不同品种和栽培条件下水稻冠层光合有效辐射传输特征

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.01.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】揭示水稻冠层光合有效辐射（PAR）传输特征在不同栽培条件下的变化规律。【方法】以2个不同株型水稻品种为材料，于2009—2010年分别设置不同栽插密度和施氮水平的田间试验，系统测定水稻主要生育时期的冠层结构和PAR传输参数，分析冠层结构和PAR传输参数随生育进程的动态变化规律以及PAR传输参数的日变化规律，并研究入射光散射比例对冠层PAR传输的影响。【结果】栽插密度和施氮量对水稻叶面积指数（LAI）、冠层平均叶倾角和株高有显著影响。冠层PAR透过率、反射率随生育进程先减后增，最小值出现在孕穗至抽穗期；提高施氮量减少了冠层PAR反射率。随生育进程的推进，水稻冠层消光系数（K）逐渐增加，并随栽插密度和施氮量增加而增加，不同条件下的K值随移栽后天数的变化可以用指数递增方程来描述。冠层PAR反射率、截获率和K值的日变化呈向下抛物线状，以正午时刻最小；而PAR透过率则呈相反模式；灌浆期PAR透过率、截获率和K值的日变化幅度明显小于分蘖期和拔节期。消光系数随太阳高度角的变化可以用Doseresp曲线来描述，但受到品种特性和冠层结构的影响。随着入射光散射比例的增加，PAR透过率逐渐减少，K值逐渐增加。【结论】水稻冠层PAR传输特征受栽插密度和施氮量的调控，并存在显著的生育时期变化和日变化规律，同时受入射光散射比例的影响。

关键词: 水稻, 光合有效辐射, 消光系数, 散射比例

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this study was to explore the dynamic transfer characteristics of canopy photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in different rice cultivars and under different cultural conditions.【Method】Field experiments were conducted in Nanjing in 2009 and in Yizheng in 2010, involving two cultivars with different plant types, three planting densities and five nitrogen rates. During rice growing periods, the dynamics of canopy structure and the daily changes in PAR transfer parameters were measured, and the effects of proportion of diffuse radiation on canopy PAR transfer characteristics were analyzed. 【Result】 The results indicated that canopy leaf area index (LAI), average leaf inclination and plant height of rice were affected significantly by planting densities and nitrogen rates. Dynamics of canopy PAR transmittance and reflectance firstly decreased and then increased over growing progress of rice, with the minimum value appeared during booting to heading stages. Canopy PAR reflectance decreased with enhancing nitrogen rates. Extinction coefficient (K) in canopy increased over growing progress of rice and with increasing planting densities and nitrogen rates. The dynamics of K with the days after transplanting could be described with the upward exponential equation. The daily change patterns of canopy PAR reflectance and interceptance, and K values could be described with downward parabolic curves, reaching the minimum values at noon, while opposite patterns were seen /in the PAR transmittance. The ranges of daily variation in canopy PAR transmittance and interceptance, and K values at grain filling stage were obviously lower than those at tillering stage. The dynamics of K with the solar angle could be described with the Doseresp curve, which was affected by the canopy structure and cultivar genetic characteristics. Canopy PAR transmittance decreased and K value enhanced with reduced proportion of diffuse radiation.【Conclusion】The dynamic characteristics of canopy PAR transfer in rice were regulated by planting densities and nitrogen rates, exhibiting marked changes over daily times and growth stages, and affected by the proportion of diffuse radiation. These results will provide experimental supports for precision simulation of canopy photosynthesis and productivity in rice.

Key words: rice, photo-syntheticallyactiveradiation, extinctioncoefficient, proportionofdiffuseradiation

朱相成, 汤亮, 张文宇, 曹梦莹, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 不同品种和栽培条件下水稻冠层光合有效辐射传输特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(1): 34-43.

ZHU Xiang-Cheng, TANG Liang, ZHANG Wen-Yu, CAO Meng-Ying, CAO Wei-Xing, ZHU Yan. Transfer Characteristics of Canopy Photo-Synthetically Active Radiation in Different Rice Cultivars Under Different Cultural Conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(1): 34-43.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.01.005

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I1/34

参考文献

[1]王锡平, 李保国, 郭　焱, 翟志席. 玉米冠层内光合有效辐射三维空间分布的测定和分析. 作物学报, 2004, 30(6): 568-576.

Wang X P, Li B G, Guo Y, Zhai Z X. Measurement and analysis of the 3D spatial distribution of photosynthetically active radiation in maize canopy. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30(6): 568-576. (in Chinese)

[2]申广荣, 王人潮, 李云梅, 王秀珍, 沈掌泉. 水稻群丛结构和辐射传输分析. 作物学报, 2001, 27(6): 769-775.

