Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2020, Vol. 19 Issue (3): 690-699    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62608-0
Crop Science Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Response and adaptation to the accumulation and distribution of photosynthetic product in peanut under salt stress
ZHANG Guan-chu1, 2, DAI Liang-xiang2, DING Hong2, CI Dun-wei2, NING Tang-yuan3, YANG Ji-shun2, ZHAO Xin-hua1, YU Hai-qiu1, ZHANG Zhi-meng
1 College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, P.R.China
2 Shandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao 266100, P.R.China
3 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Key Laboratory of Crop Water Physiology and Drought-tolerance Germplasm Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  

本研究以花育25为材料,设置非盐胁迫(CK),0.15%(S1)和0.3%盐胁迫(S2)三个处理,探究了盐胁迫对花生光合特性、植株不同器官干物质积累与分配及荚果发育动态的影响。结果表明,盐胁迫降低了花生的净光合速率(Pn),SPAD值,单株叶面积和产量;播种后第50天,CK的Pn分别较S1和S2处理高出13.71%和28.72%。同一生育期内,处理间的SPAD值差异均为CK>S1>S2。盐胁迫降低了花生的单株荚果重,百果重,百仁重和出米率,大小为CK>S1>S2。与CK相较,花生通过改变了光合产物在不同器官中的分配比例来适应盐胁迫,在营养生长和早期生殖期生长阶段,S1和S2处理增加了光合产物在茎和荚果中分配比例。整个生育期内,S1和S2处理的根系干重集中分布在0-40厘米的土壤层中。荚果发育过程中,S1和S2处理的荚果体积、干重和果仁干重的最大生长速率(Vmax)均下降;收获时,S1和S2处理的荚果和果仁的体积较CK均降低,因此盐胁迫下花生通过降低荚果和果仁体积来提高饱满度。以上发现为盐碱地种植花生提供了理论指导




Abstract  
To clarify the response and adaptability of peanut under salt stress, Huayu 25 was used as the material, and non-salt stress (CK), 0.15% salt stress (S1), and 0.3% salt stress (S2) were applied as three treatments.  The study analysed the effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics, photosynthetic substances accumulation and distribution as well as the ecological adaptability of peanuts.  The results showed that net photosynthetic rate (Pn), SPAD value, leaf area, and peanut yield were reduced under salt stress.  Pn in CK was 13.71 and 28.72% higher than that in S1 and S2 at the 50th day after planting, respectively.  At the same growth period, the SPAD value among treatments was ranked as follows: CK>S1>S2.  The 100-pod mass, 100-kernel mass, kernel rate to pod, and pod mass per plant were reduced under salt stress, and the trend was CK>S1>S2.  The distribution proportion of dry matter in different organs of peanut plant was changed to adapt to such stress.  Roots under salt stress intensively distributed in a 0–40 cm soil layer for salt resistance.  Dry mass proportion in stems and pods increased during the vegetative stage and early period of reproductive stage, respectively.  The maximum growth rates of the pod volume, pod dry weight, and seed kernel dry weight all declined, and the pod and kernel volume at harvest were reduced, improving the seed plumpness under salt stress.  This finding could be useful in growing peanut in saline soil.
 
Keywords:  salt stress        peanut        ecological adaptability        photosynthetic product  
Received: 12 October 2018   Accepted:
Fund: This research was funded by the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-13), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771732), the Shandong Modern Agriculture Innovation Team, China (peanut) (SDAIT-04-06), the Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province, China (2017CXGC0308), the Key Scientific and Technological Innovation Program of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China (CXGC2017D02), and the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2017YL023).
Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence YU Hai-qiu, E-mail: haiqiuyu@163.com; ZHANG Zhi-meng, E-mail: qinhdao@126.com   

Cite this article: 

ZHANG Guan-chu, DAI Liang-xiang, DING Hong, CI Dun-wei, NING Tang-yuan, YANG Ji-shun, ZHAO Xin-hua, YU Hai-qiu, ZHANG Zhi-meng . 2020. Response and adaptation to the accumulation and distribution of photosynthetic product in peanut under salt stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(3): 690-699.

