|
|
|
Interacted Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Polyamines on Root SystemArchitecture of Citrus Seedlings |
WU Qiang-sheng, ZOU Ying-ning, LIU Chun-yan, LU Ting |
1.College of Horticulture and Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, P.R.China |
|
|
摘要 Either arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) or polyamines (PAs) may change root system architecture (RSA) of plants, whereas the interaction of AMF and PAs on RSA remains unclear. In the present study, we studied the interaction between AMF (Paraglomus occultum) and exogenous PAs, including putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd) and spermine (Spm) on mycorrhizal development of different parts of root system, plant growth, RSA and carbohydrate concentrations of 6-m-old citrus (Citrus tangerine Hort. ex Tanaka) seedlings. After 14 wk of PAs application, PA-treated mycorrhizal seedlings exhibited better mycorrhizal colonization and numbers of vesicles, arbuscules, and entry points, and the best mycorrhizal status of taproot, first-, second-, and third-order lateral roots was respectively found in mycorrhizal seedlings supplied with Put, Spd and Spm, suggesting that PAs might act as a regulated factor of mycorrhizal development through transformation of root sucrose more into glucose for sustaining mycorrhizal development. AMF usually notably increases RSA traits (taproot length, total length, average diameter, projected area, surface area, volume, and number of first-, second-, and third-order lateral roots) of only PA-treated seedlings. Among the three PA species, greater positive effects on RSA change and plant biomass increment of the seedlings generally rank as Spd>Spm>Put, irrespective of whether or not AMF colonization. PAs significantly changed the RSA traits in mycorrhizal but not in non-mycorrhizal seedlings. It suggests that the application of PAs (especially Spd) to AMF plants would optimize RSA of citrus seedlings, thus increasing plant growth (shoot and root dry weight).
Abstract Either arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) or polyamines (PAs) may change root system architecture (RSA) of plants, whereas the interaction of AMF and PAs on RSA remains unclear. In the present study, we studied the interaction between AMF (Paraglomus occultum) and exogenous PAs, including putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd) and spermine (Spm) on mycorrhizal development of different parts of root system, plant growth, RSA and carbohydrate concentrations of 6-m-old citrus (Citrus tangerine Hort. ex Tanaka) seedlings. After 14 wk of PAs application, PA-treated mycorrhizal seedlings exhibited better mycorrhizal colonization and numbers of vesicles, arbuscules, and entry points, and the best mycorrhizal status of taproot, first-, second-, and third-order lateral roots was respectively found in mycorrhizal seedlings supplied with Put, Spd and Spm, suggesting that PAs might act as a regulated factor of mycorrhizal development through transformation of root sucrose more into glucose for sustaining mycorrhizal development. AMF usually notably increases RSA traits (taproot length, total length, average diameter, projected area, surface area, volume, and number of first-, second-, and third-order lateral roots) of only PA-treated seedlings. Among the three PA species, greater positive effects on RSA change and plant biomass increment of the seedlings generally rank as Spd>Spm>Put, irrespective of whether or not AMF colonization. PAs significantly changed the RSA traits in mycorrhizal but not in non-mycorrhizal seedlings. It suggests that the application of PAs (especially Spd) to AMF plants would optimize RSA of citrus seedlings, thus increasing plant growth (shoot and root dry weight).
|
Received: 06 December 2011
Accepted:
|
Fund: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30800747), the Key Project of Ministry of Education of China (211107) and the Science-Technology Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, China (Q20111301). |
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence WU Qiang-sheng, Tel: +86-716-8066262, Mobile: 13986717539, Fax: +86-716-8066262, E-mail: wuqiangsh@163.com
E-mail: wuqiangsh@163.com
|
Cite this article:
WU Qiang-sheng, ZOU Ying-ning, LIU Chun-yan, LU Ting.
2012.
Interacted Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Polyamines on Root SystemArchitecture of Citrus Seedlings. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(10): 1675-1681.
