QTLs for Waterlogging Tolerance at Germination and Seedling Stages in Population of Recombinant Inbred Lines Derived from a Cross Between Synthetic and Cultivated Wheat Genotypes

doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60354-8

Journal of Integrative Agriculture

2014, Vol. 13

Issue (1): 31-39 DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60354-8

Crop Genetics · Breeding · Germplasm Resources

Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

QTLs for Waterlogging Tolerance at Germination and Seedling Stages in Population of Recombinant Inbred Lines Derived from a Cross Between Synthetic and Cultivated Wheat Genotypes

YU Ma, MAO Shuang-lin, CHEN Guo-yue, LIU Ya-xi, LI Wei, WEI Yu-ming, LIU Chun-ji , ZHENG You-liang

1.Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
2.Agronomy College, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
3.CSIRO Plant Industry, St Lucia QLD 4067, Australia

Abstract
References

Download: PDF in ScienceDirect
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 Waterlogging is a widespread limiting factor for wheat production throughout the world. To identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth, survival rate (SR), germination rate index (GRI), leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI), root length index (RLI), plant height index (PHI), root dry weight index (RDWI), shoot dry weight index (SDWI), and total dry weight index (DWI) were assessed using the International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) population W7984/Opata85. Significant and positive correlations were detected for all traits in this population except RLI. A total of 32 QTLs were associated with waterlogging tolerance on all chromosomes except 3A, 3D, 4B, 5A, 5D, 6A, and 6D. Some of the QTLs explained large proportions of the phenotypic variance. One of these is the QTL for GRI on 7A, which explained 23.92% of the phenotypic variation. Of them, 22 alleles from the synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 contributed positively. These results suggested that synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 is an important genetic resource for waterlogging tolerance in wheat. These alleles conferring waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth in wheat could be utilized in wheat breeding for improving waterlogging tolerance.

Abstract Waterlogging is a widespread limiting factor for wheat production throughout the world. To identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth, survival rate (SR), germination rate index (GRI), leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI), root length index (RLI), plant height index (PHI), root dry weight index (RDWI), shoot dry weight index (SDWI), and total dry weight index (DWI) were assessed using the International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) population W7984/Opata85. Significant and positive correlations were detected for all traits in this population except RLI. A total of 32 QTLs were associated with waterlogging tolerance on all chromosomes except 3A, 3D, 4B, 5A, 5D, 6A, and 6D. Some of the QTLs explained large proportions of the phenotypic variance. One of these is the QTL for GRI on 7A, which explained 23.92% of the phenotypic variation. Of them, 22 alleles from the synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 contributed positively. These results suggested that synthetic hexaploid wheat W7984 is an important genetic resource for waterlogging tolerance in wheat. These alleles conferring waterlogging tolerance at early stages of growth in wheat could be utilized in wheat breeding for improving waterlogging tolerance.

Keywords: wheat waterlogging tolerance QTL germination and seedling stages

Received: 05 December 2012 Accepted:

Fund:

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB100100), the National High- Tech R&D Program of China (2011AA100103) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31230053 and 31171556).

Corresponding Authors: ZHENG You-liang, Tel: +86-28-86290909, Fax: +86-28-82650350, E-mail: ylzheng@sicau.edu.cn

About author: ZHENG You-liang, Tel: +86-28-86290909, Fax: +86-28-82650350, E-mail: ylzheng@sicau.edu.cn

	Service
	E-mail this article
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YU Ma
	MAO Shuang-lin
	CHEN Guo-yue
	LIU Ya-xi
	LI Wei
	WEI Yu-ming
	LIU Chun-ji
	ZHENG You-liang

Cite this article:

YU Ma, MAO Shuang-lin, CHEN Guo-yue, LIU Ya-xi, LI Wei, WEI Yu-ming, LIU Chun-ji , ZHENG You-liang. 2014. QTLs for Waterlogging Tolerance at Germination and Seedling Stages in Population of Recombinant Inbred Lines Derived from a Cross Between Synthetic and Cultivated Wheat Genotypes. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(1): 31-39.