Ayupova D A, Zabotina O A. 2000. Plant oligosaccharides enhancing the low temperature adaptation. Biochemical Society Transactions, 28, 1447.
Bazihizina N, Veneklaas E J, Barrett-Lennard E G, Colmer T D. 2017. Hydraulic redistribution: Limitations for plants in saline soils. Plant Cell and Environment, 40, 2437–2446.
Bennett A B, Sweger B L, Spanswick R M. 1984. Sink to source translocation in soybean. Plant Physiology, 74, 434–436.
Bonelli L E, Monzon J P, Cerrudo A, Rizzalli R H, Andrade F H. 2016. Maize grain yield components and source-sink relationship as affected by the delay in sowing date. Field Crops Research, 198, 215–225.
Cao Y, Neif É M, Li W, Coppens J, Filiz N, Lauridsen T L, Davidson T A, Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E. 2015. Heat wave effects on biomass and vegetative growth of macrophytes after long-term adaptation to different temperatures: A mesocosm study. Climate Research, 66, 265–274.
Ding H, Zhang Z M, Kang T, Dai L X, Ci D W, Qin F F, Song W W. 2017. Rooting traits of peanut genotypes differing in drought tolerance under drought stress. International Journal of Plant Production, 11, 349–360.
Doorenbos J, Pruitt W O. 1992. Calculation of crop water requirements. In: FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper No. 24. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. pp. 1–65.
El-Akhal M R, Rincón A, Coba de la Pena T, Lucas M M, Mourabit N El, Barrijal S, Pueyo J J. 2013. Effects of salt stress and rhizobial inoculation on growth and nitrogen fixation of three peanut cultivars. Plant Biology, 15, 415–421.
Fajardo A, McIntire E J B. 2015. Under strong niche overlap conspecifics do not compete but help each other to survive: Facilitation at the intraspecific level. Journal of Ecology, 99, 642–650.
Fernández C, Vega J A, Fontúrbel T. 2018. Vegetative growth response of Cytisus oromediterraneus to fuel reduction treatments. Plant Ecology, 219, 251–259.
Forestan C, Farinati S, Rouster Jacques, Lassagne H, Lauria M, Ferro N D, Varotto S. 2018. Control of maize vegetative and reproductive development, fertility, and rRNAs silencing by HISTONE DEACETYLASE 108. Genetics, 208, 1443–1466.
Gupta J C S, Sen G. 1950. Photoperiodic induction in jute and a great acceleration of vegetative growth in C. capsularis. Nature, 166, 152–153.
Handa S, Handa A K, Hasegawa P M, Bressan R A. 1986. Proline accumulation and the adaptation of cultured plant cells to water stress. Plant Physiology, 80, 938–945.
Harb A, Krishnan A, Ambavaram M M, Pereira A. 2010. Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in Arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth. Plant Physiology, 154, 1254–1271.
Ierna A, Mauromicale G. 2006. Physiological and growth response to moderate water deficit of off-season potatoes in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management, 82, 193–209.
Inal A, Gunes A. 2008. Interspecific root interactions and rhizosphere effects on salt ions and nutrient uptake between mixed grown peanut/maize and peanut/barley in original saline-sodic-boron toxic soil. Plant Physiology, 165, 490–503.
Jackson M B, Colmer T D. 2005. Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress. Annals of Botany, 96, 501–505.
Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Kesmala T, Patanothai A. 2008. Identification of peanut genotypes with high water use efficiency under drought stress conditions from peanut germplasm of diverse origins. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 7, 628–638.
Jordan W R, Ritchie J T. 1971. Influence of soil water stress on evaporation, root absorption, and internal water status of cotton. Plant Physiology, 48, 783–788.
