中国农业科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (10): 1972-1981.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.016
韩晓(), 王海波, 王孝娣, 冀晓昊, 史祥宾, 王宝亮, 郑晓翠, 王志强, 刘凤之()
收稿日期:
2017-09-27
接受日期:
2017-11-23
出版日期:
2018-05-16
发布日期:
2018-05-16
联系方式:
联系方式:韩晓,Tel:18698905061;E-mail:hanxiaoke55@126.com。
基金资助:
Xiao HAN(), HaiBo WANG, XiaoDi WANG, XiaoHao JI, XiangBin SHI, BaoLiang WANG, XiaoCui ZHENG, ZhiQiang WANG, FengZhi LIU()
Received:
2017-09-27
Accepted:
2017-11-23
Published:
2018-05-16
Online:
2018-05-16
摘要:
目的 评价贝达、1103P、3309C、140Ru、5C、SO4、华葡1号、抗砧1等8种不同砧木对‘87-1’葡萄光合特性和叶绿素荧光特性的影响,为筛选适宜设施栽培的砧木提供理论基础。方法 通过Li-6400光合仪测定光响应曲线(设定CO2浓度为400 μmol·mol-1,温度为25℃,气体流速为500 mmol·s-1。设定光合有效辐射按照由强到弱的顺序分别为2 000、1 800、1 500、1 200、800、400、200、100、50、20、0 μmol·m-2·s-1)、CO2响应曲线(设定光合有效辐射为1 200 μmol·m-2·s-1,温度和气体流速分别设为25℃和500 mmol·s-1。CO2浓度按照400、200、100、50、20、400、400、800、1 200、1 500、1 800、2 000 μmol·mol-1的顺序进行测定)、温度响应曲线(设定光合有效辐射为1 200 μmol·m-2·s-1,CO2浓度控制为400 μmol·mol-1,气体流速为500 mmol·s-1。温度按照由小到大的顺序设定为25、27、30、32、35和37℃),通过3条曲线分别求光补偿点、表观量子效率、暗呼吸效率、羧化效率、CO2补偿点、不同温度下净光合速率等参数,通过FMS-2型便携脉冲调制式荧光仪测定叶绿素荧光F0、Fm、Fv、Fv/F0、Fv/Fm等参数,比较不同砧木对‘87-1’各光合参数的影响,并通过Topsis综合评价法进行排名。结果 ‘87-1’/3309C、‘87-1’/1103P组合表观量子效率高,光补偿点低,暗呼吸速率较低,Topsis综合排名位于前2名,两者耐弱光能力较强。‘87-1’/3309C、‘87-1’/华葡1号羧化效率较高,CO2补偿点低,Topsis综合排名位于前2名,两者耐低浓度CO2能力较强。‘87-1’/SO4、‘87-1’/华葡1号不同温度下净光合变化值较小,高温下净光合速率较大,Topsis综合排名位于前2名,说明两者耐高温能力较强。通过方差分析发现‘87-1’/140Ru和‘87-1’/SO4组合F0最高,‘87-1’/1103P组合Fv最高,‘87-1’/1103P和‘87-1’/3309C的Fv/F0值最高,8个砧穗组合的Fm和Fv/Fm无显著性差异。结论 3309C、1103P两种砧木可以有效提高‘87-1’耐弱光能力及原初光能转化效率,3309C、华葡1号两种砧木可以提高‘87-1’的耐低浓度CO2能力,SO4、华葡1号2种砧木可以提高‘87-1’的耐高温能力。
韩晓, 王海波, 王孝娣, 冀晓昊, 史祥宾, 王宝亮, 郑晓翠, 王志强, 刘凤之. 不同砧木对‘87-1’葡萄光合特性及荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10): 1972-1981.
Xiao HAN, HaiBo WANG, XiaoDi WANG, XiaoHao JI, XiangBin SHI, BaoLiang WANG, XiaoCui ZHENG, ZhiQiang WANG, FengZhi LIU. Effects of Different Rootstocks on ‘87-1’ Grape Photosynthetic and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1972-1981.
