paddy soil with variable irrigation regimes. Plant & Soil, 2013,371(1/2):219-236.
[22]	NAKANISHI H, OGAWA I, ISHIMARU Y, MORI S, NISHIZAWA N K . Iron deficiency enhances cadmium uptake and translocation mediated by the Fe ²+ transporters OsIRT1 and OSIRT2 in rice . Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2006,52(4):464-469.
[23]	LI J, XU Y . Use of clay to remediate cadmium contaminated soil under different water management regimes. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2017,141:107-112.
[24]	杨定清, 雷绍荣, 李霞, 周娅, 罗丽卉, 李旭毅 . 大田水分管理对控制稻米镉含量的技术研究. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(18):11-16.
	YANG D Q, LEI S R, LI X, ZHOU Y, LUO L H, LI X Y . Controlling cadmium concentration in rice by field water management technology. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016,32(18):11-16. (in Chinese)
[25]	张燕, 铁柏清, 刘孝利, 张淼, 叶长城, 彭鸥, 许蒙 . 玉米秸秆生物炭对稻田土壤砷、镉形态的影响. 环境科学学报, 2018,38(2):715-721.
	ZHANG Y, TIE B Q, LIU X L, ZHANG M, YE C C, PENG O, XU M . Effects of waterlogging and application of bio-carbon from corn stalks on the physicochemical properties and the forms of arsenic and cadmium in arsenic and cadmium-contaminated soils. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2018,38(2):715-721. (in Chinese)
[26]	陈喆, 张淼, 叶长城, 毛懿德, 周细红, 雷鸣, 魏祥东, 铁柏清 . 富硅肥料和水分管理对稻米镉污染阻控效果研究. 环境科学学报, 2015,35(12):4003-4011.
	CHEN Z, ZHANG M, YE C C, MAO Y D, ZHOU X H, LEI M, WEI X D, TIE B Q . Mitigation of Cd accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with Si fertilizers and irrigation managements. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015,35(12):4003-4011. (in Chinese)
[27]	ZHANG P B, LIU Y Q, BOCHARNIKOVA E A, MATICHENKOW V V, KHOMIAKOV D M, PAKHNENKO E P . Effect of amorphous silicon dioxide on cadmium behavior in the soil-rice plant system. Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin, 2018,73(1):34-38.
[28]	YU H Y, DING X, LI F B, WANG X Q, ZHANG S R, YI J C, LIU C P, XU X H, WANG Q . The availabilities of arsenic and cadmium in rice paddy fields from a mining area: The role of soil extractable and plant silicon. Environmental Pollution, 2016,215:258-265.
[29]	GUO L, CHEN A T, HE N, YANG D, LIU M D . Exogenous silicon alleviates cadmium toxicity in rice seedlings in relation to Cd distribution and ultrastructure changes. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018,18(4):1691-1700.
[30]	徐国鑫, 王子芳, 高明, 田冬, 黄蓉, 刘江, 黎嘉成 . 秸秆与生物炭还田对土壤团聚体及固碳特征的影响. 环境科学, 2018,39(1):355-362.
	XU G X, WANG Z F, GAO M, TIAN D, HUANG R, LIU J, LI J C . Effects of straw and biochar return in soil on soil aggregate and carbon sequestration. Environmental Science, 2018,39(1):355-362. (in Chinese)
[31]	GAO J K, LV J L, WU H M, DAI Y C, NASIR M . Impacts of wheat straw addition on dissolved organic matter characteristics in cadmium- contaminated soils: Insights from fluorescence spectroscopy and environmental implications. Chemosphere, 2018,193:1027-1035.
[32]	王震宇, 刘国成, Monica Xing, 李锋民, 郑浩. 不同热解温度生物炭对Cd(Ⅱ)的吸附特性. 环境科学, 2014(12):4735-4744.
	WANG Z Y, LIU G C, MONICA X, LI F M, ZHENG H . Adsorption of Cd(Ⅱ) varies with biochars derived at different pyrolysis temperatures. Environmental Science, 2014(12):4735-4744. (in Chinese)
[33]	USMAN A, SALLAM A, ZHANG M, VITHTHIKA M, AHMAD M, AL-FARRAJ A, OK Y S, ABDULJABBAR A, AL-WABEL M . Sorption process of date palm biochar for aqueous Cd (II) removal: efficiency and mechanisms. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 2016,227(12):449-464.
[34]	张华纬, 甄华杨, 岳士忠, 张慧琦, 乔玉辉 . 水稻秸秆生物炭对污染土壤中镉生物有效性的影响. 生态环境学报, 2017,26(6):1068-1074.
	ZHANG H W, ZHEN H Y, YUE S Z, ZHANG H Q, QIAO Y H . Bioavailability of Cd in contaminated soil after short-term application of rice straw biochar. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2017,26(6):1068-1074. (in Chinese)
[35]	李超, 艾绍英, 唐明灯, 李林峰, 王艳红, 李义纯 . 矿物调理剂对稻田土壤镉形态和水稻镉吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(11):2143-2154.
	LI C, AI S Y, TANG M D, LI L F, WANG Y H, LI Y C . Effects of a mineral conditioner on the forms of Cd in paddy soil and Cd uptake by rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(11):2143-2154. (in Chinese)
[36]	周静, 杨洋, 孟桂元, 马国辉, 陈艳艳 . 不同镉污染土壤下水稻镉富集与转运效率. 生态学杂志, 2018,37(1):89-94.
	ZHOU J, YANG Y, MENG G Y, MA G H, CHEN Y Y . Cadmium accumulation and translocation efficiency of rice under different cadmium-polluted soils. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018,37(1):89-94. (in Chinese)