Ahn S, Anderson J A, Sorrells M E, Tanksley S D. 1993.Homoeologous relationships of rice, wheat and maize chromosomes. Molecular and General Genetics, 241,483-490

Armstrong W, Brändle R, Jackson M B. 1994. Mechanismsof flood tolerance in plants. Acta Botanica Neerlandica,43, 307-358

Boru G, van G M, Kronstad W E, Boersma L. 2001.Expression and inheritance of waterlogging tolerance stress in wheat. Euphytica, 117, 91-98

Burgos M S, Messmer M M, Stamp P, Chmid J. 2001.Flooding tolerance of spelt (Triticum spelta L.) comparedto wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) - a physiological andgenetic approach. Euphytica, 122, 287-295

Cao Y, Cai S B, Wu Z S, Zhu W, Fang X W, Xiong E H. 1995. Studies on genetic features of waterloggingtolerance in wheat. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 11,11-15 (in Chinese)

Collaku A, Harrison S A. 2005. Heritability of waterloggingtolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 45, 722-727

Colmer T D, Flowers T J, Munns R. 2006. Use of wildrelatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 57, 1059-1078

Colmer T D, Voesenek L A C J. 2009. Flooding tolerance:suites of plant traits in variable environments. FunctionalPlant Biology, 36, 665-681

Cui F, Li J, Ding A M, Zhao C H, Wang L, Wang X Q, Li SS, Bao Y G, Li X F, Feng D S, et al. 2011. ConditionalQTL mapping for plant height with respect to the lengthof the spike and internode in two mapping populationsof wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122, 1517-1536

van Deynze A E, Dubcovsky J, Gill K S, Nelson J C, Sorrells M E, Dvofak J, Gill B S, Lagudah E S,McCouch S R, Appels R. 1995. Molecular-genetic mapsfor group 1 chromosomes of Triticeae species and theirrelation to chromosomes in rice and oat. Genome, 38,45-59

Evans D E. 2003. Aerenchyma formation. New Phytologist,161, 35-49

Hossain A, Uddin S N. 2011. Mechanisms of waterloggingtolerance in wheat: Morphological and metabolic adaptations under hypoxia or anoxia. Australian Journalof Crop Science, 5, 1094-1101

Huang B, Johnson J W, Nesmith S, Bridges D C. 1994a.Growth, physiological and anatomical responses of twowheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply.Journal of Experimental Botany, 45, 193-202

Huang B, Johnson J W, Nesmith D S, Bridges D C. 1994b.Root and shoot growth of wheat genotypes in responseto hypoxia and subsequent resumption of aeration. CropScience, 34, 1538-1544

Jackson M B, Armstrong W. 1999. Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation inrelation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biology,1, 274-287

Jackson M B, Drew M C. 1984. Effects of flooding ongrowth and metabolism of herbaceous plants. In: Kozlowski T T, ed., Flooding and Plant Growth.Academic Press, New York. pp. 47-128

Jayatilake D V, Bai G H, Dong Y H. 2011. A novel quantitative trait locus for Fusarium head blight resistance in chromosome 7A of wheat. Theoretical andApplied Genetics, 122, 1189-1198

King I P, Forster B P, Law C C, Cant K A, Orford S E,Gorham J, Reader S, Miller T E. 1997. Introgression ofsalt-tolerance genes from Thinopyrum bessarabicum intowheat. New Phytologist, 137, 75-81

Lage J, Skovmand B, Andersen S B. 2003. Expression andsuppression of resistance to greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) in synthetic hexaploid wheats derived from Triticum dicoccum × Aegilops tauschii crosses. Journalof Economic Entomology, 96, 202-206

Li H B, Vaillancourt R, Mendham N J, Zhou M X. 2008.Comparative mapping of quantitative trait loci associatedwith waterlogging tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.). BMC Genomics, 9, 401.

Ma H X, Bai G H, Zhang X, Lu W Z. 2006. Main effects,epistasis, and environmental interactions of quantitativetrait loci for Fusarium head blight resistance in a recombinant inbred population. Phytopathology, 96,534-541

Ma L Q, Zhou E F, Huo N X, Zhou R H, Wang G Y, Jia J Z.2007. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in a recombinantinbred population of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Euphytica, 153, 109-117

Martin N, Bouck A, Arnold M. 2006. Detecting adaptive trait introgression between Iris fulva and I. brevicaulisin highly selective field conditions. Genetics, 172, 2481-2489

McDonald M P, Galwey N W, Ellneskog-Staam P, ColmerT D. 2001. Evaluation of Lophopyrum elongatum asa source of genetic diversity to increase waterloggingtolerance of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum). NewPhytologist, 151, 369-380

Mujeeb-Kazi A, RosasV, Roldan S. 1996. Conservationof the genetic variation of Triticum tauschii (Coss.)Schmalh. (Aegilops squarrosa auct. Non L.) insynthetic hexaploid wheats (T. turgidum L. × T. tauschii;2n=6x=42, AABBDD) and its potential utilizationfor wheat improvement. Genetic Resources and CropEvolution, 43, 129-134