表1
不同砧穗组合表观量子效率、光补偿点、暗呼吸速率"
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | 年份 Years | 表观量子效率 Apparent quantum yield | 光补偿点 Light combination point (μmol·m-2·s-1) | 暗呼吸速率 Dark respiration rate (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Topsis得分 Topsis score | Topsis排名 Topsis ranking | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
得分 Score | 总分 Total score | ||||||
‘87-1’/HPYH | 2016 | 0.0758a | 23.309bc | 1.5222b | 0.5862 | 1.0433 | 4 |
2017 | 0.0657b | 23.4195c | 0.7787d | 0.4571 | |||
‘87-1’/3309C | 2016 | 0.0778a | 17.5864d | 1.2661c | 0.3614 | 1.2148 | 1 |
2017 | 0.0694b | 19.3291de | 1.9137a | 0.8534 | |||
‘87-1’/140Ru | 2016 | 0.0625b | 22.4564bc | 1.3096c | 0.2225 | 0.7233 | 7 |
2017 | 0.0563c | 27.1271b | 1.3909b | 0.5008 | |||
‘87-1’/1103P | 2016 | 0.0624b | 20.3795cd | 1.1497c | 0.5394 | 1.194 | 2 |
2017 | 0.0439d | 18.3896ef | 0.7745d | 0.6546 | |||
‘87-1’/SO4 | 2016 | 0.0713a | 23.489abc | 1.5487b | 0.6334 | 0.0337 | 5 |
2017 | 0.0987a | 15.7004f | 1.367b | 0.4003 | |||
‘87-1’/KZYH | 2016 | 0.0573b | 25.2786ab | 1.3098c | 0.2472 | 0.6468 | 8 |
2017 | 0.0698b | 31.186a | 1.9143a | 0.3996 | |||
‘87-1’/5C | 2016 | 0.0799a | 26.8487a | 1.9114a | 0.4063 | 0.7399 | 6 |
2017 | 0.0661b | 22.7534dc | 1.177c | 0.3336 | |||
‘87-1’/Beta | 2016 | 0.0745a | 18.9303d | 1.3077c | 0.3501 | 1.1017 | 3 |
2017 | 0.0548c | 22.8865c | 1.1474c | 0.7516 |
表2
不同砧穗组合羧化效率、CO2补偿点"
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | 年份 Year | 羧化效率 Carboxylation efficiency | CO2补偿点 CO2 combination point (μmol?m-2?s-1) | Topsis得分 Topsis score | Topsis排名 Topsis ranking | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
得分 Score | 总分 Total score | |||||
‘87-1’/HPYH | 2016 | 0.0391cd | 74.6669d | 0.5677 | 1.0955 | 2 |
2017 | 0.087ab | 77.2568c | 0.5278 | |||
‘87-1’/3309C | 2016 | 0.0615ab | 72.2445d | 0.5465 | 1.1132 | 1 |
2017 | 0.0894a | 77.2742c | 0.5667 | |||
‘87-1’/140Ru | 2016 | 0.0331d | 86.5089b | 0.5308 | 0.9881 | 4 |
2017 | 0.1002a | 80.0318c | 0.4573 | |||
‘87-1’/1103P | 2016 | 0.0554ab | 79.4095c | 0.5203 | 1.0279 | 3 |
2017 | 0.0913a | 85.53c | 0.5076 | |||
‘87-1’/SO4 | 2016 | 0.0267d | 95.7802a | 0.4525 | 0.9059 | 7 |
2017 | 0.0408d | 96.2671b | 0.4534 | |||
‘87-1’/KZYH | 2016 | 0.0532ab | 86.0179b | 0.4659 | 0.9238 | 6 |
2017 | 0.0291d | 109.7934a | 0.4579 | |||
‘87-1’/5C | 2016 | 0.0508bc | 96.0808a | 0.4331 | 0.8197 | 8 |
2017 | 0.0749b | 97.0057b | 0.3866 | |||
‘87-1’/Beta | 2016 | 0.0649a | 79.12c | 0.4389 | 0.9742 | 5 |
2017 | 0.0565c | 84.6062c | 0.5353 |
表3
不同砧穗组合不同温度条件下的光合速率"
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | 年份 Year | 25℃ | 27℃ | 30℃ | 32℃ | 35℃ | 37℃ | ΔX | Topsis得分 Topsis score | Topsis排名 Topsis ranking | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