处理 Treatment	土壤Cd含量 Soil Cd concentration (mg·kg^-1)	早稻土壤有效态Cd含量 Soil available Cd concentration in early rice (mg·kg^-1)	晚稻土壤有效态Cd含量 Soil available Cd content in late rice (mg·kg^-1)
T1	1.52±0.21a	1.17±0.13ab	1.15±0.07a
T2	1.47±0.15a	1.19±0.16a	1.05±0.08a
T3	1.47±0.14a	0.97±0.15ab	0.94±0.08ab
T4	1.43±0.16a	0.92±0.11b	0.99±0.09ab
T5	1.51±0.06a	0.96±0.14ab	0.80±0.06c
T6	1.54±0.08a	0.91±0.13b	0.89±0.03bc

品种Variety	部位Organ	拟合公式Fitting formula	拟合度R-squared	相关系数Correlation coefficient
中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17	根系 Root	y = 12.1070x - 2.9678	R² = 0.8457	r=0.551*
	茎鞘 Stem-sheath	y = 3.1702x + 0.1614	R² = 0.4864	r=0.339
	叶片 Leaf	y = 0.9363x - 0.3450	R² = 0.5852	r=0.590*
	稻壳 Rice husk	y = 0.8912x - 0.4040	R² = 0.7274	r=0.853**
	糙米 Brown rice	y = 0.7232x - 0.3660	R² = 0.7063	r=0.840**
泰优390 Taiyou 390	根系 Root	y = 8.5009x + 2.6206	R² = 0.2303	r=0.480*
	茎鞘 Stem-sheath	y = 3.9923x + 2.1199	R² = 0.2296	r=0.479*
	叶片 Leaf	y = 0.4759x + 0.7394	R² = 0.0478	r=0.219
	稻壳 Rice husk	y = 0.9209x - 0.4151	R² = 0.4199	r=0.648**
	糙米 Brown rice	y = 1.1700x - 0.7611	R² = 0.4564	r=0.676**

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	根系/土壤 Root/Soil	茎鞘/土壤 Stem-sheath/Soil	叶片/土壤 Leaf/ Soil	稻壳/土壤 Rice husk/ Soil	糙米/土壤 Brown rice/ Soil
中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17	T1	7.87±0.62a	2.85±0.39a	0.93±0.04a	0.52±0.00a	0.38±0.00a
	T2	7.32±0.64a	2.09±0.20b	0.83±0.09ab	0.38±0.08b	0.31±0.06b
	T3	5.57±0.19b	2.19±0.38b	0.69±0.13b	0.28±0.04c	0.24±0.03c
	T4	6.21±0.50b	2.41±0.00ab	0.79±0.03ab	0.31±0.04bc	0.25±0.04bc
	T5	5.13±0.75b	2.07±0.08b	0.74±0.20ab	0.24±0.04c	0.15±0.02d
	T6	5.49±0.69b	1.98±0.19b	0.80±0.02ab	0.28±0.02c	0.16±0.00d
泰优390 Taiyou 390	T1	8.40±0.08a	4.80±0.19a	0.93±0.04a	0.49±0.01a	0.42±0.05a
	T2	8.27±0.12a	4.11±0.13b	0.83±0.09ab	0.36±0.00b	0.31±0.01b
	T3	6.24±0.86c	3.94±0.03b	0.69±0.13b	0.26±0.03d	0.22±0.04c
	T4	7.54±0.28ab	3.90±0.18b	0.79±0.03ab	0.32±0.01c	0.23±0.05c
	T5	6.00±0.79c	3.26±0.54c	0.74±0.20ab	0.22±0.02e	0.09±0.03d
	T6	6.68±0.18bc	3.87±0.14b	0.80±0.02ab	0.23±0.02de	0.13±0.05d