Munns R, James R A, Islam A K M R, Colmer T D. 2011.Hordeum marinum-wheat amphiploids maintain higher leaf K+:Na+ and suffer less leaf injury than wheat parentsin saline conditions. Plant Soil, 348, 365-377

Nandi S, Subudhi P K, Senadhira D, Manigbas N L,SenMandi S, Huang N. 1997. Mapping QTL for submergence tolerance in rice by AFLP analysis andselective genotyping. Molecular and General Genetics,255, 1-8

Pang J Y, Zhou M X, Mendham N, Shabala S. 2004. Growthand physiological responses of six barley genotypes to waterlogging and subsequent recovery. AustralianJournal of Agricultural Research, 55, 895-906

Parelle J, Dreyer E, Brendel O. 2010. Genetic variability anddeterminism of adaptation of plants to soil waterlogging.In: Mancuso S, Shabala S, eds., Waterlogging Signallingand Tolerance in Plants. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag,Germany. pp. 241-265

Pearson A, Cogan N O I, Baillie B C, Hand M L,Bandaranayake C K, Erb S, Wang J P, Kearney G A,Gendall A R, Smith K F, et al. 2011. Identification of QTL for morphological traits influencing waterloggingtolerance in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.).Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122, 609-622

Poysa V W. 1984. The genetic control of low temperature,iceencasement, and flooding tolerances by chromosomes5A, 5B, and 5D in wheat. Cereal ResearchCommunications, 12, 135-141

Qiu F Z, Zheng Y L, Zhang Z L, Xu S Z. 2007. Mappingof QTL associated with waterlogging tolerance duringthe seedling stage in maize. Annals of Botany, 99, 1067-1081

Samad A, Meisner C A, Saifuzzaman M, van Ginkel M.2001. Waterlogging tolerance. In: Reynolds M P,Ortiz-Monasterio J I, McNab A, eds., Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico. pp. 136-144

Settler T L, Waters I. 2003. Reviews of prospects for germplasm improvement for waterlogging tolerance inwheat, barley and oats. Plant Soil, 253, 1-34

Song Q J, Shi J R, Singh S, Fickus E W, Costa J M, LewisJ, Gill B S, Ward R, Cregan P B. 2005. Development and mapping of microsatellite (SSR) markers in wheat Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 110, 550-560

Taeb M, Koebner R M D, Forster B P. 1993. Genetic variation for waterlogging tolerance in the Triticeae and the chromosomal location of genes conferringwaterlogging tolerance in Thinopyrum elongatum.Genome, 36, 825-830

Tang Q Y, Feng M G. 2007. DPS Data Processing System:Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis, and DataMining. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

Thomson C J, Colmer T D, Watkin E L J, GreenwayH. 1992. Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv.Gamenya and Kite) and triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir)to waterlogging. New Phytologist, 120, 335-344

Toojinda T, Siangliw M, Tragoonrung S, Vanavichit A.2003. Molecular genetics of submergence tolerance inrice: QTL analysis of key traits. Annals of Botany, 91,243-253.

Trethowan R M, Mujeeb-Kazi A. 2008. Novel germplasm resources for improving environmental stress tolerance of hexaploid wheat. Crop Science, 48, 1255-1265

Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. 2007. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, NorthCarolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Watkin E L J, Thomson C J, Greenway H. 1998. Root development in two wheat cultivars and one triticale cultivar grown in stagnant agar and aerated nutrient solution. Annals of Botany, 81, 349-354

Yang W Y, Liu D C, Li J, Zhang L Q, Wei H T, Hu X R,Zheng Y L, He Z H, Zou Y C. 2009. Synthetic hexaploidwheat and its utilization for wheat genetic improvementin China. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 36, 539-546

Zhou M X, Li H B, Mendham N J. 2007. Combining abilityof waterlogging tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgareL.). Crop Science, 47, 278-284.