得分 Score | 总分 Total score | ||||||||||
‘87-1’/HPYH | 2016 | 12.4 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 12.0 | 11.8 | — | 0.6 | 0.4052 | 1.717 | 2 |
2017 | 17 | 16.5 | 16 | 14.9 | 13.9 | 13.1 | 3.9 | 0.6066 | |||
‘87-1’/3309C | 2016 | 14.50 | 14.8 | 14.5 | 14.3 | 14.0 | — | 0.8 | 0.3204 | 1.0118 | 6 |
2017 | 17 | 15.7 | 14.6 | 12.7 | 11.9 | 11.3 | 5.7 | 0.3807 | |||
‘87-1’/140Ru | 2016 | 13.9 | 13.7 | 13.5 | 13.0 | 12.8 | — | 1.1 | 0.199 | 0.8932 | 7 |
2017 | 16 | 14.2 | 13 | 12.4 | 11.9 | 11.3 | 4.7 | 0.4297 | |||
‘87-1’/1103P | 2016 | 13.0 | 12.6 | 12.2 | 11.7 | 11.4 | — | 1.6 | 0.1033 | 0.892 | 5 |
2017 | 18.9 | 18.3 | 17.4 | 16.3 | 15.8 | 14.6 | 4.3 | 0.6105 | |||
‘87-1’/SO4 | 2016 | 14.3 | 14.2 | 13.9 | 13.6 | 13.3 | — | 1 | 0.2353 | 0.7138 | 1 |
2017 | 16.7 | 16.2 | 15.4 | 14.8 | 14.5 | 14 | 2.7 | 0.901 | |||
‘87-1’/KZYH | 2016 | 13.8 | 13.4 | 13.20 | 12.7 | 12.3 | — | 1.5 | 0.143 | 0.7011 | 8 |
2017 | 9.5 | 9.32 | 8.25 | 7.25 | 6.02 | 5.61 | 3.89 | 0.2439 | |||
‘87-1’/5C | 2016 | 10.99 | 11.09 | 10.90 | 10.87 | 10.64 | — | 0.56 | 0.4559 | 0.6287 | 4 |
2017 | 10.2 | 8.42 | 7.83 | 7.76 | 7.24 | 7.11 | 3.09 | 0.4361 | |||
‘87-1’/Beta | 2016 | 12.5 | 12.30 | 12.0 | 11.60 | 11.40 | — | 1.1 | 0.157 | 0.3869 | 3 |
2017 | 16.2 | 15.1 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 13.3 | 13 | 3.2 | 0.7362 |
表4
不同砧穗组合的叶绿素荧光参数"
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | F0 | Fv | Fm | Fv/Fm | Fv/F0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘87-1’/HPYH | 233.0b | 1003bc | 1236a | 0.811a | 4.301ab |
‘87-1’/3309C | 232.7b | 1055.7abc | 1288a | 0.817a | 4.529a |
‘87-1’/140Ru | 257.7a | 1099ab | 1295a | 0.771a | 4.264ab |
‘87-1’/1103P | 248ab | 1149.7a | 1217a | 0.811a | 4.689a |
‘87-1’/SO4 | 253.3a | 1095.7ab | 1349a | 0.812a | 4.345ab |
‘87-1’/KZYH | 237.7ab | 944c | 1181a | 0.798a | 3.970b |
‘87-1’/5C | 244.7ab | 1021.3abc | 1266a | 0.807a | 4.176ab |
‘87-1’/Beta | 230.7b | 969.7bc | 1200a | 0.807a | 4.201ab |
表5
不同砧穗组合光合参数和叶绿素荧光参数的相关系数"
F0 | Fv | Fm | Fv/Fm | Fv / F0 | 表观量子效率 AQY | 光补偿点 LCP | 暗呼吸 速率 Rd | 羧化效率 CE | CO2 补偿点 CCP | 高温下净光合速率 NPR | ΔX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F0 | 1 | |||||||||||
Fv | 0.70637 | 1 | ||||||||||
Fm | 0.57505 | 0.55952 | 1 | |||||||||
Fv/Fm | -0.55284 | -0.06732 | -0.046 | 1 | ||||||||
Fv / F0 | 0.14838 | 0.80414 | 0.27875 | 0.38603 | 1 | |||||||
表观量子效率AQY | 0.14665 | -0.08636 | 0.63229 | 0.25166 | -0.24755 | 1 | ||||||
光补偿点LCP | -0.13968 | -0.61891 | -0.55659 | -0.63451 | -0.75195* | -0.28537 | 1 | |||||
暗呼吸Rd | -0.10423 | -0.3034 | 0.12864 | -0.12677 | -0.34982 | 0.38938 | 0.32475 | 1 | ||||
