中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 1205-1214.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.008
杜玉琼1,张立峰1,2,姚兆磊1,张继宗1,2,刘玉华1,2()
收稿日期:
2018-11-15
接受日期:
2019-01-21
出版日期:
2019-04-01
发布日期:
2019-04-04
通讯作者:
刘玉华
作者简介:
杜玉琼,E-mail: 基金资助:
DU YuQiong1,ZHANG LiFeng1,2,YAO ZhaoLei1,ZHANG JiZong1,2,LIU YuHua1,2()
Received:
2018-11-15
Accepted:
2019-01-21
Online:
2019-04-01
Published:
2019-04-04
Contact:
YuHua LIU
摘要:
【目的】促进水温土等资源匮乏的冀西北寒旱区作物生产对水分、养分的合理与均衡利用,保护农田生态环境。【方法】采用交叉式种植方法,在草甸栗钙土和砂质栗土农田,分别设计了包括5个主栽作物的全部组合的轮作与连作田区试验,年际间进行重复,研究区域主栽作物轮作倒茬的产量效果。【结果】在草甸栗钙土农田,与连作相比,不同前茬马铃薯、甜菜、莜麦的产量分别提高了58%—94%、28%—53%和16%—70%;蚕豆与连作相比,除甜菜茬减产外,其他茬口较连作增产4%—43%;马铃薯、蚕豆茬玉米较连作分别增产12%、5%,甜菜、莜麦茬玉米产量仅为连作的81%、93%。在砂质栗钙土农田,不同前茬马铃薯、甜菜的产量分别较连作提高了5%—36%、13%—36%;甜菜茬谷子表现减产,其他茬口的谷子较连作提高了5%—30%;谷子茬莜麦减产,其他茬口莜麦较连作提高了9%—15%;马铃薯、莜麦茬亚麻较连作增产5%、8%,谷子、甜菜茬亚麻产量为连作的94%、99%。【结论】草甸栗钙土田马铃薯→莜麦、马铃薯→甜菜呈现互利轮作,玉米茬马铃薯、莜麦茬甜菜、蚕豆茬甜菜、玉米茬甜菜和蚕豆茬马铃薯表现偏利轮作;砂质栗钙土田莜麦茬马铃薯、马铃薯茬甜菜2种方式表现偏利轮作,可资生产应用。
杜玉琼,张立峰,姚兆磊,张继宗,刘玉华. 冀西北寒旱区农田作物轮作产量效应评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(7): 1205-1214.
DU YuQiong,ZHANG LiFeng,YAO ZhaoLei,ZHANG JiZong,LIU YuHua. Evaluation of Crop Rotation Yield Effect in Cold and Arid Regions of Northwest Hebei Province[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1205-1214.
表1
各轮作试验采用作物及其施肥量、播种和收获期"
土壤类型 Soil type | 作物 Crops | 施肥量 Fertilizing amount (kg·hm-2) | 播种和收获期Sowing and harvesting date (M-D) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||||
N | P | 播种 Sowing | 收获 Harvesting | 播种 Sowing | 收获 Harvesting | 播种 Sowing | 收获 Harvesting | ||||
草甸栗钙土 Meadow chestnut soil | 马铃薯Potato | 213.74 | 55.94 | 05-02 | 08-25 | 04-25 | 09-16 | 04-28 | 09-12 | ||
蚕豆Faba bean | 208.12 | 46.91 | 05-04 | 08-24 | 05-19 | 08-26 | 05-15 | 09-09 | |||
玉米Forage maize | 321.97 | 46.91 | 05-22 | 08-26 | 05-19 | 09-11 | 05-15 | 09-15 | |||
莜麦Oat | 242.91 | 25.67 | 05-21 | 09-03 | 05-25 | 09-08 | 05-23 | 09-01 | |||
甜菜Beet | 267.88 | 70.16 | 05-25 | 10-01 | 05-27 | 10-01 | 05-29 | 10-03 | |||
砂质栗钙土 Sandy chestnut soil | 马铃薯Potato | 161.05 | 42.19 | 05-01 | 08-27 | 04-25 | 09-15 | 04-26 | 09-11 | ||
亚麻Flax | 64.31 | 18.95 | 05-22 | 08-28 | 05-20 | 09-01 | 05-23 | 08-28 | |||
谷子Forage millet | 257.35 | 37.44 | 05-29 | 09-22 | 05-10 | 09-12 | 05-18 | 09-14 | |||
莜麦Oat | 244.54 | 40.24 | 05-21 | 09-07 | 05-25 | 09-07 | 05-23 | 08-31 | |||
甜菜Beet | 213.80 | 55.98 | 05-24 | 09-30 | 05-27 | 10-02 | 04-26 | 09-11 |
表2
试验设计与试验区作物种植"
试验小区 Experimental plot | 草甸栗钙土田Meadow chestnut soil field | 砂质栗钙土田Sandy chestnut soil field | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |
1 | B | P | B | P | B | P | B | P |
2 | O | P | O | P | O | P | O | P |
3 | FM | P | FM | P | M | P | M | P |
4 | FB | P | FB | P | F | P | F | P |
5 | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P |
6 | B | FB | B | FB | B | F | B | F |
7 | O | FB | O | FB | O | F | O | F |
8 | FM | FB | FM | FB | M | F | M | F |
9 | FB | FB | FB | FB | F | F | F | F |
10 | P | FB | P | FB | P | F | P | F |
11 | B | FM | B | FM | B | M | B | M |
12 | O | FM | O | FM | O | M | O | M |
13 | FM | FM | FM | FM | M | M | M | M |
14 | FB | FM | FB | FM | F | M | F | M |
15 | P | FM | P | FM | P | M | P | M |
16 | B | O | B | O | B | O | B | O |
17 | O | O | O | O | O | O | O | O |
18 | FM | O | FM | O | M | O | M | O |
19 | FB | O | FB | O | F | O | F | O |
20 | P | O | P | O | P | O | P | O |
21 | B | B | B | B | B | B | B | B |
