|
Special Issue:
玉米耕作栽培合辑Maize Physiology · Biochemistry · Cultivation · Tillage
|
|
|
|
| Dynamics of maize grain drying in the high latitude region of Northeast China |
| CHU Zhen-dong1, 2, 3*, MING Bo2*, LI Lu-lu2, XUE Jun2, ZHANG Wan-xu1, HOU Liang-yu1, 2, XIE Rui-zhi2, HOU Peng2, WANG Ke-ru2, LI Shao-kun1, 2 |
1 Agricultural College, Shihezi University/Key Laboratory of Oasis Eco-Agriculture, Xinjiang Production and Construction Crops, Shihezi 832000, P.R.China
2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
3 Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163000, P.R.China
|
|
|
|
|
摘要
玉米收获时籽粒含水率高是中国东北高纬度地区玉米生产面临的重要问题，这与品种熟期、区域气候条件以及栽培管理技术密切相关。延迟至冬季收获不能有效降低籽粒含水率以解决上述问题。2016至2017年，在黑龙江省大庆市试验点，连续观测了不同成熟型玉米品种生理成熟后籽粒田间干燥情况。采用两段线性模型对籽粒含水率与外界气象因子进行了阶段性分析。1)两段线性模型可以将各品种的籽粒干燥过程划分为两个不同斜率的单独线性干燥过程，且拟合精度良好。2)快速干燥阶段，温度越高，干燥速度越快。而大气水汽压条件对慢速干燥过程的速率有影响。3)干燥速率由快速干燥阶段转为慢速干燥阶段时的籽粒含水率以及气象因子在品种和年份之间不一致，这两者并非是干燥速率明显变化的关键因素。但霜冻后，气温<0℃会显著降低籽粒干燥速率。4)早熟品种生育期短，干燥时间得以延长，籽粒含水率显著低于中晚熟品种。由于气温下降迅速，籽粒的干燥速率显著降低，中晚熟品种难以在田间干燥至较低的含水率水平。因此，更换早熟品种并实施相应的栽培技术是解决高含水率问题的可行途径。
Abstract A high grain moisture content at harvest has been an important problem in the high latitude region of Northeast China, and it is closely related to the genotypes of varieties, local meteorological factors and planting management. However, delayed harvest at a low temperature could not effectively reduce the grain moisture content. In this study, we continuously observed the grain drying during the late stage of different maturing types of maize varieties in Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, China in 2016 and 2017. A two-segment linear model was used to analyze the different stages of the drying processes: 1) Two-segment linear model fitting can divide the grain drying process of all varieties into two separate linear drying processes with different slopes. 2) During the rapid drying stage, the drying was faster at a higher temperature. The rate of slow drying was influenced by air vapor pressure. 3) The moisture content and meteorological factors when the drying rate turns from one stage into the other were not consistent between varieties and years. After entering the frost period, temperatures below 0°C will significantly reduce the rate of grain drying. 4) Due to the short growth period of early-maturing varieties, the drying time was prolonged, and the grain moisture content was lower than that of the mid-late maturing varieties. Local meteorological conditions do not allow the drying of mid-late maturing varieties to achieve a lower moisture content. When the temperature falls below 0°C, the drying rate of grain decreases markedly. Therefore, one feasible way to solve the problem of high moisture content is to replace the early-maturing varieties and implement the corresponding cultivation techniques.
|
|
Received: 02 March 2020
Accepted: 24 September 2020
|
| Fund: This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0300110), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971849), the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-02-25), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (CAAS-ZDRW202004). |
| About author: CHU Zhen-dong, E-mail: czdjym@163.com; MING Bo, E-mail: mingbo@caas.cn; Correspondence LI Shao-kun, Tel/Fax: +86-10-82108891, E-mail: lishaokun@caas.cn; WANG Ke-ru, Tel: +86-10-82108595, Fax: +86-10-82108891, E-mail: wangkeru@caas.cn
* These authors contributed equally to this study. |
Cite this article:
CHU Zhen-dong, MING Bo LI Lu-lu, XUE Jun, ZHANG Wan-xu, HOU Liang-yu, XIE Rui-zhi, HOU Peng, WANG Ke-ru, LI Shao-kun .
2022.
Dynamics of maize grain drying in the high latitude region of Northeast China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 21(2): 365-374.
|
Afuakwa J J, Crookston R K, Jones R J. 1984. Effect of temperature and sucrose availability on kernel black layer development in maize. Crop Science, 24, 285–288.
Borrás L, Westgate M E. 2006. Predicting maize kernel sink capacity early in development. Field Crops Research, 95, 223–233.
Borrás L, Zinselmeier C, Senior M L, Westgate M E, Muszynski M G. 2009. Characterization of grain-filling patterns in diverse maize germplasm. Crop Science, 49, 999–1009.
Brooking I R. 1990. Maize ear moisture during grain-filling, and its relation to physiological maturity and grain-drying. Field Crops Research, 23, 55–68.
Carter M W, Poneleit C G. 1973. Black layer maturity and filling period variation among inbred lines of corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Science, 13, 436–439.