Leidi E O, Silberbush M, Soares M I M, Lips S H. 1992. Salinity and nitrogen nutrition studies on peanut and cotton plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 15, 591–604.
Li J H, Emmanuel Arkorful, Cheng S Y, Zhou Q Q, Li H, Chen X, Sun K, Li X H. 2018. Alleviation of cold damage by exogenous application of melatonin in vegetatively propagated tea plant. Scientia Horticulturae, 238, 356–362.
Martìnez J P, Ledent J F, Bajji M, Kinet J M, Lutts S. 2003. Effect of water stress on growth, Na+, and K+, accumulation and water use efficiency in relation to osmotic adjustment in two populations of Atriplex halimus. Plant Growth Regulation, 41, 63–73.
Mason N W H, Bello F D, Dole?al J, Lepš J. 2011. Niche overlap reveals the effects of competition, disturbance and contrasting assembly processes in experimental grassland communities. Journal of Ecology, 99, 788–796.
Meena H N, Meena M, Yadav R S. 2016. Comparative performance of seed types on yield potential of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under saline irrigation. Field Crops Research, 196, 305–310.
Miyama M, Tada Y. 2008. Transcriptional and physiological study of the response of Burma mangrove (Bruguiera gymnorhiza) to salt and osmotic stress. Plant Molecular Biology, 68, 119–129.
Ni J J, Leung A K, Ng C W W, So P S. 2017. Investigation of plant growth and transpiration-induced matric suction under mixed grass-tree conditions. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54, 561–573.
Purtolas J, Ballester C, Elphinstone E D, Dodd I C. 2014. Two potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties differ in drought tolerance due to differences in root growth at depth. Functional Plant Biology, 41, 1107–1118.
Qin L Q, Li L, Bi C, Zhang Y L, Wan S B, Meng J J, Meng Q W, Li X G. 2011. Damaging mechanisms of chilling and salt stress to Arachis hypogaea L. leaves. Photosynthetica, 49, 37–42.
Shameer S, Prasad T N V K V. 2018. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agricultural practices with special reference to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Growth Regulation, 84, 603–615.
Sikirou M, Shittu A, Konaté K A, Maji A T, Ngaujah A S, Sanni K A. 2018. Screening African rice (Oryza glaberrima) for tolerance to abiotic stresses: i. Fe toxicity. Field Crops Research, 220, 3–9.
Singh A L, Hariprasanna K, Chaudhari V, Gor H K, Chikani B M. 2010. Identification of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars tolerant of soil salinity. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 33, 1761–1776.
Singh S, Russell B M. 1981. Water use by maize/pigeonpeas intercrop on a deep Vertisol. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Pigeonpeas. ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, AP, India. pp. 271–282.
Sønsteby A, Heide O M. 2009. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on growth and flowering in the annual (primocane) fruiting raspberry (Rubus idaeus l.) cultivar ‘polka’. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 84, 439–446.
Yañez P, Chinone S, Hirohata R, Ohno H, Ohkawa K. 2012. Effects of time and duration of short-day treatments under long-day conditions on flowering of a quantitative short-day sunflower (Helianthus annuus l.) ‘sunrich orange’. Scientia  Horticulturae, 140, 8–11.
Ye H, Roorkiwal M, Valliyodan B, Zhou L, Chen P, Varshney R K, Nguyen H T. 2018. Genetic diversity of root system architecture in response to drought stress in grain legumes. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69, 3267–3277.
Zhao M X, Sun H Y, Ji R R. 2013. In vitro mutagenesis and directed screening for salt-tolerant mutants in peanut. Euphytica, 193, 89–99.
[1] MA Xiao-wen, MA Qiu-xiang, MA Mu-qing, CHEN Yan-hang, GU Jin-bao, LI Yang, HU Qing, LUO Qing-wen, WEN Ming-fu, ZHANG Peng, LI Cong, WANG Zhen-yu.