22 | O | B | O | B | O | B | O | B |
23 | FM | B | FM | B | M | B | M | B |
24 | FB | B | FB | B | F | B | F | B |
25 | P | B | P | B | P | B | P | B |
表3
2016-2018年草甸栗钙土农田不同前茬的各作物平均经济产量"
后茬作物 Succeeding crop | 前茬作物Previous crop | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
马铃薯Potato | 蚕豆Faba bean | 玉米Forage maize | 莜麦Oat | 甜菜Beet | |
马铃薯Potato | 2852.34±739.97aA | 4511.95±992.87bAB | 5071.08±1399.53bB | 5532.83±1174.21bB | 4541.19±1356.91bAB |
蚕豆Faba bean | 1741.89±465.88abA | 1583.96±191.93abA | 2259.55±1029.6bA | 1647.64±190.78abA | 1338.10±420.28aA |
玉米Forage maize | 17042.13±3180.76aA | 15943.61±1593.10aA | 15221.82±2753.93aA | 14228.26±3259.53aA | 12400.59±4496.71aA |
莜麦Oat | 2615.22±536.36bB | 2250.27±351.03abAB | 2200.68±445.65abAB | 1541.59±409.38aA | 1788.30±662.93aAB |
甜菜Beet | 11007.97±1535.99cB | 10076.49±789.28cB | 10107.38±1316.53cB | 9181.86±386.43bB | 7187.91±1205.40aA |
表4
2016—2018年砂质栗钙土农田不同前茬各作物的平均经济产量"
后茬作物 Succeeding crop | 前茬作物Previous crop | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
马铃薯Potato | 亚麻Flax | 谷子Forage millet | 莜麦Oat | 甜菜Beet | |
马铃薯Potato | 3112.98±590.53aA | 4010.72±930.10abAB | 3773.71±550.18abAB | 4318.84±725.18bB | 3970.45±280.77abAB |
亚麻Flax | 1289.42±138.85aA | 1225.87±158.33aA | 1157.65±169.49aA | 1325.84±207.95aA | 1211.34±79.68aA |
谷子Forage millet | 7746.90±2732.56aA | 7186.10±2696.62aA | 5947.81±1165.48aA | 6225.64±1257.66aA | 5930.60±1796.59aA |
莜麦Oat | 2001.59±766.46aA | 1890.33±677.62aA | 1639.54±461.51aA | 1734.93±732.97aA | 1978.40±522.85aA |
甜菜Beet | 8666.19±2134.00 bA | 7825.86±457.90abA | 7214.63±981.98abA | 7700.16±1252.81abA | 6367.97±1655.00aA |
表5
草甸栗钙土农田不同作物轮作茬口关系效应"
作物 Crop | 马铃薯茬 Stubble of potato | 蚕豆茬 Stubble of faba bean | 玉米茬 Stubble of forage maize | 莜麦茬 Stubble of oat | 甜菜茬 Stubble of beet | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | |
马铃薯 Potato | 1.00 | CK | 1.58 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.78 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.94 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.59 | + | 偏利Commensalism | |
蚕豆 Faba bean | 1.10 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.00 | CK | 1.43 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.04 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 0.84 | - | 偏害Amensalism | |
玉米 Forage maize | 1.12 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.05 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.00 | CK | 0.93 | - | 偏害Amensalism | 0.81 | - | 偏害Amensalism | |
莜麦 Oat | 1.70 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.46 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.43 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.00 | CK | 1.16 | + | 偏利Commensalism | |
甜菜 Beet | 1.53 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.40 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.41 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.28 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.00 | CK |
表6
砂质栗钙土农田不同作物轮作茬口关系效应"
作物 Crops | 马铃薯茬 Stubble of potato | 亚麻茬 Stubble of flax | 谷子茬 Stubble of forage millet | 莜麦茬 Stubble of oat | 甜菜茬 Stubble of beet | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | 比值 Ratio | 效应 Effect | 类型 Type | |
马铃薯 Potato | 1.00 | CK | 1.29 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.21 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.39 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.28 | + | 偏利Commensalism | |
