|
|
|
|
|
| Effects of imidacloprid and thiamethoxam as seed treatments on the early seedling characteristics and aphid-resistance of oilseed rape |
| HUANG Liang, ZHAO Chun-lin, HUANG Fang, BAI Run-e, LÜ Yao-bin, YAN Feng-ming, HAO Zhong-ping |
1、School of Agricultural and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an 311300, P.R.China
2、Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, P.R.China
3、College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, P.R.China
4、Key Laboratory of Crop Quality Improvement of Anhui Province/Crop Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hefei 230031, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 Seed treatments with the neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and thiamethoxam were evaluated to determine whether the chemicals at effective concentrations for aphid control would influence the germination and early growth of oilseed rape, Brassica napus. Treatment with imidacloprid or thiamethoxam did not affect the cumulative germination rate, but significantly inhibited establishment potential by suppressing root system development in the cotyledon stage. However, these alterations in seedling development in the thiamethoxam-treated seeds appeared not to be detrimental as leaves developed; in contrast, for the seedlings with imidacloprid as seed treatment agent, a significantly decreased shoot/root ratio was still evident at the late two-leaf stage. After two leaves developed, chlorophyll content per leaf in the thiamethoxam treatment was significantly higher than that of the control, while chlorophyll content per leaf in the imidacloprid treatment remained close to that in the control. Most other parameters, i.e., height, leaf area, weight of stem, leaf or root, and other growth indexes, between the treatments and the control showed no significant difference. Additionally, it was found that storage time of the treated seeds had a significant effect on cumulative germination rate. Treatment 30 d before planting significantly reduced germination relative to that of the control. All of the plants treated with neonicotinoids were shown to have significant anti-aphid characteristics that persisted until the end of the trial.
Abstract Seed treatments with the neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and thiamethoxam were evaluated to determine whether the chemicals at effective concentrations for aphid control would influence the germination and early growth of oilseed rape, Brassica napus. Treatment with imidacloprid or thiamethoxam did not affect the cumulative germination rate, but significantly inhibited establishment potential by suppressing root system development in the cotyledon stage. However, these alterations in seedling development in the thiamethoxam-treated seeds appeared not to be detrimental as leaves developed; in contrast, for the seedlings with imidacloprid as seed treatment agent, a significantly decreased shoot/root ratio was still evident at the late two-leaf stage. After two leaves developed, chlorophyll content per leaf in the thiamethoxam treatment was significantly higher than that of the control, while chlorophyll content per leaf in the imidacloprid treatment remained close to that in the control. Most other parameters, i.e., height, leaf area, weight of stem, leaf or root, and other growth indexes, between the treatments and the control showed no significant difference. Additionally, it was found that storage time of the treated seeds had a significant effect on cumulative germination rate. Treatment 30 d before planting significantly reduced germination relative to that of the control. All of the plants treated with neonicotinoids were shown to have significant anti-aphid characteristics that persisted until the end of the trial.
|
|
Received: 12 January 2015
Accepted: 16 December 2015
|
| Fund: This research was supported by the National Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research of Public Interests of China (201303030) and the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (1408085MKL65). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Lü Yao-bin, Tel: +86-571-86400445,E-mail: luybcn@163.com; YAN Feng-ming, Tel: +86-371-63558172, E-mail: yfmpku@163.com
E-mail: luybcn@163.com;yfmpku@163.com
|
| About author: HUANG Liang, Tel: +86-571-86339933, E-mail: liang3599@sina.com; |
Cite this article:
HUANG Liang, ZHAO Chun-lin, HUANG Fang, BAI Run-e, Lü Yao-bin, YAN Feng-ming, HAO Zhong-ping.
2015.