Cassava MeRS40 is required for the regulation of plant salt tolerance [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1396-1411.

[2] WANG Chu-kun, ZHAO Yu-wen, HAN Peng-liang, YU Jian-qiang, HAO Yu-jin, XU Qian, YOU Chun-xiang, HU Da-gang. Auxin response factor gene MdARF2 is involved in ABA signaling and salt stress response in apple[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2264-2274.
[3] LI Peng-cheng, YANG Xiao-yi, WANG Hou-miao, PAN Ting, YANG Ji-yuan, WANG Yun-yun, XU Yang, YANG Ze-feng, XU Chen-wu. Metabolic responses to combined water deficit and salt stress in maize primary roots[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(1): 109-119.
[4] LIU Min-min, LI Ya-lun, LI Guang-cun, DONG Tian-tian, LIU Shi-yang, LIU Pei, WANG Qing-guo. Overexpression of StCYS1 gene enhances tolerance to salt stress in the transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(9): 2239-2246.
[5] CHEN Bing-yu, LI Qi-zhai, HU Hui, MENG Shi, Faisal SHAH, WANG Qiang, LIU Hong-zhi . An optimized industry processing technology of peanut tofu and the novel prediction model for suitable peanut varieties[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(9): 2340-2351.
[6] WANG Hai-xia, WANG Ming-lun, WANG Xiu-zhong, DING Yu-long . Detection of seven phytohormones in peanut tissues by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(3): 700-708.
[7] HAN Peng-liang, DONG Yuan-hua, JIANG Han, HU Da-gang, HAO Yu-jin. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of apple U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase gene MdPUB29 reveals its involvement in salt tolerance[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(7): 1604-1612.
[8] LI Yan-hong, SHI De-yang, LI Guang-hao, ZHAO Bin, ZHANG Ji-wang, LIU Peng, REN Bai-zhao, DONG Shu-ting. Maize/peanut intercropping increases photosynthetic characteristics, 13C-photosynthate distribution, and grain yield of summer maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(10): 2219-2229.
[9] ZHONG Yun-peng, QI Xiu-juan, CHEN Jin-yong, LI Zhi, BAI Dan-feng, WEI Cui-guo, FANG Jin-bao . Growth and physiological responses of four kiwifruit genotypes to salt stress and resistance evaluation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(1): 83-95.
[10] HUANG Ying, ZHANG Xiao-xia, LI Yi-hong, DING Jian-zhou, DU Han-mei, ZHAO Zhuo, ZHOU Li-na, LIU Chan, GAO Shi-bin, CAO Mo-ju, LU Yan-li, ZHANG Su-zhi. Overexpression of the Suaeda salsa SsNHX1 gene confers enhanced salt and drought tolerance to transgenic Zea mays[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(12): 2612-2623.
[11] GONG A-na, SHI Ai-min, LIU Hong-zhi, YU Hong-wei, LIU Li, LIN Wei-jing, WANG Qiang. Relationship of chemical properties of different peanut varieties to peanut butter storage stability[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(05): 1003-1010.
[12] XUE Chen-chen, XU Jin-yan, WANG Can, GUO Na, HOU Jin-feng, XUE Dong, ZHAO Jin-ming, XING Han. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a soybean GmGMP1 gene reveals its involvement in ascorbic acid biosynthesis and multiple abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic plants[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(03): 539-553.
[13] Engin Yol, Seymus Furat, Hari D Upadhyaya, Bulent Uzun. Characterization of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) collection using quantitative and qualitative traits in the Mediterranean Basin[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(01): 63-75.
[14] LI Ming-na, LONG Rui-cai, FENG Zi-rong, LIU Feng-qi, SUN Yan, ZHANG Kun, KANG Jun-mei, WANG Zhen, CAO Shi-hao. Transcriptome analysis of salt-responsive genes and SSR marker exploration in Carex rigescens using RNA-seq[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(01): 184-196.
[15] Sajid Hussain, ZHANG Jun-hua, ZHONG Chu, ZHU Lian-feng, CAO Xiao-chuang, YU Sheng-miao, Allen Bohr James, HU Ji-jie, JIN Qian-yu. Effects of salt stress on rice growth, development characteristics, and the regulating ways: A review[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(11): 2357-2374.
No Suggested Reading articles found!