亚麻 Flax | 1.05 | + | 偏利 Commensalism | 1.00 | CK | 0.94 | - | 偏害Amensalism | 1.08 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 0.99 | - | 偏害Amensalism | |
谷子 Forage millet | 1.30 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.21 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.00 | CK | 1.05 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.00 | 0 | 中性 Neutal interaction | |
莜麦 Oat | 1.15 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.09 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 0.95 | - | 偏害Amensalism | 1.00 | CK | 1.14 | + | 偏利Commensalism | |
甜菜 Beet | 1.36 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.23 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.13 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.21 | + | 偏利Commensalism | 1.00 | CK |
表7
冀西北寒旱区不同类型农田的轮作组合效应"
土壤类型 Soil type | 轮作类型Rotation patterns | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
互利轮作(++) Positive interaction rotation(++) | 偏利轮作(+) Commensalism rotation (+) | 中性轮作(0) Neutral interaction rotation(0) | 偏害轮作(-) Amensalism rotation (-) | 互害轮作 (--) Negative interaction rotation(--) | |
草甸栗钙土 Meadow chestnut soil | 马铃薯→蚕豆 Potato →faba bean 马铃薯→莜麦 Potato →oat 马铃薯→甜菜 Potato →beet 马铃薯→玉米 Potato →forage maize 蚕豆→玉米 Faba bean →forage maize 蚕豆→莜麦 Faba bean →oat 莜麦→甜菜 Oat →beet | 蚕豆茬甜菜 Beet after faba bean 玉米茬莜麦 Oat after forage maize 玉米茬甜菜 Beet after forage maize | 无 Nil | 甜菜茬蚕豆 Faba bean after beet 莜麦茬玉米 Forage maize after oat 甜菜茬玉米 Forage maize after beet | 无 Nil |
砂质栗钙土 Sandy chestnut soil | 马铃薯→莜麦 Potato →oat 马玲薯→亚麻 Potato →flax 马铃薯→谷子 Potato →forage millet 马铃薯→甜菜 Potato →beet 莜麦→亚麻 Oat →flax 甜菜→莜麦 Beet →oat | 谷子茬甜菜 Beet after forage millet 亚麻茬谷子 Forage millet after flax 莜麦茬谷子 Forage millet after oat 亚麻茬甜菜 Beet after flax | 甜菜茬谷子 Forage millet after beet | 谷子茬亚麻 Flax after foragemillet 谷子茬莜麦 Oat after forage millet 甜菜茬亚麻 Flax after beet | 无 Nil |
[1] |
张立峰, 徐长金 . 北方高寒半干旱农牧交错带资源环境障碍与农牧生产力开发. 资源科学, 1999,21(5):64-67.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.1999.05.011 |
ZHANG L F, XU C J . Environmental problems and development of agropastoral productivity in ecotone between agriculture and animal husbandry in cold semiarid areas in northern China. Resources Science, 1999,21(5):64-67. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.1999.05.011 |
|
[2] |
刘沛松, 贾志宽, 李军, 李永平, 刘世新 . 宁南旱区草粮轮作系统中紫花苜蓿适宜利用年限研究. 草业学报, 2008,17(3):31-39.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2008.03.005 |
LIU P S, JIA Z K, LI J, LI Y P, LIU S X . A study on optimal duration of Medicago sativa growth in M. sativa-grain crop rotation system in arid region of southern Ningxia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008,17(3):31-39. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2008.03.005 |
|
[3] |
韩丽娜, 丁静, 韩清芳, 丁瑞霞, 聂俊峰, 贾志宽, 李文静 . 黄土高原区草粮(油)翻耕轮作的土壤水分及作物产量效应. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(24):129-137.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.24.019 |
HAN L N, DING J, HAN Q F, DING R X, NIE J F, JIA Z K, LI W J . Effects of alfalfa-grain (oil) crop plowing rotation on soil moisture and crop yield in Loess Plateau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agriculture Engineering, 2012,28(24):129-137. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.24.019 |
|
[4] | 山仑, 刘忠民, 辛业全, 邓西平, 马国忠 . 宁夏山区草田轮作研究——Ⅰ不同轮作方式的生产力及效益. 水土保持学报, 1992,6(4):60-68. |
