Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2020, Vol. 19 Issue (4): 953-964    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62676-6
Crop Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Concentration difference of auxin involved in stem development in soybean
JIANG Zhen-feng1, LIU Dan-dan1, WANG Tian-qiong1, LIANG Xi-long2, CUI Yu-hai3, LIU Zhi-hua4, LI Wen-bin1  
1 Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology, Ministry of Education/Soybean Research Institute, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P.R.China
2 College of Agronomy, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163311, P.R.China
3 London Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, London N5V 4T3, Canada
4 College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Auxin regulates cell division and elongation of the primordial cells through its concentration and then shaped the plant architecture.  Cell division and elongation form the internode of soybean and result in different plant heights and lodging resistance.  Yet the mechanisms behind are unclear in soybean.  To elucidate the mechanism of the concentration difference of auxin related to stem development in soybean, samples of apical shoot, elongation zone, and mature zone from the developing stems of soybean seedlings, Charleston, were harvested and measured for auxin concentration distributions and metabolites to identify the common underlying mechanisms responsible for concentration difference of auxin.  Distribution of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), and methylindole-3-acetic acid (Me-IAA) were determined and auxin concentration distributions were found to have a complex regulation mechanism.  The concentrations of IAA and Me-IAA in apical shoot were significantly different between elongation zone and mature zone resulting in an IAA gradient.  Tryptophan dependent pathway from tryptamine directly to IAA or through indole-3-acetonitrile to IAA and from indole-3-propionic acid (IPA) to IAA were three primary IAA synthesis pathways.  Moreover, some plant metabolites from flavonoid and phenylpropanoid synthesis pathways showed similar or reverse gradient and should involve in auxin homeostasis and concentration difference.  All the data give the first insight in the concentration difference and homeostasis of auxin in soybean seedlings and facilitate a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanism of stem development and growth.  The gathered information also helps to elucidate how plant height is formed in soybean and what strategy should be adopted to regulate the lodging resistance in soybean.
Keywords:  soybean        concentration difference of auxin        stem development        metabolite  
Received: 24 December 2018   Accepted:
Fund: The authors thank Dr. Vi Nguyen (London Research and Development Center, AAFC) for her helpful suggestions. This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571693) and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-04-04B).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence LIU Zhi-hua, Tel: +86-451-55191173, E-mail:; LI Wen-bin, Tel: +86-451-55190778, E-mail:   
About author:  JIANG Zhen-feng, E-mail:;

Cite this article: 

JIANG Zhen-feng, LIU Dan-dan, WANG Tian-qiong, LIANG Xi-long, CUI Yu-hai, LIU Zhi-hua, LI Wen-bin. 2020. Concentration difference of auxin involved in stem development in soybean. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(4): 953-964.

Adamowski M, Friml J. 2015. PIN-dependent auxin transport, action, regulation, and evolution. The Plant Cell, 27, 20–32.
Akpunarlieva S, Weidt S, Lamasudin D, Naula C, Henderson D, Barrett M, Burgess K, Burchmore R. 2017. Integration of proteomics and metabolomics to elucidate metabolic adaptation in Leishmania. Journal of Proteomics, 155, 85–98.
Amiour N, Imbaud S, Clément G, Agier N, Zivy M, Valot B, Balliau T, Armengaud P, Quilleré I, Cañas R, Tercet-Laforgue T, Hirel B. 2012. The use of metabolomics integrated with transcriptomic and proteomic studies for identifying key steps involved in the control of nitrogen metabolism in crops such as maize. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 5017–5033.
Babitzke P. 2004. Regulation of transcription attenuation and translation initiation by allosteric control of an RNA-binding protein, the Bacillus subtilis TRAP protein. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 7, 132–139.
Bajguz A, Piotrowska A. 2009. Conjugates of auxin and cytokinin. Phytochemistry, 70, 957–969.
Bartel B, LeClere S, Magidin M, Zolman B K. 2001. Inputs to the active indole-3-acetic acid pool, de novo synthesis, conjugate hydrolysis, and indole-3-butyric acid β-oxidation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 20, 198–216.
Benková E, Michniewicz M, Sauer M, Teichmann T, Seifertová D, Jürgens G, Frim J. 2003. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell, 115, 591–602.
Béziat C, Kleine-Vehn J. 2018. The road to auxin-dependent growth repression and promotion in apical hooks. Current Biology, 28, R519–R525.
