Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2020, Vol. 19 Issue (4): 1019-1032    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62712-7
Crop Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Single-seed sowing increased pod yield at a reduced seeding rate by improving root physiological state of Arachis hypogaea
LIANG Xiao-yan1, 2*, GUO Feng2, 3*, FENG Ye4, ZHANG Jia-lei2, 3, YANG Sha2, 3, MENG Jing-jing2, 3, LI Xin-guo2, 3, WAN Shu-bo3, 5   
1 Shandong Institute of Sericulture, Yantai 264002, P.R.China
2 Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, P.R.China
3 Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Jinan 250100, P.R.China
4 Agriculture Bureau of Yiyuan, Zibo 256100, P.R.China
5 Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

双粒播种(双粒穴播)是我国传统花生主要种植方式,但是同穴双株之间的竞争限制了植株的生长和产量的形成,另外,传统的双粒播种不利于机械化操作。本研究旨在探讨适宜播种量的单粒播种是否产量优于传统双粒播种以及根系的生理代谢差异。通过连续两年的大田试验,比较了18万粒/ ha-1S180)、22.5万粒/ ha-1S225)、27万粒/ ha-1S270)的单粒播种与27万粒/ ha-1D270)双粒播种的荚果产量差异;同时,比较了根系伤流速率、根系养分含量及伤流液中主要激素含量的差异。试验采用完全随机区组设计,四次重复。结果表明:3个密度的单粒精播荚果产量均高于传统双粒穴播(D270),但S225的荚果产量均高于其它2个单粒精播密度(S180S270)。22.5万粒/ ha-1的单粒精播荚果产量显著增加主要原因在于单株荚果干重及收获指数的增加,而单株荚果重及地上部生物量的增加与根系伤流速率、游离氨基酸、可溶性糖含量及伤流液中K+Mg2+Zn2+Ca2+含量等根系生理指标存在密切关系;同时,根系还原酶、硝酸还原酶、ATP酶活性的提高及根系伤流液中Z+ZR含量的增加对荚果及地上部的生长也具有重要作用。因此,适宜密度(22.5万粒/ ha-1)的单粒精播在提高花生产量和节约种子成本方面是一种有潜力的栽培措施。

Double-seed sowing (two seeds per hole) is the dominant pattern of peanut sowing in China, but within-hole plant competition usually limits their growth and yield formation.  Besides, the traditional double-seed sowing method does not facilitate mechanization during sowing.  The objective of this study was to determine if single-seed sowing at a proper seeding rate yielded better than traditional double-seed sowing pattern and the differences of physiological metabolism of roots.  A field experiment was conducted in two consecutive years to compare pod yields of single-seed sowing at 180 000 (S180), 225 000 (S225), and 270 000 seeds ha–1 (S270) with that of double-seed sowing at 270 000 seeds ha–1 (D270) using a completely randomized block design with four replications.  And the root bleeding sap rate, nutrient content, and the main hormone contents in root bleeding sap were also comparatively investigated.  Although the pod yields of single-seed sowing at the three densities were higher than that of traditional double-seed sowing (D270), S225 yielded better than the other two single-seed sowing treatments (S180 and S270).  The increased pod yield in single-seed sowing at 225 000 seeds ha–1 was mainly due to the higher pod dry weight per plant and harvest index.  The improved pod dry weight and shoot growth had closely relationship with the enhanced root physiological traits such as the increased root bleeding sap rate, content of free amino acids, soluble sugars, K+, Mg2+, Zn2+, and Ca2+ of the individual plant root.  The improved activity of root reductive, nitrate reductase (NR) and ATPase and higher zeatin and zeatin riboside (Z+ZR) content of root bleeding sap were also crucial to the pod and shoot growth of peanut.  Single-seed sowing at a moderate seeding rate (S225) is a potential practice to increase pod yield and to save seed cost.
Keywords:  peanut        sowing pattern        seeding rate        root traits        yield  
Received: 07 December 2018   Accepted:
Fund: This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD1000900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571605, 31801276), the Major Basic Research Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (2018GHZ007), the Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project in Shandong Province, China (2018YFJH0601), the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China (CXGC2018D04, CXGC2016B03-1), the Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China (CXGC2018E13, CXGC2016B10, CXGC2018F6), the Major Agricultural Application Technology Innovation Project in Shandong Province, China (201706), and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-13).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence LI Xin-guo, Tel: +86-531-66659047, E-mail:; WAN Shu-bo, Tel: +86-531-83178127, E-mail:   
About author:  LIANG Xiao-yan, E-mail:; * These authors contributed equally to this study.