羧化效率CE | 0.14869 | 0.53979 | 0.17599 | -0.18706 | 0.60889 | -0.56644 | -0.17226 | -0.38793 | 1 | |||
CO2补偿点CCP | 0.14281 | -0.36561 | -0.20268 | -0.01505 | -0.60409 | 0.37939 | 0.32798 | 0.36329 | -0.82159* | 1 | ||
高温下净光合速率 NPR | 0.12225 | 0.59286 | 0.29319 | 0.25136 | 0.72352* | -0.07224 | -0.71057* | -0.57168 | 0.3565 | -0.65507 | 1 | |
ΔX | -0.1395 | 0.24452 | -0.01394 | -0.12738 | 0.4371 | -0.38358 | 0.1165 | 0.36265 | 0.61024 | -0.53241 | 0.01598 | 1 |
[1] |
VRSIC S, PULKO B, KOCSIS L.Factors influencing grafting success and compatibility of grape rootstocks.Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 181: 168-173.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.058 |
[2] |
JIN Z X, SUN H, SUN T Y, WANG Q J, YAO Y X.Modifications of ‘Gold Finger’ grape berry quality as affected by the different rootstocks.Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64: 4189-4197.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.023 pmid: 27088562 |
[3] | HOOVER E E, HEMSTAD P, LARSON D, MACKENZIE J, ZAMBRENO K, PROPSOM F.Rootstock influence on scion vigor, hardiness, yield, and fruit composition of St. Pepin grape.Acta Horticulturae, 2004, 640(640): 201-206. |
[4] | 梅军霞. 不同砧木对红玛斯卡特葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2014. |
MEI J X.Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and fruit quality of ‘Red Alexander’grape [D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University, 2014. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | SOMKUWAR R G, SATISHA J, RAMTEKE S D, SHARMA,J.Effect of rootstocks and pre-harvest treatments on storage life of Thompson seedless grapes.Acta Horticulturae, 2008, 785: 441-446. |
[6] | 陈湘云. 不同砧木对鲜食葡萄生物学性状影响的研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2010. |
CHEN X Y.Study on the effects of grape rootstocks on different biological properties [D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2010. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 杨瑞. 葡萄砧穗组合筛选及嫁接早期亲和力研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2007. |
YANG R.Selections stock-scion combination and studies on graft affinity in early stage of different combination of rootstocks and scions of grape [D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2007 (in Chinese) | |
[8] | SALIMIA R B, HAMDAN S.GRAPEVINE scion-rootstock combinations of palestinian local cultivars and rootstocks resistant to grape phylloxera daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Fitch) [Phylloxeridae: Homoptera].Dirasat Agricultural Sciences, 2009(1): 19-28. |
[9] |
LI Z, MARGUERIT E.The influence of grapevine rootstocks on scion growth and drought resistance.Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 2016, 28(2): 1-15.