[1]	Tiantian Chen, Lei Li, Dan Liu, Yubing Tian, Lingli Li, Jianqi Zeng, Awais Rasheed, Shuanghe Cao, Xianchun Xia, Zhonghu He, Jindong Liu, Yong Zhang. Genome wide linkage mapping for black point resistance in a recombinant inbred line population of Zhongmai 578 and Jimai 22[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3311-3321.
[2]	Dili Lai, Md. Nurul Huda, Yawen Xiao, Tanzim Jahan, Wei Li, Yuqi He, Kaixuan Zhang, Jianping Cheng, Jingjun Ruan, Meiliang Zhou. *Evolutionary and expression analysis of sugar transporters from Tartary buckwheat revealed the potential function of FtERD23* in drought stress**[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3334-3350.
[3]	Zimeng Liang, Juan Li, Jingyi Feng, Zhiyuan Li, Vinay Nangia, Fei Mo, Yang Liu. Brassinosteroids improve the redox state of wheat florets under low-nitrogen stress and alleviate degeneration[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2920-2939.
[4]	Qing Li, Zhuangzhuang Sun, Zihan Jing, Xiao Wang, Chuan Zhong, Wenliang Wan, Maguje Masa Malko, Linfeng Xu, Zhaofeng Li, Qin Zhou, Jian Cai, Yingxin Zhong, Mei Huang, Dong Jiang. Time-course transcriptomic information reveals the mechanisms of improved drought tolerance by drought priming in wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2902-2919.
[5]	Liulong Li, Zhiqiang Mao, Pei Wang, Jian Cai, Qin Zhou, Yingxin Zhong, Dong Jiang, Xiao Wang. Drought priming enhances wheat grain starch and protein quality under drought stress during grain filling[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2888-2901.
[6]	Yapeng Zhang, Wentao Cai, Qi Zhang, Qian Li, Yahui Wang, Ruiqi Peng, Haiqi Yin, Xin Hu, Zezhao Wang, Bo Zhu, Xue Gao, Yan Chen, Huijiang Gao, Lingyang Xu, Junya Li, Lupei Zha. Integrated analyses of genomic and transcriptomic data reveal candidate variants associated with carcass traits in Huaxi cattle[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 3169-3184.
[7]	Xinhu Guo, Jinpeng Chu, Yifan Hua, Yuanjie Dong, Feina Zheng, Mingrong He, Xinglong Dai. Long-term integrated agronomic optimization maximizes soil quality and synergistically improves wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2940-2953.
[8]	Jinpeng Li, Siqi Wang, Zhongwei Li, Kaiyi Xing, Xuefeng Tao, Zhimin Wang, Yinghua Zhang, Chunsheng Yao, Jincai Li. Effects of micro-sprinkler irrigation and topsoil compaction on winter wheat grain yield and water use efficiency in the Huaibei Plain, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2974-2988.
[9]	Baohua Liu, Ganqiong Li, Yongen Zhang, Ling Zhang, Dianjun Lu, Peng Yan, Shanchao Yue, Gerrit Hoogenboom, Qingfeng Meng, Xinping Chen. Optimizing management strategies to enhance wheat productivity in the North China Plain under climate change[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2989-3003.
[10]	Ziqiang Che, Shuting Bie, Rongrong Wang, Yilin Ma, Yaoyuan Zhang, Fangfang He, Guiying Jiang. Mild deficit irrigation delays flag leaf senescence and increases yield in drip-irrigated spring wheat by regulating endogenous hormones[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(8): 2954-2973.
[11]	Xianhong Zhang, Zhiling Wang, Danmei Gao, Yaping Duan, Xin Li, Xingang Zhou. Wheat cover crop accelerates the decomposition of cucumber root litter by altering the soil microbial community[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(7): 2857-2868.
[12]	Zhongwei Tian, Yanyu Yin, Bowen Li, Kaitai Zhong, Xiaoxue Liu, Dong Jiang, Weixing Cao, Tingbo Dai. Optimizing planting density and nitrogen application to mitigate yield loss and improve grain quality of late-sown wheat under rice–wheat rotation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(7): 2558-2574.
[13]	Shengzhong Zhang, Xiaohui Hu, Feifei Wang, Huarong Miao, Chu Ye, Weiqiang Yang, Wen Zhong, Jing Chen. Identification of QTLs for plant height and branching-related traits in cultivated peanut[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(7): 2511-2524.
[14]	Wei Liu, Xueling Huang, Meng Ju, Mudi Sun, Zhimin Du, Zhensheng Kang, Jie Zhao. *Molecular evidence of the west-to-east dispersal of Puccinia* striiformis f. sp. tritici in central Shaanxi and the migration of the inoculum from Gansu**[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2251-2265.
[15]	Bingyan Huang, Hua Liu, Yuanjin Fang, Lijuan Miao, Li Qin, Ziqi Sun, Feiyan Qi, Lei Chen, Fengye Zhang, Shuanzhu Li, Qinghuan Zheng, Lei Shi, Jihua Wu, Wenzhao Dong, Xinyou Zhang. *Identification of oil content QTLs on Arahy12 and Arahy16, and development of KASP markers in cultivated peanut (Arachis* hypogaea L.)**[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2096-2105.

No Suggested Reading articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Cite this article:

About JIA

Editorial board

For authors