Bouchard R, Bailly A, Blakeslee J J, Oehring S C, Vincenzetti V, Lee O R, Paponov I, Palme K, Mancuso S, Murphy A S, Schulz B, Geisler M. 2006. Immunophilin-like TWISTED DWARF1 modulates auxin efflux activities of Arabidopsis P-glycoproteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281, 30603–30612.
Brown D E, Rashotte A M, Murphy A S, Normanly J, Tague B W, Peer W A, Taiz L, Muday G K. 2001. Flavonoids act as negative regulators of auxin transport in vivo in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 126, 524–535.
Buer C S, Muday G K. 2004. The transparent testa4 mutation prevents flavonoid synthesis and alters auxin transport and the response of Arabidopsis roots to gravity and light. The Plant Cell, 16, 1191–1205.
Chen W, Gong L, Guo Z, Wang W, Zhang H, Liu X, Yu S, Xiong L, Luo J. 2013. A novel integrated method for large-scale detection, identification, and quantification of widely targeted metabolites, application in the study of rice metabolomics. Molecular Plant, 6, 1769–1780.
Chen W, Wang W, Peng M, Gong L, Gao Y, Wan J, Wang S, Shi L, Zhou B, Li Z, Peng X, Yang C, Qu L, Liu X, Luo J. 2016. Comparative and parallel genome-wide association studies for metabolic and agronomic traits in cereals. Nature Communication, 7, 12767.
Chen Y, Zhou Q, Tian R, Ma Z, Zhao X, Tang J, Fu Z. 2018. Proteomic analysis reveals that auxin homeostasis influences the eighth internode length heterosis in maize (Zea mays). Scientific Reports, 8, 7159.
Cho M, Cho H T. 2013. The function of ABCB transporters in auxin transport. Plant Signal Behavior, 8, e22990.
Chubukov V, Zuleta I A, Li H. 2012. Regulatory architecture determines optimal regulation of gene expression in metabolic pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 5127–5132.
Cooper R L. 1995. Registration of ‘Charleston’ soybean. Crop Science, 35, 592.
Du F, Ruan G, Liu H. 2012. Analytical methods for tracing plant hormones. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 403, 55–74.
Esmon C A, Tinsley A G, Ljung K, Sandberg G, Hearne L B, Liscum E. 2006. A gradient of auxin and auxin-dependent transcription precedes tropic growth responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 236–241.
Forestan C, Varotto S. 2012. The role of PIN auxin efflux carriers in polar auxin transport and accumulation and their effect on shaping maize development. Molecular Plant, 5, 787–798.
Gong L, Chen W, Gao Y, Liu X, Zhang H, Xu C, Yu S, Zhang Q, Luo J. 2013. Genetic analysis of the metabolome exemplified using a rice population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 20320–20325.
Gray W M, Östin A, Sandberg G, Romano C P, Estelle M. 1998. High temperature promotes auxin-mediated hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 7197–7202.
Izumi Y, Okazawa A, Bamba T, Kobayashi A, Fukusaki E. 2009. Development of a method for comprehensive and quantitative analysis of plant hormones by highly sensitive nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta, 648, 215–225.
Jacobs M, Rubery P H. 1988. Naturally occurring auxin transport regulators. Science, 241, 346–349.
Jager C E, Symons G M, Nomura T, Yamada Y, Smith J J, Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y, Weller J L, Yokota T, Reid J B. 2007. Characterization of two brassinosteroid C-6 oxidase genes in pea. Plant Physiology, 143, 1894–1904.
Kuhn B M, Errafi S, Bucher R, Dobrev P, Geisler M, Bigler L, Za?ímalová E, Ringli C. 2016. 7-Rhamnosylated flavonols modulate homeostasis of the plant hormone auxin and affect plant development. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 291, 5385–5395.
Kutschera U, Briggs W R. 1987. Rapid auxin-induced stimulation of cell wall synthesis in pea internodes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 84, 2747–2751.
Ladurner A G. 2006. Rheostat control of gene expression by metabolites. Molecular Cell, 24, 1–11.
Lavy M, Estelle M. 2016. Mechanisms of auxin signaling development. Development, 143, 3226–3229.
LeClere S, Tellez R, Rampey R A, Matsuda S P, Bartel B. 2002. Characterization of a family of IAA-amino acid conjugate hydrolases from Arabidopsis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 20446–20452.
Leyser O. 2018. Auxin signaling. Plant Physiology, 176, 465–479.