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	根系/茎鞘 Root/ Stem-sheath	茎鞘/叶片 Stem-sheath/ Leaf	茎鞘/稻壳 Stem-sheath/ Rice husk	茎鞘/糙米 Stem-sheath/ Brown rice	叶片/稻壳 Leaf/ Rice husk	叶片/糙米 Stem-sheath / Brown rice
中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17	T1	0.36±0.02a	0.33±0.03bc	0.18±0.03a	0.14±0.02a	0.56±0.03a	0.41±0.02a
	T2	0.29±0.00b	0.40±0.01ab	0.18±0.02a	0.15±0.02a	0.46±0.05b	0.37±0.04ab
	T3	0.39±0.06a	0.32±0.00c	0.13±0.00b	0.11±0.00b	0.41±0.02bc	0.34±0.02b
	T4	0.39±0.03a	0.33±0.01bc	0.13±0.02b	0.10±0.01b	0.40±0.07bc	0.32±0.05b
	T5	0.41±0.05a	0.35±0.08abc	0.12±0.01b	0.07±0.01c	0.34±0.04c	0.21±0.03c
	T6	0.36±0.01a	0.41±0.03a	0.14±0.00db	0.08±0.01bc	0.35±0.02c	0.20±0.00c
泰优390 Taiyou 390	T1	0.57±0.03abc	0.19±0.02ab	0.10±0.01a	0.09±0.01a	0.52±0.01a	0.45±0.03a
	T2	0.50±0.01c	0.20±0.02ab	0.09±0.00b	0.08±0.00ab	0.44±0.05b	0.38±0.03b
	T3	0.64±0.09a	0.18±0.03b	0.07±0.01c	0.06±0.01bc	0.37±0.02b	0.32±0.00bc
	T4	0.52±0.04bc	0.20±0.00ab	0.08±0.00b	0.06±0.02bc	0.40±0.00b	0.30±0.07c
	T5	0.54±0.02bc	0.22±0.02a	0.07±0.01c	0.03±0.00d	0.31±0.06c	0.12±0.01d
	T6	0.58±0.00ab	0.21±0.01ab	0.06±0.01c	0.04±0.01cd	0.28±0.02c	0.17±0.05d

调理剂及农艺措施对污染稻田中水稻吸收镉的影响

Effects of Conditioning Agents and Agronomic Measures on Cadmium Uptake by Rice in Polluted Rice Fields

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	肖德顺, 徐春梅, 王丹英, 章秀福, 陈松, 褚光, 刘元辉. 水培条件下根际氧环境对水稻幼苗磷吸收的影响及其生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 236-248.
[2]	张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[3]	桑世飞,曹梦雨,王亚男,王君怡,孙晓涵,张文玲,姬生栋. 水稻氮高效相关基因的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1479-1491.
[4]	韩晓彤,杨保军,李苏炫,廖福兵,刘淑华,唐健,姚青. 基于图像的水稻纹枯病智能测报方法[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1557-1567.
[5]	赵凌, 张勇, 魏晓东, 梁文化, 赵春芳, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 王才林, 张亚东. 利用高密度Bin图谱定位水稻抽穗期剑叶叶绿素含量QTL[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 825-836.
[6]	蒋晶晶,周天阳,韦陈华,邬佳宁,张耗,刘立军,王志琴,顾骏飞,杨建昌. 不同栽培措施对超级稻强、弱势粒品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 874-889.
[7]	张亚玲, 高清, 赵羽涵, 刘瑞, 付忠举, 李雪, 孙宇佳, 靳学慧. 黑龙江省水稻种质稻瘟病抗性评价及抗瘟基因结构分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 625-640.
[8]	陈婷婷, 符卫蒙, 余景, 奉保华, 李光彦, 符冠富, 陶龙兴. 彩色稻叶片光合特征及其与抗氧化酶活性、花青素含量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 467-478.
[9]	赫磊,路凯,赵春芳,姚姝,周丽慧,赵凌,陈涛,朱镇,赵庆勇,梁文化,王才林,朱丽,张亚东. 水稻穗顶端退化突变体paa21的表型分析及基因克隆[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4781-4792.
[10]	杜文婷,雷肖肖,卢慧宇,王云凤,徐佳星,罗彩霞,张树兰. 氮肥减量施用对我国三大粮食作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4863-4878.
[11]	赵春芳,赵庆勇,吕远大,陈涛,姚姝,赵凌,周丽慧,梁文化,朱镇,王才林,张亚东. 半糯粳稻品种核心标记的筛选及DNA指纹图谱的构建[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4567-4582.
[12]	刘淑军,李冬初,黄晶,刘立生,吴丁,李照全,吴远帆,张会民. 水稻油菜轮作下稻草还田和钾肥对土壤团聚体及钾素分布的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4651-4663.
[13]	刘进,胡佳晓,马小定,陈武,勒思,Jo Sumin,崔迪,周慧颖,张立娜,Shin Dongjin,黎毛毛,韩龙植,余丽琴. 水稻RIL群体高密度遗传图谱的构建及苗期耐热性QTL定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4327-4341.
[14]	万华琴,辜旭,何红梅,汤逸帆,申建华,韩建刚,朱咏莉. 沼液中HCO₃^-对水稻生长的类CO₂施肥效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4445-4457.
[15]	逄洪波, 程露, 于茗兰, 陈强, 李玥莹, 吴隆坤, 王泽, 潘孝武, 郑晓明. 栽培稻芽期耐低温全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4091-4103.