Shen G R, Wang R C, Li Y M, Wang X Z, Shen Z Q. Study on rice cluster architecture and radiation transfer. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(6): 769-775. (in Chinese)

[3]Zhang Y B, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B, Li D Q, Qin J Q, Yang S H, Chen L J, Xia B, Peng S B. Yield potential and radiation use efficiency of ‘‘super’’ hybrid rice grown under subtropical conditions. Field Crops Research, 2009, 114: 91-98.

[4]Li G H, Xue L H, Gu W, Yang C D, Wang S H, Ling Q H, Qin X, Ding Y F. Comparison of yield components and plant type characteristics of high-yield rice between Taoyuan, a ‘special eco-site’ and Nanjing, China. Field Crops Research, 2009, 87: 54-61.

[5]李迪秦, 唐启源, 秦建权, 张运波, 郑华英, 杨胜海, 陈立军, 邹应斌. 水稻光能辐射利用率与产量的关系. 核农学报, 2010, 24(4): 809-814.

Li D Q, Tang Q Y, Qin J Q, Zhang Y B, Zheng H Y, Yang S H, Chen L J, Zou Y B. Effects of nitrogen management patterns on grain yield, solar radiant use efficiency in super hybrid rice. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 24(4): 809-814. (in Chinese)

[6]吕川根, 邹江石, 胡　凝, 姚克敏. 水稻叶片形态对冠层特性和光合有效辐射传输的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2007, 23(6): 501-508.

Lv C G, Zou J S, Hu N, Yao K M. Effects of leaf morphological factors on canopy structure and transmission of photosynthetically active radiation in rice. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 23(6): 501-508. (in Chinese)

[7]李艳大, 汤　亮, 张玉屏, 刘蕾蕾, 曹卫星, 朱　艳. 水稻冠层光合有效辐射的时空分布特征. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(4): 952-958.

Li Y D, Tang L, Zhang Y P, Liu L L, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Spatiotemporal distribution of photosynthetically active radiation in rice canopy. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(4): 952-958. (in Chinese)

[8]徐正进, 陈温福, 张文忠, 马殿荣, 徐　海. 水稻冠层垂直反射率的品种间差异及其影响因素初步分析. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2868-2872.

Xu Z J, Chen W F, Zhang W Z, Ma D R, Xu H. A preliminary analysis on difference of nadir reflectance of canopy and its affecting factors in different rice varieties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2868-2872. (in Chinese)

[9]谢立勇, 徐正进, 林而达, 张文忠, 刘宏光. 水稻灌浆期群体光能截获与利用分析. 中国农业气象, 2005, 26(4): 207-209.

Xie L Y, Xu Z J, Ling E D, Zhang W Z, Liu H G. Utilization and interception of light on rice population during filling stage. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2005, 26(4): 207-209. (in Chinese)

[10]Kiniry J R, Cauley G M, Xie Y. Rice parameters describing crop performance of four U.S. cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93: 1354-1361.

[11]Casanova D, Epema G F, Goudriaan J. Monitoring rice reflectance at field level for estimating biomass and LAI. Field Crops Research,1998, 55: 83-92.

[12]李艳大, 汤　亮, 张玉屏, 朱相成, 曹卫星, 朱　艳. 水稻冠层光截获与叶面积和产量的关系. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(16): 3296-3305.

Li Y D, Tang L, Zhang Y P, Zhu X C, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Relationship of PAR Interception of canopy to leaf area and yield in rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(16): 3296-3305. (in Chinese)

[13]张　涛, 殷　红, 辛明月. 水稻冠层光合有效辐射的分布特征及其与叶面积指数的关系. 中国农业气象, 2010, 31(2): 251-254.

Zhang T, Yin H, Xin M Y. Distribution characteristics of PAR in rice canopy and relationship between PAR and LAI. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2010, 31(2): 251-254. (in Chinese)

[14]高亮之, 金之庆, 张更生, 石春林, 葛道阔. 水稻最佳株型群体受光量与光合量的数值模拟. 江苏农业学报, 2000, 16(1): 1-9.

Gao L Z, Jin Z Q, Zhang G S, Shi C L, Ge D K. A numerical model to simulate the incident radiation and photosynthate for rice canopies with optimum plant type. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 16(1): 1-9. (in Chinese)

[15]吕丽华, 赵　明, 赵久然, 陶宏斌, 王　璞. 不同施氮量下夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性的变化. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2624-2632.

Lv L H, Zhao M, Zhao J R, Tao H B, Wang P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis of summer maize under different nitrogen fertilizer application rates. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2624-2632. (in Chinese)

[16]林洪鑫, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 彭春瑞, 吴建富. 栽插密度与施氮量对双季稻上部三叶叶长和叶角的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1743-1751.