doi: 10.1007/s40626-016-0070-x |
[10] |
李敏敏, 袁军伟, 刘长江,韩斌, 黄家珍, 郭紫娟, 赵胜建. 砧木对河北昌黎产区赤霞珠葡萄生长和果实品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 59-63.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003 |
LI M M, YUAN J W, LIU C J, HAN B, HUANG J Z, GUO Z J, ZHAO S J.Effects of rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine in Changli zone, Hebei province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 59-63. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003 |
|
[11] |
SOUMKUWAR R G, TAWARE P B, BHANGE M A, SHARMA J, KHAN I.Influence of different rootstocks on growth, photosynthesis, biochemical composition, and nutrient contents in‘Fantasy Seedless’ grapes. International Journal of Fruit Science, 2015, 15(3): 1-16.
doi: 10.1080/15538362.2015.1031564 |
[12] | 李小红, 周凯, 谢周, 李辉信, 章镇, 陶建敏. 不同葡萄砧木对矢富罗莎葡萄嫁接苗光合作用的影响. 果树学报, 2009, 26(1): 90-93. |
LI X H, ZHOU K, XIE Z, LI H X. ZHANG Z, TAO J M.Photosynthesis of Yatomi Rosa on eight grape rootstocks.Journal of Fruit Science, 2009, 26(1): 90-93. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 刘廷松, 李桂芬. 设施栽培条件下葡萄盛花期的光合特性. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(5): 568-570. |
LIU Y S, LI G F.Some photosynthetic characteristics of blooming grape in protected cultivation.Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2003, 30(5): 568-570. (in Chinese) | |
[14] |
綦伟, 厉恩茂, 翟衡, 王晓芳, 杜远鹏, 谭皓. 部分根区干旱对不同砧木嫁接玛瓦斯亚葡萄生长的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(4): 794-799.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.04.020 |
QIN W, LI E M, ZHAN H, WANG X F, DU Y P, TAN H.Effects of partial rootzone drying on the growth of Vitis vinifera cv. malvasia grafted on varied rootstocks. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(4): 794-799. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.04.020 |
|
[15] |
叶子飘. 光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 727-740.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.012 |
YE Z P.A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6): 727-740. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.06.012 |
|
[16] |
WANG TIENCHIN, CHANG TSUNGHAN.Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment.Expert Systems with Applications, 2007, 33(4): 870-880.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003 |
[17] | 贺普超. 葡萄学. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1999: 74-75. |
HE P C. Vitis Culture.Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1999: 74-75. (in Chinese) | |
[18] |
郑秋玲, 谭伟, 马宁, 翟衡. 钙对高温下巨峰葡萄叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(9): 1963-1968.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.09.025 |
ZHENG Q L, TAN W, MA N, ZHAI H.Effects of calcium on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of 'Kyoho' grape under high temperature stress.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(9): 1963-1968. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.09.025 |
|
[19] | 陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安. 叶绿素荧光动力学及其在植物抗逆生理研究中的应用. 浙江农业学报, 2006, 18(1): 51-55. |
CHEN J M, YU X P, CHENG J A.The application of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics in the study of physiological responses of plants to environmental stresses.Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 2006, 18(1): 51-55. (in Chinese) | |
[20] |
HU C, ULLER-KARGER F E, ZEPP R G. MAbsorbance, absorption coefficient, and apparent quantum yield: A comment on common ambiguity in the use of these optical concepts.Limnology & Oceanography, 2002, 47(4): 1261-1267.
doi: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.4.1261 |
[21] | XU D Q.Non-uniform stomatal closure and non-stomatal limitation of photosynthesis.Plant Physiology Communications, 1995, 31(4) : 246-252. |
[22] |
LEE D W, BONE R A, TARSIS S, STORCH D.Correlates of leaf optical properties in tropical forest sun and extreme-shade plants.America Journal of Botany, 1990, 77(3): 370-380.
doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb13566.x |
[23] |
BJÖRKMAN O, HOMLMGREN P. Adaptability of the photosynthetic apparatus to light intensity in ecotypes from exposed and shaded habitats.Physoil Plantarum, 1963,16( 4) : 889-914.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1963.tb08366.x |
[24] |
秦玉芝, 邢铮, 邹剑锋, 何长征, 李炎林, 熊兴耀. 持续弱光胁迫对马铃薯苗期生长和光合特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(3): 537-545.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.03.013 |
QIN Y Z, XING Z, ZOU J F, HE C Z, LI Y L, XIONG X Y.Effects of sustained weak light on seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics of potato seedlings.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(3): 537-545. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.03.013 |
|
[25] | CAMPBELL C D, SAGE R F, KOCACINAR F, WAY D A.Estimation of the whole plant CO2 compensation point of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Global Change Biology, 2010, 11: 1956-1967. |
[26] |
王志强, 何方, 牛良, 刘淑娥, 宗学普, 何方. CO2施肥对大棚油桃光合作用及产量品质的影响. 果树学报, 2001, 18(2): 75-79.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2001.02.004 |
WANG Z Q, HE F, NIU L A, LIU SH E, ZONG X P, HE F.The effects of CO2 enrichment on photosynthesis, yield and quality of nectarine in greenhouse.Journal of Fruit Science, 2001, 18(2):75-79. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2001.02.004 |
|
[27] | 张艳丽, 张重义, 李友军, 刘辉, 李娟. 不同密度下牛膝叶绿素荧光特性比较. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(7): 1089-1094. |
ZHANG Y L, ZHANG Z Y, Li Y J, LIU H, L J. Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics ofAchyranthes bidentata under different planting densities. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(7): 1089-1094. (in Chinese) | |
[28] |
罗青红, 李志军, 伍维模, 韩路. 胡杨、灰叶胡杨光合及叶绿素荧光特性的比较研究. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(5):983-988.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.05.018 |
LUO Q H, LI Z J, WU W M, HAN L.Comparative study of photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006, 26(5): 983-988. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2006.05.018 |
|
[29] |
简在友, 王文全, 孟丽, 许桂芳,王秋玲, 李卫东, 俞敬波. 芍药组内不同类群间光合特性及叶绿素荧光特性比较. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(12): 1463-1471.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.12.013 |
JIAN Z Y, WANG W Q, MENG L, XU G F, WANG Q L, LI W D, YU J B.Comparison of photosynthetic and fluorescence characteristics among taxa in Paeonia sect. Paeonia.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(12): 1463-1471. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.12.013 |
|
[30] |
吴飞燕,伊力塔,李修鹏,殷秀敏, 刘美华, 余树全.不同光照强度对石栎幼苗叶绿素含量及叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 东北农业大学学报,2012, 43(4): 88-92.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2012.04.016 |
WU F Y, YI L T, LI X P, YIN X M, LIU M H, YU SH Q.Effect of different light intensity on intensity chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence in Lithocarpus glaber. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2012, 43(4): 88-92. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2012.04.016 |
|
[31] | VAN KOOTEN O, SNEL J F H.Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25: 147-150. |
[32] | DEMMING-ADAMS B, Adams W W Ⅲ, Barker D H.1996. Physiology Plan. 98: 253-264. |
[33] |