SHAN L, LIU Z M, XIN Y Q, DENG X P, MA G Z . A study on the grass and field crops rotation in mountain region of southern Ningxia. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1992,6(4):60-68. (in Chinese) | |
[5] |
鲁鸿佩, 孙爱华 . 草田轮作对粮食作物的增产效应. 草业科学, 2003,20(4):10-13.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2003.04.004 |
LU H P, SUN A H . The effect of grass crop rotation on crop yield increase. Pratacultural Science, 2003,20(4):10-13. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2003.04.004 |
|
[6] | 陈海江, 司伟, 魏丹, 李玉梅 . 粮豆轮作技术的“减肥增效”效应研究——基于东北地区轮作定位试验和农户调研分析. 大豆科学, 2018,37(4):545-550. |
CHEN H J, SI W, WEI D, LI Y M . Study on the effect of reducing fertilizer input and increasing efficiency of grain-soybean rotation technology: Based on the rotation location experiment and the analysis household survey in northeast China. Soybean Science, 2018,37(4):545-550. (in Chinese) | |
[7] |
CROOKSTON R K, KUELE J E, COPELAND P J, FORD J H, LUESCHEN W E . Rotation cropping sequence affects yield of corn of soybean. Agronomy Journal, 1991,83(1):108-113.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300010026x |
[8] |
杨宁, 赵护兵, 王朝辉, 张达斌, 高亚军 . 豆科作物-小麦轮作方式下旱地小麦花后干物质及养分累积、转移与产量的关系. 生态学报, 2012,32(15):4827-4835.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201107221085 |
YANG N, ZHAO H B, WANG Z H, ZHANG D B, GAO Y J . Accumulation and translocation of dry matter and nutrients of wheat rotated with legumes and its relation to grain yield in a dryland area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(15):4827-4835. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201107221085 |
|
[9] | 宋树慧 . 不同前茬对马铃薯生育及土壤特性的影响[D]. 内蒙古: 内蒙古农业大学, 2014. |
SONG S H . Effects of different preceding crops on growth and soil properties of potato[D]. Inner Mongolia: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2014. ( in Chinese) | |
[10] | 高盼, 刘玉涛, 王宇先, 杨慧莹, 徐莹莹, 王俊河, 徐婷 . 半干旱区玉米-大豆轮作对土壤物理性质和化学性质的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2018(9):23-26. |
GAO P, LIU Y T, WANG Y X, YANG H Y, XU Y Y, WANG J H, XU T . Effects of maize soybean rotation on physical and chemical properties of soil in semi-arid area. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018(9):23-26. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 惠言 . 华北平原以豆科为基础的轮作方式对农作物产量和土壤理化性质的影响[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2017. |
HUI Y . Crop yields and soil physiochemical properties in response to legume-based cropping rotation in North China Plain[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2017. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 李梅峰, 李元华, 程明军, 王厚军, 严东海 . 青贮饲用玉米与黑麦草稻田轮作的经济效益分析. 四川畜牧兽医, 2018,45(6):12-13. |
LI M F, LI Y H, CHENG M J, WANG H J, YAN D H . Economic benefit analysis of silage corn and ryegrass paddy rotation. Sichuan Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 2018,45(6):12-13. (in Chinese) | |
[13] |
吴艳飞, 张雪艳, 李元, 魏文杰, 高丽红 . 轮作对黄瓜连作土壤环境和产量的影响. 园艺学报, 2008,35(3):357-362.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2008.03.007 |
WU Y F, ZHANG X Y, LI Y, WEI W J, GAO L H . Influence of rotation on continuous cropping soil environment and cucumber yield. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008,35(3):357-362. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2008.03.007 |
|
[14] |
WILLEY R W, OSIRU D S O . Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1972,79:517-529.