Cite this article: 

LIANG Xiao-yan, GUO Feng, FENG Ye, ZHANG Jia-lei, YANG Sha, MENG Jing-jing, LI Xin-guo, WAN Shu-bo. 2020. Single-seed sowing increased pod yield at a reduced seeding rate by improving root physiological state of Arachis hypogaea. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(4): 1019-1032.

Bedane G M, Gupta M L, George D L. 2009. Effect of plant population on seed yield, mass and size of guayule. Industrial Crops and Products, 29, 139–144.
Bialczyk J, Lechowski Z. 1995. Chemical composition of xylem sap of tomato grown on bicarbonate containing medium. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 18, 2005–2021.
Bollmark M, Kubat B, Eliasson L. 1988. Variations in endogenous cytokinin content during adventitious root formation in pea cuttings. Journal of Plant Physiology, 132, 262–265.
Cao S Q, Zhang R X, Lu W, Deng Z R, Zeng Q M. 2004. The involvement of cytokinin and abscisic acid levels in roots in the regulation of photosynthesis function in flag leaves during grain filling in super high-yielding rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190, 73–80.
Caspe B B, Jackson R B. 1997. Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 28, 545–570.
Chang E H, Zhang S F, Wang Z Q. 2008. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on the amino acids in root exudates and grains of rice during grain filling. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 34, 612–618. (in Chinese)
Davies W J, Zhang J H. 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 42, 55–76.
Debi B R, Taketa S, Ichii M. 2005. Cytokinin inhibits lateral root inhibition but stimulates lateral root elongation in rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Plant Physiology, 162, 507–515.
Duncan D R, Widholm J M. 2004. Osmotic induced stimulation of the reduction of the viability dye 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride by maize roots and callus cultures. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161, 397–403.
Feng Y, Guo F, Li B L, Meng J J, Li X G, Wan S B. 2013. Effects of single seed sowing on root growth, root-shoot ratio and yield in peanut (Arachis hypogaca L.). Acta Agronomica Siniaca, 39, 2228–2237. (in Chinese)
Gersani M, Brown J S, O’Brien E E. 2001. Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. Ecology, 89, 660–669.
Guan D H, Al-Kaisi M M, Zhang Y S. 2014. Tillage practices affect biomass and grain yield through regulating root growth, root-bleeding sap and nutrients uptake in summer maize. Field Crops Research, 157, 89–97.
He Z. 1993. Method for an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In: He Z, ed., Guidance to Experiment on Chemical Control in Crop Plants. Beijing Agricultural University Publishers, Beijing. pp. 60–68. (in Chinese)
Henderson T L, Johnson B L, Schneiter A A. 2000. Row spacing, plant population, and cultivar effects on grain amaranth in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 92, 329–336.
Jiang C Z, Hirasawa T, Ishihara K. 1988. Physiological and ecological characteristics of high yielding varieties in rice plants. I. Yield and dry matter production. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 57, 132–138. (in Japanese)
Li A D, Ren W G, Wang C B, Sha J F. 2004. Studies on plant development characters of high-yield cultured peanut and supportang techniques under single-seed precision sowing. Journal of Peanut Science, 33, 17–22. (in Chinese)
Liang X Y, Guo F, Zhang J L, Meng J J, Li L, Wan S B, Li X G. 2015. Effects of single-seed sowing on canopy microenvironment, photosynthetic characteristics and pod yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaca). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 26, 3700–3706. (in Chinese)
Liu F, Jensen C R, Andersen M N. 2003. Hydraulic and chemical signals in the control of leaf expansion and stomatal conductance in soybean exposed to drought stress. Plant Biology, 30, 65–73.
Ma?gorzata R, Magdalena M, Grazyna K. 2011. Effect of short-term salinity on the nitrate reductase activity in cucumber roots. Plant Science, 180, 783–788.
Noguchi A, Kageyama M, Shinmachi F, Schmidhalter U, Hasegawa I. 2005. Potential for using plant xylem sap to evaluate inorganic nutrient availability in soil: I. Influence of inorganic nutrients present in the rhizosphere on those in the xylem sap of Luffa cylindrica Roem. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 51, 333–341.
Nooden L D, Singh S, Letham D S. 1990. Correlation of xylem sap cytokinin levels with monocarpic senescence in soybean. Plant Physiology, 93, 33–39.
Oaks A. 1994. Primary nitrogen assimilation in higher plants and its regulation. Canadian Journal of Botany, 72, 739–750.