Li J, Li C, Smith S. 2017. Hormone Metabolism and Signaling in Plants. 1st ed. Academic Press, Beijing. p. 616.
Libbert E, Fischer E, Drawert A, Schröuder R. 1970. Pathways of IAA production from tryptophan by plants and by their epiphytic bacteria, a comparison. II. Establishment of the tryptophan metabolites, effects of a native inhibitor. Physiologia Plantarum, 23, 278.
Ljung K, Bhalerao R P, Sandberg G. 2001. Sites and homeostatic control of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis during vegetative growth. The Plant Journal, 28, 465–474.
Ludwig-Müller J. 2000. Indole-3-butyric acid in plant growth and development. Plant Growth Regulation, 32, 219–230.
Ludwig-Müller J. 2011. Auxin conjugates: Their role for plant development and in the evolution of land plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 1757–1773.
Luo J. 2015. Metabolite-based genome-wide association studies in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 24, 31–38.
Di Mambro R, De Ruvo M, Pacifici E, Salvi E, Sozzani R, Benfey P N, Busch W, Novak O, Ljung K, Di Paola L, Marée A F M, Costantino P, Grieneisen V A, Sabatini S. 2017. Auxin minimum triggers the developmental switch from cell division to cell differentiation in the Arabidopsis root. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, E7641–E7649.
Mano Y, Nemoto K. 2012. The pathway of auxin biosynthesis in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 2853–2872.
Mashiguchi K, Tanaka K, Sakai T, Sugawara S, Kawaide H, Natsume M, Hanada A, Yaeno T, Shirasu K, Yao H, McSteen P, Zhao Y, Hayashi K, Kamiya Y, Kasahara H. 2011. The main auxin biosynthesis pathway in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 18512–18517.
May P, Christian N, Ebenhöh O, Weckwerth W, Walther D. 2011. Integration of proteomic and metabolomic profiling as well as metabolic modeling for the functional analysis of metabolic networks. Methods in Molecular Biology, 694, 341–363.
McMaster P, Leyser O. 2005. Shoot branching. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 56, 353–374.
Nishida A, Fukuzumi G. 1978. Formation of coniferyl alcohol from ferulic acid by the white-rot fungus Trametes. Phytochemistry, 17, 417–419.
Normanly J. 1997. Auxin metabolism. Physiologia Plantarum, 100, 431–442.
Pan X, Welti R, Wang X. 2008. Simultaneous quantification of major phytohormones and related compounds in crude plant extracts by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry, 69, 1773–1781.
Péret B, Swarup K, Ferguson A, Seth M, Yang Y, Dhondt S, James N, Casimiro I, Perry P, Syed A, Yang H, Reemmer J, Venison E, Howells C, Perez-Amador M A, Yun J, Alonso J, Beemster G T, Laplaze L, Murphy A, et al. 2012. AUX/LAX genes encode a family of auxin influx transporters that perform distinct functions during Arabidopsis development. The Plant Cell, 24, 2874–2885.
Perrot-Rechenmann C. 2010. Cellular responses to auxin, division versus expansion. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 2, a001446.
Potters G, Pasternak T P, Guisez Y, Jansen M A. 2009. Different stresses, similar morphogenic responses, integrating a plethora of pathways. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32, 158–169.
Qin G, Gu H, Zhao Y, Ma Z, Shi G, Yang Y, Pichersky E, Chen H, Liu M, Chen Z, Qu L J. 2005. An indole-3-acetic acid carboxyl methyltransferase regulates Arabidopsis leaf development. The Plant Cell, 17, 2693–2704.
Quittenden L J, Davies N W, Smith J A, Molesworth P P, Tivendale N D, Ross J J. 2009. Auxin biosynthesis in pea, characterization of the tryptamine pathway. Plant Physiology, 151, 1130–1138.
Rampey R A, LeClere S, Kowalczyk M, Ljung K, Sandberg G, Bartel B. 2004. A family of auxin-conjugate hydrolases that contributes to free indole-3-acetic acid levels during Arabidopsis germination. Plant Physiology, 135, 978–988.
Ross J J. 1998. Effects of auxin transport inhibitors on gibberellins in pea. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 17, 141–146.
Ru?icka K, Hejátko J. 2017. Auxin transport and conjugation caught together. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68, 4409–4412.
Seidel C, Walz A, Park S, Cohen J D, Ludwig-Müller J. 2006. Indole-3-acetic acid protein conjugates, novel players in auxin homeostasis. Plant Biology, 8, 340–345.