Effects of imidacloprid and thiamethoxam as seed treatments on the early seedling characteristics and aphid-resistance of oilseed rape. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(12): 2581-2589.
|
| Addison P J, Fisher P W, Zydenbos S M. 2002. Imidaclopridseed treatments for the control of springtails in seedlingbrassicas. New Zealand Plant Protection, 55, 317-321Armour S L, Melcher U, Pirone T P, Lyttle D J, Essenberg R C.1983. Helper component for aphid transmission encodedby region II of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA. Virology, 129,25-30Atreya C D, Raccah B, Pirone T P. 1990. A point mutation in thecoat protein abolishes aphid transmissibility of a potyvirus.Virology, 178, 161-165Bi J L, Ballmer G R, Hendrix D L, Henneberry T J, Toscano NC. 2001. Effect of cotton nitrogen fertilization on Bemisiaargentifolii populations and honeydew production.Entomolgia Experimentalis et Applicata, 99, 25-36Buntin D G, Raymer P L. 1994. Pest status of aphids and otherinsects in winter canola in Georgia. Journal of EconomicEntomology, 87, 1097-1104Cataneo A C, Ferreira L C, Carvalho J C, Andréo-Souza Y,Corniani N, Mischan M M, Nunes J C. 2010. Improvedgermination of soybean seed treated with thiamethoxamunder drought conditions. Seed Science and Technology,38, 248-251Chanprasert W, Myint T, Srikul S, Wongsri O. 2012. Effectsof neonicotinoid and method of breaking dormancy onseed germination and seedling vigour of oil palm (Elaeisguineensis Jacq.). Journal of Oil Palm Research, 24,1227-1234Dewar A M, Tait M F, Stevens M. 2011. Efficacy of thiamethoxamseed treatment against aphids and turnip yellows virus inoilseed rape. Aspects of Applied Biology, 106, 195-202Dong G Z, Yang J C, Jiang H M, Zhang J F, Li L L, Li S S, LuC. 2012. Effects of imidacloprid and carbendazim on thegrowth of tomato. Journal of Agro-Environment Science,31, 645-653 (in Chinese)Dosdall L M, Clayton G W, Harker K N, O’Donovan J T,Stevenson F C. 2003. Weed control and root maggots:Making canola pest management strategies compatible.Weed Science, 51, 576-585Doussan C, Pages L, Vercambre G. 1998. Modelling of thehydraulic architecture of root systems: An integratedapproach to water absorption-model description. Annalsof Botany, 81, 213-223Du B Z, Wang J Y, Mo P, Zhang Y, Qu A J. 2013. The effectsof imidacloprid on maize chlorophyll contents at differentapplication times. Pesticide Science and Administration,34, 57-59. (in Chinese)Ester A, de Putter H, van Bilsen J G P M. 2003. Filmcoatingthe seed of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. cv. capitata L.)and cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis L.) withimidacloprid and spinosad to control insect pests. CropProtection, 22, 761-768Gorim L, Asch F. 2012. Effects of composition and shareof seed coatings on the mobilization efficiency of cerealseeds during germination. Journal of Agronomy and CropScience, 198, 81-91Goulson D. 2013. An overview of the environmental risks posedby neonicotinoid insecticides. Journal of Applied Ecology,50, 977-987Horii A, McCue P, Shetty K. 2007. Enhancement of seedvigour following insecticide and phenolic elicitor treatment.Bioresource Technology, 98, 623-632Jam N A, Kocheyli F, Mossadegh M S, Rasekh A, Saber M.2014. Lethal and sublethal effects of imidacloprid andpirimicarb on the melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover(Hemiptera: Aphididae) under laboratory conditions. Journalof Crop Protection, 3, 89-98Kapustka L A, Reporter M. 1993. Terrestrial primary producers.In: Peter Calow, ed., Handbook of Ecotoxicology, vol.1.Blackwell Scientific Publications, USA. pp. 278-298Koo H N, An J J, Park S E, Kim J I, Kim G H. 2014. Regionalsusceptibilities to 12 