|
[1]Bago B, Pfeffer P E, Abubaker J, Jun J, Allen J W, BrouilletteJ, Douds DD, Lammers P J, Shachar-Hill Y. 2003. Carbonexport from arbuscular mycorrhizal roots involves thetranslocation of carbohydrate as well as lipid. PlantPhysiology, 131, 1496-1507.[2]Berta G, Fusconi A, Hooker J E. 2002. Arbuscularmycorrhizal modifications to plant root systems: scale,mechanisms and consequences. In: Gianinazzi S,Schüepp H, Barea J M, Haselwandter K, eds.,Mycorrhizal Technology in Agricultture. BirkhäuserVerlag, Switzerland. pp. 71-85.[3]Chiancone B, TassoniA, Bagni N, GermanàMA. 2006. Effectof polyamines on in vitro anther culture of Citrusclementina Hort. ex Tan. Plant Cell, Tissue and OrganCulture, 87, 145-153.[4]Couée I, Hummel I, Sulmon C, Gouesbet G, Amrani A E.2004. Involvement of polyamines in root development.Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 76, 1-10.[5]El-Ghachtouli N, Paynot M, Martin-Tanguy J, Morandi D,Gianinazzi S. 1996. Effect of polyamines and polyaminebiosynthesis inhibitors on spore germination andhyphal growth of Glomus mosseae. MycologicalResearch, 100, 597-600.[6]El-Ghachtouli N, Paynot M, Morandi D, Martin-Tanguy J,Gianinazzi S. 1995. The effect of polyamines onendomycorrhizal infection of wild-type Pisum sativum,cv. Frisson (nod+myc+) and two mutants (nod-myc+ andnod-myc-). Mycorrhiza, 5, 189-192.[7]Fuell C, Elliott K A, Hanfrey C C, Franceschetti M, MichaelA J. 2010. Polyamine biosynthetic diversity in plantsand algae. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 513-520.[8]Hooker J E, Munro M, Atkinson D. 1992. Vesiculararbuscularmycorrhizal fungi induced alteration in poplarroot system morphology. Plant and Soil, 145, 207-214.[9]Hrselová H, Gryndler M. 2000. Effect of spermine onproliferation of hyphae of Glomus fistulosum, anarbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, in maize roots. FoliaMicrobiologica, 45, 167-171.[10]Hummel I, Coueé I, Amrani A E, Martin-Tanguy J, HennionF. 2002. Involvement of polyamines in root developmentat low temperature in the subantarctic cruciferousspecies Pringlea antiscorbut ica. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 53, 1463-1473.[11]Ipsilantis I, Karpouzas D G, Papadopoulou K K, EhaliotisC. 2009. Effects of soil application of olive millwastewaters on the structure and function of thecommunity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. SoilBiology and Biochemistry, 41, 2466-2476.[12]Kiswara W, Behnke N, van Avesaath P, Huiskes A H L,Erftemeijer P LA, Bouma T J. 2009. Root architecture ofsix tropical seagrass species, growing in threecontrasting habitats in Indonesian waters. AquaticBotany, 90, 235-245.[13]Kivlin S N, Hawkes C V, Treseder KK. 2011. Global diversityand distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. SoilBiology and Biochemistry, 43, 2294-2303.[14]Phillips J M, Hayman D S. 1970. Improved procedures forclearing roots and staining parasitic and vesiculararbuscularmycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment ofinfection. Transactions of the British MycologicalSociety, 55, 158-161.[15]Sannazzaro A I, Álvarez C L, Menéndez A B, Pieckenstain FL, Albertó E O, Ruiz O A. 2004. Ornithine and argininedecarboxylase activities and effect of some polyaminebiosynthesis inhitors on Gigaspora rosea germinatingspores. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 230, 115-121.[16]Sannazzaro A I, Echeverría M, Albertó E O, Ruiz O A,Menéndez A B. 2007. Modulation of polyamine balancein Lotus glaber by salinity and arbuscular mycorrhizas.Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 45, 39-46.[17]Tang W, Newton R J. 2005. Polyamines promote rootelongation and growth by increasing root cell divisionin regenerated Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.)plantlets. Plant Cell Reports, 24, 581-589.[18]Tisi A, Federico F, Moreno S, Lucretti S, Moschou P N,Roubelakis-Angelakis K A, Angelini R, Cona A. 2011.Perturbation of polyamine catabolism can stronglyaffect root development and xylem differentiation. PlantPhysiology, 157, 200-215.[19]Wu Q S, Peng Y H, Zou Y N, Liu C Y. 2010. Exogenouspolyamines affect mycorrhizal development of Glomusmosseae-colonized citrus (Citrus tangerine) seedlings.ScienceAsia, 36, 254-258.[20]Wu Q S, Xia R X, Zou Y N. 2008. Improved soil structureand citrus growth after inoculation with three arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi under drought stress. EuropeanJournal of Soil Biology, 44, 122-128.[21]Wu Q S, Zou Y N, He X H, Luo P. 2011. Arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi can alter some root characters andphysiological status in trifoliate orange (Poncirustrifoliata L. Raf.) seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation,65, 273-278.[22]Wu Q S, Zou Y N. 2010. Beneficial roles of arbuscularmycorrhizas in citrus seedlings at temperature stress.Scientia Horticulturae, 125, 289-293.[23]Yao Q, Wang L R, Zhu H H, Chen J Z. 2009. Effect ofarbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation on rootsystem architecture of trifoliate orange (Poncirustrifoliata L. Raf.) seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae,121, 458-461.[24]Zhang Z L, Zai L. 2004. Experimental Instructment of PlantPhysiology. 3rd ed. Higher Education Press, Beijing.(in Chinese)Zhu J, Ingram P A, Benfey P N, Elich T. 2011. From lab tofield, new approaches to phenotyping root systemarchitecture. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14,310-317. |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|