Peuke A D. 2000. The chemical composition of xylem sap in Vitis vinifera L. cv. riesling during vegetative vineyard soils and as influenced by nitrogen fertilizer. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 51, 329–339.
Schenk H, Callaway R M, Mahall B E. 1999. Spatial root segregation: Are plants territorial? Advances in Ecological Research, 28, 145–165.
Setter T L, Flannigan B A. 2001. Water deficit inhibits cell division and expression of transcripts involved in cell proliferation and endoreduplication in maize endosperm. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 1401–1408.
Shi X D, Liu Y F, Wen Z Q, Wang W W. 2006. Research progress in plant root bleeding. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 34, 2043–2045. (in Chinese)
Short K C, Torrey J G. 1972. Cytokinins in seedling roots of pea. Plant Physiology, 49, 155–160.
Van Staden J, Davey J E. 1979. The synthesis, transport and metabolism of endogenous cytokinins. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2, 93–106.
Waines J G, Ehdaie B. 2007. Domestication and crop physiology: Roots of green-revolution wheat. Annals of Botany, 100, 991–998.
Wan S B. 2003. Chinese Peanut Cultivation. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai. pp. 1–4. (in Chinese)
Wang C B, Cheng B, Chi Y C, Sun X S, Zhang J M, Miao F Z, Yu R E. 1996. Study on population density of high yield peanut under single-seed planting. Peanut Science and Technology, 3, 17–19. (in Chinese)
Wang Y H, Hu W L, Zhang X L, Li L X, Kang G Z, Feng W, Zhu Y J, Wang C Y, Guo T C. 2014. Effects of cultivation patterns on winter wheat root growth. Field Crops Research, 156, 208–218.
van der Werf A, Kooijman A, Welschen R, Lambers H. 1988. Respiratory energy costs for the maintenance of biomass, for growth and for uptake in roots of Carex diandra and Carex acutiformis. Plant Physiology, 72, 483–491.
Wilson J B. 1988. Shoot competition and root competition. Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 279–296.
Yamazki K, Harada J. 1982. The root system formation and its possible bearings on grain yield in rice plants. Jarq-Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 15, 153–160.
Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S, Liu J J. 2002a. Abscisic acid and cytokinins in the root exudates and leaves and their relationship to senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Planta, 215, 645–652.
Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S, Liu L. 2002b. Correlations of cytokinin levels in the endosperms and roots with cell number and cell division activity during endosperm development in rice. Annals of Botany, 90, 369–377.
Yang L X, Wang Y L, Kobayashi K, Zhu J G, Huang J Y, Yang H J. 2008. Seasonal changes in the effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on growth, morphology and physiology of rice root at three levels of nitrogen fertilization. Global Change Biology, 14, 1–10.
Yu X M, Wang B, Zhang C X, Xu W P, He J J. 2012. Effect of root restriction on nitrogen levels and glutamine synthetase activity in ‘Kyoho’ grapevines. Scientia Horticulturae, 137, 156–163.
Zhao C X, Shao C L, Wang Y F, Song C X, Wang M L. 2013. Effects of different planting densities on population ecological characteristics and yield of peanut under the mode of single-seed precision sowing. Journal of Agriculture Science, 3, 1–5. (in Chinese)
Zhang H, Tan G L, Yang L N, Yang J C, Zhang J H, Zhao B H. 2009a. Hormones in the grains and roots in relation to post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 195–204. (in Chinese)
Zhang H, Xue Y G, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H. 2009b. Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with shoot growth in ‘‘super’’ rice. Field Crops Research, 113, 31–40.
Zheng Y P, Wang C B, Cheng B, Wu Z F, Jiang S Q, Sun X S, Cheng D X. 2007. Yield effect and optimized-measure combination of N fertilizer and plant density for different peanut variety types under single-seed planting. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1, 201–205. (in Chinese)
Zheng Y P, Xu T T, Zheng Y M, Sun K X, Wang C B. 2012. Study on single seed sowing density of peanut under different planting patterns. Subtropical Agriculture Research, 8, 82–84. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHANG Sheng-zhong, HU Xiao-hui, WANG Fei-fei, CHU Ye, YANG Wei-qiang, XU Sheng, WANG Song, WU Lan-rong, YU Hao-liang, MIAO Hua-rong, FU Chun, CHEN Jing. A stable and major QTL region on chromosome 2 conditions pod shape in cultivated peanut (Arachis hyopgaea L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2323-2334.