insecticides of melon and cotton aphid,Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and a point mutationassociated with imidacloprid resistance. Crop Protection,55, 91-97Latheef M A, Carlton J B, Kirk I W, Hoffmann W C. 2009. Aerialelectro static charged sprays for deposition and efficacyagainst sweet potato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on cotton.Pest Management Science, 65, 744-752Lichtenthaler H K, Buschmann C. 2001. Chlorophylls andcarotenoids: Measurement and characterization by UVVISSpectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food AnalyticalChemistry, F4.3.1-F4.3.8. doi: 10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01Maienfisch P, Angst M, Brandl F, Fischer W, Hofer D, Kayser H,Kobel W, Rindlisbacher A, Senn R, Steinemann A, WidmerH. 2001. Chemistry and biology of thiamethoxam: A secondgeneration neonicotinoid. Pest Management Science, 57,906-913Mathre D E, Johnston R H, Grey W E. 2006. Small grain cereal seed treatment. The Plant Health Instructor. doi: 10.1094/PHI-I-2001-1008-01Nault B A, Taylor A G, Urwiler M, Rabaey T, Hutchison W D.2004. Neonicotinoid seed treatments for managing potatoleafhopper infestations in snap bean. Crop Protection, 23,147-154Qaderi M M, Kurepin L V, Reid D M. 2012. Effects of temperatureand watering regime on growth, gas exchange and abscisicacid content of canola (Brassica napus) seedlings.Environmental and Experimental Botany, 75, 107-113Qu Y Y, Xiao D, Li J Y, Chen Z, Biondi A, Desneux N,Gao X, Song D. 2015. Sublethal and hormesis effectsof imidacloprid on the soybean aphid Aphis glycines.Ecotoxicolocy, 24, 479-487Ragsdale D W, Landis D A, Brodeur J, Heimpel G E, DesneuxN. 2011. Ecology and management of the soybean aphid inNorth America. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 375-399Ragsdale D W, Voegtlin D J, O’Neil R J. 2004. Soybean aphidbiology in North America. Annals of Entomological Societyof America, 97, 204-208Schemeer H E, Bluett D J, Meredith R, Heatherington P J.1990. Field evaluation of imidacloprid as an insecticidalseed treatment in sugar beet and cereals with particularreference to virus vector control. In: Proceedings of BrightonCrop Protetion Conference, Pest and Disease. BCPC, Alton,Hants, UK. pp. 29-36Schroeder N C, Dumbleton A J, Zydenbos S M. 1998.Thiamethoxam seed coating on rape seed for the control ofcabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae (L.). In: Proceedingsof the New Zealand Plant Protection Conference. NewZealand Plant Protection Society, New Zealand. pp.240-243Stevens M M, Reinke R F, Coombes N E, Helliwell S, Mo JH. 2008. Influence of imidacloprid seed treatments on ricegermination and early seedling growth. Pest ManagementScience, 64, 215-222Taylor A G, Eckenrode C J, Straub R W. 2001. Seed coatingtechnologies and treatments for onions: Challenges andprogress. HortScience, 36, 199-205Tekrony D M, Hardin E E. 1969. Germination potentialof monogerm sugarbeet seed as determined by fieldemergence and laboratory germination. Journal of ASSBT,15, 607-616Tomizawa M, Casida J E. 2005. Neonicotinoid insecticidetoxicology: Mechanisms of selective action. Annual Reviewof Pharmacology, 45, 247-268Yang D, Wang N, Yan X, Shi J, Zhang M, Wang Z, Yuan H.2014. Microencapsulation of seed-coating tebuconazoleand its effects on physiology and biochemistry of maizeseedlings. Colloids and Surfaces (B: Biointerfaces), 114,241-246Wu Z, Schenk-Hamlin D, Zhan W, Ragsdale D W, Heimpel GE. 2004. The soybean aphid in China: A historical review.Annals of Entomological Society of America, 97, 209-218Zeng G M, Chen M, Zeng Z T. 2013. Risks of neonicotinoidpesticides. Science, 340, 1403. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