Sieburth L E. 1999. Auxin is required for leaf vein pattern in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 121, 1179–1190.
Simon S, Petrášek J. 2011. Why plants need more than one type of auxin. Plant Science, 180, 454–460.
Spiess G M, Hausman A, Yu P, Cohen J D, Rampey R A, Zolman B K. 2014. Auxin input pathway disruptions are mitigated by changes in auxin biosynthetic gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 165, 1092–1104.
Staswick P E, Serban B, Rowe M, Tiryaki I, Maldonado M T, Maldonado M C, Suza W. 2005. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. The Plant Cell, 17, 616–627.
Stepanova A N, Robertson-Hoyt J, Yun J, Benavente L M, Xie D Y, Dolezal K, Schlereth A, Jürgens G, Alonso J M. 2008. TAA1-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for hormone crosstalk and plant development. Cell, 133, 177–191.
Taylor L P, Grotewold E. 2005. Flavonoids as developmental regulators. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8, 317–323.
Wang B, Chu J, Yu T, Xu Q, Sun X, Yuan J, Xiong G, Wang G, Wang Y, Li J. 2015. Tryptophan-independent auxin biosynthesis contributes to early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 4821–4826.
Wang B, Smith S M, Li J. 2018. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 69, 437–468.
Weijers D, Nemhauser J, Yang Z. 2018. Auxin, small molecule, big impact. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69, 133–136.
Westfall C S, Muehler A M, Jez J M. 2013. Enzyme action in the regulation of plant hormone responses. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288, 19304–19311.
Winkler M, Niemeyer M, Hellmuth A, Janitza P, Christ G, Samodelov S L, Wilde V, Majovsky P, Trujillo M, Zurbriggen M D, Hoehenwarter W, Quint M, Villalobos L I A C. 2017. Variation in auxin sensing guides AUX/IAA transcriptional repressor ubiquitylation and destruction. Nature Communications, 8, 15706.
Wolbang C M, Chandler P M, Smith J J, Ross J J. 2004. Auxin from the developing inflorescence is required for the biosynthesis of active gibberellins in barley stems. Plant Physiology, 134, 769–776.
Won C, Shen X L, Mashiguchi K, Zheng Z Y, Dai X H, Cheng Y, Kasahara H, Kamiya Y, Chory J, Zhao Y. 2011. Conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid by TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASES OF ARABIDOPSIS and YUCCAs in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 18518–8523.
Woodward A W, Bartel B. 2005. Auxin, regulation, action, and interaction. Annals of Botany, 95, 707–735.
Yang Y, Xu R, Ma C J, Vlot A C, Klessig D F, Pichersky E. 2008. Inactive methyl indole-3-acetic acid ester can be hydrolyzed and activated by several esterases belonging to the AtMES esterase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 147, 1034–1045.
Yoshihara T, Spalding E P. 2017. LAZY genes mediate the effects of gravity on auxin gradients and plant architecture. Plant Physiology, 175, 959–969.
Zhang S W, Li C H, Cao J, Zhang Y C, Zhang S Q, Xia Y F, Sun D Y, Sun Y. 2009. Altered architecture and enhanced drought tolerance in rice via the down-regulation of indole-3-acetic acid by TLD1/OsGH3.13 activation. Plant Physiology, 151, 1889–1901.
Zhao Y. 2012. Auxin biosynthesis, a simple two-step pathway converts tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid in plants. Molecular Plant, 5, 334–338.
[1] YANG Hong-jun, YE Wen-wu, YU Ze, SHEN Wei-liang, LI Su-zhen, WANG Xing, CHEN Jia-jia, WANG Yuan-chao, ZHENG Xiao-bo. Host niche, genotype, and field location shape the diversity and composition of the soybean microbiome[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2412-2425.
[2] XU Lei, ZHAO Tong-hua, Xing Xing, XU Guo-qing, XU Biao, ZHAO Ji-qiu.

Model fitting of the seasonal population dynamics of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, in the field [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1797-1808.

[3] GAO Hua-wei, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, HONG Hui-long, ZHANG Xiang, SUN Ru-jian, WANG Hao-rang, WANG Xiao-bo, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Identification of tolerance to high density and lodging in short petiolate germplasm M657 and the effect of density on yield-related phenotypes of soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 434-446.