doi: 10.1017/S0021859600025909 |
[15] |
REDDY M S, WILLEY R W . Growth and resource use studies in intercrop of pearl millet groundnut. Field Crops Research, 1981,4:13-24.
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(81)90050-2 |
[16] | 刘巽浩 . 耕作学. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1994: 117-120. |
LIU X H . Farming System. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1994: 117-120. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 刘玉华, 张立峰, 边秀举 . 土地当量比计算方法的改进与应用. 河北农业大学学报, 1999,22(2):19-21. |
LIU Y H, ZHANG L F, BIAN X J . Improvement and application of calculating method of land equivalent ratio. Journal of Agriculture University of Hebei, 1999,22(2):19-21. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 刘玉华 . 大田作物轮作效果定量评价研究. 沈阳农业大学学报(自然科学版), 1999,30(1):13-15. |
LIU Y H . Studies on effects of quantitative evaluation of crop rotation. Natural Science Journal of Shenyang Agriculture University, 1999, 30(1):13-15. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 刘玉华, 张立峰, 边秀举 . 土地当量比的实质及应用分析. 耕作与栽培, 1999(4):64-65. |
LIU Y H, ZHANG L F, BIAN X J . Essence and application analysis of land equivalent ratio. Tillage and Cultivation, 1999(4):64-65. (in Chinese). | |
[20] | 刘玉华, 张立峰 . 土地当量比和复种指数的应用研究. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1998,29(3):24-27. |
LIU Y H, ZHANG L F . Application of land equivalent ratio (LER) on sequential cropping. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 1998,29(3):24-27. (in Chinese) | |
[21] |
张立峰, 边秀举, 刘玉华 . 冀北高原作物耗水特性与倒茬效应研究. 中国农业科学, 2001,34(1):56-60.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2001.01.011 |
ZHANG L F, BIAN X J, LIU Y H . Studies on water consumption characteristics and effects of crops rotation in plateau of north Hebei province. Sciencia Agriculture Sinica, 2001,34(1):56-60. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2001.01.011 |
|
[22] |
刘玉华, 张立峰 . 不同作物种植方式产出效果的定量评价. 中国农业科学, 2005,38(4):709-713.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2005.04.011 |
LIU Y H, ZHANG L F . Quantitative evaluation of output efficiency in different cropping patterns. Scientia Agriculture Sinica, 2005,38(4):709-713. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2005.04.011 |
|
[23] |
刘玉华, 张立峰 . 不同种植方式土地利用效率的定量评价. 中国农业科学, 2006,39(1):57-60.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2006.01.008 |
LIU Y H, ZHANG L F . Quantitative evaluation of landuse efficiency under different cropping patterns. Scientia Agriculture Sinica, 2006,39(1):57-60. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2006.01.008 |
|
[24] | 陈阜 . 农业生态学. 2版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011: 77-78. |
CHEN F . Agricultural Ecology.2nd edtion. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011: 77-78. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 崔婷茹 . 坝上地区农业气候资源特征及高效利用策略[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2017. |
CUI T R . Characteristics of agricultural climatic resources and effective utilization strategy in Bashang area[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2017. ( in Chinese) | |
[26] | 宋树慧, 何梦麟, 任少勇, 肖强, 蒙美莲, 陈有君, 杨丽辉, 魏翠果 . 不同前茬对马铃薯产量、品质和病害发生的影响. 作物杂志, 2014(2):123-126. |
SONG S H, HE M L, REN S Y, XIAO Q, MENG M L, CHEN Y J, YANG L H, WEI C G . Effect of different preceding crops on yield, quality and disease of potato. Crops, 2014(2):123-126. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 谢奎忠, 陆立银, 罗爱花, 胡新元 . 长期连作对马铃薯土传病害和产量的影响. 中国种业, 2018(2):65-67. |