[2] LIU Zhu, NAN Zhen-wu, LIN Song-ming, YU Hai-qiu, XIE Li-yong, MENG Wei-wei, ZHANG Zheng, WAN Shu-bo. Millet/peanut intercropping at a moderate N rate increases crop productivity and N use efficiency, as well as economic benefits, under rain-fed conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 738-751.
[3] TIAN Jin-yu, LI Shao-ping, CHENG Shuang, LIU Qiu-yuan, ZHOU Lei, TAO Yu, XING Zhi-peng, HU Ya-jie, GUO Bao-wei, WEI Hai-yan, ZHANG Hong-cheng. Increasing the appropriate seedling density for higher yield in dry direct-seeded rice sown by a multifunctional seeder after wheat-straw return[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 400-416.
[4] YANG Wen-jia, LI Yu-lin, LIU Wei-jian, WANG Shi-wen, YIN Li-na, DENG Xi-ping. Agronomic management practices in dryland wheat result in variations in precipitation use efficiency due to their differential impacts on the steps in the precipitation use process[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 92-107.
[5] JIANG Hui, GAO Ming-wei, CHEN Ying, ZHANG Chao, WANG Jia-bao, CHAI Qi-chao, WANG Yong-cui, ZHENG Jin-xiu, WANG Xiu-li, ZHAO Jun-sheng. Effect of the L-D1 alleles on leaf morphology, canopy structure and photosynthetic productivity in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 108-119.
[6] LI Teng, ZHANG Xue-peng, LIU Qing, LIU Jin, CHEN Yuan-quan, SUI Peng. Yield penalty of maize (Zea mays L.) under heat stress in different growth stages: A review[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2465-2476.
[7] ZHU Peng-fei, YANG Qing-li, ZHAO Hai-yan. Identification of peanut oil origins based on Raman spectroscopy combined with multivariate data analysis methods[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2777-2785.
[8] TIAN Chang, SUN Ming-xue, ZHOU Xuan, LI Juan, XIE Gui-xian, YANG Xiang-dong, PENG Jian-wei. Increase in yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double rice with long-term application of controlled-release urea[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 2106-2118.
[9] ZHAO Zhi-hao, SHI Ai-min, GUO Rui, LIU Hong-zhi, HU Hui, WANG Qiang. Protective effect of high-oleic acid peanut oil and extra-virgin olive oil in rats with diet-induced metabolic syndrome by regulating branched-chain amino acids metabolism[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 878-891.
[10] XIE Jun, Blagodatskaya EVGENIA, ZHANG Yu, WAN Yu, HU Qi-juan, ZHANG Cheng-ming, WANG Jie, ZHANG Yue-qiang, SHI Xiao-jun. Substituting nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer with optimal amount of crop straw improved rice grain yield, nutrient use efficiency and soil carbon sequestration[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3345-3355.
[11] Ebrahim ROOHI, Reza MOHAMMADI, Abdoul Aziz NIANE, Javad VAFABAKHSH, Mozaffar ROUSTAEE, Mohammad Reza JALAL KAMALI, Shahriar SOHRABI, Shahriar FATEHI, Hossain TARIMORADI. Genotype×tillage interaction and the performance of winter bread wheat genotypes in temperate and cold dryland conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3199-3215.
[12] LIU Xue-jing, YIN Bao-zhong, HU Zhao-hui, BAO Xiao-yuan, WANG Yan-dong, ZHEN Wen-chao. Physiological response of flag leaf and yield formation of winter wheat under different spring restrictive irrigation regimes in the Haihe Plain, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2343-2359.
[13] CHEN Yuan, LIU Zhen-yu, HENG Li, Leila I. M. TAMBEL, ZHANG Xiang, CHEN Yuan, CHEN De-hua. Effects of plant density and mepiquat chloride application on cotton boll setting in wheat–cotton double cropping system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2372-2381.
[14] ZHAO Shi-cheng, LÜ Ji-long, XU Xin-peng, LIN Xiao-mao, Luiz Moro ROSSO, QIU Shao-jun, Ignacio CIAMPITTI, HE Ping . Peanut yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient requirements in different regions of China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2502-2511.
[15] LIU Zheng-chun, WANG Chao, BI Ru-tian, ZHU Hong-fen, HE Peng, JING Yao-dong, YANG Wu-de. Winter wheat yield estimation based on assimilated Sentinel-2 images with the CERES-Wheat model[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(7): 1958-1968.
No Suggested Reading articles found!