[4] QU Zheng, LI Yue-han, XU Wei-hui, CHEN Wen-jing, HU Yun-long, WANG Zhi-gang. Different genotypes regulate the microbial community structure in the soybean rhizosphere[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 585-597.
[5] GAO Hua-wei, SUN Ru-jian, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, FU Guang-hui, HONG Hui-long, GUO Bing-fu, ZHANG Xiang, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Characterization of the petiole length in soybean compact architecture mutant M657 and the breeding of new lines[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2508-2520.
[6] ZHANG Hua, WU Hai-yan, TIAN Rui, KONG You-bin, CHU Jia-hao, XING Xin-zhu, DU Hui, JIN Yuan, LI Xi-huan, ZHANG Cai-ying. Genome-wide association and linkage mapping strategies reveal genetic loci and candidate genes of phosphorus utilization in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2521-2537.
[7] ZOU Jia-nan, ZHANG Zhan-guo, KANG Qing-lin, YU Si-yang, WANG Jie-qi, CHEN Lin, LIU Yan-ru, MA Chao, ZHU Rong-sheng, ZHU Yong-xu, DONG Xiao-hui, JIANG Hong-wei, WU Xiao-xia, WANG Nan-nan, HU Zhen-bang, QI Zhao-ming, LIU Chun-yan, CHEN Qing-shan, XIN Da-wei, WANG Jin-hui. Characterization of chromosome segment substitution lines reveals candidate genes associated with the nodule number in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2197-2210.
[8] PAN Wen-jing, HAN Xue, HUANG Shi-yu, YU Jing-yao, ZHAO Ying, QU Ke-xin, ZHANG Ze-xin, YIN Zhen-gong, QI Hui-dong, YU Guo-long, ZHANG Yong, XIN Da-wei, ZHU Rong-sheng, LIU Chun-yan, WU Xiao-xia, JIANG Hong-wei, HU Zhen-bang, ZUO Yu-hu, CHEN Qing-shan, QI Zhao-ming. Identification of candidate genes related to soluble sugar contents in soybean seeds using multiple genetic analyses[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1886-1902.
[9] LIU Chen, TIAN Yu, LIU Zhang-xiong, GU Yong-zhe, ZHANG Bo, LI Ying-hui, NA Jie, QIU Li-juan. Identification and characterization of long-InDels through whole genome resequencing to facilitate fine-mapping of a QTL for plant height in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1903-1912.
[10] HUI Fang, XIE Zi-wen, LI Hai-gang, GUO Yan, LI Bao-guo, LIU Yun-ling, MA Yun-tao. Image-based root phenotyping for field-grown crops: An example under maize/soybean intercropping[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(6): 1606-1619.
[11] TIAN Yu, YANG Lei, LU Hong-feng, ZHANG Bo, LI Yan-fei, LIU Chen, GE Tian-li, LIU Yu-lin, HAN Jia-nan, LI Ying-hui, QIU Li-juan. QTL analysis for plant height and fine mapping of two environmentally stable QTLs with major effects in soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 933-946.
[12] LIU Sang-lin, CHENG Yan-bo, MA Qi-bin, LI Mu JIANG Ze, XIA Qiu-ju, NIAN Hai. Fine mapping and genetic analysis of resistance genes, Rsc18, against soybean mosaic virus[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 644-653.
[13] LIU Li-feng, GAO Le, ZHANG Li-xin, CAI Yu-peng, SONG Wen-wen, CHEN Li, YUAN Shan, WU Ting-ting, JIANG Bing-jun, SUN Shi, WU Cun-xiang, HOU Wen-sheng, HAN Tian-fu. Co-silencing E1 and its homologs in an extremely late-maturing soybean cultivar confers super-early maturity and adaptation to high-latitude short-season regions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 326-335.
[14] OCHAR Kingsley, SU Bo-hong, ZHOU Ming-ming, LIU Zhang-xiong, GAO Hua-wei, SOBHI F. Lamlom, QIU Li-juan. Identification of the genetic locus associated with the crinkled leaf phenotype in a soybean (Glycine max L.) mutant by BSA-Seq technology[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(12): 3524-3539.
[15] JIA Jia, WANG Huan, CAI Zhan-dong, WEI Ru-qian, HUANG Jing-hua, XIA Qiu-ju, XIAO Xiao-hui, MA Qi-bin, NIAN Hai, CHENG Yan-bo. Identification and validation of stable and novel quantitative trait loci for pod shattering in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.][J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3169-3184.
No Suggested Reading articles found!