XIE K Z, LU L Y, LUO A H, HU X Y . Effects of long-term continuous cropping on soil-borne diseases and yield of potato. China Seed Industry, 2018(2):65-67. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 谭雪莲, 郭晓冬, 马明生, 刘高远, 张平良, 吕军峰, 郭天文 . 连作对马铃薯土壤微生物区系和产量的影响. 核农学报, 2012,26(9):1322-1325, 1321. |
TAN X L, GUO X D, MA M S, LIU G Y, ZHANG P L, LÜ J F, GUO T W . Effects of continuous cropping on soil, microflora and yield of potato. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2012,26(9):1322-1325, 1321. (in Chinese) | |
[29] | 李国庆 . 马铃薯连作障碍的土壤微生态研究进展//马铃薯产业与农村区域发展. 中国作物学会马铃薯专业委员会, 2013: 5. |
LI G Q . Advances in soil micro ecology of potato continuous cropping obstacles//Potato Industry and Rural Development. China Crop Society Potato Professional Committee, 2013: 5. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 梁烜赫 . 种植马铃薯必须轮作倒茬. 吉林农村报, 2018-01-26(003). |
LIANG X H . Potatoes must be grown in rotation. Jilin Rural Newspaper, 2018-01-26(003). (in Chinese) | |
[31] |
张伟, 张冬梅, 韩彦龙, 刘化涛, 赵聪, 姜春霞, 李娜娜 . 不同前茬下旱地玉米的水分动态及产量效应. 山西农业科学, 2017,45(5):749-752, 781.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2017.05.20 |
ZHANG W, ZHANG D M, HAN Y L, LIU H T, ZHAO C, JIANG C X, LI N N . Effects of different previous crops on soil moisture and crop yield of maize in dryland. Journal of Shanxi Agriculture Sciences, 2017, 45(5):749-752, 781. (in Chinese).
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2017.05.20 |
|
[32] |
赵祥 . 河北坝上地区不同前作对青贮玉米产量的影响. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2012,28(3):31-32, 37.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1492.2012.03.011 |
ZHAO X . Effect of different pre-cropping on yield of silage maize in Bashang area of Hebei province. Journal of Hebei North University (Natural Science Edition), 2012,28(3):31-32, 37. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1492.2012.03.011 |
[1] | 张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263. |
[2] | 严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299. |
[3] | 徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313. |
[4] | 王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16. |
[5] | 赵政鑫,王晓云,田雅洁,王锐,彭青,蔡焕杰. 未来气候条件下秸秆还田和氮肥种类对夏玉米产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 104-117. |
[6] | 张玮,严玲玲,傅志强,徐莹,郭慧娟,周梦瑶,龙攀. 播期对湖南省双季稻产量和光热资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 31-45. |
[7] | 熊伟仡,徐开未,刘明鹏,肖华,裴丽珍,彭丹丹,陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748. |
[8] | 李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762. |
[9] | 王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810. |
[10] | 桂润飞,王在满,潘圣刚,张明华,唐湘如,莫钊文. 香稻分蘖期减氮侧深施液体肥对产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545. |
[11] | 廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,黄山,曾勇军,张洪程. 杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556. |
[12] | 李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616. |
[13] | 秦羽青,程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺. 中国北方地区小麦覆盖栽培增产效应的荟萃(Meta)分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109. |
[14] | 谭先明,张佳伟,王仲林,谌俊旭,杨峰,杨文钰. 基于PLS的不同水氮条件下带状套作玉米产量预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138. |
[15] | 冯宣军, 潘立腾, 熊浩, 汪青军, 李静威, 张雪梅, 胡尔良, 林海建, 郑洪建, 卢艳丽. 南方地区120份甜、糯玉米自交系重要目标性状和育种潜力分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 856-873. |
|