STEFANOS K, IONNIST T, ELEFTHERIA Z, NIKOLAOS N.Rootstock effects on the adaptive strategies of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon) under contrasting water status: Leaf physiological and structural responses. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2008, 128(1): 86-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.006 |
[34] |
郑秋玲, 王慧, 韩真, 翟衡. 赤霞珠不同砧穗组合对中后期光合能力及果实品质的影响. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2010(3): 10-13.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7360.2010.05.002 |
ZHENG Q L, WANG H, HAN Z, ZHAI H.The influences of several scion-cultivar/rootstock combinations on photosynthesis during middle and late growing seasons and berry quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine.Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2010(3): 10-13. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7360.2010.05.002 |
|
[35] |
陈继峰. 葡萄砧木品种的研究现状与展望. 果树学报, 2000, 17(2): 138-146.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2000.02.013 |
CHEN J F.The Status of Research on Grape Rootstock Varieties and Its Prospect.Journal of Fruit Science, 2000, 17(2): 138-146. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2000.02.013 |
|
[36] |
王海波, 王孝娣, 史祥宾, 王宝亮, 郑晓翠, 刘凤之. 葡萄不同品种对设施环境的适应性. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(6): 1213-1220.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.06.015 |
WANG H B, WANG X D, SHI X B, WANG B L, ZHENG X C, LIU F Z.Environmental adaptability of different grape cultivars in greenhouse.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(6): 1213-1220. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.06.015 |
[1] | 谷闻东, 刘春娟, 李邦, 刘畅, 周宇飞. 外源色氨酸对低氮胁迫下高粱苗期叶片碳氮平衡和衰老特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(7): 1295-1310. |
[2] | 常春义, 曹元, Ghulam Mustafa, 刘红艳, 张羽, 汤亮, 刘兵, 朱艳, 姚霞, 曹卫星, 刘蕾蕾. 白粉病对小麦光合特性的影响及病害严重度的定量模拟[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(6): 1061-1073. |
[3] | 熊伟仡, 徐开未, 刘明鹏, 肖华, 裴丽珍, 彭丹丹, 陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748. |
[4] | 徐珂,樊志龙,殷文,赵财,于爱忠,胡发龙,柴强. 氮肥后移及间作对玉米光合特性的耦合效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4131-4143. |
[5] | 李小凡, 邵靖宜, 于维祯, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝. 高温干旱复合胁迫对夏玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3516-3529. |
[6] | 原程, 张玉先, 王孟雪, 黄炳林, 辛明强, 尹小刚, 胡国华, 张明聪. 中耕时间和深度对大豆光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2911-2926. |
[7] | 武翠卿,孙静鑫,郭平毅,王宏富,武新慧. 农艺措施对谷子产量及抗倒伏力学性能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(6): 1127-1142. |
[8] | 宗毓铮,张函青,李萍,张东升,林文,薛建福,高志强,郝兴宇. 大气CO2与温度升高对北方冬小麦旗叶光合特性、碳氮代谢及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23): 4984-4995. |
[9] | 程彬,刘卫国,王莉,许梅,覃思思,卢俊吉,高阳,李淑贤,AliRAZA,张熠,IrshanAHMAD,敬树忠,刘然金,杨文钰. 种植密度对玉米-大豆带状间作下大豆光合、产量及茎秆抗倒的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19): 4084-4096. |
[10] | 于维祯,张晓驰,胡娟,邵靖宜,刘鹏,赵斌,任佰朝. 弱光涝渍复合胁迫对夏玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(18): 3834-3846. |
[11] | 刘星,曹红霞,廖阳,周宸光,李黄涛. 滴灌模式对苹果光合特性、产量及灌溉水利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(15): 3264-3278. |
[12] | 郭美俊,白亚青,高鹏,申洁,董淑琦,原向阳,郭平毅. 二甲四氯胁迫对谷子幼苗叶片衰老特性和 内源激素含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(3): 513-526. |
[13] | 张春雨,白晶,丁相鹏,张吉旺,刘鹏,任佰朝,赵斌. 错株增密种植对夏玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 3928-3941. |
[14] | 刘笑鸣,顾万荣,李从锋,张立国,王明泉,龚士琛,陈喜昌,李彩凤,魏湜,李文华. 化学调控和氮肥对高密度下春玉米光热水利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3083-3094. |
[15] | 闫恒辉,温樱,王东. 底肥分层条施对冬小麦旗叶衰老和光合特性、籽粒产量和肥料利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5): 813-821. |
|