Ling H X, Pan X H, Shi Q H, Peng C R, Wu J F. Effects of nitrogen application amount and planting density on angle and length of Top three leaves in double-cropping rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(10): 1743-1751. (in Chinese)

[17]李国强, 汤　亮, 张文宇, 曹卫星, 朱　艳. 施氮量对不同株型小麦品种叶型垂直分布特征的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37(1): 127-137.

Li G Q, Tang L, Zhang W Y, Cao W X, Zhu Y. Effect of nitrogen rate on vertical distribution characteristics of leaf-type in wheat with different plant types. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(1): 127-137. (in Chinese)

[18]Binghama I J, Blake J, Foulkes M J. Is barley yield in the UK sink limited? I. Post-anthesis radiation interception, radiation-use efficiency and source–sink balance. Field Crops Research, 2007, 101: 198-211.

[19]陈雨海, 余松烈, 于振文. 小麦生长后期群体光截获量及其分布与产量的关系. 作物学报, 2003, 29(5): 730-734.

Chen Y H, Yu S L, Yu Z W. Relationship between amount or distribution of PAR interception and grain output of wheat communities. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2003, 29(5): 730-734. (in Chinese)

[20]高晓飞, 谢　云, 王晓岚. 冬小麦冠层消光系数日变化的实验研究. 资源科学, 2004, 26(1): 137-142.

Gao X F, Xie Y, Wang X L. Experiment research of diurnal variation of winter wheat canopy extinction coefficient. Resource Science, 2004, 26(1): 137-142. (in Chinese)

[21]莫兴国, 林忠辉, 项月琴, 刘苏峡. 玉米群体辐射传输特征. 中国生态农业学报, 2000, 8(1): 1-4.

Mo X G, Lin Z H, Xiang Y Q, Liu S X. Characteristics of incoming radiation through maize canopy. Eco-Agricultural Research, 2000, 8(1): 1-4. (in Chinese)

[22]Maddonni G A, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G. Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71: 183-193.

[23]孟亚利, 曹卫星, 柳新伟, 周治国, 潘　洁. 水稻光合生产与干物质累积的动态模拟. 生物数学学报, 2004, 19(2): 205-212.

Meng Y L, Cao W X, Liu X W, Zhou Z G, Pan J. Dynamic simulation photosynthetic production and dry matter accumulation in rice. Journal of Biomathematics, 2004, 19(2): 205-212. (in Chinese)

[24]Timsina J, Humphreys E. Performance of CERES-Rice and CERES-Wheat models in rice-wheat systems: A review. Agricultural Systems, 2006, 90: 5-31.

[25]Confalonieri R, Acutis M, Bellocchi G, Donatelli M. Multi-metric evaluation of the modelsWARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for rice. Ecological Modekling, 2009, 220: 1395-1410.

[26]Hasegawa T, Horie T. Leaf nitrogen, plant age and crop dry matter production in rice. Field Crops Research,1996, 47: 107-116.

[27]Shabanov N V, Wang Y, Buermann W, Dong J, Hoffman S, Smith G R, Tian Y, Knyazikhin Y, Myneni R B. Effect of foliages patial heterogeneity in the MODIS LAI and FPAR algorithm over broadleaf forests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 85: 410-423.

[28]杨　飞, 张　柏, 李凤秀, 国志兴, 勒华安. 大豆和玉米冠层光合有效辐射各分量日变化. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(8): 1153-1158.

Yang F, Zhang B, Li F X, Guo Z X, Le H A. Diurnal changes of photosynthetically active radiation parameters in soybean and corn. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(8): 1153-1158. (in Chinese)

[29]周晓东, 朱启疆, 王锦地, 孙　睿, 陈　雪, 吴门新. 夏玉米冠层内PAR截获及FPAR与LAI的关系. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(1): 110-116.

Zhou X D, Zhu Q J, Wang J D, Sun R, Chen X, Wu M X. Interception of PAR, relationship between FPAR and LAI in summer maize canopy. Journal of Natural Resources, 2002, 17(1): 110-116. (in Chinese)

[30]李　林, 张更生, 姚永康. 水稻开花灌浆期间阴害形成的光谱辐射能特征初步研究. 中国水稻科学, 1994, 8(2): 91-96.

Li L, Zhang G S, Yao Y K. Preliminary studies on characteristics of the radiant spectrum causing the formation of insufficient illumination impairment during rice flowering-filling period. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 1994, 8(2): 91-96. (in Chinese)

[31]于　强, 王天铎, 刘建栋, 孙菽芬. 玉米株型与冠层光合作用的数学模拟研究I. 模型与验证. 作物学报, 1998, 24(1): 7-15.

Yu Q, Wang T D, Liu J D, Sun S F. A mathematical study on crop architecture and canopy photosynthesis I. model and validation. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1998, 24(1): 7-15. (in Chinese)