Chai Z W, Wang K R, Guo Y Q, Xie R Z, Li L L, Ming B, Hou P, Liu C W, Chu Z D, Zhang W X, Zhang G Q, Liu G Z, Li S K. 2017. Current status of maize mechanical grain harvesting and its relationship with grain moisture content. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 50, 2036–2043. (in Chinese)
Cloninger F D, Horrocks R D, Zuber M S. 1975. Effects of harvest date, plant density, and hybrid on corn grain quality. Agronomy Journal, 67, 693–695.
Daynard B T, Duncan W G. 1969. The black layer and grain maturity in corn. Crop Science, 9, 473–476.
Daynard T B. 1972. Relationships among black layer formation, grain moisture percentage, and heat unit accumulation in corn. Agronomy Journal, 64, 716–719.
Daynard T B, Kannenberg L W. 1976. Relationships between length of the actual, and effective grain filling periods and grain yield of corn. Canada Journal Plant Science, 56, 237–242.
Despotovic M, Nedic V, Despotovic D, Cvetanovic S. 2015. Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1869–1880.
Earle R, Earle M. 2004. Unit operations in food processing. MSc thesis, The New ZealandInstitute of Food Science & Technology, Massey University, New Zealand.
Elmore R, Abendroth L. 2010. In-field drydown rates and harvest. Retrieved from Iowa State University Digital Repository. [2012-10-27]. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cropnews/361
Gao S, Ming B, Li L L, Xie R Z, Xue J, Hou P Wang K R, Li S K. 2018. Relationship between grain dehydration and meteorological factors in the Yellow-Huai-Hai rivers summer maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 44, 1755–1763. (in Chinese)
Jennings M V. 1974. Genotypic variability in grain quality of corn Zea mays L. Ph D thesis, Iowa State University, America.
Labuza T P, Altunakar L. 2007. Water Activity Prediction and Moisture Sorption Isotherms. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
LI L L, Ming B, Xue J, Gao S, Wang K R, Xie R Z, Hou P, Li S K. 2021. Difference in corn kernel moisture content between pre- and post-harvest. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20, 1775–1782.
Li L L, Xue J, Xie R Z, Wang K R, Ming B, Hou P, Gao S, Li S K. 2018. Effects of grain moisture content on mechanical grain harvesting quality of summer maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 44, 1747–1754. (in Chinese)
Maiorano A, Fanchini D, Donatelli M. 2014. MIMYCS. Moisture, a process-based model of moisture content in developing maize kernels. European Journal of Agronomy, 59, 86–95.
Martinez-Feria R A, Licht M A, Ordóñez R A, Hatfield J L, Coulter J A, Archontoulis S V. 2019. Evaluating maize and soybean grain dry-down in the field with predictive algorithms and genotype-by-environment analysis. Scientific Reports, 9, 7167.
Newton S D, Eagles H A. 2006. Development traits affecting time to low ear moisture in maize. Plant Breeding, 106, 58–67.
Nielsen R L. 2011. Field drydown of mature corn grain. Corny news network (Purdue University). [2013-11-04]. http://www.kingcorn.org/news/timeless/GrainDrying.html
Plett S. 1994. Corn kernel breakage as a function of grain moisture at harvest in a prairie environment. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 74, 543–544.
Pordesimo L O, Saxton A M, Paul L E, Bellm R C. 2006. Investigation into grain dry matter loss during field drying of corn. In: The 2006 American Society of Agriculture and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting. Portland.
Sala R G, Andrade F H, Westgate M E. 2007. Maize kernel moisture at physiological maturity as affected by the source–sink relationship during grain filling. Crop Science, 47, 711–716.
Schmidt J L, Hallauer A R. 1966. Estimating harvest date of corn in the field. Crop Science, 6, 227–231.
Strohman R D, Yoerger R R. 1967. A new equilibrium moisture-content equation. Transactions of the ASAE, 10, 0675–0677.
Tan F Z, Han C B, Zou S L, Liu Z J, Ji Y A. 2008. Elementary study on kernel dry-down traits in earliest maturity maize hybrid. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 24, 161–168. (in Chinese)
Thomison P R, Mullen R W, Lipps P E, Doerge T, Geyer A B. 2011. Corn response to harvest date as affected by plant population and hybrid. Agronomy Journal, 103, 1765–1772.
Thompson T L, Peart R M, Foster G H. 1968. Mathematical simulation of corn drying - A new model. Transactions of the ASAE, 11, 0582–0586.
Wang K R, Li S K. 2017a. Analysis of influencing factors on kernel dehydration rate of maize hybrids. Scientia Agricultural Sinica, 50, 2027–2035. (in Chinese)
Wang K R, Li S K. 2017b. Progresses in research on grain broken rate by mechanical grain harvesting. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 50, 2018–2026. (in Chinese)
Xiang K. 2011. Genetic analysis and measuring method development of kernel fast dry down rate in maize. Ph D thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu. (in Chinese)
Xue J, Xie R Z, Zhang W F, Wang K R, Hou P, Ming B, Gou L, Li S K. 2017. Research progress on reduced lodging of high-yield and -density maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16, 2717–2725.
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
